You are on page 1of 2

CHAPTER C7 SNOW LOADS

Flat-Roof Snow Load: where pg = 40 lb/ft2 (1.92 kN/m2). The elevation


difference between the roofs is 10 ft (3 m). The
pf = 0.7CeCtIpg 100 ft × 100 ft (30.5 m × 30.5 m) unventilated high
where portion is heated and the 170 ft wide (51.8 m), 100 ft
(30.5 m) long low portion is an unheated storage area.
pg = 25 lb/ft2 (1.20 kN/m2) (from Fig. 7-1) The building is in an industrial park in flat open
Ce = 0.9 (from Table 7-2 for Terrain Category B and country with no trees or other structures offering
a fully exposed roof) shelter.
Ct = 1.0 (from Table 7-3) High Roof:
I = 1.1 (from Table 1.5-2)
pf = 0.7CeCtIpg
Thus:
where
pf = (0.7)(0.9)(1.0)(1.1)(25) = 17 lb/ft2
In SI: pf = (0.7)(0.9)(1.0)(1.1)(1.19) = 0.83 kN/m2 pg = 40 lb/ft2 (1.92 kN/m2) (given)
Ce = 0.9 (from Table 7-2)
Tangent of vertical angle from eaves to crown = 5/40 Ct = 1.0 (from Table 7-3)
= 0.375 I = 1.0 (from Table 1.5-2)
Angle = 21°.
Because the vertical angle exceeds 10°, the Thus:
minimum roof snow load, pm, does not apply. See pf = 0.7(0.9)(1.0)(1.0)(40) = 25 lb/ft2
Section 7.3.4. (in SI: pf = 0.7(0.9)(1.0)(1.0)(1.92) = 1.21 kN/m2)
Sloped-Roof Snow Load:
Because pg = 40 lb/ft2 (1.92 kN/m2) and Is = 1.0, the
ps = Cspf minimum roof snow load value of pm = 20(1.0) =
From Fig. 7-2a, Cs = 1.0 until slope exceeds 30°, 20 lb/ft2 (0.96 kN/m2) and hence does not control
which (by geometry) is 30 ft (9.1 m) from the (see Section 7.3.4).
centerline. In this area ps = 17(1) = 17 lb/ft2 (in SI ps Low Roof:
= 0.83(1) = 0.83 kN/m2). At the eaves, where the pf = 0.7CeCtIpg
slope is (by geometry) 41°, Cs = 0.72 and ps =
17(0.72) = 12 lb/ft2 (in SI ps = 0.83(0.72) = 0.60 kN/ where
m2). Because slope at eaves is 41°, Case II loading
pg = 40 lb/ft2 (1.92 kN/m2) (given)
applies.
Ce = 1.0 (from Table 7-2) partially exposed due to
Unbalanced Snow Load: Because the vertical
presence of high roof
angle from the eaves to the crown is greater than 10°
Ct = 1.2 (from Table 7-3)
and less than 60°, unbalanced snow loads must be
I = 0.8 (from Table 1.5-2)
considered.
Thus:
Unbalanced load at crown
= 0.5 pf = 0.5(17) = 9 lb/ft2 pf = 0.7(1.0)(1.2)(0.8)(40) = 27 lb/ft2
(in SI: = 0.5(0.83) = 0.41 kN/m2) In SI: pf = 0.7(1.0)(1.2)(0.8)(1.92) = 1.29 kN/m2
Unbalanced load at 30° point Because pg = 40 lb/ft2 (1.92 kN/m2) and Is = 0.8,
= 2 pfCs/Ce = 2(17)(1.0)/0.9 = 38 lb/ft2 the minimum roof snow load value of pm = 20(0.8) =
(in SI: = 2(0.83)(1.0)/0.9 = 1.84 kN/m2) 16 lb/ft2 (0.77 kN/m2) and hence does not control (see
Unbalanced load at eaves Section 7.3.4).
= 2(17)(0.72)/0.9 = 27 lb/ft2 Drift Load Calculation:
(in SI: = 2(0.83)(0.72)/0.9 = 1.33 kN/m2) γ = 0.13(40) + 14 = 19 lb/ft3
Rain on Snow Surcharge: A rain-on-snow (in SI: γ = 0.426(1.92) + 2.2 = 3.02 kN/m3
surcharge load need not be considered, since pg > hb = pf /19 = 27/19 = 1.4 ft
20 psf (0.96 kN/m2) (see Section 7.10). See Fig. C7-6 (in SI: hb = 1.29/3.02 = 0.43 m)
for both loading conditions.
Example 3: Determine design snow loads for hc = 10 – 1.4 = 8.6 ft
the upper and lower flat roofs of a building located (in SI: hc = 3.05 – 0.43 = 2.62 m)

