Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Construction
in 34 jurisdictions worldwide
Contributing editor: Robert S Peckar 2010
Published by
Getting The Deal Through
in association with:
Akinci Law Office
Alem & Associates
Arzinger
BCM Hanby Wallace
Beiten Burkhardt
Bin Shabib & Associates (BSA) LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Drakopoulos Law Firm
EEIG LawFed
Fangda Partners
Fladgate LLP
Foyen Advokatfirma AB
FPS Rechtsanwälte & Notare
George Etomi & Partners
HLAW Hofmann & Partners
Iason Skouzos & Partners
Jausas
Kvale & Co Advokatfirma ANS
Lalive
Lalive in Qatar LLP
Larraín Rozas Lackington Rencoret & Urzúa, Abogados
Maddocks
Mäkitalo Rantanen & Co Ltd
M V Kini & Co, Advocates & Solicitors
Navarro Sologuren, Paredes, Gray Abogados
Oh-Ebashi LPC & Partners
Peckar & Abramson PC
Pinheiro Neto Advogados
Rattagan, Macchiavello Arocena & Peña Robirosa Abogados
Sánchez DeVanny Eseverri, SC
Schönherr – Szécsényi Ügyvédi Iroda
Tanasescu Leaua Cadar & Asociatii
Vaughan Avocats
WongPartnership LLP
contents
Construction 2010
Russia Kamil Karibov and Anna Strezhneva Beiten Burkhardt 138
Published by Singapore Christopher Chuah and Tay Peng Cheng WongPartnership LLP 144
Law Business Research Ltd
87 Lancaster Road Spain Mercedes Clavell and Roger Canals Jausas 150
London, W11 1QQ, UK
Tel: +44 20 7908 1188 Sweden Eva Westberg Persson and Andreas Magnusson Foyen Advokatfirma AB 156
Fax: +44 20 7229 6910
© Law Business Research Ltd Switzerland Matthias Scherer, Michael E Schneider and Nathalie Bigler Lalive 161
2009
No photocopying: copyright Turkey Ziya Akinci Akinci Law Office 166
licences do not apply.
Ukraine Timur Bondaryev Arzinger 172
ISSN 1755-6953
United Arab Emirates Antonios Dimitracopoulos, Andrew Gibson and Kristine Kalnina
The information provided in this
publication is general and may not Bin Shabib & Associates (BSA) LLP 178
apply in a specific situation. Legal
advice should always be sought United Kingdom Frances Alderson and Hugh Saunders Fladgate LLP 185
before taking any legal action based
on the information provided. This United States Robert S Peckar and Michael S Zicherman Peckar & Abramson PC 192
information is not intended to create,
nor does receipt of it constitute,
a lawyer–client relationship. The
publishers and authors accept
no responsibility for any acts or
omissions contained herein. Although
the information provided is accurate
as of August 2009, be advised that
this is a developing area.
Law
Business
Research www.gettingthedealthrough.com
qatar Lalive in Qatar LLP
Qatar
Marcus C Boeglin and Michael E Schneider
Lalive in Qatar LLP
the Labour Department restricting work in open-air sites during the on a BOT (build, operate, transfer) basis; otherwise PPP projects are
summer months (namely 15 June to 31 August). During this period, not common. Contracts invariably provide for contractor’s warranty
morning working hours must not exceed five hours in total and may and maintenance obligations for a predetermined period.
not continue after 11:30am. Afternoon working hours must start
after 3pm. Companies working in the petroleum and gas sector are
12 Payment of fees
not subject to this ministerial decision.
How may a contractor secure the right to payment of its costs and
fees from an owner? May the contractor place liens on the property?
7 Close of operations
The safest mechanism, obviously, is the payment schedule under the
If a foreign contractor that has been legally operating decides to close
contract, with adequate advance and progress payments. Liens for
its operations, what are the legal obstacles to closing up and leaving?
contractors and suppliers are provided for under articles 1184 to
As a prerequisite for winding up, a construction joint venture must 1186 of the Qatar Civil Code.
obtain an income tax clearance certificate from the Income Tax Depending on the dispute settlement provisions in the contract,
Department evidencing payment of income tax on the profits of its claims for payment can be made in arbitration or in the state courts.
