Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 11
According to Pearce, Barbier and Markandya (2013) in simple terms sustainability is the
process of conducting economic development without depleting all natural resources that is
using the resources in logical way to preserve the resource for future generations. However
overuse of scarce resources, high level of pollution, negative effects of green house gas are
some of the situations which are threatening the global sustainability. The current report
focuses on evaluating the meaning of sustainable development and identifies the human
impacts on the environment. Further the report will also highlight the changes that have taken
As per the definition provided by the Sustainable Development Commission, 2011, the term
sustainable development is the process of meeting the needs of the present generation along
with preservation of the resources for the future generations so that the future generations are
also able to meet their needs. Reid (2013) argued that high focus on sustainable development
for preservation of the resources for the future generations may sometimes lead to depriving
the present generations. Moreover, Warburton (2013) stated that sustainable development can
also be termed as the process of maintaining a balance between the human needs that leads to
the improvement of the lifestyles of the humans in the present scenario. Thus it can be stated
the sustainable development assures economic growth along with protection of the
environment and preservation of resources. As per the definition provided by the World
the process of achieving both economic and social development in a planned manner that
the effect of the human activities on biophysical activities, environments and biodiversity.
Population growth: According to Ghimire and Pimbert (2013) one of the reasons behind
environmental degradation is the rising human population. With progress in the medical
science, the global death rate has been reduced and hence the increment in pollution is
effecting the environment. With increase in population the accumulation of man-made wastes
are also increasing which is non transformable in nature and is thus effecting the aesthetics of
the environment. Trenberth et al. (2014) stated that with increase in population requirement
for food and shelter are also increasing and hence trees and water bodies are being cleared in
order to build shelter. Further the extraction of non renewable resources and consumption of
high levels of food, grains and minerals are also threatening the future supply of these
Use of non renewable fuels: Non renewable fuels or commonly known as the fossil fuels are
limited in nature, thus the excessive use of these energy sources leads to depletion of the
energy sources. However Martens (2014) stated that excessive use of fossil fuels like coal,
natural gas, nuclear energy etc leads to occurrences of high pollution and global warming.
Pollution: Lelieveld et al. (2015) stated that growing rate of pollution is a common difficulty
that is faced globally. Some of the man-made pollutions include, air pollution, noise
pollution, soil, radioactive ad thermal pollution. As per the reports of WHO, around 98% of
the cities within low and medium income countries have recorded high levels of air, water
the farmers do not have sufficient amount of monetary fund’s to improve the agricultural
machines and replace old and dead trees with new plantation, the farmers generally start
using new piece of land for the same farming process. This initiative leads to loss of potential
agricultural lands leading to unsustainable farming practices. The lack of effective taxation
policies, subsidies to farmers and pricing policies made by the government are the major
Biodiversity loss: With increment in human population levels, alteration of lands and water
bodies to constructional lands are resulting in biodiversity loss. Further Newby et al. (2015)
commented that illegal wildlife trade is also responsible for the loss of habitat. The irrational
behaviour of the humans in illegally trading the rare animals and species by transporting them
from its place of origination to other places, may sometimes lead to death of the species.
Population and over consumptions are also acting as the causes behind the high biodiversity
loss.
The following changes have been indentified in relation to the potential damages that are
Global warming: Global warming majorly caused by the high level of pollution changes the
climate and the temperature of the environment. McKinnon et al. (2015) stated that some of
the major environmental changes that have been noticed as an after effect of global warming
includes melting of ice glaciers, increase in temperature levels, delay in monsoon arrivals,
high rates of droughts, high frequencies of hurricanes, rise in the sea levels, shortage of food
occurrence of the process of Eutrophication. Mowforth and Munt (2015) stated that in
eutrophication the water bodies are enriched with additional and excess amount of fertilizers
which contains high amounts of nitrates and phosphates that in turn initiates the development
of algae formation on the water surface. The eutrophication process results in formation of
bad smelling water bodies, reduces the number of harvestable fish resources, reduces the
level of oxygen in the water thereby killing water bodies and decreases the rate of water
transparency.
change. The high rates of carbon dioxide when mixed with the salty ocean water tends to
produce carbonic acid which makes the surface water of the ocean acidic in nature and leads
to shell growth in the marine animals. Further, Severo et al. (2015) commented that
acidification also reduces the reproductive rate of majority of the fishes thereby depleting the
marine resources.
