DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1. Dhama V, Chaudhary R, Singh S, Singh M. Evaluation of pelvic organ

prolapse by standardized POP Q system for vaginal hysterectomy. Int J
Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol, 2017; 6: 2584-8.

2. Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ

prolapse. Int Urogynecol J, 2013; 24: 17831790.

3. Wang Y, Jiang J, Han J. A review of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification

system in China. Int Urogynecol J, 2015. DOI 10.1007/s00192-015-2830-6.

4. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, B K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P,

Shull BL, Smith ARB. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic
organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996.
175:1017.

5. Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P. Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Quantification System (POP-Q) a new era in pelvic prolapse staging.
Journal of Medicine and Life, 2011; 4(1): 7581.

6. Porges RF. A practical system of diagnosis and classification of pelvic

relaxations. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1963; 117: 769-73.

7. Baden WF, Walker TA, Lindsday HJ. The vaginal profile. Tex Med J, 1968;
64: 56-8.

8. Beecham CT. Classification of vaginal relaxation. Am J Obstet Gynecol,

1980; 136: 957-8.

9. Bump RC. The POP-Q system: two decades of progress and debate. Int
Urogynecol J, 2014; 25: 441443.

10. Theofrastous JP, Swift SE. The clinical evaluation of pelvic floor
dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 1998; 25: 783804.

11. Reid F. Assessment of pelvic organ prolapse: a practical guide to the pelvic
organ prolapse quantification. Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive
Medicine, 2014; 24: 6.

12. Visco AG. Wei JT. McClure LA. Handa VL. Nygaard IE. Effects of
examination technique modifications on pelvic organ prolapse quantification
(POP-Q) results. Int Urogynecol J, 2003; 14: 136140.
13. Pearce P, Swift S, Goodnight W. Pelvic organ prolapse: is there a difference
in POPQ exam results based on time of day, morning or afternoon? Am J
Obstet Gynecol, 2008; 199: 200.e1-200.e5.

14. Muir TW, Stepp KJ, Barber MD. Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse
quantification system in peer-reviewed literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003;
189: 16321635.

15. Treszezamsky AD, Rascoff L, Shahryarinejad A, Vardy MD. Use of pelvic

organ prolapse staging systems in published articles of selected specialized
journals. Int Urogynecol J, 2010; 21: 359363.

16. Harmanli O. POP-Q 2.0: its time has come!. Int Urogynecol J, 2014; 25:
447449.

17. Oyama IA,. Steinberg AC, Watai TK, Minaglia SM. Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Quantification use in the literature. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2012;
18: 35Y36.

18. Boyd SS, OSullivan D, Tulikangas P. Use of the Pelvic Organ Quantification
System (POP-Q) in published articles of peer-reviewed journals. Int
Urogynecol J, 2017; DOI 10.1007/s00192-017-3336-1.