Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S
leep disruption is a common, yet of- lence as high as 50%.1 Postoperative sleep Harrison St, Ste 300, Chicago, IL 60612 (blaine.
manning08@gmail.com).
ten ignored, problem among patients disturbance is often reciprocal to night pain Received: January 21, 2017; Accepted: Feb-
before and after total joint arthro- and remains a mediator in the relationship ruary 27, 2017.
plasty (TJA), with a postoperative preva- between early postoperative pain and func- doi: 10.3928/01477447-20170411-01
and types of new sleeping methods em- Statistical analyses were conduct-
Table 1 ployed by TJA patients to alleviate these ed with Stata version 13.1 software
effects. (StataCorp LLP, College Station, Texas).
Patient Demographics
Responses were compared between time
(N=105)
Materials and Methods points using the signed-rank test (for con-
Demographic Value Following institutional review board tinuous variables) or McNemar’s test (for
Sex, No. (%) approval, patients scheduled for THA binary variables). Responses were com-
Male 43 (41) or TKA to be performed by 2 surgeons pared between THA and TKA patients us-
Female 62 (59) (S.M.S., B.R.L.) were approached for en- ing the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (for con-
Age, mean±SD, y 62.5±11.7 rollment during their preoperative clinic tinuous variables) or Pearson’s chi-square
Current tobacco use, 8 (7.6) appointment by means of convenience test (for binary variables). The level of
No. (%) sampling. The study was conducted in significance was set at P<.05.
Surgery, No. (%) an outpatient clinic office at a single aca-
Primary TKA 62 (59) demic medical center located in an urban Results
Primary THA 43 (41) setting. Table 1 contains respondents’ demo-
Study surveys were administered graphic data. There was a slight major-
Abbreviations: THA, total hip
arthroplasty; TKA, total knee during 3 discreet time periods. The first ity of female participants (59% female
arthroplasty. section was administered during the pa- vs 41% male). The mean±SD patient age
tient’s preoperative clinic appointment at was 62.5±11.7 years. Most participants
the time of enrollment. Questionnaires underwent primary TKA (59% primary
demand for TJA and an evolving health included demographics and medical his- TKA vs 41% primary THA).
care landscape. By 2030, total hip arthro- tory, current sleeping habits, the Epworth Table 2 includes responses from the
plasty (THA) utilization is projected to Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and perspectives preoperative, early postoperative (4.7±2.0
nearly triple from 2005 levels to almost on the association between sleep qual- weeks), and late postoperative (40.8±19.5
600,000 cases per year.4 Demand for to- ity, joint replacement, and daily activi- weeks) periods. Patients reported sig-
tal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is also ex- ties. The ESS is a standardized, validated nificant increases in length of time to
pected to increase more than 650% from questionnaire used to assess daytime fall asleep during the early postoperative
2005 levels to nearly 3.5 million cases sleepiness. It consists of 8 questions that period (P=.006). Mean nightly awak-
annually.4 The use of patient satisfaction ask respondents to rate, on a 4-point scale, enings increased early postoperatively
and outcome measures in reimbursement their typical chance of falling asleep or (P=.002) and decreased late postopera-
systems also continues to intensify. Sleep dozing off while engaged in various dai- tively (P<.001) compared with preop-
quality remains an important determinant ly activities. Epworth Sleepiness Scale erative baseline. The overall percentage
of postoperative pain and functional re- scores range from 0 to 24 (sum of 8 item of patients expressing a desire for better
covery, both of which can impact such scores, 0-3), with a higher score indicat- sleep quality decreased from 70.2% at
outcome measures and patients’ experi- ing a greater propensity for daytime sleep- preoperative baseline to 44.7% late post-
ence. This paradigm shift toward a “pay- iness. The second and third sections were operatively (P<.001). Patients expressing
for-performance” system underlines the administered during the first (2-3 weeks) a desire for longer sleep duration also
importance of optimizing all aspects of and second (4-8 weeks) postoperative decreased from 59.1% preoperatively to
TJA patients’ postoperative course, in- clinic appointments, respectively. All 41.2% late postoperatively (P<.001). Use
cluding sleep quality. Although previous clinic appointments followed the authors’ of sleep medications and ESS scores did
studies have revealed sleep disturbance routine pathways and standard-of-care not change significantly after TJA com-
in the weeks and early months following protocols. For enrolled patients who did pared with preoperative values. Overall
TKA,2,5-7 studies that prospectively assess not return for one of their postoperative pre- or postoperative responses did not
preoperative, early postoperative, and late clinic appointments, results were attained differ significantly between THA and
postoperative sleep quality after primary by phone or mail during the appropriate TKA patients (Table 3).
