Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jamison Neal
Ms. Cook
Composition
Annotated Bibliography
Formatted: Left
Administrator. Chapter 1: The Dangers of Nuclear Weapons: Myths and Facts. Ch. 1: The
Dangers from Nuclear Weapons: Myths and Facts - Nuclear War Survival Skills,
what would happen if a nuclear fallout would happen. It goes over actual dangers and
what precautions americans should take. I'm using this to my advantage to counter my
proposal. One myth is that Fallout radiation from a nuclear war would poison the air
and all parts of the environment. It would kill everyone. After stating that this is a myth
the article explains why this is untrue and provides an actual fact and backs it up with
support. In hindsight this is a bad way to debunk and prove your opponents wrong
Neal 2
because you are not stating where the myth is coming from, but Im using them as an
The Biggest and Most Powerful Nuclear Weapons Ever Built. Army Technology, 1 Apr. 2014,
www.army-technology.com/features/featurethe-biggest-and-most-powerful-nuclear-
weapons-ever-built-4206787/. The website from Army Technology list the most powerful
bombs ever created and tested by mainly the U.S and the Soviet Union. I'm using this site
mostly to fact check my information. Making sure my statistics are accurate for the
bombs and how deadly they can be. Such bombs include the Tsar bomb, the B41, TX 21,
the MK 17, the MK 24, the Ivy Mike H bomb, and many others. All can be very deadly
How Nuclear War Would Affect Earths Climate. EarthSky, 8 Sept. 2017,
Instead of focusing on the bomb itself and how destructive they are the article goes into
depth of the aftermaths, specifically climate. Just a small nuclear exchange between two
fahrenheit similar to that of the little ice age. Now if two bigger nuclear powerhouses
last seen during the great ice age. Aftermaths of a nuclear war would also include nuclear
audience for why nuclear weapons are morally wrong to use or to even posses.
Neal 3
9652-
0e15d52822fe%40sessionmgr4008&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#AN=1232
02554&db=f5h. This peer reviewed journal conducts many different test and experiments
to determine the dangers of nuclear radioactivity at ground zero, the area of detonation.
More specifically the test area known as Bikini Atoll. Here the U.S detonated nuclear
bombs over and under the sea. The ones detonated underwater created tsunamis that
destroyed the beaches and sent radioactive particles 2,000 feet into the air. And scientist
from all over the world were there to witness the aftermaths of nuclear detonation. The
U.S wanted to prove that their bombs could be used safely and as a demonstration hooked
livestock up to the ships to see if they would survive the initial blast of radiation.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs1CIrwg5zU&list=LLCJRYIsIDqg03TY_HsMzK-
w&index=2. This video on youtube has extensive graphs and maps of nuclear detonations
and their effects on the world. This video in particular is interesting because it compares
the destructive powers of nuclear weapons by showing you the area of impact centralized
on New York City. ranging from bombs dropped at hiroshima to the Tsar bomb, the most
powerful bomb ever detonated. Nuclear weapons have come a long way and come in all
types of different sizes. Some are relatively small while others are enormous, so big they
boggle the mind at what they can be capable of. This video analyzes the sizes and
impacts of various different nuclear devices, the history of nuclear weapons and what
Neal 4
countries in the world are in possession of such devices. The video states that most of
the nuclear arsenal belongs to the U.S and Russia, and this is backed by countless
statements by the U.S and Russia themselves. However most of the bombs are not in
commissioned and will never be fired, nevertheless they are still there.
eds.a.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=21098a7f-8a73-4a9a-a96c-
a85fd4895821%40sessionmgr4009&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3d#AN=1249
88558&db=f5h. This peer reviewed journal is also one i will be analyzing for my counter
arguments because it makes very good claims and valid points. The main gist is that the
U.S needs to improve their weapons, modernize them and not dismantle them like im
proposing. This is because of the fear of our enemies such as Russia, North Korea, and
China. The conclusion summarises the author's points better than I can:; Opponents of
stability of nuclear deterrence and how it shapes the actions of the civilian and uniformed
leaders of Russia, China, and the United States. Nuclear weapons are more than simple
political weapons that exist to deter the use of other nuclear weapons. For Russia, in
particular, nuclear weapons are weapons of war and integrated into Russian warfighting
doctrine. To credibly deter Russian aggression, the United States must also treat nuclear
weapons as not only tools of deterrence but warfighting weapons. In this regard, Air
Force Global Strike Command is correct. With a motto of deter, assure, strike, the
command is effectively conveying that the United States has the will and ability to
deliver devastating effects to anyone who challenges Americas core interests. We should
Neal 5
never forget that maintaining the capability to carry out any threat is central to the
stability of deterrence.
Annotations: All resources are All resources are All resources are All resources are
Attempt annotated annotated annotated annotated
3 = Demonstrated
Bibliography/Works
Cited (1) All resources are All resources are All resources are All resources are
3 = Demonstrated correctly cited in correctly cited in correctly cited in correctly cited in
MLA or APA MLA or APA MLA or APA MLA or APA
Neal 6
Bibliography/Works
Cited (2) All resources are All resources are All resources are All resources are
3 = Demonstrated correctly cited in correctly cited in correctly cited in correctly cited in
MLA or APA MLA or APA MLA or APA MLA or APA
format format format format
Content Knowledge: Use of content area Use of content area Use of content area Use of content area
Word Choice vocabulary is vocabulary is vocabulary is vocabulary is
3 = Demonstrated consistently precise consistently precise consistently precise consistently precise
and accurate and accurate and accurate and accurate
Sources: Variety Cited sources Cited sources Cited sources Cited sources
3 = Demonstrated represent various represent various represent various represent various
genres (ex. genres (ex. genres (ex. genres (ex.
literature, scholarly literature, scholarly literature, scholarly literature, scholarly
journal, journal, journal, journal,
encyclopedia, news encyclopedia, news encyclopedia, news encyclopedia, news
article, etc) article, etc) article, etc) article, etc)
Sources: Credibility All cited sources All cited sources All cited sources All cited sources
3 = Demonstrated come from come from come from come from
authoritative authoritative authoritative authoritative
resources resources resources resources
Sources: All resources are All resources are All resources are All resources are
Appropriateness appropriate for appropriate for appropriate for appropriate for
3 = Demonstrated target audience target audience target audience target audience
Quantity of Sources Document cites the Document cites the Document cites the Document cites the
3 = Demonstrated number of sources number of sources number of sources number of sources
outlined in the outlined in the outlined in the outlined in the
assignment assignment assignment assignment
Quality of Sources All sources cited can All sources cited can All sources cited can All sources cited can
3 = Demonstrated be considered be considered be considered be considered
reliable and/or reliable and/or reliable and/or reliable and/or
trustworthy trustworthy trustworthy trustworthy
Comments:
Neal 7
Good job finding a variety of sources on your topic. You're definitely looking at the issue from
all angles. I really look forward to reading this paper. Furthermore, each sources is thoroughly
summarized and explained. Nice work!