4 views

Uploaded by hexxa3000

lv tieng anh

- 2-ADM01-D2-019
- defense paper
- GM Acronyms
- Screw Conveyor
- 50_20T x 29.5m DG Crane _R3
- Catalogo Netzsch.pdf
- BD50
- 4传动系统(行星 YD13).pdf
- Sumitomo Hs m
- Tech Notes
- Wheel Model 6 Catalog
- AL4 Solenoids
- Br Cat Cafs Ie2 Eng r00 0
- LB 28 Data Sheet En_8150-0
- DAMPING ANALYSIS OF HIGH GRADE STEEL ALLOY DRIVE SHAFT IN AUTOMOBILE.pdf
- coupling_hoist cam switch.pdf
- M.tech.Automobile Engineering
- Muana Hydraulic CVT
- bmk_ltm_1100-4_1_uw_von_063353_bis_063448_0000000_en
- Lecture03- Dynamic Force Analysis

You are on page 1of 189

the automobile

Raffaele Di Martino

Raffaele Di Martino. Modelling and simulation of the dynamic behaviour of the automobile.

Automatic. Universite de Haute Alsace - Mulhouse, 2005. English.

https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00736040

Submitted on 27 Sep 2012

archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinee au depot et a la diffusion de documents

entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publies ou non,

lished or not. The documents may come from emanant des etablissements denseignement et de

teaching and research institutions in France or recherche francais ou etrangers, des laboratoires

abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou prives.

Universit degli Studi di Salerno

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING

Course of degree in Mechanical Engineering

Thesis of degree

Modelling and Simulation of the Dynamic Behaviour of

the Automobile

Author: Supervisor:

Di Martino Raffaele Professor Grard Lon Gissinger

Matr. 165/000101

Co-Supervisor:

Professor Gianfranco Rizzo

Academic year 2004/2005

Title of degree

the Automobile

by

Di Martino Raffaele

University of Salerno

Author: Supervisor:

Matr. 165/000101 Co-Supervisor:

Professor G. Rizzo

Modelling and Simulation of the Dynamic Behaviour

of the Automobile

Raffaele Di Martino

Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

This study, carried out in cooperation with ESSAIM, Ecole Suprieure des Sciences

Appliques pour lIngnieur, Mulhouse in France, was aimed at developing accurate

mathematical models of some types of tyre, in order to analyze their influence on

vehicle dynamics. The complete vehicle was studied under dynamic conditions, to

quantify the influence of all factors, such as rolling forces, aerodynamic forces and

many others, acting on their components on torque distribution and vehicle dynamics.

Mathematical models for two common types of vehicle, namely front and rear wheel

drive, each ones equipped with the different types of tyre, were developed. Both models

were used to simulate the behaviour of a real vehicle, developing complete simulation

software, developed in Matlab-Simulink environment at MIPS, Modlisation

Intelligence Processus Systmes. Therefore, this car model, running on a straight and

curve track, was also developed, to get a qualitative insight of the influence of these

kinds of interactions on traction capabilities. The software, used to simulate some

dynamics manoeuvres, shows up the basic behaviour of vehicle dynamics.

_________________________________________________________________________________ i

Dedication

_________________________________________________________________________________ ii

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my gratitude to some of the people who contributed to this work.

First, I would like to thank my Professor G. Rizzo for his guidance and direction in the

development and conduct of this research. I would like to thank Professor G.L.

Gissinger, my advisor for the duration, for supporting me during my time here at

ESSAIM, Ecole Suprieure des Sciences Appliques pour lIngnieur, Mulhouse in

France. During these six months they have also been friendly and I sincerely hope we

find opportunities in the future to work together once again. Conteins

Professor Michel Basset and Assistant Professor Jean Philippe Lauffenburger must also

be mentioned for their insightful comments that have exemplified the work during the

development of my thesis.

I would also like to extend my thank to Doctor Engineer Ivan Arsie and Professor

Cesare Pianese for their encouragement and invaluable assistance.

Anyone who was around when I began my work knows that I have to express my

gratitude to Engineer Eduardo Haro Sandoval, for his patience, expertise, and support

during my six moths in the Research Laboratory. Many thanks must be given to Ing.

Julien Caroux, for his assistance in developing and programming the software dedicated

to study about the behaviour of the vehicle. Both, friendship have made the last six

months very enjoyable.

Above anyone else I would like to thank, Engineer Alfonso Di Domenico and Engineer

Michele Maria Marotta, who, trough their assistance have made some moments could

be overcome easily.

Lastly, I would like to thank my parents, and other people close to me for giving me the

opportunity to come to the University of Haute-Alsace. They have been a tremendous

emotional and psychological support to me throughout these few months and for that I

am eternally thankful. I sincerely believe that this work would not exist without their

guidance and support.

_________________________________________________________________________________ iii

Table of Contents

Abstract............................................................................................................................. i

Dedication ........................................................................................................................ii

Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................iii

Table of Contents ........................................................................................................... iv

List of Figures................................................................................................................. vi

List of Tables ................................................................................................................... x

List of Symbols ............................................................................................................... xi

1 Introduction.................................................................................................................. 1

1.1 Historical Notes on Vehicles ............................................................................. 1

1.2 Thesis Outline .................................................................................................... 5

2 Vehicle Dynamics......................................................................................................... 7

2.1 Motivation for Studying Vehicle Dynamics ...................................................... 7

2.2 Motivation for this Research.............................................................................. 9

2.2.1 Research Objective ................................................................................. 10

2.2.2 Literature Review ................................................................................... 10

3 Vehicle Dynamics Modelling..................................................................................... 15

3.1 Axis System ..................................................................................................... 15

3.1.1 Earth-Fixed Axis System ........................................................................ 16

3.1.2 Vehicle Axis System............................................................................... 16

3.2 Mechanism of Pneumatic Tyres ...................................................................... 18

3.2.1 Force Acting Between Road and Wheel................................................. 18

3.2.2 Constitutive Equations............................................................................ 31

4 Longitudinal Dynamics Model ................................................................................. 38

4.1 Physical Model ................................................................................................ 38

4.2 Powertrain Modelling ...................................................................................... 40

4.2.1 Engine Model: Characteristics of Internal Combustion Engines............ 41

4.2.2 Gear Box and Torque Converter............................................................. 44

4.3 Driver Model.................................................................................................... 44

4.4 Equivalent Dynamic System............................................................................ 44

4.4.1 Reduction of Forces Acting on the Vehicle............................................ 49

4.4.2 Reduction of Inertias of the Vehicle ....................................................... 54

4.5 Simulation for longitudinal Model with Gearbox............................................ 67

4.5.1 Method of Vehicle-Simulation ............................................................... 67

4.5.2 Simulation Results .................................................................................. 68

5 Lateral Dynamics Model ........................................................................................... 75

5.1 Working Hypotheses........................................................................................ 75

5.2 Theoretical Model............................................................................................ 76

5.2.1 Equations of Congruence........................................................................ 78

5.2.2 Equations of Equilibrium........................................................................ 84

5.2.3 Constitutive Equations............................................................................ 88

5.3 Single-Track Model ......................................................................................... 89

5.4 Two/Four-Degree-of-Freedom Vehicle Model Derivation ............................. 89

_________________________________________________________________________________ iv

List of Contens________________________________________________________________________

5.5.1 Rear Traction Model (RWD) .................................................................. 91

5.5.2 Front Traction Model (FWD) ............................................................... 106

5.5.3 Conclusions........................................................................................... 111

6 Simulink Environment Model ................................................................................ 113

6.1 Simulink Modelling ....................................................................................... 113

6.2 Simulating a Complete Vehicle ..................................................................... 114

6.2.1 Driver Behaviour .................................................................................. 115

6.2.2 Powertrain Modelling ........................................................................... 116

6.2.3 Vehicle Dynamics................................................................................. 122

6.2.4 Tyre Model ........................................................................................... 128

6.2.5 Real time Simulator Block.................................................................... 132

7 Validation of the Vehicle Model ............................................................................. 135

7.1 The Simulation of the Systems ...................................................................... 135

7.2 Validation Procedure ..................................................................................... 136

7.2.1 Definition of a Test Protocol ................................................................ 136

7.2.2 Data Acquisition. Measures.................................................................. 137

7.2.3 Elements of the Measure Chain ............................................................ 138

7.2.4 Tests and Measurements....................................................................... 139

7.2.5 Instrumentation of Vehicle ................................................................... 139

7.2.6 Definition of Tests ................................................................................ 141

7.2.7 Circuit Test ........................................................................................... 141

7.2.8 Handling of Data................................................................................... 142

7.2.9 Analysis of the Results ......................................................................... 144

8 Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research ................................... 157

8.1 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 157

8.1.1 Practical Use ......................................................................................... 158

8.1.2 Improvement on Overall Approach ...................................................... 158

8.2 Future Research ............................................................................................. 159

8.2.1 Optimal Control Methods ..................................................................... 159

8.2.2 Parallel Processing Computation .......................................................... 160

8.2.3 Using Different Vehicle and Tyre Models ........................................... 160

Appendix A.................................................................................................................. 162

Appendix B .................................................................................................................. 164

Appendix C.................................................................................................................. 166

References.................................................................................................................... 169

_________________________________________________________________________________ v

List of Figures

without steer, 1869) .......................................................................................................... 2

Figure 1.2: Two-Wheel Vehicle (Turri and Porro, Italia, 1875)....................................... 2

Figure 1.3: Production Three-Wheel Vehicle (1929 Morgan Super Sports Aero)........... 3

Figure 1.4: Production Four-Wheel Vehicle (1963 Austin Healey 3000 MKII).............. 4

Figure 1.5: Multiple-Wheel Ground Vehicle: The Train.................................................. 5

Figure 2.1: Literature Review Keyword Search Diagram. ............................................. 11

Figure 2.2: The Driver-Vehicle-Ground System [22]. ................................................... 13

Figure 2.3: Basic Structure of Vehicle System Dynamics.............................................. 14

Figure 3.1: Axis Systems after Guiggiani [20] ............................................................... 16

Figure 3.2: Sideslip Angle after Guiggiani [20]. ............................................................ 17

Figure 3.3: Walking Analogy to Tyre Slip Angle after Milliken [18]............................ 18

Figure 3.4: SAE Tyre Axis System after Gillespie [19]. ................................................ 19

Figure 3.5: Geometrical Configuration and Peripheral Speed in the Contact Zone. ...... 20

Figure 3.6: (a)Wheel Deformation in owing to Rolling Resistent (Ground Deformation

and Elastic Return); (b) Forces and Contact Pressure z in a Rolling Wheel. ................ 23

Figure 3.7 Generalized Forces Acting on the Vehicle.................................................... 26

Figure 3.8: Generalized Forces Acting on the Vehicle................................................... 29

Figure 3.9: Lateral Force versus Slip Angle. .................................................................. 32

Figure 3.10: Lateral Force versus Wheel Rounds in Transient Condition with Permanent

Value equal to 2.4 kN. .................................................................................................... 35

Figure 3.11: Front Lateral Force versus Slip Angle with Different Normal Load. ........ 37

Figure 3.12: Rear Lateral Force versus Slip Angle with Different Normal Load. ......... 37

Figure 4.1: Primary Elements in the Powertrain............................................................. 39

Figure 4.2: Schematization Elements in the Powertrain................................................. 39

Figure 4.3: Powertrain Components and Configurations Theoretical Model................. 40

Figure 4.4: Performance Characteristic of Test-Vehicle ................................................ 43

Figure 4.5: Dimensionless Performance Characteristic of Test-Vehicle........................ 43

Figure 4.6: Driveline Notations ...................................................................................... 45

Figure 4.7: Driveline Complex Model. (a) Transmission Engaged; (b) Transmission

Disengaged...................................................................................................................... 46

Figure 4.8: Equivalent System for a Driveline Model.................................................... 46

Figure 4.9: Description of Correcting Rod of Internal Combustion Engine. ................. 57

Figure 4.10: Maximum Acceleration as function of the Speed. ..................................... 60

Figure 4.11: Maximum Acceleration as function of the Speed in log scale and reverse.

........................................................................................................................................ 60

Figure 4.12: Function 1/a(u) and Search for the Optimum Speeds for Gear Shifting.... 61

Figure 4.13: Function 1/a(u) and Search for the Optimum Speeds for Gear Shifting; the

white area is the time to speed. ....................................................................................... 61

Figure 4.14: Function 1/ax(u) in log scale. ..................................................................... 62

Figure 4.15: Engine Speed versus Vehicle Speed. ......................................................... 62

Figure 4.16: Acceleration-time curve. ........................................................................... 63

_________________________________________________________________________________ vi

List of Figures________________________________________________________________________

Figure 4.18: Distance-time curve................................................................................... 64

Figure 4.19: Traction tyre curve. ................................................................................... 64

Figure 4.20: Traction Control curve. .............................................................................. 65

Figure 4.21: : Power-time curve. .................................................................................... 65

Figure 4.22: Torque-time curve. ..................................................................................... 66

Figure 4.23: Power versus Engine Velocity. .................................................................. 66

Figure 4.24: Torque versus Engine Velocity. ................................................................. 67

Figure 4.25: Throttle Opening Input............................................................................... 68

Figure 4.26: Test Vehicle, Renault Mgane Coup 16V 150 HP................................... 69

Figure 4.27: Acceleration-time curve. ............................................................................ 70

Figure 4.28: Velocity-time curve.................................................................................... 71

Figure 4.29: Displacement-time curve............................................................................ 71

Figure 4.30: Traction Control curve. .............................................................................. 72

Figure 4.31: Power-time curve. ...................................................................................... 72

Figure 4.32: Torque-time curve. ..................................................................................... 73

Figure 4.33: Reference Acceleration and Velocity of the Vehicle [25] ......................... 73

Figure 4.34: Reference Normal and Tangential Forces at Rear Tyre [25] ..................... 74

Figure 4.35: Reference Powers Transferred [25]............................................................ 74

Figure 5.1: Vehicle Model. ............................................................................................. 76

Figure 5.2: Kinematics Steering (slip angle null) ........................................................... 77

Figure 5.3: Definition of kinematics Quantities of the Vehicle...................................... 79

Figure 5.4: Lateral Components of Velocity at Front Tyres........................................... 80

Figure 5.5: Lateral Components of Velocity at Rear Tyres............................................ 80

Figure 5.6: Longitudinal Components of Velocity at Left Tyres. .................................. 81

Figure 5.7: Longitudinal Components of Velocity at Right Tyres ................................. 82

Figure 5.8: Relation between Slip Angles and Centre of Rotation Position................... 82

Figure 5.9: Trajectory of the Vehicle as regards to a Reference Coordinate System..... 85

Figure 5.10: Forces Acting on the Vehicle ..................................................................... 88

Figure 5.11: Reduction of Single Track Model. ............................................................ 90

Figure 5.12: Single Track Model.................................................................................... 92

Figure 5.13: Steering Angle-time curve. ........................................................................ 98

Figure 5.14: Yaw Rate-time curve.................................................................................. 98

Figure 5.15: Lateral Velocity-time curve. ...................................................................... 99

Figure 5.16: Lateral Force Front-time ............................................................................ 99

Figure 5.17: Lateral Force Rear-time curve.................................................................. 100

Figure 5.18: Slip Angle Front-time curve..................................................................... 100

Figure 5.19: Slip Angle rear-time curve. ...................................................................... 101

Figure 5.20: Lateral Acceleration-time curve............................................................... 103

Figure 5.21: Lateral Velocity-time curve. .................................................................... 103

Figure 5.22: Yaw Rate-time curve................................................................................ 104

Figure 5.23: Lateral Force Front-time curve. ............................................................... 104

Figure 5.24: Lateral Force Rear-time curve.................................................................. 105

Figure 5.25: Trajectory of the Vehicle.......................................................................... 105

Figure 5.26: Lateral Acceleration-time curve............................................................... 108

Figure 5.27: Lateral Velocity-time curve. .................................................................... 109

_________________________________________________________________________________ vii

List of Figures________________________________________________________________________

Figure 5.29: Lateral Force Front-time curve. ............................................................... 110

Figure 5.30: Lateral Force Rear-time curve.................................................................. 110

Figure 5.31: Trajectory of the Vehicle.......................................................................... 111

Figure 6.1: Complete Vehicle Model. .......................................................................... 115

Figure 6.2: Driver Behaviour Block ............................................................................. 116

Figure 6.3: Engine Model. ............................................................................................ 116

Figure 6.4: Subsystem Corresponding to the Engine Model. ....................................... 117

Figure 6.5: Throttle Variation Model. .......................................................................... 118

Figure 6.6: Subsystem corresponding to the Throttle Variation Model. ...................... 118

Figure 6.7: Torque Converter Model............................................................................ 120

Figure 6.8: Subsystem Corresponding to the Torque Converter Model....................... 120

Figure 6.9: Subsystem Corresponding to the Gear Selector Block .............................. 121

Figure 6.10: Vehicle Dynamics. ................................................................................... 122

Figure 6.11: Driveline Model. ...................................................................................... 123

Figure 6.12: Driveline Subsystem. ............................................................................... 123

Figure 6.13: Aerodynamic Block.................................................................................. 123

Figure 6.14: Rolling Torque Block............................................................................... 124

Figure 6.15: Grade Torque Block. ................................................................................ 124

Figure 6.16: Inertia Evaluation Block........................................................................... 124

Figure 6.17: Trigger Block. .......................................................................................... 125

Figure 6.18: Wheel Shaft Block 1 ................................................................................ 125

Figure 6.19: Wheel Shaft Block 2 ................................................................................ 125

Figure 6.20: Wheel Shaft Subsystem 1......................................................................... 125

Figure 6.21: Wheel Shaft Subsystem 2......................................................................... 126

Figure 6.22: Memory Block.......................................................................................... 126

Figure 6.23: FWD Lateral Model Block....................................................................... 126

Figure 6.24: FWD Lateral Model Subsystem Block .................................................... 127

Figure 6.25: Lateral Model y Subsystem Block ........................................................... 127

Figure 6.26: Lateral Model r Subsystem Block............................................................ 128

Figure 6.27: Lateral Acceleration Subsystem Block .................................................... 128

Figure 6.28: Trajectory Subsystem Block .................................................................... 128

Figure 6.29: Tyre Model............................................................................................... 129

Figure 6.30: Normal and Longitudinal Behaviour (Tyre Model)................................. 129

Figure 6.31: Normal and Longitudinal Behaviour Subsystem. .................................... 130

Figure 6.32: Normal rear Force Sub-Model (Tyre Model)........................................... 130

Figure 6.33: Normal front Force Sub-Model (Tyre Model). ........................................ 131

Figure 6.34: Longitudinal front Force Sub-Model (Tyre Model)................................. 131

Figure 6.35: Longitudinal rear Force sub-Model (Tyre Model)................................... 131

Figure 6.36: Lateral Behaviour (Tyre Model). ............................................................. 132

Figure 6.37: Lateral Front and Rear Forces subsystem (Tyre Model).......................... 132

Figure 6.38: Elements of the Vehicle Simulator........................................................... 133

Figure 6.39: VDS Simulator block ............................................................................... 134

Figure 7.1: Measure Chain............................................................................................ 138

Figure 7.2: Instrumentation of the Test Vehicle ........................................................... 140

Figure 7.3: Instrumentation of the Test Vehicle ........................................................... 140

_________________________________________________________________________________ viii

List of Figures________________________________________________________________________

Figure 7.4: Track used to Perform the Experimental Tests .......................................... 142

Figure 7.5: Experimental Test-Curve 3 Sim1, Simulated FWD................................... 145

Figure 7.6: Experimental Test-Curve 3 Sim2, Simulated FWD................................... 146

Figure 7.7: Experimental Test-Curve 7 Sim1, Simulated FWD................................... 146

Figure 7.8: Experimental Test-Curve 7 Sim2, Simulated FWD................................... 147

Figure 7.9: Experimental Test-Curve 7 Sim3, Simulated FWD................................... 147

Figure 7.10: Experimental Test-Curve 3 Sim1, Simulated RWD. ............................... 148

Figure 7.11: Experimental Test-Curve 3 Sim2, Simulated RWD. ............................... 149

Figure 7.12: Experimental Test-Curve 3 Sim2, Simulated RWD. ............................... 149

Figure 7.13: Experimental Test-Curve 3 Sim3, Simulated RWD. ............................... 150

Figure 7.14: Experimental Test-Curve 3 Sim4, Simulated RWD. ............................... 150

Figure 7.15: Experimental Test-Curve 3 Sim5, Simulated RWD. ............................... 151

Figure 7.16: Experimental Test-Curve 3 Sim6, Simulated RWD. ............................... 151

Figure 7.17: Experimental Test-Curve 3 Sim7, Simulated RWD. ............................... 152

Figure 7.18: Experimental Test-Curve 7 Sim1, Simulated RWD. ............................... 152

Figure 7.19: Experimental Test-Curve 7 Sim2, Simulated RWD. ............................... 153

Figure 7.20: Experimental Test-Curve 7 Sim3, Simulated RWD. ............................... 153

Figure 7.21: Experimental Test-Curve 7 Sim4, Simulated RWD. ............................... 154

Figure 7.22: Experimental Test-Curve 7 Sim5, Simulated RWD. ............................... 154

Figure 7.23: Experimental Test-Curve 7 Sim6, Simulated RWD. ............................... 155

Figure 7.24: Experimental Test-Curve 7 Sim7, Simulated RWD. ............................... 155

_________________________________________________________________________________ ix

List of Tables

Table 3.1: Distance assumed with variation of Steady-State Cornering Force. ............. 35

Table 5.1: Terminology used in Equation of Motion. .................................................... 97

Table 5.2: Degrees of Freedom Corresponding to each Lateral Model........................ 111

Table 5.3: Degrees of Freedom Corresponding to each Complete Model ................... 112

Table 6.1: Input of the Engine Model........................................................................... 117

Table 6.2: Output of the Engine Model. ....................................................................... 117

Table 6.3: Gear Change during Acceleration and Deceleration Manoeuvreing........... 118

Table 6.4: Input of the Throttle Variation Model ......................................................... 119

Table 6.5: Fcn-Function of the Throttle Variation Model ........................................... 119

Table 6.6: Output of the Throttle Variation Model ...................................................... 119

Table 6.7: Input of the Torque Converter Model.......................................................... 121

Table 6.8: S-Function of the Torque Converter Model ................................................ 121

Table 6.9: Output of the Torque Converter Model....................................................... 121

Table 7.1: Inputs and Outputs of the Validation Model ............................................... 141

_________________________________________________________________________________ x

List of Simbols________________________________________________________________________

List of Symbols

l1, l2 CG location m

l3 Vertical drawbar load location m

l Wheelbase of the vehicle m

t Track of the vehicle m

W Weight of vehicle N

g Gravitational acceleration m/s2

mv Mass of vehicle (W/g) Kg

Iz Yawing moment of inertia Kg m2

Rotation angle of the vehicle rad

XG Longitudinal displacement of the vehicle m

YG Lateral displacement of the vehicle m

(x0, y0, z0) Coordinate system ground axis

(x, y, z) Fixed coordinate system body axis

(i, j, k) Versors axis

(X, Y, Z) Resultant of totally forces acting on the vehicle N

(L, M, N) Resultant of totally moments acting on the vehicle N

ay Lateral acceleration m/s2

ax (=d2x/dt2) Longitudinal acceleration m/s2

Ay (=ay /g) Lateral Coefficient /

V Vehicle absolute velocity m/s

r Yawing velocity rad/s

u Longitudinal velocity (or Feed velocity) m/s

Steer angle front wheels rad

e External steering wheel rad

i Internal steering wheel rad

f, r Slip angles rad

Vehicle slip angle (or Sideslip angle) rad

C Cornering stiffness N/rad

_________________________________________________________________________________ xi

List of Simbols________________________________________________________________________

Jw,r Inertia rear wheels kg m2

Fxa Aerodynamic force acting in forward direction N

Fza Aerodynamic force acting in vertical direction N

Mya Aerodynamic Moment acting on pitch direction N

h1 Inertia-forces location m

h2 Aero-forces location m

x1 Characteristic front length m

x2 Characteristic rear length m

x (=U) Characteristic lengths m

Rr1 Rolling radius of the front wheels m

Rr2 Rolling radius of the rear wheels m

Rr Effective rolling radius m

Fx1 Rolling resistance at front tyre N

Fx2 Rolling resistance at rear tyre

N

Fy1 Lateral force at front tyre N

Fy2 Lateral force at rear tyre N

Fz1 Vertical load at the front axle N

Fz2 Vertical load at the rear axle N

Fxd Drawbar load in forward direction N

s

F z1 Vertical static load at the front axle N

Fsz2 Vertical static load at the rear axle N

Fzd Drawbar load in backward direction N

p Inflation of pressure bar

fi Experimental coefficient (depending tyre) /

f0 Experimental coefficient (depending tyre) /

K Experimental coefficient (depending tyre) /

fs Static friction coefficient /

fd Sliding friction coefficient /

fr Rolling resistance coefficient /

_________________________________________________________________________________ xii

List of Simbols________________________________________________________________________

Grade rad

i Slope /

Hf Longitudinal component of the chassis-reaction N

Vf Vertical component of the chassis-reaction N

d2f/dt2 Angular acceleration at the front wheels rad/s2

d2r/dt2 Angular acceleration at the rear wheels rad/s2

w Rotational velocity of the wheels rad/s

e Rotational engine speed rad/s

ne Rotational engine speed rpm

nemax Maximum value of the rotational engine speed rpm

nemin Minimum value of the rotational engine speed rpm

Pe Engine power kw

Te Engine torque Nm

Temax Maximum value of the engine torque Nm

Temin Minimum value of the engine torque Nm

Tl Load torque Nm

Pl Load power kw

Taero Aerodynamics torque Nm

Trolling Rolling Resistent torque Nm

Tslope Slope torque Nm

Throttle opening %

Ie Engine inertia kg m2

Iw Wheel inertia kg m2

J Moment of inertia kg m2

Ieq Equivalent inertia kg m2

Ichassis Chassis Inertia kg m2

Iwheel Wheel Inertia kg m2

Icgi Crank gear inertia kg m2

Ifw Flywheel inertia kg m2

c Transmission gear ratio /

_________________________________________________________________________________ xiii

List of Simbols________________________________________________________________________

c Efficiency of the gear box /

d Efficiency of the final drive /

Kinetic Energy of the vehicle J

mc Crank mass kg

mcr Connecting Rod Big End mass kg

Rc Crank radius m

ncyl Cylinder number /

_________________________________________________________________________________ xiv

Chapter 1

1 Introduction

This chapter illustrates the ground vehicle development which has traditionally been

motivated by the need to move people and cargo from one location to another, always

with the intent of having a human operator.

