3 Batting Technique Myths You Can S

PitchVision Page 1 of 8
Login
(https://www.pitchvision.com)
3 Batting Technique Myths You Can Stop
Worrying About
(https://www.pitchvision.com/#/review)
Filed in: Batting (/category/batting) Cricket (/category/cricket)
(https://www.pitchvision.com/#/technology)
Technique (/category/technique) Everyone's a Tweet Like
cricket coach. (http://twitter.com/share)

Or so it seems these days. Advice comes
? (https://www.pitchvision.com/frequently
from every angle; coaches, family
members, the internet and even passers-
(https://www.pitchvision.com/forum)
by calling out. That would be great if it
all matched up, but most of the time it is
in direct conflict with another piece of
advice.
Then there are the myths and clichs on

top. The advice that sounds good, and makes the advisor sound wise and
clever. In fact, it's based in no more evidence than it was overheard on
TV. So it must be true for everyone, right?
It's enough to make you go back to bed instead of picking up the bat and
dealing with the swirl of advice in your head.
So, here is some clarity for you: Three simple bits of advice we have all
heard (or perhaps even given) that don't make as much sense as they
seem. Once you know that these things are not always true, you can get
on with getting back to the simplicity of hitting the ball with a clear mind
and a confident outlook.
You are welcome.
https://www.pitchvision.com/3-batting-technique-myths-you-can-stop-worrying-about 9/3/2015
1. "Watch the ball on the bat"
Login
Studies have show that this is not how the eyes work when a ball is
moving towards you.
Instead, we look at the bowler as he is releasing the ball and make a
prediction and move our eyes to where the ball is going to be. The better
the batsman, the faster this happens (http://www.pitchvision.com/why-
mental-toughness-is-a-myth). You might argue that's all good in theory,
but you can't advise a player to do that: It's a naturally occurring reaction
we do subconsciously. So you have to advise the player to "watch the ball"
and let nature do the rest.
That would be right, except some people don't watch the ball very hard.
When they do, they tense up and lose their natural rhythm. For these
people, watching the ball intensely is damaging advice. Lucky for you, it's
easy to work out your visual preference
(https://www.pitchvision.com/why-you-shouldnt-tell-batsmen-to-watch-
the-ball).
2. "Get to the pitch of the ball"

Again on the surface, this seems solid advice. If you can get your front
foot to the ball, it's a half volley and it's a four.
How people read this advice is to take a longer stride forward. After all,
that's good footwork. For many people this works well as they naturally
play better leading with the foot. For others, who are more inclined to
lead with the head, a big stride is a poor position.
So, it's more important to get to the line of the ball than the length when
you play forward. This works for botht those who lead with head and
those who lead with feet. Then, if you naturally have a big stride you can
let it happen. If you naturally have a smaller stride you will hit more "on
the up" more often, but will be just as effective.
If you want to know which method is your way, take a look at your chin
when you drive (http://www.pitchvision.com/pietersens-chin,-ronaldos-
Login
feet-and-the-wide-stance-8-year-old).
3. "Lift your bat high"

When I coach beginners, I often see the habit of barely lifting the bat up
at all in the backswing. The 8 year old instead tries to get power by
"poking" at the ball with the bat. The obvious advice is to tell the player
to lift the bat up higher to get a swing going and get more power.
My theory is that this has translated into older and experienced players
getting told that lifting the bat high will generate more power like, say, a
golf swing. What it is really about is rhythm and timing.
Some people, including Kevin Pietersen (http://www.pitchvision.com/kp),

can generate a lot of power from a low backlift (about stump height).
Others, notably Brian Lara, got timing from a big backswing. So it's more
important to do what comes naturally.
Experiment with what feels better overall. If your backlift is low but you
can "muscle" the ball then do it that way. If you prefer to caress the ball
you might feel better with more firepower coming from a longer
downswing.
That's my three, but what about you?
What myths have you rejected? Perhaps it's "hit the ball under your eyes",
or "take some time to get your eye in"?
Leave a comment and let me know your thoughts.
Author: David.Hinchliffe | Wed, 29/10/2014 - 09:53 Tweet Like

