Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274965482
Diatoms As Bioindicators
CITATIONS READS
0 524
3 authors:
T V Ramachandra
Indian Institute of Science
904 PUBLICATIONS 4,936 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by T V Ramachandra on 15 April 2015.
DIATOMS AS BIOINDICATORS
Ram S. Hattikudur, Alakananda B. & Ramachandra T. V1,2,3,*
1
Energy & Wetlands Research Group, Centre for Ecological Sciences,
2
Centre for Sustainable Technologies (astra)
3
Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning [CiSTUP]
4
National Remote Sensing Centre, Department of Space, Government of India, Hyderabad,
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 012, India
http://wgbis.ces.iisc.ernet.in/energy; http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/foss
*Corresponding Author: cestvr@ces.iisc.ernet.in
Wetlands are considered to be one of the main Inorganic frustules that are preserved
biological hotspots. They are also sinks for even after death
pollution. Today, wetlands are one of the most High sensitivity
threatened habitats in India, often converted for Expenses being low
agriculture, industry or settlements. Many are Complementarity to conventional
affected by industrial effluents, sewage, methods.
household wastes and sedimentation. Therefore Diatoms belong to a unicellular, photosynthetic
they must be protected from adverse group of algae whose cell walls are made of
anthropogenic effects, so they can recover. thick layers of silica. They are found where
Several physical and chemical variables in the sunlight and water are available in episammic,
water are affected by these factors. Thus, water epilithic or epiphytic habitat. They have been
quality monitoring helps maintain our used as bio-indicators in North America
understanding of these conditions to protect (Potapova and Charles, 2007); Africa (Taylor et
them. al. 2007a); India (Alakananda et al., 2011) and
so on. The impact of anthropogenic stress on
Bio-monitoring is the biological assessment of benthic diatom distribution is evident from
these various effects on the ecosystem. It is more studies of streams, ponds and lakes (Soininen et
effective than water quality analysis in terms of al. 2004; Reid and Ogden 2009).
expenses and accuracy as it involves biological
organisms inhabiting the region. Usually, many In this study diatom diversity was investigated
microorganisms can be used for bio-monitoring. in two lakes. The water quality variables were
Algae are particularly chosen in this paper also assessed to understand the pollution levels.
because of their high sensitivity to changes. Two lakes were selected: Neelagondanahalli
Various indices are developed and used based on lake in Neelagondanahalli and a lake located
species sensitivity to pollution. Amongst algae, near Jalahalli, locally known as Chikkabanavara
diatoms have been chosen as they are most lake. These represent two different zones, the
useful owing to their: former being in the Industrial zone and the
Easy availability and occurrence latter in the Residential zone of Bangalore.
METHOD
Two diatom samples were collected from each were prepared using standard methods as per
lake from epiphytic and episammic habitat Karthick et al., 2011. Diatom communities
during November-December 2012 and slides were then analysed by counting between 250-
300 valves. During enumeration the collected along with diatom samples. Physical
dimensions of diatom valve characteristics, variables like pH, temperature, electric
like length, width and straie densities in 10 m conductivity, salinity and total dissolved solids
were measured. Identification of diatoms was were measured using EXTECH combo probe.
carried out using taxonomic guides (Gandhi, Trophic diatom indices were calculated from
1998; Lange-Bertalot, 2001; Krammer, 2002; community counts using OMNIDIA version
Taylor et al., 2007b). Water samples were also 5.3.
TABLE 1.1: Characteristics of the two lakes
Neelagondanahalli Chikkabanavara
Latitude/Longitude 1324'58.06"N 13 4'52.13"N
7714'32.98"E 7730'26.76"E
Zone Industrial Residential
Observations Surrounded by industries and Forested area with little
slums housing
Water discoloured Relatively clear
Rubber footwear spotted Plastic and polyethene spotted
Only people walking People washing
Lower diversity of birds clothes/bathing
Greater diversity of birds
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figure 1: Abundance of diatoms belonging to different genera across the four samples
CR1and CR2 are samples 1 and 2 of Chikkabanavara and NR1 and NR2 are samples 1 and 2
of Neelagondanahalli
Table 1.3: Water quality results
Neelagond
Neelagondanahalli Chikkabanavara Chikkabanavara
Lake Sample: anahalli
lake (NR2) lake (CR1) lake (CR2)
lake (NR1)
Plant and
Substrate Plant Plant Plant
Sediment
pH 7.2 7.3 7.2 7.6
TDS (ppm) 1229 1226 588 630
Dissolved oxygen mg/L) 5.5 6.2 6.5 -
Water temperature (C) 25 25 25 23
Air temperature (C) 24 24 28.5 29
Chlorides (mg/L) 23 24.5 9 8.5
Total hardness (mg/L) 14.5 15 8.4 11
Calcium Hardness mg/L) 6.1 5.9 4.1 8
Alkalinity (mg/L) 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.1
*Permissible limits of DO for clean lakes is above 5mg/l, TDS is below 1500 ppm for
drinking water, pH is 7-9.