Since the inception of the wheel as a viable means of ground transportation, man has

been on a never-ending quest to optimize its use for the transport of people and cargo.

Vehicles of all shapes, sizes, and weights have been built to accomplish one task or

another. Although vastly different in design and intended application, we could classify

most ground vehicles in terms of a single design feature; the number of wheels. This

classification does not predicate advantages of one vehicle over another. However, it

does provide a metric against which the designer may estimate of a vehicles potential

performance characteristics and general capabilities. Therefore, it stands to reason that

the historical record should demonstrate mankinds quest to classify the dynamic

characteristics and performance advantages of vehicles with every conceivable number

of wheels. This is in fact the case. Simply by examining the design and use of ground

transportation throughout history, we can see both experimentation and refinement in

the design of everything from vehicles having no wheels (tracks or legs) to those

containing hundreds of wheels (trains). Figure 1.1 presents the best known single-wheel

_________________________________________________________________________________ 1

Introduction___________________________________________________________________________

vehicle, the unicycle. Although this would have been the only possible configuration at

the moment of the wheels inception, the design has never proven itself as an effective

means in the transportation of people and cargo.

However, it remains in mainstream society as a source of entertainment and amusement.

Likewise, we see in Figure 1.2 the common perception of the two-wheel vehicle, the

bicycle. This design, though inherently unstable, has found widespread use and

acceptance throughout the world.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 2

Introduction___________________________________________________________________________

Although the standard bicycle has met with great success in both human and engine-

powered transportation its overall utility as a workhorse remains a point of debate.

Millions of people all over the world rely on the standard bicycle as their primary mode

of transportation.

At this point, we could make a strong argument for the correlation between how many

wheels are on a vehicle and its relative usefulness to society. Indeed, we could continue

this pattern by examining some of the more successful three-wheel designs. Though not

as prevalent in number as bicycles and motorcycles, this design shows up in everything

from toy tricycles to commercially successful off and on-road vehicles. Figure 1.3

presents a very successful three-wheel car marketed by the Morgan motor company

during the late 1920s.

These types of vehicles are still highly acclaimed and sought after by both collectors

and driving enthusiasts. Naturally, they also tend to be much more stable than bicycles

and motorcycles, but problems still exist. In fact, it was the high-speed instability of the

three-wheel all-terrain vehicle that ultimately led to its demise [Johnson, 1991]. So if we

continue on the premise that more is better, we may consider several more steps in

ground vehicle design.

Nothing need be said concerning the success of the four-wheel vehicle; one of the finest

examples of which is presented in Figure 1.4. No other vehicle type has met with more

public enthusiasm than the standard automobile.

Figure 1.3: Production Three-Wheel Vehicle (1929 Morgan Super Sports Aero)

_________________________________________________________________________________ 3

Introduction___________________________________________________________________________

Four wheeled vehicles are used in public, private, and industrial transportation and have

become an icon of the American dream. Again we see ever-increasing numbers of

people and amounts of cargo being moved over the worlds roadways every year.

Compared to the success of the four-wheel vehicle class, the popular two-wheelers and

nearly forgotten three-wheelers are primitive in their capabilities.

Larger trucks designed specifically for cargo handling can have anywhere from 10 to 22

wheels. These examples effectively support the thesis that more wheels inherently lead

to more utility when considering the transportation of people and cargo.

Finally, if we take the utility to number of wheels correlation toward the limit, we find

one of the most influential vehicle types since the development of the wheel itself, the

train; see Figure 1.5. Largely responsible for United States expansion in the West, the

train represents to limit of the wheel-utility correlation.

Most of a trains volume is dedicated to cargo. Its efficiency in ground transport is

therefore undeniable. Even today when most Americans do not travel by train, it

remains at the forefront of industrial transportation.

We have made an argument supporting the idea that more wheels are better. In light of

this apparent correlation, one would assume that investigation of the two-wheel concept

would prove fruitless. However, what must be considered here is that the historical

development of ground vehicles has focused on efficiency in business, commerce, and

personal transportation.

Figure 1.4: Production Four-Wheel Vehicle (1963 Austin Healey 3000 MKII)

_________________________________________________________________________________ 4

Introduction___________________________________________________________________________

Further, designers of ground vehicles have in general worked under the assumption that

vehicle control would ultimately fall into the hands of a human pilot. If another metric

of utility is employed, we see much different results.

I will begin with a brief history of land based transportation vehicles from antiquity to

the present and proceed to a thorough discussion of modern motor vehicle dynamics.

Chapter 2 illustrates the motivation for studying the vehicle dynamics and so the

research objective, showing with all its complexity the undefined environment of the

topic. Following the same direction, Chapter 3 describes the axis system used

throughout this research, which is the standardized SAE vehicle axis system. This

section also explains the mechanism of pneumatic tyres, particularly the forces acting

between road and wheel. Then, the longitudinal and lateral vehicle dynamics models

will be presented into Chapter 4 and 5, respectively. The derivation of the three-degree-

of-freedom vehicle model will be described, referring particularly attention to the

dynamic behaviour of the system. In the following models which will be shown, the

transformation of equations of motion to the state space form did not perform because it

was not possible, owing the mathematical difficulty. The logic of the simulation

program in Matlab/Simulink environment and the structure of the script code are

provided in Chapter 6. Instead, in Chapter 7 some experimental tests required in order

_________________________________________________________________________________ 5

Introduction___________________________________________________________________________

some problems associated with this particular comparison between the reference, means

experimental tests and the mathematical model will be also discussed. Finally, the

conclusion of the research and recommendation on future research are provided in

Chapter 8. Appendixes contain the major Matlab m-files used to perform the

simulations.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 6

Chapter 2

2 Vehicle Dynamics

This chapter describes a general overview of this research. Background information

related to the topic of vehicle dynamics and modelling along with research objectives

are introduced. Related literature is reviewed in this section, linking relevant topics to

the research presented here. Finally, an outline of the thesis and a brief description on

the contents of each chapter are also presented.

Research in vehicle dynamics has been an on-going study for decades, ever since the

invention of automobiles. Engineers and researchers have been trying to fully

understand the dynamic behaviour of vehicles as they are subjected to different driving

conditions, both moderate daily driving and extreme emergency manoeuvres. They

want to apply this finding to improve issues such as ride quality and vehicle handling

stability, and develop innovative design that will improve vehicle operations. With the

aid of fast computers to perform complicated design simulations and high speed

electronics that can be used as controllers, new and innovative concepts have been

tested and implemented into vehicles [1]. This type of research is mainly conducted by

automotive companies, tyre manufacturers, and academic institutions.

Automotive companies are constantly improving on their chassis design and

development by re-engineering their suspension systems through new technology. For

_________________________________________________________________________________ 7

Vehicle Dynamics______________________________________________________________________

example, the recent developments of traction control systems show that a marriage of

vehicle dynamics and electronics can improve handling quality of vehicle [1]. Examples

of such systems are anti-lock braking systems (ABS) and automatic traction systems.

They use a sensor to measure the rotational speed of the wheels and a micro-controller

to determine, in real time, whether slipping of the tyre is present. This results in full

traction and braking under all road conditions, from dry asphalt to icy conditions [2].

Another example of the benefit of joining vehicle dynamics with electronics is in

controllable suspensions, such as those using semi-active damper [3]. Semi-active

dampers enable damping characteristics of the suspension system to be set by a

feedback controller in real-time, thus improving the ride quality of the vehicle on

different types of road conditions [3].

A more advanced concept that is currently under research and development by

automotive companies is an autonomous vehicle [4, 5, 6]. This concept will enable the

vehicle to get from one point to another without constant commands from the driver.

The idea is to relieve the burden of vehicle control and operation from the driver and

also to reduce the number of accidents associated with driver operating error.

Tyre manufacturers also perform a variety of research on vehicle dynamics. They are

interested in characterizing the performance of their tyres as function of the tyre

construction component [7, 8]. Their goal is to be able to predict or design tyres for any

type of applications efficiently, and to reduce the cost associated with prototyping and

testing. Their efforts require developing more accurate tyre models; specifically models

that can predict how changing the tyre compound affects the tyre performance. The use

of predictive models is particularly important in applications where the tyre

performance is crucial, such as in race cars. The functions of tyres are to support the

vertical load of the vehicle, to generate the forces and moments necessary to keep the

race car on the track, and to generate traction against the ground. Formula-One race cars

are the most highly advanced vehicles in the world, where millions of dollars are spent

on their research and development. The performance between different race vehicles are

relatively the same, about the same amount of horsepower, the same amount of braking

ability, and the same suspension systems. Most races, however, are decided by the tyres

each team puts on their car and the skills of the driver to push the car to the limits. Tyre

_________________________________________________________________________________ 8

Vehicle Dynamics______________________________________________________________________

manufacturers spent tremendous amount of money and time developing the best tyres

for different types of racing conditions. Still, it is often difficult for the racing teams to

select the tyre compound that is most suitable for a particular racetrack. As a result, tyre

manufacturers in conjunction with racing teams are developing a simulation tool to

predict the best tyres for a particular racing condition [9].

Universities and research institutions are interested in vehicle dynamics for the same

reasons as mentioned above. Most of their projects are often funded by the automotive

industry. Another financial contributor may be the government agencies where their

interest is preserving the road surface due to different driving conditions. In this way, it

may be possible to reduce the road damage caused by heavy trucks. The latter is a major

concern in trying to keep the cost of infrastructure maintenance to a minimum [10].

Currently track testing is conducted by using test drivers to perform repetitive

manoeuvres on the track; specifically to characterize the handling, ride, and other

vehicle related performance of the vehicle. The objective of the test may be to do

performance comparison between old and new designs of shock absorbers, suspension

geometries, or tyres. Unfortunately, all these track tests are expensive and it is required

so much time to equip the test vehicle. Having a simulation model these processes could

be avoided, the simulation results could be equivalent with real tests.

In fact, the simulators are much utilized in all industrial fields such as aero spatial,

aeronautic, motor and many others. Their principal goal is to understand, whether to

expect the physical behaviour of the system. In many applications it is necessary to

understand the phenomena which come from the external working conditions, because

it would be too much dangerous, such as the landing/takeoff and vehicle collisions.

Other applications have only an educational purpose such as the flight simulators.

Sometimes, there is no other way to study the phenomenon, understood as the behaviour

of a system, owing to the dynamic develops. For example, this happens while one

studies the evolution of the universe. Also a lot of simulators are used to predict the

behaviour of a system, such as the meteorological and seismic ones.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 9

Vehicle Dynamics______________________________________________________________________

The objective of this research is to evaluate the mean characteristics of the vehicle

dynamics. Specifically a complete vehicle model, without vertical dynamics

investigation, will be evaluated, considering the tyre behaviour. A mathematical model

according to a physical system will be developed, under Matlab/Simulink environment.

Particular attention will be placed about the tyre forces, in order to investigate on the

mean phenomena which lead into critical conditions.

The philosophy of the simulation work is always to use simple models, it means with

few degrees of freedom models, in order to understand more aspects possible about the

physical system. This study, which uses a relatively simple vehicle and tyre model, is

intended as a preliminary study of an undefined field, such as vehicle dynamics. More

complete studies could be included in the future.

At the beginning of this research, an extensive literature search in the area of vehicle

dynamics and optimal control of vehicle was conducted. The database CiteSeer.IST

(Scientific Literature Digital Library), a leading source of engineering research, science,

and electronics articles, the database has an index of articles from nearly 700,000

documents. Moreover, a database of conference publications was used to complete the

search.

Keyword search was referenced on the following terms; modelling, vehicle, vehicle

dynamics, longitudinal, lateral, tyre, vehicle, and behaviour. Figure 2.1 shows the

results of the literature search.

The following sections, divided into optimal paths, vehicle, and tyre modelling sections,

briefly describe the papers that were found most relevant and complimentary to this

research.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 10

Vehicle Dynamics______________________________________________________________________

Modelling

(More than

10000)

Vehicle Dynamic

(1446) (5298)

Vehicle

Longitudinal Dynamics Lateral

Behaviour (11) (50) (571) Behaviour

(0)* (14)

(4) (31) (20) Path

(50)

(0)* (19) (53) Tyre

(5)

(3) (2) (6)

(* Irrelevant topic)

The research by of Hatwal, et al. [11] generated the time histories of steer angle,

traction, and braking forces required to track a desired trajectory, for a lane-change

manoeuvre.

Hatwal, et al. also made a comparison of different handling performances between a

front wheel drive (FWD) vehicle and a rear wheel drive (RWD) vehicle using a five-

degree-of freedom model for the vehicle. The system control variables were steer angle

of the front wheel, longitudinal force of the front wheel for FWD vehicle, and

longitudinal force of the rear wheel for RWD vehicle. Hatwal, et al. used optimal

control approach to determine the system control vectors with an objective of

minimizing time. They first assumed a free final time optimal control formulation, and

concluded that it was complex. Next, they used a fixed final time formulation by

deriving the differential equations with respect to forward distance using the

relationship between distance, velocity, and time. They noticed that the fixed final time

formulation reduces the number of equations needed to be solved. They used a penalty

cost function and the weighting factors tuning approach to find the desired trajectory.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 11

Vehicle Dynamics______________________________________________________________________

They concluded that FWD and RWD require similar steering angle input and

longitudinal force input during low speed lane-change manoeuvre. At higher speeds,

however, they concluded that there was a significant difference in trajectory between

the two types of vehicle.

Another study by Hendrikx, et al. [12] was to determine a time optimal inverse model of

a vehicle handling situation. They were interested in the driver actions, time histories of

the steering rate and the longitudinal force at the road/tyre contact. This optimal control

problem was calculated using the Gradient Method [13]. The vehicle was modeled as a

two-dimensional four-wheel model where the tyre model was nonlinear.

Their objective was to determine the vehicle trajectory for a lane-change manoeuvre,

with minimum time. A parametric study comparing the optimal trajectories between

FWD and RWD vehicles was also performed. As a result, they concluded that optimal

control could be applied to optimize car handling for a specific lane-change manoeuvre

by means of inverse vehicle model simulation, and FWD and RWD vehicles required

different driving strategies.

Smith, et al. [14] performed a study on modelling accuracy between different vehicle

models and tyre models. Specifically, they compared three models; the first was a

bicycle model with yaw and side-slip degrees of freedom using a linear tyre model. The

second model was a five-degree-of-freedom model with additional longitudinal and

wheel rotational degrees of freedom, using a nonlinear tyre model. The third was an

eight degree-of-freedom model, with additional roll and wheel rotational degrees of

freedom for the other two tyres using a nonlinear tyre model. The equations of motion

were integrated using the Runge-Kutta method. The results shown in their paper

indicated variations in accuracy between these models. They suggested that the bicycle

vehicle model could not be used accurately in the high lateral acceleration manoeuvres

due to the lack of lateral load transfer and body roll dynamics. With these results, they

concluded that the tyre lag information must be included in a lateral controller for high

speed manoeuvres, in order to accurately predict the desired and safe trajectory.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 12

Vehicle Dynamics______________________________________________________________________

Maalej et al. [7], performed a study on various types of tyre models which were used to

characterize the effects of slip ratio and slip angle on lateral force. They investigated

four different models, Dugoff, Segel, Paceijka, and proposed polynomial, comparing the

accuracy and the computational time between them. For the comparison, they

investigated the lateral force, longitudinal force, alignment moment, and combined

braking and steering performance of each model. They found that each model had its

own advantages and disadvantages, Paceijka scored highest in the accuracy category

while Segel scored the highest in the computational time category.

In general, the characteristics of a ground vehicle may be described in terms its

performance, handling, and ride. Performance characteristics refer to ability of the

vehicle to accelerate, to develop drawbar pull, to overcome obstacles, and to decelerate.

Handling qualities are concerned with the response of the vehicle to the drivers

command and its ability to stabilize the external disturbances. Ride characteristics are

related to the vibrations of the vehicle excited by the surface irregularities and its effects

on the passengers. The theory of the ground vehicles is concerned with the study of the

performance, handling, and ride and their relationships with the design of the ground

vehicles under various operating conditions

The behaviour of the ground vehicles represents the results of the interactions among

the driver, the vehicle, the environment, as illustrated in Figure 2.2 [22].

Ground Conditions

Acc., Brake

Performance

DRIVER

Steering System

VEHICLE Handling

Visual and

Other Inputs Surface Ride

Irregularities

Aerodynamic Inputs

_________________________________________________________________________________ 13

Vehicle Dynamics______________________________________________________________________

An understanding of the behaviour of the driver, the characteristics of the vehicle, and

the physical and geometric properties of the ground is, therefore, essential to the design

and evaluation of the ground vehicle systems.

According to this configuration, the vehicle dynamics can be introduced. The latter can

be subdivided into longitudinal, lateral and vertical one, Figure 2.3 [15, 16]. Obviously,

these subsystems are not independent of each other but mutually interconnected.

While vertical dynamics are experienced by the driver in a more or less passive manner,

horizontal dynamics comprising longitudinal and lateral dynamics are actively

controlled by the human driver.

Numerous approaches to dynamics vehicle modelling are documented in the literature.

Two simple ones are adopted here to describe longitudinal and lateral Behaviour, as in

the following chapters will be presented.

DISTURBANCES

Vehicle Non-linearity,

Alternating Friction Conditions Aerodynamic Forces Road Unevenness

Brake

Pedal Forces Longitudinal

Dynamics Longitudinal Acceleration

Acceler. Vertical

Pedal Position (Longitudinal and Deceleration Dynamics

and Gear Shift

Motions and

Wheel

D

R Wheel Loads

(Vertical

Vehicle Cornering

I Speed Resistence oscillations,

V Wheel Motions,

E Pitching and

R Rolling)

Lateral

Steering Wheel

Dynamics

Angle Lateral Acceleration

(Lateral, Yawing,

and Steering

Motions)

1 For the meaning of few variables mentioned to see 4th and 5th chapters.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 14

Chapter 3

This chapter provides information on dynamics modelling of the vehicle. The vehicle

axis system used throughout the simulation is according to the SAE standard, as

described in SAE J670e [17]. As well a research study of typical forces acting at wheels

of each vehicle will be used in this research in order to construct a complete vehicle

model.

At any given instant of time, a vehicle is subjected to a single force acting at some

location and in some direction. This so-called external or applied force maintains the

velocity or causes an acceleration of the vehicle. This force is made up of tyre,

aerodynamic, and gravitational components. These different components are governed

by different physical laws ant it is not convenient to deal with this single force.

Furthermore, these various components act at different locations and in different

directions relative to the vehicle chassis.

In order to study the vehicle performance it is necessary to define axis systems to which

all the variables, such as the acceleration, velocity and many other can be referred.

Throughout this thesis, the axis systems used in vehicle dynamics modelling will be

according to SAE J670e [17]. These two axis systems are used as required for the

_________________________________________________________________________________ 15

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

complete representation of the system. Both are described in the following sections, as

shown in Figure 3.1.

The coordinate system is fixed to the ground and the letters (x0, y0, z0; O0), are used to

denote the three principal directions, namely Ground Axis2; x0 and y0 are in the

horizontal plane (the former orthogonal to the sheet), z0 is vertical upward; see Figure

3.1 (a).

On the analogy of ground-axis, an axis system (x, y, z; G) behind the vehicle, so called

Body Axis, can be fixed. Its origin is situated in the centre of gravity of the vehicle,

and the directions are characterized with the versors (i, j, k). As shown in Figure 3.1 (b),

x-axis is defined parallel to road and forward direct, z-axis is orthogonal to the road and

y-axis is perpendicular to ones and left direct. The x-axis points to the forward direction

or the longitudinal direction, and the y-axis, which represents the lateral direction, is

positive when it points to the right of the driver. The z-axis points to the ground

satisfying the right hand rule. In most studies related to handling and directional control,

only the x-y plane of the vehicle is considered. The vertical axis, z, is often used in the

study of ride, pitch, and roll stability type problems.

(a) (b)

Figure 3.1: Axis Systems after Guiggiani [20]

2 This reference can be considered an inertial system because the earthly rotation is irrelevant as regard

to the vehicle one.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 16

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

The following list defines relevant definitions for the variables associated with this

research:

Longitudinal direction: forward moving direction of the vehicle. There are two different

ways of looking at the forward direction, one with respect to the vehicle body itself, and

another with respect to a fixed reference point. The former is often used when dealing

with acceleration and velocity of the vehicle. The latter is used when the location

information of the vehicle with respect to a starting or an ending point is desired.

Lateral direction: sideways moving direction of the vehicle. Again, there are two ways

of looking at the lateral direction, with respect to the vehicle and with respect to a fixed

reference point. Researchers often find this direction more interesting than the

longitudinal one since extreme values of lateral acceleration or lateral velocity can

decrease vehicle stability and controllability.

Sideslip angle: is the angle between the x-axis and the velocity vector that represents the

instantaneous vehicle velocity at that point along the path, as shown in Figure 3.2. It

should be emphasized that this is different from the slip angle associated with tyres.

Even though the concept is the same, each individual tyre may have a different slip

angle at the same instant in time. Often the body slip angle is calculated as the ratio of

lateral velocity to longitudinal velocity.

Tyre slip angle: This is equivalent to heading in a given direction but walking at an

angle to that direction by displacing each foot laterally as it is put on the ground as

shown in Figure 3.3. The foot is displaced laterally due to the presence of lateral forces.

Figure 3.4 shows the standard tyre axis system that is commonly used in tyre modelling.

It shows the forces and moments applied to the tyre and other important parameters

such as slip angle, sideslip angle, and others.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 17

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

Figure 3.3: Walking Analogy to Tyre Slip Angle after Milliken [18].

In order to simplify the vehicle model so that results of the integration can be quickly

calculated, the effects of camber angle are not included in this study.

The wheels of all modern motor vehicles are provided with pneumatic tyres, which

support the vehicle and transfer the driving power (power tractive) through the wheel-

ground contact. Therefore in all modern vehicles all the disturbance forces which are

applied to the vehicle, with the exception of aerodynamic force, are generated in the

same contact surface.

This interaction determines how the vehicle turns, brakes and accelerates. As our

purpose is to understand the principal aspects of the vehicle dynamics, the tyre

behaviour is an essential part of this work, and in the following section its

characteristics will be explained.

In the study of the behaviour of the wheel, it is essential to evaluate the forces and the

moments acting on it. Consequently, to describe its characteristics, it is necessary to

define an axis system that serves as a reference for the definition of various parameters.

Again, one of the common axis systems used in the vehicle dynamics work has been

defined recommended by the Society of Automotive Engineers is shown in Figure 3.4

_________________________________________________________________________________ 18

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

[17, 18]. The origin of the axis system is in the centre of the tyre contact and the x-axis

is the intersection of the wheel plane and the ground plane with positive direction

forward. The z-axis is perpendicular to the ground plane with a positive. Consequently,

the Y-axis is in the ground, and its direction is chosen to make the system axis

orthogonal and right hand.

