Department of Education

NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES

Region IV – A CALABARZON

TRAINING STANDARDS

Standard 1. The training program is responsive to the participants’ needs and is aligned to
agency’s strategic direction (VMV) and policies.

Quality Principles:
- The training program is anchored on competency – based assessment of development needs
which should consider various assessment modes (refer to T and D Planning Subsystem) such
as self-assessment , validation observation and interview, performance indicators (RPMS),
etc.
- The training program meets the personnel development requirements of the agency
consistent with its mission-vision, mandate and strategic direction and priorities based on the
plan for professional development (IPPD, SPPD, MPPD) OF THE OFFICES.

Standard 2. The training program promotes inclusiveness and equity and is developed based on sound
learning and development principles

Quality Principles:
- The training program promotes equity and indusiveness
- Training design and methodologies and based on adult pedagogy
- The activities and content are logically sequenced and are aligned to the goals and objectives
of the program.
- The training resource package/s (session guide, presentation materials, presentation videos,
readings/support training materials, manuals, etc) is/are complete and comprehensive.
- The program identifies how learning can be assessed and applied in the work area.

Standard 3. The training program has management structure that identifies accountabilities and
responsibilities.

Quality Principles:
- The management structure delineates roles and responsibilities. At the minimum, the
management structure shall include the following:
1. Program Manager – Oversees the entire program, coordinates all efforts
2. Training Manager – focuses on actual training to ensure that the
program is implemented as planned.
3. Logistics Officer - plans and secures logistics to support the training
4. Welfare Officer – ensures that provisions for health, wellness, security
are taken cared of.
5. Finance Officer – oversees the efficient allocation of funds and timely
release as well as documentation for liquidation
6. M and E Coordinator – implements M and E activities and prepares
report
7. Trainers – delivers the training
8. Documenters/Secretariat
- Specific persons are assigned to perform tasks and responsibilities
- Persons assigned to specific task and responsibilities are chosen based on set qualifications.

Suggested Management Structure

Program Manager

TrainingTraining
Manager Welfare Officer Logistics Finance M and E
Manager Officer Officer Coordinator

Trainers Secretariat/Documenters
Standard 4. The training logistical arrangements ensure that participants’ learning is maximized

Quality Principles:
- The venue selected has met the requirements in terms of facilities, workspace, amenities
(comfort rooms, internet connectivity, provision for emergencies), security and safety,
accessibility
- The accommodation has met the requirements in terms of capacity, amenities (comfort
rooms, internet connectivity, provision for emergencies) security and safety, accessibility to
the training venue if separate from the venue.
- Food provision has met the requirements in terms of quantity, quality, diet requirements od
participants, etc.
- The training materials are available, adequate for all participants, relevant to the needs of
the participants, usable in their work areas
- The training support materials are available, adequate for needs of the participants and the
management staff.

Standard 5. The training program is delivered efficiently and effectively with competent management
staff and facilitators/trainers.

Quality Principles:
- The management staff and trainers are selected based on a set of criteria and requirements
of the training program
- The planned activities are conducted as scheduled and are facilitated well
- The participants’ enlistment/registration process as well as attendance monitoring is
systematic
- The class size is set at a manageable level
- The participants are engaged in activities that provide opportunities to maximize learning
and demonstrate what they have learned
- The training program is ICT-supported where feasible

Standard 6. The training has an M and E mechanism to ensure that the learners’ and agency’s
requirements of the training program.

Quality Principles:
- The M and E tools are consistent with the framework and standards
- The M and E work responsibilities are indicated
- The M and E data are gathered and processed immediately
- The M and E results are used to inform improvement efforts and policy decisions

Standards Broken Down Into Quality Principles and Tools

Standards Quality Principles Tools

THE QAME TOOLS

The developed QAME tools encompass the three phases of the training program. They also capture the
standards and quality principles that have been articulated in this document.

Tools of the Different Phases

Phase Tool
Pre- Implementation Tool 1 – Training Program design Evaluation
Tool 2 – Session Guide/Resource Package
Tool 3 – Pre-Implementation Evaluation
Program Tool 4- Session and Facilitators’ Evaluation
Implementation/Delivery
Tool 5 – On-Site Monitoring
 Post - Implementation Tool 6 – Program Evaluation
Tool 7 – Program Completion Report

STANDARDS AND TOOLS

The tools attempt to provide indicators for certain standards, which may correspond to one or more
standards.

