REPORT Chhangunarayan

Structural Design Report for Medical Factory of Meera Biotech Pvt. Ltd. located at Chhangunarayan.
STRUCTURAL DESIGN REPORT
FOR
MEDICAL FACTORY
OF
MEERA BIOTECH PVT. LTD.
LOCATED
AT
CHHANGUNARAYAN
MAY, 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART 1 1
1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................
2. BUILDING/DESIGN PARAMETERS ...............................................................................................
2.1. BUILDING DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................
2.2. LOCATION OF THE SITE .............................................................................................................
2.3. STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ...............................................................................................................
2.4. FRAME SYSTEM ........................................................................................................................
2.5. FOUNDATION SYSTEM ...............................................................................................................
2.6. FLOOR SYSTEM .........................................................................................................................
2.7. STAIRCASE ...............................................................................................................................
2.8. BEAMS .....................................................................................................................................
2.9. COLUMNS .................................................................................................................................
3. MATERIALS ..............................................................................................................................
3.1. MATERIAL PROPERTIES .............................................................................................................
4. COLUMN GRID PLAN .................................................................................................................
5. KEY FRAME DIAGRAM ..............................................................................................................
6. DEAD / LIVE LOAD CALCULATION .............................................................................................
6.1. DEAD LOADS ............................................................................................................................
6.2. LIVE LOADS ..............................................................................................................................
6.3. LOAD ASSESSMENT...................................................................................................................
7. CALCULATION OF BASE SHEAR .................................................................................................
7.1.1. CLASS OF THE STRUCTURE ........................................................................................................
7.1.2. IMPORTANCE FACTOR ...............................................................................................................
7.1.3. ZONING FACTOR .......................................................................................................................
7.1.4. PERFORMANCE FACTOR.............................................................................................................
7.1.5. SOIL PROFILE TYPE....................................................................................................................
8. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN .............................................................................................................
8.1. LEVEL OF DESIGN .....................................................................................................................
8.2. METHOD OF SEISMIC ANALYSIS ................................................................................................
8.2.1. DESIGN SEISMIC FORCES ...........................................................................................................
8.3. DESIGN AND DETAILING ...........................................................................................................
8.4. DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBERS...........................................................................................
8.4.1. COLUMNS .................................................................................................................................
8.4.2. BEAMS .....................................................................................................................................
8.4.3. SLAB ........................................................................................................................................
8.4.4. FOOTING ..................................................................................................................................
9. LOAD CASES AND COMBINATIONS .............................................................................................
9.1.1. LOAD CASES.............................................................................................................................
9.1.2. LOAD COMBINATIONS ...............................................................................................................
10. RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................
11. CONCLUDING REMARKS ............................................................................................................
12. REFERENCE CODES ...................................................................................................................
13. REFERENCE BOOKS ...................................................................................................................
PART 2 ......................................................................................................................................................
1. INPUT DATA FIGURES...................................................................................................................
3D MODEL ................................................................................................................................................
2. OUTPUT DATA FIGURES ...............................................................................................................
PART 3 ......................................................................................................................................................
SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATION .........................................................................................................
ETABS DIAGRAMS .................................................................................................................................

Part 1
1. Introduction
The philosophy of seismic design can be summarized as follows:

1. Resist minor earthquakes without damage.
2. Resist moderate earthquake with minor structural and some non structural damage.
3. Resist major catastrophic earthquakes without collapse.
Structures should be designed on Weak beam-Strong column philosophy.
2. Building/Design Parameterss
2.1. Building Description
This is a four storied Medical Factory. The floor to floor height is 3.048m. The building plan is almost rectangular
shaped whose max width is 15.23 m and max length is 51.96 m. The maximum height of the building is 13.41m.
2.2. Location of the Site
The proposed site for the construction of medical factory is located at Chhangunarayan-6. The site is almost rectangular
in shape. The topography of the site is almost flat.
2.3. Structural System
With due consideration of functional, architectural and economical aspects, a Ductile Moment Resisting Reinforced
Concrete Frame has been considered as an appropriate structural system for this building.
2.4. Frame System
The structural system consists of thirteen frames in longitudinal direction and also seven frames in transverse direction
respectively. External wall consists of 230 mm thick chimney made brick masonry wall. Internal wall consists of 115
mm thick chimney made brick. The brick walls are considered as non load bearing filler wall.
2.5. Foundation System
The foundation system consists of isolated and strap footings.
2.6. Floor System
The floor system consists of 125 mm thick solid slabs.
2.7. Staircase
Open-well staircase has been provided for this building.
2.8. Beams
The main beam of size 300mm x 400 mm and secondary beam of size 230mm x 350mm has been chosen for this
building. Tie beam of 300 mm wide and 300 mm deep is provided at plinth level.
2.9. Columns
The columns of size 350mm x 350mm, 400mm x 400mm and 450mm x 450mm have been chosen for this building.
3. Materials
The grade of concrete mix to be used in the building is M20 for column, Beam, Slab and Footings. Thermo mechanically
treated bar of grade Fe 500 is to be used as reinforcement.
3.1. Material Properties
Concrete
Density 25 KN/ m3
Poisson’s ratio 0.2
Modulus of Elasticity (5000√fck) 25000.00 N/mm2 for M25
22360.67 N/mm2 for M20
4. Column Grid Plan

