Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Evaluating
buoyant
MIIXmedia
flocculatio
In laborato y and field studies, a two-stage buoyant coarse
media flocculator provided settled water turbidities c2 ntu at
loading rates as high as 12 gpmlsq ft.
Christopher R. Schulz,
Philip C. Singer, Robert Gandley,
and James E. Nix
BCM flocculation
Air-scour
distribution pipe
research project
The objective of the BCM
Flocculator
outlet
flocculation research project
f
was twofold: (1) to optimize
the configuration and oper-
ating criteria of the BCM floc-
culator using model suspen-
sions of kaolinite clay in a
controlled laboratory setting
?+# Pilot flocculator with straight-bed configuration and (2) to evaluate the per-
formance of an optimized
BCM flocculator using coag-
ulated water from two sur-
I face water treatment plants.
These objectives were
addressed in two phases of the
project. In phase 1, testing
was conducted at the Baity
c Flocculation
Engineering Rcscarch Labo-
tank with ratory at the University of
straight bed North Carolina at Chapel Hill
using a specially designed
pilot-scale BCM flocculator
Bet cers c media unit. In phase 2, the pilot unit
was installed at two water
treatment plants in Durham
and Carrboro, N.C.
Phase 1: laboratory
1 studies
Pilot-scale SCM floccu-
Drain lines
lator. The pilot-scale BCM
Drain valve flocculator consisted of a rec-
Pump
/ tangular flocculation cham-
Feedwater Che\mi~%~ed point
ber and a multitap overflow
column, both fabricated from
clear acrylic to permit visual
monitoring of particle behav-
bed by agitating the media and releasing entrapped ior within the units. The overflow column was used
floes to the floor of the chamber. not only to establish the water level in the floccula-
Sludge will tend to collect at the bottom of the tion chamber but also to serve as a second stage floc-
chamber, particularly after the bed has been cleaned, culation chamber (when filled with plastic packing
and should be removed intermittently. This may be media) for many of the test runs. The flocculation
accomplished by (1) using a hopper bottom arrange- chamber was 8 ft high x 4 ft wide x 1 ft deep. A rel-
ment with drain valve, or (2) installing mechanical atively large tank was required to provide a reason-
sludge collection equipment on the floor of the cham- able ratio of tank width to media diameter (~15: 1) to
- Initial 111~1**(1~~
Effluent - Settled (firs{ stage)
I.. Settled (second stage)
Beginning of new run
7
:: O I , , , , ..
I
0 20 40 60 80 120
0 100 200 300
Time-h
Time-s
58 JOURNAL AWWA
Copyright (C) 1994 American Water Works Association
achieved a 20-min settled-water turbid-
Comparison of settled-water turbidity ity in the range of 2 ntu (the desired tar-
get value), whereas the Williams test
iypeof OWASA Plant Wllllams Plant results ranged from 5 to 6 ntu. Intro-
nacsulatw ntu ntu ducing a second flocculation stage
Plant mechanical flocculator 0.5 4.0
improved the settled-water turbidity at
Jar tests 0.5 2.0 both plants (Figure 1 l), but the Williams
First-stage BCM flocculator 2.0 5.5 plant was still unable to meet the desired
Secon&+stage BCM flocculator 0.5 4.0
target of 2 ntu. Clearly, the BCM unit
produced a better settleable floe at the
OWASA plant than at the Williams plant.
Effect of polymer addition on head loss To explain the difference in floccula-
accumulation at Williams plant tor performance, jar-test flocculation was conducted
on coagulated water from both plants. In addition,
400 mechanically flocculated water from both plants was
- No polymer - Polymer (0.1 mg/L)
collected and allowed to settle for 20 min in jars.
These results are compared in Table 3 with 20-min set-
300 tled-water turbidity measurements from the first-
stage and second-stage BCM pilot flocculators.
The data indicate that the OWASA settled-water
200 turbidities were significantly lower than those of the
Williams samples in all cases. The two-stage BCM
flocculator was able to achieve the same level of per-
100
formance as the plant mechanical flocculators at both
plants and as the jar tests at the OWASA plant. These
observations led to the conclusion that the difference
0 I I I I I I
:, 100 120
in performance of the BCM flocculator at the two
20 40 60 60
plants was attributable to quality differences in the
Time---h
coagulated water used during the pilot testing.