Assuming all the forces to be located at the centre of contact area, we can individuate

three forces and three moments acting on the tyre from the ground. Tractive force (or

longitudinal force) Fx is the component in the x direction of the resultant force exerted

on the tyre by the road. Lateral force Fy is the component in the y direction, and normal

force Fz is the component in the z direction. Similarly, the moment Mx is the moment

about the X axis exerted from the road to the tyre. The rolling resistent moment My is

the moment about the Y axis, and the aligning torque Mz is the moment about the z-axis.

The moment applied to the tyre from the vehicle, exactly by powertrain, about the spin

axis is referred to as wheel torque Tw.

There are two important angles associated with a rolling tyre: the slip angle and the

camber angle. Slip angle is the angle formed between the direction of the velocity of

the centre of the tyre and the plane x-z. Moreover, the camber angle is the angle

formed between the x-z plane and the wheel plane. How the lateral force will be shown

at the tyre-ground contact patch is a function of the slip angle and the camber angle

[22].

_________________________________________________________________________________ 19

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

Consider a wheel rolling on a level road with no braking or tractive moment applied to

it, with its plane perpendicular to the road. Therefore, remembering the known

relationship between the angular velocity of a rigid wheel and the forward speed as

being u=R, for a tyre an effective rolling radius Rr can be defined as the ratio between

the same velocity but referring to the wheel:

u = w Rr ( 3.1)

where Rr is the effective rolling radius and w the velocity of the wheel. See references

[22, 23].

This relationship comes from an important assumption, called Low of Coulomb. In

accordance to this relation (called rolling without drifting), no drift between the two

parts is assumed. The behaviour of the tyre comes from this assumption and being a

point of contact3. For this reason, as shown in Figure 3.5 the centre of instantaneous

rotation R is not coincident with the centre of contact A.

Figure 3.5: Geometrical Configuration and Peripheral Speed in the Contact Zone.

3 Actually, when two surfaces make contact, the local deformation is never about a point but there is

always a degeneration into a surface owing to Hertzs Deformation.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 20

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

The peripheral velocity of any point varies periodically in according with the angular

variation of the wheel. Analyzing the strain around the point of contact A and knowing

the direct correlation between the radius and the linear velocity, it is possible to note the

corresponding smaller radius, in owing of the compression and consequently the

velocity decreases. In the opposite way, on the right and the left of the same point the

velocity remains meanly constant.

As a consequence of this mechanism, the spin speed of the wheel with the pneumatic

tyre is smaller than a rigid wheel with the same load. On account of the strain, this

relationship is available:

Rl < Rr < R ( 3.2)

The effective rolling radius depends on many factors, some of which are determined by

the tyre structure and others by the working conditions such as inflation pressure, load,

speed, and others [22, 23].

In the following work, an estimation of the resistent rolling radius will be made, in

accordance with the geometrical values assumed for the test vehicle.

Consider a wheel rolling freely on a flat surface. If both the wheel and the road were

perfectly undeformable, there would be no resistance and consequently no need to exert

a tractive force. In the real world, as shown in the former section, perfectly rigid bodies

do not exist and both the road and the wheel are subject to deformation with the contact

surface.

During the motion of the system, how in all mechanical real system subject to strains,

the material behaviour is never perfectly elastic, but it includes at least a small plastic

strain in owing to the hysteresis of material and other phenomena. For this reason to

every turn of the wheel in according with this macroscopic deformation it is necessary

to spend some energy. This energy dissipation is what causes rolling resistent.

Obviously it increases with the tyre deformation, stiffness of the tyre and many others

parameters.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 21

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

Other mechanisms, like small sliding between road and wheel and aerodynamic drag are

responsible for a small contribution to the overall resistent, of the order of a small

percentage.

The distribution of the contact pressure, which at standstill was symmetrical with

respect to the centre of contact zone, becomes unsymmetrical when the wheel is rolling

and the resultant Fz moves forward producing a torque My=-Fzx with respect to the

rotation axis.

Rolling resistance is defined by the mentioned SAE document J670e as the force which

must be applied to the centre of the wheel with a line of action parallel to the x-axis so

that its moment about a line through the centre of tyre contact and parallel to the spin

axis of the wheel will balance the moment of the tyre contact force about this line.

Consider a free rolling wheel on level road with its mean plane coinciding with x-z

plane (=0, with camber angle), as shown in Figure 3.6.

Assuming that no traction or braking moment other than Mf due to aerodynamic drag is

applied to the wheel, the equilibrium equation about the centre of the wheel in steady

state rolling, solved in the rolling resistance Fx, is

Fz x + M f

Fx = ( 3.3)

Rl

where it must be noted that both rolling resistance, Fx, and drag moment Mf are

negative. Equation (3.3) is of limited practical use, as x and Mf are not easily

determined.

For the practical purposes, rolling resistance is usually expressed as

Fx = f r Fz ( 3.4)

latter depends on many parameters, as the traveling speed (or longitudinal linear

velocity of the wheel), the inflation of pressure p, the normal force Fz, the size of the

_________________________________________________________________________________ 22

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

Figure 3.6: (a)Wheel Deformation in owing to Rolling Resistent (Ground Deformation and Elastic

Return); (b) Forces and Contact Pressure z in a Rolling Wheel.

tyre, the working temperature, the road conditions and finally, the forces Fx and Fy

exerted by the wheel4.

The most important effect on the rolling resistance coefficient is the longitudinal

velocity of the centre of the wheel5. Generally, this coefficient increases with the

velocity of the vehicle, at the beginning very slowly and then at an increased rate.

This functional dependence can be approximated with a polynomial of the type

n

f r = fiu i ( 3.5)

i =0

Where ui is the longitudinal velocity of the vehicle with i which denotes the degree of

the polynomial used and fi a coefficient valuated by experimental tests.

Generally a polynomial with second order is preferred. In this work the latter

approximation will be used.

f r = f 0 + Ku 2 ( 3.6)

4 The complex relationships between the design and operational parameters of the tyre and its rolling

resistance make it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to develop an analytic method for predicting the

rolling resistent. To provide a uniform basis for collecting experimental data, the Society of Automotive

Engineers recommends rolling resistent measurement procedures for various types on different surfaces,

which may be found in SAE Handbook.

5 For a vehicle seen as a single rigid body and in presence of rigid driveline the velocity of the centre of

the wheel (or peripheral one)can be approximated with the velocity of the vehicle.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 23

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

Particularly the values of f0 and K must be measured on any particular tyre. The values

assumed by these coefficients will have chosen according with Reference [22]; for more

details see [23, 24] too.

According with Coulomb Hypothesis, before illustrated, the contact between the wheel

and the ground is without drift if this relationship is satisfied:

Fx f s Fz ( 3.7)

where Fx and Fz are the component of tangential and normal force transferred in the

contact point respectively; as well fs represents the static friction coefficient which

depends on the surfaces of materials.

Moreover, if the former relationship (3.7) is not satisfied between both surfaces the drift

will have produced. During this critical condition, it is available in the following one

F x = f d Fz ( 3.8)

where fd represents the sliding friction coefficient which depends on the surfaces of the

materials.

Therefore it is introduced an important parameter, longitudinal feed U which is able to

describe the imperfect elasticity through the bodies

x1 = U = f r Rr ( 3.9)

This kind working hypothesis is able to investigate with a good approximation the

principal aspects of the dynamics behaviour of the tyre, for all its simplicity.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 24

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

Not taking into account a level road (banked surfaces) but a slope surface, an additional

contribution will be presented. In fact, the road grade will contribute directly to the

braking effort, either in a positive sense (uphill) or negative (downhill).

Grade is defined as the ratio of the vertical distance to the horizontal one. The additional

force on the vehicle arising from the slope, Fs, is given by:

Fs = Wx = W sin ( 3.10)

cos = 1

( 3.11)

sin = tan = i

means the acceleration of gravity) [19].

Determining the axle loadings on a vehicle under general conditions can be performed

through the Newtons Second Law. It is an important step in analysis of the dynamic

behaviour of the vehicle because the axle loads determine the tractive effort obtainable

at each axle, affecting the acceleration, gradeability, maximum speed, and many other

factors. The major external forces acting on a two-axle vehicle are shown in Figure 3.7.

References [22, 23, 24, 25].

In the longitudinal direction, the typical forces acting on the vehicle are caused by

different nature. For this reason, most of these forces do not act at the centre of gravity

of the vehicle, and thus create moments.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 25

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

Referring to the same figure, the forces can be justified in the following manner:

W: weight of the vehicle acting at its centre of gravity, G, with a magnitude equal to its

mass times the acceleration of gravity. On a grade it may have two components, a

longitudinal component which is proportional to the sine of the slope and parallel to

the road, and a vertical component which is proportional to the cosine of the slope and

perpendicular to the road surface;

mv: mass of the vehicle;

Jw,f and Jw,r: Inertia of the front and rear wheels;

d2x/dt2: linear acceleration of the vehicle along the longitudinal axis;

d2f/dt2 and d2r/dt2: angular accelerations of the vehicle along the spin z-axis at the

front and rear wheels; Formally, they are equal and fixed to d2x/dt2 times Rr;

l: wheelbase of the vehicle, that means the length between the two spin axles;

l1 and l2: centre of gravity location, referring to both axles;

l3: distance between the vertical drawbar load and rear axle;

Fxa, Fza and Mya: Aerodynamic forces acting on the body of the vehicle. ; the former, in

x direction, may be represented as acting at a point above the ground indicated by the

height, h2, or by a longitudinal force of the same magnitude in the ground plane with

an associate moment equivalent to Fxa times h2; Instead Mya represent the

aerodynamic pitching moment;

_________________________________________________________________________________ 26

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

h1 and h2: lengths between the line of action of the inertia force and the aerodynamic

one, respectively;

x1 and x2: characteristic lengths between the line of action of the inertia force and the

aerodynamic one, respectively;

Rr1 and Rr2: Rolling radius of the front and rear wheels, respectively. However, their

magnitude is always equal and so, it is fixed as Rr;

Fx1, Fx2: Rolling resistance of the front and rear tyres;

Fz1, Fz2: Vertical load of the vehicle at the front and rear tyres;

Fxd, Fzd: Drawbar loads. Exactly, they are the longitudinal and vertical forces acting at

hitch point when the vehicle is towing a trailer;

To valuate the normal components of the contact ground-tyre at both axis of the vehicle

two equations of dynamics equilibrium are required. Always referring to the same

figure, taking into account that at each axle there are two wheels, an rotational

equilibrium about the point P and a global one in forward direction have been made:

xh1 + 2Jw, f &&w, f + 2Jw,r&&w,r 2Fz 2 ( l x1 +x2 ) + Fzd ( l + l3 +x1 ) + Fxd h1 + Fxah2 +

mv &&

( 3.12)

Fza ( l1 +x1 ) Mya +Wxh1 +Wz ( l1 +x1 ) = 0

Where, for simplicity it is assumed null the contribution of the aerodynamic forces Fza

and Mya, different from the x-direction:

Fza = 0

( 3.13)

M ya = 0

Analogy for the both drawbar forces, that is the vehicle is running without trailer (Fxd=

Fxd=0); Therefore, it is assume that the inertia of the wheels have the same magnitude,

like as the characteristic lengths:

J w, f = J w, r = J w

( 3.14)

x1 = x2 = U

_________________________________________________________________________________ 27

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

Finally, like working hypothesis the elementary rotation of the wheels at the same axle

assumes equal values:

w, f = w, r = w ( 3.15)

mv && ( 3.16)

where Wx and Wz represent the both components of the vehicle weight that, supposing

the vehicle moving on roads with small slope we have:

Wx = W sin = mv gi

( 3.17)

Wz = W cos = mv g

Finally, the equation which is able to provide the rear load transfer on the tyre is:

1

Fz 2 = xh1 + 4 J w&&w + Fxa h2 + mv gh1i + mv g ( l1 + U )

mv &&

2l

( 3.18)

the front load6 transfer:

2 Fz 2 + 2 Fz1 Fzd + Fza Wz = 0 ( 3.19)

where, for the same considerations about the drawbar and aerodynamic forces:

mv g 2 Fz 2

Fz1 = ( 3.20)

2

6 The same expression for the front load transfer could be obtained performing the same rotational

equilibrium about the point of contact ground-tyre at the rear wheel. Evidently, it would be more

industrious, mathematically.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 28

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

To note how the front and rear vertical loads are constituted by two parts, first Static

Load and Dynamic Load. In fact, examining the Equations (3.16) and (3.18), they

can be written as:

1

Fz1 = Fzs1 xh1 + 4 J w&&w + Fxa h2 + mv gh1i + mv gU

mv &&

2l

( 3.21)

1

Fz 2 = Fzs2 + mv &&xh1 + 4 J w&&w + Fxa h2 + mv gh1i + mv gU

2l

where the terms Fsz1 and Fsz2 represents the front and rear static loads transfer,

respectively; expressly they assume the following form7:

l2

Fzs1 = mv g

2l

( 3.22)

l

Fzs2 = mv g 1

2l

Instead, to valuate the longitudinal components of the contact forces another two

dynamic equation of equilibrium are required. First, taking care a single axle, and

rearranging all the forces acting at its we have the Figure 3.8.

7 To note that in many books concerning the Vehicle Dynamics, the static load is characterized by a

proportionality respect to the semi-wheelbase, but the latter is reported only on the wheelbase total. The

reason why the static load transfer is referred to the double wheelbase is corresponding to have

considered on the same axle both wheels.

Exactly, if the variation of the rolling resistance is considered invariant with the velocity, in the load

transfer could be added this latter term.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 29

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

Performing an equilibrium about the spin axle of the front wheel, the relation assumes

the following form:

J w&&w + Fz1U + Fx1 Rr = 0 ( 3.23)

J w&&w + Fz1U

Fx1 = ( 3.24)

Rr

Consequently, the global equilibrium at the vehicle in forward direction gives the

following relation:

x 2 Fx1 2 Fx 2 + Fxa Fxd + Wx = 0

mv && ( 3.25)

But, with the same observations made for the former equations, we obtain:

1

Fx 2 = ( mv &&x + mv gi + Fxa ) + Fx1 ( 3.26)

2

where Hf and Vf are the horizontal and vertical components of the reactions exerted on

the chassis by the tyre.

Finally, since the principal purpose of the model is to investigate the response of the

dynamic behaviour of the vehicle with the interaction of the powertrain, the Equations

from (3.16) to (3.22) need to be rearranged in respect of the angular engine velocity,

variable obtained from the longitudinal model. To do this it required recalling various

terms which are compared in these equations. Simplifying into the following sentences,

they can be reported.

2

u = x& = e Rr c d

2 2 2 2

c d

c d

x = & e Rr

ax = && ( 3.27)

c d

x

&&

&&w = = & e c d

Rr c d

proportional to its. Therefore, the final equation which describes the tyre behaviour is:

_________________________________________________________________________________ 30

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

1 1

2

2 2

Fz2 = SCxh2Rr e + ( mvh1Rr + 4Jw ) &e + mv g ( hi1 + l1 +U )

c d c d

2l 2

cd cd

1 1

2

Fz1 = SCxh2Rr 2 c d e2 + ( mvh1Rr + 4Jw ) c d &e + mv g ( hi 1 l2 +U ) ( 3.28)

2l 2

cd cd

1 1

2

2 2 l

Fx1 = SCxh2 Rr c d

e + mvh1Rr + + 2 2Jw

c d

&e + mv g ( hi1 l2 +U ) + 2lfr

2l 2

cd Rr cd

1 h l

2

l

Fx2 = 2 SCxRr 2 c d e2 + ( h1 l ) mv Rr + + 2 2Jw c d &e + mv g ( ( h1 l ) i l2 +U ) + 2lfr

2l 2 2

cd Rr cd

In order to analyze completely the dynamic behaviour of the vehicle, it is necessary to

define the tyre behaviour at each wheel in lateral direction too. In this way other two

relations, able to define the lateral behaviour of a tyre, will be found [20, 21]. From a

general point of view the lateral forces Fyij are a function of slip angle , camber angle ,

longitudinal force Fxij and load transfer Fzij. Formally, the former dependence is written:

Fy = Yp ( , , Fx , Fz ) ( 3.29)

where, Yp represents the characteristic function of the tyre. However, the influence of

the longitudinal force and the camber angle are neglected, and thus, depending on the

variability of the lateral force Fyij by the slip angle and load transfer, we will have

different kinds of tyre model.

Taking into account only the functional variation about the slip angle we will formulate

the tyre model able to integrate the equation of motion, shown in Chapter 5. For this

elementary model, considering constant the vertical load, the following relation is

available:

Fy = Yp ( ) ( 3.30)

_________________________________________________________________________________ 31

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

In the following section we propose most simplified model, the linear tyre model. This

latter describes the lateral force as a linear function of the slip angle [20, 21]. This

functional link is expressed into the following relation:

Fyij = C ij ij ( 3.31)

where, being i1=i2=i, we have:

Fyi = Ci i ( 3.32)

Yp

C = C ( Fz ) = ( 3.33)

= 0; Fz = cost

From the dimensional point of view it represents a force per unit angle. For convention

is always positive. Generally, its magnitude for passenger vehicle is 105 N/rad and is

two or four times as the previous one for the formula 1 tyres. The working field is

characterized by small slip angle, which means the order of magnitude is equal to 1520

degrees on dry road. Figure 3.9 shows the front and rear lateral force in function of the

slip angle. Obviously, increasing the magnitude of the cornering stiffness, the

inclination of the line will increase too.

4.5

3.5

3

Lateral Force [kN]

2.5

1.5

0.5 Fy1

Fy2

0

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

Slip Angle [deg]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 32

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

To study the behaviour of the tyre during the transient condition, it cannot be utilized

the algebraic function, shown in the former section, but a differential equation is

required. From experimental tests it is appeared that the lateral force is an increasing

monotonic function which begins from zero and moves in asymptotic way to the

permanent condition. From a general point of view, once a slip angle in different to

zero, the instantaneous increasing of the lateral force is not possible [20, 21].

A simple mathematical model to describe the tyre behaviour during a transient

condition, can be described by the following differential equations:

d &

Fyi + Fyi = Yp ( ) ( 3.34)

u

where the length d is the relaxation length and the function Yp(), namely

characteristic function, represents the lateral force in function of the slip angle during

the steady-state condition.

It is a ordinary differential equation, non homogenous, first order, linear and with

constant coefficients8. The unknown variable of this equation is the lateral force as

function of time.

Making same considerations about the former relationship, it is possible to calculate

immediately the analytical solution:

Fyi ( t ) = F h yi + F p yi ( 3.35)

where, Fhyi and Fpyi are the particular integral and the homogenous associated solution

(with i which assumes the value 1 for the front wheel and 2 for the rear ones). They

assume the values, respectively

8 Strictly, this happens only if the longitudinal velocity does not change. However, as first approximation

its variability is neglected.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 33

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

u

F h yi ( t ) = A exp t

d ( 3.36)

F yi = Yp ( )

p

where, is the value assumed by the slip angle during the permanent conditions and A

is integration constant. To note the dependence of the particular from the slip angle (t).

In order to calculate the value of the constant it can be imposed the following condition:

Fyi ( 0 ) = 0 ( 3.37)

u

Fyi ( t ) = A exp t + Yp ( ) ( 3.38)

d

A = Yp ( ) ( 3.39)

u s

Fyi ( t ) = Yp ( ) 1 exp t = Yp ( ) 1 exp ( 3.40)

d d

where it is imposed s=ut, with s which indices the displacement covered of the wheel.

Obviously this function is an increasing monotonic function which begins from zero

and moves in asymptotic way up to the permanent condition .

The relaxation length can be obtained by some geometrical considerations, as shown in

Figure 3.10, considering the permanent value equal to 2.4 kN. Imposing s=d the relation

available is:

Fyi ( t ) = (1 exp ( 1) ) Yp ( ) = 0.6321 Yp ( ) ( 3.41)

_________________________________________________________________________________ 34

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

Therefore, the length d represents the wheel displacement required to obtain a lateral

force equal to 63 percent of the steady-state value.

Another method to obtain the relaxation length observing the following property:

dFy Yp ( )

= ( 3.42)

ds s =0

d

Normally, the magnitude of the relaxation length is about the rolling radius of the tyre.

Synthetically, the table 3.1 shows the cornering force influence (steady-state value) on

the relaxation length. To note its influence is very small, nearly insignificant.

2.5

1.5

Lateral Force [kN]

0.5

Fy

0.63 Yp

d

0

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

Rounds [/]

Figure 3.10: Lateral Force versus Wheel Rounds in Transient Condition with Permanent Value equal to

2.4 kN.

Fy( ) d

2.00 0.248

2.20 0.250

2.40 0.248

_________________________________________________________________________________ 35

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

To describe the tyre behaviour, it is possible to use some empirical formulas which may

not have any physical correlation with the effective behaviour of the tyre, such as the

Magic Formula [20, 21, 22, 24, 25] and other experimental tendency traduced into a

mathematical form. These empirical formulas come used to develop the mathematical

model in order to study the complete vehicle dynamics. From a general point of view

the tyre description could be just an approximation problem of an unknown analytical

function. But, anyway there will have further constraints to respect. First, the first

derivative may have some fluctuations that do not really exist. Real is the same as

saying that the second derivative will be constrained too. This aspect produces the

approximation more delicate. Another important aspect is to consider how many

parameters will have to take into account, which of these will have to be constant and

their physical meanings.

Still, the general trend is been to investigate some transcendental functions which are

depending on a finite number of parameters. The function taken into account is:

C

Fy ( , Fz ) = Fz 1 exp ( 3.43)

Fz

where represents the ratio between the normalized tyre friction and the lateral force.

Even if the lateral force depends on many factors, such as the road surface conditions,

the curves shown in Figure 3.11 and Figure 3.12 illustrate how the normal force

influences the shape of Fyi for the front and rear wheels.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 36

Vehicle Dynamics Modelling_____________________________________________________________

4.5

FZ1=1kN

4 FZ2=2kN

FZ3=3kN

FZ4=4kN

3.5

FZ5=5kN

3

Lateral Force [kN]

2.5

1.5

0.5

0

0 5 10 15

Slip Angle [deg]

Figure 3.11: Front Lateral Force versus Slip Angle with Different Normal Load.

4.5

FZ2=1kN

4 FZ2=2kN

FZ2=3kN

FZ2=4kN

3.5

FZ2=5kN

3

Lateral Force [kN]

2.5

1.5

0.5

0

0 5 10 15

Slip Angle [deg]

Figure 3.12: Rear Lateral Force versus Slip Angle with Different Normal Load.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 37

Chapter 4

Modelling an vehicle in all its parts requires good knowledge of the components

involved and their physics. The first step in the study of the longitudinal behaviour of

the vehicle is to create a mathematical model that must represent the physical system

with good approximation. This chapter describes the modelling of the dynamics

longitudinal. In the field of vehicle lateral dynamics field, the feed velocity is kept

constant in order to investigate the behaviour of the rest of the system. In this vehicle

model, the speed and torque variability have been added.

From a mechanical point of view, a vehicle can be mainly presented as a numerous set

of rotating and translating parts. Initially, to identify its dynamic behaviour we will

model the whole system, basically composed of the propulsion system called

powertrain and the set including the suspension, wheel and road links, called

chassis.

According to the aim to reach, vehicles can be modeled in many different ways. In fact,

in this work we are going to analyze the dynamic development of the vehicle speed

from a known throttle opening.

That is the reason why we will consider engine modelling only, and not driveline

modelling [19], as shown in Figure 4.1.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 38

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

Schematically, the powertrain system can be represented as in Figure 4.2. The system-

vehicle can be configured through a set of interconnected blocks; see Figure 4.3 for a

description of the different powertrain components [26, 27].

_________________________________________________________________________________ 39

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

The main parts of a vehicle powertrain are the engine, clutch transmission, torque

converter and shafts. This section covers the derivation of basic equations describing a

complete longitudinal model. The aim of modelling is to find the most important

physical effects explaining the oscillations in the measured engine speed, transmission

speed, and wheel speed. The model is the combination of rotating inertia connected with

damped shaft flexibilities, considered rigid.

A theoretical model of the drivetrain is introduced in form of a non linear Simulink

model of the first order. The parameter values are derived from the measurement data.

The model input is the throttle position of the driver; the model output is the engine

speed and wheel speed [24, 25, 26, 28].

Modelling the powertrain requires good knowledge of the components involved and

their physics. We will divide modelling into two parts: the engine model and the

driveline model, including a torque converter model. The models presented in the

literature are usually complex and therefore not suitable for the visualization the

principal aspects of vehicle dynamics owing to long simulation time. So, we will

construct some simpler models.