5. Dead / Live Load Calculation
5.1. Dead Loads

Dead loads include the self weight of the structure and all other permanent loads such as partitions, floor finish, etc,
which are fixed in position and invariable with time. Dead loads are calculated based on NBC 102: 1994.
Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) 25 KN/m3
Brick Masonry Wall 19 KN/m3
Floor Finishing Rooms 1.2 KN/m2
Floor Finishing Terrace 1.2 KN/m2
5.2. Live loads
Live loads include movable or moving loads without acceleration. This includes movable partitions, furniture,
equipments, people, vehicles, stored materials, etc. Live loads are calculated based on NBC 103: 1994.
Rooms 2 KN/m2
Terrace 1.5 KN/m2
Balcony / Stair 3 KN/m2
Toilet 2 KN/m2
5.3. Load Assessment
Floor Slab
Slab (125 mm) 3.125
Floor Finish 1.2
Live Load 2
Total 6.325 KN/m2
For Stair
Slab (150mm) 3.5
Floor Finish 1.2
Live Load 3
Total 7.7 KN/m2
For Toilet
Slab (125mm) 3.125
Floor Finish 1.2
Live Load 2
Total 6.275KN/m2
6. Calculation of Base Shear
6.1.1. Class of the Structure
The building is classified as a residential building.
6.1.2. Importance Factor
According to NBC-105 an importance factor of 1 has been chosen for this building.
6.1.3. Zoning Factor
Seismic Zoning factor of 1 has been chosen as per IS NBC105.
6.1.4. Soil profile type
The Site is classified as sub soil category of Type II (Medium Site).

7. Analysis and Design
The analysis has been carried out using a standard software package ETABS2015 based on finite element method.
7.1. Level of Design
The design is considered as “Professionally Engineered Structure”.
7.2. Method of Seismic Analysis
The building can be classified as a regular one. It satisfies the criteria listed in the clause 5.2 and 5.3 of NBC 105 (H<40
m). Hence, an equivalent Static Analysis (Seismic Coefficient Method) has been performed according to clause 10 of
NBC 105.
7.2.1. Design Seismic Forces
The computation of horizontal forces and their distribution has been carried out as per clause 8.1.1 and 10.0 of NBC 105:
1994.
The horizontal seismic shear force at the base of the structure is given by:
V = Cd Wt
The horizontal seismic force coefficient Cd is given by:
Cd = CZIK
The horizontal seismic force is distributed at each level i according to the following equation:
Fi = V Wi hi / ∑ Wi hi
7.3. Design and Detailing
The design of reinforced concrete structural members includes selection of material properties (grade of steel and
concrete), shape and size of cross section, factor of safety and amount of steel required. The design of reinforced
concrete members are carried out using limit state method as per IS 456: 2000.
Earthquake Resistant Design
Engineers do not design earthquake proof buildings. Instead engineers make earthquake resistant buildings. Such
buildings may get severely damaged but will not collapse even in the event of severe earthquake. In seismic resistant
design, actual forces experienced by the structure are reduced and reliance is placed on the ductility of the structure.
Detailing of Reinforcement as per IS 13920: 1993
IS 13920: 1993 is used for special design and detailing, related to earthquake resistant design. Special design provisions
are meant for achieving ductility in the structure. Ductility is achieved by avoiding brittle modes of failure, namely, shear
failure, bond failure. Detailing of steel reinforcement is an important aspect of structural design. Poor reinforcement
detailing can lead to structural failures.
7.4. Design of Structural Members
Design of structural elements has been carried our as per NBC 110: 1994. Design Templates and tables have been
developed in MS Excel. Extensive use of Design aids SP 16 has been made.
7.4.1. Columns
Longitudinal reinforcement in columns has been calculated for axial force – bending moment corresponding to critical
load combination. Symmetrical arrangement of reinforcement has been adopted.
Transverse reinforcement in column is calculated as per Clause 6.3.4 of NS: 501 – 2058.
The spacing of lateral ties is as per ductility requirements and it varies in different columns. Generally Φ8 @ 100 at end
region and Φ 8 @ 150 mm at mid region.
7.4.2. Beams
Longitudinal Reinforcement in beams are calculated based on the critical moments and are picked up from the envelopes
of bending moment diagrams.
Top Steel is provided as per maximum computed area of steel. Bottom steel is provided for maximum value out of
compression steel for top steel, half of tension steel of top steel and bottom tension steel.
Transverse reinforcement in beam is calculated as per Clause 5.3.3 of NS: 501 – 2058.
Spacing of lateral ties is as per ductility requirements and it varies in different beams. Generally, two legged Φ 8 @ 100
mm c/c is provided in the end region and Φ 8 @ 150 mm c/c the mid region.
Deflection criteria for Beam: one side continuous
Maximum Span depth ratio 14.81
Span of corresponding beam 5.48 m
Depth of corresponding beam 400mm
Width of Corresponding beam 300 mm
7.4.3. Slab
The depth of slab is governed by deflection criteria. The thickness of the slab works out to be 125 mm. Design has been
carried out as per moment coefficient method outlined in NBC 110: 1994.
Deflection criteria for Slab: two adjacent edges discontinuous
Critical Size of slab panel 3.02 m X 4.92 m
Calculated Short span to Effected depth ratio (L/d) = 28.78
Permissible L/d=26 X 1 X 2 X 1 52
Basic Value L/d ratio 26
Span Correction Factor 1
Modification factor for tension reinforcement 2
Compression reinforcement modification Factor 1
7.4.4. Footing
The footing sizes are governed by vertical loads. The footing sizes are calculated based on bearing capacity of the soil.
The footing sizes are fixed so as to minimize the differential settlement. The Bearing capacity of soil is calculated as 190
KN/m2. For detailed calculation see appendix.
8. Load Cases and Combinations
8.1.1. Load Cases
Load cases are the independent loadings for which the structure is explicitly analyzed. Earthquake forces occur in
random fashion in all directions. For buildings whose lateral load resisting elements are oriented in two principal
directions, it is usually sufficient to analyze in these to principal directions (X – and Y – direction) separately one at a
time. Thus, the load cases adopted are as follows:
i. Dead Load (DL)