Qatar operations and clearance from the Ministry of Labour. In addition, the contractor may apply for an attachment order on the
property under construction. The attachment order, if obtained, must
be validated by the contractor within a time period specified by the
8 Standard forms of construction contracts
court by initiating proceedings on the merits against the employer.
What standard-contract forms are used for construction and design?
There is no legal advantage for local contractors in private or govern- Article 57 of the 2005 Public Procurement Regulations provides that
ment tenders, but contractors (domestic or foreign) residing in and the contract is avoided in cases of bankruptcy or insolvency of the con-
operating out of Qatar are better positioned to be awarded business tractor. Similar provisions can often be found in the contract itself.
based on their knowledge, prior experience and recognition in the
local market.
17 Contracting with government entities
Can a government agency assert sovereign immunity as a defence to
11 PPP and PFI a contractor’s claim for payment?
Is there a formal statutory and regulatory framework for PPP and PFI
All contract claims against government entities or agencies can be
contracts?
pursued in court or, if so agreed, in arbitration. In some contracts
Due to the country’s wealth, infrastructure projects are generally the government entity in question has expressly waived its immunity
government-owned and operated. Some projects have been awarded from jurisdiction and from execution. We are not aware of a situ-
www.gettingthedealthrough.com 129
qatar Lalive in Qatar LLP
ation where a government entity or agency has invoked sovereign 22 Dispute resolution mechanisms
immunity in a construction dispute before the state courts in Qatar. What dispute resolution procedures are successfully used to solve
In the French case Creighton v Qatar, the state of Qatar claimed construction disputes?
sovereign immunity from execution against a foreign arbitral award
Construction disputes are usually referred to the local courts, and less
under ICC rules in France; the French Supreme Court (Creighton Ltd
frequently to arbitration.
v Qatar, 6 July 2000, Rev arb 2001, 114) denied such immunity. The
court ruled that the reference to the ICC rules, which provide that
the parties shall comply with all awards, amounts to a waiver of the 23 Courts and tribunals
immunity from execution. In other jurisdictions, an arbitration agree- Are there any specialised tribunals that are dedicated to resolving
ment may be construed as a waiver of immunity from jurisdiction, construction disputes?
but not from execution.
Construction disputes are tried by the courts for civil and commercial
We are not aware of any case in the courts of Qatar concerning
matters and the corresponding chambers in the Court of Appeals
the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award against the state. Qatar
and the Supreme Court. There are no specialised courts or chambers
has not ratified the United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional
specifically for construction disputes, nor is there a court-ordered
Immunities of States and their Property of 2 December 2004.
system of ‘adjudication’ in place in Qatar.
18 Bribery
24 Dispute review boards
If a contractor has illegally obtained the award of a contract, for
Are dispute review boards (DRBs) used? Are their decisions treated as
example by bribery, will the contract be enforceable?
mandatory, advisory, final or interim?
Article 57 of the 2005 Public Procurement Regulations provides that
There is no provision for DRBs in the Procurement Regulations but
the contract is void in cases of fraud and corruption. Bribery will also
the regulations also would not lead to the exclusion of DRBs. The
lead to criminal charges against responsible individuals including share-
practice of such boards under the FIDIC conditions and other model
holders and officers of the company or joint venture in question.
contracts is likely to lead to the use of DRBs in Qatari projects.
19 Arbitration
25 Mediation
What is the prevailing attitude towards arbitration of construction
Has the practice of voluntary participation in professionally organised
disputes? Is it preferred over litigation in the local courts?
mediation gained acceptance and, if so, how prevalent is the practice
Article 10 of the 2005 Public Procurement Regulations provides that and where are the mediators coming from?
the parties to a contract with the government or any public entity
There is no statutory definition of mediation, nor does Qatari law
may agree to arbitration, but require the approval of the minister of
provide for or regulate it. Mediation is not commonly used in Qatar
finance. The provision expressly requires that, pending the arbitra-
but contracts occasionally provide it as a preliminary step before the
tion, the parties must continue performing their obligations under the
dispute is submitted to arbitration or the courts.
contract. The regulations do not apply to Qatar Petroleum, which
regularly provides for arbitration, or to contracts by the military and
the police. 26 Confidentiality in mediation
Are statements made in mediation confidential?
