Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Issue 2
Hyperconverged Infrastructure:
The CxO View
Simple, cost-effective infrastructure for today’s
business climate
In this issue
Today’s business climate carries ■■ 345% faster response time enabling faster reports,
a great deal of uncertainty queries and accelerating decision insights
for companies of all sizes and
industries. Unpredictable demand ■■ 220% more IOPS enabling more powerful workloads
makes it difficult to focus on to be accomplished in the same timeframe
long-term planning. Instead,
companies are looking for more ■■ 230% better value on price-performance for
short-term and shifting their greater savings
investments into only their most compelling projects.
What does all this performance get you? Here are
There is a strong push to simplify and reduce costs of some of the benefits:
IT infrastructure. Server virtualization was supposed to
consolidate and simplify IT infrastructure in data centers. ■■ Faster applications
But, that only “sort of happened”. Companies do have
fewer servers but they never hit the consolidation ratios ■■ Consolidate your infrastructure, cutting your
they expected. Why? In one word, performance. CAPEX
Surveys show that 61% of companies have ■■ Less operational costs (power, cooling and space
experienced slow applications after server efficiency)
virtualization with 77% pointing to I/O problems as
the culprit. ■■ Less time spent managing infrastructure
Now, with hyperconverged infrastructure, companies This means companies can run all their applications,
have another opportunity to fulfill their vision of even enterprise applications and databases, on the
consolidating and reduce the complexity of their fewest nodes of single-tier infrastructure, providing the
infrastructure. But, this will only happen if their highest ROI by minimizing both CAPEX and OPEX.
applications get the I/O performance they need.
It’s these kind of results and the advances in
DataCore Hyper-converged Virtual SAN is a high-
TM
performance and efficiency due to DataCore’s
performance, easy-to-use hyperconverged solution revolutionary Parallel I/O technology within our
that enables companies to massively consolidate hyperconverged solution that have led to over 30,000
their virtualized infrastructure. Unlike other customer deployments globally and 96% of CxOs
hyperconverged vendors, DataCore is the World’s surveyed stating they recommend DataCore.
fastest hyperconverged solution. Compared to All-
Flash Arrays (AFAs), DataCore has been proven to Sincerely,
have, at minimum:
George Teixeira
President and CEO, Co-founder
3
Impacts
■■ Hyperconverged integrated systems’ (HCIS’)
current lack of integration with existing traditional
infrastructures causes I&O leaders to position it as
silo deployments within enterprise data centers.
Recommendations
■■ Deploy HCIS to either consolidate all of the
midsize data center and remote office/branch
office (ROBO) workloads, or to address the specific
need for self-contained, high-impact workloads
such as VDI or virtual server infrastructure in large
enterprise data centers.
4
■■ Integrate HCIS as a new platform deployed to Today’s Hyperconverged systems range from
support well-defined, well-matched workloads and reference architecture software-only products (BYOS)
not as a one-size-fits-all server/storage alternative. to enterprise-grade hardware appliances, and
are targeted at enterprises of all sizes. By taking
■■ Create HCIS software-defined storage (SDS) advantage of the distributed scale-out nature of SDS
evaluation criteria, a test plan, and an analysis and elimination of single point of failure, HCIS is
tool that assigns heavier weighting to: data designed for high availability virtualized workloads.
reduction ratio; performance and scalability (all Vendors (see Note 1) include late-stage startups, tier-
for the worst-case scenario); customer support one server and storage OEMs, and enterprise software
capabilities and the HCIS vendor’s overall and hardware vendors.
supported ecosystem.
When deployed correctly, for appropriate workloads
■■ Create impact analyses of switching from and in the right deployment model, Hyperconverged
traditional storage to HCIS based on vendor infrastructure is a powerful architectural choice that
proposals and bids in the areas of procurement, can transform the modern data center. This research
facilities, networking, security, backup and disaster will explain the impact of hyperconvergence as an
recovery, and future technology deficits. alternative storage platform and how to achieve the
best possible outcomes from adopting this technology.
Strategic Planning Assumption
The first order of business is to understand how HCIS
By 2019, more than 50% of the storage capacity
address current pain points and deliver on simplicity,
installed in enterprise data centers will be deployed
flexibility, selectivity and economic promises.
with SDS or HCIS architectures based on x86
commodity hardware systems, up from 10% today.
HCIS systems have gained mind share and are being
considered as alternatives for traditional server
Analysis
and storage systems in the midmarket data center,
In today’s data-driven economy, more data creation greenfield opportunities, ROBO, data center renovation
translates immediately into increased storage and modernization projects for highly virtualized data
demands. In order for a business to grow rapidly, center workloads. Table 1 shows the benefits and
storage needs to be able to expand in an on-demand limitations of HCIS systems.
manner. Interest in HCIS is growing as organizations
of all sizes and market verticals seek to simplify,
speed up delivery, improve manageability and satisfy
user demand for more availability, performance and
storage capacity on tight IT budgets and with lean
resources.