The pollution levels of the lakes have been Where aj = abundance or proportion of valves
estimated using Trophic Diatom Index (TDI). of species* j in sample, sj = pollution
The formula is: sensitivity (1-5) of species j and vj = indicator
value (1-3). Values of sensitivity (s)
*A diatom cell wall consists of two valves in
total. (Trophic diatom index, a users manual.
Revised edition, 2001)
Table 1.2: TDI values for the lake samples *Where 0-20 are clean waters, 21-40 mild
pollution, 41-60 bad waters, 61-100 severely
Trophic Diatom polluted, according to the Trophic Diatom
Sample Index Index.
CR1 67
CR2 65.5 Therefore, it can be concluded that
NR1 56.5 Chikkabanawara is actually severely polluted
NR2 59 while Neelagondanahalli may be considered
bad waters.
CONCLUSION
Concluding, both lakes were found to be CR2. This is possibly a consequence of industrial
extremely polluted. TDI was found to be 56.5 for effluents in the former and untreated sewage
NR1 and 59 for NR2, 67 for CR1 and 65.5 for disposal in the latter.
REFERENCES
1. Alakananda, B., Karthick, B., Mahesh, M.K. and Ramachandra, T.V. 2011. Diatom-Based Pollution
Monitoring in Urban Wetlands, The IUP Journal of Soil and Water Sciences, Vol. IV, No. 2, pp. 33-52, May
2011.)
2. Blanco, S., Ector, L. and Bcares, E. (2004). Epiphytic diatoms as water quality indicators in Spanish shallow
lakes. Vie Milieu, 54 (23): 7179.
3. Gandhi, H.P. (1998). Freshwater Diatoms of Central Gujarat. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh. Dehra Dun.
4. Karthick, B., Taylor, J.C., Mahesh, M.K. and Ramachandra, T.V. (2010). Protocols for Collection, Preservation
and Enumeration of Diatoms from Aquatic Habitats for Water Quality Monitoring in India. The IUP Journal of
Soil and Water Sciences, 3(1): 136.
5. Lange-Bertalot, H. (2001). Navicula sensu stricto, 10 genera separated from Navicula sensu lato, Frustulia.
Diatoms of Europe 2: 1526.
6. Potapova, M., Charles, D.F. (2007). Diatom metrics for monitoring eutrophication in rivers of the United States.
Ecological Indicators 7: 4870.
7. Ramachandra, T. V, Alakananda, B., Rani, A. and Khan, M. A. (2011). Ecological and Socio-Economic
Assessment of Varthur Wetland, Bengaluru (India). Journal of Environmental Science & Engineering, 53(1):
101108.
8. Reid, M.A. and Ogden, R.W. (2009). The importance of habitat, biogeography hydrology as drivers of diatom
distributions in floodplain lakes of the southeast Murray Basin (Australia) implications for palaeolimnological
studies. Journal of Paleolimnology, 41(3): 453470.
9. Soininen, J. (2004). Benthic Diatom Community Structure in Boreal Streams; Distribution Patterns along
Environmental and Spatial Gradients. Academic Dissertation in Limnology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
10. Taylor, J.C., Prygiel, J., Vosloo, A., de la Rey, P.A and Van Rensberg, L. (2007a). Can diatom-based pollution
indices be used for biomonitoring in South Africa? A case study of the Crocodile West Marico water
management area. Hydrobiologia, 592: 455464.
11. Taylor, J.C., Harding, W.R. and Archibald, C.G.M. (2007b). An Illustrated Guide to Some Common Diatom
Species from South Africa. WRC Report TT. p 282.
12. Trophic Diatom Index, A Users Manual. Revised edition, 2001 (1-135).