PROJECT :

CLIENT :
JOB NO. : DATE :
Drilled Cast-in-place Pile Design Based on ACI 318-14

DESIGN CRITERIA
1. ASSUME FIX HEAD CONDITION IF Ldh & Lhk COMPLY WITH THE TENSION DEVELOPMENT. OTHERWISE PINNE

2. FROM PILE CAP BALANCED LOADS & REACTIONS, DETERMINE MAX SECTION FORCES OF SINGLE PILE, P u

INPUT DATA & DESIGN SUMMARY

CONCRETE STRENGTH fc' = 4.5 ksi
VERT. REBAR YIELD STRESS fy = 60 ksi
PILE DIAMETER D = 24 in
PILE LENGTH L = 35 ft
FACTORED AXIAL LOAD Pu = 100 k
FACTORED MOMENT LOAD Mu = 200 ft-k
FACTORED SHEAR LOAD Vu = 20 k
PILE VERT. REINF. 8 # 7
SEISMIC DESIGN (ACI 18.13.4) ? Yes
LATERAL REINF. OPTION (0=Spirals, 1=Ties) 1 Ties
LATERAL REINFORCEMENT # 4 @ 6 in o.c.
(spacing 3.0 in o.c. at top end of 10.0 ft.)
(2015 IBC 1810.3.9 & ACI 18.13.4)

( Ldh = 9 in & Lhk = 14 in )

THE DESIGN IS INADEQUATE.

ANALYSIS
CHECK PILE LIMITATIONS
fc ' = 4.5 ksi > 4 ksi [Satisfactory] (2015 IBC Table 1808.
D= 24 in > MAX( L / 30 , 12 in) [Satisfactory] (2015 IBC 1810.3.5.2)

CHECK FLEXURAL & AXIAL CAPACITY


 
2 0.85 f '
C 
o = , E c = 57
Ec

    

0.85 f
'
C
2  c    c
f C =    o    o
 '

0.85 f , for  c 
 C


 s E s , for  s  
f =
S
 f , for  s   y
 y

f Pmax =F f [ 0.85 fc' (Ag - Ast) + fy Ast] = 1040 kips., (at max axial load, ACI 318-14 22.4.2)
where F = 0.8 , ACI 318-14 22.4.2
f = 0.65 (ACI 318-14 21.2) >
Ag = 452 in2. Ast = 4.80 in2.

1200

1000

800
AT COMPRESSION ONLY
600
AT MAXIMUM LOAD
400 AT 0 % TENSION
f Pn (k) AT 25 % TENSION
200 AT 50 % TENSION
AT  t = 0.002
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 AT BALANCED CONDITION
-200 AT  t = 0.005
AT FLEXURE ONLY
-400
AT TENSION ONLY

f Mn (ft-k)

a = Cbb1 = 10 in (at balanced strain condition, ACI 21.2.2)

0.75 + ( t - 0.002 ) (50), for Spiral
f= = 0.656 (ACI 318-14 21.2)
0.65 + ( t - 0.002 ) (250 / 3), for Ties

where Cb = d c / (c + s) = 12 in t = 0.002069 c =

d = 20.06 in, (ACI 20.6) b1 = 0.825 ( ACI 318-14 22.2.2.4.3)
 f Mn = 0.9 Mn = 186 ft-kips @ Pn = 0, (ACI 318-14 21.2) ,& t,max = 0.004, (ACI 318-14 21.2.3)
f Mn = 250 ft-kips @ Pu = 100 kips > Mu
rmax = 0.08 (ACI 318-14 10.6) rprovd = 0.011
rmin = 0.005 (2015 IBC 1810.3.9.4.2)