436

Com_c07.indd 436 4/14/2010 11:05:50 AM


MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS

hc/hb = 8.6/1.4 = 6.1 Conference on Snow Engineering. Santa Barbara,


(in SI: hc/hb = 2.62/0.43 = 6.1) Calif., 473–482.
Ellingwood, B., and Redfield, R. (1983). “Ground
Because hc/hb ≥ 0.2 drift loads must be consid-
snow loads for structural design.” J. Struct. Engrg.
ered (see Section 7.7.1).
(ASCE), 109(4), 950–964.
hd (leeward step) = 3.8 ft (1.16 m) Elliott, M. (1975). “Snow load criteria for
(Fig. 7-9 with pg = 40 lb/ft2 (1.92 kN/m2) western United States, case histories and state-of-the-
and lu = 100 ft [30.5 m]) art.” In Proceedings of the First Western States
Conference of Structural Engineer Associations. Sun
hd (windward step) = 3/4 × 4.8 ft (1.5 m)
River, Ore.
= 3.6 ft (1.1 m) (4.8 ft [1.5 m]
Finney, E. (1939). “Snow drift control by
from Fig. 7-9 with pg = 40 lb/ft2 [1.92 kN/m2]
highway design.” Bulletin 86, Michigan State College
and lu = length of lower roof = 170 ft [52 m])
Engineering Station, Lansing, Mich.
Leeward drift governs, use hd = 3.8 ft (1.16 m) Grange, H. L., and Hendricks, L. T. (1976). Roof-
Because hd < hc, snow behavior and ice-dam prevention in residential
housing, University of Minnesota, Agricultural
hd = 3.8 ft (1.16 m)
Extension Service, St. Paul, Minn., Extension Bulletin
w = 4hd = 15.2 ft (4.64 m), say 15 ft (4.6 m)
399.
pd = hdγ = 3.8(19) = 72 lb/ft2
Irwin, P., William, C., Gamle, S., and Retziaff, R.
(in SI: pd = 1.16(3.02) = 3.50 kN/m2)
(1992). “Snow prediction in Toronto and the Andes
Rain on Snow Surcharge: A rain-on-snow Mountains; FAE simulation capabilities.” In
surcharge load need not be considered because pg is Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on
greater than 20 lb/ft2 (0.96 kN/m2). See Fig. C7-7 for Snow Engineering, Santa Barbara, Calif.
snow loads on both roofs. Isyumov, N., and Mikitiuk, M. (1992). “Wind
tunnel modeling of snow accumulation on large
roofs.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International
REFERENCES Conference on Snow Engineering, Santa Barbara,
Calif.
Air Structures Institute. (1977). “Design and Kennedy, D., Isyumov, M., and Mikitiuk, M.
standards manual.” Air Structures Institute, St. Paul, (1992). “The effectiveness of code provisions for
Minn., ASI-77 (available from the Industrial Fabrics snow accumulations on stepped roofs.” In
Assn. International, , 1977). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on
American Society of Civil Engineers. (1994). Air Snow Engineering, Santa Barbara, Calif.
supported structures, American Society of Civil Klinge, A. F. (1978). “Ice dams.” Popular
Engineers, New York. Science, 119–120.
Brown, J. (1970). “An approach to snow load Lorenzen, R. T. (1970). “Observations of snow
evaluation.” In Proceedings of the 38th Western Snow and wind loads precipitant to building failures in New
Conference. York State, 1969–1970.” American Society of
Colbeck, S. C. (1977a). “Roof loads resulting Agricultural Engineers North Atlantic Region
from rain-on-snow: Results of a physical model.” meeting, Paper NA 70-305, Newark, Del. [available
Can. J. Civil Engrg., 4, 482–490. from American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St.
Colbeck, S. C. (1977b). “Snow loads resulting Joseph, MO].
from rain-on-snow.” U.S. Dept. of the Army, Cold Lutes, D. A., and Schriever, W. R. (1971). “Snow
Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, accumulation in Canada: Case histories: II. Ottawa,
Hanover, N.H., CRREL Report 77-12. Ontario, Canada.” National Research Council of
Corotis, R. B., Dowding, C. H., and Rossow, E. Canada, DBR Technical Paper 339, NRCC 11915.
C. (1979). “Snow and ice accumulation at solar Mackinlay, I. (1988). “Architectural design in
collector installations in the Chicago metropolitan regions of snow and ice.” In Proceedings of the First
area.” U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of International Conference on Snow Engineering. Santa
Standards, Washington, D.C., NBS-GCR-79 181. Barbara, Calif., 441–455.
de Marne, H. (1988). “Field experience in control MacKinlay, I., and Willis, W. E. (1965). Snow
and prevention of leaking from ice dams in New country design, National Endowment for the Arts,
England.” In Proceedings of the First International Washington, D.C.

437

Com_c07.indd 437 4/14/2010 11:05:50 AM

You might also like