Damage to ozone layer: The increasing rate of air pollution and the high rates of green house
gas emissions have been a major concern for the scientists since these human pollution
phenomenon are causing potential damage to the protective ozone layer in the earth’s
atmospheric layer (Lam and Lai 2015). The mixture of the Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and
other halogenated ozone depleting substances (ODS) are majorly responsible for the
reduction of the amount of Ozone in the stratosphere. Lam and Lai (2015) stated that high
rates of CFCs generated from the man made green houses will lead to harm caused by the UV
Newby et al. (2015) stated that from the time the term “global warming” has been used for
denoting the rising temperature of the earth, there has been substantial amount of debate over
the realistic existence of the concept of global warming. As per the reports of the National
Geography, a thermometer record kept for about a century shows that the overall temperature
of the earth has raised by around 1 degree Fahrenheit for over the period.
In the midst of the high negative effects of global warming, there has always been a debate
about the percentage of contribution of the humans in causing Global warming. As a report
present in The Guardian, around 97% of the Nasa scientists have confirmed the fact that
global warming has been majorly caused by negative human interaction with environment
(Nuccitelli 2017). The scientist at Nasa has been arguing the fact that humans have been
responsible for global warming since 1950, however a minority of 4% have provided
evidences suggesting the fact that humans are actually half responsible for global warming
and the other half of the responsibility should be attributed to the natural environment.
Mowforth and Munt (2015) stated that if only the CO2 emission levels are considered as a
major cause behind the global warming then it will look like humans are the major factor
responsible for the situation. However in order to assess the global warming three major
cycles should be considered namely the natural cycle, natural variation cycle and
Milankovitch cycle. As per these cycles natural variation in the temperature after a prolonged
time period will occur despite any human interventions. Martens (2014) stated that as per the
natural cycle, after prolonged period of warm temperature naturally prolonged period of cold
temperature will arise and the cycle will move on. Hence it is not rational to indicate that
Similarly the climate changes occurring from the global warming are also being questioned
by different scientists. As per the reports of The Independent, 2016 has been recorded as the
hottest year thrice in a row where the global temperature was around 1.1 degrees Celsius
above the pre industrial level. Severo et al. (2015) stated occurrences of climate changing
phenomenon like melting of glaciers causing floods, late monsoons causing drought,
disappearances of islands due to increment in sea levels and destruction of underwater and
territorial animals due to diverse temperatures confirms the fact that the climate is changing
drastically. Trenberth et al. (2014) stated that even in this case the extent of human
As per the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change, Co2 emissions caused
by human activities are the major reason behind the climate changes. However the
Environment and public works Committee have argued that around 200years ago the amount
of CO2 was higher in comparison to the current amounts. Thus only Co2 emission cannot be
the sole reason behind the climate changes (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
2014). Further reports of US National Climate Assessment shows that excessive burning of
coals, oil, gas and forests have increased the level of air pollution. Further the satellites
measuring the output level of sun confirms that there has been no increase in the heat level of
the sun in the past 10 years. Thus it can be concluded that man made activities are changing
the climate.
Warburton (2013) stated that even if for sake of argument it can be assumed that CO2 levels
are not solely responsible for environmental degradation, however it can be suitably stated
without any debate that water pollution causing eutrophication is primarily a man made
activity. Human activities including throwing of wastes in water bodies, using water bodies
as outlets for factory wastes, usage of water bodies for cleaning and cooking purposes etc,
has significantly contributed to the development of eutrophication. As per the reports of the
WHO, around 90% of the domestic wastes thrown by the humans in the water bodies contain
Ocean acidification is also caused by the human interaction. Reid (2013) stated that
deforestation; high levels of fossil fuel consumption, emissions from the power plants and
cars are the major contributing reasons behind the cause of acidification. Hanna and Oliva
(2015) stated that another important aspect can be highlighted showing the high rates of
decreasing trend in biodiversity. As per the National Geographic surveys, the current
extinction rates of different rare species have been reaching to around 1000 times compared
to past extinction rates. Over population resulting in over consumption, forest and habitat
clearance and genetic dislocation are some of the reasons behind the biodiversity loss
Newby et al. (2015) stated that if the environmental degradation continues at the same pace
along with the high global warming, within next 20 years, the earth will be deprive of all
natural resources and most of the marine bodies along with vegetation will be destroyed. For
instance, the growing rate of eutrophication will result in loss of harvestable fish resources
that will eventually results in lack of marine foods. Further the unsustainable farming
practices will result in loss of potential agricultural lands which will hinder the growth and
production of food grains in future. As per the reports of The Guardian, the economic
changes can help in repairing the climate change. Due to the financial crisis which started in
2007, the government has been force to implement different subsidies on the policies and use
of the minerals and fossil fuels. Thus some of the prominent policies like the emissions
trading schemes, Carbon allowance prices etc, has helped in restricting the use of the harmful
Carbon dioxide by the humans. Warburton (2013) stated that the emissions trading scheme
states that excess of the mentioned CO2 level emissions will be charged. This initiative will
help in reducing the amount of CO2 emissions and will in turn help in protecting the climate.