As mentioned previously, there are two limiting factors to the performance of a road

vehicle: one is the maximum traction effort that the tyre-ground contact can stand, and

the other is the traction effort that the engine torque with a given transmission can

provide. The smaller of these two will give the performance potential of the vehicle.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 40

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

In low gears with the engine throttle fully open, the traction stress may be limited by the

nature of the tyre-road grip. Instead, in higher gears, the traction effort is usually

determined by the engine and transmission characteristics. To predict the overall

performance of a vehicle, the engine and transmission characteristics must be taken into

consideration. In this section, the general characteristics of vehicle power and

transmissions will be presented.

As most road vehicles are powered by reciprocating internal combustion engines, their

characteristics will be summarized in the present section.

Apart from the action of the throttle control, the power supplied by the engine depends

mainly on the rotational speed. The performance of an internal combustion engine is

usually summarized in a single map plotted in a plane whose axles are the rotational

speed e and the torque (or power Pe) as shown in Figure 4.4. Often the former is

reported in rpm and the latter in Nm (or in kw if power); in the present text however S.I.

units, i.e. rad/s will be used, according to the following relation:

2 ne

e = ( 4.1)

60

The choice about the characteristic representation does not make sense because power

and torque are related by the speed. Specifically,

Pe = Tee ( 4.2)

The internal combustion engine is connected to the wheels through a transmission

system which includes a clutch, a gear selector (or gear box) and some joints.

The relationship between the angular velocity of the engine and the velocity of the

wheels is simply given by:

_________________________________________________________________________________ 41

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

c d

e = ( 4.3)

c d w

where c and d are the transmission ratios (defined as the ratio between the velocities of

the output and the input shafts) of the gearbox and the final drive respectively.

Moreover, c and d are the efficiency of the gearbox and the final drive. Note that the

transmission ratio and the efficiency of the gearbox are a function of gear in. Instead,

the other parameters of the final drive are constant. The efficiency of the gearbox is

usually smaller than 1.

However, the relationship between the angular velocity of the wheels and the velocity

of the vehicle is given from the Equation (3.1), shown in the following relationship:

u = w Rr ( 4.4)

This model can be considered as the first important aspect of the complete vehicle

model. The characteristic curve of an internal combustion engine defines the torque

supplied as function of the engine speed ne and throttle opening that is as function of a

parameter able to show how much the throttle should be opened.

Conceptually, the throttle opening is proportional to the mass flow rate of air. In fact,

the throttle opening assumes included values between 0, section completely closed and

1 (or percent value) for fully opened.

Usually, the output engine torque is measured with a test-engine linked to a brake

system, in maximum and minimum admissions. During these two steady-state

conditions, the corresponding characteristic curves can be pointed out . A representative

characteristic of the gasoline engine is shown in Figure 4.4 and 4.5, in dimensionless

form.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 42

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

Engine map

250

200

150

Engine Torque [Nm]

100

50

th=0

th=0.2

th=0.3

th=0.4

0

th=0.5

th=0.6

th=0.7

th=0.8

-50 th=0.9

th=1

-100

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000

1

0.8

0.6

0.4

Te/Temax [/]

th=0

0.2 th=20%

th=30%

th=40%

th=50%

0 th=60%

th=70%

th=80%

th=90%

th=100%

-0.2

-0.4

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

ne/nemax [/]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 43

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

Numerically, this picture is an element matrix because it represents the engine torque as

function of the engine speed for a fixed throttle opening.

In intermediate conditions, with a good approximation, the engine torque is a linear

function of throttle opening, so the engine torque is expressed by the following relation:

where Temax and Temin represent the maximum and minimum value of the engine torque

Te, [24].

These two models will be illustrated directly in the Chapter 6, with the main details. The

complete gearbox is simulated. The presence of the clutch is neglected.

A driver typically control vehicle speed by depressing the accelerator pedal to request

positive torque or depressing the brake pedal (not modeled) to request negative torque.

In a conventional vehicle, positive torque is supplied only by the combustion engine,

and negative torque is supplied only by the brakes. Perhaps, to develop the complete

vehicle model, but not taking into account the brake model, the negative torque is

supplied by the close-throttle manoeuvreing (as well to work with negative torque

value) and the total resistent motion.

In this section, the principal aim is to reduce all the mechanical system into a reduced

system in order to work with an easier vehicle model.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 44

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

For this reason an equivalent dynamic system, including all vehicle parts, (rotating and

translating ones) will carried out. From the mathematical point of view, the Kinetics

Energy Theorem end Principle of DAlembert will be used.

Consider a vehicle with a mechanical transmission with a number of different gear

ratios. Schematically, in according to Figure 4.2, the complex system studied, before

reducing, is shown in Figure 4.6. Note the new parameters introduced, c, c, d, d, Ie

and Iw.

These parameters represent a great physical mean:

Ie: Engine Inertia;

Iw: Wheel Inertia;

c: Transmission Gear box ratio;

d: Final drive ratio;

c, d: Gear box and Final drive efficiency.

In order to reduce the whole mechanical system into an equivalent one, we can assume

that is only a physical system (without energy transferred). The vehicle can be modeled

as two moments of inertia, one to model the engine and one to model the vehicle; see

Figure 4.7 (a) and (b). The first one includes the moment of inertia of the engine, up to

the flywheel, while the moment of inertia of the clutch disks, of the shaft entering the

gearbox, of all the rotating parts, reduced to the engine shaft, and the mass of the

vehicle as seen from the engine are included in the second

_________________________________________________________________________________ 45

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

Figure 4.7: Driveline Complex Model. (a) Transmission Engaged; (b) Transmission Disengaged.

In accordance with our convention (RHL), we can note the opposite orientations of the

torques applied at shaft, because the first on the left is drive and the second one is

resistent.

To simplify the theoretical model, we start from the following working hypothesis:

Transmission shaft is rigid, as well as the stiffness ks and has an infinite value.

This makes things easier;

Transmission is engaged-disengaged immediately, the clutch system is

neglected. Actually, this working hypothesis is not satisfied; only making a

good setup of the implementation model, a realistic approximation can be

obtained. So, the final esteemed system is shown in Figure 4.8.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 46

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

engine itself) must increase their angular velocity. Resorting to this expedients, it is

possible to write only one equation, linking the engine torque with kinetic energy of the

vehicle [23, 24, 29].

Fundamental equations for the driveline will be derived by using the generalized

Newtons second law of motion.

The state equation of the speed is given below:

d

Pe Pl = ( 4.6)

dt

where:

: Kinetic Energy of the vehicle;

Ieq: Equivalent Inertia;

Te: Engine Power;

Tl: Load Power.

Note that the engine power Pe should be the one provided in non steady-state running.

The kinetic energy of the vehicle, seen as an equivalent system can be expressed as

1 1 n 1

= I 2 +

2

2 i =1

mi vi 2 = I eqe 2

2

( 4.7)

where the sum extends to all translating elements which must be accelerated when the

vehicle speeds up. Making a derivate of the kinetic energy we obtain

d de 1 2 dI eq

= I eqe + e ( 4.8)

dt dt 2 dt

Generally, the equivalent inertia changes in time if a torque converter is used because of

the transmission ratio of the gearbox. If we consider that the equivalent inertia does not

_________________________________________________________________________________ 47

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

change very fast, the former equation should have the following correction. Usually this

change is very small, however, so it is possible to neglect it.

d d e

= I eqe ( 4.9)

dt dt

The term on the left of equal, net power, is quantified according to Equation (4.6)

Pe Pl = (Te Tl ) e ( 4.10)

d

I eq e = Te Tl ( 4.11)

dt

where:

e: Engine Rotational Speed;

Ieq: Equivalent Inertia;

Te: Engine Torque;

Tl: Load Torque.

It is possible to obtain the same formula in terms of power and linear velocity:

du

meq u = Pe Pl ( 4.12)

dt

Consider the vehicle shown in Figure 3.7, in which the major significant forces are

shown. So, paying attention to the term on the right of equal, Tl, the latter is a sum of

some contributions:

where:

Tr,aero: Aerodynamics Torque;

Tr,rolling: Rolling Resistent Torque;

_________________________________________________________________________________ 48

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

In our simulations, we assumed that only the slope torque is constant (not during time)

and known by the driver behaviour. In this way, there is not a direct connection between

the engine speed and the engine torque, but continuously an update for these.

In order to construct only an equation, we need an explicit form of the equivalent inertia

Ieq; it assumes the form:

with:

Iengine: Engine Inertia;

Ir,chassis: Chassis Inertia;

Ir,wheel: Wheel Inertia;

In order to integrate numerically Equation 4.11, an explicit form of the whole physical

terms, present in it, is required. This means, to perform two operations on the effective

system; see Figure 4.8, namely Reductions of mass and Reduction of forces,

applying the Kinetics Energy Theorem and Principle of DAlembert respectively [23,

24, 29].

From a general point of view, a force Fe, applied to a generic point of the effective9

system, can be reduced10 into a force Fr, acting to the reduced system (or into a torque

Tr), only fixing a reduction axle. The equivalence is verified if the works carried out

by the each forces are equal. Considering dse and dsr, the displacement of the previous

points, we have the following relation:

and so we obtain:

9 The forces acting on the effective system Fe are denoted through the pedics e.

10 Analogy with note 1 the forces and the torques acting on the reduced system Fr and Tr are denoted

through the pedics r too.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 49

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

dse

Fr = Fe ( 4.16)

dsr

Likewise, considering the reduction of a moment Tr, acting on the normal plane to the

selected axle, the elementary rotation around this latter, d must be considered. So, the

following relationship must be satisfied:

Fe dse = Tr d r ( 4.17)

and so:

dse

Tr = Fe ( 4.18)

d r

According to this concept, all the machine members can be reduced to an equivalent

system, namely Equivalent Flywheel.

The external forces acting on the vehicle to develop the reduced system are:

Aerodynamics Force in straight condition (without taking account of the positive

and negative lift);

Rolling Force at tyre-ground contact;

Grade Resistent (or slope force) acting in the centre of gravity.

The reduction of forces, considered as a general principle, is performed trough the

equality of the work carried out by the effective forces (acting on the effective system)

and the work carried out by the reduced ones (acting on the reduced system).

The aerodynamic drag is characterized by the equation:

1

Faero = Fe,aero = air SCxu 2 ( 4.19)

2

Applying the Principle of DAlembert to reduce this force on the engine shaft:

_________________________________________________________________________________ 50

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

dse

Tr ,aero = Fe ,aero ( 4.20)

d r

dse = ue dt ( 4.21)

and

d r = dt ( 4.22)

ue

Tr ,aero = Fe ,aero ( 4.23)

From the relationship between the velocity of the vehicle and the velocity of the wheels

we obtain:

w

Tr ,aero = Fe,aero Rr ( 4.24)

e

Where parameter Rr represents the effective rolling radius. However, taking into

account of the relation of the rotational wheel velocity and the engine velocity we have

finally an expression of the reduced aerodynamics force:

cd 1

Tr ,aero = Fe,aero Rr = air SCx Rr c d u 2 ( 4.25)

c d 2 c d

11 To note that the angular velocity is the velocity of a flywheel with mass equal to Ir which is rotating

around the reduction axle. Specially, this velocity corresponds to the rotational engine velocity because

the engine shaft was chosen as reduction axle.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 51

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

1

Tr ,aero = air SCx c d Rr 3w 2 ( 4.26)

2 c d

1 c 3d 3 3 2

Tr ,aero = air SCx 3 3 Rr e ( 4.27)

2 c d

The rolling resistent force can be expressed as :

where W represents the weight of the vehicle. We can obtain the same expression for

the rolling force reduced to the engine shaft:

dse

Fr ,rolling = Fe,rolling ( 4.29)

d r

Replacing these in the rolling resistent relation:

ue

Fr , rolling = Fe ,rolling ( 4.30)

e

and so we finally obtain:

w

Fr ,rolling = Fe,rolling Rr ( 4.31)

e

Therefore, using the relationship between rotational wheel velocity and the engine

velocity we finally obtain an expression of the reduced rolling force too:

_________________________________________________________________________________ 52

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

cd

Fr ,rolling = Fe, rolling R ( 4.32)

c d r e

c d

Fr ,rolling = Wf r R ( 4.33)

c d r e

The grade force can be expressed as follows:

where i indicates the slope road. By applying the Principle of DAlembert to reduce this

force on the engine shaft, we obtain again:

dse

Fr , slope = Fe, slope ( 4.35)

d r

with dse and dr which are not chancing expression. Representing the latter quantities in

explicitly we have:

ue

Fr , slope = Fe, slope ( 4.36)

e

By considering the relationship between the velocity of the vehicle, the velocity of the

engine, we can obtain:

w

Fr , slope = Fe, slope Rr ( 4.37)

e

_________________________________________________________________________________ 53

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

where the parameter Rr represents the effective rolling radius. However, taking into

account of the relation of the rotational wheel velocity and the engine velocity we have

finally an expression of the reduced aerodynamics force:

cd

Fr , slope = Fe, slope Rr ( 4.38)

c d

c d

Fr , slope = WRr i ( 4.39)

c d

Note that this resistent force is a constant in opposition with the other ones, and its value

changes only as function of the slope grade and not changing with the velocity.

As is the case for the reduction of forces, it is possible to do the same thing, estimating

the reduced inertias of our model, applying the Kinetics Energy Theorem [23, 24, 29].

Given a point or an axle belonging to the effective system, the reduction of masses can

be performed, by substituting each mass me of the effective system for a mass mr

reduced to the point of reduction, imposing the invariance of Kinetic Energy.

By noting with ue the velocity of the effective mass (as well the point of application of

this mass) and with ur the velocity of the reduced mass (as well the point of

application), we can impose the invariance of kinetic energy:

1 1

meue 2 = mr ur 2 ( 4.40)

2 2

therefore,

ue 2

mr = me 2 ( 4.41)

ur

_________________________________________________________________________________ 54

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

The mass me, translating with velocity ue, can be reduced to a rotating mass mr, having

velocity around a reduction axle, from which it is distant of r. This can be obtained by

expressing the following relationship:

1 1

meue 2 = mr 2 r 2 ( 4.42)

2 2

and:

I r = mr r 2 ( 4.43)

it is possible to obtain:

meue 2 = I r 2 ( 4.44)

and we have the final expression about the reduced inertia as function of the effective

parameters:

ue 2

I r = me ( 4.45)

2

to a flywheel, namely Ir which is rotating with velocity around the reduction axle,

only if the following relation is satisfied:

1 1

I ee 2 = I r 2 ( 4.46)

2 2

e 2

I r = Ie ( 4.47)

2

_________________________________________________________________________________ 55

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

The engine is constituted by rotating and translating parts. By considering only the

rotating ones, we directly need just in an explicit form the engine inertia:

where:

Icgi: Crank Gear Inertia;

Ifw: Flywheel Inertia;

mc: Crank Mass;

mcr: Connecting Rod Big End Mass;

Rc: Crank Radius;

ncyl: Cylinder Number;

The Figure 4.9 shows the basic nomenclature of the correcting rod of an internal

combustion engine12. For an accurate description of all components see [28].

The vehicle mass (chassis), can be expressed in an inertia form using the relationship

(4.45):

ue 2

I r ,chassis = me ,chassis ( 4.49)

2

12 The connecting rod inertia should be to concentrated into two points, connecting rod (the mass of the

piston included) and in other point situated near the connecting rod big end. For completeness, calling m1

the former and m2 the latter it should have m1=m h/(c+h) and m2=m c/(c+h), where h=Izz/mc with Izz the

moment of inertia of the connecting rod about the orthogonal axis to the paper and m is the mass of the

connecting rod which may be measured experimentally. The terms c and h represent the distant of the

centre of the connecting rod and the position of m2 to the centre of gravity of the rod. To note that the

position of the mass m2 is not defined completely; in fact it is assumed to be coincident with the big end

of the connecting rod (with an opportune measuring of the relief).

_________________________________________________________________________________ 56

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

As in the former section, about the reduced forces, we can have the same expression for

the reduced inertia, explaining the vehicle velocity:

w 2

I r ,chassis = me ,chassis Rr 2

( 4.50)

e 2

where it is still the concept about the rotational velocity . Substituting the relationship

between the angular velocity of the wheels for that of the engine:

2

I r ,chassis = me,chassis Rr c d

2

( 4.51)

c d

Each wheel mass can be considered as an inertia performing the relationship (4.47):

e 2

I r , wheel = I e, wheel 2 ( 4.52)

where Ie,wheel is the effective inertia of the wheel. As was the case for the chassis mass,

we have the same expression for the reduced inertia of the wheel, noting that the

effective angular velocity is that of the wheel:

w 2

I r , wheel = I e , wheel ( 4.53)

e 2

Therefore, by substituting the relationship between the angular velocity of the wheels

and the engine one:

_________________________________________________________________________________ 57

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

2

I r , wheel = I e, wheel c d ( 4.54)

c d

From the Equation (4.12) the maximum acceleration the vehicle is capable of at the

various speeds is immediately obtained

du Pe Pl

= ax = ( 4.55)

dt max meq u

where the engine power Pe is the maximum power that the engine can deliver at the

speed e related to speed u.

The plot of the maximum acceleration versus the speed for a vehicle with a five speed

gearbox is reported in Figure 4.10, and 4.11.

The minimum time needed to accelerate from speed u1 to speed u2 can be computed by

separating the variables in Equation (4.11)and integrating

u2

meq

Tu1 u2 = P P udu

u1 e l

( 4.56)

The integral must be performed separately for each velocity range in which the

equivalent mass is constant because in this way the gearbox works with a fixed

transmission ratio. Although it is possible to integrate analytically Equation (4.11) if the

maximum power is a polynomial, numerical integration is usually performed.

A graphical interpretation of the integration is performed, as shown in Figure 4.12. The

area under the curve:

1 meq u

= ( 4.57)

ax Pe Pl

_________________________________________________________________________________ 58

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

The speeds at which gear shifting must occur to minimize acceleration time are readily

identified on the plot 1/a(u), as shown in Figure 4.13, and 4.14

As the area under the curve is the acceleration time or the time to speed, the area must

be minimized and the gears must be shifted at the intersection of the various curves. If

they do not intersect, the short gear must be used up to the maximum engine speed.

The areas between the dashed and the continuous lines account for the time which must

be added due to the presence of a finite number of speeds: the transmission ratios,

during the project phase, can be chosen in such a way to minimize this area.

By increasing the number of speeds the acceleration time is reduced, as the actual curve

gets nearer to the ideal dashed line.

However, at each gear shift there is a time in which the clutch is disengaged and

consequently the vehicle does not accelerate: increasing the number of speeds leads to

an increase of the number of gear shifting and thus of the time wasted without

acceleration. Obviously, this restricts the use of high number of gear ratios.

The characteristic curves, such as speed-time at maximum power, and many others,

(which can be easily obtained by integrating the equation of motion), are reported in

Figure 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, and 4.18.

Through further integration it is possible to obtain the distance needed to accelerate to

any value of the speed

t2

t1

_________________________________________________________________________________ 59

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

6

1th gear

2nd gear

3rd gear

5 4th gear

5th gear

4

ax [m/s 2]

0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

u [m/s]

-2

Maximum Acceleration Diagram

10

1th gear

2nd gear

3rd gear

4th gear

5th gear

-1

10

ax [m/s 2]

0

10

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

u [m/s]

Figure 4.11: Maximum Acceleration as function of the Speed in log scale and reverse.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 60

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

2

1.8

1.6

1.4

1.2

1/ax [s 2/m]

1

1th gear

0.8 2nd gear

3rd gear

4th gear

0.6 5th gear

0.4

0.2

0

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

u [m/s]

Figure 4.12: Function 1/a(u) and Search for the Optimum Speeds for Gear Shifting.

Figure 4.13: Function 1/a(u) and Search for the Optimum Speeds for Gear Shifting; the white area is the

time to speed.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 61

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

0

1/ax [s 2/m] 10

-1

10 1th gear

2nd gear

3rd gear

4th gear

5th gear

-2

10

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

u [m/s]

6500

6000

5500

5000

Engine Velocity [rpm]

4500

4000

3500

3000

2nd gear

3rd gear

2000 4th gear

5th gear

1500

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Vehicle Velocity [m/s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 62

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

Acceleration-time curve

6

1th gear

2nd gear

3rd gear

5

4th gear

5th gear

3

ax [m/s 2]

-1

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

time [s]

Speed-time curve

70

60

50

40

u [m/s]

30

20

1th gear

2nd gear

10

3rd gear

4th gear

5th gear

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 63

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

Distance-time curve

12000

1th gear

2nd gear

3rd gear

10000 4th gear

5th gear

8000

s [m]

6000

4000

2000

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

time [s]

Tangential Load rear time curve Tangential Load front time curve

4000 -60

-65

3000

-70

Fx2 [N]

Fx1 [N]

2000 -75

-80

1000

-85

0 -90

0 2 4 6 0 2 4 6

time [s] time [s]

Load Transfer rear time curve Load Transfer front time curve

4000 4500

3500

4000

Fz2 [N]

Fz1 [N]

3000

2500 2nd gear

3rd gear

4th gear

2000 3000 5th gear

0 2 4 6 0 2 4 6

time [s] time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 64

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

1 1

Traction Parameter

Traction Parameter

in 2nd gear [/]

in 1th gear [/] 0.5 0.5

0 0

-2 0 2 4 6 8 -2 0 2 4 6 8

time [s] time [s]

1 1

Traction Parameter

Traction Parameter

in 3rd gear [/]

0.5 0.5

0 0

-2 0 2 4 6 8 -2 0 2 4 6 8

time [s] time [s]

1

Traction Parameter

in 5th gear [/]

0.5

Traction Parameter

Traction Limit

0

-2 0 2 4 6 8

time [s]

100 80

80

60

60

Pe [kw]

Pl [kw]

40

40

20

20

0 0

0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150 200

time [s] time [s]

20 60

1th gear

50 2nd gear

15 3rd gear

40 4th gear

Prolling [kw]

Paero [kw]

5th gear

10 30

20

5

10

0 0

0 50 100 150 200 0 50 100 150 200

time [s] time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 65

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

300

200

Te [Nm]

100

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Rolling Torque time curve

30

Trolling [Nm]

20

10

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Aerodynamics Torque time curve

100

1th gear

Taero [Nm]

2nd gear

50 3rd gear

4th gear

5th gear

0

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

time [s]

100 80

80

60

60

Pe [kw]

Pl [kw]

40

40

20

20

0 0

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Engine Velocity [rpm] Engine Velocity [rpm]

20 60

1th gear

50 2nd gear

15 3rd gear

40 4th gear

Prolling [kw]

Paero [kw]

5th gear

10 30

20

5

10

0 0

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

Engine Velocity [rpm] Engine Velocity [rpm]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 66

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

300

200

Te [Nm]

100

0

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000

Rolling Torque vs Engine Velocity

30

Trolling [Nm]

20

10

0

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000

Aerodynamics Torque vs Engine Velocity

100

1th gear

Taero [Nm]

2nd gear

50 3rd gear

4th gear

5th gear

0

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000

Engine Velocity [rpm]

The vehicle-following simulation is conducted to evaluate the dynamic performance of

the vehicle in the longitudinal direction. The powertrain model with the gearbox is used

in the simulation.

Throttle opening manoeuvres determine the developing of the low of motion of the

vehicle, during the transient condition. In fact, varying this input signal, the engine

torque produced changes completely. For this reason, the low of variation of the throttle

opening during the time will be shown. Among many signals which can be chosen, the

ramp-signal is taken into account; see Figure 4.25 for a accurate description. In other

words, the driver increases the throttle opening from zero to full opening value, varying

the throttle with linear way. The time required to obtain the full value is fixed at 2

seconds.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 67

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

100

90

80

70

60

[%]

50

40

30

20

10

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

time [s]

The temporal function of the vehicle can be obtained by integrating the equation of

motion of the system. This latter cannot be integrated with an analytical method owing

to the dependence of the engine torque by the angular velocity of the engine. Therefore,

it is required a numerical method, such as Runge-Kutta Method 4th order.

In order to conclude the longitudinal behaviour investigation, the numerical application

about the previous sections, will be shown. In order to simulate the dynamic behaviour

of the real vehicle, it was decided to use, like the test vehicle, Renault Mgane Coup

16V 150 hp. This test-vehicle will be the same used for the validation of the complete

model, explained in the 6th chapter; see Figure 4.26. In Appendix A are shown all the

parameters used for the simulations.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 68

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

Figure 4.26: Test Vehicle, Renault Mgane Coup 16V 150 HP.

Simulation results are shown in Figures 4.27 to 4.32. During the initial vehicle

manoeuvre, it is considered the former with a first gear in. It is assumed the gear change

between nmax=5000 rpm and nmin=2000 rpm values. The gear change is also assumed

with a simplified manoeuvre, without locked and unblocked clutch, but only

considering the instantaneous ratios of transmission.