5
Table 1. IT Benefits and Limitations of HCIS Versus Traditional Storage and Server Environment
Hyperconvergence is a relative newcomer to data platform with its own provisioning, management,
center platforms modernization. Figure 1 below backup and DR, and capacity planning tools.
shows critical differences that I&O leaders must know
before making a final decision to move away from the In order to avoid the data silo effect, the next
traditional storage/server environment. generation of HCIS will have to include some
integration capabilities with infrastructure outside of
Impacts and Recommendations the HCIS platform. For example, HCIS products will
have to gain the ability to ingest and control storage
HCIS’ current lack of integration with
on traditional storage arrays; present their own pool
existing traditional infrastructures
of SDS for consumption by other servers in the data
causes I&O leaders to position it as
center; and provision and support hybrid compute and
silo deployments within enterprise data storage in the cloud.
centers
While Hyperconverged solutions are targeted to Recommendations:
flatten the IT workspace and reduce the silo effect of ■■ Deploy HCIS to either: consolidate all of the
different infrastructure components, the majority of midsize data center and ROBO workloads or
vendor implementations are not designed to integrate to address the specific need for self-contained,
with existing IT investments such a storage or server high-impact workloads such as virtual desktop
farms, but rather to rip and replace them. That is infrastructure (VDI) or virtual server infrastructure
why HCIS is most often targeted and deployed as a in large enterprise data centers.
greenfield solution for a highly virtualized stack with
wide adoption in the midmarket segment, where the ■■ Prioritize HCIS vendor solutions that have
integration with outside compute and storage is less integration capabilities with existing data center
of a requirement. investments and that will support hybrid cloud
deployments.
HCIS data silo effect may derail deployments for
large enterprises when, instead of gaining operational
efficiency, HCIS may end up adding on another
6
The planned service life of an HCIS system does not Deploying a HCIS solution as alternative platform
have to align with server or storage system service within an enterprise can enable IT to quickly satisfy
lives because they will often be deployed as a silo or to the needs of a specific business application or
support a specific project or workload. workload by minimizing the testing needed to certify
its use with a variety of mission or business-critical
Differences in application needs and the value maps workloads. Examples include virtual servers, VDI
shown in Figure 3 indicate that cost-optimized or development/testing environments. Developing
infrastructures will align application needs with an extensible infrastructure and flexible operating
different technologies. Pursuing a coexistence strategy vision will help IT development by providing a viable
also has the advantages of keeping competitive alternative against unwanted shadow IT. While there
pressure on traditional storage and server suppliers are many qualitative arguments that are made in
to deliver aggressive pricing and effective postsales favor of a single storage platform, the architectural
service and support. efficiencies and the benefits of maintaining a
HCIS environment might outweigh the operational
complexity and additional training they may require.
8
■■ Integration: Some HCIS solutions allow integration The migration of existing workloads onto HCIS is likely
with existing data center infrastructure (such as to make I&O leaders to update their existing vendor
servers, storage or public cloud) while most do not agreements, SLAs, data center design, backup and
disaster recovery strategies, staffing and organization
■■ Data protection and availability: Some HCIS responsibilities
solutions include built-in snapshots, QoS backup
and sync remote replication HCIS performance profiles and mean time between
data loss (MTBDL) will differ from existing storage/
There are big differences between HCIS server infrastructures. Users should identify existing
performance, depending on hypervisor, SLAs that have been made obsolete and create new
software stack, hardware, VM density, SLAs that align with HCIS capabilities. Revising
workloads, caching and data reduction SLAs also creates an opportunity for users to cost-
optimize their operations by better aligning SLAs
technologies.
with application requirements, thereby reducing the
Recommendations: number of situations where the infrastructure is
■■ Include the following criteria when evaluating overdelivering against application needs. Common
HCIS: redundancy model, support and measures include guaranteed I/O rates, host visible
maintenance procedures, hypervisor support, and bandwidth, response times, availability, MTBDL,
method of providing SDS. recovery point objectives (RPOs), recovery time
objectives (RTOs) and $/GB costs.
■■ Create HCIS software-defined storage evaluation
criteria, a test plan and an analysis tool that Disaster recovery schemes that rely on proprietary
assigns heavier weighting to data reduction ratio; HCIS-based replication technologies can only work
performance and scalability (all for the worst-case with other HCIS-based systems in the same family and
scenario); customer support capabilities and the cannot work within existing disaster recovery schemes.
HCIS vendor’s overall supported ecosystem. If the user has a contract with a disaster recovery
provider or colocation company, there will be contracts
■■ Test HCIS solution performance under load as well to review and possible renegotiation. Possible areas
as data reduction ratios over time and at scale in of renegotiation could include bandwidth, power and
order to rightsize your cluster and finalize your space requirements, and the need to purchase a new
HCIS configuration. system at the disaster recovery site.