Further in order to control the electricity consumption, the countries are also increasing the
per unit price of electricity which will help them to significantly control the consumption of
Furthermore, Lelieveld et al. (2015) commented that before it is too late, the official
organizations are trying to incorporate different schemes and strategies that will significantly
contribute to the management of the climatic change factors. The Scottish Environment
Protection Agency (SEPA) which was established in 2011 has taken the initiative of Zero
waste Scotland (ZWS) which is a strategy to reduce the waste amount in different parts of
Scotland. The scheme aims in generating awareness among the citizens of Scotland on the
amount of waste that is being produced and the awareness on the total concept of different
types of waste. Further the scheme also focuses on developing benchmark along with the
local authorities for the reduction and control of wastes (www.sepa.org.uk 2017).
The United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) is also formed as an operating agency of
the United Nations that helps in coordinating the environmental activities by implementing
different environmentally sound policies and practices. The activity under this regulatory
body covers the aspects of environmental governance, green climate establishment, issues for
resolving the atmospheric pollutions etc. Thus with the help of these human interventions in
the present scenario it has been possible to reduce the proximity of global warming and also
Conclusion
The discussion on the sustainability and human interaction with environment shows that
human interaction will environment are the major reasons behind the global warming and the
climate change issues. Throughout the discussion there has been a generation of debate
regarding the extent of human involvement in the deterioration of the environment. However
there have been instances that have been projected by the Nasa and other organizations that
confirms the fact that even natural cycles are also responsible for the climate changes. Further
the initiatives taken presently by the different organizations and the scientists shows that the
rate of environmental degradation has been reduced and if this initiatives are continued then
Ghimire, K.B. and Pimbert, M.P., 2013. Social change and conservation (Vol. 16).
Routledge.
Hanna, R. and Oliva, P., 2015. The effect of pollution on labor supply: Evidence from a
Lam, J.S.L. and Lai, K.H., 2015. Developing environmental sustainability by ANP-QFD
approach: the case of shipping operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, pp.275-284.
Lelieveld, J., Evans, J.S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D. and Pozzer, A., 2015. The contribution of
outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature, 525(7569),
pp.367-371.
Martens, P., 2014. Health and climate change: modelling the impacts of global warming and
McKinnon, A., Browne, M., Whiteing, A. and Piecyk, M. eds., 2015. Green logistics:
Mowforth, M. and Munt, I., 2015. Tourism and sustainability: Development, globalisation
http://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/global-warming-real/
Forastiere, F., Franchini, M., Franco, O.H., Graham, I. and Hoek, G., 2015. Expert position
paper on air pollution and cardiovascular disease. European heart journal, 36(2), pp.83-93.
Nuccitelli, D. 2017. The 97% v the 3% – just how much global warming are humans
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/sep/15/97-
Pearce, D., Barbier, E. and Markandya, A., 2013. Sustainable development: economics and
Severo, E.A., de Guimarães, J.C.F., Dorion, E.C.H. and Nodari, C.H., 2015. Cleaner
the Guardian. 2017. Economic crisis gives us a chance of repairing climate damage, say
Trenberth, K.E., Dai, A., Van Der Schrier, G., Jones, P.D., Barichivich, J., Briffa, K.R. and
Sheffield, J., 2014. Global warming and changes in drought. Nature Climate Change, 4(1),
pp.17-22.
Warburton, D., 2013. Community and sustainable development: participation in the future.
Routledge.
www.sepa.org.uk. 2017. Scottish Environment Protection Agency. [online] Available at:
https://www.sepa.org.uk/environment/waste/waste-data/waste-data-strategy/ [Accessed 24
May 2017].