Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SPE MEMBER
Permlsslon to copy IS restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 v.urds Il!ustratlons
may not be cop!ed The abstract should conta!n conspwuous acknowledgment of
where am by whom th(s paper was pre~nted Wrda Lrbmma., SPE P O .%. 833836 of 50 MMSTB, an ad-
Richardson TX 754393.3836, USA fax 01.21 4-652 -943S
Selected for presentation at the Ill Latin Anwncan/Cartbbean Petroleum Engmer?rmg
ditional 8 MMBbls
Conference held !n Buenos A)res, Argentina 25.28,1994 are still to be pro-
duced from the= ac-
cumulations. VLA-8
is a longitudinal res-
Summanr.
ervoir leaning
against one of the
This paper describes an integrated resewoir study
major and better de-
performed to select a location for Maravens first
fined faults in the
horizontal well in Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela. A de-
Maracaibobasin, the
pleted reservoir producing for 40 years, and with over
Icotea Fault. H is di-
80% of its recoverable book reserves produced, was Fig 2 Structural Map VLA8 C7
vided in two zones,
selected to place the horizontal drainhole. The field has
according to the structure, one, known as El Pilar,
been yielding high water cuts since 1975,ranging from
towards the eastern boundary, characterised by low
85 to 95 ?40, and vertical new wells would water out
dips (2 to 100), whereas the other presents higher dips
within weeks. The reservoir study used a synergetic
(30-45) as it encounters Icotea, and is known as The
approach from a team composed of Petrophysicists,
Attic, (Fig 2)
Geologists, Sedimen-
tologists and reservoir
The field was originally put on production in 1954. By
engineers, from both the
p%,:; the end of 1958, four wells drilled in the area were
operator and the sewice -.\
,*4, contributing close to 9.7 Mbopd. Water was produced
company, aimed at
from the beginning. By 1960 the average water cut of
choosing the reservoir .-e ,
-J\1, 9 % the reservoir reached 20%, and production rates from
and the best location 1,
the wells were still held high, from 3 to 6 Mbopd. The
within it. The selected .*<,,U. -.. period elapsed from 1970 to 1981 saw a production
reservoir has a dip of 30 ., .-h
decline from 6 to 2 Mbopd, mainly due to water
degrees and leans Lti. 1/
-*
SIC; production, which peaked at 45A in 1970. A study
against one of the ma- ~a
Niai published in 1982 pointed out the possibilities of water
jor faults defined in the ok , ,!fr. cusping between the main line of producers, parallel to
Lake Maracaibo basin. F!g 1 VLA.8 loc.mon map.
Icotea. This Attic area was considered to be the last
possibility of any further development. By 1981 it was
Introduction,
apparent that additional wells had to be drilled, if
production was to be maintained at a plateau. Ten
The VLA 8, C- 7 resetvoir, of mid eocene age, has
years later, water cusping had left behind considerable
contributed over 42 MMSTB of oil to the volumes
amounts of oil to be recovered, while water cut troughout
produced by Maraven in Lake Maracaibo, in western
the field was averaging 857., with most of the wells shut
Venezuela (Fig 1). Reservoir calculations have re-
in because of water production. Reservoir pressure
vealed an OOIP of about 118 MMbbls, and a recovery
had declined from an original 3200 psi at 6500 to
factor of42%. With an estimated producible oil volume
approximately 1800 psi, and the last vertical well
SPEAdvanced Technology Scriw W. 4. No. I I 03
drilled in the reservoir, VlA798, produced up to 1992a during the next ten years the existing conventional wells
total of only 0.4 MMSTB of oil and some 2 MMbls of would have only recovewd some additional 1.8 MMSTB,
18% of the recoverable book reserves, provided that no
~..
Fioklwida PIOUIJUIOn Rxu
, ---- -,- more wells were shut in, that there would be no sensible
T -- 1 - r ! increments in water cuts and sustaining a declining rate
of 6% annual. Also, the most recent wells drilled in the
area ruled out the possibility of adding a new vertical
drainhole to the reservoir, The water cusps made
difficult to find out the exact position of the oil water
contact at a given point, and simulation made apparent
the fact that the lower sands were flooded.
