Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.0 Introduction
M/s GawarConstruction Ltd. (the "Contractor") has been awarded the project through
International Competitive Bidding. The Contractor, M/sGawar ConstructionLtd.has appointed
“Nu-Infra Engineering Pvt. Ltd.” as design Consultants for providing necessary technical
support. This report highlights the “Traffic Surveys &Analysis” undertaken for the project
highway in greater details.
The project road under this study is the section of Ambikapur – Kerta – Jagannathpur –
Pratappur starting from Ambikapur at Km 0.000 and ends at Km 40.498 in the state of
Chhattisgarh. The major settlements coming along the project road areAmbikapur and Pratappur.
The total length of the project road is 40.498 Km as per km stone.
The primary objective of traffic studies is to estimate the number of commercial vehicles that
would likely ply on the proposed road for the purpose of pavement design. The first step is to
determine the base year traffic (ADT in 2017) and for this purpose CVC surveys have been
conducted along project road locations at Km. 5.000, Km. 21.000&Km. 30.000.
The following table gives details of various traffic surveys conducted with location and period of
survey. A key plan showing the traffic survey locations is given below in fig 3.1.
Table 3.1 – Traffic Survey Locations & Period of Survey
Period
Sl. No Type of Survey Duration Location
From To
14-03-
1 Classified Volume Count 7 Days Km. 5.000 07-03-2017
2017
14-03-
2 Classified Volume Count 7 Days Km. 21.000 07-03-2017
2017
14-03-
3 Classified Volume Count 7 Days Km. 30.000 07-03-2017
2017
11-03-
4 Axle Load Survey 1 Day Km. 21.000 10-03-2017
2017
The CVC survey conducted is analyzed in order to obtain the following traffic characteristics:
The CVC survey was conducted continuously between 12.00 PM on the start date to 12.00 AM
on the concluding date. Following table presents summary of total traffic observed at the count
locations. Detailed location-wise analyses are presented in Appendix 4.1.
Table 4.1 – Average Daily Traffic (ADT)Ambikapur to Pratappur Road
Tollable Vehicle
1 Car 80 80
2 Mini-Bus 4 6
3 Bus 9 27
4 LCV 17 26
5 2 Axle 6 18
6 3 Axle 7 21
7 4-6 Axle 248 1116
Others (Specify)
8 0 0
Crane/JCB/Combine
Non-Tollable Traffic
9 2W 313 157
10 Tractor with Trailer 37 167
11 Tractor without Trailer 11 17
12 Cycle 13 7
13 Rickshaw 0 0
14 Animal Drawn 0 0
Tollable Vehicle
3 Bus 40 120
14 Animal Drawn 1 6
Tollable Vehicle
1 Car 96 96
2 Mini-Bus 4 6
3 Bus 9 27
4 LCV 24 36
5 2 Axle 88 264
6 3 Axle 57 171
7 4-6 Axle 22 99
Others (Specify)
8 0 0
Crane/JCB/Combine
Non-Tollable Traffic
9 2W 378 189
10 Tractor with Trailer 43 194
11 Tractor without Trailer 11 17
12 Cycle 15 8
13 Rickshaw 0 0
14 Animal Drawn 0 0
2A 3A M Axle Others
Location Car Mini Bus Bus LCV
Truck Truck Truck (Specify)
In nos.
Km. 5.000 21.56 1.08 2.43 4.58 1.61 1.89 66.85 0.00
In PCU
Km. 5.000 6.18 0.46 2.01 10.03 1.39 1.62 86.25 0.00
It can be seen from the above tables 4.1 and 4.4 that considerable volume of traffic i.e.1642PCU
is flowing at Km.5.000 on this road. Approx. 21.19% of traffic (in terms of PCU) is non tollable
Consisting of 2 Wheelers, Tractors and Cycles. In the fast moving category, consisting of cars,
buses and trucks – cars are 21.56%, buses and trucks are 78.44 % in terms of nos and in terms of
PCU cars are approx. 6.18%, buses and trucks are 93.82%.