(http://twitter.com/share)
Want More Cricket Coaching Tips? Get
the FREE newsletter!
If you liked this article and you want more advice, then you can get even
more tips delivered to your email inbox every week from PitchVision
Academy! Login
The email newsletter is packed with advice from world-class
names like Nathan Bracken, Kevin Pietersen, Mark Garaway and many,
many more. Plus it's totally free, forever!
Click Hereto Get the Free

Cricket Coaching
Newsletter (http://www.pitchvision.com/subscribe)
Comments

by andrew.beaven | Wed, 29/10/2014 - 10:36
This is a very timely article, David. I worked with a batsman at the weekend who was
getting out caught behind, or slicing the ball into cover's hands - diagnosed as a problem
getting into a good position to play the ball on the off side.
After hearing TV commentators criticising an international player for moving too much, my
batsman was almost frozen on the crease.
My myth-to-be-busted: stand still at the crease until the ball is bowled/the bowler gets
into his delivery stride. Especially when this is interpreted as "stand perfectly still".
We started working on footwork, and finding his balanced "ready position"; I suspect that
this will ultimately lead into a pre-delivery trigger movement but still keeping head and
eyes as still and level as possible . Definitely not standing still, though.
reply (/comment/reply/9021/2773903)
by paul delany (not verified) | Wed, 29/10/2014 - 14:34
Re myths - i get the one (no 1 myth)where bat predicts where ball will be and moves to
play it, but if he predicts it will be just outside off stump and batting on leg he goes on
front foot to intercept it and hits it between cover and extra, its unlikely he ever got in
line with the ball as he moved from let to off to intercept ball. How do you tally the get in
line advise which is a long time coaching manual tip with my mythical cover drive above
(no 2 myth - get to pitch of ball) Can see that playing off back foot allows you get in line
in most cases. I often use expression get as close to bounce of ball or else as far from
bounce of ball as possible.
by AB (not verified) | Wed, 29/10/2014 - 16:33
I see no reason to assume that a cover drive would not be played with the head perfectly
in line and over the top of the ball. That's how the pro's play it.
by rohit raman (not verified) | Thu, 30/10/2014 - 06:07
sir i have problem in my bating my bat is coming open.now i want to know how can i
improve this and i want to know that where from bat come from 3man or 2slip
by Habib (http://www.habibnoorbhai.com) (not verified) | Fri, 31/10/2014 - 09:34
Thanks for the article, in particular No 3: "Lift your bat high"