The Figures 4.27, 4.28 and 4.29 show the vehicle acceleration, velocity and

displacement evolutions during six seconds simulated, respectively. One should note

that the maximum acceleration touched is almost equal to 5 m/s2 later than 2 s. Also, the

velocity reached after the simulation time was about 23 m/s, equal to 82 km/h. A good

result was obtained for according the displacement of the vehicle too an equal to 80 m

later than 6s. Instead, the Figure 4.30 indicates the normal and tangential forces acting

at front and rear tyres.

As it is possible to note, in corresponding to the maximum acceleration, with the full

opening throttle, the tangential rear force assumes its maximum value, equal to 3300 N.

At the same time, the normal load at the rear wheel reached is equal to 3200 N. So, in

this way the rear wheels found themselves in a critical condition, defined in the

chapter2.

In fact, Figure 4.30 (plot-bar) shows the correspondent value assumed by the traction

parameter and the traction limit, equal to 1.08 for dry road. Finally, in the Figure 4.30

and 4.32 it is possible to note how the value assumed by the aerodynamic torque,

applied at known distance from the centre of gravity, is smaller than the rolling one.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 69

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

Obviously, being the velocity of the vehicle small during the first 5 seconds of the

simulation, the aerodynamic torque is small because it is a function proportional to the

square velocity.

The opposite case happens after this time and the aerodynamic torque, such as the

aerodynamic power, is bigger than the rolling ones. As well, it is interesting to note the

engine power released that, during the change gear is decreasing and immediately after

it is increasing to tend to the constant steady-state value.

5

4.5

3.5

3

ax [m/s 2]

2.5

1.5

0.5

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 70

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

25

20

15

u [m/s]

10

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

time [s]

Distance-time curve

80

70

60

50

Distance [m]

40

30

20

10

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 71

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

4000 -55

-60

2000

Fx2 [N]

Fx1 [N]

-65

0

-70

-2000 -75

0 2 4 6 0 2 4 6

time [s] time [s]

3500 4500

3000 4000

Fz2 [N]

Fz1 [N]

2500 3500

2000 3000

0 2 4 6 0 2 4 6

time [s] time [s]

1.5

Traction Parameter [/]

0.5

Traction Parameter

0 Traction Limit

-2 0 2 4 6 8

time [s]

Power-time curve

100

90

80

70 Pe

Pl

Prolling

60 Paero

Pslope

Power [kw]

50

40

30

20

10

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 72

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

Torque-time curve

250

200

150

Torque [Nm]

Te

Trolling

Taero

Tslope

100

50

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 73

Longitudinal Dynamics Model____________________________________________________________

Figure 4.34: Reference Normal and Tangential Forces at Rear Tyre [25]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 74

Chapter 5

There are numerous degrees of freedoms associated with vehicle dynamics. Obviously,

the choice about how many variables to consider depends on aim study that it will make

about. According to a brief research study of typical vehicle models, a linear two-

degree-of-freedom (2D.O.F.s), a linear four-degree of freedom vehicle model

(4D.O.F.s), and a non-linear four-degree-of-freedom (4D.O.F.s) will be used in this

research in order to explain the principal characteristics about the transversal behaviour

of the vehicle [20].

To achieve an easy vehicle model but able to describe a lot of dynamics characteristics

it is very interesting to fix all the working hypotheses which are the grounds of a good

research.

The formulation of the following model takes into account these assumptions:

the vehicle is a rigid body;

the vehicle is moving on a level road, comparable as a geometrical plane;

without suspension system;

the longitudinal velocity is steady-time, only for this model;

the trajectories have a large radius of curvature, without influences of the pitch

and roll motion so that the variations of the camber angle can be neglected;

_________________________________________________________________________________ 75

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

the vehicle has a rigid steering system, so that the swerving wheels (wheel

angle) is coupled directly by the steering angle;

the weight of the wheels does not have an influence regarding the weight of the

vehicle, so the position of the centre of gravity does not change;

The total effect of these considerations leads to construct a tow degree of freedom

model (longitudinal motion constant), that is moving in plane motion.

According to foregoing statements, we can proceed to formulate the mathematical

model. Consider the rigid body having mass m and centre of gravity G, as shown in

Figure 5.1. Even though the vehicle is equipped by tow wheels steering, but their mass

is supposed negligible.

As usual, it is fixed a coordinate system (x, y, z; G) behind the vehicle, so called Body

Axis, with the origin situated in the centre of gravity and versors (i, j, k). As shown in

Figure 5.1, x-axis is defined parallel to road and forward direct, z-axis is orthogonal to

the road and y-axis is perpendicular to ones and left direct.

Generally, this coordinate system does not coincide with the inertia central coordinate.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 76

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

However, for the longitudinal symmetry of vehicle in agreement with middle plane of

symmetry, lying on x and z axis, the y-axis is a central inertia axis. In this way, the

terms Jxy and Jyz are null but not the Jzx (for vehicle with order equal to 200 kg m^2).

In any case, the terms Jx, Jy and Jz are always not null. As previously mentioned, the

vehicle is a mechanical system, which is moving in Plane Motion. It is defined with

=r k the yaw velocity (or yawing rate or velocit di imbardata), with k versor to the

road and high direct. In according to fixed axis, for the Right Hand Low the yaw

velocity is positive if it is anticlockwise. It is also defined with VG the absolute centre of

gravity speed. The geometrical position of the centre of gravity is supposed and so fixed

through the lengths l1 and l2, called semi step. With l = l1 + l2 and t are called the

wheelbase (or passo) and track (or carreggiata) of vehicle (always measured from the

centre of the wheels) respectively. Simply, the front and rear track have the same length.

The kinematics steering(or sterzatura cinematica), defined how the steering with slip

angles (or drift angle or angolo di deriva) null, is shown in Figure 5.2.

Note that the steering angle of internal wheel i is bigger than the external one, e. This

observation leads to the sequent kinematical relation:

t 1 1

= ( 5.1)

l tan ( e ) tan ( i )

and so, we have:

t

e = i i2 + O ( i3 ) ( 5.2)

l

_________________________________________________________________________________ 77

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

5.1. According to foregoing statements, we can proceed to formulate the mathematical

model by three groups of equations:

equations of congruence

equations of equilibrium

constitutive equations.

As known, the side angle individualizes the direction of the vector velocity of centre

wheel as regards to the symmetric longitudinal plane of the same centre. This angle is

assumed positive when clockwise. Since the vehicle is supposed rigid, the velocity of

the centre of gravity VG and the yaw velocity univocity characterize the slip angles ij of

the four wheels (with i=1,2 and j=1,2).

Suitably, as represented in Figure 5.3, we express the absolute velocity VG of the centre

of gravity considering a coordinate system (x, y, z; G) behind the vehicle. Defined the

versors i, j and k the vector velocity is described as:

VG = ui + vj ( 5.3)

The longitudinal component of the vector velocity u is called feed velocity (or velocit

di avanzamento) whereas the lateral component v is called lateral velocity (or velocit

laterale). Since the centre of gravity does not move in regard to the coordinate system,

before defined, the Equation 5.3 describes only the velocity components in two

directions.

Mathematically, it is translated into the following equation:

v

= arctan ( 5.4)

u

_________________________________________________________________________________ 78

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

It is defined, Sideslip angle (or vehicle attitude or body slip angle or angolo di

assetto) the angle between the longitudinal axis of vehicle and the direction of absolute

velocity (in the centre of gravity).

If we consider the absolute velocities of the centres wheel we can link the slip angle ij

with the yaw velocity r and the translational components of velocity u and v.

As possible to note in Figure 5.4, 5.5, 5.6 and 5.7, the centres wheel have components

of velocity in longitudinal and lateral directions.

From the lateral point of view the front centres wheel have a velocity equal to v+r l1 and

the rear ones equal to v-r l2.

Instead in longitudinal direction the wheels on the left side (as regards to x-axis) have a

velocity equal to u-r(t/2) and these in right side a velocity equal to u+r(t/2).

_________________________________________________________________________________ 79

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

The slip angles are function of two basic motion variables, v (or ) and r. The

relationships are developed below:

v + rl1

tan ( 11 ) =

u r (t / 2)

v + rl1

tan ( 12 ) =

u + r (t / 2)

( 5.5)

v rl2

tan ( 21 ) =

u r (t / 2)

v rl2

tan ( 22 ) =

u + r (t / 2)

_________________________________________________________________________________ 80

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

t

u= r ( 5.6)

2

that means the wheels splined on the same axis have the same slip angles. For this

reason, it is possible to denote with f the slip angle for either front wheels and with r

the slip angle for the rear wheels.

According to this common hypothesis, the previous relationships become:

v + rl1

tan ( f ) =

u r (t / 2)

( 5.7)

v rl2

tan ( r ) =

u

Actually, during normal conditions the external slip angle as regards to the curve is

slightly smaller than the internal one. This is only as geometrical consideration due by

kinematics performance.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 81

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

As shown in the latterly figures, the position of the centre of rotation defines univocity

all the slip angles.

Figure 5.8: Relation between Slip Angles and Centre of Rotation Position

_________________________________________________________________________________ 82

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

To simplify it, we can consider that the longitudinal velocity is always bigger than the

lateral one and the other velocity caused by the yawing rate. Mathematically, we have:

u = v + rl1

( 5.8)

u = v rl2

and so, we can approximately change the arc with its tangent (tangent with its

argument):

v + rl1

f =

u

( 5.9)

v rl2

r =

u

v + rl1

f =

u

( 5.10)

v rl2

r =

u

where:

: steering angle;

l1: centre of gravity location from vehicle front axle;

l2: centre of gravity location from vehicle rear axle;

r: yaw velocity of vehicle;

v: lateral velocity of vehicle;

u: longitudinal velocity of vehicle.

In order to investigate about the instantaneous position of the vehicle, the Figure 5.6

illustrates the vehicle motion as regards the fixed reference axis (x0, y0, z0; O0), united

with the road, namely ground axis, as described in Chapter 3.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 83

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

The rotational angle of the vehicle at a generic instant of time t=t is available

through the yaw rate integration, supposed now known.

t'

( t ') ( t ) = r ( t ) dt ( 5.11)

0

This particular angle is called yaw angle, and it is able to show at any moment the

angular position of the vehicle.

So, it also possible to know the coordinates of the centre of gravity of the vehicle, as

regards to the same reference system. In fact, through the equation (5.11) we have

absolute coordinates of the centre of the gravity, x0G and y0G during each instant t=t

t' t'

X G = x0 G

( t ') x0 ( t ) = x&0 ( t ) dt = u ( t ) cos ( t ) v ( t ) sin ( t ) dt

G

0 0

( 5.12)

t' t'

YG = y0 G

( t ') y0 ( t ) = y&0 ( t ) dt = u ( t ) sin ( t ) + v ( t ) cos ( t ) dt

G

0 0

Therefore, the position of the vehicle YG=YG(XG) will be obtained, being known the yaw

rate as function of the time and the longitudinal and lateral velocity. It means that the

equation of motion of the system should have to be written, and integrated successively.

Substantially the equation of equilibrium can be written only after the computation of

acceleration and the estimation of the forces and moments applied to the vehicle.

The expression of the acceleration of the centre of gravity, aG, can be immediately

obtained deriving the velocity of the same point, VG, as function of the time t ; Equation

5.3.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 84

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

Obviously we must have into account that the versors i and j are changing direction

while the vehicle is moving through particular relations13:

dVG

aG = = u&i+urj+v&j- vri

dt

= ( u& - vr ) i+ ( v& + ur ) j ( 5.13)

= ax i+a y j

Therefore, the acceleration of the centre of gravity has been broken up decomposed into

longitudinal and lateral directions:

ax = u& - vr ( 5.14)

and

a y = v& + ur ( 5.15)

di dj

13 The versors are a function of the time and so the derivate are developed: = rj and = ri .

dt dt

_________________________________________________________________________________ 85

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

As known on a vehicle there are three kind of acting forces:

force of gravity supposed acting in the centre of gravity;

force of contact tyre-ground at four wheels;

force of aerodynamics field due air resistent.

The external forces acting on the vehicle as a rigid body originate, at any moment, a

resultant force acting in a variable direction. In according to our fixed coordinate system

(x, y, z; G), it is defined with (X, Y, Z), the components of the resultant force totally

acting on the vehicle and with (L, M, N), its components of moments.

It is possible to write the equations of equilibrium, Newtons Laws about the rigid

body which is moving in plane motion, having mass m and moment of inertia J, in Z-

axis direction.

Synthetically, the equations are developed into the following relations:

max = X

ma y = Y ( 5.16)

Jr& = Z

where X, Y and Z are the sum of longitudinal, transversal and rotational forces

respectively.

The most important forces acting on the vehicle are the traction forces tyre-ground,

shown in Figure 5.6. Strictly speaking, there are the aerodynamics resistent which is

proportional to the square velocity and the lateral force (for example exercised as

impulse by the wind).

In according to the conventions about the tyres, it is indicated with Fxij and Fyij the

longitudinal and lateral components of traction forces14 into point of contact tyre-

ground. Formally, in these forces Fxij and Fyij the traction and rolling forces are included

too.

14 The longitudinal and lateral forces Fxij and Fyij are denoted through the pedics i and j where the first

describes the longitudinal or lateral direction and the second left or right wheels.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 86

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

According to the working hypothesis about the steer angle, and particularly, for steer

angle in order to 15 degrees, we can linearize the equilibrium relationships. With

reference to Figure 5.10 the equilibrium equations are below shown:

m (v& + ur ) = ( Fx11 + Fx12 ) + ( Fy 11 + Fy 12 ) + ( Fy 21 + Fy 22 )

( 5.17)

Jr& = ( Fx11 + Fx12 ) + ( Fy 11 + Fy 12 ) l1 ( Fy 21 + Fy 22 ) l 2 +

( Fx11 Fx12 ) + ( Fx 21 Fx 22 ) ( Fy 11 + Fy 12 )

t

2

1

Fxa = SCx u 2 ( 5.18)

2

For the symmetry of the vehicle, it is suited to sum the contributions of the same axle to

have a compact notation, as shown into following relations:

Fx 2 = Fx 21 + Fx 22

( 5.19)

Fy 1 = Fy 11 + Fy 12

Fy 2 = Fy 21 + Fy 22

If it is taken into account that the traction torque is shared among two wheels at the

same axle by an ordinary differential (not auto-locked) it has another reduction in the

equations:

Fx11 = Fx 12 ( 5.20)

Fx 21 = Fx 22

Even though there was a reduction into last equation of equilibrium there was always

the term (Fy11- Fy12)(t/2), but it is neglected for simplify.

15 The aerodynamic forces in lateral and vertical direction, Fyaero and Mzaero was neglected.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 87

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

The interesting observation made about these relationships is that even if the wheels at

the same axle work with the same slip angle, the lateral forces at the same axle do not

have the same value. For this reason it is Fy11Fy12.

m (v& + ur ) = Fx1 + Fy 1 + Fy 2 ( 5.21)

Jr& = Fx1 + Fy 1 l1 Fy 2l 2

To complete the vehicle dynamics modelling, we have to define the tyre behaviour at

each wheel. From a general point of view, the lateral forces Fyij are a function of slip

angle , camber angle , longitudinal force Fxij and load transfer Fzij. Taking into

account only the functional variation about the slip angle, we will formulate the tyre

model able to integrate the equation of motion.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 88

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

In the following section we again propose the linear tyre model. The most simplified

tyre model is a linear function, representing between the lateral force (or Cornering

Force) and the slip angle. This functional link is expressed into the following relation:

Fyi = Ci i ( 5.23)

and Ci is the tyre cornering stiffness. The field working is characterized by small slip

angle, which means the order of magnitude is equal to 1520 degrees on dry road.

The most simplified vehicle dynamic model is a two/four-degree-of-freedom bicycle

model (or single track model), Figure 5.11, representing the lateral and yaw motions.

The mean idea behind this model is that in first approximation to develop lateral theory

it is not necessary or desirable to include the longitudinal direction, because we can

consider it known. This model, which is easier to understand than the others, is often

used in teaching purposes.

Capturing all the motions of a vehicle into analytical equations can be quite difficult.

Although including more number of elements in the model may increase the models

accuracy, it substantially increases the computation time. This section describes the

derivation of the two-degree-of-freedom bicycle model used in this study. It also

includes the equations for the front and rear tyre slip angles.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 89

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

Into the following section, the two degrees of freedom model considered for this study

is shown. Referring to Figure 5.12, the lateral and yawing velocities of the vehicle with

respect to the fixed coordinate system, XYZ can be described as shown in Equation 5.17

by the equation of equilibrium, below reported:

m (v& + ur ) = Fx1 + Fy 1 + Fy 2 ( 5.24)

Jr& = Fx1 + Fy 1 l1 Fy 2 l 2

_________________________________________________________________________________ 90

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

v + rl1

f =

u

( 5.25)

v rl2

r =

u

which includes the constitutive equations, referring to the tyre model, described

through one of these Equations 3.32, 3.34, and 3.43:

Fyi = Ci i

d &

Fyi + Fyi = Ci i = Yp ( )

u ( 5.26)

d & C

Fyi + Fyi = Fz 1 exp

u Fz

Further simplification about these equilibrium equations can be shown if we consider

the longitudinal velocity constant and the rear traction. In this case, the equations are

uncoupled and the first equation is algebraic one.

However, the mathematical problem is uncoupled only when the steer and traction have

been at different axis, but in this work it happens only in rear traction case. Also, the

longitudinal front force, Fxi, which includes only the rolling and the slope resistent,

could be neglected (Fx1=0).

To note that the longitudinal force, Fx2, does not appear into the equilibrium equations

even if it is the traction force applied by the tyre during the vehicle motion.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 91

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

Finally, the lateral dynamics system, 2 D.O.F. is described with only two differential

equations into variables v(t) and r(t).

C + C 2 C l + C 2l 2 C + Fx1

v& = 1 v 1 1 + u r + 1

mu mu m

( 5.27)

C l C 2l 2 C 1l12 + C 2 l 22 C 1 + Fx1

r& = 1 1 v r + l1

Ju Ju J

These differential relations can be solved into analytical form too. During the following

paragraph we will show this kind of solution in comparison with the numerical form,

obtained by Matlab/Simulink software. Simply, the influence on the longitudinal force

Fxi can be neglected into the lateral problem, so the final equation of motion in rear

traction is:

C + C 2 C l + C 2l 2 C

v& = 1 v 1 1 + u r + 1

mu mu m

( 5.28)

C l C 2l 2 C 1l12 + C 2l 22 C 1

r& = 1 1 v r + l1

Ju Ju J

_________________________________________________________________________________ 92

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

To research the analytical solution, we had better have the state space representation of

the dynamic equations in (5.28) which is,

w=Aw+b

& ( 5.29)

where, w(t)=(v(t),r(t)) is the state variables vector and the known term is given by

b(t)=(C1/m, C1l1/J)(t) and the matrix A is:

C 1 + C 2 C 1l1 + C 2l 2

+ u

mu mu

A= ( 5.30)

C 1l1 C 2l 2 C 1l12 + C 2l 22

Ju Ju

One must note that the matrix A is a function of longitudinal velocity but not a steer

angle. The opposite case is vector b, which is a function of steering angle but not of a

longitudinal velocity.

The general solution of the equations of motion is a sum of a solution of associate

homogeneous problem and the solution of particular problem:

w ( t ) = wh ( t ) + wp ( t ) ( 5.31)

As known, the homogenous solution represents the transient history of the system,

instead the particular one the steady-state condition. Because the matrix A is not a

function of steer angle we can calculate the homogenous solution without fixed test of

simulation. In fact the first solution does not depend by the test simulation but the

second one can be valuated fixing the test of vehicle (for example Steering Pad and

Lateral Impulse).

The homogenous solution can be investigated imposing the known term vector as zero,

below shown:

_________________________________________________________________________________ 93

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

w

& h =Aw h ( 5.32)

exponential form:

w h ( t ) = ( vh ( t ) , rh ( t ) ) = x exp ( t ) ( 5.33)

& h ( t ) = x exp ( t )

w ( 5.34)

eigenvalues and eigenvectors problem.

The eigenvalues are obtained from the characteristic equation:

det ( A I ) = 0 ( 5.35)

2 tr ( A ) + det ( A ) = 0 ( 5.36)

tr ( A ) tr ( A ) 4 det ( A )

2

1,2 = ( 5.37)

2

tr ( A ) < 4 det(A)

2

( 5.38)

_________________________________________________________________________________ 94

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

1 C + C 2 C 1l12 + C 2l 2 2

tr ( A ) = 1 + <0 ( 5.39)

u m J

and

det ( A ) =

1

C 1C 2 ( l1 + l 2 ) mu 2 (C 1l1 C 2 l 2 )

2

( 5.40)

u mJ

2

tr ( A ) = 1 + 2

( 5.41)

det ( A ) = 12

( 1 )( 2 ) = 0 ( 5.42)

Once known the eigenvalues, the eigenvectors are known too, through:

(A I ) x = 0

i i ( 5.43)

where i=1,2.

The particular solution of the dynamics system can be obtained fixing the test of

vehicle.

Assuming a Steering pad test (or prova di colpo di sterzo), [30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35,

36], the particular solution is calculated from the system of equations:

Awp = b ( 5.44)

and so:

_________________________________________________________________________________ 95

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

vp =

(C 2 2 )

l l ml1u 2 C 1u

=

(C2 2 )

l l ml1u 2 C 1u

mJu det ( A )

2

C 1C 2l mu (C 1l1 C 2l 2 )

2 2

( 5.45)

C 1C 2lu C 1C 2lu

rp = =

mJu det ( A )

2

C 1C 2l mu 2 (C 1l1 C 2l 2 )

2

Once known vp and rp, lateral velocity and yaw rate in steady-state condition, it is

possible to calculate the bend radius, defined through the following relationship:

R p = = l ( 5.46)

rp C 1C 2 l

where the value of rp was substituted. Using the definition of the slip angle at front and

rear wheels we have:

v p + rp l1

1 p =

u

( 5.47)

v p rp l2

1 p =

u

and, immediately, the value of a characteristic velocity16 ut, which is illustrated for

completeness:

2

ut = ( 5.48)

4mv J ( C 1l1 C 2l2 )

2

Once known these variables, eigenvalues and eigenvectors are known and the solution,

consequently. In Appendix C, the Matlab m-file is illustrated.

In the following section the results concerning the analytical and numerical solution are

presented. The Runge-Kutta numerical method was used for the integration, with an

16 This velocity is defined as a particular velocity which defines a limited for the eigenvalue, changing

from real and negative values to complex and conjugate.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 96

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

integration step of 0.02 s and a simulation time of 1 s. Same set-up characteristics were

chosen for the other simulations, such as linear and non-linear model for the FWD

models. Step must be small enough, particularly, for the non-linear models.

In table 2 the principal symbols used in the equation of motion notation are illustrated.

A steering pad test was performed with a steering angle of 40 deg, as illustrated in

Figure 5.13; it means that the value assumed by the steering wheel angle17 was equal to

2 deg(about 0.035 rad).

CG location l1,l2 m always +

Wheelbase l m always +

Weight of vehicle W N always +

Gravitational acceleration G m/s2 always +

Mass of vehicle (W/g) mv Kg always +

Yawing moment of inertia Iz Kg m2 always +

Lateral force Fy N + to right

Longitudinal force Fx N + for backward

Lateral acceleration ay m/s2 + for forward

Lateral coefficient (ay/g) Ay / + for forward

Vehicle absolute velocity V m/s + for forward

Yawing velocity r rad/s + for anticlockwise

Lateral velocity v m/s + for left direction

Longitudinal velocity u m/s + for forward

Steer angle front wheels Rad + for anticlockwise

Slip angles f,r Rad + for clockwise

Vehicle slip angle Rad + for slip to left

Cornering stiffness C N/rad always +

17 As known, the steering angle is different by the steering wheel angle in reason of a transmission ratio

steer of value equal to 1620.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 97

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

40

35

30

25

[deg]

20

15

10

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

time [s]

0.16

0.14

0.12

0.1

r [rad/s]

0.08

0.06

0.04

r Analytical Sol

0.02

r Simulated

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 98

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

0.08

v Analytical Sol

v Simulated

0.06

0.04

0.02

v [m/s]

-0.02

-0.04

-0.06

-0.08

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

time [s]

3

Fy1 Analytical Sol

Fy1 Simulated

2.9

2.8

2.7

Fy1 [kN]

2.6

2.5

2.4

2.3

2.2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 99

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

1.4

1.2

1

Fy2 Analytical Sol

Fy2 Simulated

0.8

Fy2 [kN]

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

time [s]

0.035

0.034

0.033

0.032

Slip angle f [rad]

0.031

0.03

0.029

0.028

Slip Angle front Simulated

0.026

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 100

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

0.018

0.016

0.014

0.012

Slip Angle r [rad]

0.01

0.008

0.006

0.004

Slip Angle rear Simulated

0.002

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

time [s]

In the following treatment the equations for a single track model with linear tyre model

and relaxation length will be shown. One should note that in this case the degree of

freedom number of the system is changed. In fact, considering a linear tyre, the system

is a 2 D.O.F.s model, but taking into account a tyre model, traduced through a

differential equation, the new system will be defined as a 4 D.O.F.s model. In order to

develop this model completely, the equations (5.49) will be presented.

m (v& + ur ) = Fy 1 + Fy 2

Jr& = Fy 1l1 Fy 2 l 2

d & v + rl1 ( 5.49)

Fy 1 + Fy 1 = Cf u

u

d & rl v

Fy 2 + Fy 2 = Cr 2

u u

_________________________________________________________________________________ 101

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

In analogy, it will be necessary to illustrate the equation of motion using the non-linear

tyre model. Likewise the former case, the model is a 4 D.O.F., too. The value of the

constants required for the integration are included as Appendix B.

m (v& + ur ) = Fy 1 + Fy 2

Jr& = Fy 1l1 Fy 2 l 2

d & C v + rl1

Fy 1 + Fy 1 = Fz1 1 exp f ( 5.50)

u Fz1 u

d & C v rl 2

Fy 2 + Fy 2 = Fz 2 1 exp r

u Fz 2 u

Simulation results for the first time are illustrated in Figures 5.20 to 5.25. Later than this

observation time all the working variables assume already a steady-state condition.

