Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reading Report 1
Brandt, Deborah. Sponsors of Literacy
In this essay Sponsors of Literacy, Brandt defines sponsors as any supporter, teaching,
model, or advancement of literacy and its development in the lives of people. Throughout the
years, and within every generation, literature as a whole expands. The economy and social
movements also have to do with that expansion and change with literacy as well. Although
literacy and its sponsors are alleviating, there are misappropriations. One misappropriation
would be the church-sponsored literacy for economic and physical survival. Brandt initiates the
topic with the print shops of antebellum America in the twentieth century and how the
workshops served as incubators for literacy and political discussion. These print shops were
outmatched by steam shops, obliging these people into this new economy and forcing them to
sharpen their reading and writing skills. Literacy was derived from the sponsors of magazines,
encyclopedias, essay contests, radio, television programs, etc. It is portrayed that race, economic
living, and wealth had much of an impact on people's availability to receive sponsors. For
example, Dora Lopez and Raymond Branch were born in the same year and lived in the same
area. Yet, Lopez had less access to literacy sponsors because she was in a low-caste racial group.
Compared to Branch who was born into high-caste racial group, had generous amounts of
powerful sponsors. As we witnessed from the interviewees, literacy and the sponsors behind it
have shaped and opened plentiful opportunities to their lives. Whether it is a legalistic form of
literacy which has more powerful sponsors, that Dwayne Lowery experienced. Or Carol Whites
experience of literacy through a spiritual sponsor. To even Sarah Steele comprehension of
literacy to elevate herself and her family past the expectations of lower-middle class. Brandt
interviewed and studied these people as an aim for us to recognize literacy as a pursuit of us, and
not too much of how the economy should be the basis of our learning of literacy and its sponsors.
While reading Brandts essay, I was very captivated by the different stories of each of the
interviewees and how literacy and its sponsors changed their lives. But the one passage that
opened my conscious was Sponsorship and Access. The reason why I was attracted more to
this passage than to any of the other ones was because it spoke the truth about what we see a lot
of in our society today. Brandt mentions the statistical association between high literacy
achievement and socioeconomic and how the majority-race status commonly shows up in results
of national tests and literary performances. The primary examples Brandt used were the parallel
experiences of Raymond Branch and Dora Lopez. Both Branch and Lopez were born in the same
year and moved to the same area. The only difference was that Branch grew up in a higher class
than Lopez. Branch did not have to work as hard as Lopez did to get to where he is at. And why
so? Because Branch had more sponsors available at his feet than did Lopez.
In the first paragraph of the passage Brandt says something that made me realize how unfair
the economy is with our education. Throughout their lives, affluent people from high-caste
racial groups have multiple and redundant and contacts with powerful literacy sponsors as a
routine part of their economic and political privileges low-caste racial groups have less
politically secured access to literacy sponsors (Brandt 6). Its sad to see how race and our
economic standing defines what sponsors we receive to fulfil our education. It makes me feel
very fortunate to have the sponsors that I receive and the ones I have to work hard for.
Carolina Gonzalez
Reading Report 1
X, Malcolm. Learning to Read