Login
I am a Biokineticist and cricket expert based at the University of Cape Town and currently
doing my PhD on cricket batting with my supervisor, Prof Timothy Noakes.
We are evaluating the evolution of batting techniques among cricket players and our
hypothesis is that players need to be coached
(https://www.pitchvision.com/#/review) on an individual basis and not merely by the
coaching manual where there is much of a generic approach of coaching. In addition, we
are exploring the Rotary Style of batting as adopted by Sir Donal Bradman and how it was
effective for him in disseminating adequate timing of the ball, playing with power and
maneuvering/utilizing the crease effectively.
The sentiments from the research so far is fairly similar to yours in that each player should
play naturally with what they are comfortable with (high or low backlift). However, we
would argue with the fact that the backlift should not go straight back towards the wicket-
keeper or over the stumps, but should rather have: 1. The face of the bat face point or
gully, 2. The point of the bat face atleast second slip and towards gully, and 3. The pick
up of the bat should be more rotary instead of straight over the stumps. This would ensure
power when hitting the ball and the bastman would have more time getting behind the
ball, especially on the back foot.
It is imperative that coaching youth cricketers is individualised and specific to the natural
way or 'trademark' that the young cricketer each employ. If you notice kids playing calypso
cricket or street cricket, you would notice that most of them (if not all): 1. Display the
above three attributes. and 2. Hit the ball with power with a semi-to-full rotary batting
style.
We have come a long way in cricket coaching, from CB Fry's book in 1912 - 1920, MCC
Coaching Manual in 1954 and the revised edition in 1994 and now with the latest myths and
updates. I think above all, it is important for all coaches to allow players to play the way
they feel comfortable and natural and correct their technique only if they are doing more
harm than good.
For any further interesting or enlightening discussions on cricket batting, feel free to drop
me a mail on: habib.noorbhai@yahoo.com (mailto:habib.noorbhai@yahoo.com) / follow me
on twitter: @HN434 / see my website: www.habibnoorbhai.com
(http://www.habibnoorbhai.com)
Best wishes
Habib
by andrew.beaven | Fri, 31/10/2014 - 16:13
Habib - good to see that someone is taking a serious look at Don Bradman's technique.
Previously, David has spoken against the unscientific n=1 ("just because it worked for Sir
Donald, that's no reason to think it would work for anyone else"), but I would be fascinated
to see your findings on the success (or otherwise) of players using the "rotary" method.
Are you also taking a look at Greg Chappell's "unweighting for batting" principles?
One point in your post that I must challenge, however.
You wrote: "If you notice kids playing calypso cricket or street cricket...most of them (if
not all)...[h]it the ball with power with a semi-to-full rotary batting style."
Most of them try , perhaps. What proportion actually succeed in hitting consistently with
power? Not all of them, nor even most.
by AB (not verified) | Fri, 31/10/2014 - 17:23
Login
There is very little point saying that technique X is good without explaining how and why it
is good.
Most batting technique there is a perfectly logical explanation as to why certain things
worth better than others, but saying
"The pick up of the bat should be more rotary

(https://www.pitchvision.com/#/review) instead of straight over the stumps. This
would ensure power when hitting the ball "
tells me absolutely nothing useful whatsoever. HOW does it ensure power? You might as
well tell me to kiss my lucky rabbit foot.

(https://www.pitchvision.com/frequently
by Habib (http://www.habibnoorbhai.com) (not verified) | Fri, 31/10/2014 - 20:29
Dear Andrew,
Thank you very much for the comment.
I am warmed to hear that these have been employed by the ECB and certainly agree with
your work. Well done!
I think a player such as Sir Donald Bradman deserves the credit to be explored
scientifically and see how it has benefited him (and not necessarily to ne thrown upon
others).
Firstly, I have read and looked at a century of sources regarding cricket batting (46 cricket
batting books (including Greg Chappell as you mention, Bob Woolmer, Geoffrey Boycott,
Anthony Shillinglaw and many others), 38 articles and 16 DVDs). There are often
similarities and differences in what each of these prescribe. I think we are in an era where
we are yet to emphasise the importance of individualism, flare and effectiveness.
So in my research currently, we have observed 60 of the greatest batsmen of all time in

the last 120 years (1895 - 2014) and had selected these successful test batsmen based on
a defining criteria entailing averages, more than 5000 runs scored in a career and bowlers
faced during their era. Forty different batsmen were also selected for ODI (1975 - 2015)
and strike rate was included in the criteria. We are yet to include T20 batsmen.
What we found with both groups is that more than 75% of the batsmen employed the
lateral batting technique (3 attributes mentioned earlier and/or rotary batting style)
during their careers. Less than 30% of these batsmen employed the modern batting
technique (as deployed by CB Fry and the MCC of the straight bat backlift over the
stumps). These were analysed utilizing biomechanics software and it took heaps of time
and effort to source the videos of these players, especially those prior to 1954
The second analysis we did was on current adolescent cricketers (n = 50) and more than
80% of these batsmen had employed the modern batting technique, simply because their
coach taught them to. 45% of these batsmen were comfortable to play the lateral way
initially but mentioned that they were corrected by their coaches in the latter stages of
their development.
With regards to Calypso cricket / street cricket, you would find that there is a probability
of them scoring more runs consistently than those boys playing the traditional coaching
way. Having had discussions with professional coaches and whilst working with County and
State teams, it is adamant that the Carribbean and some sub-continent teams coach their
players to play with flare and comfort in the early stages up to U/17 level and later
nurture this talent in modifying it to be effective depending on the formats of the game.
On the other hand, commonwealth nations such as Australia, New Zealand and England, in
addition to South Africa, at times put more emphasis on being technically sound.
A question we are about to ask in the research: how many balls did a batsman leave in a
test match before 1980 as opposed to now? We hypothesize that batsman leaving the ball