Moreover, the yaw rate is a increasing monotonic function and the lateral velocity

acquires a relative maximum in corresponding of 0.1 second and than it reaches the

steady-state condition.

Through the congruence equations, it is not hard to obtain the slip angles response.

However, it is possible to note the lateral forces at the front and rear wheels tendency.

In fact, owing to the steep steer angle, the front force in lateral direction assumes a

discontinuity about zero value. On the basis of that, the lateral front force does not start

from the zero value but from beginning it assumes a constant value, approximately

equal to the steady-state value.

This happens only for the linear tyre model without relaxation length, and Actually, for

this reason it is not able to describe the dynamic behaviour of the vehicle.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 102

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

3

2.5

2

ay [m/s 2]

1.5

ay Linear model

0.5 ay Linear Model with relaxation length

ay Non-Linear Model with relaxation length

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time [s]

0.08

v Linear model

v Linear Model with relaxation length

0.06 v Non-Linear Model with relaxation length

0.04

0.02

0

v [m/s]

-0.02

-0.04

-0.06

-0.08

-0.1

-0.12

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 103

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

0.16

0.14

0.12

0.1

r [rad/s]

0.08

0.06

r Linear model

r Linear Model with relaxation length

0.04 r Non-Linear Model with relaxation length

0.02

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time [s]

3

2.5

2

Fy1[kN]

1.5

0.5

Fy1 Linear Model with relaxation length

Fy1 Non-Linear Model with relaxation length

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 104

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

1.4

1.2

0.8

Fy2 [kN]

0.6

0.4

0.2 Fy2 Linear Model with relaxation length

Fy2 Non-Linear Model with relaxation length

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time [s]

1.4

Linear model

Linear Model with relaxation length

Non-Linear Model with relaxation length

1.2

0.8

Y [m]

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

X [m]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 105

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

When the traction is assumed to be at the front wheels, namely front wheel drive, the

analytical solution is not possible, even if a linear tyre model could be used. In this case,

the solution does not exist and these equations can be solved only with numerical

methods. This mathematical difference approach is caused by a non-linearity due to the

product between the independent variables and the aerodynamic term. This does not

happen if a rear wheel drive is considered.

One should note that in the following equations the tractive rear force cannot be

considered equal to zero owing to the front wheel drive definition, and it will be

deduced using the equilibrium in the longitudinal direction.

Contrarily, the longitudinal rear force can be consider as null (Fx2=0) in order to

simplify the equations required to investigate about the vehicle behaviour.

The equation of motion of the lateral vehicle dynamics for a front wheel drive, equipped

with a linear tyre model, characterized through a 3 D.O.F. model, are shown in the

following section.

C + C 2 C l C 2l 2 C F

v& = 1 v vr 1 1 u r + 1 + u& + x1

mu mu m m

( 5.51)

C l C 2l 2 ml1 C 1l12 + C 2l 22 C1 + Fx1

r& = V 1 1 v vr r + l1

Ju J Ju J

where the longitudinal force at front wheel has been described by the following

relationship:

_________________________________________________________________________________ 106

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

According to the corresponding model for the rear wheel drive, in this section it will be

illustrated the equations of motion for a 5 D.O.F.s model with front traction.

m (v& + ur ) = Fy 1 + Fy 2 + Fx1

Jr& = Fy 1l1 Fy 2l 2 + Fx1l1

d & v + rl1 ( 5.53)

Fy 1 + Fy 1 = Cf u

u

d & rl v

Fy 2 + Fy 2 = C r 2

u u

With the tractive front force Fx1 is expressed by the following relation, deduced by the

equilibrium in longitudinal direction; deduced by the longitudinal direction:

To note that in all equations concerning the FWD (each time the 1th of 5.24 was used),

the longitudinal acceleration was not simplified because the final purpose is to couple

the longitudinal and lateral models considering the variability longitudinal velocity.

Obviously, for fixed feed velocity, the value corresponding to the acceleration is null.

In the complete vehicle model, except the vertical dynamics, the tractive force will be

formed by more contributions, that during this section did not be consider, such as, the

rolling resistent which cannot simplified owing to the longitudinal velocity variability.

In analogy to the former section, the front wheel drive model, 5 D.O.F. is traduced

through the following set of equations:

_________________________________________________________________________________ 107

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

m (v& + ur ) = Fy 1 + Fy 2 + Fx1

Jr& = Fy 1l1 Fy 2 l 2 + Fx1l1

d & C v + rl1 ( 5.55)

Fy 1 + Fy 1 = Fz1 1 exp f

u

Fz1 u

d & C v rl 2

Fy 2 + Fy 2 = Fz 2 1 exp r

u Fz 2 u

where Fx1 assumes the same form used in the linear front model with the relaxation

length, Eqs. (5.45).According to the former treatment about the simulations shown, the

front wheel drive model response will be proposed, with three different tyre models,

before analyzed, Figures 5.26 to 5.31.

4

3.5

2.5

ay [m/s 2]

Linear model

1.5 Linear model with relaxation legth

Non-Linear model with relaxation legth

0.5

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 108

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

0.15

v Linear model

v Linear Model with relaxation length

v Non-Linear Model with relaxation length

0.1

0.05

0

v [m/s]

-0.05

-0.1

-0.15

-0.2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time [s]

0.18

0.16

0.14

0.12

0.1

r [rad/s]

0.08

0.06

0.04

r Linear model

r Linear model with relaxation length

r Non-Linear model with relaxation length

0.02

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 109

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

3

2.5

2

Fy1 [kN]

1.5

0.5

Fy1 Linear model

Fy1 Linear model with relaxation length

Fy1 Non-Linear model with relaxation length

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time [s]

1.4

1.2

0.8

Fy2 [kN]

0.6

0.4

0.2

Fy2 Linear model

Fy2 Linear model with relaxation length

Fy2 Non-Linear model with relaxation length

0

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 110

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

1.4

Linear model

Linear model with relaxation length

Non-Linear model with relaxation length

1.2

0.8

Y [m]

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

X [m]

5.5.3 Conclusions

Schematically, the models developed in this section can be summarized in a single

table; see Table 5.2.

2 L

4 L with R-L

RWD

4 N-L with R-l

3 L

5 N-L with R-l

Table 5.2: Degrees of Freedom Corresponding to each Lateral Model

_________________________________________________________________________________ 111

Lateral Dynamics Model_________________________________________________________________

L: Linear tyre model without relaxation length;

L with R-L: Linear tyre model with relaxation length

N-L with R-L: Non-Linear tyre model with relaxation length

RWD: Rear wheel drive;

FWD: Front wheel drive.

To note that, for the vehicle complete model, so with the interaction between the

longitudinal and lateral variables, each model will acquire one degree of freedom

considering a linear tyre model with/without relaxation length and three degrees fo

freedom considering the non-linear tyre model. Schematically these concepts are

illustrated in the following table:

(D.O.F.s) (D.O.F.s)

1 2 3

1 4 5

RWD

3 4 7

1 3 4

FWD 1 5 6

3 5 8

Table 5.3: Degrees of Freedom Corresponding to each Complete Model

_________________________________________________________________________________ 112

Chapter 6

As described into the former chapters, numerous equations are required to develop a

complete vehicle model and study the principal characteristics about vehicle dynamics.

Obviously, the decision about how to go into details rests entyrely on the discretion of

the research worker. In fact, it always happens that the choice about the details is

imposed due to the final goal of the research, and for this reason, one does not need to

model the complete physical system, only part of it. In this section we will introduce the

simple model, previously discussed, in order to give a complete vision about the

principal characteristics of longitudinal and transversal behaviour of the vehicle. Thus,

the general characteristics of vehicle, will be implemented in Simulink/Matlab

environment.

In order to analyze the dynamic characteristics of the vehicle and to study its

performance, a computer simulation model of the vehicle system, using the

Matlab/Simulink computer software, has been developed.

In fact, this section describes the Matlab/Simulink model that was implemented.

Simulink is a software package for modelling, simulating, and analyzing dynamical

systems in general.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 113

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

The software, implemented runs under Matlab, a mathematical workshop. Simulink and

Matlab are available from the MathWorks, Inc. Simulink provides a graphical user

interface for building models as block diagrams.

The graphical interface is popular for developing dynamical models for many fields,

such as electronics, hydraulics, chemistry, and many others.

Simulink is not particularly useful for building equation sets for complex mechanical

3D systems. However, it includes S-functions (system functions) to augment and extend

the building blocks in SIMULINK to include arbitrary complex systems.

The S-function appears in a SIMULINK model as a block in the block diagram. The

mathematical behaviour of S-functions can be defined either as a MATLAB M-file, or

as an executable piece of object code in the form of a DLL (dynamic link library)

obtained by compiling C or FORTRAN source code. Such executable functions are

called MEX files (where the EX stands for executable). The S-functions can be loaded

and run by SIMULINK. The simulations can be run from within SIMULINK, using the

SIMULINK integrators and the SIMULINK environment for setting control inputs to

the vehicle model.

The simulation model, illustrated in Figure 6.1, includes many sub-models, some of that

will simulate the powertrain, other the lateral motion of the vehicle, and others the tyre

behaviour.

The green and yellow blocks on the right, named Vehicle Dynamics and Tyre

Model represent the final part of the vehicle modelling: the dynamics behaviour of the

chassis, vehicle inertia, the wheels, and their coupling to the road.

All the other subsystems in the model represent input that control the former or outputs

that measure its behaviour.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 114

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

Driver Behaviour

Engine Model

Throttle Variation

Torque Converter

Vehicle Dynamics

Tyre Model

The following sections explain these subsystems in greater details, recalling each time

the corresponding name of the block.

The easy driver model, presented in Figure 6.2, is a package for simulating and

analyzing how the vehicle responds dynamically to inputs from the driver and the

environment (road and wind but for us under driver control us an user). It provides the

same types of output that might be measured with physical test involving instrumented

_________________________________________________________________________________ 115

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

vehicles (as will be the case for the validation test). The aim of this section is to provide

information on the technical aspects of the simulations.

As cited into Chapter 4, modelling the powertrain requires good knowledge of the

involved components and their physic. It is remembered the division modelling into

three parts, Engine Model and Throttle Variation Model and Torque Converter Model,

including torque converter model.

The characteristic curve of an internal combustion engine defines the torque supplied as

function of engine speed ne and throttle opening . The former is regulated by the driver

behaviour model, assuming values between zero and one.

The Simulink block Engine Model, first element of the complete vehicle model is

shown in Figure 6.3. It should be noted that this block is called MISO (Multi-Input-

Single-Output) because, during the simulation, for a fixed value of the engine speed and

throttle opening, it gives the value of the corresponding engine torque.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 116

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

From this, we obtain the subsystem shown in Figure 6.4. In this former block a Look

up table 2D was used. It gives the interpolation points in the engine map; so, Tables

6.1, and 6.2 show the functional description of this block.

Throttle

Matrix value assumed by the driver tout 1 %

Schedule

Instantaneous value assumed by the engine

Engine Speed tout 1 rpm

speed

Table 6.1: Input of the Engine Model.

Engine torque value of needed to integrate

Engine Torque tout 1

the state equation

Table 6.2: Output of the Engine Model.

The next subsystem in the powertrain is the driveline, in this case an automated manual

transmission, driveshaft, wheels and chassis. Actually, the transmission has three

working states: engaged, disengaged and during engagement/disengagement.

When the transmission is engaged the engine power is transferred to the wheels via a

fixed gear ratio. On the other hand, when the transmission is de-coupled the rotational

parts in engine run without transferring tractive effort to the wheels.

In this work, we have designed a simple Torque Converter model to simulate the gear

change, as shown in Table 6.3:

_________________________________________________________________________________ 117

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

Acceleration Deceleration

1-2 5-4

2-3 4-3

3-4 3-2

4-5 2-1

Steady speed Arrest

manoeuvreing we are using. To do this, we need a special block, called Throttle

Variation, shown in Figure 6.5.

In following Tables 6.4, 6.5, and 6.6 we have the functional description, with reference

to the Function Fcn(u), Derivate Computation, where tout assumes values depending on

the simulation time.

Also, we will illustrate the corresponding subsystem of this model, as shown in Figure

6.5.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 118

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

Table 6.4: Input of the Throttle Variation Model

F(u)

Actual and Old Throttle /

Variable needed to simulate the gear-change

Slope Throttle tout 1

manoeuvreing

Table 6.6: Output of the Throttle Variation Model

Depending on the value assumed by Slope Throttle, it should have the corresponding

gear change. This logic disposition is dictated from the S-Function,

gear_box_change, included in Torque Converter model, explained into section.

As mentioned previously, the power-torque-speed characteristics of the internal

combustion engine are not suited for direct vehicle propulsion. Transmission, therefore,

is required to provide the vehicle with tractive effort speed characteristics that will

satisfy the load demands under various operating conditions.

The term transmission includes all the systems or subsystems used for transmitting

the engine power to the driven wheels or sprockets. There are two common types of

transmission with a torque converter: the manual gear transmission, and the automatic

transmission with a torque converter. Other types of transmission such as the continuous

variable transmission (CVT) and the hydrostatic transmission are also used.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 119

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

engine speed. These two limits are imposed arbitrarily setting a range between

maximum and minimum number of revolutions. In this case, the higher limit to change-

up gear (acceleration) is 5000 rpm and the lower one to change-down gear

(deceleration) is 2000 rpm.

The Torque Converter model, shown in Figure 6.7, works according to an S-Function,

called gear_box_change, and are included in Appendix B.

In the following Tables 6.7, 6.8, and 6.9 a description functionally was shown.

Therefore, the corresponding subsystem of this model is illustrated in Figure 6.8.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 120

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

However, as shown in the previous subsystem, we have two main parts: the Switch

block and Gear Selector block. The first one is indispensable to give the initial

condition corresponding to start in 1st gear. On the other hand, the other block recalls

the S-Function, as shown in Figure 6.8.

Slope Throttle Slope Value assumed by Throttle tout1 /

Instantaneous value assumed by Engine

Engine Speed tout1 /

Speed

Table 6.7: Input of the Torque Converter Model

/

New Gear Value of new gear number tout1

Table 6.9: Output of the Torque Converter Model

_________________________________________________________________________________ 121

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

The Vehicle Dynamics model, Figure 6.10, is divided into two parts:

Driveline Model;

Lateral Model.

In the following sections, all the subsystems will be illustrated.

This easy model can be considered as the latter link of the chain, namely Longitudinal

Vehicle Dynamics.

The equation of motion is a function of time-varying quantities that characteristic curve

of an internal combustion engine defines the torque supplied as function of engine speed

ne and throttle opening that is as function of a parameter able to show how much the

throttle should be opened. In fact, as known, the throttle opening is proportional to the

mass flow rate of air.

The throttle opening assumes included values between 0, section completely closed and

1 (or percentage value) for fully opening.

Particularly attention may be given to the Memory block, Figure 6.22, which contains

the condition concerning the velocity of the wheels constant during the gear-change

manoeuvreing. In fact, during an unitary step of simulation, when the gear has engaged

the simulation is stopped artificially and the rotational velocity of the wheels is imposed

to be constant. All these manoeuvreings are controlled by the variable trigger, which

_________________________________________________________________________________ 122

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

gives the null value, when the gear number is constant, and unitary value during the

change-gear. To have the graphical visualization see Figure 6.17.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 123

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________ 124

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________ 125

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

In following section the lateral dynamics system (only FWD one) in Matlab/Simulink

environment will be illustrated.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 126

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________ 127

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

In order to have more simplicity the tyre model is subdivided into two parts:

Longitudinal and normal behaviour;

Lateral behaviour.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 128

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

Therefore, the blocks are shown separately, dividend the normal and longitudinal forces

at the wheels and the lateral ones. One can note that changing the tyre model concerning

the lateral behaviour, the longitudinal and normal behaviour does not change.

In the following section, the former one is illustrated; see Figures 6.30, 6.31, 6.32,

6.322, 6.34, and 6.35.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 129

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________ 130

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

In analogy the lateral behaviour is configured as shown in Figures 6.36 and 6.37.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 131

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

Figure 6.37: Lateral Front and Rear Forces subsystem (Tyre Model).

The Vehicle Driving Simulator is a simple sub-model implemented in the Driver-Block.

It is only an physical interface between the human driver and the vehicle complete

model.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 132

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

From now on the VDS block was running on a 1.39 GHz AMD Atlon-based computer

while the driving scene was presented on a 15-inch monitor. A more powerful computer

could be useful in order to simulate the behaviour of the model not in real time,

without delays due to the complete integration of the mathematical equations.

The physical configuration of the simulator consist of:

Seat

Steer system

Monitor

Accelerator and brake pedal (the latter is not used)

The whole elements, shown in Figure 6.37, such as the steer and accelerator pedal have

been added to the PC to reproduced with startling realism the physical environment of a

typical vehicle.

The VDS simulator software is configured to represent the control/response

characteristics typical of a real vehicle. In fact, step for step the differential equations of

motion were integrating.

Obviously, the graphical aspect was take into account. The vehicle was represented by a

single point and the trajectory was just a single line.

Even so the model represents with good approximation the real system, according to the

whole hypothesis made.

The bock used to link the human driver to the Simulink/Matlab model is a Virtual

Reality Toolbox, as shown in Figure 6.38.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 133

Simulink Environment Model____________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________________ 134

Chapter 7

Once the model is constructed it must be verified with as much information from the

real system as possible. This process is known as validation. The most common

method to evaluate the reaction of the model to measured data and compare it with

actual values. For this reason, this chapter begins with our approach to the validation of

the model and all connected problems concerning the measure errors. In the foregoing

chapters, we used a simplified mathematical model of the complete vehicle to develop

some basic concepts, and then we conclude with test results on real vehicles.

The simulation is a method used to verify a model which represents the behaviour of a

physical system. Therefore, a validation phase is required, during which the results of

the model will come compared with the experimental data.

As described into Chapter 2, the simulators are much utilized in all industrial fields such

as aero spatial, aeronautic, motor and many others, in order to understand the physical

behaviour of a system. In some applications user is constrained to work with a simulator

model, because there is no other way to study the phenomenon, such as the evolution of

the universe, the meteorological and seismic ones.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 135

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

The results obtained by the simulations, such as the tendency of the variables, can be

visualized graphically, by animation software (2D or 3D), in order to represents the

evolution of the system during the time.

The construction of a model often involves many simplifications through which the

outputs of the model deviate to a greater or lesser extent from the real values. Before

proceeding to the real validation, some responses could be interesting, to understand

completely the following development:

Do the model outputs correspond well enough to the measured data?

Is the model suitable for the purpose for which it was constructed?

The more data are available from the real system, the better the above questions can be

responded. A model can in general be considered validated when, following evaluation

with suitable validation data, it satisfies the requirements for which it was constructed.

Before the validation, one must clearly know which purpose the model is to be put to,

which outputs must be precisely modeled, and where certain errors can be accepted.

Once the model will result true we will be arrived to the last stage of the modelling.

Opposite a cut-off stage for the model will be required.

Generally, the principle of validation of the model consists to compare the output

variables of the model with the estimations measured experimentally. Initially, to do

this, it is necessary to fix rich input variables and so to realize a test protocol. The

principal aim of the test execution is the acquisition of the data, which will come used to

validate the model.

Some sensors will have to fix on the working system in order to measure the physical

variables. These variables will be subject to measurement errors and, for this reason, it

will be necessary an arrangement stage.

To realize the validation of a model, the choice about the working signal is very

important. It is necessary that these signals should have much information in order to

_________________________________________________________________________________ 136

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

investigate on a large functioning field of the vehicle. For this reason, the working

signal must be continuous. Generally, the ideal signal to validate all the models is the

white noise.

Unluckily, this kind of signal often is not available. The binary signal which has similar

characteristics to the white noise is available. This kind of signal is a deterministic one

with a rich frequency band.

The different signals used will have to allow the validation of the model in all working

regimes, transient or steady-state. The choice about the working signals influence the

tests made. The definition of the test protocol is very important to validate the

mathematical model. It allows realizing the suitable tests that we have to analyze.

In the literature many norms (ISO), [30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36] are available for

different applications. In the section 7.2.5, the discussion about the tests used for our

application will be shown.

The description of the norms ISO presents a particular structure constituted by different

specifications:

Application data;

Instrumentation (standard or special);

Installation of the sensors;

Tests conditions;

Analysis and presentation of the tests.

All this information will have to be planned during the time, in order to understand what

we have to do before, during and after the tests. The basis notions, which have to be

respectful, are described in the theory about the experience plane [37, 38].

Before making all the tests, one should question oneself about the variables to be

measured for the current application. Obviously, the choice about the measure variables

influences the typology of the mechanical sensors, but the latter are only a link of the

complete measure chain, as shown in Figure 7.1.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 137

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

Physical

Phenomenon

Conditioner of Acquisition Acquisition

Sensors signal Equipment Unit

According to the section 7.2.8, all the measures will have some errors. These will be a

different nature: typical errors of the measure chain, errors links with the noises, and

many others.

The sensors are the first link of the measure chain. The principal role of a sensor is to

translate a physical quantity into another one, generally electrical, and directly

proportional to the quantity measured.

Currently, many sensors exist according to various industrial applications [39, 40, 41,

42]. We will relate in the sections 7.2.4 and 7.2.5 to the sensors required for our

application. Principally, this application will regard the acceleration sensor, linear

velocity, angular velocity (girometers), and the angular displacement.

Continuing along the acquisition chain we find an electronic instrument, called

Conditioner of signal. This instrument is always present each time we have a sensor and

for each one. They will serve us as a linkage between the sensor block and the next

block. Among many functions which this instrument has, the most important is the

amplification of the signal, the linearization of the sensor into its functioning field, the

isolation of the sensor away from the measure chain, the filtering signal, and the

alimentation of the sensors eventually.

Actually, the measure chains most used, and those used in our application, is numerical

type. These work on acquisition unit, equipped with schedules able to measure all the

electrical quantities. These particular schedules guarantee the amplification of the

signal, the arrangement about the input and output quantity, the sampling, and the

conversion analogical/numeric of the measure.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 138

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

The acquisition unit serves to manipulate all the measure chain from a PC in order to

store the acquired data on a memory support. Finally, the software is able to pilot the

acquisition chain according with specified rules. The last element of the measure chain

is the connection between the different elements with the cables. This aspect is very

important because it could verify same disturbances on account of interferences.

Today the multiplication technique is used frequently. This kind of connection is able to

link many blocks with only one common cable. Particularly, for this application the

CAN control Area Network has been used. In this way the wiring is reduced to the

minimum.

To validate a mathematical model, an experimental stage is required in order to evaluate

all variables. Therefore, these will have to be compared with the estimates of our model.

In our case, some tests on a track have been performed with a suitably-equipped test

vehicle.

Previously, we needed to decide the necessary instruments, such as the sensors, the

acquisition system and all the components for the measure chain.First, for a good

validation of our models, we need to choose correct practice signals to supply the large

functioning of the vehicle. Therefore, we are required to define a test protocol which

explains the dynamic manoeuvreing in terms of external conditions and other factors.

Finally, the results obtained will be manipulated to develop their own meaning.

To study the dynamics problems, shown in previous chapters, it was decided to use, like

the test vehicle, Renault Mgane Coup 16V 150 hp equipped with different sensors

and an acquisition system AUTOBOX; see Figure 7.2.

