Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Academic and Research Vice-rector

Activities guide and evaluation rubric

1. General description of the course

Faculty or Escuela de Ciencias Bsicas, Tecnologa e
Academic Unit Ingeniera
Academic Level Profesional
Academic Field Formacin disciplinar
Course Name Diseo de Sistemas
Course Code 301309
Course Type Terico Can be yes No
enabled
Number of Credits 2

2. Description of the activity

Type of the Individu Collaborati Number of
2
activity: al ve weeks
Final: Unit
Unit II - System
Moment of
Initial Intermedia Design and
evaluation:
te: Developme
nt
Delivery Environment of the
Evaluative score of the
activity: Monitoring and Evaluation
activity: 125
Environment
Starting date of the
Deadline of the activity:
activity:
13 de diciembre de 2017
30 de noviembre de 2017
Competence to develop:
Identifies the various elements to be taken into account in the design
of an information system from the elements, process and generate
a result.
The student identifies and applies the characteristics and elements
of the design inputs and controls, data validation, design of source
documents and data capture for the entry in addition to the
characteristics and elements of the design of outputs, the types of
outputs and how to present information in addition

Topics to develop:
 Design of the user interface
Design of subsystems

Steps, phases of the learning strategy to develop

Analysis of the situation.
Conceptualization

Activities to develop
Gui Design
Design of dialog boxes

Environme Knowledge Environment

nt for the Collaborative Learning Environment
developme Monitoring and Evaluation Environment
nt
Individual:

The company SysUNAD Ltda, whose organization chart is:

Products to
deliver by
student

Must be carried out:

Continue with the unit selected in the previous job.
The layout of the application windows and contextual
menu.
Design of the dialog boxes
Design of windows to the information system.
 Collaborative:
Consolidate the contributions of the members of the
small group.
Each member must give its endorsement to the
consolidated document before uploading it to the
indicated space.
Deliver to the monitoring and evaluation
environment in the space corresponding to STEP 3,
a PDF document containing:
o Cover page
o Introduction
o Goals
o Solution of proposed points
o Conclusions
The name of the document is: name CW_Code
Couerse_## (Example: CW_301309_00).
The document must be delivered with APA style
http://www.apastyle.org/
Weighting: 25% of the total rating (125 pts.)

General guidelines for the collaborative work

In the development of collaborative work by
students requires some key elements that lead to an
academic exercise, responsible and effective.

Planning of For this to be achieved it is necessary that among

activities for others with the steps outlined in the document entitled
the "Guidelines of the curriculum in the UNAD / Aspects of
development collaborative work and accompanying teacher" (Abbey,
of Sailing, Montero & Vargas, 2014, pp. 16-18):
collaborative Recognition of stakeholders: At the beginning of
work each evaluative activity the student will make its
recognition as an stakeholder of the group, presenting
their strengths and exposing the channels of
communication to be effective interaction.
 Assignment of roles: Each member of the group
will assume one of the roles listed, which will be
functionally during the implementation of the
collaborative work. It is suggested to rotate roles in
each of the activities, tending to a comprehensive
training of all participants in the group.
Planning of the academic activities: planning of
the activities becomes a key element for the
achievement of the task. The group will undertake a
work plan for the development of academic activity, on
the basis of the analytical reflection of the agenda of
activities, the guide and rubric assessment. Carried out
the required readings by acquiring ownership issue.
Staging of the principles of collaborative work: it
is important to internalize the principles of interaction,
growth and responsible action to ensure the excellent
development of their learning process and presentation
of written products that correspond to the quality of
what was requested in the course.
The active participation: it requires a proactive
participation with individual contributions relevant to
the construction of a product that account as requested
by the activity guide.

Each student will choose one of the five roles that

are specified in the check box next to this and assume
responsibly the function of this in order for the
participation in the collaborative work is relevant,
active with an assertive communication and the
Roles to
construction of collaborative products requested and
perform by
within the established times.
the student
The document "General Guidelines of the
in the
curriculum in the UNAD / Aspects of collaborative work
collaborative
and accompanying teaching (abbey and others: 2014),
group
p. 11, establishes the following roles for the
implementation of the collaborative work of course:
Compiler.
Reviewer.
Evaluator.
 Deliveries.
Alerts.