Tools and Standards Capture

Tool Standard 1 Standard 2 Standard 3 Standard 4 Standard 5 Standard 6
Tool A
Tool B
Tool C
Tool D
Tool E
Tool F
Tool G

APPLICATION AND OPERATIONALIZATION OF STANDARDS

1. Coverage
The training program standards and tools shall be applied to
a. Trainings proposed and conducted by DepEd at all levels
b. Accreditation of Trainings submitted by non-DepEd Learning Service Providers (LSPs)
c. Certification of Trainings attended by DepEd personnel for purpose of promotion and
reclassification and other relevant personnel action

2. Responsible Officers
Office and Area of Responsibility

Office Area of Responsibility QAME Coverage

All Regional Office trainings, QA of Training Program Design,
through QAD Resource Packages, Pre-
Division Office Trainings Implementation Activities

M and E of Training Program

Implementation and Post-
Implementation Phases

Accreditation of non-DepEd
trainings and Learning Service
Providers in the Region

Certification of Trainings of
Regional Personnel and Division
Personnel except Head Teachers
and Principals

Evaluation of Action Plan and JEL

Implementation of the Personnel
who attended the training

3. Analysis of the M and E Results

Each level must ensure that the results of the M and E activities/data gathering are analysed and
should be submitted to NEAP – Region. The analysis must include major findings,
recommendations for improvement and policy implications.

4. Accreditation of Training and Non-DepEd Learning Service Providers

 Only accredited trainings shall be processed for certification. Accreditation of Training shall
follow general procedures as stated in the memo.

Learning Service Providers may also apply for institutional accreditation. An accredited LSP may
be allowed to conduct its training program without having to submit the full training proposal.
Instead a training brief may be required. The evaluation of LSP shall look at the following:
a. Organizational Personality – Recognized by SEC, Recognition in the Industry
b. Organizational Structure and Manpower including Pool of Trainers- Adequate and Expertise
in line with the program thrusts
c. Financial Standing
d. Facilities (Physical Infrastructure)
e. List of relevant trainings conducted
f. Other Requirements

The LSP should obtain a rating of at least 80% in order to be given accreditation. This
accreditation shall be valid for two years effective the issuance of certificate of accreditation.
After two years, the LSP should submit itself for renewal of accreditation.

The certificate of accreditation may be revoked by DepEd when upon investigation, the LSP has
clearly violated the terms of the accreditation. Grounds of revocation include but not limited to:
- Excessive fees (10% above authorized government rate)
- Failure to submit Training Program Completion Report 1 month after the conduct of the
training.
- Failure to comply with NEAP training standards
- Consistently low evaluation results.

5. Certification of Training
Trainings attended by DepEd personnel may be certified by the appropriate office for purpose of
promotion, reclassification and similar personnel action and for other related purposes.

Attendance to training can be considered for certification if it meets the following criteria:
1. The training program has been accredited by the appropriate DepEd Office
2. The participants has implemented an action plan as workplace application of
learning
3. The implementation of the action plan was monitored by the appropriate office
4. The implementation of the action plan and its impact was evaluated by the
appropriate office

Certification at the Regional Office

The Regional Office shall be responsible for the certification of trainings of personnel
other than head teachers and principals. As part of the certification process, the Regional Office
should ensure that the training action plan was monitored and evaluated
 Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
Region IV –A CALAABARZON

QAME Form A : Training Design Evaluation

TRAINING PROGRAM DESIGN EVALUATION
Title of the Training Program: Duration:
Target Participants: Number of Participants:
Proponent:
Directions: Rate the Training Design along the following standards by ticking/checking the column that
corresponds to your rating with 5 as the highest rating. Also, write your comments and
suggestions below to further improve the Session Guide. Thank you