To validate the mathematical model, tests on a track have been performed with a

suitably-equipped test vehicle. Thus, prior to this study, the necessary instrumentation

as well as the acquisition system had to be defined. A particular study on the excitation

_________________________________________________________________________________ 139

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

signals was carried out to allow them to excite a very wide frequency band of the

vehicle (including critical driving situations).

Distant from the centre of gravity there are two accelerometers which are able to

measure the longitudinal and transversal acceleration. This kind of sensor works with

piezoresistivity propriety. The rotational speed about the vertical spin axis of the

vehicle, z-axis (yaw rate), Figure 7.3 (a), was measured with a gyrometer. The

steering angle is measured by a potentiometer; see Figure 7.3 (b).

(a) (b)

Figure 7.3: Instrumentation of the Test Vehicle

_________________________________________________________________________________ 140

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

The longitudinal and transversal speeds are measured by an optical intermediate sensor

DATRON; see again Figure 7.2. This last instrument is very expensive, costing just

under ten thousand euros for one. An interesting alternative instrument for using this

model [42] is based on artificial intelligence techniques working through Fuzzy Logic.

In order to carry out validation, test drives were carried out with an experimental

vehicle, and the following variables recorded:

Throttle opening u longitudinal velocity

Steering angle ax acceleration in x-direction

ay acceleration in y-direction

r yaw rate

Table 7.1: Inputs and Outputs of the Validation Model

The validation model calculates, from the inputs and , the outputs u, ax, ay, and r, so

that a direct comparison can be carried out between the model and experimental data.

Thus, in order to describe the functioning of the vehicle, two tests have been executed.

These tests include the principal driving characteristics which could show the mean

critical conditions.

In normal driving conditions, it is possible to take in account the easier tyre model

known, linear one. There are many tests which are able to investigate the behaviour of

the vehicle, [30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36]. For example, the braking test is able to study

the longitudinal behaviour.

Instead, the manoeuvres about angular dynamics can show the principal characteristic

of the transversal behaviour, the braking test in band will be able to study the lateral

behaviour in transient conditions. Last, the sinusoidal test can be able to study the

response for frequency of the vehicle model.

According to Figure 7.3, two kind of experimental tests have been performed. Precisely,

these tests regard the bands 3 and 7. Referring to the track, clockwise sense, the second

_________________________________________________________________________________ 141

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

curve had run with higher velocity in owing to its radius of curvature which was

smaller. Opposite means for the 7th band, that its excessive bend limits the fast

manoeuvreing. As well, the faster is characterized by an high deceleration.

The acquisition data which comes from the experimental tests can not be utilized

directly. In fact, it is necessary to choose the frequency of measures sampling, in this

case it is 50 Hz. This frequency corresponds to the same one utilized by the acquisition

system which works on the test vehicle (Dspace/RT-LAB). In this way, the frequencies

of the system can be held.

Every acquisition system has tabulation in order to store the data. Once known these

latter we need to traduce this information in order to utilize it in our ambient work

(Matlab/Simulink). However, all the measurements are suffering from a lot of noises,

such as vibrations due to the motion of the vehicle, and noises due to mechanical origin

(rigid parts moving), and finally electrical noises which disturb the acquisition field.

For all these reasons a specific filter can be used. A good arrangement to improve the

ratio signal/noises can be obtained with a filtering of 10 Hz by a third order Low-Pass

filter.

Opposite, another kind of noise could be a malfunctioning of the instruments, of the

acquisition system, such as slip and setting.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 142

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

Finally, all the measure chain can be exposed to many perturbations. Meanly, these

perturbations can be summarized in the following factors:

No accuracy during the assembly and balancing of the sensors;

DATRON sensor can be equipped in wrong way because its specifications do

not give exactly the working limit, such as the time response and many other

factors.

During the validation tests, some measurement problems have been presented, such as

problem af estimation for the velocity sensor (DATRON) and problem to initialize the

files while the acquisition system was beginning.

Some checks can be made to set completely all the sensor. For example, for the

accelerometer varying around 90 and so verifying that the measure corresponds with

the acceleration of gravity. For the sensor to be able to measure the steering angle, it is

possible to make a completely round about its spin axis in order to verify if the measure

is equal to 2 rad.

The next step, before comparing the experimental data and the simulation results, is to

rearrange the values assumed by the variable. Two filter-values for the throttle opening

have been made. First, according to the values bigger than full opening and the second

about values smaller than zero.

Into the following sentences it will be reported the cycles (Matlab/Simulink) used to

clean the final vectors before the validation graphs, where the letter T means throttle

opening [%].

Filter 1 Filter 2

% Control about values bigger than 100% % Control about values negative.

if T_tot(x)>100 if T_tot(x)<0

disp('Filter 1') disp('Filter 2')

T_tot(x)=100; T_tot(x)=0;

end end

end end

_________________________________________________________________________________ 143

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

In the following section, many graphs, Figure 7.5 to 7.24, will illustrate the comparison

of the experimental data and the simulation data. That means all the following diagrams

will show some differences between the data measured by the sensors and the results of

the mathematical model. The latter includes the front and rear wheel drive (FWD-

RWD). One may note that the FWD model presents lots resolution difficulty that the

rear one. Particularly, as illustrated FWD with non-linear tyre model is 8 D.O.F.

because the lateral forces depend by the load transfer, so to obtain the dynamic solution

it is required solving all the blocks model. The front traction has more interaction with

the longitudinal model than the rear model, which contains only the velocity

longitudinal as linkage.

Therefore, the simulated with FWD model in the 3th and 7th turn is illustrated, Figures

7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, and 7.10.

First, the simulations carried out in the 3th curve are characterized by discordance in

terms of velocity. In fact, this comes from a transient problem. During the first part of

the throttle opening curve, it is possible to note a physical discordance between the

throttle opening and the longitudinal velocity. In fact, the velocity signal measured by

the sensor was different from that simulated; physically, this happens because the

vehicle had its velocity, due to the inertia forces. The theoretical model cannot

reproduce this phenomenon; therefore, in corresponding to a throttle opening null, there

is a velocity smaller than that measured. The incongruence could be annulled operating

a set up on the velocity of vehicle that means to begin to store data from a steady state

of the speed and so operate the tests manoeuvres.

The second difference could come from an oscillating measure of the longitudinal

acceleration which is, obviously, particularly stable in the model. In fact, in the model

the vibration noises are neglected.

Moreover, some differences, concerning the evaluation of inertia in the lateral model,

can be visualized. It is very clear for the non-linear tyre model because it is not able to

reproduce very well the real behaviour of the automobile. For this reason more

concordance could be obtained with the Pacejka model.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 144

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

In 7th curve, according to the problem concerning the transient problem, shown in the

former sentence, the corresponding between the experimental data and simulation

results is sufficiently good. Only one problem is discovered, concerning the lateral

behaviour. In fact, while the steering angle presents a decreasing trend, in corresponding

of the time step 148, 232 and 403 seconds, the yaw rate and the lateral acceleration do

not have the same behaviour. Physically, this incongruence could come from imperfect

measurements. Taking care to the simulations 2, 3 and 5, there is not a good accordance

of the yawing rate for the fixed steering angle. In fact, there is a simple delay in terms of

the response. Probably, because the flexibility of the body is always present in realty.

Opposite in the model, hypnotizing the vehicle as a rigid body, the response in

transversal terms is instantaneous.

100 100

measured

Steering Angle [deg]

simulated 50

Throttle [%]

50

0

0

-50

measured

-50 -100 simulated

18 20 22 24 26 18 20 22 24 26

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

20 1

measured

Yawing Rate [rad/s]

18 simulated

0.5

16

0

14

12 -0.5

18 20 22 24 26 18 20 22 24 26

measured time [s] time [s]

Lateral Acceleration [m/s 2]

4 simulated 10

2 5

0 0

-2 -5

measured

-4 -10 simulated l tire

18 20 22 24 26 18 20

simulated 22tire

l-d 24 26

time [s] time

simulated [s] tire

non-l-d

_________________________________________________________________________________ 145

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

150 200

measured

100 simulated

Throttle [%]

100

50

0

0

measured

-50 -100 simulated

186 188 190 192 194 196 186 188 190 192 194 196

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

22 1

measured

20 simulated

0.5

18

0

16

14 -0.5

186 188 190 192 194 196 186 188 190 192 194 196

time [s] time [s]

5 20

10

0

0

measured measured

simulated simulated l tire

-5 -10

186 188 190 192 194 196 186 188 190

simulated l-d tire 192 194 196

time [s] time [s]tire

simulated non-l-d

40 100

measured

Steering Angle [deg]

simulated 50

Throttle [%]

20

0

0

-50

measured

-20 -100 simulated

58 60 62 64 66 58 60 62 64 66

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

26 0.5

Yawing Rate [rad/s]

24

0

22

measured

simulated

20 -0.5

58 60 62 64 66 58 60 62 64 66

time [s] time [s]

Lateral Acceleration [m/s 2]

2 10

measured

simulated 5

0

0

-2

-5

-4 -10 measured

58 60 62 64 66 58 60 62 64 66

simulated l tire

time [s] time [s] l-d tire

simulated

simulated non-l-d tire

_________________________________________________________________________________ 146

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

30 100

measured

20 simulated

Throttle [%]

50

10

0

0

measured

-10 -50 simulated

310 312 314 316 318 310 312 314 316 318

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

28 0.4

measured

26 simulated 0.2

24 0

22 -0.2

20 -0.4

310 312 314 316 318 310 312 314 316 318

time [s] time [s]

2 10

5

0

0

-2

-5

measured

simulated measured

-4 -10

310 312 314 316 318 310 312 simulated

314 l tire

316 318

time [s] simulated

time [s] l-d tire

simulated non-l-d tire

40 60

Steering Angle [deg]

40

Throttle [%]

20

20

0

0

measured measured

-20 simulated -20 simulated

480 482 484 486 488 480 482 484 486 488

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

28 0.4

measured

Yawing Rate [rad/s]

26 simulated 0.2

24 0

22 -0.2

20 -0.4

480 482 484 486 488 480 482 484 486 488

time [s] time [s]

Lateral Acceleration [m/s 2]

1 20

0

10

-1

0

-2

measured

simulated measured

-3 -10 simulated l tire

480 482 484 486 488 480 482 484 486 488

simulated l-d tire

time [s] time [s]

simulated non-l-d tire

_________________________________________________________________________________ 147

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

In the following section the simulation with RWD model is carried out. One has to note

that the longitudinal behaviour is always independent by the lateral one. Opposite is not

right. For this reason, even though the lateral model could not reproduce very well the

real data, the longitudinal model could have a good accordance.

100 100

measured

Steering Angle [deg]

simulated 50

Throttle [%]

50

0

0

-50

measured

-50 -100 simulated

18 20 22 24 26 18 20 22 24 26

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

20 1

measured

Yawing Rate [rad/s]

18 simulated

0.5

16

0

14

12 -0.5

18 20 22 24 26 18 20 22 24 26

time [s] time [s]

measured

Lateral Acceleration [m/s 2]

4 10

simulated

2 5

0 0

-2 -5

measured

-4 -10 simulated l tire

18 20 22 24 26 18 20simulated22l-d tire 24 26

time [s] timenon-l-d

simulated [s] tire

_________________________________________________________________________________ 148

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

150 200

measured

100 simulated

Throttle [%]

100

50

0

0

measured

-50 -100 simulated

102 104 106 108 110 112 102 104 106 108 110 112

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

25 1

measured

simulated

20 0.5

15 0

10 -0.5

102 104 106 108 110 112 102 104 106 108 110 112

time [s] time [s]

4 measured 10

simulated

2 5

0 0

-2 -5 measured

simulated l tire

-4 -10 simulated l-d tire

102 104 106 108 110 112 102 simulated

104 106 tire108

non-l-d 110 112

time [s] time [s]

150 200

measured

Steering Angle [deg]

100 simulated

Throttle [%]

100

50

0

0

measured

-50 -100 simulated

102 104 106 108 110 112 102 104 106 108 110 112

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

25 1

measured

Yawing Rate [rad/s]

simulated

20 0.5

15 0

10 -0.5

102 104 106 108 110 112 102 104 106 108 110 112

time [s] time [s]

Lateral Acceleration [m/s 2]

4 measured 10

simulated

2 5

0 0

-2 -5 measured

simulated l tire

-4 -10 simulated l-d tire

102 104 106 108 110 112 102 simulated

104 106 tire108

non-l-d 110 112

time [s] time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 149

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

150 200

measured

100 simulated

Throttle [%]

100

50

0

0

measured

-50 -100 simulated

186 188 190 192 194 196 186 188 190 192 194 196

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

22 1

measured

20 simulated

0.5

18

0

16

14 -0.5

186 188 190 192 194 196 186 188 190 192 194 196

time [s] time [s]

5 10

0 0

measured

-5 simulated l tire

measured simulated l-d tire

simulated simulated non-l-d tire

-5 -10

186 188 190 192 194 196 186 188 190 192 194 196

time [s] time [s]

150 200

measured

Steering Angle [deg]

100 simulated

Throttle [%]

100

50

0

0

measured

-50 -100 simulated

270 272 274 276 278 280 270 272 274 276 278 280

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

30 1

Yawing Rate [rad/s]

20 0.5

10 0

measured

0 simulated -0.5

270 272 274 276 278 280 270 272 274 276 278 280

time [s] time [s]

Lateral Acceleration [m/s 2]

5 10

5

0

0

-5

-5 measured

measured

simulated l tire

simulated

-10 -10 simulated l-d tire

270 272 274 276 278 280 270 272 274 276 278 280

simulated non-l-d tire

time [s] time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 150

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

100 measured 150

simulated

100

Throttle [%]

50

50

0

0

measured

-50 -50 simulated

356 358 360 362 364 366 356 358 360 362 364 366

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

25 0.6

measured

20 simulated 0.4

15 0.2

10 0

5 -0.2

356 358 360 362 364 366 356 358 360 362 364 366

time [s] time [s]

5 10

5

0

0

measured

simulated measured

-5 -5 simulated

356 358 360 362 364 366 356 358 360 l tire 362 364 366

simulated l-d tire

time [s] time [s]

simulated non-l-d tire

100 200

measured

Steering Angle [deg]

simulated

Throttle [%]

50 100

0 0

measured

-50 -100 simulated

440 442 444 446 448 450 440 442 444 446 448 450

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

25 1

measured

Yawing Rate [rad/s]

20 simulated

0.5

15

0

10

5 -0.5

440 442 444 446 448 450 440 442 444 446 448 450

time [s] time [s]

Lateral Acceleration [m/s 2]

5 10

0 0

-5 measured

simulated l tire

measured simulated l-d tire

-5 -10

440 442 444 446 448 simulated

450 440 442 444non-l-d

simulated 446

tire 448 450

time [s] time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 151

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

100 200

measured

simulated

Throttle [%]

50 100

0 0

measured

-50 -100 simulated

524 526 528 530 532 534 524 526 528 530 532 534

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

25 0.5

measured

20 simulated

15 0

10

5 -0.5

524 526 528 530 532 534 524 526 528 530 532 534

time [s] time [s]

5 10

measured

simulated

5

0

0

measured

-5 -5 simulated l tire

524 526 528 530 532 534 524 526 528

simulated l-d tire 530 532 534

time [s] time [s]tire

simulated non-l-d

40 100

measured

Steering Angle [deg]

simulated 50

Throttle [%]

20

0

0

-50

measured

-20 -100 simulated

58 60 62 64 66 58 60 62 64 66

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

26 0.5

Yawing Rate [rad/s]

24

0

22

measured

simulated

20 -0.5

58 60 62 64 66 58 60 62 64 66

time [s] time [s]

Lateral Acceleration [m/s 2]

2 10

measured

simulated 5

0

0

-2

-5

measured

-4 -10 simulated l tire

58 60 62 64 66 58 60simulated62

l-d tire 64 66

time [s] timenon-l-d

simulated [s] tire

_________________________________________________________________________________ 152

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

40 100

0

Throttle [%]

20

-100

0

-200

measured measured

-20 simulated -300 simulated

142 144 146 148 150 142 144 146 148 150

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

26 1

25

0

24

-1

23

measured

simulated

22 -2

142 144 146 148 150 142 144 146 148 150

time [s] time [s]

2 20

0

0

-20

measured

-2

-40 simulated l tire

measured simulated l-d tire

simulated simulated non-l-d tire

-4 -60

142 144 146 148 150 142 144 146 148 150

time [s] time [s]

60 200

Steering Angle [deg]

40 0

Throttle [%]

20 -200

0 -400

measured measured

-20 simulated -600 simulated

226 228 230 232 234 226 228 230 232 234

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

26 2

Yawing Rate [rad/s]

24 0

22 -2

measured

simulated

20 -4

226 228 230 232 234 226 228 230 232 234

time [s] time [s]

Lateral Acceleration [m/s 2]

2 50

0 0

measured

-2 -50

simulated l tire

measured simulated l-d tire

simulated simulated non-l-d tire

-4 -100

226 228 230 232 234 226 228 230 232 234

time [s] time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 153

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

30 100

measured

20 simulated

Throttle [%]

50

10

0

0

measured

-10 -50 simulated

310 312 314 316 318 310 312 314 316 318

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

28 0.6

measured

26 simulated 0.4

24 0.2

22 0

20 -0.2

310 312 314 316 318 310 312 314 316 318

time [s] time [s]

2 10

0 5

-2 0

measured

simulated

-4 -5 measured

310 312 314 316 318 310 312 314 316 318

simulated l tire

time [s] time [s]

simulated l-d tire

simulated non-l-d tire

60 200

measured

Steering Angle [deg]

40 simulated 0

Throttle [%]

20 -200

0 -400

measured

-20 -600 simulated

398 400 402 404 406 398 400 402 404 406

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

30 2

measured

Yawing Rate [rad/s]

simulated

25 0

20 -2

15 -4

398 400 402 404 406 398 400 402 404 406

time [s] time [s]

Lateral Acceleration [m/s 2]

2 50

measured

simulated

0 0

-2 -50

measured

simulated l tire

-4 -100 simulated l-d tire

398 400 402 404 406 398 400 402 404 406

simulated non-l-d tire

time [s] time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 154

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

40 60

40

Throttle [%]

20

20

0

0

measured measured

-20 simulated -20 simulated

480 482 484 486 488 480 482 484 486 488

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

28 0.6

measured

26 simulated 0.4

24 0.2

22 0

20 -0.2

480 482 484 486 488 480 482 484 486 488

time [s] time [s]

1 10

0

5

-1

0

-2

measured

simulated measured

-3 -5

480 482 484 486 488 480 482 484 simulated

486l tire 488

time [s] simulated l-d tire

time [s]

simulated non-l-d tire

40 100

Steering Angle [deg]

Throttle [%]

20 0

0 -100

measured measured

simulated simulated

-20 -200

566 568 570 572 574 566 568 570 572 574

time [s] time [s]

Longitudinal Acceleration [m/s 2] Longitudinal Velocity [m/s]

28 0.5

Yawing Rate [rad/s]

0

26

-0.5

24

-1

measured

simulated

22 -1.5

566 568 570 572 574 566 568 570 572 574

time [s] time [s]

Lateral Acceleration [m/s 2]

2 10

0

0

-10

-2 measured

-20

measured simulated l tire

simulated simulated l-d tire

-4 -30

566 568 570 572 574 566 simulated

568 non-l-d570tire 572 574

time [s] time [s]

_________________________________________________________________________________ 155

Validation of the Vehicle Model___________________________________________________________

Concluding, one can say that the simulated longitudinal dynamics corresponds very

well to the measured data. Again the calculated values follow the measured data very

well. The longitudinal velocity is also well reproduced.

The noise about the longitudinal acceleration, which according to the measured data is

due to some extent dynamics, is simulated in the model as semi-constant value. This

could be different if oscillatory phenomena would have considered.

Similarly good results are given for the simulated lateral dynamics which shows only

small errors for the acceleration variable

In summary one can say that with sufficient excitation of the respective dynamics, the

longitudinal and lateral dynamics were very well reproduced.

The simulation model has proved itself suitable for calculation of the relevant drive

dynamics variables given steering angle and throttle opening.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 156

Chapter 8

This work has proposed some foundation of mathematics, analytical methods, and

design strategies necessary to describe some characteristics of an automobile, so

exploitable for any application. Although the mathematics and simulations presented

herein can prove an useful intuitive understanding of generalized performance and

control characteristics of the vehicle. Understanding the nature of what has been done

here is essential in any future development of a vehicle simulation, even if a simple

modelling has been proposed . Having said this, we can now consider some of the

natural spin-offs of this research that must be considered in any future development

efforts.

8.1 Conclusion

One of the objectives of this work has been to develop a vehicle model that could be

used to predict the dynamics for steering and throttle regulation manoeuvres. The

dynamics for the complete vehicle have been presented but with many assumptions. In

fact, in this study only a non linear function for the lateral forces at the tyres has been

constructed. For all, the principal characteristics of the vehicle dynamics have been

performed.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 157

Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research_______________________________________

One of the most important aspects of a computational study is its practical usefulness. In

other words, how the study can be used by other engineers and researchers. This study

can be helpful in many ways. First and foremost, it can be used as a basis for future

studies of optimization concepts applied to vehicle dynamics. This study may be

referenced to show that optimal paths can be generated by setting up the constrained

optimization problem using the unconstrained optimization algorithm of Matlab,

fmins.

Further, this research can be used as a preliminary study for the development of a new

tyre testing procedure. An accelerated tyre wear test path can be generated using the

tyre force maximization optimization routine. Often time, tyre manufacturers want to

compare the wear of different tyre constructions. By implementing this concept along

with a feedback steering controller, an automated testing procedure can be developed to

make tyre wear testing more efficient and accurate. Test vehicles are subjected to

automatically follow generated paths using the feedback steering controller, augmenting

the ability of the test drivers. Further, automatic testing improves repeatability by

consistently maintaining the same vehicle path while different sets of tyres are being

tested. As such, simulation such as those presented in this study can be used as a tool to

perform comparison tests on different vehicle specifications to determine the effects of

changing a certain parameter on the optimal path of the vehicle.

There are two issues that can be improved upon for this research, computation time and

model prediction accuracy. It is difficult to improve upon both issues at the same time

since they are strictly interrelated. Using a faster processor to perform the optimization

simulation, one can use higher degrees-of-freedom models or more accurate integration

routines, to increase the prediction accuracy.

A more efficient search algorithm can also be used to make the convergence rate of the

simulation faster. Genetics algorithm is a very attractive method to pursue. This method

is relative new to the field of engineering. There have been a few studies on using this

_________________________________________________________________________________ 158

Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research_______________________________________

relatively difficult to understand and even more difficult to implement in the simulation

algorithm.

Finally, a way to increase the speed of the simulation is to write the entyre simulation

program in Matlab script, C or C++ code. This entails efficiently writing loops, matrix

operations, algebraic operations, input/output of files, and other mathematical

manipulations in C or C++. Working into only an environment, such as the

Matlab/Simulink, the computational time could decrease rapidly. In fact, in our

software, mdl-file, we recall during each loop of integration S-function (which are

written in m-file). For this reason the process needs more time to converge.

Unfortunately, in this way we need also to implement a numeric method to solve the

differential equations.

The research presented in this work has convinced us that the single track model is a

good option in the choice-design of the ground vehicles. In fact we have seen a part of

the dynamic performance, for all it was so quite complicated. We have also shown some

of the more significant issues, such as the adherence condition concept, non linear

linkage between the variables (such as it happens in the realty).

In the future an optimization method to vehicle dynamics could be applied to this study,

specifically to generate some optimal paths. In this case, the final goal could be to

minimize travel time, and to maximize tyre forces. Moreover, a parametric study, could

demonstrate the effectiveness of the optimization algorithm. These optimal paths could

be generated using optimization routine, such as the unconstrained optimization

algorithm of Matlab, fmins.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 159

Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research_______________________________________

To improve the computation speed of the optimization routine, a method such as the

parallel processing computation can be used to evaluate the optimization algorithm.

This method is consisted of using the UNIX platform workstation to run two processors

to evaluate the algorithm. This, however, would require some difficulties to implement

the algorithm. This method of computation will increase the speed of obtaining the

optimal solution. Furthermore, with an increase in computation speed, more

complicated vehicle and tyre models can be used.

A further study can be performed to determine the effects of different vehicle and tyre

models. For the vehicle model, other degrees of freedom could be included, rolling

motion, pitching motion, and suspension effects. Obviously, other important dynamic

characteristics, such as the two masses motion have not taken into account. According

to before mathematical developments both could be presented and solved, also to

perform a three-dimensional vehicle and not plane-motion as we made.

As for the tyre model, a more current model can be used such as the Pacjeka tyre model.

This model requires using actual tyre data and fitting it with a form of least square

function.

At this time, according to the former, it may be considered another non linear behaviour

for the tyre model in the longitudinal direction. However, in this case, the solutions

required could be performed only by a numerical methods. Moreover, it should be

investigated in terms of ground slip in that direction.

