12/10/2017 Loads acting on aircraft | Aerospace Engineering Blog

"As an undergraduate studying aerospace engineering, I have to say this blog is a great resource for gaining extra history and
insight into the field." - Ryan A.

More than 15,000 people visited the Aerospace Engineering Blog last month to learn something new about aerospace engineering.
To get started, check out some of our most interesting posts, listen to the podcast or subscribe to our monthly newsletter.

ABOUT THIS BLOG CONTACT PODCAST BOOKS DOWNLOADS SUPPORT Search

Operational Requirements Antifragility and Aircraft Design SIGN-UP TO THE MONTH

AEROSPAC ED NEWSLETT

Loads Acting on Aircraft Your email address

on F E B R U A R Y 2 , 2 0 1 4 in G E N E R A L A E R O S P A C E
JOIN 1 2 0 0 + OTHERS!

The flight envelope of an aeroplane can be divided into two regimes. The first is rectilinear flight in a straight line, i.e. the
aircraft does not accelerate normal to the direction of flight. The second is curvilinear flight, which, as the name suggests, TOP POSTS & PAG ES
involves flight in a curved path with acceleration normal to tangential flight path. Curvilinear flight is often known as
Boundary Layer Separation
manoeuvring and is of greater importance for structural design since the aerodynamic and inertial loads are much higher
Jet Engine Design: Turbine
than in rectilinear flight.
A Brief History of Aircraft S
As the aircraft moves relative to the surrounding fluid a pressure field is set up over the entire aircraft, and not only over the The DeHavilland Comet Cr
wings, that acts to keep the aircraft afloat. This aerodynamic pressure always acts normal to the outer contour of the skin but An Introduction to Compos
the resultant force can be resolved into two forces acting tangential and normal to the direction of flight. The sum of the
forces normal to the direction of flight give rise to the lift force L, which offsets the weight of the aircraft i.e. offsets the REC ENT POSTS
weight of the aircraft W. The tangential components give the resultant drag force D, which in powered flight must be
Podcast Ep. #2 Prof. Pau
overcome by the propulsive force F. The resultant force F includes the thrust generated by the engines, the induced drag of
Stiffness and Smart Aerosp
the propulsive system and the inclination of the line of thrust to the direction of flight. In basic mechanics the aircraft is
Podcast Ep. #1 Dr Chaun
simplified into a point coincident with the centre of gravity (CG) of the aircraft with all forces assumed to act through the
Rocket Science and Advanc
centre of gravity. If the net resultant of a force is offset from the CG then a resultant moment will also act on the aircraft. For
Materials
example, the lift generated by the wings is generally offset from the centre of gravity of the aircraft and may thus produce a
Introducing the Aerospace
net pitching moment that has to be offset by the control surfaces. Figure 1 below shows as a simplified free body diagram of
Podcast
an aircraft in level flight, climb and descent.
Aerospace Hall of Fame: E-
Aerospace Hall of Fame: A

TOPIC S

Aerodynamics (26)
Aerospace Engineering (2)
Aircraft (1)
Bio-mimicry (8)
Case Studies (14)
Composite Materials (15)
Composites (2)
Engineering (22)
General Aerospace (26)
Helicopters (1)
History (24)
Jet Engines (1)
Manufacturing (6)
NASA (1)
News (3)
Novel Materials/Tailored S
Podcast (2)
Renewables (1)
Rocket Science (7)
Technology (12)
Fig. 1. Free body diagram of aircraft in flight (1)

http://aerospaceengineeringblog.com/loads-on-aircraft/ 1/4
12/10/2017 Loads acting on aircraft | Aerospace Engineering Blog

Note that the lift is only equal and opposite to the weight in steady and level flight, thus:

and

In steady descent and steady climb the lift component is less than the weight, since only a component of the weight acts
normal to the direction of flight and because by definition lift is always normal to both drag and thrust. Also in climbing the
thrust must be greater than the drag to overcome the component of weight acting against the direction of flight and vice
versa in descent. Thus in a climb:

and

and in descent

This situation is schematically represented in Figure 1 by the relative sizes of the different arrows. In general we can imagine
the weight being balanced by the lift force L and the difference between the thrust F and the drag D. A bit of manipulation of
the two equations for climb or descent above gives the same expression,

such that,

The latter expression is clearly obtained if Pythagoras rule is applied to the vector triangles that include (F-D) and L in
Figure 1.

Figure 1 also shows velocity diagrams depicting the relationship between true air speed V, tangential to the direction of
flight, and the rates of climb and descent and respectively. We can combine these velocity triangles with the forces
triangles to obtain simple equations for the rates of climb and descent,

and

such that or .

This expression can also be used to gain some insight into the driving factors behind gliding flight. In this case the net
propulsive force F is zero such that the expression becomes,

which may be approximated to since the angle of descent in gliding is typically very shallow.
Therefore the gliding efficiency of a sailplane depends on maximising the lift to drag ratio L/D. If the ascending thermals are
equal to or greater than this rate of descent than the glider can continuously maintain or even gain in altitude.