ii. Live Load (LL)
iii. Earthquake load in +ve X- direction
iv. Earthquake load in - ve X- direction
v. Earthquake load in +ve Y- direction
vi. Earthquake load in - ve Y- direction
8.1.2. Load Combinations
Load combinations are the loadings formed by the linear combination of the independent loading conditions. The
different load cases have been combined as per Clause 4.5 of NBC 105: 1994. The load combinations are as follows:
i. 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL
ii. 1 DL + 1.3 LL + 1.25 EQ (+X)
iii. 1 DL + 1.3 LL + 1.25 EQ (-X)
iv. 1 DL + 1.3 LL + 1.25 EQ (+Y)
v. 1 DL + 1.3 LL + 1.25 EQ (-Y)
vi. .9 DL +1.25 EQ (+X)
vii. .9 DL +1.25 EQ (-X)
viii. .9 DL +1.25 EQ (+Y)
ix. .9 DL +1.25 EQ (-Y)
9. Results
A Linear Elastic Three Dimensional Analysis has been carried out. The static analysis procedure permitted by the code
has been used for the seismic analysis. Inter – storey drift is found to be within the limits. It is seen that, generally, the
amount of longitudinal reinforcement in beams and columns are governed by design internal forces and not by minimum
requirements. The minimum amount of transverse reinforcement as per ductility requirement always governs in case of
columns. The minimum amount of transverse reinforcement as per ductility requirement almost always governs except
for few cases in beams. The depth of slab is governed by the deflection requirements rather than by strength
requirements. The area of footing is governed by vertical loads and not by earthquake loads. The depth of footing slab is
governed by one way shear.
10. Concluding Remarks
Reinforced concrete construction is common all over the world. It is used extensively for construction of variety of
structures such as buildings, bridges, dams, water tanks, stadium, towers, chimneys, tunnels and so on.
Experiences from past earthquakes and extensive laboratory works have shown that a well designed and detailed
reinforced concrete structure is suitable for earthquake resistant structure. Ductility and strength required to resist major
earthquake can be achieved by following the recommendations made in the standard codes of practice for earthquake
resistant design.
11. Reference Codes
NBC 110: 1994 Plain and Reinforced Concrete

NBC 102: 1994 Unit Weights of Materials
NBC 103: 1994 Occupancy Load (Imposed Load)
NBC 104: 1994 Wind Load
NBC 105: 1994 Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal
NS: 501-2058 Code of Practice for Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete
Structures Subjected to Seismic Forces
SP: 16-1980 Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS: 456-1978
SP: 34-1987 Handbook on Concrete Reinforcement Detailing
12. Reference Books
Pillai, S. U., Menon, D. Reinforced Concrete Design, Tata McGraw Hill Publishing
Company Ltd, New Delhi, 1998.
Jain, A. K. Reinforced Concrete, Limit State Design, Fifth Edition, Nem
Chand and Bros, Roorkee, 1999
Rosenblueth, E. (Ed.) Design of Earthquake Resistant Structures, Pentech Press, London,
1980.
Part 2
1. Input data figures

2. Output data figures

Part 3
Sample Design calculation
Base Shear Calculation-1

Based on NBC 105:1984
Cd CZIK
Basic Seismic Coefficient C 0.08
Zoning Factor Z 1
Importance Factor I 1
Structural Performance Factor K 1
Design horizontal seismic coeff Cd 0.08
Height H 10.82 m
Time Period Ti 0.358 Secs
Weight of Building W 9407.1798 KN
Base shear V 752.574 KN

