Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ao
03
FOR AERONAUTICS
. .. . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . .. ..— .. d
IN NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR AERONAUTICS
icislzii‘
0ffb5Sbq
TECHNICALNOTE2563. ,
sumARY
INTRODUCTION
i.
\,
, .-. - .... . -- .- -— --—-- _- —____ ,._. — —.— -.—. ———-— --- —— —-— --—-—--—---
\
2 MCA TN 2563.
This investigation was conducted under the sponsorship and with the .
financial assistance of the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics.
The authors wish to acknowledge their indebtedness to Mr. Gary Gould for
valuable assistance in the experimental tivestigation and Mr. Conrad
Schmidt for machining of the test spectiens.
smBoI.s
E modulus of elasticity
E secant modulus
u normal stress
T shear stress
E normal strain a E
(t)
Y shear strain
5 strain deviation (C - C*
)
4 cubical dilatation ●
*
w variation of Poisson’s ratio from elastic value v -v )
( \
XYY)Z Cartesian coordinates
Superscripts:
* elastic co~nent
plastic component
Where two subscripts are used, the first refers to the direction
in which the load is applied and the second to the reference direction.
THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS
T = o.~u (1)
(3)
7oct = 0 81 3 (5)
In simple tension
7oct = ‘M (7)
~ s@le shear
7oct = 7 ~/3
2 (8)
(9)
Thus, from equations (4) and (9), it is evident that the strain
affinity terms are actually functions of Poisson’s ratio. The lmliting
values which the affinity terms can assume for a plastically incompressi-
ble solid are given in the following table for typical values of Poissonts
ratio:
Maximumshear (l+V) ●
$ = ~x + ~y+ ~z +
——. - --
N/WATN 2561 5
(
fl=ex*+6y*+6z*
)(+5x +5Y+5Z
) (12)
d =$*+T (13)
where
(15) ‘
and for the plastic component it is assumed that for the orthotropic
solid equation (15) can be written as
(17)
,
.- .- .. - . ...- --- _ _ -—.. -—- .- - --- .—.- -. —.- -—. . . -—— —. -. _.. — .——-——.. —
I
6 NACATN 2561
(20)
or
.
v = 0.5 -EQ5 -V*) (20a)
$
When unloading follows loading into the plastic range, equations (20)
and (20a) yield the elastic value of Poisson’s ratio since the term
~*~ then becomes equal to unity.
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION
Test Procedure
ltqerimental Results
.
CORREIATIOI? OF THEORYAItD TEST DATA
%
A significant feature of the experimental study is contained in
figures 13, 14, and 15 which show that the plastic dilatation is not
zero for the aluiinum alloys under hsvestigation. This experimental
fact maybe attributed, in part, to the anisotropic clmracter of these
engineering mterials. ,
Material Loading
[
I 14S-T6
I Tension in z-direction
kiln v =V
G*/G-+o (a)
..
If the asymptotic strain ratio is’s co~tant, then the plastic dilatation
should be a linear function of~the strain deviation.
(l’i’a)
(24)
-— ---
NACAm 2561. IL
DISCUSSION
The Poisson~s ratio test data presented herein ‘forthe yield region
of the stress-strain curve exhibit the same general characteristics as
the test data given in reference 2 for similar aluminm alloys. The
tests reprted in reference 2, howeier, also go far beyond the @eld
region and indicate that in many cases the variation of Poisson’s ratio
reaches a maximum at a strain of between 2 and’6 percent and then
steadily decreases.
,=M 6.
(3)
CONCLUDING REMARKS
— -. .,
.
13
APPENDIX
.
R resistance of strain-sensitivewire
P resisitivity
L length of strain-sensitivewire
.
A area of strain-sensitivewire
r strain reading
R. = POL A. (Al)
4
Under deformation, the resistance is changed by the,increment A(pL~A)
which involves changes,in p, . L, and A. It is known, however, that
this increment is a function of the deformation of the wire only. Thus
. . .. .. . ----- .-. -....-. .— ..-. .. ~.- .. . .- —-. —-- — — -----——- -. --- -—---— ----- --- --—--- -- - -—
14 NACATN 2561
.
where is the strain along the axis of the gage and 62 is the
‘1
transverse strain. For loadings in which c . -VG2, equation (A2)
1
can be rewritten in the form
(A3)
where
The left-hand term of equation (A3) is the reading obtained from the
strain indicator. Equation (A3) can be written approximately as
(A4)
For the AX-5 strain gage used in the test described in the section
entitled “Experimental Investigation,” n = 10 and W/z = 0.5. ‘~US
.
—.— .—--. —-—————— —. —-. -. —.-. .. —. ——— — -.-—- ----— --—-- --- . . —,
NACAm 2561 15
Fm?ERENcEs
.
Section A-A
l-%.-l
Compression sp8cimen
— .— —.
——— ——————
3N
,. 17
. .
. .---- . .. ..
---------- - ._
---. +
‘~ -.-— —- ...._
—-—-------- ~— —---...._--—
IWCATN 2561. 19
t
Figure 5.- Stress-strain curves for”2@-T4 aluminum alloy.
-.. .— ..-. -.-. —-- --—- --------- -—-—- --—— -- —--- —--- —-— -——. — ...— — .— ----–-
20 NACATN 2561
.
-—.—. -. .
i
i
I
I
1
I
I
—.
aGin, ax m uy, ia. /in.
Figure 8.- Poisson’s ratio variation for 14S-T6 aluminum alloy loaded
in x- or y-direction.
.— . .-
1
.
I
CJ
P
Figure 12. - Poisson’s ratio variation for 75S-T6 aluminum alloy
loaded h x- or y-direction.
5N NACATN 2561 27
28
.
.
Figure 14.- Plastic dilatation against strain deviation for
24s-T4 d.mlilllml.~Oy.
..— ..-. .—-— —..-. .—_.. .._. —.__— ——. ,.—. .— -._..—. ... . . . . . . . ____________
30 NACAm 2561
.
NACA-1.m@6y-1-29-52- !0(,(,
. _— ...-.— ...—
—— -— —.