Flat-Roof Snow Load: where pg = 40 lb/ft2 (1.92 kN/m2). The elevation
difference between the roofs is 10 ft (3 m). The pf = 0.7CeCtIpg 100 ft × 100 ft (30.5 m × 30.5 m) unventilated high where portion is heated and the 170 ft wide (51.8 m), 100 ft (30.5 m) long low portion is an unheated storage area. pg = 25 lb/ft2 (1.20 kN/m2) (from Fig. 7-1) The building is in an industrial park in flat open Ce = 0.9 (from Table 7-2 for Terrain Category B and country with no trees or other structures offering a fully exposed roof) shelter. Ct = 1.0 (from Table 7-3) High Roof: I = 1.1 (from Table 1.5-2) pf = 0.7CeCtIpg Thus: where pf = (0.7)(0.9)(1.0)(1.1)(25) = 17 lb/ft2 In SI: pf = (0.7)(0.9)(1.0)(1.1)(1.19) = 0.83 kN/m2 pg = 40 lb/ft2 (1.92 kN/m2) (given) Ce = 0.9 (from Table 7-2) Tangent of vertical angle from eaves to crown = 5/40 Ct = 1.0 (from Table 7-3) = 0.375 I = 1.0 (from Table 1.5-2) Angle = 21°. Because the vertical angle exceeds 10°, the Thus: minimum roof snow load, pm, does not apply. See pf = 0.7(0.9)(1.0)(1.0)(40) = 25 lb/ft2 Section 7.3.4. (in SI: pf = 0.7(0.9)(1.0)(1.0)(1.92) = 1.21 kN/m2) Sloped-Roof Snow Load: Because pg = 40 lb/ft2 (1.92 kN/m2) and Is = 1.0, the ps = Cspf minimum roof snow load value of pm = 20(1.0) = From Fig. 7-2a, Cs = 1.0 until slope exceeds 30°, 20 lb/ft2 (0.96 kN/m2) and hence does not control which (by geometry) is 30 ft (9.1 m) from the (see Section 7.3.4). centerline. In this area ps = 17(1) = 17 lb/ft2 (in SI ps Low Roof: = 0.83(1) = 0.83 kN/m2). At the eaves, where the pf = 0.7CeCtIpg slope is (by geometry) 41°, Cs = 0.72 and ps = 17(0.72) = 12 lb/ft2 (in SI ps = 0.83(0.72) = 0.60 kN/ where m2). Because slope at eaves is 41°, Case II loading pg = 40 lb/ft2 (1.92 kN/m2) (given) applies. Ce = 1.0 (from Table 7-2) partially exposed due to Unbalanced Snow Load: Because the vertical presence of high roof angle from the eaves to the crown is greater than 10° Ct = 1.2 (from Table 7-3) and less than 60°, unbalanced snow loads must be I = 0.8 (from Table 1.5-2) considered. Thus: Unbalanced load at crown = 0.5 pf = 0.5(17) = 9 lb/ft2 pf = 0.7(1.0)(1.2)(0.8)(40) = 27 lb/ft2 (in SI: = 0.5(0.83) = 0.41 kN/m2) In SI: pf = 0.7(1.0)(1.2)(0.8)(1.92) = 1.29 kN/m2 Unbalanced load at 30° point Because pg = 40 lb/ft2 (1.92 kN/m2) and Is = 0.8, = 2 pfCs/Ce = 2(17)(1.0)/0.9 = 38 lb/ft2 the minimum roof snow load value of pm = 20(0.8) = (in SI: = 2(0.83)(1.0)/0.9 = 1.84 kN/m2) 16 lb/ft2 (0.77 kN/m2) and hence does not control (see Unbalanced load at eaves Section 7.3.4). = 2(17)(0.72)/0.9 = 27 lb/ft2 Drift Load Calculation: (in SI: = 2(0.83)(0.72)/0.9 = 1.33 kN/m2) γ = 0.13(40) + 14 = 19 lb/ft3 Rain on Snow Surcharge: A rain-on-snow (in SI: γ = 0.426(1.92) + 2.2 = 3.02 kN/m3 surcharge load need not be considered, since pg > hb = pf /19 = 27/19 = 1.4 ft 20 psf (0.96 kN/m2) (see Section 7.10). See Fig. C7-6 (in SI: hb = 1.29/3.02 = 0.43 m) for both loading conditions. Example 3: Determine design snow loads for hc = 10 – 1.4 = 8.6 ft the upper and lower flat roofs of a building located (in SI: hc = 3.05 – 0.43 = 2.62 m)
436
Com_c07.indd 436 4/14/2010 11:05:50 AM
MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS
hc/hb = 8.6/1.4 = 6.1 Conference on Snow Engineering. Santa Barbara,