Beam Design -1
Grid ID position b D d Pt Ast req. Ast provided Pt Reinforcement
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.63 756.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16

mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.22 264.000 603.186 0.50 3−Φ16+0−Φ0
Top right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.63 756.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
3−Φ16+2−Φ12
A1-A1
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.32 384.000 829.380 0.69
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.45 540.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
Bottom right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.32 384.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.78 936.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.23 276.000 603.186 0.50 3−Φ16+0−Φ0
Top right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.78 936.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
468.000 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
A2-A2
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.39 829.380 0.69
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.57 684.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
Bottom right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.39 468.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.79 948.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.22 264.000 603.186 0.50 3−Φ16+0−Φ0
Top right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.79 948.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
480.000 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
A-A
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.4 829.380 0.69
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.61 732.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
Bottom right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.4 480.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.79 948.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.22 264.000 603.186 0.50 3−Φ16+0−Φ0
Top right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.79 948.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
3−Φ16+2−Φ12
B-B
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.4 480.000 829.380 0.69
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.61 732.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
Bottom right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.4 480.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.62 744.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.23 276.000 603.186 0.50 3−Φ16+0−Φ0
Top right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.62 744.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
372.000 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
C-C
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.31 829.380 0.69
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.39 468.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
Bottom right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.31 372.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.79 948.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.22 264.000 603.186 0.50 3−Φ16+0−Φ0
Top right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.79 948.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
480.000 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
1--1
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.4 829.380 0.69
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.61 732.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
Bottom right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.4 480.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.79 948.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.22 264.000 603.186 0.50 3−Φ16+0−Φ0
Top right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.79 948.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
3−Φ16+2−Φ12
2--2
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.4 480.000 829.380 0.69
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.61 732.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
Bottom right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.4 480.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.79 948.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.22 264.000 603.186 0.50 3−Φ16+0−Φ0
Top right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.79 948.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
480.000 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
3--3
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.4 829.380 0.69
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.61 732.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
Bottom right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.4 480.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.79 948.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.22 264.000 603.186 0.50 3−Φ16+0−Φ0
Top right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.79 948.000 1005.310 0.84 3−Φ16+2−Φ16
480.000 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
4-5-6-7
left 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.4 829.380 0.69
mid 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.61 732.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
Bottom right 0.3 0.4 0.36 0.4 480.000 829.380 0.69 3−Φ16+2−Φ12
left 0.23 0.35 0.31 0.52 418.600 515.221 0.64 2−Φ16+1−Φ12
mid 0.23 0.35 0.31 0.24 193.200 515.221 0.64 2−Φ16+1−Φ12
Top right 0.23 0.35 0.31 0.52 418.600 515.221 0.64 2−Φ16+1−Φ12
2−Φ16+1−Φ12
Sec Beam
left 0.23 0.35 0.31 0.26 209.300 515.221 0.64
mid 0.23 0.35 0.31 0.49 394.450 515.221 0.64 2−Φ16+1−Φ12
Bottom right 0.23 0.35 0.31 0.26 209.300 515.221 0.64 2−Φ16+1−Φ12
COLUMN DESIGN-1
COLUMN % of steel from Area Pt

Floor GRID X GRID Y B D Ast provided Reinforcement
ID etabs required provided
Base to second A 11 A11 0.35 0.35 1.02 1249.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
third to top A 11 A11 0.35 0.35 0.8 980 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
third to top A 12 A12 0.35 0.35 1.27 1555.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
third to top A 13 A13 0.35 0.35 1.11 1359.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
third to top A 14 A14 0.35 0.35 0.89 1090.25 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
third to top A 21 A21 0.35 0.35 0.95 1163.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
third to top A 22 A22 0.35 0.35 0.98 1200.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
third to top A 23 A23 0.35 0.35 0.98 1200.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
third to top A 4 A4 0.35 0.35 1.21 1482.25 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second A 1 A1 0.35 0.35 1 1225 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top A 1 A1 0.35 0.35 1 1225 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top A 2 A2 0.35 0.35 0.91 1114.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top A 3 A3 0.35 0.35 0.86 1053.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top A 4 A4 0.35 0.35 0.88 1078 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top A 5 A5 0.35 0.35 0.9 1102.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top A 6 A6 0.35 0.35 0.9 1102.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top A 7 A7 0.35 0.35 1.43 1751.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second B 1 B1 0.35 0.35 1.28 1568 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top B 1 B1 0.35 0.35 1.28 1568 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second B 2 B2 0.35 0.35 1.46 1788.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top B 2 B2 0.35 0.35 1.46 1788.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top B 3 B3 0.35 0.35 0.84 1029 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top B 4 B4 0.35 0.35 0.84 1029 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top B 5 B5 0.35 0.35 0.88 1078 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top B 6 B6 0.35 0.35 0.91 1114.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top B 7 B7 0.35 0.35 1.38 1690.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second b 2 b2 0.4 0.4 2.09 3344 3543.717 2.21 10−Φ20+2−Φ16

