The gift of tongues in Acts is always associated with the baptism in the Holy Spirit.

The promise of the

Father, baptism with the Holy Spirit, filled with the Spirit, and references to the Holy Ghost being poured
out or falling upon believers are terms used interchangeably in Scripture with one exception which R. A.
Torrey notes: Baptized with the Holy Spirit, is nowhere used in the Bible of any experience but the first
and suggests an initial or initiatory experience.(65) He suggests we therefore use this term only to
describe the initial filling of the believer with the Holy Spirit.

This point is generally agreed upon even by those who reject tongues, since the New Testament clearly
and repeatedly admonishes believers to be filled with the Spirit. The points of contention are whether
the initial filling necessarily happens to every Christian at the moment of regeneration, and whether or
not tongues should still be expected as a necessary sign of it. This debate necessarily narrows down to
the purpose of speaking in tongues. Given Lukes relatively cursory mention of this gift, one could ask
what his purpose is in mentioning it at all?

Lukes purpose in writing, as stated by himself in Luke 1:1-4, was to set down an orderly account of those
prophesies concerning the Messiah and His church which had been fulfilled before their very eyes, in
order to strengthen the faith of Theophilus. In Acts, he shows how the church fulfilled not only O.T.
prophecy, but Christs commission as well. Since Jesus Himself, in referring to the enduement with power
as the promise of the Father, as well as Peter in Acts 2 and Paul in 1 Cor. 14:21, each indicate that the gift
of tongues is a fulfillment of O.T. prophecy concerning the church and the last days, Luke includes it in his
account; documenting its part in the fulfillment of Christs commission as well. Thus, the fulfillment of
prophecy and of Christs commission are the only two purposes for tongues with which Luke is
concerned, since this is the focus of his writing. An extensive treatment of the purpose of tongues in
collective worship or the spiritual life of the average believer of that day would be a departure from his
point.

Also, since he is writing for Theophilus, not for us, he naturally would have excluded extensive
information about subjects with which Theophilus would undoubtedly have been all-to-familiar, such as
the structure and events of a typical early-church worship service.

We know from Pauls testimony in 1 Cor. that apparently quite a number of the believers in Corinth
spoke with tongues, as did Paul himself. That the Ephesian believers spoke with tongues is indicated by
his admonition that they should pray in the Spirit (Eph. 6:18 cf. 1 Cor. 14:15). The fact that Luke mentions
only three major instances of tongues, and relates them to the spread of the gospel to the major people
groups, while neglecting their mention in ch.8 and the many other salvation accounts, does not mean
they did not occur in these instances. Luke may have just been avoiding redundancy (especially in light of
that days paper costs) and sticking to his purpose, which was to chronicle the fulfillment of prophecy and
Christs commission.

Luke also chooses not to teach us of the Eucharist in Acts, so we base our understanding of it on Christs
command and Pauls teaching on the meaning of and procedure for observing it, given to the Corinthians
because of their abuse of this ritual. Likewise, we must look elsewhere for detailed treatment of the gift
of tongues; and we find it from the same sources. In Mark 16:17, Jesus states that tongues are a sign
that will be manifested in those who believe. Luke leaves us wishing for the testimony of one who was
there as to what part, if any, tongues played in the individuals spiritual life and collective worship at that
time. Paul gives us exactly this, and again his most detailed treatment is directed toward those who were
abusing it. Thank God for the Corinthians! Is it not comforting to see how God can use even our
shortcomings to the benefit of His church?

What does Paul tell the Corinthians (and us) about the correct purpose and use of the gift of tongues?
Citing Isaiah 28:11, he says that tongues function as a sign. Just as the strange tongue of the Assyrians
was to be a sign to Ephraim of Gods judgment, so the gift of tongues in the N.T. served as a sign to the
Jews of Gods involvement in those events as well. There is, however, a further purpose for tongues. Paul
says the gift, when properly used, is intended to edify the individual and, when interpreted, the church
body.

But how is this accomplished? What is the point, after all, of speaking a language even you yourself
cannot understand? Paul answers this question in 1 Cor. 14:2, For he that speaketh in an unknown
tongue speaketh not unto men, but unto God. In verse 14, he states, For if I pray in an unknown tongue,
my spirit prayeth (emphasis mine) and continues in verse 15 with, I will pray with the spirit and, I will
sing with the spirit. In verses 16 and 17 Paul indicates that tongues are used to bless and give thanks to
God. Instead of being in the form of a message directed toward the church, which is always the case with
prophecy, it is intended to be a form of worship and prayer. This worship and prayer interpreted
generates participation on the part of other members of the body, and thus it becomes a means of
edification equal to prophecy, In prophecy the edification springs from the Spirit-quickened Word, while
in tongues and interpretation the edification springs from Spirit-quickened worship and prayer.(Brandt,
55).

The speakers in tongues in Acts 2:11 were proclaiming the wonderful works of God. In the house of
Cornelius, they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God.(Acts 10:46). In Acts 19:6, who were
the speakers in tongues addressing? Paul, who witnessed the event, tells us that he that speaks in an
unknown tongue speaks not unto men, but unto God. Furthermore, he encourages the Ephesians to pray
in the Spirit(6:18), and Jude likewise tells us to build ourselves up in our faith by praying in the Holy
Spirit.

According , then, to both the record of Luke and Pauls teaching, the gift of tongues serves two primary
functions. It is a sign to the unbeliever of Divine presence and activity, and a means of building up the
believer and the church through Spirit-inspired prayer and worship.

Although some contend that the gift of tongues was meant only for the early church, Scripture nowhere
states that this is so. In fact, there are two quite strong statements to the contrary: Pauls command in 1
Cor. 14:39 to forbid not to speak in tongues, and Peters statement in Acts 2:39, For the promise is to you
and to your children, and to all who are far off, as many as the Lord our God shall call (emphasis mine).
Taken together with Christs statement in Mark 16:17, as well as the various admonitions to pray in the
spirit throughout the N.T. , I see no scriptural reason for believing the gift tongues is not meant for
believers throughout this church age.

Works Cited

Brandt, R.L. Tongues, the Greatest Gift?; Bridge Publishing, c.1981

Torrey, R.A. Baptism With The Holy Spirit; Revell, c.1897