Geological DescrirXion.
TIME
Flg 3 Chronological Pfoduct!on and Pfessurn Hfstoty VLA-8 The structure chosen for placement of the horizontal
drainhole is known as The Attic of VIA-8, on the eastern
water. Figure 3 shows the pressure and production flank of Lake Maracaibos Block 1.This structure origi-
history of the resewoir. nates from one of the most important geological events
of the area: the Lama-lcotea fault, of Mio-Pliocene age,
This paper addressesthe reservoir management proce- oriented NE-SW. The results of 3D seismic interpreta-
dures and the decisions made by an integrated team of tion rendered an anticline, cut by the aforementioned
geoscientists from both Maraven and Schlumberger fault, with dips 35-400 in a southeastern direction (Fig.
that Iedtothe recommendation that a horizontal drainhole 4). From geological considerations, the horizontal sec-
be placed in the Attic patl of the VLA-8 reservoir. The tionofthewellwas
geological, petrophysical and geophysical inputs from planned to be par- Fig 4 Powble
the teams involved, allowed a static resetvoir descrip allel to the Lama-
tion that was then incorporated into a dynamic reservoir Icotea fault,100m
model. The expected performance of the horizontal east of it, oriented
well, named VLA-1 035, was compared to the field N12E, westwards
history, and its impact on the Iongterm development of and upstructre
this depleted reservoir was considered. from the main line
of producers.
-a-
Reservoir ProDetiles and Performance.
c -7
7m
This relatively homogeneous accumulation bears a ,,, ,,,
~
u
34API black oil, and its initial pressure and tempera- .,
,,,
Predrill Studies.
106
SP13 Advanced Technology Sermi. Vol. 4, No. I
FIg 11 Area
selected fof
-.;,,: Horizontal
;0 Drainhole
F!g lC17R~ewolr M&e! areal cd d!stnbutnon
- -4-..4
.-.-..
f =i
the upper C-7 sands were selected as the zone where
the horizontal drainhole would be placed. The second
z~
.
~.--::+>..
.
...-
M--
..! .. -.
,,
!,, . 60%
Or- 2TD
00 ,
.. . . . . . . . . .
,$... $, . . . . . . . . . . . . .-
0$, ? wmld~ $ ,,, .. . . ...!.
. ...-
\ 7493 n w To
,,*!SW W.-mm 0!0
mm
10 da da ku Km ,m ,aa ,,w Zml
FIg 13 Hcmzordal m Vwt!cal, predcied recovery
Dbplaeemem {hot)
Petrophvsical Evaluation.
the highest in the well.(fig 16)
Following the analysis performed on data from nearby
wells of Block 1, it was concluded that an evaluation
As a second objective, the evaluation of the mechanical
program required a full set of logs on the pilot well. This
feasibility of drilling a horizontal section in these sands,
would take into account productivity considerations, as
the IMPACT* program was used. This allowed calcula-
well as the mechanical stability requirements to ensure
tions of the dynamic elastic moduli, rock strengths and
a succesful drilling of the horizontal section. The set of
in situ stresses. It determined the range of mudweights
logs started with {he real time recording of the LWD*
needed for safe drilling. DSI data permitted the compu-
logs CDR* and CDN*. This LWD* operation was fol-
tation of the moduli, which matched closely with those
lowed by the wireline runs of Dual Laterolog(DLL*),
derived from lab measurements made on cores. The
Dipole Sonic Imager (DSI*) and NGT*. It had been
estimation of the horizontal stresses was achieved by
decided that at this stage the target intewal for the
horizontal drainhole would be selected.
Flg 14 Trajectories planned for horizontal sect!on Flg 16 ELAN resuits, Plot V@
m W*4 11 b,,
-----------------
Ptizalw ------------- -_
PKkor ,.~c, ... . .
Acknowledgments