2A 3A M Axle Others
Location Car Mini Bus Bus LCV
Truck Truck Truck (Specify)
In nos.
Km. 21.000 24.49 1.56 2.08 6.54 2.23 1.30 61.75 0.05
In PCU
Km. 21.000 7.39 0.7 1.88 2.96 2.02 1.17 83.83 0.05
It can be seen from the above tables 4.2 and 4.5 that considerable volume of traffic i.e.8567PCU
is flowing at Km. 21.000 on this road. Approx. 25.43% of traffic (in terms of PCU) is non
tollableConsisting of 2Wheelers, Tractors and Cycles. In the fast moving category, consisting of
cars, buses and trucks – cars are 24.49%, buses and trucks are 75.51 % in terms of nos and in
terms of PCU cars are approx. 7.39%, buses and trucks are 92.61%.
Table 4.6 – Summary of Traffic Composition (Fast moving) at Km.30.000
2A 3A M Axle Others
Location Car Mini Bus Bus LCV
Truck Truck Truck (Specify)
In nos.
Km. 30.000 32.00 1.33 3.00 8.00 29.33 19.00 7.3461.75 0.00
In PCU
Km. 30.000 13.73 0.86 3.86 5.16 37.77 24.46 14.16 0.00
It can be seen from the above tables 4.3 and 4.6 that, considerable volume of traffic i.e.1107PCU
is flowing at Km. 30.000 on this road. Approx. 36.85% of traffic (in terms of PCU) is non
tollable Consisting 2Wheelers, Tractors and Cycles. In the fast moving category, consisting of
cars, buses and trucks – cars are 32.00%, buses and trucks are 68.00 % in terms of nos and in
terms of PCU cars are approx. 13.73%, buses and trucks are 86.27%.
The analysis of hourly traffic variation is helpful in identifying the % of peak hour traffic flow to
the total ADT. The hourly variation of traffic is presented in the figure 4.1
200
150
100
50
0
3.00 Am to 4.00 Am
1.00 Am to 2.00 Am
2.00 Am to 3.00 Am
4.00 Am to 5.00 Am
5.00 Am to 6.00 Am
6.00 Am to 7.00 Am
7.00 Am to 8.00 Am
8.00 Am to 9.00 Am
12.00 Pm to 13.00 Pm
13.00 Pm to 14.00 Pm
14.00 Pm to 15.00 Pm
15.00 Pm to 16.00 Pm
16.00 Pm to 17.00 Pm
17.00 Pm to 18.00 Pm
18.00 Pm to 19.00 Pm
19.00 Pm to 20.00 Pm
20.00 Pm to 21.00 Pm
21.00 Pm to 22.00 Pm
22.00 Pm to 23.00 Pm
9.00 Am to 10.00 Am
11.00 Am to 12.00 Pm
23.00 Pm to 24.00 Am
10.00 Am to 11.00 Am
24.00Am to 1.00 Am
0
1000
200
600
800
400
12.00 Pm to 13.00 Pm
13.00 Pm to 14.00 Pm
Location
Km 5+000
14.00 Pm to 15.00 Pm
15.00 Pm to 16.00 Pm
16.00 Pm to 17.00 Pm
17.00 Pm to 18.00 Pm
18.00 Pm to 19.00 Pm
19.00 Pm to 20.00 Pm
20.00 Pm to 21.00 Pm
Peak Hour
21.00 Pm to 22.00 Pm
19.00PM to 20.00PM
22.00 Pm to 23.00 Pm
23.00 Pm to 24.00 Am
24.00Am to 1.00 Am
1.00 Am to 2.00 Am
2.00 Am to 3.00 Am
157
(PCU)
3.00 Am to 4.00 Am
4.4. Average Hourly Variation of Traffic Volume at Km. 21+000
4.00 Am to 5.00 Am
Table 4.7 – Peak Hour Traffic Volume
5.00 Am to 6.00 Am
the total ADT. The hourly variation of traffic is presented in the figure 4.2
6.00 Am to 7.00 Am
7.00 Am to 8.00 Am
Fig 4.2 Hourly Variation of Traffic (IN PCU) at km. 21+000
8.00 Am to 9.00 Am
9.56
9.00 Am to 10.00 Am
10.00 Am to 11.00 Am
