Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VISHWAVIDYALAYA BHOPAL-
462036
2
DECLARATION
Thank You
Table of Contents
Sr. No. Topic Page no.
1. Introducton 6
i). Effectve Span
ii). Stffness
iii). Loads
iv). Analysis
2. Load Distributon 11
3. Moment Calculaton by KANIS 14
Method
4. Design of One way Slab 19
5. Design of Two way Slab 25
6. Design of T-Beam 32
7. Design of Column 37
8. Design of Staircase 40
9. Design of Flat Footng 46
10. Conclusion 51
11. References 52
5
Multistory Building
1.1. INTRODUCTION
6
1.2. EFFECTIVE SPAN
1.3. STIFFNESS
7
It is to be noted that in Multistory frames, columns of
upper stories carry less axial force but more moments,
while columns of lower storey carry more axial loads and
less moments.
Design can roughly estmate the axial load on lower storey
column and arrive at sizes of the column.
Next two to three stories can have same size. Beyond that,
sizes may be reduced. Stffness of member is given by (I/L).
1.4. LOADS
8
1.5 ANALYSIS
9
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN
10
Load due to slab: (KN)
A = 13.79+13.79+10.575+10.575 = 48.73
B = 13.76+13.79 = 27.58
C = A = 48.73
D = 13.79+10.575+8.44+4.22 = 37.025
E = 13.79+8.44+4.22+4.11+2.93 = 33.49
F = 13.79+10.575+2.93+4.11 = 31.405
G = 4.22+8.44 = 12.66
H = 4.22+8.44+4.11+2.93 = 19.70
I = 4.11+2.93 = 7.07
Load due to slab: (KN)
A = 2.25
B = 2.25+3 = 5.25
C=3
D = 3.375
E = 3.375+1.875 = 5.25
F = 1.875
G =3.375
H =6.675
I =3.375
11
Loadings on Frame:
2) => 13 + {[(0.2X0.3X3.3X25)X5]/15.5} + 13
= 28KN/m
12
Fig. LOADED FRAME
13
KANIS METHOD
14
Fixed End moments: (KMm)
15
2 2
wl 112 3
Mf BI 84
Mf IB 8 8
Mf IN 210.58
Mf
NI
MfCH 42
Mf DG Mf HC 21
MfGD
Mf EF 9.75
Mf H Mf FE 105.3
M
Mf MH
MfG 52.65
L Mf LG 24.44
Mf F
K Mf KF
16
Moment of Inertia:
17
Rotation Factors:
Joint Member Stifness R.Stiffness R.F.
BA 2I/1.5 -0.26
B BI 2I/3 86I/33 -0.12
BC 2I/3.3 -0.12
CB 2I/3.3 -0.16
C CH 2I/3 62I/33 -0.18
CD 2I/3.3 -0.16
DC 2I/3.3 -0.16
D DG 2I/3 62I/33 -0.18
DE 2I/3.3 -0.16
E ED 2I/3.3 14I/11 -0.24
EF 2I/3 -0.26
IJ 2I1.5 -0.22
I IN 2I/4.75 1898I/627 -0.07
IH 2I/3.3 -0.10
IB 2I/3 -0.11
16
Rotation Factors:
HI 2I/3.3 -0.13
H HM 2I/4.75 1442I/627 -0.10
HG 2I/3.3 -0.13
HC 2I/3 -0.14
GH 2I/3.3 -0.13
G GL 2I/4.75 1442I/627 -0.10
GF 2I/3.3 -0.13
GD 2I/3 -0.14
FG 2I/3.3 -0.18
F FK 2I/4.75 354I/206 -0.12
FE 2I/3 -0.20
17
Final End Moments (KNm)
18
Check M 0 at each joint. Taking moments due to
earthquake load = 6KNm Remark : Checked OK.
19
Design of One way Slab
X
1
.
3
)
provi
de
dept
h=
88.7
5
90
Take deff = 125 mm
Overall depth D = d +(c.c+/2) assume dia. of bar 10mm
= 125 +(20+10/2) c.c= 20mm
= 125+25 =150 mm
OK-SAFE
22
Step 9 :- Spacing Of Main Bar
(1) (1000 x Ast) / Astmin = (1000 x /4 x 10 ) / 180
= 437 mm
(2) 3d = 3x125 = 375 mm
(3) 300 mm = 300 mm
(which ever is less )
23
provide ( = 300 mm )
= 10 mm @ 300 mm c/c spacing along shorter
span.
24
Fig. Reinforcement Details in One way Slab.