third to top b 2 b2 0.4 0.4 1.29 2064 2865.133 1.79 4−Φ20+8−Φ16
Base to second C 1 C1 0.35 0.35 1.14 1396.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top C 1 C1 0.35 0.35 1.14 1396.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top C 2 C2 0.35 0.35 0.86 1053.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top C 3 C3 0.35 0.35 1.07 1310.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second C 4 C4 0.35 0.35 1.28 1568 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top C 4 C4 0.35 0.35 1.28 1568 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top C 5 C5 0.35 0.35 1.03 1261.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second C 6 C6 0.35 0.35 1.2 1470 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top C 6 C6 0.35 0.35 1.2 1470 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top C 7 C7 0.35 0.35 1.46 1788.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
COMBINED FOOTING DESIGN

For B2-b2
factored
B2 526.348 789.5224 Safe Bearing Capacity 190 KN/m2
b2 426.010 639.0151 fck 20 N/mm2
952.358 1428.538
spacing(s) 3.04878 m s/2 1.524390244
CG of gravity of load from the center of C1

x 1.363784
COL SIZE 0.4

Length of footing = 3.84878 0.2
Provided length 3.9 m 13
Assume earth load of 15 %
3.9 x 1.65 (13' x 5'-6")
Footing width 1.478019 Area req. 5.764274
Provided Width 1.65 m 5.5 Area prov. 6.435
CHECK OK
UDL 366.292 KN/m
V1 362.831 0.990551661
At centerline of D2
V2 426.692 Distance from center of column to end
V1 362.831 0.990551661 of footing
At centerline of C2
V2 276.184
Point of 0 shear force 426.692 362.831

=
x 3.04878049 x(neg)
= 0.75
maximum positive Mu 179.7013352 KNm

maximum negative Mu 103.0195313 KNm shear force zero point 0.75 m
D check 202.345179 303.517768

Adopt D 450 mm
xu 0.18124 d 394
Ast 1048.694378 mm2

Ast min 780.12 mm2 bar dia 12 mm
spacing 177.85544
Provide 12 mm dia bar @ 150 mm c/c Ast provided 753.98224

OK
Design Of Staircase
1 Material Properties
2
fy 500.000 N/mm
2
fck 20.000 N/mm
cover 20.000 mm
2
diameter of main bars 12.000 mm
2
diameter of distribution bars 10.000 mm
Tread 0.250 m
Rise 0.158 m
Thickness of waist slab 0.165 m
width of slab 1.219 m
width of landing 1.219 m
thickness of landing slab 0.165 m
span of landing 1 1.320 m
span of landing 2 1.219 m
span of flight 1.778 m
Total Span 4.317 m
2 LOAD CALCULATION
2.1 LOAD ON WAIST SLAB

2
area of slab 0.049 m
area of step 0.020 m2
2
Total area 0.069 m
DLper m 1.714 kN/m 0.49375
2
DL 6.855 kN/m 1.975
2
FF 1.200 kN/m
2
LL 4.000 kN/m
total load per m square 12.055 kN/m2
2
Factored load 18.082 kN/m
load per meter 22.045 kN/m
2.2 LOAD ON LANDING
2
Self weight of slab 4.125 kN/m
FF 1.200 kN/m2
2
LL 4.000 kN/m
2
load per meter square 9.325 kN/m
2
Factored load 13.988 kN/m
load per meter 17.053 kN/m
3 CALCULATION OF MOMENTS
From SAP analysis we have ;

Mmax. = 46.740 kNm
R1= 41.350 kN
R2 = 41.350 kN
Thus, maximum tensile moment is obtained at this point and is calculated to be, Mmax = 46.740 kNm
Thus, let us take the design moment to be maximum of above, i.e. Mdesign= 46.74 kNm
4 DEPTH
0.118 m
effective depth from moment consideration
overall depth provided 0.165 m
effective depth 0.139 m
5 CALCULATION OF MAIN STEEL CALCULATION OF DISTRIBUTION

A 8.920 STEEL
B -60465.000
C 46740000.000
2 2
Ast 889.817 mm Ast 241.39 mm
diameter of steel 12.000 mm diameter of steel 10.00 mm
area of each steel 113.097 area of each steel78.54
spacing required 154.955 mm spacing required 396.67 mm
spacing provided 140.000 mm spacing provided150.00 mm
2 2
actual steel 984.868 mm actual steel 638.34 mm
CHECK FOR SHEAR

Vu 41.350
Tv 0.244
Pt 0.581
Tc 0.620
check safe in shear
CHECK FOR DEVELOPMENT LENGTH