Relate the roles that are established in the UNAD

for collaborative work. It is important to assume with
responsibility, but without leaving your commitment as
a student in front of the development of the activity.
Compiler: Consolidate the document that is
constituted as the end product of the debate, taking
into account that has been included the contributions
of all participants and to include only the participants
involved in the process. You should inform the person
responsible for the alerts to notify who did their shares,
which are not included in the product to be delivered.
Reviewer: Ensure that the written to comply with
Roles and the rules of presentation of works required by the
responsibilit teacher.
y for the
Evaluator: Ensure that the document contains
delivery of
the criteria present in the rubric. You must
products by
communicate to the person in charge of the alerts to
students
report to the other members of the team in case you
have to make any adjustment on the subject.
Deliveries: Alert on the delivery times of
products and send the document in the time stipulated,
using the resources allocated for the shipment, and
indicate to other colleagues who has made the delivery.
Alerts: Ensure that you notify the members of
the Group of developments in the work and inform the
teacher through the forum of labor and the messaging
of the course, which has been carried out in the delivery
of the document.

Use of the standard PAC, version 3 in Spanish

Translation (version 6):
Use of APA are the style of organization and
references presentation of information used in the area of social
sciences. These are published under a Manual that
allows you to have the ways in which you must submit
 a scientific article. You can find the most relevant
aspects of the sixth edition of the Manual of APA, as
references, quotes, preparation and presentation of
tables and figures, headers and seriation, among
others, by going to the page http://www.apastyle.org/

What is plagiarism for the UNAD? plagiarism is

defined by the dictionary of the Real Academia as the
action of "copy the substance of the works of others,
making them as their own." Therefore plagiarism is a
serious offense is the equivalent in the academic field,
to theft. A student who plagiarizes does not take their
education seriously, and does not respect the
intellectual work of others.
There is no plagiarism. If a student makes use of
any portion of the work of another person, and does
not document its source, is committing an act of
plagiarism. Now, it is clear that all we have with the
ideas of others at the time of submission of our own,
and that our knowledge is based on a knowledge of the
other. But when we rely on the work of others,
Plagiarism academic honesty requires that explicitly announce the
policy fact that we are using an external source, either by
appointment or by means of a paraphrase annotated.
For the UNAD, 029 in the agreement of 13
December 2013, article 99, are regarded as offenses
against the academic order, among others, the
following: "(e)The plagiarism, that is to say, to present
as their own the whole or part of a work, work,
document, or invention made by another person. It also
implies the use of quotations or references, or propose
citad offenses where there is no coincidence between it
and the reference"; and (f) "The play, or copy with non-
profit, educational materials or results of research
products, which have intellectual rights reserved for the
University.
Academic sanctions that will face the student are
the following:
 (A) In cases of academic fraud shown in the
respective evaluation or academic work, the grade will
be zero point zero (0.0) without prejudice to the
disciplinary sanction.
(B) In cases related to plagiarism in academic
work whatever its nature, the grade will be zero point
zero (0.0), without prejudice to the disciplinary
sanction.

4. Evaluation rubric

Evaluation rubric

Activity Individual Collaborativ

type: Activity e Activity
Final: Unit
Moment II -
Unit
of the System
Initial Intermediat
evaluatio Design and
e:
n Developm
ent
Assessed Performance levels of the individual activity
Score
Aspects High score Media score Low score
Presents Presents
contributi significant Contributions
ons to the contributions to with little
No product
constructi the meaningful 10
on of development of content points
collaborati the activity
ve work (up to 10 (up to 5 (up to 0
points) points) points)
This is the item
Carries out the but does not
No product
To design design patterns perform the 20
the menus patterns points
(up to 20 (up to 10 (up to 0
points) points) points)
 This is the item
Performs the but does not
Performs
graphical perform the No product
the 20
interfaces graphical
graphical points
interfaces
interfaces

(up to 20 (up to 10 (up to 0

points) points) points)
This is the item
Carry out
Performs the but does not
the
designs of perform the No product
windows 20
dialog boxes design of the
of the points
dialog boxes
informatio
(up to 20 (up to 10 (up to 0
n system.
points) points) points)
Performance levels of the collaborative
Assessed
activity Score
Aspect
High score Media score Low score
Makes a Although there
Participate Does not
substantial is no
s makes participate in
contribution to participation,
contributi the
the the
ons for the construction of 20
construction of contributions
constructi the final points
the final they lack
on of the document
product deepening
final
(Up to 20 (Up to 10 (Up to 0
document
points) points) points)
Applies the
APA in the Applies Not applicable
Apply entire partially APA APA 20
APA document points
(Up to 12 (Up to 0
(Up to 6 points)
points) points)
Presents a
Presents a
Structure document with Document
document with 15
of the final good devoid of any
some errors in points
document organization organization
your
complying with
 the request organization or
contained in spelling
the Guide
(Up to 15 (Up to 7 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Final score 125