24
Design of Two way Slab
25
Given Data-
Size of slab (m) = 7 x 4.75
Live load = 2 KN/m
support thickness = 200 mm
Finishing = 1 KN/m
Use M20 & Fe415
Step 1):- Design constant-
fck = 20 MPa, fy = 415 MPa
Mu lim = 0.138 fck bd
Xu = 0.479 d
Step 2):- Type of Slab-
ly/lx = 7/4.75 = 1.5 < 2
(Two way slab)
Step 3):- Deffx = lx/26 x 1.5 = 4750/26 x 1.5 = 121.7 mm = dx
125 mm = dx
Assume 10 , clear cover 20 mm
dy = 125-10 = 115 mm
Overall depth of slab D = d+(c.c.+ /2)
D = 125 + 20 + 5 = 150 mm
26
Step 4):- Effective length of Slab
here support thickness = 200 mm
ly/lx x y
1.46
31
Design of T- BEAM
32
Data :
2
Clear span(L) = 4.75 m, fck = 20 N / mm
2
Depth of fange (Df) = 150 mm, fy = 415 N / mm
Depth of web (bw) = 200 mm
Imposed Load = 112 KN/m,
The least of
(i) Centre to centre of support = 4.75+0.2 = 4.95 m
(ii) Clear span + effectve depth = 4.75 + 0.32 = 5.1 m
Effectve span = 4.95 m
Step-3 Loads
Imposed load = 112 KN/m
Ultmate load = 1.5 X 112 = 168 KN/m
33
Step-4 Ultimate BM and Shear force
2
wl
Mu 0.125 168 514.55KN
8 4.952 m
2
wl
Vu 0.5 168 4.95 415.8KN
2
Step-5 Effective width of flange(bf):
l
b 6D
bf w f
6
=[(4.95/6)+0.2+(6X0.15)
= 1925 mm
Step-6 Moment capacity of Flange section(Muf):-
SV = (0.87X415 X(4)X8/397.88X10)
Sv = 220 mm 200 mm
provide spacing of 100 mm and gradually increase to
200 mm at centre of span
Step9:- Check for deflection Control
Pt = 100 Ast/(bf d)
= (100 X 5378 )/( 2025 X 320 ) = 0.83
bw/bf = 200/2025 = 0.099
(L/d)provided = L/d x Kt x Kc x Kf
4950/320 = 20x1.05x1x0.94
15.46 19.74
hence, check for defecton is satsfactory.
Data-
Axial load on column = 400 KN3737
Length (L) = 3.3 KN
Column size = 200X300
Adopt M20 and Fe415
Fck = 20 N/mm Fy = 415N/mm
Step1:- Effective length of column-
both end fixed l = 0.6 L
= 0.65 X 3.3 = 2.145 m
factored load Pu = 1.5 X 400 = 600 KN
Step2:-Slenderness ratio-
unsupported length/least lateral dimension
{Leff/D} = 2145/200 =10.725 12
hence column is designed as short column
Step3:-Minimum Eccentricity-
emin = [(l/500)+(D/30)] or 20 mm
= 10.96 mm or 20 mm
emin = 20 mm
Check,
10.96/200 = 0.05 0.05
OK
Hence, codal formula for short column is applicable.
41
Step 3 :- Effective length-
leff = c/c dist. b/w support
= 3000 + 1500 +200/2 = 4600 mm
42
(2) Self wt. Of step per meter length
= (R/2)pcc = (150/2)24 = 1.8 KN/m
w = 8.74
wu =1.5 w = 13.11 KN/m
43
Step 7:- Check for effective
depth
drequired = (Mu/0.138fckb)
=
(34.67X10/0.138X OK SAFE
20X1000)
drequired = 112.078 mm
drequired dprovided (i.e.= 150 )
44
Step 8:- Main steel
Ast = 0.5X20/415[1-1-
{(4.6X34.67X10)/(20X1000X150)}]
711 mm
Astmin = 0.0012X1000X150 = 180 mm
use Ast = 711 mm
45
Fig. Reinforcement Details in Stairs
45
Design of Flat Footing
Data:
Assume SBC of soil = 200 KN/m
Reinforcement concrete column size = 200 X 300
Axial service load P = 400 KN
Adopt M20 & Fe415
46
Assuming square footng,
Size of footing = 2.2 1.45m
Adopt size of footng = 1.5m X 1.5m
M
d required
0.138 f ck b
6
92.95 X 10
d required 410.35mm Adopt 420mm
0.138 X 20 X 200
Assume cover = 60mm
Thus, Overall Depth = 420+60 = 480mm
c
f ck 4.6 M u
A 0.5 1 1 Bd
st
f y f Bd 2
20 4.66 X 92.95 X
A 0.5 1 10 1500 X 420
1
415 20 X 1500 X 420
st 2
Ast 623.18mm 2
Astmin 0.0012 BD
2
A 0.0012 1500 864mm
stmin 480
Use, As min 864mm 2
0.25 f ck
0.25 20
1.11
OK SAFE.
c
Fig. Sectonal View
Fig. Plan
CONCLUSION