Another focus of future work is experimental validation of the complete model while it

is moving on a discontinuous terrain, taking into account the vertical dynamics also.

This means taking into account a suspension model in order to have good information

about oscillatory phenomena. As known, these come from to common perturbations

always present at the wheels.

Lastly, include vehicle dynamic controllers such as traction control and yaw control into

the simulation to see the effects of these systems applied to determining an optimal

_________________________________________________________________________________ 160

Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research_______________________________________

algorithms for the ABS concept [44]. In fact, we have suggested the single track

model but a double track model may provide distinct advantages in automatic field [45].

The dynamics for the braking manoeuvres have not been presented. However, it could

be interesting to include a brake model in order to investigate a braking-test in a turn.

Finally, work must be completed on the physical design of the real vehicle, with all its

topics. Many ideas concerning the typical problems of the vehicle have been considered

during this research. We hope that sometime in the future, this little model of the

ground-vehicle family will intrigue engineers and others to the same extent as it made

with the author. We believe it has already made a good start.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 161

Appendix A

%

% Vehicle_Dynamics_data m-file

% Vehicle: Renault Mgane Coup 16V 150 HP

% input: Gas data, Vehicle data

% output: Engine Map

%

%

% GAS DATA %

%

% General data

g = 9.806 ;% [m/s^2] Gravitational Acceleration

% Gas data

r0 = 8315.4 ;% [J kgmole/kg/K] Universal gas Constant

mw = 28.97 ;% [kg/kgmole] Air Molecular Weight

rair = r0/mw ;

pcr = 0.528 ;% [/] Critical Pressure ratio

rk = 1.4 ;% [/] Specific Heats ratio

% Ambient data

pair = 101300 ;% [Pa] Atmospheric Pressure

tair = 300 ;% [K] Ambient Temperature

umid = 50 ;% [%] Relative humidity

rhoair=pair/rair/tair ;% [Kg/m3] Air Density

%

% VEHICLE DATA %

%

% Road data

grade=[0, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10] ;

% Transmission data

etad=.8;

taud = 3.8 ;% dif. gear ratio

etacv=[0.80, 0.91, 0.93, 0.92, 0.95];

taucv=[3.7273,2.0476,1.3214,0.9667,0.7949] ;% JB1 type

% taucv=[3.3636,1.8636,1.3214,0.9667,0.7949]

% taucv=[3.0909,1.8636,1.3214,0.9667,0.7381] ;% JB3 type

% taucv=[3.7273,2.0476,1.3214,0.9714,0.7561] ;% JB5 type

% taucv=[3.3636,1.8636,1.3214,1.0294,0.8205]

% Geometrical data

rr =.300 ;% [m] Rolling Effective Radius

J=1623.8 ;% [kgm^2] Inertia around z axle

L=2.468 ;% [m] Wheelbase Vehicle

L1=0.9552 ;% [m] semi-Wheelbase front Vehicle

L2=L-L1 ;% [m] semi-Wheelbase rear Vehicle

Lsensor=0.30 ;% [m] Distance from rear axle to the sensor position

d=0.25 ;% [m] Relaxation length (or delay length)

ratio_steer=20;

% Tyre data

C1=84085 ;% [Ns/rad] Cornering Stiffness of fornt tyre

C2=87342 ;% [Ns/rad] Cornering Stiffness of rear tyre

mu=.9 ;% [/] Coefficient of road adhesion

h1=0.450 ;% [m] Legth between centre of gravity and ground

h2=h1 ;% [m] Legth between point of application Faero and ground

if(C1*L1<C2*L2)

disp('Understeering Vehicle'); % Understeering/Oversteering Behaviour

else disp('Oversteering Vehicle');

_________________________________________________________________________________ 162

Appendix_____________________________________________________________________________

end

% Rigid driveline

mc=2.8 ;% [kg] Crank Mass

mcr=.3 ;% [kg] Connecting Rod Big End Mass

rc=.03 ;% [m] Rc: Crank Radius

ncyl=4 ;% [/] Cylinder Number

ifw=.3 ;% [kgm^2] Flywheel Inertia

icgi=((mc+mcr))*rc^2*ncyl ;% [kgm^2] Crank Gear Inertia

iengine=icgi+ifw ;% [kgm^2] Total Engine Inertia

iwheel=Ieach_wheel*[(etad)/(taud)]^2 ;% [kgm^2] Equivalent Wheel Inertia

mv_unsprung_front=105 ;% [kg] Unsprung front Mass of Vehicle

mv_unsprung_rear=55 ;% [kg] Unsprung rear Mass of Vehicle

mv=mv_sprung+mv_unsprung_front+mv_unsprung_rear ;% [kg] Total Mass of Vehicle

ichassis=(mv*rr^2)*[(etad)/(taud)]^2 ;% [kgm^2] Equivalent Vehicle Inertia

% Aereodynamics data

cx = .328 ;% [/] Drag Coefficient

Af=1.6 + 0.00056 * (mv-765) ;% [m^2] Frontal Area after J.Y.Wong "Theory of Groung Vehicle"

sez=Af;

% Engine data

thvec=[0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 85 100];

nevec=[0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 5.0 5.4 5.8]*10^3;

engine_map=[ 26.8204 -29.5025 -32.8550 -35.5371 -38.2191 -40.9012 -43.5832 -46.9358 -49.6178 -52.2999 -55.9819;

145.1599 78.4498 56.9934 45.2537 29.5025 19.4448 6.7051 -1.3410 -8.7166 -15.7512 -21.4564;

165.2752 139.4663 119.3509 99.2356 81.8023 69.7331 56.9934 45.2537 32.1845 22.1269 12.0692;

177.0149 175.3328 161.5931 146.8419 129.4086 111.9753 101.9177 89.1780 79.7908 65.3691 56.9934;

177.0149 187.0726 189.0841 185.3905 175.3328 159.5816 149.5239 139.4663 126.7266 115.6574 101.9177;

179.0264 195.4482 196.4597 199.1418 195.4482 185.3905 175.3328 171.6508 156.8996 142.1483 129.4086;

179.0264 199.1418 205.5058 205.5058 205.5058 201.8238 196.4597 189.0841 179.0264 166.9572 51.5355;

179.0264 201.8238 206.5174 209.1994 213.8930 216.5750 213.8930 211.8815 199.1418 187.0726 169.6393;

179.0264 201.8238 209.1994 213.8930 219.2571 219.2571 219.2571 219.2571 209.1994 196.4597 179.0264;

179.0264 201.8238 209.1994 213.8930 219.2571 223.9507 223.9507 223.9507 213.8930 205.5058185.3905

];

figure(1)

omega_engine=0:500:5000;

plot(omega_engine,engine_map,'-')

hold on

title('Engine map')

hold on

xlabel('n_e [rpm]')

ylabel('T_e [N m]')

legend('th=0','th=20%','th=30%','th=40%','th=50%','th=60%','th=70%','th=80%','th=90%','th=100%',0)

figure(2)

omega_engine=0:500:5000;

plot(omega_engine/5000,engine_map/223.9507,'-')

hold on

title('Adimensionless Engine map')

hold on

xlabel('n_e/n_emax [/]')

ylabel('T_e/T_emax [/]')

legend('th=0','th=20%','th=30%','th=40%','th=50%','th=60%','th=70%','th=80%','th=90%','th=100%',0)

%close all

tstep=0.02;

tstop=120;

disp('tstop 120')

_________________________________________________________________________________ 163

Appendix_____________________________________________________________________________

Appendix B

%

% gear_box_change m-file

% Vehicle: Renault Mgane Coup 16V 150 HP

% input: Engine Speed, Actual Gear, Slope Throttle

% output: New Gear

%

%

% Dispatch the flag. The switch function controls the calls to

% S-function routines at each simulation stage of the S-function.

%

switch flag,

%

% Initialization %

%

% Initialize the states, sample times, and state ordering strings.

case 0

[sys,x0,str,ts]=mdlInitializeSizes;

%

% Outputs %

%

% Return the outputs of the S-function block.

case 3

sys=mdlOutputs(t,x,u);

%

% Unhandled flags %

%

% There are no termination tasks (flag=9) to be handled.

% Also, there are no continuous or discrete states,

% so flags 1,2, and 4 are not used, so return an emptyu

% matrix

case { 1, 2, 4, 9 }

sys=[];

%

% Unexpected flags (error handling)%

%

% Return an error message for unhandled flag values.

otherwise

error(['Unhandled flag = ',num2str(flag)]);

end

%

%

% mdl-InitializeSizes

% Return the sizes, initial conditions, and sample times for the S-function.

%

%

sizes = simsizes;

sizes.NumContStates = 0;

sizes.NumDiscStates = 0;

sizes.NumOutputs = 1; % dynamically sized

_________________________________________________________________________________ 164

Appendix_____________________________________________________________________________

sizes.DirFeedthrough = 1; % has direct feedthrough

sizes.NumSampleTimes = 1;

sys = simsizes(sizes);

str = [];

x0 = [];

ts = [-1 0]; % inherited sample time

% end mdl-InitializeSizes

%

%

% mdl-Outputs

% Return the output vector for the S-function

%

%

if (u(3)>=0)

if (u(1)>5000) % 5000 rpm Default Value

switch (u(2))

case {1,2,3,4}

disp(strcat('Change Velocity',num2str(u(2)+1))),sys(1)=u(2)+1;

otherwise

disp('Already in 5th Gear'),sys(1)=u(2);

end

elseif (u(1)==5000) % 5000 rpm Default Value

disp('Velocity Engine equal to 5000')

sys(1)=u(2);

else

disp('Velocity Engine lower than 5000')

sys(1)=u(2);

end

else

if (u(1)<2000) % 2000 rpm Default Value

switch (u(2))

case {2,3,4,5}

disp(strcat('Change Velocity',num2str(u(2)+1))),sys(1)=u(2)-1;

otherwise

disp('Already in 1th Gear'),sys(1)=u(2);

end

elseif (u(1)==2000)

disp('Velocity Engine equal to 2000')

sys(1)=u(2);

else

disp('Velocity Engine upper than 2000')

sys(1)=u(2);

end

end

end

_________________________________________________________________________________ 165

Appendix_____________________________________________________________________________

Appendix C

%

% Analytical Solution for Steering Pad test

% Vehicle: Renault Mgane Coup 16V 150 HP

% input: Steering wheel angle

% output: Lateral velocity, Yaw Rate

%

close all;

tstep=0.002;

tstop=1;

J=1623.8 ;% [kgm^2] Inertia around z-axis (Izz)

L=2.468 ;% [m] Wheelbase Vehicle

L1=0.9552 ;% [m] semi-Wheelbase front Vehicle

L2=L-L1

C1=84085 ;% Cornering Stiffness of front tyre

C2=87342 ;% Cornering Stiffness of rear tyre

% Transmission data

% Renault Megane DATA

etad=.8;

etacv=[0.845, 0.904, 0.93, 0.948, 0.957];

taud = 3.87 ;% dif. gear ratio

taucv=[3.7273, 2.0476, 1.3214, 0.9667, 0.7949] ;% JB1 type

% Rigid driveline

mc=2.5 ;% [kg] Crank Mass

mcr=.35 ;% [kg] Connecting Rod Big End Mass

rc=.04 ;% [m] Crank Radius

ncyl=4 ;% [/] Cylinder Number

ifw=.2 ;% [kgm^2] Flywheel Inertia

icgi=((mc+mcr))*rc^2*ncyl ;% [kgm^2] Crank Gear Inertia

iengine=icgi+ifw ;% [kgm^2] Total Engine Inertia

iwheel=Ieach_wheel*[(etad)/(taud)]^2 ;% [kgm^2] Equivalent Wheel Inertia

mv_unsprung_front=105 ;% [kg] Un-sprung front Mass of Vehicle

mv_unsprung_rear=55 ;% [kg] Un-sprung rear Mass of Vehicle

mv=mv_sprung+mv_unsprung_front+mv_unsprung_rear ;% [kg] Total Mass of Vehicle

u=20;

delta=0.035

if(C1*L1<C2*L2)

disp('Understeering Vehicle'); % Under-steering/Over-steering Behaviour

else disp('Oversteering Vehicle');

end

% A Matrix of coefficients

a11=((C1+C2)/(mv*u));

a12=[((C1*L1)-(C2*L2))/(mv*u)]+u;

a21=((C1*L1)-(C2*L2))/(J*u);

a22=((C1*L1^2)+(C2*L2^2))/(J*u);

A=-[a11 a12; a21 a22];

vp=[((C1*L2*L)-(mv*L1*u^2))*C1*u*delta]/[mv*J*u^2*det(A)];

rp=[C1*C2*L*u*delta]/[mv*J*u^2*det(A)];

beta_p=vp/u;

Rp=(1/delta)*[L-[([(C1*L1)-(C2*L2)]/(C1*C2))*mv*u*u/L]];

alfa_1p=delta-[(vp+(rp*L1))/u];

alfa_2p=-(vp-(rp*L2))/u;

if (alfa_1p>alfa_2p) disp('True only if the vehicle is understeering');

else disp('alfa_1p<alfa_2p because the vehicle is oversteering'); end

_________________________________________________________________________________ 166

Appendix_____________________________________________________________________________

eig(A)

ut=(L/2)*sqrt([(C2*L2)-(C1*L1)]/[mv*L1*L2])

if (u>ut) disp('in fact eigenvalues are complex and conjugate, transient osc. smorz.'); end

parte_im=imag(eig(A));

omega=parte_im(1,1) ; %Puls [rad/s]

parte_re=real(eig(A));

eta=parte_re(1,1) ;%Smor [s^-1]

T=2*pi/omega ;%Per [s]

z1=-[vp;rp] ;% Eigenvectors z1 and z2

z2=(1/omega)*[A-eta*eye(size(A))]*z1;

% B Martrix

b11=C1/(mv);

b21=C1*L1/(J);

B=[b11; b21];

D=[0;0];

t=0:tstep:tstop;

v_long=20*ones(1,length(t)); % input step

Sys=ss(A,B,C,D);

y=lsim(Sys,U,t,'foh');

plot(t,y)

legend('v','r')

close all

Wp=[vp;rp];

Solv=[];

Solr=[];

for k=0:tstep:1

Solv_temp=[exp(eta*k)]*[[z1(1)*cos(omega*k)]+[z2(1)*sin(omega*k)]]+Wp(1)

Solr_temp=[exp(eta*k)]*[[z1(2)*cos(omega*k)]+[z2(2)*sin(omega*k)]]+Wp(2)

Solv=[Solv;Solv_temp];

Solr=[Solr;Solr_temp];

end

figure(1)

plot(t,Solv)

hold on

grid on

plot(t,Solr,'r')

hold on

title('Lateral velocity')

legend('Lateral velocity','Yawing velocity')

figure(2)

alfa1=U'-((V+(R*L1))/u);

alfa2=-((V-(R*L2))/u);

plot(t,alfa1)

title('Slip Angles')

hold on

alfa2=-((V-(R*L2))/u);

plot(t,alfa2,'r')

grid on

hold on

legend('Slip Angle front','Slip Angle rear')

figure(3)

alfa1=U'-((V+(R*L1))/u);

F1=C1*alfa1;

_________________________________________________________________________________ 167

Appendix_____________________________________________________________________________

plot(t,F1)

title('Lateral forces')

hold on

alfa2=-((V-(R*L2))/u);

F2=C2*alfa2;

plot(t,F2,'r')

grid on

hold on

legend('Lateral front force','Lateral rear force')

_________________________________________________________________________________ 168

References

Suspension Controls Present and Future World of Chassis Electronic

Controls, IEEE International Congress on Transportation Electronics

Proceedings, 1988.

Using the Wheel Slip, Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Symposium

on Computer-Aided Control System Design, Dearborn, MI, September, 1996.

Transactions of the ASME Journal of Vibrations & Acoustics, Volume 115, July

1993.

Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '95. Symposium, 1995.

Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '95. Symposium, 1995.

Guidance, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Volume 13, No. 1,

February 1997.

Tyre Force and Moment Models, International Journal of Vehicle Design,

Volume 10, Number 1, 1989.

to Vehicle Dynamics, Proceeding of the 15th IAVSD Symposium held in

Budapest, (Hungary, August 25-29, 1997), Volume 29, 1998.

[9] http://www.adams.com/

Reduce Pavement Damage," Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Paper, No.

892486, November 1989.

Tracking Problem with Input Control of Steering and Brakes", Vehicle System

Dynamics, Volume 15(1986), 1986.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 169

References____________________________________________________________________________

Control Theory to Inverse Simulation of Car Handling", Vehicle System

Dynamics, Volume 26(1996), 1996.

1989.

Performance of Automated Vehicle Steering Controllers: Model Development,

Validation and Comparison", Vehicle System Dynamics, Volume 24(1995),

1995.

Publishers, 1995.

Regelung, AT Automatisierungstechnik 42, S. 429-441, 1995.

Engineers (SAE), Inc., Warrendale, PA, July 1976.

Automotive Engineers (SAE), Warrendale, PA, 1995.

Engineers (SAE), Inc., Warrendale, PA, 1992.

Auflage, Springer, Berlin, 1995. (Relax length)

[22] J. Y. Wong, Theory of Ground Vehicles, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New

York, 2001.

1997.

Meccanica, Politecnico di Milano, 2002.

Actuator, Control and Automation Laboratory, Department of Signals and

Systems, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Gteborg, Sweden.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 170

References____________________________________________________________________________

Automotive Engineers (SAE), Inc., Warrendale, PA, 2000.

Verlag, Berlin, 1995.

Napoli 1989.

[30] ISO 3888, Road Vehicles Test procedure for a serve lane change

manoeuvre, 1975.

[31] ISO 4138, Road vehicles Steady state circular test procedure Open-Loop

test procedure, 1996.

[32] ISO 7401, Road vehicles Lateral transient response test method, 1988.

[33] ISO 7975, Road vehicles Braking in a turn Open-Loop test procedure,

1985.

[35] ISO 8855, Road vehicles Vehicle dynamics and road holding ability

Vocabulary, 1991.

[36] ISO 9816, Passenger Cars Poweroff reactions of a vehicle in a turn Open

loop test method, 1993.

rapides, instables ou pseudostables. Application au contrle de stabilit de

vhicules par approche 12 forces, Laboratoire de Modlisation Intelligence

Processus et Systmes (MIPS), Equipe de Modlisation et Identification en

Automatique et Mcanique (MIAM), Ecole Suprieure des Science Appliques

pour lIngnieur (ESSAIM), Mulhouse, Dcembre 2003.

1979.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 171

References____________________________________________________________________________

Real Time Total Velocity Estimation of a Passenger Car Covering Critical

Situations , IFAC Workshop, Ohio, USA, Proc. 29-36, 1998.

[43] Gen, M., Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Design, Wiley & Sons, New

York, 1997.

de la voiture, Lavoisier, Paris, 2002.

intelligente, Lavoisier, Paris, 2002.

_________________________________________________________________________________ 172

- 2-ADM01-D2-019Uploaded byeli700
- defense paperUploaded byapi-354357120
- GM AcronymsUploaded byMonyFrancis
- Screw ConveyorUploaded byAnonymous LnQ4lBXiPj
- 50_20T x 29.5m DG Crane _R3Uploaded byRv Vaghasia
- Catalogo Netzsch.pdfUploaded bymartinezrdl
- BD50Uploaded byyuvipalak
- 4传动系统(行星 YD13).pdfUploaded byadelmomoura
- Sumitomo Hs mUploaded byMauricio Mpinto
- Tech NotesUploaded byMuvinda Jayasinghe
- Wheel Model 6 CatalogUploaded byHernan Lopez
- AL4 SolenoidsUploaded byNinjabdsm Bd
- Br Cat Cafs Ie2 Eng r00 0Uploaded byKevin Tsui
- LB 28 Data Sheet En_8150-0Uploaded byShailesh Khodke
- DAMPING ANALYSIS OF HIGH GRADE STEEL ALLOY DRIVE SHAFT IN AUTOMOBILE.pdfUploaded byAjay Bhelari
- coupling_hoist cam switch.pdfUploaded byvozefjadav
- M.tech.Automobile EngineeringUploaded byrudey18
- Muana Hydraulic CVTUploaded byNischita Patil
- bmk_ltm_1100-4_1_uw_von_063353_bis_063448_0000000_enUploaded byEdilson
- Lecture03- Dynamic Force AnalysisUploaded bypoh
- EP2306801B1 (Draper Head With Flexible Cutterbar Having Rigid Center Section)Uploaded byalecandro_90
- Front Matter of Vehicle Dynamics and ControlUploaded byMehedi Ehteshum
- TesisUploaded byMuruga Darshan
- Maxitorque T - 318LRUploaded byAnGel Amaya
- Motor Grader XCMG GR215Uploaded byHarisArmadi
- Transmissions for Military Tracked VehiclesUploaded byjaskaran singh
- Komatsu GD655-5.pdfUploaded bylesantiago
- D41P 6C KomatsuUploaded bypacman2011
- The Nano SagaUploaded byshibkrishna
- (Physics for IIT JEE Anurag Mishra) Er. Anurag Mishra - Mechanics for JEE (Main & Advanced) Volume 1-Shri Balaji (2014)Uploaded byAnonymous 7KjHZn

- 60525_2131_CH16Uploaded byKrishanlal Guin
- Module Điều Khiển LED 2Uploaded byhexxa3000
- Modeling, Simulation and Implementation using MATLAB.pdfUploaded byNiranjanWangjam
- Module Điều Khiển LED 2.docxUploaded byhexxa3000
- xemoiUploaded byhexxa3000
- Hack Pet EverwingUploaded byhexxa3000
- HD thiet biUploaded byhexxa3000
- Thong Tin Sp Copy7Uploaded byhexxa3000
- Osu 1157568618Uploaded byhexxa3000
- hông số kỹ thuật xe tải Hyundai HD260.docxUploaded byhexxa3000
- Hyundai Engine CatalogUploaded byEsteban Amador
- Hông Số Kỹ Thuật Xe Tải Hyundai HD260Uploaded byhexxa3000
- GroupB_DrivelineUploaded byhexxa3000
- 02 Product Information 9Uploaded byhexxa3000
- Lousberg_DC_2016.012Uploaded byhexxa3000
- ProductUploaded byhexxa3000
- 238721294-d6ca-b-Truck-Dtc.pdfUploaded byhexxa3000
- Hyundai camiones.pdfUploaded byOmar Maguiña De Paz

- How to Export.import Displacement File From.into CAESAR IIUploaded byGem Gem
- Mechiel Lukkien a?DEA(NI"=Uploaded bysndpsngh59337
- Rainwater Harvesting- An Industrial Case StudyUploaded byIJSTE
- International Journal of Steel Structures Volume 14 Issue 1 2014 [Doi 10.1007%2Fs13296-014-1006-4] Lai, Jiun-Wei; Mahin, Stephen a. -- Steel Concentrically Braced Frames Using Tubular Structural Sections as BracUploaded byAnonymous KyLhn6
- C_iscoUploaded byzocsi
- Anritsu - Understanding Interference HuntingUploaded byScribdFg
- progress_test_4.docUploaded byOsvaldo Velasquez Clavijo
- Vsphere 6.5 DocumentationUploaded bySeun -nuga Daniel
- Basic ElectronicsUploaded bysai79
- PasteUploaded byAnonymous qmBl7K1Vh
- HSN CalculatorUploaded byamirfiroozi87
- GDC Coin- Particular Analysis For Professional Crypto Currency ExchangeUploaded byAjit Patil
- Dell - Dell_EMC CX4 -240Series Storage Arrays - Management ModuleUploaded bysts100
- TF9 ReportUploaded byTing Kee Chuong
- EE120 Information Technology 1Uploaded bySameera
- emails.rtfUploaded byLawal Idris Adeshola
- Clinical Trials Workshop & Summit 2015Uploaded byDeepak Raj
- Datasheet ADE7854_7858_7868_7878Uploaded byAnonymous ZbR7CRz
- MIDINation_ Blogs to Submit Your Music to - Music Blogs (1)Uploaded byfusgtr
- An Experimental Study on a Density Driven Solar Water Heating System Using Supercritical CO2 as Working FluidUploaded bySEP-Publisher
- bordini_informatica_final.pdfUploaded byreddevil123vn2374
- 1.4104englUploaded byLuis Mayorga
- notes5Uploaded byTathagata Ghosh
- A_REVIEW_ON_JUTE_GEOTEXTILE_PART_1.pdfUploaded bykona
- sembhiUploaded byRaunaq Singh
- Tda 1083Uploaded byrogerfujii
- Test Case DesignUploaded bycotizooooo
- pte group 1 re-editUploaded byapi-345751717
- Project 2013Uploaded bySerkan Karadağ
- Personal Fall Protection Equipment — Personal Fall Protection Systems-BS en 363-2008Uploaded byusuarionovodoscribd