(in SI: hc/hb = 2.62/0.43 = 6.1) Calif., 473–482. Ellingwood, B., and Redfield, R. (1983). “Ground Because hc/hb ≥ 0.2 drift loads must be consid- snow loads for structural design.” J. Struct. Engrg. ered (see Section 7.7.1). (ASCE), 109(4), 950–964. hd (leeward step) = 3.8 ft (1.16 m) Elliott, M. (1975). “Snow load criteria for (Fig. 7-9 with pg = 40 lb/ft2 (1.92 kN/m2) western United States, case histories and state-of-the- and lu = 100 ft [30.5 m]) art.” In Proceedings of the First Western States Conference of Structural Engineer Associations. Sun hd (windward step) = 3/4 × 4.8 ft (1.5 m) River, Ore. = 3.6 ft (1.1 m) (4.8 ft [1.5 m] Finney, E. (1939). “Snow drift control by from Fig. 7-9 with pg = 40 lb/ft2 [1.92 kN/m2] highway design.” Bulletin 86, Michigan State College and lu = length of lower roof = 170 ft [52 m]) Engineering Station, Lansing, Mich. Leeward drift governs, use hd = 3.8 ft (1.16 m) Grange, H. L., and Hendricks, L. T. (1976). Roof- Because hd < hc, snow behavior and ice-dam prevention in residential housing, University of Minnesota, Agricultural hd = 3.8 ft (1.16 m) Extension Service, St. Paul, Minn., Extension Bulletin w = 4hd = 15.2 ft (4.64 m), say 15 ft (4.6 m) 399. pd = hdγ = 3.8(19) = 72 lb/ft2 Irwin, P., William, C., Gamle, S., and Retziaff, R. (in SI: pd = 1.16(3.02) = 3.50 kN/m2) (1992). “Snow prediction in Toronto and the Andes Rain on Snow Surcharge: A rain-on-snow Mountains; FAE simulation capabilities.” In surcharge load need not be considered because pg is Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on greater than 20 lb/ft2 (0.96 kN/m2). See Fig. C7-7 for Snow Engineering, Santa Barbara, Calif. snow loads on both roofs. Isyumov, N., and Mikitiuk, M. (1992). “Wind tunnel modeling of snow accumulation on large roofs.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International REFERENCES Conference on Snow Engineering, Santa Barbara, Calif. Air Structures Institute. (1977). “Design and Kennedy, D., Isyumov, M., and Mikitiuk, M. standards manual.” Air Structures Institute, St. Paul, (1992). “The effectiveness of code provisions for Minn., ASI-77 (available from the Industrial Fabrics snow accumulations on stepped roofs.” In Assn. International, , 1977). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on American Society of Civil Engineers. (1994). Air Snow Engineering, Santa Barbara, Calif. supported structures, American Society of Civil Klinge, A. F. (1978). “Ice dams.” Popular Engineers, New York. Science, 119–120. Brown, J. (1970). “An approach to snow load Lorenzen, R. T. (1970). “Observations of snow evaluation.” In Proceedings of the 38th Western Snow and wind loads precipitant to building failures in New Conference. York State, 1969–1970.” American Society of Colbeck, S. C. (1977a). “Roof loads resulting Agricultural Engineers North Atlantic Region from rain-on-snow: Results of a physical model.” meeting, Paper NA 70-305, Newark, Del. [available Can. J. Civil Engrg., 4, 482–490. from American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Colbeck, S. C. (1977b). “Snow loads resulting Joseph, MO]. from rain-on-snow.” U.S. Dept. of the Army, Cold Lutes, D. A., and Schriever, W. R. (1971). “Snow Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, accumulation in Canada: Case histories: II. Ottawa, Hanover, N.H., CRREL Report 77-12. Ontario, Canada.” National Research Council of Corotis, R. B., Dowding, C. H., and Rossow, E. Canada, DBR Technical Paper 339, NRCC 11915. C. (1979). “Snow and ice accumulation at solar Mackinlay, I. (1988). “Architectural design in collector installations in the Chicago metropolitan regions of snow and ice.” In Proceedings of the First area.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of International Conference on Snow Engineering. Santa Standards, Washington, D.C., NBS-GCR-79 181. Barbara, Calif., 441–455. de Marne, H. (1988). “Field experience in control MacKinlay, I., and Willis, W. E. (1965). Snow and prevention of leaking from ice dams in New country design, National Endowment for the Arts, England.” In Proceedings of the First International Washington, D.C.