■■ Create a HCIS workload testing lab and perform Since HCIS systems are inherently more autonomic in
head-to-head testing by using real workloads or their operation and require less ongoing maintenance,
storage workload generators. One example is their deployment could create opportunities to
HCIbench, a free storage performance testing tool revise policies and procedures that have been made
for HCIS. obsolete by new technologies. As a result of HCIS
10
implementation, I&O leaders will be able to reorganize Note 1. Sample HCIS Vendors
operations to improve efficiency and free budget to ■■ Atlantis Computing
reskill the organization to make it profitable rather
than a cost center. ■■ Gridstor
Recommendations: ■■ Dell
■■ Build a cross-functional team that includes all
stakeholders to ensure the inclusion of current ■■ Hitachi
and future storage and application requirements,
senior management support and the creation of an ■■ HP
effective RFP that covers the subtle consequences,
detailed in this research, of deploying an SDS ■■ HTBase
HCIS solution in the data center.
■■ Maxta
■■ Engage with HCIS suppliers to profile candidate
storage workloads and create SLAs that align with ■■ Nutanix
HCIS SDS capabilities and application needs.
■■ Pivot3
■■ Create impact analyses of switching from
traditional storage to HCIS based on vendor ■■ Scale Computing
proposals and bids in the areas of procurement,
facilities, networking, security, backup and disaster ■■ SimpliVity
recovery, and future technology deficits.
■■ Springpath
Additional research contribution and review by Arun
Chandrasekaran, Mike Cisek, Dave Russell and ■■ StarWind Software
George Weiss
■■ Stratoscale
Evidence
■■ VMware
Evidence for this research includes more than 200
Gartner client inquiries in 2015; vendor interviews,
surveys and product demonstrations in 2014 and Source: Source: Gartner Research, G00292287,
2015; and customer reference surveys in 1H15. Julia Palmer and Stanley Zaffos, 15 January 2016
11
“This product makes you think differently about storage and ultimately is the next
step in virtualization. DataCore Hyper-converged Virtual SAN gives us the flexibility,
reliability and performance to keep our systems running non-stop. No other products I
looked at were even close to accomplishing this.”
As it turned out, Nelson got the “path forward’ he Delivering Real-time Data Redundancy
wanted with DataCore Hyper-converged Virtual SAN According to Nelson, “Now we are synchronously
in that he can now rely on one pane of glass (the mirroring to the other site. Before I may have been
DataCore management console) to manage the doing some snapshots to the other site – but that was
storage residing on NetApp, which he just serves up timed, managed and certainly not done in realtime.
to the DataCore servers as an extension to their local There certainly was no mirroring going on before and
disk space. latency was deplorable. Moreover, the old solution
would not allow us to failover to the backup site
After DataCore was implemented, NetApp was without migrating the systems, therefore taking them
relegated to being the low-end storage tier for use offline during that time. I knew that a special product
cases such as storage archiving applications that was needed to keep the systems running all of the
do not require a lot of throughput or performance. time. If our systems fail, it puts not only citizens but
DataCore allowed the investment in NetApp to be first responders at risk.”
protected.
Nelson has brought an entire host down, while everything Nelson explains that adding the third node was not
was moved over to the backup host and it was “invisible” particularly difficult – although he admits he is glad
according to him. “And then you can bring it back, which a Wizard exists that he can utilize in the future when
often is the problem,” he lauded. “DataCore does it all – necessary for configuring the additional nodes.
from failover to failback, all seamlessly.”
“DataCore did not even know that I added another
Key applications are all based on SQL Server, server because I just did it myself and turned it on,”
Exchange and Active Directory. One application ECSO stated Nelson. “What is more, I did not have to buy
has is very unique and that is a computer-aided any specific hardware. I could have bought a bunch of
dispatch application for Fire and Police. All of the data disk drives and just added those. DataCore gives me
is stored in SQL Server, but runs in a private cloud at the flexibility to build my environment how it needed to
ECSO’s data center. be built.”
In addition, the organization knew that it needed new About Emergency Communications of Southern
hosts, but Nelson was prescient enough to know that Oregon
he did not want to buy new hosts without solving the Beyond serving as a combined emergency dispatch
storage issue. It was during an introductory meeting facility and Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) for
with DataCore that Nelson began to understand all of the Jackson County Oregon 9-1-1 lines, ECSO is also a
the inherent benefits of embracing a hyperconverged regional “drop point” for emergency information that
infrastructure. When the lightbulb “went off,” Nelson needs to be given to Jackson and Josephine counties.
realized that hyperconverged was a strategy that This may include severe storm warnings or notice of
could be embraced immediately by a solution readily a foreign enemy attack. This information is received
available from DataCore – one wherein the host and through the National Air Warning Alert System
the storage were all in one box. (NAWAS) radio channel that covers the entire United
States. www.ecso911.com
“It was at that very moment that I thought – it fits our
price range and it gives us a way to use our existing
storage,” said Nelson. “It was a sheer breath of relief Source: DataCore
once I found the solution in DataCore Hyper-converged
Virtual SAN that I had been struggling for months to
find. By implementing DataCore we would be solving
multiple issues with one purchase.”