Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
The main problem in the transfer of personnel and equipment from a moving vessel to a fixed
offshore structure is the relative motion between vessel and structure. To overcome this problem,
this paper explores a new transfer method: the Ampelmann. This system consists of a vessel
mounted Stewart platform. By measuring the vessel motions and real-time control of the actuators in
the platform, the top deck becomes stationary compared to the fixed world, taking away all relative
motions.
The Ampelmann system can be installed on any PSV or anchor handler. Typical installation time is
8-12 hours. The unit is welded to the deck of the vessel and does not require additional deck
stiffening. It comes with its own power supply and motion sensor system and is therefore fully
independent of the vessel’s systems. The Ampelmann gangway can be used on any fixed offshore
structure without preparations. The rubber tip is pressed against a walkway, balcony or ladder and
the gangway control then switches to “free-floating” mode in which the gangway can telescope, slew
and luff passively, following any residual motions or slow drift motions of the vessel.
The advantage of full motion compensation is that the operations are always the same for both
operator and the crew transferring: in high or low waves conditions the unit is always stationary. The
current design has a cylinder stroke of 2m. This allows full compensation on a 50m vessel up to Hs =
2.5m and Hs = 3.0m on a 75m vessel. Maximum operating conditions to date were Hs = 2.8m and
wind speed of 7 Bft. Other criteria become limiting under these circumstances than the transfer
itself: walking the deck of the ship with green water on deck or wave spray hitting the spider deck.
For this concept a full scale Demonstrator was developed in 2007. The unit has performed a first
commercial project in the summer of 2008 and will be deployed on several other projects. 750
transfers have been performed in 170 landings visiting 8 different structures. This paper describes
the development of the technology and the safety considerations that have been the driving force in
all design steps. Furthermore, the test results and developments to the future are described.
Upon returning from Berlin, several experts were consulted on ship motions, flight simulators and measurement
systems. Several design studies were carried out to test the feasibility on paper. And with no extraordinary
results emanating from these studies, a scale model test was set up at the end of 2004.
Dry Testing
During the Dry Testing, the small Stewart platform was mounted on top of a larger Stewart platform as shown in
figure 2. This larger platform is called the Simonita and is located at the faculty of Mechanical Engineering of
the Delft University of Technology. Simonita can simulate the motions of a ship's deck in any sea state, which
then has to be compensated by the upper platform. This method allows the Ampelmann system to be tested in
various frequency ranges, and makes fine-tuning of the control system possible. The major advantage in this test
phase is the fact that the simulated motions are completely controllable and therefore allow thorough testing in a
safe fashion.
Demonstrator
Upon successful completion of the scale model test, a plan was drafted to prove the concept in real offshore
conditions. Backed by government subsidies and university and industry sponsoring (Shell, SMIT a.o.), a full
scale unit was designed, built and tested. The system design started in September 2006 and components were
ordered in January 2007. In May, the main components were finished and delivered to Heerema Zwijndrecht
where the Ampelmann team were granted work space to construct the unit. Figure 4 shows some steps in the
assembly process.
When the platform was assembled, the control software was tested. First one cylinder at a time was actuated,
then all six and the motion envelope was tested to see if all components could follow all positions of the
platform. These tests are shown in figure 5.
Figure 6 Motion compensation tests off the Port of Rotterdam, June & July 2007
A successful transfer was executed on Friday, December 14th 2007 at the offshore wind farm off the Dutch coast.
Figure 7 shows the images of the transfer.
This design approach led to the following components being doubled up in the design:
Figure 8 Alarm tree on transfer deck and control panel with platform
and gangway controls and failure mode status lights
After 15 practice runs, this procedure could be completed in 1-2 minutes. The connection time, before the
pressure on the tip of the gangway pushes the vessel away is approximately 30s. Enough to make successful and
safe transfers. With the system commissioned and tested, it went on its first commercial job in May 2008.
P14-A removal
SMIT Marine Projects was awarded the contract for the removal of Wintershall’s P14-A platform of the Dutch
coast. The Dutch HSE (SodM) required SMIT to use a more sophisticated transfer method than a passive
gangway. As sponsor of the Ampelmann Demonstrator a year earlier, SMIT decided to use the Ampelmann for
this job. As SodM had been involved in the development of the unit, it was aware of its capabilities and after a
final onshore demonstration, the use of the system was approved.