28 Governing law and arbitration provider ates has both facilitated rapid economic growth and diversification
If a foreign contractor wanted to pursue work and insisted by contract and provided significant on-the-job training for Qatari nationals.
upon international arbitration as the dispute resolution mechanism,
which of the customary international arbitration providers is preferred
31 International treaties
and why?
Is your jurisdiction a signatory to any investment agreements for
Given the confidential nature of the contracts, it is difficult to give the protection of investments of a foreign entity in construction and
any reliable answer to this question. It would seem that the most infrastructure projects? If so, how does your model agreement define
popular arbitration rules are those of the International Chamber of ‘investment’?
Commerce (ICC rules). The use of other rules, such as those of the
Swiss Chambers of Commerce (Swiss rules) or the London Court As of 1 June 2007, Qatar has signed 34 bilateral investment agree-
of International Arbitration (LCIA rules) depends on preferences ments (BITs), of which only 12 are in force, with the following states:
and experiences of the parties and the lawyers or engineers assisting Belarus, China, Finland, France, Germany, India, Iran, Italy, South
them in the preparation of the tender documents or the contract Korea, Morocco, Romania and Switzerland.
negotiation. Regional arbitration centres, in particular those in Cairo To our knowledge there is no Qatari model bilateral investment
(CRCICA) and Dubai (DIAC) are probably gaining in recognition. treaty. Consequently, the definitions of investment in the treaties con-
In their respective fields the arbitration centres in the Qatar Finan- cluded by Qatar depend on the models of other states or the result of
cial Centre and the DIFC in Dubai (in cooperation with the LCIA) negotiations in individual cases.
also are competing for the business. Finally, the Qatar International The BITs concluded by Qatar offer investors an option to initiate
Centre of Arbitration is developing its activities and has had some ICSID arbitration or other forms of international arbitration, such
success with local and some foreign users. as ad hoc arbitration (eg, the French–Qatari BIT). As Qatar has not
The preferences concerning the choice of the places of arbitration signed the ICSID Convention, ICSID arbitration is not available for
is equally difficult to ascertain. Doha, Paris, Geneva and London the time being. However, arbitration under the ICSID Additional
are probably the most frequently chosen. Concerning the merits of Facility rules may be possible under some of the BITs.
the dispute, there is a strong preference for the law of Qatar. The ICSID arbitral tribunals frequently deal with claims by investors
choice of foreign law depends to some extent on the industry. In related to construction projects, for example:
construction contracts, English and Swiss law are probably the most • Consortium RFCC v Kingdom of Morocco (ICSID Case No.
frequent choices. ARB/00/6) – construction of the section of a highway;
• Salini Costruttori SpA and Italstrade SpA v Kingdom of Morocco,
(ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4) – construction of the section of a
29 International environmental law highway; and
Is your jurisdiction party to the Stockholm Declaration of 1972? What • Amco Asia Corporation and others v Republic of Indonesia,
are the local laws that provide for preservation of the environment and (ICSID Case No. ARB/81/1) – construction and operation of a
wildlife while advancing infrastructure and building projects? hotel.
Qatar is not a signatory of the Stockholm Declaration. The basic
enactment in the field of environment is Law No. 30 of 2002 for the 32 Tax treaties
Protection of the Environment. Pursuant to this law, the Supreme Has your jurisdiction entered into double taxation treaties pursuant
Council of the Environment and Natural Reserves issued Decision to which a contractor is prevented from being taxed in various
No. 4 of 2005, which provides, in chapter 2, for environmental jurisdictions?
impact assessments for all public and private development projects.
As per 1 July 2008, Qatar only has double taxation treaties with
the following countries: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, France, India,
30 Other international legal considerations Pakistan, Romania, Russia, Senegal, Seychelles, Singapore, Sri Lanka,
Are there any other important legal issues that may present obstacles Tunisia, Turkey and Yemen.
to a foreign contractor attempting to do business in your jurisdiction?
www.gettingthedealthrough.com 131
qatar Lalive in Qatar LLP
No, there are no controls or laws that restrict the removal of profits
and investments from your jurisdiction.