more often had put more emphasis on safety / passiveness in an attempt to prevent Login
knicking off the ball. And therefore, the lateral batting technique would avoid this margin
for error of being knicked off to the wicket-keeper or in the slip-quadrant.
We are yet to evaluate and correlate the elements of power, timing and effectiveness with
the rotary style and lateral batting technique and unfortunately have no answer for you on
this yet. What I can tell you is that if you look closely at the kinematics and biomechanics
of baseball, golf and the forehand stroke in tennis, all of these would show a
lateral/rotary technique of hitting the ball. I can go into hours of discussing this
philosophy and physics behind these batting styles in these sports and would welcome a
skype call or meeting. I will also be glad to share our updated findings as we go along.
I hope these provide some clarity in certain aspects.
Remember, we are potential enemies in debate, but compatriots in the love of the
beautiful game
Debate is healthy, dissemination without science is dangerous.
Best wishes,
Habib
by Anthony (not verified) | Mon, 20/04/2015 - 08:35
Hi just like to leave my comments as a coach

I don,t worry where the bat is lifted to, but should meet the ball with the full face and not
angled, also I coach the back lift should happen when the make their first step, this puts
the body into to good position to have the bat swinging down once stable base established.
It's easier to coach the kids this, this would be different with adults and you have to
individually coach
Post new comment

* Your name
E-mail
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Homepage
* Comment
Login
Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt>
<dd>
Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Insert Flickr images: [flickr-photo:id=230452326,size=s] or [flickr-
photoset:id=72157594262419167,size=m].
Textual smileys (/filter/tips/1#filter-smileys-0) will be replaced with graphical
ones.
Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
More information about formatting options (/filter/tips)
Notify me of follow-up comments posted here.

Enter the characters shown below
Preview comment Post comment

3 Batting Technique Myths You Can S

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

3 Batting Technique Myths You Can S

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PitchVision Page 1 of 8

Then there are the myths and clichs on

You are welcome.

2. "Get to the pitch of the ball"

3. "Lift your bat high"

Some people, including Kevin Pietersen (http://www.pitchvision.com/kp),

That's my three, but what about you?

Leave a comment and let me know your thoughts.

Author: David.Hinchliffe | Wed, 29/10/2014 - 09:53 Tweet Like

Click Hereto Get the Free

by paul delany (not verified) | Wed, 29/10/2014 - 14:34

by AB (not verified) | Wed, 29/10/2014 - 16:33

by rohit raman (not verified) | Thu, 30/10/2014 - 06:07

by Habib (http://www.habibnoorbhai.com) (not verified) | Fri, 31/10/2014 - 09:34

Thanks for the article, in particular No 3: "Lift your bat high"

by andrew.beaven | Fri, 31/10/2014 - 16:13

One point in your post that I must challenge, however.

"The pick up of the bat should be more rotary

Thank you very much for the comment.

So in my research currently, we have observed 60 of the greatest batsmen of all time in

I hope these provide some clarity in certain aspects.

by Anthony (not verified) | Mon, 20/04/2015 - 08:35

Hi just like to leave my comments as a coach

Post new comment

More information about formatting options (/filter/tips)

Notify me of follow-up comments posted here.

Preview comment Post comment

You might also like