Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1) If x a , then x a a x a .
2) If M and F K then MF M F K
3) Triangle Inequality: | A B | | A | | B |
4) | A | | B | | A B | | A | | B |
5) If A x B then
1 1 1
6) If 0 A x B or A x B 0 , then k
max k
, k for k 1, 2,3,....
|x | |A | |B |
Solution:
Using property 1): Since x 3 1 , then 2 x 4 .
Using property 5a) | x 5 | max 2 5 , | 4 5 | max 3,1 3
Conclude | x 5 | 3
Solution:
Since x 3 5 , then 2 x 8 . Using property 1)
| x 2 5 x 7 | | x 2 5 x 7 | | x 2 | | 5 x | | 7 | Using property 3)
| x2 | 5 | x | | 7 |
max | 2 |,| 82 | 5max
2
2 , 8 | 7 | Using Property 5)
64 40 7 111
Conclude | x 2 5 x 7 | 111
Given a function f defined for all x in some open interval containing the number a ,
with the possible exception that f may or may not be defined at a . We write
lim f ( x ) L
xa
There are two parts of the proof associated with using this definition. One must
first discover the number associated with a given value of . In general, will
be a function of . Secondly, the proof must be written as a formal presentation.
The discovery of the number associated with a given value of is usually broken
into two parts. In the first part a rough estimate is obtained, denoted by N. This
rough estimate is often “good enough” if epsilon is large. In the second part, this
rough estimate is refined; this estimate is needed if epsilon is small. The
1 1
refinement is usually a multiple of epsilon . Since N and , the
K K
standard choice for delta is min N ,
K
Solution:
Since 0 x 3 1 , 2 x 4 . Thus x 2 3 x 4 x 2 3 x 4 16 12 4 32
Solution:
Proof:
Given 0 , let min 1,
32
assume 0 x 3 .
Consider f ( x) L x3 5 x 3 15 x3 5 x 12
= x 3 x 2 3 x 4
Since 0 x 3 1 , 2 x 4 . Thus x 2 3 x 4 x 2 3 x 4 16 12 4 32
Therefore, f ( x) L x 3 x 2 3 x 4 32 32
32
QED
Usually the synthetic division will be shown somewhere on the paper as a side note.
Homework
1.) lim B# œ *
BÄ$
#ÞÑlim B# B # œ !
BÄ"
3.)lim B$ œ )
BÄ#