CHECK SHEAR CAPACITY

f Vn = f (Vs + Vc) = 92 kips, (ACI 318-14 22.5)
> Vu [Satisfactory]
where f = 0.75 (ACI 318-14 21.2)
A0 = 316 in2. Av = 0.40 in2. fy = 60
Vc = 2 (fc')0.5A0 = 42.4 kips, (ACI 318-14 22.5)
Vs = MIN (d fy Av / s , 8 (fc')0.5A0) = 80.3 kips, (ACI 318-14 22.5.1)
smax = 10.5 (2015 IBC 1810.3.9.4.2) sprovd = 6
smin = 1
rs = 0.12 fc' / fyt = 0.009 > rs,provd = 0.008 [Unsatisfactory] (ACI 318-14 18.13.4.3 & 18.7.5.1)

 r 
requird 0.02y ed b f
L
DETERMINE = MAX h CONDITION
dh FIX HEAD
y
, 8d b , 6 in  =
 r provided l f ' 
 c 

10 db = 9 in
(ACI 318-14 25.4.3)

Lhk = 14 in, (ACI 318-14 25.4)

where db = 0.875 in
r required / r provided = 0.8 ( A s,reqd / A s,provd , ACI 318 25.4.10.1)
ye = 1.0 (1.2 for epoxy-coated, ACI 318-14 25.4.2.4)
l = 1.0 (normal weight)
h = 0.7 (#11 or smaller, cover > 2.5" & side >2.0",
ACI 318-14 25.4.3.2)

LICENSE NUMBER: B????? - New Packa

www.Engineering-International.com
140
 PAGE :
DESIGN BY :
REVIEW BY :

NT. OTHERWISE PINNED AT TOP.

ES OF SINGLE PILE, P u, Mu, & Vu.

1. PILE TOP SHEAR, Vu, & MOMENT, Mu, RELATIONSHIP

< == Tips: MUST BE FROM SOIL REPORT (RV vs RM) DIAGRAM.

THEY ARE NON-LINEAR SET AND EQUAL AT ALL TOP

OF PILES FOR RIGID PILE CAP. USING LINEAR
SPRINGS TO MODEL THEM IS INADEQUATE.
2. PILE CAPS SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED BY TIES
WITH Min(0.25, SDS/10) TIMES AXIAL VERT
COLUMN LOADING. (2015 IBC 1810.3.13). TO CONSIDE
CONCRETE TENSION CREAKED, THE TIE BEAM
SHOULD NOT BE LATERAL REACTION MEMBER.

3. See PrestressedConcreteCircularHollowSection.xls at
for Prestressed Concrete Circular Hollow Pole/Pile Design

(2015 IBC Table 1808.8.1) 4. How does the software relate the pier or pile to the soils?
(2015 IBC 1810.3.5.2) 1). For soil capacities, check Soil Report from Geotechnical E
Soils Engineer), including soil capacities for pile axial and
2). For concrete pile section forces (this software inputs), use
  0.85 f  '
C
, E c = 57 f
'
, E s = 29000ksi
pile axial capacity from Soil Report as axial section force.

Ec
C at top end, the lateral section moment and shear force sho
on the cantilever beam calculation. If pile pinned at top, m
      2
0.85 f '
C
2  c    c   , for 0   c   o should be based on simply supported beam with maximum
   o    o  
'
0.85 f C , for  c   o
 sE s , for  s   y
f y , for  s   y

I 318-14 22.4.2)

Pu [Satisfactory]

(cont'd)

f Pn (kips) f Mn (ft-kips)
PRESSION ONLY 1040 0
MUM LOAD 1040 143
860 232
710 275
586 292
404 293
NCED CONDITION 397 295
179 300
0 186
-259 0

0.003
8-14 22.2.2.4.3)
318-14 21.2.3)

[Satisfactory]

[Satisfactory]

ksi

in
[Satisfactory]
-14 18.13.4.3 & 18.7.5.1)

????? - New Package License

rnational.com
NT, Mu, RELATIONSHIP
(RV vs RM) DIAGRAM.

ND EQUAL AT ALL TOP

USING LINEAR
INADEQUATE.
ONNECTED BY TIES

1810.3.13). TO CONSIDER
D, THE TIE BEAM
ACTION MEMBER.

larHollowSection.xls at Bridge Group

Hollow Pole/Pile Design

pier or pile to the soils?

port from Geotechnical Engineer (Soil or
pacities for pile axial and lateral directions.
his software inputs), use maximum
rt as axial section force. If the pile fixed
ment and shear force should be based
n. If pile pinned at top, moment and shear
rted beam with maximum lateral soil stress.