Ld in terms of Ø 48.549
M1 46.740 kNm
V 41.350 kN
Lo(ancorage required 139.000 mm
Ld 1269.351 mm
Ø< 26.146 mm
Result Safe
7 DEFLECTION CHECK
Length (L) (m) 4.317
Breadth (b) (mm) 1219.141
Depth (D) (mm) 165.000
d (mm) 139.000
2
fck (N/mm ) 20.000
2
fy (N/mm ) 500.000
Moment (M) KNm 46.740
2
Mu/bd 1.984
2
Ast(reqd) mm 889.817
2
Ast(prov) mm 984.868
a 26.000
b 1.000
g 1.203
d 1.000
l 1.000
abgdl 31.279
Reqd (d) 138.004
L/d 31.055
Check ok
FOOTING DESIGN SHEET
DESIGN DATA
2
fck 20 N/mm
2
fy TMT 500 N/mm
Cl. Cover 50 mm
Bar Dia. 12 mm
d' 56 mm
Safe Bearing Capacity 190 KN/m2
Column size Footing size TRIAL
Load Grid Type Pu b l bp lp B L b l d D D' Reinforcement Provided
KN m m m m Provided m m X-direction Y-direction
1 163.95 A11 FOUR Way Shear 245.9 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 1.65 1.65 5.50 5.50 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
12 398.64 A4 FOUR Way Shear 598 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 1.65 1.65 5.50 5.50 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
14 259.36 A6 FOUR Way Shear 389 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 1.65 1.65 5.50 5.50 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
16 480.3 B1 FOUR Way Shear 720.4 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 1.80 1.80 6.00 6.00 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
23 426.01 b2 FOUR Way Shear 639 0.40 0.40 0.60 0.60 1.65 1.65 5.50 5.50 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
24 263.1 C1 FOUR Way Shear 394.6 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 1.65 1.65 5.50 5.50 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
Title: Load Calculation

Dead load of slab
2
Slab Thickness: 125 mm 3.125 KN/m
2
Stair Slab Thickness: 165 mm 4.125 KN/m
Dead Load Provided Weighted KN/m2
Live Load:
2
Rooms 4 KN/m
2
Stores 4 KN/m
2
Terrace: 2 KN/m
2
Stairs 4 KN/m
Floor Finish:
Rooms
Material Thickness Density W
mm KN/m3 KN/m2
Screeding 25 20.2 0.505
Marble 25 26 0.65
Total 1.155
Wall Load:
Thickness Density Opening Fl. Height Beam Depth Height W
Type of Wall
m KN/m3 % m m m KN/m
External Wall 0.25 19.2 3.048 0.425 2.623 12.59
Ext. Wall with Opening 0.25 19.2 70% 3.048 0.425 2.623 8.81
Partition Wall 0.125 19.2 3.048 0.425 2.623 6.30
Partition Wall below slab 0.125 19.2 3.048 0.125 2.923 7.02
Paraphet Wall 0.125 19.2 1 0 1 2.40
Paraphet Wall 0.25 19.2 1 0 1 4.80
TITLE:Slab Design
Design Data
fck 20 N/mm2
fy 500 TMT N/mm2
Cl. Cover 20 mm
Type of Panel W Lx Ly Ly/Lx Moment Coefficient Moment
R-bar provided
Neg short Pos. short Neg. long Pos. long Neg short Pos. short Neg. long Pos. long Mux b D fck Ast L-bar Dia. Minim steel Spacing pt Mu/bd2 Ast provided
mm
KN/m2 m m KN.m/m KN.m/m KN.m/m KN.m/m KN.m/m mm
2
mm N/mm mm
2
mm mm mm % N-mm/mm mm
two adjacent edges 7.325 3.0225 4.93 1.63 0.08 0.06 0.047 0.035 5.35 4.01 3.15 2.34 8.03 Neg short 1000 125 20 184 10 150 426.96 150 0.476 0.66 523.60
discontinuous
6.02 Pos. short 1000 125 20 136 10 150 523.60 150 0.476 0.50 523.60
4.72 Neg. long 1000 125 20 106 8 150 335.10 150 0.305 0.39 335.10
3.51 Pos. long 1000 125 20 78 8 150 335.10 150 0.305 0.29 335.10
DESIGN OF STRAP FOOTING
1 DESIGN DATA:
Unit wt of soil Ws 17 KN/m3

Angle of repose ф 0.524 30
Allowable bearing capacity qo 190 KN/m2
fck 20 N/mm2
fy 500 N/mm2
c/c length s 5.029 m
Column A data:
Pu 560.2802 KN
b 350 mm
D 350 mm
effective cover d' 60 mm
Column B data:
Pu 832.1492 KN
b 350 mm
D 350 mm
effective cover d' 60 mm
2 OUTPUT:
A. Depth of footing 1.242 m
Adopt depth of footing 1.5 m
B. Footing Dimensions:
Self wt % for footing 10%
CG of resultant area A & B 2.02 m
Assume B1=B2 B 1.9 m 6.333333
Adopt L1 1.65 m 5.5
Adopt L2 1.9 m 6.333333
C. Footing Slab Design:

xu/d 0.456
net upward soil pressure po 137.62 KN/m2
Assume beam width, bs 0.4 m 1'-4"
Transverse moment Mu-max 202 KNm
effective depth based on one way shear 444 mm
Assume reinforcement dia 12 mm
Required overall depth 500 mm
Depth at the edges 250 mm
Required Ast 1312 mm2
Provided Ast 1583 mm2
Required spacing 206.94 mm
Provided spacing 150 mm c/c
Distribution bar dia 12 mm
Spacing of distrubution bar 150 mm c/c
D. Depth of strap beam