Standard 1 2 3 4
1. The training Program is aligned to agency’s
strategic direction and priorities
(IPPD,SPPD,MPPD,RPMS)
2. The training program is based on
competency-based needs assessment (e..g.
NCBTS, NCBSSH, RPMS)
3. The training design builds on quality design
concepts and follows acceptable/standard
format and/or template.
4. Identification of participants promotes
inclusiveness and equity
5. Rationale, objectives, competencies being
addressed are aligned and relevant to DepEd
goals and objectives
6. Topics cover all competencies to be
developed
7. Content Sequence is logical
8. The resource package/s (session guide,
presentation materials, manuals, etc) is/are
complete, comprehensive and consistent
9. Schedule of activities is appropriately
sequenced and timed
10. Expected outputs are clear and may be
accomplished within reasonable time
11. Support materials and equipment identified
adequately support the program
12. The training design shows how the
participants can apply the KSAs learned from
the program
13. Training methodologies employ adult
learning principles
14. The training program is ICT - supported

Comments and Suggestions to improve the Program/Training Design: _____________________

______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
 Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
Region IV –A CALAABARZON
QAME Form B: Session Guide Evaluation

SESSION GUIDE EVALUATIION

Title of Session Guide:
Subject Area: Target User:
Directions: Rate the Session Guide along the following standards by ticking/checking the column that
corresponds to your rating to your rating with 4 as the highest rating. Also, write your comments
suggestions bellow to further improve the Session Guide. Thank you.

COMPONENTS AND STANDARDS 1 2 3 4

DESIGN
1. The Session Guide design is based on
contemporary/standard principles*
2. The SG contains the important elements of
objectives, duration of session, resource
materials needed, activities, etc.
CONTENT
3. Content is relevant to the objectives and
competencies that the session aims to develop
4. Information is up-to-date and accurate
5. Terminologies and expression are within the
learning area domain
6. Graphs, illustrations, pictures, if any are
accurate, relevant to and supports the content
presented
PROCESS
7. Process adopts adult pedagogy such as 4As,
Experiential Learning Cycle, etc. And is learner-
focused
8. Activities are aligned to objectives and doable
within the time bound
9. Expected outputs are doable within the time
allotment
LANGUAGE
10. Sentences and paragraphs are grammatically
correct
11. Ideas are clearly expressed (simple words,
expressions, simple and easy-to-follow
structure)
12. Language avoids bias along the line of gender,
religion, culture, etc.
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
13. General layout/format is visually pleasing
14. Choice of font (type style) and font size are
adopted to the requirements of the user
*adult pedagogy, constructivist, understanding by design, etc.

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS ; _____________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluated by : ___________________________________________ Date: ____________________________

 Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
Region IV –A CALAABARZON
QAME Form C: Standards for Program Management (Based on STRIVE – developed tool)

PROGRAM PRE-IMPLEMENTATION EVALUATION

Name of Service Provider: Region:
Learning Area/s Covered:
Direction: Rate to what extent the following standards have been met by the learning service provider (LSP) by
checking the column corresponding to your response with 4 as the highest rating.

STANDARDS 1 2 3 4
A. Training Program Management
1. Program Management
 Management structure with TOR is Clear
 Orientation for the staff detailing who will
do what, when, and of what quality was
done effectively.
 Inventory of training materials to check
adequacy and appropriateness was properly
done
 Inventory of support materials and
equipment to check availability, service
ability and adequacy was properly done.
 Logistical arrangements and responsiveness
to needs of the program was ensured
2. Trainers
 Have professional experience
 Possess expertise in the training program
content area
 Have attended the TOT
 Are physically fit
 Have strong personal/interpersonal
qualities
 Have very good communication and
analytical skills
 Are ICT literate
3. Documentation Staff
 Have very good written communication
skills
 Are ICT literate
 Have good personal/interpersonal skills
 Have positive attribute toward work
B. Program Operations (Attach Proposal and Description of Each with Pictures if possible)
1. Participation and Class Organization
 Participation is based on set criteria
 Participation maximizes representation
from target group
 Process of registration id clear
 Standard procedure for substitution
present
 Standard no. of participants is observed in
the organization of sessions and classes.
2. Venue
 Venue has adequate illumination
 Venue has adequate ventilation/cooling
system
 Venue is clean and hygienic
  Venue has enough number of comfort
rooms for participants
 Venue can accommodate the participants
comfortably
 Venue has enough facilities and space for
needed activities such as workshop.
3. Accommodation
 Accommodation can take in all participants
 Participants are comfortably accommodated
 Accommodation has clean, hygienic and
adequate number of comfort rooms
 Accommodation is close to the venue of the
training
 Accommodation is secure and safe
 Accommodation has provisions for
emergencies (medical, earthquake, fire)
4. Food
 Proposed menu offers generally healthy food
and with variety
 Proposed Menu consider diet
restrictions/requirements
5. Training Materials
 Training materials follow standard guidelines:
readability, quality of paper, etc.
 Training materials are adequate for all the
participants and are ready for the training
6. Support Materials and Equipment has been
conducted
 Inventory of support materials and equipment
has been conducted
 Provision for emergencies (medical, etc) is
provided

