In search of a Multiple Access Scheme (MAS) for 5G

5G – the 5th Generation mobile technology might arrive at our door steps sooner than we
think, supporting 3 typical usage scenarios: enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB), massive
Machine Type Communication (mMTC) and Ultra-reliable Low Latency Communication
(URLLC) [1]. Though architecture wise 5G is different from its predecessors, like in any
other wireless communication technology, among many other things, the Multiple Access
Scheme (MAS) becomes the key for 5G and selecting the suitable scheme will ultimately
decide the future and success of 5G.

MAS (aka Multiple Access Method or Channel Access Method) is required when we have to
share a physical media. This is not only applicable to wireless, but also to many wired
networks including bus networks and ring networks. In wireless, MAS allows several User
Equipment (UE) connected to the same multi-point transmission medium to transmit over it
and to share the available radio capacity. MAS is based on a multiplexing method,
allowing several data streams or signals to share the same communication channel or
physical medium.

Multiplexing or muxing works by combining multiple analog or digital signals into one signal
over a shared medium. Space Division Multiplexing (SDM), Frequency Division Multiplexing
(FDM), Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) and Code Division Multiplexing (CDM) are some
examples. Therefore the MAS using FDM becomes Frequency Division Multiple Access
(FDMA), TDM becomes Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) and CDM becomes Code
Division Multiple Access (CDMA). In FDMA, each user has a small part of the resource
(spectrum) allocated all the time. In TDMA, each user has nearly all the spectrum allocated
at a small duration of time. In CDMA, each user has all the spectrum all the time. While
multiplexing is provided by the physical layer, multiple accesses also involves Media Access
Control (MAC) layer.

So, in summary, Multiplexing is combining many signals on one media, while MAS is
allowing many to access the media/resource at one time. Therefore, it can be stated that
Multiplexing is a technique and multiple accesses is the way to use that technique.

Over the years, different generations of mobile technologies used different MASs to achieve
different capabilities, more importantly the system capacity and spectral efficiency.
Note: AMPS-Advanced Mobile Phone System, GSM-Global System for Mobile
communications, UMTS-Universal Mobile Telecommunications System, LTE-Long Term
Evolution

All the above MASs (except CDMA), which can be called as conventional MASs, are
Orthogonal Multiple Access (OMA) technologies. In OMA, different users are allocated to
orthogonal resources in either time, frequency or code domain in order to mitigate Multiple
Access Interference (MAI). As the expectations or the objectives of 5G (higher data rates –
100/1000 times 4G, low latency – 1ms Round Trip Time (RTT), massive connectivity, high
density – 1M devices/km^2, enhanced indoor coverage etc.) are quite different from that of
4G and others, the Radio Access Technology (RAT), which is characterized by MAS, need
to be flexible, reliable, energy efficient, spectral efficient and support diverse Quality of
Service (QoS). OMA schemes are not sufficient to support these requirements, especially
massive connectivity and diverse QoS. [2], [3], [4]

It’s worthwhile to look little deeper on the scenario of mMTC and why the current LTE or
LTE- Advanced (LTE-A) will find it difficult to support mMTC. In LTE/LTE-A there are lot of
interactive processes between the Node B (NB)/enhanced NB (eNB) and the UE before
data is transmitted. This is ok for long time continuous sessions, as the signaling overhead
averaged over time is less. However, in mMTC used in Internet of Things (IoT), the “thing”
(including UE) transmits a small amount of data over s short period of time and there are
millions of such “things”. Now if we use LTE/LTE-A for such a scenario, the signaling
overhead suddenly becomes high and access efficiency becomes low.

Therefore, several Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Schemes are proposed for 5G,
especially to address the Machine-to-Machine (M2M) requirements. These include;
Superposition Coding based Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (SPC-NOMA), Multi –User
Shared Access (MUSA), Sparse Code Multiple Access (SCMA), Pattern Division Multiple
Access (PDMA), Resource Spread Multiple Access (RSMA), Non-orthogonal Coded
Multiple Access (NCMA) and Interleaver-Grid Multiple Access (IGMA). The different Non-
Orthogonal Multiple Access Schemes can be compared as below; [1], [5]
Note: UL-Uplink, DL-Downlink

When we design Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access Schemes, we need to consider following;

 Coverage
 Peak to Average Power Ratio (PAPR)
 Implementation Complexity
 Combination with Multiple –Input Multiple-Output (MIMO)
 Flexibility

Pictorially, TDMA, FDMA, CDMA, OFDMA and NOMA can be visualized as follows [6]. This
shows how different users (denoted by different colors) gets the allocation of spectrum.
While there are multiple candidates for the 5G MAS in non-orthogonal domain, none of
them seems to be a perfect choice at this point of time. As different schemes have both
their merits and demerits, it’s likely that a combination of different MASs, including the
conventional orthogonal schemes, will be used in 5G to achieve different objectives.
However, as we get closer to 2020, where the finalized standards are expected to be
released, more improvements on different schemes are possible with the expectation of all
new schemes or approaches to combine different schemes. At the meantime, Research &
Development Engineers and scientists will be quite busy discovering, improving and
innovating the finest ingredients for the success of 5G.

References

 [1] SUN Qi, WANG Sen, HAN Shuangfeng et al., “Unified Framework Towards
Flexible Multiple Access Scheme for 5G” ZTE Communications, vol. 14, no. 4, pp.
26-33, October. 2016. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5188.2016.04.004
 [2] WEI Zhiqiang, YUAN Jinhong, Derrick Wing Kwan Ng, et al., “A Survey of
Downlink Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access for 5G Wireless Communication
Networks” ZTE Communications, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 17- 23, October. 2016. doi:
10.3969/j.issn.1673-5188.2016.04.003
 [3] Volker Jungnickel, Konstantinos Manolakis, Wolfgang Zirwas et al., “The Role of
Small Cells, Coordinated Multipoint, and Massive MIMO in 5G” IEEE
Communications Magazine, pp. 44-51, May. 2014.
 [4] Peng Wang, Jun Xiao, Li Ping, “Comparison of Orthogonal and Non-Orthogonal
Approaches to Future Wireless Cellular Systems”.
 [5] YAN Chunlin, YUAN Zhifeng, LI Weimin et al., “Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access
Schemes for 5G” ZTE Communications, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 11-16, October. 2016.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5188.2016.04.002
 [6] Mahyar Shirvanimoghaddam, Sarah J. Johnson, “Multiple Access Technologies
for Cellular M2M Communications” ZTE Communications, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 11-16,
October. 2016. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5188.2016.04.006