Assume main bar of beam 20 mm
Assume clear cover 60 mm
effective depth provided d 470 mm
Assume clear cover 30 mm
Overall depth D 500 mm 1'-8"
Moment of resistant 201.4 KNm
No Dia No Dia
Ast top 4 20 0 0
Ast bottom 4 16 0 0
Provide 4 legged 10 mm dia stirrups @ 150 mm c/c

COLUMN DESIGN-2
COLUMN % of steel from Area Pt

Floor GRID X GRID Y B D Ast provided Reinforcement
ID etabs required provided
Base to second D 2 D2 0.35 0.35 1.56 1911 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top D 2 D2 0.35 0.35 1.08 1323 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top D 3 D3 0.35 0.35 1.16 1421 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top D 4 D4 0.4 0.4 0.87 1392 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0

third to top D 5 D5 0.4 0.4 0.84 1344 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0

third to top D 6 D6 0.4 0.4 0.84 1344 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0
Base to second D 7 D7 0.35 0.35 1.55 1898.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top D 7 D7 0.35 0.35 0.93 1139.25 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second E 2 E2 0.35 0.35 1.78 2180.5 2412.743 1.97 12−Φ16+0−Φ0

third to top E 2 E2 0.35 0.35 1.01 1237.25 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second E 3 E3 0.4 0.4 1.69 2704 2865.133 1.79 4−Φ20+8−Φ16

third to top E 3 E3 0.4 0.4 0.88 1408 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0

third to top E 4 E4 0.4 0.4 0.83 1328 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0

third to top E 5 E5 0.4 0.4 1.5 2400 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0

third to top E 6 E6 0.4 0.4 0.84 1344 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0
Base to second E 7 E7 0.35 0.35 1.7 2082.5 2412.743 1.97 12−Φ16+0−Φ0

third to top E 7 E7 0.35 0.35 1.1 1347.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second F 2 F2 0.35 0.35 1.54 1886.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top F 2 F2 0.35 0.35 0.99 1212.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second F 3 F3 0.4 0.4 1.61 2576 2865.133 1.79 4−Φ20+8−Φ16

third to top F 3 F3 0.4 0.4 0.93 1488 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0

third to top F 4 F4 0.4 0.4 0.85 1360 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0

third to top F 5 F5 0.4 0.4 0.8 1280 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0

third to top F 6 F6 0.4 0.4 0.8 1280 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0
Base to second F 7 F7 0.35 0.35 1.63 1996.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top F 7 F7 0.35 0.35 0.93 1139.25 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second G 4 G4 0.35 0.35 1.39 1702.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top G 4 G4 0.35 0.35 0.92 1127 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second G 5 G5 0.35 0.35 1.65 2021.25 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top G 5 G5 0.35 0.35 1.19 1457.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second G 6 G6 0.35 0.35 1.64 2009 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top G 6 G6 0.35 0.35 1.05 1286.25 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second G 7 G7 0.35 0.35 1.4 1715 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top G 7 G7 0.35 0.35 1.11 1359.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second H 4 H4 0.35 0.35 1.4 1715 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top H 4 H4 0.35 0.35 1.02 1249.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second H 5 H5 0.35 0.35 1.46 1788.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top H 5 H5 0.35 0.35 1 1225 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top H 6 H6 0.35 0.35 1.68 2058 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top H 7 H7 0.35 0.35 1.64 2009 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second I 4 I4 0.35 0.35 1.55 1898.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top I 4 I4 0.35 0.35 0.9 1102.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top I 5 I5 0.35 0.35 1.61 1972.25 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second I 6 I6 0.4 0.4 1.66 2656 2865.133 1.79 4−Φ20+8−Φ16

third to top I 6 I6 0.4 0.4 1.5 2400 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0

third to top I 7 I7 0.45 0.45 1.28 2592 3216.991 1.59 16−Φ16+0−Φ0
Base to second J 4 J4 0.35 0.35 1.61 1972.25 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top J 4 J4 0.35 0.35 0.93 1139.25 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second J 5 J5 0.35 0.35 1.64 2009 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top J 5 J5 0.35 0.35 1.64 2009 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
Base to second J 6 J6 0.4 0.4 1.67 2672 2865.133 1.79 4−Φ20+8−Φ16

third to top J 6 J6 0.4 0.4 1.5 2400 2412.743 1.51 12−Φ16+0−Φ0
Base to second J 7 J7 0.45 0.45 2.02 4090.5 4121.770 2.04 8−Φ20+8−Φ16

