Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(DTec 2008)
Shanghai, China
18 November 2008
1
Background
z Industry demand
World offshore oil and gas production has increased
significantly. Forecast is for 150 FPSOs being in service or
on order by 2010.
Number of FPSOs in operation has doubled, from 50 to
104, since 1998. The number of FPSOs predicted to again
double by end of 2010*.
z Technical challenge
Environment: US Gulf/Gulf of Mexico, Canada, South
America, UK/Norway North Sea, West Africa,
Mediterranean, Asia/Pacific, South Africa
Ship type: Aframax FPSOs, Suezmax FPSOs,
VLCC/ULCCs, Specialist FPSOs, LNG FPSOs,
LPG FPSOs, CNG FPSOs
* Carnegie Securities Research
2
FPSO Ship Shaped Offshore Structure
3
FPSO Conversion Ship Type Offshore Structure
Structure Assessment
yielding, buckling,
ultimate strength, fatigue
4
Overview
5
FPSO Conversion
z Prediction of
environmental loads for
strength and fatigue
assessment
Tanker trading history
Transit to site
On-site operation
z Determination of renewal scantlings based on
transit, on-site, inspection and repair conditions
z Evaluation of scantlings including hull girder
ultimate strength assessment
6
FPSO Conversion Guide
z Assessment of local
and global strength for
yielding, buckling and
fatigue failure modes
z Fatigue damage assessment
calculations including high
cycle and low cycle
fatigue
z Methodologies use some of the requirements in
Common Scantling Rules suitably modified to
reflect FPSO operating practice
7
Strength and Fatigue Assessment in ABS FPSO Analysis
8
Environmental Effects - SEAS Concept in ABS FPSO Analysis
Sea Loads
Analysis
SEAS
(Sea Environment Assessment System)
Generation of Hull
FPSO on Site and Route Configuration Model
fatigue analysis
Yielding Ultimate Strength Buckling Fatigue
Sea and swell
10
Initial Scantling Evaluation
11
Hull Girder Ultimate Strength
The hull girder ultimate strength, Mu, is the maximum bending
capacity of the hull girder beyond which the hull will collapse.
The hull girder ultimate strength state limit defined by
M uh
Mu
s M s + w w M w Hogging
Bending Moment,M
u Curvature,
12
Total Strength Assessment
13
Total Strength Assessment
z Structures evaluated
Hull structure
Topside-hull interface
Mooring-hull interface
14
Fatigue Assessment
15
Low Cycle Fatigue Analysis Procedure
Simplified or FE analysis
Stress
pseudo
Elastic Peak Stress Range Ke
(LCF, hot spot stress)
elastic
actual
Neuber Curve
Plasticity Correction Factor
(Ke)
Damage Calculation
(S-N curve, Miners Rule)
16
Plasticity Correction Factor Ke
3.5
Plasticity Correction Factor
3 AH32
AH36
A
2.5
DH36
1.5
0.5
Elastic Hot Spot Stress Range, S , (MPa)
E
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
17
S-N Curve for Low Cycle Fatigue
100 mm Profile flame cut, ground
gauge and polished, corners
length radiused to 1.5 mm
12 mm
104 TWI and DSME 152
Median (least squares line) based on Neuber analysis 102 mm
q = 2.43 mm
triangles = TWI
403 mm
circles = DSME
Pseudo Hot Spot Stress Range, (MPa)
900 mm
Ground
end 38 mm
Extended
c) 8 mm fillet weld 12 mm
D-Curve
m=3 152 mm
1000
20 mm
Median - 2*sigma
q = 2.43
11 mm
100 20 mm
100 1000 104 105
Cycles to Failure, N 400 mm
18
Low Cycle Fatigue
20
21