THA and TKA are lacking. follow-up period. The second and third Table 4 details new methods used by
The purposes of this study were to pro- survey sections were virtually identical to patients to improve sleep postoperatively.
spectively assess the incidence and dura- the first section, other than questions be- Nearly 40% of patients reported trying a
tion of postoperative sleep disturbance ing modified to reflect the postoperative new sleeping method, with the most com-
after TJA and to determine the incidence phase. mon being new pillow placement (~33%
Table 3
No Significant Difference Between Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty Patient
Responses
Preoperative Early Postoperativea Late Postoperativeb
Sleep-Related Factor THA TKA P THA TKA Pc THA TKA Pc
Mean time to fall asleep, min 16.4 15.4 .559 16.7 19.2 .206 15.0 14.5 .732
Mean nightly sleep duration, h 6.2 6.5 .854 6.4 6.0 .130 6.5 6.6 .330
Mean nightly awakenings, No. 2.7 2.3 .223 2.8 3.0 .465 1.8 1.9 .387
Patients wishing for better sleep quality 76.7% 65.6% .220 58.1% 67.7% .314 51.2% 40.0% .261
Patients wishing for longer sleep duration 67.4% 53.2% .145 58.1% 63.9% .550 51.2% 33.9% .080
Sleep qualityd 3.2 3.4 .074 3.3 3.2 .708 3.5 3.7 .260
Impact of sleep difficulties on daily livingd 2.1 1.9 .112 2.0 2.0 .904 1.8 1.7 .545
Current sleep medication use 18.6% 25.8% .387 18.6% 19.4% .923 25.6% 25.0% .947
Current antidepressant use 11.6% 22.6% .152 11.6% 21.3% .199 16.3% 27.1% .196
Epworth Sleepiness Scale score 6.3 5.4 .229 6.2 5.8 .778 6.5 5.1 .065
Abbreviations: THA, total hip arthroplasty; TKA, total knee arthroplasty.
a
At 4.7±2.0 weeks.
b
At 40.8±19.5 weeks.
c
P values compared with preoperative value.
d
As reported on 1–5 scale.
E, Greene K, Delahanty DL. Sleep disrup- uation of sleep disturbances after total knee thritis: predictors of enrollment in a random-
tions mediate the relationship between early arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(1):330- ized treatment trial. J Psychosom Res. 2011;
postoperative pain and later functioning fol- 332. 71(5):296-299.
lowing total knee replacement surgery. J Be- 8. Büyükyilmaz FE, Şendir M, Acaroğlu R. 13. Herrero-Sánchez MD, García-Iñigo Mdel
hav Med. 2006; 29(2):215-222. Evaluation of night-time pain characteristics C, Nuño-Beato-Redondo BS, Fernández-
3. Hawker GA, Stewart L, French MR, et al. and quality of sleep in postoperative Turkish de-Las-Peñas C, Alburquerque-Sendín F.
Understanding the pain experience in hip and orthopedic patients. Clin Nurs Res. 2011; Association between ongoing pain intensity,
knee osteoarthritis: an OARSI/OMERACT 20(3):326-342. health-related quality of life, disability and
initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008; quality of sleep in elderly people with total
9. Cho CH, Lee SW, Lee YK, Shin HK, Hwang
16(4):415-422. knee arthroplasty. Cien Saude Colet. 2014;
I. Effect of a sleep aid in analgesia after ar-
19(6):1881-1888.
4. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. throscopic rotator cuff repair. Yonsei Med J.
Projections of primary and revision hip and 2015; 56(3):772-777. 14. Myoji Y, Fujita K, Mawatari M, Tabuchi Y.
knee arthroplasty in the United States from Changes in sleep-wake rhythms, subjective
10. Dolan R, Huh J, Tiwari N, Sproat T,
2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; sleep quality and pain among patients under-
Camilleri-Brennan J. A prospective analy-
89(4):780-785. going total hip arthroplasty. Int J Nurs Pract.
sis of sleep deprivation and disturbance in
2015; 21(6):764-770.
5. Krenk L, Jennum P, Kehlet H. Sleep distur- surgical patients. Ann Med Surg (Lond).
bances after fast-track hip and knee arthro- 2016; 6:1-5. 15. Krenk L, Jennum P, Kehlet H. Activity, sleep
plasty. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109(5):769-775. and cognition after fast-track hip or knee ar-
11. Sasaki E, Tsuda E, Yamamoto Y, et al. Noc-
throplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(8):1265-
6. Er MS, Altinel EC, Altinel L, Erten RA, turnal knee pain increases with the severity of
1269.
Eroğlu M. An assessment of sleep quality in knee osteoarthritis, disturbing patient sleep
patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty quality. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014; 16. Fielden JM, Gander PH, Horne JG, Lewer
before and after surgery. Acta Orthop Trau- 66(7):1027-1032. BM, Green RM, Devane PA. An assessment
matol Turc. 2014; 48(1):50-54. of sleep disturbance in patients before and
12. McCurry SM, Von Korff M, Vitiello MV, et
after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty.
7. Chen AF, Orozco FR, Austin LS, Post ZD, al. Frequency of comorbid insomnia, pain,
2003; 18(3):371-376.
Deirmengian CA, Ong AC. Prospective eval- and depression in older adults with osteoar-