Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2R-07
Ronald J. Janowiak
Chair
*
Committee 349 members who were major contributors to the development of this report.
349.2R-1
349.2R-2 ACI COMMITTEE REPORT
ψed,N = factor used to modify tensile strength of The evaluation of loads in each anchor and the effects on
anchors based on proximity to edges of the group strength is well defined in the design examples for
concrete member, see D.5.2.5 single anchors (Examples A1 to A4) and four anchors under
ψed,V = factor used to modify shear strength of anchors tension (Examples B1 and B4).
based on proximity to edges of concrete Examples B2 and B3 have four anchors under applied
member, see D.6.2.6 shears and moments. The embedment depth is selected such
Note: When used in the design examples that follow, kips that the anchor strength under tension loads is controlled by
is used instead of lb (1 kip = 1000 lb). Also, kip-inch or kip-in. ductile yielding of the steel.
is used interchangeably with in.-kip. When designing the base plates in each problem, no
distinction between the AISC load factors (and φ-factors)
COMMENTARY and the ACI load factors (and φ-factors) is made. The Engineer
ACI 349-06 specifies acceptance criteria for tension and should reconcile the differences between these two codes
shear loads on individual anchors and on groups of anchors. when designing the base plate.
It specifies that the loads be determined by elastic analysis. When the Engineer is faced with base plate and anchorage
Plastic analysis is permitted provided that deformational configuration differing from those used in these design
compatibility is taken into account, equilibrium is satisfied examples, the Engineer must apply the Code requirements
on the deformed geometry (taking into account the change in and use rational assumptions appropriate for these other
stiffness due to yielding), deformation does not lead to design configurations.
structural instability, and the nominal strength of the anchor Strength reduction factor φ for frictional resistance is not
is controlled by ductile steel elements. This document does explicitly defined in the Code. As frictional resistance is not
not provide detailed methods of analyses as to how to calculate related to a steel mode of failure, the examples have used the
the loads on anchors, but does specify design rules when the φ-factor from D.4.4c or D.4.5c (depending on whether 9.2 or
internal tension or shear loads are eccentric. C.2 of the Code is used, respectively).
CONCRETE CAPACITY DESIGN (CCD) METHOD—EMBEDMENT DESIGN EXAMPLES 349.2R-5
Design an embedment using a stud welded to an embedded plate. The stud is located sufficiently away from the edges on the
concrete so that there are no edge effects.
Given:
Concrete edges
ca1 = ca2 = 12 in.
ha = 18 in.
Concrete
fc′ = 4000 psi
Plate
3 x 3 x 3/8 in. thick
Fy = 36 ksi
Loads
Nua = 8 kips
Assumptions:
• Concrete is cracked.
• φ-factors are based on Condition B in D.4.5 of the Code
(no supplementary reinforcement).
*
Stud material is A29/A108, material properties per AWS D1.1, 2006, Table 7.1, Type
B stud. Yield strength = 51 ksi; tensile strength = 65 ksi. It has elongation of 20% and
reduction in area of 50%; meets the definition of a ductile steel element given in D.1,
and meets the tensile strength requirements of D.5.1.2 and D.6.1.2: futa ≤ 1.9fya (65 ≤
1.9 × 51 = 96.9 < 125 ksi).