An aircraft may of course increase its speed along the direction of rectilinear flight in which case the thrust force F must be
greater than the vector sum of the drag and the component of the weight. A more interesting scenario are accelerated flight
where the acceleration occurs as a result in change in direction rather than a change in speed. By definition, in vector
mechanics a change in direction is a change in velocity and therefore defined as acceleration, even if the magnitude of the
speed does not change. A change in the flight path is achieved by changing the magnitude of the overall lift component or by
differences in lift between the two wings, away from the equilibrium condition depicted in Figure 1. This change can either
be obtained by a change in true airspeed or by changing the angle of attack of the wings relative to the airflow. Consider the
simple banked turn in Figure 2 below.

Fig. 2. Free Body Diagram of an aircraft in a banked turn (1)

As the aircraft banks the lift force normal to the wings is turned through an angle from the vertical weight vector. Since the
centripetal acceleration acts horizontally and the weight acts vertically we can use simple trigonometric relations to find the
radius of turn:

http://aerospaceengineeringblog.com/loads-on-aircraft/ 2/4
12/10/2017 Loads acting on aircraft | Aerospace Engineering Blog

such that . It is also obvious that the more steeply banked the turn the more lift will be
required from the wings since,

such that increase in engine power is needed to maintain constant speed under this flight condition. This is one of the
reasons why fighter jets that require manoeuvres with very tight radii have such short and stubby wings. Small radii if turn R
and thus high banking angles require increases in lift and therefore increase the bending moments acting on the wings.

In reality the airplane is subjected to a large variety of different combinations of accelerations (rolls, pull-ups, push-overs,
spinning, stalling , gusts etc.) at different velocities and altitudes. In classical mechanics free fall is expressed as having an
acceleration 0f -1g and level flight is denoted as 0g. The aeronautical engineer differs from this convention in order to make
the comparison between lift and weight simpler. This means that free fall is denoted by 0g and level flight by 1g. The ratio
between lift and aircraft weight is called the load factor n, where , i.e. n = 0 for free fall, n = 1 for level flight, n > 1 to
pull out of a dive and n < 1 to pull out of a climb. The overall load spectrum of an aircraft is captured graphically by so called
velocity load factor (V-n) curves. The outline of these diagrams are given by the possible combinations of load factor and
velocity than an aircraft will be expected to cope with. For example Figure 3a shows the basic V-n diagram for symmetric
flight (asymmetric envelopes exist for rolls etc. but are not covered here).

Fig. 2 The a) basic manoeuvre and b) gust flight envelopes (1)

The envelope is constructed from the positive and negative stall lines which indicate, respectively, the maximum and
minimum load that can be achieved because of the inability of the aircraft to produce any more lift. Thus,

where is the density of the surrounding air and is the wing surface area. The limiting factor also known as the
maximum expected service load is defined by

or 2.5, whichever is greater, with W the max take-off weight.

, and are defined as the maximum manoeuvre speed ( the speed above which it is unwise to make full application
of any single flight control), the design cruise speed and the maximum dive speed, respectively. The intersection between the
horizontal line and the left curve of the envelope is also of special significance since it represents the stall speed at level
flight. In general the limit load factor must be tolerable without detrimental permanent deformation. The aircraft must also
support an ultimate load (=limit load x safety factor) for at least 3 seconds. The safety factor is generally taken to be 1.5.

Finally, Figure 3b shows a typical gust envelope. A gust alters the angle of attack of the lifting surfaces by an amount equal to
where w is the vertical gust velocity. Since the lift scales with the angle of attack up to the point of aerodynamic
stall, the inertia forces applied to structure are altered by the gust winds. The gust envelope is constructed with the same stall
lines as the basic manoeuvre envelope and different gust lines are drawn radiating from n = 1 at V = 0. Note that the design
7gust intensities reduce as the velocity increases, with the intention that the aircraft is flown accordingly. In the gust envelope
Shares
is replaced with , representing the design speed at maximum gust intensity.

http://aerospaceengineeringblog.com/loads-on-aircraft/ 3/4
12/10/2017 Loads acting on aircraft | Aerospace Engineering Blog
7

References

(1) Stinton, D. The Anatomy of the Airplane. 2nd Edition. Blackwell Science Ltd. (1998).

Share this:

Email Facebook 7 Twitter LinkedIn Reddit More

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this.

related posts

Control and Stability of Aircraft Aeroelasticity, composites and the The Atmosphere
January 23, 2016 Grumman X-29 January 18, 2014
April 16, 2017

Tagged with: Aerospace Aircraft design Engineering

Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Website

I'm not a robot

reCAPTCHA
Privacy - Terms

POST C O MMENT

Want to learn more about

aerospace engineering?

http://aerospaceengineeringblog.com/loads-on-aircraft/ 4/4