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS : ______________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________

EVALUATOR: ____________________________________________DATE ___________________

 Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
Region IV –A CALAABARZON
QAME Form D: SESSION EVALUATION TOOL

SESSION EVALUATION
( To be administered every after a session)
Session Topic:
Session Facilitator: Date:
Direction: Rate the session and the facilitator using the rating scale. Put a check/tick under the column
of the response.

SESSION Strongly Strongly

Agree Disagree
In this session... Agree Disagree
1. The topic was relevant to our area of work
2. The session was well planned
3. The objectives of the session was well planned
4. The time allotment for the topic was adequate
5. The activities were appropriate for adult
learners
6. Time to start and to end was observed
7. The learning materials were adequate and
relevant
8. The support materials were adequate
9. The participants were engaged in activities
10. The participants were able to demonstrate
their learning
FACILITATOR
The facilitator...
1. Exhibited full grasp of the topic
2. Was sensitive to the participants’ mood
3. Asked stimulating questions
4. Processed questions and responses to deepen
learning
5. Maintained positive learning environment
6. Expressed ideas clearly
7. Used appropriate training aids
8. Observed appropriate attire
9. Was able to firm up attainment of objectives
of the session

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS; ____________________________________________________________

Name of Participants (optional):

School (Optional)
Division and Region:
 Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
Region IV –A CALAABARZON
QAME Form E: On –site Monitoring

ON-SITE MONITORING AND EVALUATION

BASIC INFORMATION
REGION
DIVISION
LEARNING SERVICE PROVIDER
ACTIVITY/EVENT MONITORED
ADDRESS
INCLUSIVE DATES
DATE MONIITORED

No. of Trainers’ and No. of Participants

Subject Participant Trainers

Activities Strongly Strongly

Agree Disagree
Agree Disagree
A. Conduct of Program Delivery (Daily Monitoring)
1. Operational Concerns
 Activities starts and end according to schedule
 Attendance is systematically monitored
 Modification in activities and schedule are
consulted with the participants and are given
ahead of time.
 Provision of the following consistently follows
agreed standards
- Food
- Training Venue
- Accommodation
 Training Materials are adequate
 Support materials and equipment are available
and serviceable
 Issues and possible issues of action are identified
in the briefing and debriefing sessions
 Ground rules were clear and compliance was
monitored
2. Sessions and Trainers
 Trainers and sessions are evaluated using
standard tools
 Participants were given rapid competency
assessment before the session/s, if applicable
 Accomplished tools are collected from
participants immediately
 Responses are processed immediately
 Feedback is given as may be needed
B. Post Program Activities (At the end of the program)
1. Certification of Participants
 Certification is conferred upon completion of the
program and upon satisfaction of requirements
 Certification is issued at the end of the program
 2. Program Evaluation
 Program evaluation is administered immediately
after the last session
 Results of the evaluation is used and
incorporated in the end of the Program Report
 The participants were given assessed as regards
their learning (Rapid Competency
Assessment)

CRITICAL INCIDENTS: If you have encountered any remarkable event/situation (either positive or
negative) that needs to be detailed here, please accomplish the STAR form. You may need extra sheets to
accomplish this.

Situation/Task- Describe the specific situation and/or task that needed to be accomplished

Action – Describe how the person/s or the team responded to the situation or acted on the task at hand.