Because the source-water qualities at the two plants
are similar, it is believed that the BCM flocculator
would have produced a lower settled-water turbidity
l The sampling procedures were the same as those at the Williams plant (comparable to the OWASA
used in the laboratory studies, with special care being plant results) if the coagulant chemical dosages were
taken to avoid floe breakup during sampling. the same as those used at the OWASA plant; i.e., a
l Jar tests were used to verify that the coagu- higher alum dosage and a cationic polymer.
lated water applied to the BCM pilot flocculator (from PoZymer a&ition. On the basis of visual observa-
the plants rapid-mixing basins) could be flocculated tions during the test runs, it became clear that the
and settled effectively in the jars. addition of a 0.1 -mg/L dose of cationic polymer at
l A perforated air-diffuser pipe
was installed underneath the BCM
bed for air-scour cleaning. This
proved to be an effective method deeper first-stage flocculator bed will
of cleaning the bed, even at rela-
tively low air flow rates. No appre- result in greater head losses, longer
ciable expansion of the bed or dis-
ruption of the stratified media
residence times, and improved turbidity
occurred during cleaning. removal.
Results and discussion.
Source-water quality and coagu-
lant chemistry. The performance of the single-stage the OWASA plant was beneficial in preventing shear-
BCM flocculator was markedly influenced by the ing of aluminum hydroxide floes through the ripened
quality of the coagulated water applied to the floc- BCM bed of the first-stage flocculator. By contrast,
culator. For example, the overall head loss across the floe shearing was observed along the flow paths within
BCM bed increased much more rapidly in the OWASA the BCM bed at the Williams plant, which does not
tests than in the Williams tests, as shown in Figure 9 add a polymer aid for coagulation.
for the same flow rate and bed configuration. This To improve performance at the Williams plant, a
result indicates a greater degree of floe retention in the cationic polymer dose of 0.1 mg/L was added to the
media bed for the OWASA tests. coagulated influent water to the BCM flocculator. The
Different results were also observed with regard to effect of such polymer addition on head loss and set-
settled-water turbidity (Figure 10). The OWASA tests tled-water turbidity of the first-stage flocculator is pre-
60 $0 6b I
40
I
60
I
60
Time-b Time-b
of floe particles in the media bed occurred at approx- two source waters tested in the field studies. A single-
imately the same rate. Under these conditions, clean- stage flocculator provided effective treatment for one
ing of the bed would not be required, because the of the source waters at the same loading rates. Floc-
stabilized head loss value is less than the established culation performance was not influenced by chang-
target of 1 ft. However, this finding must be tem- ing the hydraulic loading rate over the range 3-12
pered by the fact that for some test runs, head loss gpmlsq ft (higher loading rates were not tested dur-
conditions did not stabilize and head loss accumu- ing the study). At a loading rate of 12 gpm/sq ft, it may
lation rates were somewhat erratic, as illustrated in be possible to increase the capacity of an existing
Figure 20, possibly because flow pathways within the mechanical flocculator by more than 50 percent
media bed were not properly developed and exces- (assuming the mechanical flocculator has a 15-ft basin
sive clogging occurred, especially at higher loading depth and average residence time of 30 min) without
adding additional tankage, by
applying BCM flocculator tech-
nology. More testing should be
ecause of the relatively high shearing conducted on different coagulated
waters and on colder waters to
forces within the BCM bed, the use of a confirm these results.
Source-water quality and
polymer aid may be required as a floc- l
in nature to determine the effect of various design within the BCM bed, the use of a polymer aid may be
and operational parameters on BCM flocculator per- required as a floe-conditioning agent, especially if
formance and to evaluate its performance on two alum is used as the primary coagulant.
different coagulated waters, the following conclu- In general, the overall head loss across the BCM
l
sions can be drawn. bed appeared to stabilize around 200 mm (8 in.) for
l A two-stage BCM flocculator provided effec- the range of hydraulic loading rates tested, although
tive treatment (20-min settled-water turbidities <2 higher head loss peaks were noted in several test
ntu) at loading rates as high as 12 gpm/sq ft for the runs; this phenomenon should be further evaluated