Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Secondary Contact:
Lisa M Schineller, PhD, New York (1) 212-438-7352; lisa.schineller@spglobal.com
Table Of Contents
Overview
Rating Action
Rationale
Outlook
Key Statistics
Related Criteria
Related Research
Ratings List
Rating Action
On March 3, 2017, S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term foreign and local
currency sovereign ratings on Barbados to 'CCC+' from 'B-'. The outlook is
negative. We also lowered the short-term ratings to 'C' from 'B.' At the same
time, we lowered our transfer and convertibility assessment for Barbados to
'CCC+' from 'B-'.
Rationale
The downgrade reflects our view that the government of Barbados' willingness
to take timely, proactive corrective measures to strengthen its financial
profile continues to erode. In our view, a weaker ability to meet its
debt-servicing requirements stems from still-high fiscal deficits, limited
access to private-sector funding in the local market, as well as a decline in
external funding, and with it foreign exchange reserves. The sovereign's debt
servicing capacity depends on favorable financial and economic conditions
consistent with our "Criteria For Assigning 'CCC+', 'CCC', 'CCC-', And 'CC'
Ratings," in our opinion
deficits continued to rise again in 2016. From April to December 2016 (the
first nine months of fiscal 2016-2017) the central bank, and, to a lesser
degree, the National Insurance Scheme (NIS) in effect wholly financed the
government's borrowing needs. Private domestic financial institutions reduced
their exposure to government securities, and the government paid down external
debt. We consider the policy of ongoing dependence on central bank financing
at odds with the government's goal of defending Barbados' long-standing
currency peg with the U.S. dollar. It significantly curtails the central
bank's ability to act as a lender of last resort in the financial system.
The high level of central bank financing underscores the challenges associated
with timely corrective fiscal policy actions. The government plans to present
the 2017-2018 budget in the coming month. While it seemingly aims to rely on
increased recourse to asset sales to fund the deficit, in our view, the
prospects for deeper expenditure or revenue adjustment are uncertain,
underscored by the poor track record of execution. This comes as the country
moves into an electoral cycle, with parliamentary elections due by February
2018. Furthermore, one-off revenues from the sale of the Barbados National
Terminal Company are still pending after initially expected to materialize a
year ago. This demonstrates policy inaction and prospects for slow progress on
asset sales. The streamlining of state-owned enterprise finances is behind
schedule, and their management continues to weigh on Barbados' fiscal profile.
Finally, delays in complying with terms and requirements for official
borrowing (from multilateral agencies, for example) have contributed to delays
in external disbursements, which are important to bolster international
reserves. In sum, the various failures to respond in a timely fashion to
mitigate fiscal and financial pressures further weigh on our view of Barbados'
institutional and policy effectiveness.
With about US$15,800 per capita GDP projected for 2017, Barbados is still one
of the richest countries in the Caribbean. However, growth has been below that
of peers with a similar level of economic development, and the economy depends
highly on tourism. While three major hotels had announced new investments on
the island--the Hyatt, the Sam Lord's Castle project by Wyndham, and the
expansion of the all-inclusive Sandals hotel--only Sandals is not suffering
from delays. Given these recurrent delays, and our expectations for ongoing
risks associated with sluggish fiscal correction, we have lowered our growth
forecast and level for per capita GDP, which weakens Barbados' overall
economic profile.
The high current account deficit (CAD), which is not fully financed by foreign
Outlook
The negative outlook reflects the potential for a downgrade over the next 12
months should the government fail to make additional progress in lowering its
high fiscal deficit or if external pressures worsen with persistent and large
CADs. This scenario would likely lead to further deterioration in the
availability of deficit financing and pose challenges for the fixed exchange
rate.
We could revise the outlook to stable within the next 12 months if the
government succeeds in stemming further slippage in its fiscal accounts--be it
from implementation of fiscal measures or a stronger-than-expected rebound in
growth; improves its access to financing, especially from private creditors
locally and globally; and stabilizes the country's external vulnerabilities
and bolsters international reserves.
Key Statistics
Table 1
Barbados--Selected Indicators
(Mil. $) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017F 2018F 2019F 2020F
Table 1
Barbados--Selected Indicators (cont.)
Nominal GDP (bil. $) 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.7
GDP per capita (000s $) 15.7 15.6 15.7 15.6 15.5 15.6 15.8 16.0 16.3 16.5
Real GDP growth 0.8 0.3 (0.0) 0.0 0.9 1.5 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.5
Real GDP per capita growth 0.8 (0.1) (0.0) (0.3) 0.5 1.2 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.2
Real investment growth 7.4 (7.1) (5.5) (0.5) 26.2 (21.7) 1.8 1.5 1.8 1.5
Investment/GDP 15.1 14.1 13.2 13.2 16.7 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8
Savings/GDP 1.2 4.7 3.8 2.9 10.6 8.1 7.4 7.9 8.7 9.5
Exports/GDP 39.0 39.3 36.4 36.8 37.2 40.8 40.8 40.8 40.8 40.8
Real exports growth (15.0) 1.1 (7.4) 1.2 1.8 11.5 0.8 0.5 0.8 0.5
Unemployment rate 11.2 11.5 11.6 12.3 11.3 10.0 11.0 11.0 10.5 10.6
Table 1
Barbados--Selected Indicators (cont.)