Result – Describe the effect of the action or lack of action

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS: __________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________

Monitoring Person ______________________________________________

Date: ______________________________

STAR FORM
(To be accomplished as may be Needed)
DATE SITUATION/TASK ACTION RESULT
 Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
Region IV –A CALAABARZON

PROGRAM EVALUATION
Respondent Type: _____ Trainee ______ Trainer _____ Program Manager
Name (Optional) ___________________________________ Sex __________

Program Title: ___________________________________________________ Date: _______________________

Direction: Please assess the effectiveness of the training program according to the indicators blow. Put a
tick/check under the appropriate column.

After the conduct of the training program, I believe that... Strongly Strongly
Agree Disagree
Agree Disagree
A. Program management
1. The training Program was delivered as planned
2. The training Program was manage efficiently
3. The training Program was well-structured
B. Attainment of Objectives
4. The program objectives were clearly presented
5. The program and session objectives were attained
C. Delivery of Content
6. Program content was appropriate to trainees’ roles and
responsibilities
7. Content delivered was based on authoritative and
reliable sources
8. The session activities were effective in generating
learning
9. Adult learning methodologies were used effectively
10. Management of learning was effectively structured
11. Contribution of all trainees were encouraged
12. Trainees demonstrated a clear understanding of the
content delivered
D. Provision of Support Materials
13. The support materials provided were appropriate to
the trainees’ needs
14. Support materials provided were adequate and were
given on time
E. Program Management Team
15. Program management Team members were courteous
16. Program Management Team was efficient
17. Program management Team was responsive to the
needs of trainees
F. Venue and Accommodation
18. The venue was well lighted
19. The venue was well –ventilated
20. The venue was comfortable with sufficient space for
program activities
21. The venue had sanitary and hygienic conditions with
adequate comfort rooms
22. Meals were nutritious and sufficient in quantity and
quality
23. Meals were generally well-prepared and tasty
24. The accommodation was comfortable with sanitary and
hygienic conditions
 Please provide your honest response to each of the following questions:
1. What do you consider your most significant learning from the program?
2. Briefly describe what you have learned and how it will help you with your work?
3. What changes would you suggest to improve similar programs in the future?
4. What farter comments do you have?

Source: NEAP – Central Office

Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
Region IV –A CALAABARZON

QAME FORM G:
PROGRAM COMPLETION REPORT

PROGRAM TITLE:

FACILITTATORS:

DURATION:

DATE:

NO. OF PARTICIPANTS Male: Female: Total:

(Attach name of participants per learning area) (Attachment 1)

Summary of Attendance: (Daily Attendance)

Executive Summary: At the end of program (Based on every day evaluation)

Program Objectives: At the end of the program, the participants will have:

Program Schedule/Matrix/Design

Key Results: (Identify the key results from the conduct of the program)

Resource Materials (Identify the resources required to conduct the program e.g. session guides, references, etc.)

M & E Analysis: (Based on the result of the End-of -Program Evaluation) Analysis should include:
 Results of the participants’ evaluation of the program.
 Results of the facilitator/session review of the program.
 Results from the program manager review of the program.
 Strengths and area for improvement should be identified in this section.

General Comments and Issues Encountered

In this section, make any general comments about the program and identify any issues in relation to:
 Its delivery
-Trainers/Facilitators
-Participants
-Content of the Program
- Delivery Strategies
- Training Materials
 Its Management
- Prior to Delivery
- During the training Proper

 Other Issues

Recommendation: In this section, discuss any recommendations you may have to improve future programs.
Suggestions may cover program management, facilitation, session guides, resource materials and other concerns.

Financial Report: Attach breakdown of board and lodging , honoraria, training materials, administrative cost,
profit margin
Attachments

Department of Education
NATIONAL EDUCATORS ACADEMY OF THE PHILIPPINES
Region IV –A CALAABARZON

QAME FORM G:
WORKPLACE APPLICATION OF LEARNING EVALUATION

Title of Training: ____________________ Venue: ___________________________

Inclusive Dates: _____________________
Implemented/Delivered/ Managed by:

Part 1: ACTION PLAN AND JOB-EMBEDDED LEARNING EVALUATION

Please rate the training participant along the following items:

ITEM Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree

ACTION PLAN MANAGEMENT
1. Action Plan responds to the need of the
school organization
2. Action Plan show learning from the
training attended.
3. Action Plan was implemented efficiently
4. Action Plan has satisfactorily achieved its
objectives.