third to top J 7 J7 0.45 0.45 0.84 1701 3216.991 1.59 16−Φ16+0−Φ0
Base to second K 4 K4 0.35 0.35 1.46 1788.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top K 4 K4 0.35 0.35 1.27 1555.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top K 5 K5 0.35 0.35 1.5 1837.5 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top K 6 K6 0.35 0.35 1.6 1960 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12

third to top K 7 K7 0.35 0.35 1.39 1702.75 2060.885 1.68 8−Φ16+4−Φ12
FOOTING DESIGN SHEET
DESIGN DATA
2
fck 20 N/mm
2
fy TMT 500 N/mm
Cl. Cover 50 mm
Bar Dia. 12 mm
d' 56 mm
Safe Bearing Capacity 190 KN/m2
Column size Footing size TRIAL
Load Grid Type Pu b l bp lp B L b l d D D' Reinforcement Provided
KN m m m m Provided m m X-direction Y-direction
1 293.22 D2 FOUR Way Shear 439.8 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 1.65 1.65 5.50 5.50 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
7 424.99 E2 FOUR Way Shear 637.5 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 1.65 1.65 5.50 5.50 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
8 653.99 E3 FOUR Way Shear 981 0.40 0.40 0.60 0.60 2.00 2.00 6.67 6.67 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
13 246.82 F2 FOUR Way Shear 370.2 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 1.65 1.65 5.50 5.50 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
19 466.75 G4 FOUR Way Shear 700.1 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 1.80 1.80 6.00 6.00 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
23 688.19 H4 FOUR Way Shear 1032 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 2.10 2.10 7.00 7.00 494.0 0.55 0.28 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
26 469.4 H7 FOUR Way Shear 704.1 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 1.80 1.80 6.00 6.00 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
27 727.38 I4 FOUR Way Shear 1091 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 2.10 2.10 7.00 7.00 494.0 0.55 0.28 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
30 483.09 I7 FOUR Way Shear 724.6 0.45 0.45 0.65 0.65 1.80 1.80 6.00 6.00 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
31 727.54 J4 FOUR Way Shear 1091 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 2.10 2.10 7.00 7.00 494.0 0.55 0.28 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
34 620.5 J7 FOUR Way Shear 930.8 0.45 0.45 0.65 0.65 2.00 2.00 6.67 6.67 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
35 452.05 K4 FOUR Way Shear 678.1 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.55 1.80 1.80 6.00 6.00 444.0 0.50 0.25 12mm dia. @150mm c/c 12mm dia. @150mm c/c
ETABS Diagrams

REPORT Chhangunarayan

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

REPORT Chhangunarayan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Structural Design Report for Medical Factory of Meera Biotech Pvt. Ltd. located at Chhangunarayan.

STRUCTURAL DESIGN REPORT

MEERA BIOTECH PVT. LTD.

1. INPUT DATA FIGURES...................................................................................................................

2. OUTPUT DATA FIGURES ...............................................................................................................

SAMPLE DESIGN CALCULATION .........................................................................................................

ETABS DIAGRAMS .................................................................................................................................

The philosophy of seismic design can be summarized as follows:

2.1. Building Description

2.2. Location of the Site

2.3. Structural System

2.4. Frame System

2.5. Foundation System

The foundation system consists of isolated and strap footings.

2.6. Floor System

The floor system consists of 125 mm thick solid slabs.

Open-well staircase has been provided for this building.

3.1. Material Properties

Poisson’s ratio 0.2

Modulus of Elasticity (5000√fck) 25000.00 N/mm2 for M25

22360.67 N/mm2 for M20

4. Column Grid Plan

5. Dead / Live Load Calculation

5.1. Dead Loads

5.2. Live loads

5.3. Load Assessment

6. Calculation of Base Shear

6.1.1. Class of the Structure

The building is classified as a residential building.

6.1.2. Importance Factor

6.1.3. Zoning Factor

Seismic Zoning factor of 1 has been chosen as per IS NBC105.

6.1.4. Soil profile type

The Site is classified as sub soil category of Type II (Medium Site).

7. Analysis and Design

7.1. Level of Design

The design is considered as “Professionally Engineered Structure”.

7.2. Method of Seismic Analysis

7.2.1. Design Seismic Forces

7.3. Design and Detailing

7.4. Design of Structural Members

Deflection criteria for Beam: one side continuous

Maximum Span depth ratio 14.81

Span of corresponding beam 5.48 m

Depth of corresponding beam 400mm

Width of Corresponding beam 300 mm

Deflection criteria for Slab: two adjacent edges discontinuous

Critical Size of slab panel 3.02 m X 4.92 m

Calculated Short span to Effected depth ratio (L/d) = 28.78

Basic Value L/d ratio 26

Span Correction Factor 1

Modification factor for tension reinforcement 2

Compression reinforcement modification Factor 1

8. Load Cases and Combinations

8.1.1. Load Cases

i. Dead Load (DL)

8.1.2. Load Combinations

10. Concluding Remarks

11. Reference Codes

NBC 110: 1994 Plain and Reinforced Concrete

12. Reference Books

1. Input data figures

2. Output data figures

Sample Design calculation