11.00 Am to 12.00 Pm
Peak Hour Factor
The analysis of hourly traffic variation is helpful in identifying the % of peak hour traffic flow to
20
40
60
80
0
100
12.00 Pm to 13.00 Pm
13.00 Pm to 14.00 Pm Location
14.00 Pm to 15.00 Pm
Km 21+000
15.00 Pm to 16.00 Pm
16.00 Pm to 17.00 Pm
17.00 Pm to 18.00 Pm
18.00 Pm to 19.00 Pm
19.00 Pm to 20.00 Pm
20.00 Pm to 21.00 Pm
Peak Hour
21.00 Pm to 22.00 Pm
22.00 Pm to 23.00 Pm
15.00PM to 16.00PM
23.00 Pm to 24.00 Am
24.00Am to 1.00 Am
1.00 Am to 2.00 Am
2.00 Am to 3.00 Am
674
(PCU)
3.00 Am to 4.00 Am
4.5. Average Hourly Variation of Traffic Volume at Km. 30+000
4.00 Am to 5.00 Am
Table 4.8 – Peak Hour Traffic Volume
5.00 Am to 6.00 Am
the total ADT. The hourly variation of traffic is presented in the figure 4.3
6.00 Am to 7.00 Am
7.00 Am to 8.00 Am
Fig 4.3 Hourly Variation of Traffic (IN PCU) at km. 30+000
8.00 Am to 9.00 Am
9.00 Am to 10.00 Am
7.86
10.00 Am to 11.00 Am
11.00 Am to 12.00 Pm
Peak Hour Factor
The analysis of hourly traffic variation is helpful in identifying the % of peak hour traffic flow to
Table 4.9 – Peak Hour Traffic Volume
Traffic growth rates (based on IRC 37:2012) are given in the following table.
Car 5.00%
Bus/Mini Bus 5.00%
LCV 5.00%
2A Trucks 5.00%
3A Trucks 5.00%
MAV 5.00%
The base year traffic given in Table 4.1, 4.2 & 4.3 has been projected for the period of 15 years
with the above growth rates and given in the following table. This data further have been used in
the design of pavement thickness.
Table 5.2 – Projected traffic (nos.) 5+000
Truck
Year Car Mini Bus Bus LCV
2A 3A 4-6A
2017 80 4 9 17 6 7 248
2018 84 4 9 18 6 7 260
2019 88 4 9 19 6 7 273
2020 92 4 9 20 6 7 287
2021 97 4 9 21 6 7 301
Truck
Year Car Mini Bus Bus LCV
2A 3A 4-6A
Truck
Year Car Mini Bus Bus LCV
2A 3A 4-6A
2017 90 4 9 24 88 57 22
2018 95 4 9 25 92 60 23
2019 100 4 9 26 97 63 24
Axle load survey was carried out to get the spectrum of vehicle loading pattern of
commercial vehicles to estimate the repetitions of single, tandem and Tridem axles in
each direction expected during the design period and also to arrive at Vehicle Damage
Factor (VDF). The survey is carried out using portable weigh pads, for 24 hrs duration.
Mini Bus, Full Bus, LCV, Axle loads of 2 & 3 axle trucks, and multi axle trucks are
recorded on random basis. The Axle load frequency data & analysis is presented in
Appendix 4.1 and summary is presented below:
The vehicle damage factor/ equivalent single axle (ESAL) load factor is a multiplier to convert
the number of commercial vehicles of different axle loads and axle configuration to the number
of standard axle load repetitions. It is defined as equivalent number of standard axles per
commercial vehicle. The VDF varies with the vehicle axle configuration, axle loading, terrain,
type of road and from region to region.
