Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mr. Williams
November 8, 2017
About
For this project, my group and I built a functioning trebuchet that could launch a clay
projectile as far as possible. Our design for our project was very basic and simple, but
the results spoke for themselves. It consisted of a base, 3 rubber bands, a spring, an
arm, an axle, a nail at the end of our arm, a hook for holding the spring, and two legs.
Calculations
Horizontal Distance= 46m, the horizontal distance was the amount of meters that the
Mass of Projectile= 0.162 kg, this mass was found after we weighed and converted our
final projectile
Angle of Release= 35 degrees, this was found using a protractor after my group and I
shot a slow motion video of our projectile leaving the hook it rested on.
Time in Air= 2.2 sec., it took the projectile 2.2 seconds exactly to land at 46m and we
Horizontal Velocity= 20.9 m/s, the horizontal velocity was found using the equation
Vertical Velocity= 21.56 m/s, the vertical velocity was found using the equation
Total Velocity= 30.02 m/s, to find the total velocity my group and I used the
pythagorion of a^2+b^2=c^2 and used our vertical velocity and our horizontal velocity as
the a^2 and b^2 to find c^2; which was 30.02 m/s
Vertical Distance= 23.716 m, to find vertical distance we used the equation distance
kinetic energy equals one half multiplied by mass multiplied by velocity squared or
KE= mv^2
PE spring= 27.56 J, the potential energy of the spring was found using the equation
PE=KX^2
Spring Constant= 122.5 N/m, to find the spring constant first we needed to find the
force which is F=ma, then using the force found the constant of the spring using the
formula K=F/d for both our spring and rubber bands the added them both together for
Modifications
Before my group and I presented our final product there were a few modifications that
1. Spring vs Rubber bands = both We made this modification using both a spring
and rubber band, because since we already had a spring the thought of using
both rubber bands and springs was interesting. Using the rubber bands we could
have the potential energy from the rubber bands that leads to kinetic energy so
2. Amount of Rubber bands = 3 When my group and I made this modification the
three rubber bands added more resistance to our strong metal spring. Before
using the rubber bands our trebuchet only reached a maximum distance of 32
meters. After adding the rubber bands the resistance added to the projectiles
launch force, acceleration, and and then our distances consistently ranged from
37 meters to 50 meters.
3. Projectile String Length = 8 inches The projectile string length was an important
released from the nail holder. In our data in the clear paragraph my group and I
found that from all of our lengths tested 8 inches was the most consistent and
went the farthest. There is also a graph included with my paragraph which shows
all of our findings, and 8 inches was the most successful. To our understanding
this was because the time stays the same, but the distance changes and that
4. Arm Ratio = 2:1 ( load:effort) This modification helped us because we now had
more distance on our arm on the outside and the time it took us to pull back the
spring/ rubber bands stayed the same. Since v= d/t it made our projectile go
5. Stopper Location = none This modification came after my group and I discovered
that when we had a stopper in our original position, it kept the arm from
extending to its full potential. It created an odd angle that made our projectile not
launch very far. Since getting rid of the stopper location all together, our arm was
able to have a longer time to build momentum and lead to the projectile having
more velocity.
and I for our trebuchet , since our projectile was launched off of the hook we had
before it hit our stopper. So not having a stopper only stopped our arm after our
7. Projectile Mass = 16.25 g ( 0.016 kg) This modification was made because my
group and I wanted to find out if changing our projectile mass if we could produce
more force for the projectile to travel. When we made this modification we made
our new distances increased and we reached our farthest distance of 50 meters.
8. Hard Projectile We made this modifications so our string would not rip through
the projectile, and that would lead to the projectile continuing farther with more
force since it had a larger/ more dense mass. To complete this my group and I
changed the mass from 0.155 kg to the new mass of 0.162 kg and iced the clay
in a cup for about 2 minutes in between each of our launches. After icing the
projectile, and thus making it harder, it launched consistently each time between
43 meters to 50 meters. In conclusion this modification was a success, and
Clear Paraharph
CLEAR
The most successful string length to launch your projectile is eight inches. My group and
I built a trebuchet out of four pieces of wood with two pieces being the arms, one used for the
arm, and another for the base. We also added an axle around an inch and a half from the top of
both arms. Another piece to our trebuchet was that we had a hook that held our spring in place
and also holds the rubber bands in place on one side, and on the other side we have another
hook that we represented with a screw so our string could be secured until we launched the
machine. During our trials we tested different lengths of string, but kept all other aspects of our
trials the exact same. The lengths we used were five inches, six inches, seven inches, eight
inches, and nine inches; five inches traveled 16m, six inches traveled 18m, seven inches traveled
20m, eight inches traveled 22m, and nine inches traveled 13m (this is based off of each string
lengths average). This data shows that eight inches went the farthest distance, measuring by
meters, during this experiment which was 22 meters in average as compared to the others. The
reasoning behind this data and conclusion is because the time stays the same, but distance is still
affected by the length of the string. This leads to a change in velocity which is change in distance
over change in time. All in all, my group found that the most successful string length for
Key Features
Very simple and basic design so it is easy for people to use and launch