On May 19th, the system was mobilized to SMIT’s quayside for installation on the Taklift 4 on Thursday, May
22nd. The previous day, the T frame was already welded onto the deck and the installation comprised of bolting
the Ampelmann to the frame, installing the power packs and control container and connecting the hydraulics and
control wiring. Within 1 day the system was operational and load tested. Figure 10 shows the lifting of the unit
by the sheer leg barge Apollo and the load testing on the Taklift 4.
Figure 10 Lifting of the Ampelmann by the Apollo and load testing on the Taklift 4
To facilitate the transfer of the 18 men work force, a landing zone was installed on the spider deck. The landing
zone provides an easy target for the operator and a horizontal sliding plate and vertical bar to press the tip of the
gangway against during transfer. The hydraulics of the gangway are switch to “free floating” when on the
landing zone: the telescope cylinder is pressed outward, giving a contact force of 500 kg horizontally to follow
any residual motions. The luffing cylinders are pushing the gangway downwards with 50 kg vertical force.
Should residual motions require the gangway to move in the other direction, passive pressure relief valves allow
the gangway to follow. The slewing motion is followed passively by opening the slew valves in the free floating
mode.
For the preparation of the topside lift, the crew of 18 were transferred in the morning, shuttled for lunch and
retrieved in the evening.
The system had its first full test during the first days. Wind and waves increased to a 7 Bft summer storm with
significant wave heights up to 2.5 – 3m. As the visual estimation of the wave height proved to be impractical for
system operation, the vessel motion measurements and compensation simulation of the Ampelmann system was
used: when motions were within the Ampelmann envelop for a period of 15 minutes prior to intended transfer,
the operation could start. Eventually, the system was unable to operate for only 3 hours, where the conventional
gangway would not have been able to work for a full 5 days.
On June 5th, the topside was lifted off and sailed to the Port of Rotterdam, as shown in figure 13.
The jacket was removed in the following weeks as shown in figure 14.
DP-class PSV
The Ampelmann has been tested further in the North Sea in September 2008 and January 2009 on different
vessels. In September, the unit was mounted on the 50m long DP-I Esvagt Connector for a trip visiting several
Danish platforms. The unit was installed 3m above the deck to avoid major removal works on the vessel. The
higher location allowed the gangway to connect to balconies higher up on the offshore structures. The location
was less favourable for motion compensation, as roll motion translates to horizontal displacements larger than
the Ampelmann envelope for larger wave conditions. For future deployment, the unit needs to be installed at
deck level.
During the test 3 platforms and 1 buoy were visited and several landings were performed. An extensive
measurement campaign proved the correct working of the system. The DP system of the vessel is somewhat
influenced by the free-floating pressure of the gangway. During the tests, the Ampelmann operator and DP
operator did manage to include the influence in the DP control, preventing further interaction. After this, the DP
was stable. Figure 15 shows the Ampelmann on board the Esvagt Connector and landing on a monopile
platform.
Figure 15 Ampelmann on Esvagt Connector, a 50m long DP-1 vessel, and landing on a monopile
In January 2009, the Ampelmann was installed on board the Base Express. The vessel arrived on Monday at 9:00
AM, the deck was prepared, the Ampelmann installed and tested and the vessel set sail on Tuesday 18:00. A test
was performed upon arrival the next day from 9:00-17:00. On Thursday the Ampelmann system was on the quay
side again. A round trip including mob and de-mob in 4 days.
The system was tested on the L7 platform on the Dutch Continental Shelf. Several vessel headings were tried:
head, beam and stern waves. During the tests, DP failure modes were tested and proved the operation could
continue without problem. Figure 16 shows the Ampelmann during installation and testing on the Base Express
in the Port of Rotterdam and landing on several angles at the L7 platform.
Figure 16 Ampelmann installed and tested on the Base Express
and operating under different headings at the L7 platform
Currently a new Ampelmann system is under construction. It will start operation on a job in the UK early June
2009. The new system has been improved on details with lessons learned from the Demonstrator. The main
changes are the length of the gangway being extended to maximum 20m and the hydraulic hoses being placed on
the inside. Ampelmann is set on making their motto an industry standard: