Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PART 1:
BASIC PRINCIPLES
V. Judicial Legislation
Floresca vs. Philex Mining, G.R. No. L-30642 April 30, 1985
Republic vs. CA and Molina, G.R. No. 108763, February 13, 1997
VI. Spirit over Letter of the Law (Ratio Legis Est Anima Legis)
VII. The construction of the law obtains the force of law (Legis
interpretatio legis vim obtinet)
1
EXECUTIVE CONSTRUCTION
Victorias Milling Co. Inc. vs. Social Security Commission, G.R. No. L-
16704, March 17, 1962
PART 3:
CONSTRUCTION OF SPECIFIC TYPES OF LEGISLATION
I. Constitution
Retirement Laws
Tantuico, Jr. vs Domingo, G.R. No. 96422, February 28, 1994
Tax Burdens
Philacor Credit Corporation Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R.
No. 169899, February 6, 2013
Tax Exemptions
Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs Guerrero, G.R. No. L-20942,
September 22, 1967
Tax Refunds
Applied Food Ingredients vs Commissioner of Internal Revenue,
G.R. No. 184266, November 11, 2013
2
IV. Penal Laws
V. Election Laws
VI. Insurance
IX. Wills
X. Rules of Court
PART 4:
LATIN RULES
3
I. Verba Legis Non Est Recedendum (From the words of the
statute, there should be no departure)
II. Ratio Legis Est Anima Legis (The reason of the law is the soul
of the law)
III. Dura Lex Sed Lex (The law is harsh but that is the law)
Duncan vs. CFI of Rizal, G.R. No. L-30576, February 10, 1976
Alonzo vs. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. No. L-72873, May 28,
1987
V. Ejusdem Generis
4
Liwag vs Happy Glen Loop Homeowners Association, G.R. No.
189755, July 4, 2012
Mutuc vs. COMELEC , G.R. No. L-32717, November 26, 1970
United States vs. Victor Santo Nino, G.R. No. 5000, March 11, 1909
City of Manila vs. Lyric Music House, G.R. No. 42236, September 24,
1935
Roman Catholic Archbishop vs. Social Security Commission G.R. No.
L-15045, January 20, 1961
Colgate vs. Gimenez, G.R. No. L-14787, January 28, 1961
VI. Casus Omissus Pro Omiso Habendus Est (A Thing Omitted Must
have Been Ommitted Intentionally)
Spouses Delfino vs. St. James Hospital, G.R. No. 166735, November
23, 2007
VIII. Ubi lex non distinguit nec nos distinguere debemos (Where the
law does not distinguish, the courts should not distinguish)
Philippine British Assurance vs. IAC, G.R. No. 72005, May 29, 1987
Banco de Oro vs. Equitable Bank, G.R. No. 74917, January 20, 1988
Spouses Salenillas vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 78687, January
31, 1989
Demafiles vs. COMELEC, G.R. No. L-28396, December 29, 1967