As per section 4.4, IRC: 37-2012, the following equations have been used for computing
equivalency factors for single, tandem and Tridem axles for converting different axle load
repetitions into equivalent standards axle load repetitions (ESAL).
(𝑎𝑥𝑙𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑛𝐾𝑁)4
Single axle with single wheel on either side =
65
(𝑎𝑥𝑙𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑛𝐾𝑁)4
Single axle with dual wheel on either side =
80
(𝑎𝑥𝑙𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑛𝐾𝑁)4
Tandem axle with dual wheel on either side =
148
(𝑎𝑥𝑙𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑛𝐾𝑁)4
Tridem axle with dual wheel on either side =
240
In order to convert the ESAL into VDF, the frequency distribution of ESAL for each category of
vehicle and weighted average of ESAL is calculated to arrive at the VDF for that category of
vehicle. Detailed calculations are given in Appendix 4.1 and summary is presented below:
Table 6.1 - Axle Load Survey Summary at Km. 21+000
AMBIKAPUR TO PARTAPPUR TO
Sample
PARTAPPUR AMBIKAPUR
Total
Adopted
Type of Vehicle Nos of
VDF
Veh.
No. of
(%) No. of Veh. VDF VDF
Veh.
Based on the vehicle damage factors and the projected traffic volumes, the traffic loading in
terms of cumulative number of equivalent 8.16 t standard axle loads have been computed for the
design period and shown in the following table.
Table 7.0 – Cumulative Standard Axle (MSA) km. 5+000
Since Since
VDF 0.34 0.21 0.54 4.41 13.95 7.69
2017 2018
Construction
2017 4 9 17 6 7 248 0.37
Period Years
2018 0.40
4 10 18 6 8 267 0.40
2019 0.42
5 10 19 7 8 280 0.82
2020 0.44
5 11 20 7 8 294 1.27
2021 0.46
5 11 21 7 9 309 1.73
2022 0.49
5 12 22 8 9 324 2.22
2023 0.51
5 12 23 8 10 341 2.73
2024 0.54
6 13 25 9 10 358 3.27
2025 0.56
6 14 26 9 11 375 3.83
2026 0.59
6 14 27 10 11 394 4.42
2027 0.62
7 15 28 10 12 414 5.05
2028 0.65
7 16 30 11 12 435 5.70
2029 0.69
7 17 31 11 13 456 6.39
2030 0.72
8 17 33 12 14 479 7.11
2031 0.76
8 18 34 12 14 503 7.86
2032 0.79 8.66
9 19 36 13 15 528 8.66 15 Years
Table 7.1 – Cumulative Standard Axle (MSA) km. 21+000
Sinc
e Since
VDF 0.34 0.21 0.54 4.41 13.95 7.69
201 2018
7
Constructi
2017 30 40 126 43 25 1190 1.78 on Period
Years
2018 1.92
32 43 136 46 27 1280 1.92
2019 2.02
34 45 142 49 28 1344 3.94
2020 2.12
36 47 149 51 30 1412 6.05
2021 2.22
37 50 157 54 31 1482 8.27
2022 2.33 10.6
39 52 165 56 33 1556 1
2023 2.45 13.0
41 55 173 59 34 1634 6
2024 2.57 15.6
43 58 182 62 36 1716 3
2025 2.70 18.3
45 61 191 65 38 1802 3
2026 2.84 21.1
48 64 200 68 40 1892 7
2027 2.98 24.1
50 67 210 72 42 1986 4
2028 3.13 27.2
53 70 221 75 44 2086 7
2029 3.28 30.5
55 74 232 79 46 2190 5
2030 3.45 34.0
58 77 243 83 48 2299 0
2031 3.62 37.6
61 81 256 87 51 2414 2
2032 3.80 41.4 41.42
64 85 268 92 53 2535 2 15 Years
Table 7.2 – Cumulative Standard Axle (MSA) km. 30+000
Since Since
VDF 0.34 0.21 0.54 4.41 13.95 7.69
2017 2018
Construction
2017 4 9 24 88 57 22 0.25
Period Years