Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Guidance notes
The documentary assessment is focused on presenting and articulating the ‘story’ of your
participation in CoLab thereby capturing your feedback, the experience and providing a rationale
of vision, processes, negotiations and outcomes.
Your work will be given a mark according to the assessment criteria below. Please read them
carefully.
When referring to external sources please make sure to use the Trinity Laban citation guidelines.
Throughout CoLab you should document your interactions, rehearsals, planning and
performance. Whilst immersed in creative processes it is often challenging to reflect and evaluate
progress because you are immersed in making work. Therefore, you will need to capture evidence
of your experiences as they develop.
It is more important to record what happens rather than worry about quality of recordings or
images.
Organising and presenting your record of activities is a reflective activity in itself. You will need to
choose which methods communicate an effective picture of your project. This will involve a
combination of audio, visual and written materials.
A narrative diary of events in electronic format (word doc.) may be submitted with evidence.
You should discuss your submission and its content with your CoLab mentor.
CoLab MMus (7) Assignment
Module Leader Joe Townsend j.townsend@trinitylaban.ac.uk
PART 2 - Rationale - 1200 words (+ or - 10%)
Planning
To what extent was there a shared vision?
Did you have agreed goals?
What were the driving forces in terms of creative vision?
What were the processes and how were they negotiated?
Could you establish a series of benchmarks by which you could measure the success of
the collaboration?
In what way was your project innovative?
Attitudes
Discuss the group dynamic and leadership within the group.
What place did trust and respect play as a part of the project?
How did the group communicate and arrive at decisions as the project progressed?
How were any conflicts and difficult situations negotiated and resolved?
What impact did the project mentor have on the process and outcome?
Evaluation
Compare processes and outcomes;
Compare aims and objectives with outcomes;
What are the implications of your project?
In what way is your project significant?
What solutions as a result of your analysis?
What are your conclusions? Readdress the initial aims.
How would you improve the project if you were to run it again?
Call for action and recommendations.
You should refer to the CoLab Handbook on the CoLab main page in Moodle and the generic
CoLab reading list.
Assessment Criteria
NB. Your submission evidence is confidential and will only used for the purpose of giving feedback
and a grade – in some cases work may be used for examples or to demonstrate exceptional
practice, however the student’s permission will always be sought in these instances.