Banks' claims on resident non-gov't 66.3 71.0 68.5 68.5 68.1 68.8 67.8 67.8 67.8 67.8
sector/GDP
Foreign currency share of residents' 7.1 4.1 3.8 4.8 6.4 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.6 6.6
bank deposits
Real effective exchange rate growth 3.9 1.6 (0.6) (1.2) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Savings is defined as investment plus the current account surplus (deficit). Investment is defined as expenditure on capital goods, including plant,
equipment, and housing, plus the change in inventories. Banks are other depository corporations other than the central bank, whose liabilities are
included in the national definition of broad money. Gross external financing needs are defined as current account payments plus short-term
external debt at the end of the prior year plus nonresident deposits at the end of the prior year plus long-term external debt maturing within the
year. Narrow net external debt is defined as the stock of foreign and local currency public- and private-sector borrowings from nonresidents
minus official reserves minus public-sector liquid assets held by nonresidents minus financial-sector loans to, deposits with, or investments in
nonresident entities. A negative number indicates net external lending. F--Forecast. LC--Local currency. CARs--Current account receipts.
FDI--Foreign direct investment. CAPs--Current account payments. The data and ratios above result from S&P Global Ratings' own calculations,
drawing on national as well as international sources, reflecting S&P Global Ratings' independent view on the timeliness, coverage, accuracy,
credibility, and usability of available information.
S&P Global Ratings' analysis of sovereign creditworthiness rests on its assessment and scoring of five key rating factors: (i) institutional
assessment; (ii) economic assessment; (iii) external assessment; (iv) the average of fiscal flexibility and performance, and debt burden; and (v)
monetary assessment. Each of the factors is assessed on a continuum spanning from 1 (strongest) to 6 (weakest). Section V.B of S&P Global
Ratings' "Sovereign Rating Methodology," published on Dec. 23, 2014 , summarizes how the various factors are combined to derive the sovereign
foreign currency rating, while section V.C details how the scores are derived. The ratings score snapshot summarizes whether we consider that
the individual rating factors listed in our methodology constitute a strength or a weakness to the sovereign credit profile, or whether we consider
them to be neutral. The concepts of "strength," "neutral," or "weakness" are absolute, rather than in relation to sovereigns in a given rating
category. Therefore, highly rated sovereigns will typically display more strengths, and lower rated sovereigns more weaknesses. In accordance
with S&P Global Ratings' sovereign ratings methodology, a change in assessment of the aforementioned factors does not in all cases lead to a
change in the rating, nor is a change in the rating necessarily predicated on changes in one or more of the assessments.
Related Criteria
• Criteria - Governments - Sovereigns: Sovereign Rating Methodology, Dec.
23, 2014
• General Criteria: Methodology For Linking Short-Term And Long-Term
Ratings For Corporate, Insurance, And Sovereign Issuers, May 07, 2013
• General Criteria: Criteria For Assigning 'CCC+', 'CCC', 'CCC-', And 'CC'
Ratings, Oct. 01, 2012
• General Criteria: Use Of CreditWatch And Outlooks, Sept. 14, 2009
• General Criteria: Methodology: Criteria For Determining Transfer And
Convertibility Assessments, May 18, 2009
Related Research
Barbados, Sept. 30, 2016
In accordance with our relevant policies and procedures, the Rating Committee
was composed of analysts that are qualified to vote in the committee, with
sufficient experience to convey the appropriate level of knowledge and
understanding of the methodology applicable (see 'Related Criteria And
Research'). At the onset of the committee, the chair confirmed that the
information provided to the Rating Committee by the primary analyst had been
distributed in a timely manner and was sufficient for Committee members to
make an informed decision.
After the primary analyst gave opening remarks and explained the
recommendation, the Committee discussed key rating factors and critical issues
in accordance with the relevant criteria. Qualitative and quantitative risk
factors were considered and discussed, looking at track-record and forecasts.
The committee agreed that the "institutional and governance effectiveness" and
"economic" assessments had deteriorated. All other key rating factors were
unchanged.
The chair ensured every voting member was given the opportunity to articulate
his/her opinion. The chair or designee reviewed the draft report to ensure
consistency with the Committee decision. The views and the decision of the
rating committee are summarized in the above rationale and outlook. The
weighting of all rating factors is described in the methodology used in this
rating action (see 'Related Criteria And Research').
Ratings List
Downgraded
To From
Barbados
Sovereign Credit Rating CCC+/Negative/C B-/Negative/B
Transfer & Convertibility Assessment CCC+ B-
Senior Unsecured
Long term CCC+ B-
Short term C B
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be
modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of
Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party
providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or
availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use
of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS
OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM
FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY
SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive,
special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by
negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact.
S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any
investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The
Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making
investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from
sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P
reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the
assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result,
certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the
confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate
its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com
and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional
information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
STANDARD & POOR’S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC.