Apqp Inglês

REGISTRATION DATA FOR DEVELOPMENT
Customer: Name: Wheight of part (Kg):
Part Number: Internal Code: Date Registration

Review:
Date of draw: Date of draw review: Start Date:

5/5/2016
Feedstock: Feedstock Code:
Feedstock: Feedstock Code:
Component: Component Code:
Component: Thermal Treatment

code:
surface finish: Surface Finish Code:
Flow Chart Process Operations

Operation Machine Description Comments
Critical Features
Index Comennts Value Means of Mensurement
Check Frequency: Reaction Plan

5part/start - 5parts/4hours
Stop the processs and comunication the leader of process.
Scketching: how to process sheet

B24: NMERO DA OPERAO:
C6: NOME DO CLIENTE
C8: NMERO DA PEA
C10: DATA DO DESENHO
C12: DESCRIO MATRIA PRIMA
C20: Descrio do acabamento superficial.
C24: CAPACIDADE DE
MQUINA:
C49: DESCREVER AS
CARACTERSTICAS CRTICAS INDICADAS NO
DESENHO:
C53: FREQUENCIA DAS MEDIES NO PROCESSO:
D54: INDICAR O PROCEDIMENTO

EM CASO DE IRREGULARIDADES:
E10: Date of Last Modification and level of draw:

year-month-day + level
example:
2016-12-22 - 01
E24: DESCRIO DAS OPERAES:
F6: NOME DA PEA
F8: CODIGO POLISTAMPO
F10: DATA DE REVISO DO DESENHO
F67: INSERIR CROQUI

OU FOTO DA PEA:
H49: DESCREVER O INSTRUMENTO A

SER UTILIZADO NA MEDIO DA
CARACTERSTICA:
J6: PESO DA PEA
J8: DATA REVISO DO OCUMENTO
J10: DATA DE INICIO DESENVOLVIMENTO
J12: Cd. Interno do compnente

January February /January /January /February Janeiro /January
February March /February /February /March Fevereiro /February
March April /March /March /May Maro /March
April May /April /April /April Abril /April
May June /May /May /June Maio /May
June July /June /June /July Junho /June
July August /July /July /August Julho /July
August September/August /August /September Agosto /August
SeptemberOctober /September /Septembe/October Setembro /September
October November /October /October /November Outubro /October
November December /November /November/December Novembro /November
December January /December /December/January Dezembro /December
1 /January
2 /February
3 /March
4 /April
5 /May
6 /June
7 /July
8 /August
9 /September
10 /October
11 /November
12 /December
SCHE
Product Name: Date of draw review:: Customer:
LEGEND X FORESEEN ON GOING STARTED BEHIND SCHEDULE REPLANED
STAGES TO PROCESS DEVELOPMENT YEAR/ MONTH 2016 /May 2016 /June 2016 /July 2016 /August
WEEK 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
RESPONSIBLE
STAGE 1 - PLAN AND TO DEFINE THE PROGRAM
1.1 INPUS OF CUSTOMER:
1.1.1 MACKET RESEARCH
1.1.2 HISTORY OF QUALITY ASSURANCE
1.1.3 EXPERIENCE TEAM OF DEVELOPMENT
1.2 BUSINES PLAN / ESTRATGY OF MARKETING
1.3 DATE BENCHMARK OF PRODUCT AND PROCESS
1.4 PREMISSAS OF PRODUCT AND PROCESS
1.5 STUDIES OF THE PRODUCT REBIALITY
1.6 INPUTS OF CUSTOMER (RQ) (RP) (RC)
1.7 PROJETCTS OBJECTIVES
1.8 GOALS OF RELIABILITY AND QUALITY (RQ)
1.9 FEEDSTOCK PRELIMINARY LIST
1.10 FLOW CHART PRELIMINARY PROCESS
1.11 PRELIMINARY LIST OF FEATURES EPECIAL PRODUCT AND PROCESS (RC)
1.12 PRODUCT WARRANT PLAN

CUSTOMERS DOCUMENTS
SCHE
WEEK 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
1.13 CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF APQP PHASE OF CLOSING
STAGE 2 - PROJECT AND DEVELOPMENT PRODUCT
2.1 ANALYSIS OF METHOD AND DESIGN OF FAILURE OF PROJECT
2.2 PROJECT TO MANUFACTURABILITY AND ASSEMBLER
2.3 PROJECT CHECK
2.4 PROJECT CRITICAL ANALISYS
2.5 PROTOTYPE MANUFACTURING
2.6 ENGENEERINGS DRAW (INCLUDE MODEL 3D) (RP)
2.7 ENGENEERINGS ESPECIFICATIONS (RP)
2.8 FEEDSTOCK ESPECIFICATION
2.8.1 PURCHASE ORDERS ISSUINGS TO FEEDSOTCK AND COMPONENTS
2.9 MODIFICATIONS DRAWING AND ESPECIFICATIONS
2.10 REQUEST TO NEW MACHINES, TOOL AND PLANTS (RP)

SCHE
WEEK 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
2.11 SPECIAL FEATURES TO THE PRODUTCT AND PROCESS (RC)
2.12 REQUESTTO MEANS MEASUREMENT AND EQUIPAMENT OF TESTS (RP)
2.13 COMMITMENT OF TEAN WHITH THE FEASIBILITY
2.14 PREPARATION PLAN AND MONITORING FOR PRODUCTION

CUSTOMERS DOCUMENTS

SCHE
WEEK 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
STAGE 3 - PROJECT AND DEVELOPMENT TO PROCESS
3.1 STANDART PACKING (RQ)
3.2 CRITICAL ANALISYS SYSTEM TO THE QUALITY OF PRODUCT AND PROCESS
3.3 FLOW CHART PROCESS
3.4 LAYOUT OF MANUFATURING PLANT
3.5 FEATURES MATRIX
3.6 ANALISYS OF MODE AND EFECT TO THE FAILURE PROCESS (PFMEA) (RQ)
3.7 PLANO DE CONTROLE DE PR-LANAMENTO
3.8 PROCESS INSTRUCTIONS
3.9 ANALISYS PLAN OF MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
3.10 PRELIMINARY STUDIES PLAN OF CAPABILITY PROCESS
3.11 RECEIVING FEEDSTOCKS OR COMPNENTS
3.12 TOOL VALIDATION (1Try-out)
3.12.1 TOOL VALIDATION (2Try-out)

SCHE
WEEK 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
3.13 DOCUMENTATION UPDATE (Flow chart, PFMEA, control Plan)
3.14 PREPARATION PLAN AND MONITORING FOR PRODUCTION

CUSTOMERS DOCUMENTS
STAGE 4 - VALIDAO DO PRODUTO E PROCESSO
4.1 FIRST PRODUCTION PILOT
4.2 MESUREMENT SYSTEM EVALUATION (M.S.A.)
4.3 STUDIES PROCESS CAPABILITY (Ppk)
4.4 PRODUCTION PART APPROVAL
4.5 PRE PRODUCTION AUDIT (RQ)
4.6 PACK EVALUATION
4.7 CONTROL PLAN TO PRODUCTION
4.8 TRAINING OF OPERATORS
4.9 UPDATING DOCUMENTATIONS (Flow Chart, PFMEA, Control Plan)
4.10 PREPARATION AND MONITORING PLAN FOR THE PRODUCTION

SCHE
WEEK 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
CUSTOMERS DOCUMENTS
FASE 5 - RETROALIMENTAO, AVALIAO E AO CORRETIVA
5.1 REDUCE VARIATION
5.2 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
5.3 DELIVERY AND SERVICE
5.4 LEANERD LESSONS AND BEST PRATICES
5.5 PREPARATION AND MONITORING PLAN FOR THE PRODUCTION
DOCUMENTOS DE CLIENTES
Date preparation: Responsibile: Multifuntional Team:
THIAGO, RAFAEL, A
FQ7.1-01 REV.03
SCHEDULE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
FINISHED N/A NOT APPLICABLE RQ QUALITY RISK RP DEADLINE RISK RC COST RISK
/August 2016 /September 2016 /October 2016 /November 2016 /December 2017 /January 2017 /February 2017 /March 2017 /May ACTIONS / COMMENTS
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Review:
THIAGO, RAFAEL, ANTONIO CESAR, DIEGO, ANTONIO CARLOS, ROBSON, MARCELO Date:
ACTIONS / COMMENTS
ACTIONS / COMMENTS
ACTIONS / COMMENTS
ACTIONS / COMMENTS
ACTIONS / COMMENTS
ACTIONS / COMMENTS
ADVANCED QUALITY PLANING DATE
(APQP) 5/5/2016
PART NUMBER: 0 CUSTOMER: 0 DRAW DATE: 12/30/1899
NAME: 0 REVIEW DATE: 12/30/1899
CUSTOMER ENTRY REQUIREMENTS

Draw of part / feedstock specification
FQ 7.1-04 REV. 02
A11: Informar todos requisitos informado pelo cliente por meio dos desenhos especificaes e testes
ADVANCED QUALITY PLANING Date
(APQP)
CUSTOMER ESPECIFIC REQUEST

(CHECK IN HAND, CUSTOMER DOCUMENTS OR INFORMATION TAKEN DURING THE DEVELOPMENT)
FQ 7.1-05 REV 02
A13: Verificar se o cliente possui algum requisito especfico para ser
atendido
FEEDSTOCK DATE
PRELIMINARY LIST
SPECIAL FEATURE SAFETY CARACTERSTIC REGULATORY FEATURE

S R
INDEX FEEDSTOCK TYPE SUPPLIER
RESPONSIBLE:
FQ 7.1-16-REV.01
A11: Descrio do tem
C11:
Descrio da materia prima, componentes e acabamento
K43:
Informar nome do responsvel pelas informaes.
Y11: Indicar o nome dos possveis fornecedores, para cada tem.

KEY LIST CONTACTS AT
POLISTAMPO
PART NUMBER: 0 CUSTOMER: 0 DRAW DATE:
NAME: 0 REVIEW DATE:
CONTACTS OCUPATION E-MAIL PHONE
THIAGO DANTAS ENGEENERING MANAGER desenhos@polistampo.com.br 55 (11)4066-9300
MARCOS F. JUNIOR PLANT MANAGER junior@polistampo.com.br 55 (11)4066-9300
DIEGO MALLAMAN QUALITY MANAGER diego@polistampo.com.br 55 (11)4066-9300
ROBSON WILLIANS LOGISTIC MANAGER pcp@polistampo.com.br 55 (11)4066-9300
WAGNER VITOR BUSINES wagner@polistampo.com.br 55 (11)4066-9300
LUIZ OSCAR BUSINES luizoscar@polistampo.com.br 55 (11)4066-9300
SIMMACO DIRECTOR simmaco@polistampo.com.br 55 (11)4066-9300

12/30/1899
12/30/1899
066-9300
066-9300
066-9300
066-9300
066-9300
066-9300
066-9300
CHECK LIST OF CRITICAL ANALYSIS APQP
STAGE 1: PLAN AND TO DEFINE THE PROGRAM
Customer: 0
Draw Number: 0 Date Reviwe: 12/30/1899
Part Number: 0 Index Review: 0
Part Name: 0 No. Polistampo: 0
1.1- CUSTOMER VOICE YES NOT N/A
1.1.1 - They were sent by the customer information pertaining to Market Research Product?
1.1.2 - were sent by the Quality Assurance historical information client of similar products?
1.1.3 - were sent by the client information on events and experiences of the project of similar products?
1.2 - BUSINESS PLAN AND MARKETING STRATEGIES YES NOT N/A
1.2.1 - were sent by the business plan of the customer information or product marketing strategy?
1.3 - PRODUCT BENCHMARK DATA / PROCESS YES NOT N/A
1.3.1 - were sent by the client information on Benchmark Products / Similar processes?
1.3.2 - the spreadsheet lessons learned was verified in order to minimize negative impacts on the project?
1.4 - PRODUCT / PROCESS PREMISES YES NOT N/A
1.4.1 - Drawings and other product specifications are available and as previously budgeted?
1.5 - PRODUCT RELIABILITY STUDIES YES NOT N/A
1.5.1 - were sent by the customer information about product reliability studies?
1.6 - CUSTOMER IMPUTS YES NOT N/A
1.6.1 - Drawings and other specifications are set and frozen?
1.6.2 - Mathematical model was provided by the customer?
1.6.3 - The product can be manufactured according to the tolerances specified in the drawing?
1.6.4 - There is need for specific controls required by the customer?
1.6.5 - Drawings and other specifications requested recording for traceability?
1.6.6 - It was suggested to the client some form of recording for traceability of the product which is not specified?
1.7 - PROJECT OBJECTIVE YES NOT N/A
1.7.1 - The goals set for the project meet the requirements specified in CUSTOMER'S VOICE?
1.8 - RELIABILITY AND QUALITY GOALS YES NOT N/A
1.8.1 - It was verified the reliability and quality goals as specific requirement?
1.8.2 - We can meet all the targets set?
1.8.3 - Is there a plan to meet the targets set?
1.9 - LIST OF PRELIMINARY MATERIALS YES NOT N/A
1.9.1 - the use of Raw Materials / existing components is possible?
1.9.2 - the preliminary list of materials / components with potential suppliers has been drawn up?
1:10 - PRELIMINARY FLOWCHART YES NOT N/A
1.10.1 - it was analyzed the preliminary flow described in the quotation?
1:11 - PRELIMINARY IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIAL FEATURES OF PRODUCT / PROCESS YES NOT N/A
1.11.1 - The customer's design establishes special features?
1.11.2 - The manufacturing process requires special features?
1:12 - PRODUCT WARRANTY PLAN YES NOT N/A
1.12.1 - was informed of key project dates?
1.12.2 - the key contacts were defined Polistampo for the project?
1.12.3 - There is a preliminary proposal for the packaging of the product?
1.12.4 - Is there any pendency in relation to meeting the targets or program requirements informed by the customer
CRITICAL ANALISYS - STAGE 1
1 - PENDING / ACTIONS:
2 - COMENTS:
3 - PARTICIPANTS:
1 - Is there any pendency, which makes the closing of Phase 1? YES NOT DATE:
2 - You can start or continue the progress of Phase 2? YES NOT
ENENERING QUALITY PURCHASING LOGISTC/ MANUFATURING PLANT MANAGER
CHECK LIST OF CRITICAL ANALYSIS APQP
STAGE 1: PLAN AND TO DEFINE THE PROGRAM
Customer: 0
Draw Number: 0 Date Reviwe: 12/30/1899
Part Name: 0 No. Polistampo: 0
FQ-7.1-44 REV. 02
COMMITMENT TEAM
WITH PRODUCT FEASIBILITY
PART NUMBER: 0 CUSTOMER: 0
NAME: 0 REVIEW DATE: 12/30/1899 START DATE: 5/5/2016
NEW PRODUCT X ENGENEERING MODIFICATION
CASE MODIFICATION, EXPLAIN:
CONSIDERAES SOBRE VIABILIDADE

Our product quality planning team considered the following issues, which are not intended
be fully included in the execution of a feasibility assessment.
The drawings and / or specifications provided were used as a basis for analyzing the ability to meet all
the specified requirements
All "no" answers are supported by comments identifying our concerns and / or changes
proposals to enable us to meet the specified requirements.
ITEM CONSIDERAES SIM NO N/A

The product is adequately defined (application requirements, etc.) to enable their
1 viability? (Check if it is known the application of item considering assembly, settlement
mounted device, molds, against piece, requirements
The engineering design specifications can be met, as described? (Check if the design
2 specifications and standards can be antendidas without further consideration to what
was quoted)
The product can be manufactured according to the tolerances specified in the drawing?
3
(Check if the process is able to meet the defined specification in the drawing)
The product can be manufactured with CPK's that meet the specifications? (Check
4 through similar items if the key features / reviews can be produced in a manner capable
Cpk> 1.67)
There is sufficient capacity for the manufacture of the product? (Check for equipment
5
capable and available hours to absorb the desired volume of production)
6 The design allows the use of efficient materials handling techniques?
THE PRODUCT CAN BE MANUFACTURED WITHOUT INCURRED IN UNEXPECTED AS:

7 Costs of processing equipment?
8 Tooling costs?
9 Alternative manufacturing method?
10 It is necessary statistical process control for the product?
11 Statistical process control is currently being used in similar products?
WHERE IS USED STATISTICAL CONTROL PROCESS IN SIMILAR PRODUCTS:
12 Os Processos estao Sobre Controle e estveis?
13 The CPK are more than 1,33?
CONCLUSO:
VIABLE X N VIABLE - The product can be manufacturing with the specification, wihtout resctrict?
VIABLE N VIABLE - Recommended changes (see annex)
VIABLE N VIABLE - Review of the required project for the manufacture of the product within the
specified requirements.
TEAN APPROVATION (NAME ANS SIGNATURE) DATE TEAN APPROVATION (NAME ANS SIGNATURE) DATE
Junior 5/5/2016 Wagner 5/5/2016
Thiago 5/5/2016 Robson 5/5/2016
Diego 5/5/2016 Roberto 5/5/2016
FQ 7.1-02 REV. 01
A5: Informar se desenvolvimento de produto novo ou alterao de engenharia.
A28: O mtodo de manufatura nico e no permite alterao.
A29: Com base em produtos similares julgamos no ser necessrio

:
A30: Somente estudo preliminar na submisso do PPAP e

periodicamente conforme procedimento:
A43: Indicar os nomes dos

responsveis pelas atividades:
C20: Verificar os dados para certificar que podem ser atendidos:
C21: Verificar as tolerncias do desenho para confirmar se podem ser atendidas

:
C22: em analogia a produtos similares julgamos que sim:
C23: A produo e o PCP devem avaliar a capacidade de fabricao:
C24: Os produdos de nossa linha de produo utilizam as tecnicas convencionais de manuseio.
C26: No aplicavel
C28: O mtodo de manufatura nico e no permite alterao.
C29: Com base em produtos similares julgamos no ser necessrio

:
C30: Somente estudo preliminar na submisso do PPAP e

periodicamente conforme procedimento:
D4: nome da pea:
E3: Numero da pea:
E37: Selecionar o campo que indica a condio da viabilidade.
L43: indicar a data de avaliao:
T3: Nome do cliente:
T4: Data de reviso do desenho:

FEATURES LIST
ESPECIALS OF PRODUCT AND PROCESS
PART NUMBER: 0 CUSTOMER 0 DRAW DATE
NAME: 0 REVIEW DATE:
SPECIAL FEATURE SAFETY CARACTERSTIC REGULATORY FEATURE

S R
INDEX FEATURE DATE PROCESS FEATURE PRODUCT FEATURE
RESPONSIBLE: SIGN:
FQ 7.1-06 - REV. 02
FEATURES LIST
SPECIALS OF PRODUCT AND PROCESS
12/30/1899
12/30/1899
REGULATORY FEATURE
KIND
ADVANCED PLAN DATE
OF QUALITY (APQP)
PART NUMBER: 0 CUSTOMER 0 DRAW DATE 12/30/1899
TOOLS AND DEVICES
RESPONSIBLE DATE:
FQ 7.1-11 - REV. 01
ADVANCED PLAN DATA
OF QUALITY (APQP) 5/5/2016
PART NUMBER: 0 CUSTOMER 0 DRAW DATE 12/30/1899

ADDITIONAL MEASURING INSTRUMENTS

FQ 7.1-15 -REV.01
A12: Relao dos dispositivos e instrumentos de medio que por ventura sejam necessrios.
PREPARATION PLAN AND MONITORING FOR PRODUCTION
CUSTOMER: 0
DRAW NUMBER: 0 REVIEW DATE: 12/30/1899
PART NUMBER: 0 INDEX: 0
NAME: 0 No Polistampo: 0
Pontos Chaves do Projeto
Factors Influencing the Preparation of Production (All numbers are cumulative numbers) Comments
TRY-OUT C. PILOTO SOP
Goal of process for each key point 0 2 2 .
Number People to
% the goal against the goal planned 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Request team realization to the Realization
process
L % the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
A % the finish goal 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
B
O
R % the goal against the goal planned 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Number People
Habilit Level Realization
training
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
% the finish goal 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Numer of tests
Realization
Test achievements Approved
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Number of
Capacit of Process FEATUREs Realization
Approved
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Goal of process for each key point 80% 99% 99% .

% Parts OK
Parts OK Realization
(without rework)
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
M Goal of process for each key point 90% 100% 100% .
A
T % the goal against the goal planned 0% 0% 90% 100% 100%
E % of Parts OK
Proportion OK Realization
R (Including Rework)
I % the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
A
L % the finish goal 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Goal of process for each key point 0 0 0
N Subcomponents
Aprovation Realization
Approved
Subcomponents
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
K % the finish goal 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
E Goal of process for each key point 2 2 2 As an indication of planning to meet the requirements of APSECTO
APPEARANCE parts will be used (1 - Do not care the surface appearance on
Y the key point of the project and 2 - surface appearance of compliance in the
% the goal against the goal planned 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% project key point).
P Appearence of Parts
Part Suface Realization
O Produced
.
I % the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
N
T % the finish goal 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
S Goal of process for each key point 0 0 0 As an indication of planning for meeting requirements for RECORDING OF
PARTS will be used. (0 - Ask free recording, 1 - No recording services on the
piece in the key point of the project and 2 - recording service in part in the
% the goal against the goal planned 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% project key point)
Parts Produced With
Reccording in Parts Realization
reccording
.
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Production complete Number of tool
Realization
of tools comppletes
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Production complete Number of devices
M Realization
of devices comppletes
A % the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Q
U % the finish goal 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
I Goal of process for each key point 1 1 1 .
N
A % the goal against the goal planned 0% 0% 100% 100% 100%
S Number of Autorized
Autorized Plants Realization
Plants
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Time of cicle
Cicle time Realization
realized
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

System Pack Ammount Pack
Realization
Evaluation Evaluated
M % the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
E
O Goal of process for each key point 0 3 3 .
D
O % the goal against the goal planned 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Number of work
Work Instruction Realization
instruction
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Score 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
KEY POINT OF PROJECT: PLAN (STAGE 2) REVIEW DATE:
ENGENEERING QUALITY SALES MANUFATURING LOGISTC MANAGER PLANT

Name
Signature
FQ 7.1-52 Rev. 01
Check Lista Critical Analisys Of APQP
STAGE 2: Project and Developmento of Product
Customer: 0
Draw Number: 0 Review date: 12/30/1899
Part Number: 0 Index: 0
Name: 0 N Polistampo: 0
2.1 - ANALYSIS METHOD AND DESIGN OF FAULT EFFECT YES NOT
2.1.1 - It was sent by DFMEA customer product?
2.2 - DESIGN FOR manufacturability AND ASSEMBLY YES NOT
2.2.1 - Concept of the estimated process quotation is functional to meet the specifications and expectations of Customer?
2.3 - PROJECT VERIFICATION YES NOT
2.3.1 - was sent by the client some verification of product design?
2.4 - ANALYSIS CRITICAL PROJECT YES NOT
2.4.1 - was sent by the client some consideration on project requirements / Functional product?
2.4.2 - It was requested by the customer a result of computer simulations?
2.4.3 - was sent by the client some results of bench tests?
2.5 - PROTOTYPE CONSTRUCTION - (CONTROL PLAN) YES NOT
2.5.1 - was requested by the customer making prototypes?
2.5.2 - Prototypes Control Plan was established?
2.5.3 - The prototypes were built in sufficient numbers to evaluation?
2.6 - ENGINEERING DRAWINGS (INCLUDING MATHEMATICAL DATA) YES NOT
2.6.1 - It was verified that 2D drawings are compatible with 3D models?
2.6.2 - The drawings include the part alignment information, checkpoints and general tolerances?
2.7 - ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION YES NOT
2.7.1 - was sent by the client any acceptance criteria?
2.8 - MATERIAL SPECIFICATION YES NOT
2.8.1 - Material has some special feature?
2.8.2 - The special characteristics of the material have been identified and registered for use in the next stages of the
project?
2.8.3 - was issued a purchase order for materials / components?
2.9 - CHANGES IN DESIGN AND SPECIFICATIONS YES NOT
2.9.1 - There is a need to change / modify any design or specification?
2.9.2 - The change / modification has been communicated to all affected areas?
2:10 - REQUIREMENTS FOR NEW EQUIPMENT, TOOLS AND FACILITIES YES NOT
2.10.1 - the purchase of new equipment will be needed?
2.10.2 - The purchase of new equipment meet the pre-established events of the project?
2.10.3 - the purchase of tooling / mounting devices will be needed?
2.10.4 - was performed checklist production capacity of tooling?
2.10.5 - It was provided all necessary information and specifications to begin the design of tooling and control devices?
2.10.6 - was performed checklist stamping simulation approval?
2.10.7 - It was verified the necessity and feasibility of installing some Poka-Yoke system?
2.10.8 - is used a Poka-Yoke system?
2.10.9 - any new installation will be necessary?
2:10:10 - The new facilities are implemented and available to meet the pre-established events to the project?
2:10:11 - the acquisition of welding devices will be needed?
2:10:12 - all necessary information and specifications were available to start the project of weld devices?
2:11 - FEATURES SPECIAL PRODUCT AND PROCESS YES NOT
2.11.1 - was carried out the analysis on the special characteristics of the product indicated by the customer?
2:12 - REQUIREMENTS FOR MEASURING MEANS / TEST EQUIPMENT YES NOT
2.12.1 - the purchase of an instrument / test equipment will be required?
2.12.2 - will be made control device for the product?
2.12.3 - It was provided all necessary information and specifications to start the control device design?
2:13 - TEAM COMMITMENT TO THE VIABILITY YES NOT
2.13.1 - was prepared team's commitment to sustainability?
2.13.2 - The client has specific form to complete and sign the viability?
2.13.3 - a timetable for the project was drawn up?
2.13.4 - The client requests the submission schedule for approval?
2.13.5 - The schedule was submitted to the customer for approval?
2:14 - PREPARATION AND PRODUCTION OF MONITORING YES NOT
2.14.1 - was prepared the Preparation and Monitoring Plan for Production?
2.14.2 - The client has specific form of the Preparation and Monitoring Plan for Production?
2.14.3 - The client requests the submission of the Preparation and Monitoring Plan for Production for approval?
2.14.4 - customer has been made to the Preparation and Monitoring Plan for Production?
1 - PENDING / ACTIONS:
2 - COMMENTS:
STAGE 2: Project and Developmento of Product
Customer: 0
Draw Number: 0 Review date: 12/30/1899
Part Number: 0 Index: 0
Name: 0 N Polistampo: 0
3 - PARTICIPANTES:
1 - Is there any pendency, which makes the closing of STAGE 2? YES NOT DATE:
2 - You can start or continue the progress of the Phase 3? YES NOT
ENGEENERING QUALITY PURCHASE LOGISTC/ MANUFACTURE PLANT MANAGER
FQ-7.1-45 REV. 03
AGE 2: Project and Developmento of Product
0
12/30/1899
0
0
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
AGE 2: Project and Developmento of Product
0
12/30/1899
0
0
PLANT MANAGER
FLOW CHART PROCESS
PRODUCT CODIG CUSTOMER PAGE:
0 0 0 55/96 .
PREPARED BY: DATE: DATE REVIEW DRAW: INDEX
12/30/1899 12/30/1899
SPECIAL FEATURES SAFETY FEATURES REGULATORY FEATURES

S R
CONTAINMENT FEATURE KIND
STEP OPERATION PROCESS MOVE STOCK INSPECT. DECISION FEATURES KEY PRODUCTS MEAND OF CONTROL
IQ. 8.3-04
REVIEW HISTORIC
FQ-7.1-08 REV 02
FLOW CHART PROCESS
PRODUCT CODIG CUSTOMER PAGE:
0 0 0 56/96 .
PREPARED BY: DATE: DATE REVIEW DRAW: INDEX
12/30/1899 12/30/1899
SPECIAL FEATURES SAFETY FEATURES REGULATORY FEATURES

S R
CONTAINMENT FEATURE KIND
STEP OPERATION PROCESS MOVE STOCK INSPECT. DECISION FEATURES KEY PRODUCTS MEAND OF CONTROL
IQ. 8.3-04
Review
No Description
data
FQ-7.1-08 REV 02
A4: nome do produto
linkado ao cadastro
A6: nome do elaborador

57/96 .
A14: nmero da operao
FQ-7.1-08 REV 02
CONTROL PLAN
Customer: part Number: Drawing date: Review date: Prototype Pre Lauche Production Page58/96
0 0 12/30/1899 12/30/1899
Part Name Cd. Polistampo Supplier Name: Cd. Fornecedor Review Date
0 0 Polistampo Industria Metalurgica Ltda -
Team Supplier Aprovation/Date/Sigin Document Number Review: Start Date
0
Engeneering of Customer Approval, If request Customer Quality Approval, If Request Key Contact / Phone
Thiago Dantas / 11 - 4066 9300
Orther Approval/ Date, If Resques Orther Approval/ Date, If Resques
- -
SPECIAL FEATURE SAFETY FEATURE REGULATORY FEATURE

] S R
Numero Nome da pea/ processo Mquina, dispositivo Caractersticas Mtodo Plano
pea/ ou Padro, ferramentas Tol./ Espec. do Tcnica de Amostra Mtodo de Manuteno Poka Yoke de
Processo Nome da operao para produo N Produto Processo Car. Prod. / Proc. Aval./ Medio Tam. Freq. Controle Reao
INSPEO DE LAY OUT - CONFORME PQ 8.2- ITEM 5.12

FQ-7.1-12 REV 01 S.R=SEM REGISTRO I/F=INICIO E FINAL DE LOTE AUDITORIA DE PROCESSO CONFORME PQ 8.2 - ITEM 5.10
AUDITORIA DE PRODUTO CONFORME PQ 8.2 - ITEM 5.8
CONTROL PLAN
Customer: part Number: Drawing date: Review date: Prototype Pre Lauche Production Page59/96
0 0 12/30/1899 12/30/1899
Part Name Cd. Polistampo Supplier Name: Cd. Fornecedor Review Date
Team Supplier Aprovation/Date/Sigin Document Number Review: Start Date
0
Engeneering of Customer Approval, If request Customer Quality Approval, If Request Key Contact / Phone
Thiago Dantas / 11 - 4066 9300
Orther Approval/ Date, If Resques Orther Approval/ Date, If Resques
- -

] S R
Numero Nome da pea/ processo Mquina, dispositivo Caractersticas Mtodo Plano
pea/ ou Padro, ferramentas Tol./ Espec. do Tcnica de Amostra Mtodo de Manuteno Poka Yoke de
Processo Nome da operao para produo N Produto Processo Car. Prod. / Proc. Aval./ Medio Tam. Freq. Controle Reao

Part Number: 0
CAPACITY STUDY PLAN OF THE PROCEEDINGS Customer: 0
Part Name: 0
(ITEM 3.10 OF APQP REFERENCE MANUAL)

S R
FEATURE KIND SPECIFICATION PROCESS:
INDEX QUESTIONS YES NOT COMMENDS AND RECOMENDED ACTIONS RESPONSIBLE DATE
STUDY OF FEATURE HAS TO ASSESS FUNCTION? DATE

1 SPECIAL FEATURE DEGNED BY CUSTOMER COLETAR 5 PEAS A CADA 5 MINUTOS Antonio 12/30/1899
NOT SPECIAL FEATURE DEGNED TO IMPROVEMENT STUDY 12/30/1899
2 STUDY WILL BE HELD IN PILOT PRODUCTION? COLETAR 5 PEAS A CADA 5 MINUTOS Antonio DATE
3 SPECIFY SUBGROUP SIZE AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY. COLETAR 5 PEAS A CADA 5 MINUTOS Antonio DATE
ESTUDO DE CAPABILIDADE POR VARIAVEL X/R 125
4 DEFINE STATISTICAL METHODS APPROPRIATE.
AMOSTRAS SUBGRUPO DE 5 Antonio DATE
5 EXISTE PROCESSO SIMILAR J ESTUDADO CPK E PPK? Antonio DATE
6 THERE IS SIMILAR CASE HAVE STUDIED CPK and PPK? Antonio DATE
7 THE STUDIES CONDUCTED DEMONSTRATE STABILITY? Antonio DATE
8 THE STUDIES CONDUCTED UP CAPACITY DEMONSTRATING 1.67? Antonio DATE
9 THE PROCESS REQUIRES LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP STUDY? Antonio DATE
10 THE PROCESS REQUIRES REACTION PLAN? RANC IF SO USE) Antonio DATE

COMMENTS
ASSINATURA RESPONSVEL PELO M.S.A

FQ 7.1-19-REV.01
A10: Relacionar as caracteristicas crticas indicadas pelo cliente para realizao dos estudos de capabilidade.
B18: Informar o tipo de caracterstica a avaliar:

Critica / especial / melhoria.
B21: informar quando ser efetuado o estudo.
B22: informar o tamanho do subgrupo e frequencia de coleta:

Geralmente 125amostras em
subgrupos de 05 ps com frequencia de acordo com o processo ou disponibilidade geralmente com a mesma frequencia de inspeo 5 ps / 2h.
B23: Definir o processo estatistico geralmente carta x / r
B24: informar se h algum processo similar que j se tenha realizado o estudo.
B25: Com base em estudos efetuados em peas similares indicar a tendencia ou realizar um estudo simulado com a tolerncia especificada.
B26: Com base em estudos de peas similares utilizando os instrumentos adequados observamos que os estudos geralmente indicam estabilidade.
B27: Com base nos estudos de peas similares todos apresentaram capa\cidade aceitvel. Quando as dimenses se apresentavam centralizadas dentro do tero mdio
da range.
B28: Geralmente este tipo de acompanhamento realizado quando o processo me mostra instvel ou com capacidade inferior a 1,67.
B29: Geralmente o plano de reao requerido quando o processo apresenta-se instvel ou com cpk inferior a 1,67.
E30: Indicar observaes que julgar pertinente.
M10: Inserir a simbologia referente ao tipo da caracteristica
P10: DESCREVER AS
CARACTERSTICAS CRTICAS INDICADAS NO
DESENHO:
S18: Indicar observaes que julgar necessrio.

AA10: Indicar o processo onde a caracterstica formada / controlada/ alterada.
AC18: Informar o nome do responsvel pelo estudo.
AC30: Assinatura pelo responsvel do estudo MAS.
AD1: Nmero da pea linkado ao cadastro.
AD2: Nome do cliente linkado ao cadastro.
AD3: Nome da pea linkado ao cadastro.
AG18: Data de planejamento.

PART NUMBER: 0
MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS PLAN CUSTOMER 0
PART NAME: 0
(ITEM 3.9 OF THE REFERENCE MANUAL APQP)
FEATURE: SPECIFICATION: PROCESS:
WITH M.S.A. PERIODIC
INDEX QUESTIONS YES NOT COMMENTS/ RECOMENDED ACTIONS RESPONSIBLE SCHEDULED
1 EQUIPMENT REQUIRED STUDY R & R? Antonio
2 THE ASSESSOR HAS INFLUENCE ON RESULT OF MEASUREMENT? Antonio 12/30/1899

HOW MANY AND WHAT PROVIDERS BE INVOLVED? HOW MANY TIMES THE SIZE TRES OPERADORES, MEDIR TRES VEZES CADA
3 SHALL BE REPEATED? PEA Antonio 12/30/1899
DESCRIPTION OF THE COLLECTION PROCESS OF SAMPLES FOR COMPLETION COLETAR DEZ AMOSTRAS NA SEQUENCIA DE
4 OF THE R & R: PRODUO E NUMERAR Antonio 12/30/1899
PROCEEDING TO BE RATED HAVE MINIMUM RESOLUTION OF A TENTH OF
5 TOLERANCE?
TODOS POSSUEM RESOLUO DE 0,01 mm Antonio 12/30/1899
ESTUDO DE R&R POR ATRIBUTOS METODO CURTO

6 MEASURING PROCESS DEFINITION: 10 AMOSTRAS TRES OPERADORES TRES MEDIES Antonio 12/30/1899
CADA AMOSTRA
DEFINITION OF RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING AND STUDY OF CONDUCT

7 (THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN AWARE OF SECTION 3 OF REFERENCE MANUAL RESPONSVEL Antonio Carlos Antonio 12/30/1899
MSA).
THE STUDY REVEALED THAT THE STUDY MEASURING SYSTEM IS CONSIDERED:
8 R&R < 10% Antonio 12/30/1899
ACEPTABLE CONDITIONAL ACCEPTABLE NOT ACCEPTABLE
9 THE REQUIRE MEASURING SYSTEM REACTION PLAN? (RANC IF SO USE) Antonio 12/30/1899
COMMENTS:
ASSINATURA RESPONSVEL PELO M.S.A

FQ 7.1-20-REV.01
A6: Relacionar as caractersticas a serem avaliadas.
Avaliar um de cada tipo de instrumento utilizado para dimensionar a pea.
B18: Informar se ser requerido estudo para o instrumento
B19: Geralmente se o avaliador no for imparcial poder sugestionar o avaliado.
B20: dois ou trs avaliados repetindo duas vezes a medio. Informar o nome dos avaliados.
B21: Coletar dez amostras na sequencia da produo e numerar na mesma sequncia.
B22: O instrumento dever ter preciso de um dcimo da tolerncia especificada.
B23: Medir as dez amostras aleatoriamente anotando o valor, repetir as medies e anotar os valores.O avaliado no dever observar o resultado da primeira medida.
B24: Indicar o nome do responsvel pelo estudo .(Deve ter conheciento do manual MSA 3 ed.
B25: Relatar o resultado dos estudos aps o estudo efetuado.
B26: caso o resusltado dos estudo no sejam aceitavei elaborar um plano de ao.
E27: Indicar comentrios que julgar necessrio a atividade.
P6: Indicar as especificaes das caracteristicas a avaliar.
AA6: Informar o instrumento utilizado para avaliao.
AC18: Informar o nome do responsvel pelo estudo.
AC27: Assinatura pelo responsvel do estudo MAS.
AD1: Nmero da pea linkado ao cadastro.
AD2: Nome do cliente linkado ao cadastro.

AD3: Descrio da pea linkado ao cadastro.
AG18: Informar a data de elaborao do plano de anlise.

PREPARATION PLAN AND MONITORING FOR PRODUCTION
CUSTOMER: 0
DRAW NUMBER: 0 REVIEW DATE: 12/30/1899
PART NUMBER: 0 INDEX: 0
NAME: 0 No Polistampo: 0
Pontos Chaves do Projeto
Factors Influencing the Preparation of Production (All numbers are cumulative numbers) Comments
TRY-OUT C. PILOTO SOP
Number People to
Request team realization to the Realization
process
L % the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
A % the finish goal 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
B
O
R % the goal against the goal planned 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Number People
Habilit Level Realization
training
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Numer of tests
Realization
Test achievements Approved
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Number of
Capacit of Process FEATUREs Realization
Approved
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Goal of process for each key point 80% 99% 99% .

% Parts OK
Parts OK Realization
(without rework)
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
M Goal of process for each key point 90% 100% 100% .
A
T % the goal against the goal planned 0% 0% 90% 100% 100%
E % of Parts OK
Proportion OK Realization
R (Including Rework)
I % the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
A
L % the finish goal 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Goal of process for each key point 0 0 0
N Subcomponents
Aprovation Realization
Approved
Subcomponents
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
K % the finish goal 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
E Goal of process for each key point 2 2 2 As an indication of planning to meet the requirements of APSECTO
APPEARANCE parts will be used (1 - Do not care the surface appearance on
Y the key point of the project and 2 - surface appearance of compliance in the
% the goal against the goal planned 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% project key point).
P Appearence of Parts
Part Suface Realization
O Produced
.
I % the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
N
S Goal of process for each key point 0 0 0 As an indication of planning for meeting requirements for RECORDING OF
PARTS will be used. (0 - Ask free recording, 1 - No recording services on the
piece in the key point of the project and 2 - recording service in part in the
% the goal against the goal planned 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% project key point)
Parts Produced With
Reccording in Parts Realization
reccording
.
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Production complete Number of tool
Realization
of tools comppletes
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Production complete Number of devices
M Realization
of devices comppletes
A % the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Q
U % the finish goal 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
I Goal of process for each key point 1 1 1 .
N
A % the goal against the goal planned 0% 0% 100% 100% 100%
S Number of Autorized
Autorized Plants Realization
Plants
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Time of cicle
Cicle time Realization
realized
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

System Pack Ammount Pack
Realization
Evaluation Evaluated
M % the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
E
O Goal of process for each key point 0 3 3 .
D
O % the goal against the goal planned 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Number of work
Work Instruction Realization
instruction
% the goal plan 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Score 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
KEY POINT OF PROJECT: PLAN (STAGE 2) REVIEW DATE:
ENGENEERING QUALITY SALES MANUFATURING LOGISTC MANAGER PLANT

Name
Signature
FQ 7.1-52 Rev. 01
CHECK LIST OF CRITICAL PHASE APQP ANALYSIS 3
Design and Process Development
Customer: 0
Draw Number: 0 Review Date: 12/30/1899
Part Name: 0 N Polistampo: 0
3.1 - PACKAGING STANDARDS YES NOT N/A
3.1.1 - Was prepared packing plan?
3.1.2 - The customer has specific form for validation of the package?
3.1.3 - The packaging proposal was approved by the customer?
3.2 - CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF PRODUCT QUALITY SYSTEM / PROCESS YES NOT N/A
3.2.1 - All the documents needed to control and product registration are available for manufacturing?
3.3 - FLOW CHART OF THE PROCESS YES NOT N/A
3.3.1 - Building Process Flow for presentation at a meeting of FMEA?
3.3.2 - After completion of the try-out's update need Process Flow?
3.4 - LAYOUT FACILITIES YES NOT N/A
3.4.1 - Tools, assembly and control devices are completed and available for manufacturing?
3.4.2 - Equipment and facilities are prepared and available for production of the item?
3.5 - FEATURES MATRIX YES NOT N/A
3.5.1 - was identified and recorded in the matrix all the product features?
3.6 - ANALYSIS MODE EFFECT OF FAILURE PROCESS (FMEA) YES NOT N/A
3.6.1 - was prepared FMEA process?
3.6.2 - Aps realizao do try-out h necessidade de atualizao do FMEA do processo?
3.7 - PRE-RELEASE CONTROL PLAN YES NOT N/A
3.7.1 - was prepared the pre-launch control plan?
3.7.2 - After completion of the try-out is no need to update the control plan pre-release?
3.8 - INSTRUCTIONS PROCESS YES NOT N/A
3.8.1 - was elaborated the process instructions?
3.9 - MEASUREMENT SYSTEM ANALYSIS PLAN YES NOT N/A
3.9.1 - was prepared the analysis plan of the measuring system?
3:10 - PRELIMINARY STUDY PLAN CAPABILITY PROCESS YES NOT N/A
3.10.1 - it was prepared the preliminary study of process capability
3:11 - TOOLS OF VALIDATION AND WELDING DEVICE YES NOT N/A
3.11.1 - was performed try-out tooling and / or welding device?
3.11.2 - any corrections or modifications to the tooling and / or welding device will be necessary?
3.11.3 - The tooling is evaluated and released to the next event (Race Pilot)?
3.11.4 - The tooling has some Poka-Yoke system?
3.11.5 - the installation of some Poka-Yoke system will be necessary?
3.11.6 - The welding device is evaluated and released to the next event (Race Pilot)?
3.11.7 - The welding device has a Poka-Yoke system?
3:12 - PREPARATION AND PRODUCTION OF MONITORING YES NOT N/A
3.12.1 - In Plan Preparation and Monitoring for Production relevant information was updated this stage?
3.12.2 - The targets set in the Preparation and Monitoring Plan for Production for this phase of the project are being met?
1 - PENDINGS/ACTIONS:
2 - COMMENTS:
3 - PARTICIPANTS:
1 - Is there any pendency, which makes the closing of the Phase 3? YES NOT Date:
2 - You can start or continue the progress of the Phase 4? YES NOT
ENGENEERING QUALITY PURCHASING LOGISTC/ MANUFACTURE PLANT MANAGER
CHECK LIST OF CRITICAL PHASE APQP ANALYSIS 3
Design and Process Development
Customer: 0
Draw Number: 0 Review Date: 12/30/1899
Part Name: 0 N Polistampo: 0
FQ-7.1-46 REV. 02
CONTROL PLAN
CUSTOMER NAME: PART NUMBEER: DRAW DATE: REVIEW DATE: Prototype Pre Launch Manufacture page71/96
0 0 12/30/1899 12/30/1899
PART NAME Cd. Polistampo Nome do fornecedor Supplier Code: Review Date
TEAM Aprovao do fornecedor/Data/Visto Rewview Number od this Doccument Star Date:
0 12/30/1899
CUSTOMER ENGENEERING APPRVAL, if required Customer Quality Approval, If required Contact Key/ Phone
- - Thiago Dantas / 11 - 4066 9300
Orther Approval, if required Orther Approval, if required
- -
SPECIAL FEATURE SAFET FEATURE REGULATORY FEATURE

S R
Part Num Part Name / Process Machine, device FEATURES Mtodo Reaction
/ or Standarts, Tools for Tolerance/ specifications Means evaluation Sample Method of Maintenance Poka Yoke
Process Operation Name manufacture N Product Process FEAT to product and process and mesurement Amount Freq. Control Plan

CONTROL PLAN
CUSTOMER NAME: PART NUMBEER: DRAW DATE: REVIEW DATE: Prototype Pre Launch Manufacture page72/96
0 0 12/30/1899 12/30/1899
PART NAME Cd. Polistampo Nome do fornecedor Supplier Code: Review Date
TEAM Aprovao do fornecedor/Data/Visto Rewview Number od this Doccument Star Date:
0 12/30/1899
CUSTOMER ENGENEERING APPRVAL, if required Customer Quality Approval, If required Contact Key/ Phone
- - Thiago Dantas / 11 - 4066 9300
Orther Approval, if required Orther Approval, if required
- -
SPECIAL FEATURE SAFET FEATURE REGULATORY FEATURE

S R
Part Num Part Name / Process Machine, device FEATURES Mtodo Reaction
/ or Standarts, Tools for Tolerance/ specifications Means evaluation Sample Method of Maintenance Poka Yoke
Process Operation Name manufacture N Product Process FEAT to product and process and mesurement Amount Freq. Control Plan

N: 0
PART PRODUCTION OF APPROVAL Date: 12/30/1899
TEST RESULT DIMENSIONAL Page 1 de 1

Customer/ Supplier: Polistampo Part Number: 0
Supplier Code / salesman: --- Part Name: 0
Inspector Tool: Level Review: 0
Document of Review.: ----
With Control Plan
Laboratory Name: ---

S R
SPECIFICATIONS SPECIFICATIONS / TEST DATE AMOUNT RESULT DIMENSIONAL MEET

INDEX
FEAT. OK N OK
DIMENSIONALS LIMITS KIND TESTED
Cover forming reports are unacceptable for any test results
Signature Title: Date

FQ-7.1-18 Rev. 01
PART SUBMIT WARRANT
Part Name 0 Nmero da Pea: 0

Show Draing No.: 0 Part Number Supplier: 0
Level Change of Draw: 12/30/1899 Date 12/30/1899
Additional alteratios Engeneering: --- Date ---
Safety or Govern Reguratory: Yes Not Purchase Orther No.: --- Weigh (Kg): 0.0000
Control Service No.: --- Change Level Controle Assistance Plan: --- Date ---
ORGANIZATION INFORMATION: INFORMATION OF CUSTOMER'S PROPOSALS:
Polistampo / Wagner Victor

Suppless Name, code and Salesman Customers Name:
Rua Rio de Janeiro, 44

Address Parchaser, Number
Diadema SP 09961-730 Brasil Automotivo

City State Zip Code Country Aplication
Materials Report
The information on the content issues, required by the customer have been reported? yes Not N /A
This part contains some substance restricted or reportable use? yes Not
Sent by the IMDS or otherwise used by the client:
The polymer parts have been identified with appropriate ISO codes? yes Not N /A
REASON FOR SHIPPING (mark one):

Fisrt Shipping Change for the construction or Optional Material
Planing change Supplier Source of change or Material
Tool: Transferwork, Replacement, Retirement or Additional Change in Part Process
Correction of Discrepancy Produced parts in additional local
Inactive tools to over 1 year Other - Specify
REQUEST SUBMISSION LEVEL (mark one):

Level 1 - Gives only (and for designated appearance items), a Customer Submitted Appearance Approval Report.
Level 2 - Product Warranty and copies of the limited data to support sent to the client.
Level 3 - Product copies of warranty and support full data sent to the client.
Level 4 - Warranty and other requirements set by the client. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Level 5 - Product Warranty and copies of supporting data completely revised in supplier's production site.
RESULTADOS DO ENVIO:
The results for dimensions matrials tests appearence request estistic process pack
These results meet all design record requirements: Yes Not (If "No" - Required explanation)
Moulds / Cavity / Production Process:
DECLARATION:
I, hereby, affirm that the detailed examples in this warranty are representative of our parts, and are being
produced the appropriate requirements of the 4th edition of Part Approval Process Manual. I further authorize these
They were produced in production rate / hours. I noted below any changes in this statement.
EXPLANATION / COMMENTS:
Each customer belongs tool is labeled and numbered? Yes Not

Organization authorized signature: Date
Readable name: Pho+55 11 4066-9300 Fax: +55 11 4066-9300
Funcion: Email:
TO BE COMPLETED BY CUSTOMER (IF APPLICABLE)
Part Warranty provision Approves Rejected Orther
Customer Signature: Data:

Name: Customer tracking number (optional)
FQ 7.1-21-REV.00
CHECK LIST OF NEW PARTS OPERATION TRAINING
Customer: 0 Number Polist.: 0
Part Number: 0 Numero da Op: 10
Part Name: 0 Descrio da Op: ESTAMPAR COMPLETO
RESPONSAVEL PELO TREINAMENTO:
VERIFICAO PONTOS CHAVES DA INSTRUO SIM NO
1 - O roteiro de execuo da operao est claro?

2 - Croqui / Fotos de Auxilio da Instruo: Esto de acordo com o seu proposito de auxiliar o roteiro de
execuo?
3 - O layout indicado na instruo est adequado a operao?
4 - Os utenslios a serem utilizados esto adequados a operao?
5 - O orientador do treinamento orientou sobre todas as duvidas pertinentes a operao?
VALIDAO DO TREINAMENTO
Estou de acordo com as informaes contidas na instruo acima mencionada, sendo assim estando apto a ser o
multiplicador destas informaes a todos os operadores envolvidos na execuo da operao, sendo evidenciado
o aplicao deste treinamento no formulario FQ 8.2-08.
Nome / Assinatura: Responsvel Turno Manh Data:
VERIFICAO PONTOS CHAVES DA INSTRUO SIM NO
1 - O roteiro de execuo da operao est claro?
2 - Croqui / Fotos de Auxilio da Instruo: Esto de acordo com o seu proposito de auxiliar o roteiro de execuo?
3 - O layout indicado na instruo est adequado a operao?
4 - Os utenslios a serem utilizados esto adequados a operao?
5 - O orientador do treinamento orientou sobre todas as duvidas pertinentes a operao?
VALIDAO DO TREINAMENTO
Estou de acordo com as informaes contidas na instruo acima mencionada, sendo assim estando apto a ser o
multiplicador destas informaes a todos os operadores envolvidos na execuo da operao, sendo evidenciado
o aplicao deste treinamento no formulario FQ 8.2-08.
Nome / Assinatura: Responsvel Turno Tarde Data:
FQ-7.1-49 REV. 00
N: 0
APROVAO DA PRODUO DA PEA Data: 12/30/1899
RESULTADOS DO TESTE DESEMPENHO Pagina 1 de 1
Cliente / Fornecedor: Polistampo Nmero da p.: 0

Codigo do fornecedor / vendedor: --- Nome da pea: 0
Fornecedor do Material: --- Nvel da reviso: 0
Especificao cliente cod. Fornecedor/vendedor Doc. Mudanas do Planej.: ---
Nome do Laboratorio: ---
FEATUREA ESPECIAL FEATUREA SEGURANA FEATUREA REGULAMENTAO

S R
ESPECIFICAO RESULTADOS TESTE DO

ESPECIFICAES / Caract. DATA QTDE
ITEM
DE TESTE REVISO FORNECEDOR / CONDIO DE OK N OK

LIMITES Tipo TESTE TESTADA TESTE
/ DATA
1 PEA NO REQUER NENHUM ENSAIO DE DESEMPENHO
Encobrir relatos de conformao so inaceitveis para qualquer resultado do teste.
ASSINATURA: TITULO: DATA: 12/30/1899

FQ-7.1-27 Rev. 01
N: 0
APROVAO DA PRODUO DA PEA Data: 0
RESULTADOS DO TESTE DO MATERIAL Pagina 1 de 1

Cliente / Fornecedor: Polistampo Nmero da p.: 0
Codigo do fornecedor / vendedor: --- Nome da pea: 0
Fornecedor do Material: Nvel da reviso: 0
Especificao cliente cod. Fornecedor/vendedor Doc. Mudanas do Planej.: ---
Nome do Laboratorio: 0
FEATUREA ESPECIAL FEATUREA SEGURANA FEATUREA REGULAMENTAO

S R
MATERIAL ESPECIF.
ESPECIFICAES / Caract. DATA QTDE RESULTADOS DIMENSIONAIS
ITEM
OK N OK
LIMITES Tipo TESTE TESTADA DA ORGANIZAO
N. / REVIS. /DATA
1 MATERIAL NBR 5915 EM - - NBR5915EM x
ESPECIF. N. /
REVIS. /DATA
Prop. Quimica %C - 0,12 Mx. - -
%Mn - 0,60 Mx. - -
%P - 0,030 Mx. - -
%S - 0,030 Mx. - -
%Al - 0,010 Min. - -
Prop. Mecanica LE: 140 - 280 Mpa - -

LR: 270 - 390 Mpa - -
AL: 30% min. - -
Encobrir relatos de conformao so inaceitveis para qualquer resultado do teste.
ASSINATURA: TITULO: Tecnico de Processos DATA:

FQ-7.1-54 Rev. 01
Auditoria de Pr Produo
Cliente / Fornecedor: 0
N do Desenho: 0 Nivel Reviso de Desenho: 0
N da Pea: 0 Data Reviso do Desenho: 12/30/1899
Descrio: 0 Cdigo Polistampo: 0
Legenda: OK = 100% dos requisitos atendidos / No OK = No atendimento a um ou mais requisitos
Criterio
No
INSTALAES Aplicvel SIM NO OBSERVAES
N
Os equipamentos atendem ao propsito do produto? (Mquina, equipamento de medio,

11
equipamento de ensaio, dispositivos) x
12 Os postos de inspeo atendem ao propsito do produto? x
13 Os equipamentos de medio esto devidamente calibrados? x
14 As operaes crticas, conforme requerido, possuem poka yoke? x
15 O try out do ferramental foi considerado satisfatrio? x

Criterio No
DESEMPENHO E MANUTENO Aplicvel SIM NO OBSERVAES
N
Os planos de aes referentes aos problemas de qualidade identificados no

21
desenvolvimento foram concluidos e sua eficcia foi verificada? x
22 H intrues de trabalho para cada operao? x
23 Os requisitos do Manual de fornecedores so atendidos? x

Criterio No
QUALIFICAO DOS OPERADORES Aplicvel SIM NO OBSERVAES
N
31 Os operadores esto treinados para a operao? x
32 H o controle de substituio dos operadores x

Criterio No
QUALIDADE X PROCESSO Aplicvel SIM NO OBSERVAES
N
41 O fluxo do processo est definido? x
42 H um Plano de controle para todas as operaes? x
43 Os registros esto mantidos conforme estabelecido? x
Observaes:
Resumo por item:

ndice de
No. Item OK No OK conformida Observaes
de
1 INSTALAES 5 100%
2 DESEMPENHO E MANUTENO 3 100%
3 QUALIFICAO DOS OPERADORES 2 100%
4 QUALIDADE X PROCESSO 3 100%
de critrios possveis 13 Nmero de critrios considerados 13 ndice de conformidade: 100% Nmero de pontos No OK
Nota: Critrio de Aprovao - 100% - APROVADO / 80% a 99% - APROVADO CONDICIONAL / < 80% - REPROVADO
Aprovado
(Apresentar
Na data: O PROCESSO FOI QUALIFICADO COMO: Aprovado X plano de Reprovado
ao
Ass. Lder do processo de qualificao:

FQ.7.1-43 - Rev. 03
CAPACIDADE PRODUTIVA DO PROCESSO
DADOS DA PEA
N da Pea: 0 Descrio da Pea: - Volume /Ano:
Desenho: 0 Reviso de Eng.: Projeto:
DADOS DO RUN @ RATE
DADOS DO PROCESSO DISPONIBILIDADE DE UTILIZAO DO EQUIPAMENTO / CLULA

N ndice % Set-up Ps/hora Horas de N de Horas Prod. Dias Eficincia % Carga Mquina
Descrio da Operao Ps/hora
OP de Refugo Qtd Ms min - Refugo Prod./Ano Turnos / Turno Uteis/ano % 0 Horas Outros Clientes Disponvel Soma
10 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 100% APROVADO

Com base nas informaes fornecidas acima, a POLISTAMPO se compromete em:
1) Atender o volume total ano informado neste documento, respeitando sempre, as variaes de produo conforme programa de remessa enviado pela rea de Logstica.
2) Tomar todas as aes necessrias para eliminar eventuais gargalos de produo apontados neste documento, visando sempre, o atendimento do programa de remessa enviado pela rea de Logstica. Os gargalos de produo foram
classificados conforme:
- Gargalo Amarelo: requer ao no mximo dentro de 02 meses (Alto Risco)
- Gargalo Vermelho: requer ao imediata (Altssimo Risco)
3) Re-submeter um novo estudo de Run @ Rate para a avaliao do cliente, asssim, que as aes para eliminar os Gargalos forem implementadas.
AES / COMENTRIOS
FORNECEDOR CLIENTE
Resultado do Run@Rate
APROVADO APROVADO
Nome
Responsvel - Produo Resultado do Run@Rate INTERINO
APROVADO Responsvel - Cliente REPROVAD
REPROVADO
INTERINO
Nome
Diretoria
FQ 7.1-58-REV. 01
Grfico de Controle Xbarra-R
Two sided spec (bilateral) One sided (MIN) One sided (MAX) Nmero de leituras p
'01 PSW'!A21 '07 CAV'!A6 '01 PSW'!H6 '01 PSW'!A6 '01 PSW'!A14 '01 PSW'!D10 '01 PSW'!A8
LOCATION Planta: DIADEMA Depto: QUALIDADE
PART Pea n.: 0 Descrio da pea: 0
Desenho n.: 0 Data desenho: 12/30/1899
TOOL N Ferramenta: --- Cavidade: 1
DIMENSION Descrio: Dimetro Unidade:
SPEC 137.4 PLUS 0.2
Lwr Spec Limit 137.2 NOMINAL 137.4
137.48
Average (X chart)
137
10
12
11
2
9
137.46
MDIAS
137.44
00,137
137.42 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
137.4
137.38
137
12
10
11
2
9
137.36
137.34
137.32
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Data Poi
Data Values UCLx AveX LCLx
0.18
000
Range (R chart)
0.16 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
0.14
0.12
0.1
00,000
0.08 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Data Values UCLr AveR LCLr
HISTOGRAM WITHOUT LIMITS HISTOGRAM WIT

Page 84 of 96 Filename: 372553995.xlsx Polistampo - Qualidade
25
90
Grfico de Controle Xbarra-R
25
90
85
21 21 80
20
20
70
16 LSL
15 60
15 14
50 137.2000
10 40
9
7 30
5 20
1 1 10 7
0
0 0
137.3315
137.3655
137.4165
137.4845
137.3485
137.3825
137.3995
137.4335
137.4505
137.4675
137.5015
0 0 0
137.08
137.16
137.24
137.32
137.4
S U B G R
n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 137.40 137.42 137.42 137.46 137.46 137.43 137.43 137.42 137.37 137.43
L 2 137.43 137.42 137.40 137.49 137.39 137.42 137.42 137.37 137.36 137.40
E 3 137.42 137.45 137.40 137.45 137.49 137.45 137.40 137.39 137.40 137.42
I 4 137.43 137.40 137.43 137.45 137.48 137.39 137.40 137.40 137.43 137.39
T 5 137.40 137.42 137.36 137.39 137.40 137.46 137.51 137.38 137.39 137.43
U
R
A
S
MDIA 137.416 137.422 137.402 137.448 137.444 137.43 137.432 137.392 137.39 137.414
AMPLITUDE 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.1 0.1 0.07 0.11 0.05 0.07 0.04
n 21 22 23 24 25
1 137.37 137.36 137.40 137.43 137.39
L 2 137.43 137.40 137.42 137.39 137.43
E 3 137.42 137.36 137.39 137.45 137.46
I 4 137.42 137.48 137.37 137.42 137.40
T 5 137.40 137.43 137.43 137.45 137.45
U
R
A
S
MDIA 137.408 137.406 137.402 137.428 137.426

AMPLITUDE 0.06 0.12 0.06 0.06 0.07
FQ 7.1-22-REV.00 NOTA: NO ESCREVER NADA NA REA AMARELA EM FUN

PROCESSO CAPAZ
Nmero de leituras por subgupo 5 PROCESS INFORMATION
Significant trends of data points: X Chart R Chart
QUALIDADE Data: Increasing RUN LENGTH 5 4
0 HOW MANY RUNS 1 1
12/30/1899 Decreasing RUN LENGTH 5 3
HOW MANY RUNS 1 1
mm Out of control limits 0 0
MINUS 0.2 Consecutive data points above avg. 4 3
Upr Spec Limit 137.6 Consecutive data points below avg. 5 3
Average (X chart)
19
21
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
22
23
24
25
11
0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
24
25
17
23
11
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Data Points
Range (R chart)
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
HISTOGRAM WITH LIMITS DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS VALUES

PROCESSO CAPAZ
Qtde de leituras 125
Limite Inferior Especificado (LSL) 137.2000
85 Nominal 137.4000
Limite Superior Especificado (USL) 137.6000
Soma Total 17,177.3300
Media das Mdias ( X ) 137.4186
Mximo encontrado 137.5100
USL Mnimo encontrado 137.3400
Leituras abaixo do especificado LSL 0.0000
leituras acima do especificado USL 0.0000
137.6000 Amplitude Mdia (R) 0.0768
Valor D2 n =5 2.3260
Upper capability index (CPU) 1.8309
33 Lower capability index (CPL) 2.2073
Capability index (Cp) 2.0191
Process Capability (Cpk) 1.8309
Capability ratio (CR) 0.4953
Std Deviation (n-1) 0.0334
7 Std Deviation (n) 0.0333
Variance (n-1) 0.0011
Variance (n) 0.0011
0 0 0 0 0 Performance index (Pp) 1.9936
137.16
137.24
137.32
137.4
137.48
137.56
137.64
137.72
Performance ratio (PR) 0.5016

Performance index (Ppk) 1.8078
U P O S
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
137.42 137.42 137.40 137.45 137.42 137.42 137.40 137.43 137.46 137.40
137.36 137.48 137.43 137.43 137.37 137.37 137.39 137.40 137.48 137.43
137.39 137.37 137.43 137.42 137.42 137.39 137.48 137.42 137.39 137.43
137.45 137.42 137.45 137.34 137.46 137.37 137.46 137.36 137.46 137.45
137.46 137.40 137.45 137.40 137.45 137.43 137.37 137.45 137.45 137.45
137.416 137.418 137.432 137.408 137.424 137.396 137.42 137.412 137.448 137.432
0.1 0.11 0.05 0.11 0.09 0.06 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.05
N O T A S
REA AMARELA EM FUNO DE FORMLAS EXISTENTES.

SUMRIO E APROVAO DO DATA
A .P.Q.P.
DESCRIO DO PRODUTO: NMERO DA PEA:
0 0
CLIENTE: PLANTA DE MANUFATURA:
0 Diadema
1- ESTUDO PRELIMINAR DA CAPACIDADE DO PROCESSO. REQUERIDO ACEITVEL PENDENTE *
PPK 1 1 ---
2-APROVAO DO PLANO DE CONTROLE PELO CLIENTE APROVADO: SIM NO DATA:

NO REQ.
3-CATEGORIA DAS CARACTERSTICAS DA AMOSTRA

INICIAL DE PRODUO: QUANTIDADE:
AMOSTRAS FEATUREAS ACEITVEL PENDENTE *

POR AMOSTRA
DIMENSIONAL 5 X #VALUE! ---
VISUAL 5 X #VALUE! ---
LABORATRIO 1 X #VALUE! ---
DESEMPENHO --- --- -- ---
4-ANLISE DO SISTEMA DE MEDIO: QUANTIDADE:
DISPOSITIVOS E INSTRUMENTOS: REQUERIDA ACEITVEL PENDENTE *

MSA 8 8 0
5-MONITORAMENTO DO PROCESSO: QUANTIDADE:
REQUERIDA ACEITVEL PENDENTE *

INSTRUES DE PROCESSO: 2 2 0
FOLHA DE PROCESSO: 1 1 0
INSTRUES VISUAIS: 1 1 0
6-EMBALAGEM / EXPEDIO: QUANTIDADE:
REQUERIDA ACEITVEL PENDENTE *

APROVAO DE EMBALAGEM 1 1 0
TESTE DE ENTREGA: 1 1 0
7-APROVAO:
QUALIDADE: COMPRAS:
Diego Roberto
DEPTO. COMERCIAL: PCP:
Wagner Robson
DEPTO TCNICO: DIR. INDUSTRIAL:
Sergio F. Junior
FQ.7.1-24-REV.00
A6: Nome da pea linkado ao cadastro.
A8: Nome do cliente linkado ao cadastro.
A13: Quando requerido pelo cliente indicar a condio e data da aprovao pelo mesmo, caso no seja requerido
informar que no aplicvel.
A21: Relacionar a quantidade de amostras (peas avaliadas), o nmero de caractersticas por pea, a quantidade
de caractersticas aceitaveis(Dentro da especificao) e o numero de pendncias (no ok ou no
avaliadas).Se houver pendncias elaborar plano de ao para acompanhamento do processo.
A22: Informar o nmero de amostras, caractersticas visuais ppor amostra, nmero de caractersticas aceitavei e
nmero de caractersticas pendentes.
No caso de pendncias elaborar plano de ao para acompanhamento do processo.
A23: Indicar o nmeros de amostras avaliadas em laboratrio quimico ou fsico (Certificado), nmero de
caractersticas por amostra, numero de caractersticas conforme especificao e nmero de caractersticas,
no aceitaveis ou pendentes por quaisquer motivos, neste caso elaborar plano de reao para
acompanhamento do processo.
A24: Indicar o nmero de amostras para avaliao do desempenho, a quantidade de caracteristicas por amostra, a
quantidade aprovada, ou aceitavel e a quantidade rejeitada ou pendente. No caso de pendncia elaborar
plano de ao para acompanhamento do processo.
A36: Relacionar a quantidade de instrues do processo( Plano por operaes) requeridas, aceitas e pendentes,
no caso de pendencia elaborar plano de ao para acompanhar o processo.
A37: Indicar a quantidade de folhas de processos requeridas, aceitaveis e pendentes se houver, no caso de
pendencias, elaborar plano de ao para acompanhar o processo.
A38: Relacionar as quantidades de instrues visuais requeridas, aceitas e pendentes. No caso de pendncias
elaborar plano de ao para acompanhar o processo.
A43: Indicar a quantidade de avaliao de embalagem requerida, aceitavel ou pendentes, no caso de pendncias
requerido elaborao de plano ce ao para acompanhar o processo.
A44: indicar a quantidade de teste de entrega requerido, aceitvel ou pendentes, no caso de pendncias elaborar
plano de ao para acompanhar o processo.
A46: Relacionar os nomes dos responsveis pela aprovao e coletar as assinaturas respectivas.
L6: Nmero da pea linkado ao cadastro.
L8: Indicar o local da planta de manufatura.
L11: Indicar o nmero de caractersticas indicadas no desenho.
L30: Informar a quantidade xe instrumento avaliados para medio das caractersticas especiais, a quantidade
aprovada e as pendentes se houverem. No caso de pendncias , elaborar plano de reao para
acompanhamento do processo.
P11: Indicar o numero de caractersticas avaliadas com cpk maior que 1,67.
U11: Indicar se h alguma pendencia com relao aos estudos ou se h estudo no realizado.
Caso haja pendncias ser necessrio elaborao de plano de ao para acompanhamento do processo.
V3: Indicar data de aprovao do APQP.

PLANO DE PREPARAO E MONITORAMENTO PARA A PRODUO
Cliente: 0
N do Desenho: 0 Data da Reviso: 12/30/1899
N da Pea: 0 Reviso: 0
Descrio: 0 N Polistampo: 0
Fatores que influenciam a Preparao da Produo (Todos os nmeros abaixo so nmeros Pontos Chaves do Projeto
Comentrios
acumulativos) TRY-OUT C. PILOTO SOP
Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 0 2 2 .
Numero de Pessoas
% do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Time Requerido Necessarias para Realizao #REF! 2
Realizar o Processo
H % do objetivo planejado 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
O % do objetivo final 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
M
E
M % do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Numero de Pessoas
Nvel de Habilidade Totalmente Realizao #REF! 2
Treinadas
% do objetivo planejado 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
% do objetivo final 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%

Realizao de Numero de Testes
Testes Aprovados
Realizao #REF! 1

Nmeros de
Capacidade do
Processo
Caractersticas Realizao #REF! 4
Aprovadas
Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 80% 99% 99% .

% de Produtos OK
Produtos OK
(Sem Retrabalho)
Realizao #REF! 100%
M Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 90% 100% 100% .
A
T % do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 90% 100% 100%
% de Produtos OK
E
R
Proporo OK (Incluindo Realizao #REF! 100%
Retrabalho)
I % do objetivo planejado 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
A
L % do objetivo final 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 0 0 0 0
Numero de % do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Aprovao de Subcomponentes
Subcomponentes totalmente
Realizao #REF! 0
P aprovados % do objetivo planejado 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
N
Como indicao do planejamento para atendimento dos requisitos do
T Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 2 2 2 APSECTO de APARENCIA das peas ser utilizado.(1 - No atendimento da
O aparencia de superficie no ponto chave do projeto e 2 - atendimento da
% do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% aparencia de superficie no ponto chave do projeto)
S
Aparencia das
Superficie das peas
peas produzidas
Realizao #REF! 2
C .
A % do objetivo final 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
V Como indicao do planejamento para atendimento dos requisitos para
E Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 0 0 0 GRAVAO DAS PEAS ser utilizado. (0 - Pea isenta de gravao, 1 - No
atendimento da gravao na pea no ponto chave do projeto e 2 -
S % do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% atendimento da gravao na pea no ponto chave do projeto)
Peas produzidas
Gravao nas peas
com gravao
Realizao #REF! 2
.

Numero de
Produo completa
de ferramentas
Ferramentas Realizao #REF! 1
completas

Numero de
Produo completa
M de dispositivos
dispositivos Realizao #REF! 1
A completos
Q
U % do objetivo final 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
I Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 1 1 1 .
N
A Numero de % do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 100% 100% 100%
S Instalaes instalaes
Autorizadas autorizadas ou
Realizao #REF! 1
concluidas % do objetivo planejado 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%

Tempo de ciclo
Realizao do
tempo de ciclo
realizado (em Realizao #REF! 5
segundos)

Quantidade de
Avaliao de
Embalagem
Embalagem Realizao #REF! 4
M Avaliada
E
T % do objetivo final 0% 0% #REF! 400% 0%
O Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 0 3 3 .
D
O % do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Numero de
Instrues de
Trabalho
Instrues de Realizao #REF! 3
Trabalho Concludas
Pontuao Mdia 0% 0% #REF! 113% 0%
PONTO CHAVE DO PROJETO: VALIDAO PROCESSO (FASE 4) DATA DA REVISO:

,
ENGENHARIA QUALIDADE VENDAS PRODUO PCP GERENCIA PLANTA
Nome 0 0 0 0 0 0
Assinatura
FQ 7.1-52 Rev. 01
CHECK LIST DA ANLISE CRTICA DO APQP
FASE 4: Validao do produto e do processo
Cliente: 0
4.1 - CORRIDA PILOTO DE PRODUO SIM NO N/A
4.1.1 - Foi realizado o evento de Lote Piloto conforme acordado com o cliente?
4.1.2 - Na realizao do piloto foi utilizado os mesmos parmetros (Maquina/Equipamentos/Material) que sero
utilizados na produo do item e esto definidos no Fluxo do Processo?
4.1.3 - Foi realizada a auditoria de Pr Produo?
4.1.4 - O cliente possui formulario especifico para realizar a auditoria de Pr Produo?
4.2 - AVALIAO DO SISTEMA DE MEDIO (MSA) SIM NO N/A
4.2.1 - Foi realizado a avaliao do sistema de medio?
4.2.2 - Foi efetivado com operadores treinados?
4.2.3 - Os instrumentos esto adequados e disponveis?
4.3 - ESTUDO DE CAPABILIDADE DO PROCESSO (Ppk) SIM NO N/A
4.3.1 - O cliente requer Estudo de Capabilidade do Processo para o PPAP?
4.3.2 - Foi elaborado Estudo de Capabilidade do Processo?
4.4 - APROVAO DE PEA DE PRODUO SIM NO N/A
4.4.1 - Aps confeco do lote piloto ser necessrio atualizao do Fluxo do Processo?
4.4.2 - Aps confeco do lote piloto ser necessrio atualizao do FMEA do processo?
4.4.3 - Aps confeco do lote piloto ser necessrio atualizao dos Planos de Controle?
4.4.4 - Foi realizado dimensional completo do item?
4.4.5 - Foram analisados os resultados dos certificados de materiais e de acabamento?
4.4.6 - Foi confeccionado Book de PPAP + PSW e submetido ao cliente?
4.4.7 - O PPAP + PSW submetido ao cliente foi aprovado?
4.5 - TESTE DE VALIDAO DE PRODUO SIM NO N/A
4.5.1 - As peas manufaturadas no lote piloto atingiram o padro estabelecido pelo cliente?
4.6 - AVALIAO DE EMBALAGEM SIM NO N/A
4.6.1 - Foi validado que o tipo de embalagem atende as especificaes de proteo do item?
4.6.2 - Foi validado a quantidade de peas por embalagem esto adequadas?
4.6.3 - Cliente solicita o envio do padro de embalagem para aprovao?
4.6.4 - Cliente possui formulrio especifico para aprovao de embalagem?
4.6.5 - Padro de embalagem est aprovado pelo cliente?
4.7 - PLANO DE CONTROLE DE PRODUO SIM NO N/A
4.7.1 - Os planos de controle foi revisado de Pr Lanamento para Produo?
4.7.2 - Os planos foram distribudos e esto disponveis para a produo?
4.8 -TREINAMENTO DOS OPERADORES SIM NO N/A
4.8.1 - O treinamento da operao foi realizado conforme o FQ-7.1 - 49?
4.9 - PREPARAO E MONITORAMENTO DA PRODUO SIM NO N/A
4.9.1 - No Plano de Preparao e Monitoramento para a Produo foram atualizadas as informaes pertinentes
a esta fase?
4.9.2 - As metas estabelacidas no Plano de Preparao e Monitoramento para a Produo para esta fase do
projeto esto sendo atendidas?
ANLISE CRTICA - FASE 4
1 - PENDENCIAS/AES:
2 - COMENTRIOS:
3 - PARTICIPANTES:
1 - Existe alguma pendencia que impossibilite o fechamento da Fase 4? Sim No Data:
2 - Pode-se iniciar ou prosseguir o andamento da Fase 5? Sim No
FASE 4: Validao do produto e do processo
Cliente: 0
ENGENHARIA QUALIDADE COMPRAS PCP / PRODUO GERENCIA PLANTA
FQ-7.1-47 REV. 02
PLANO DE PREPARAO E MONITORAMENTO PARA A PRODUO
Cliente: 0
Fatores que influenciam a Preparao da Produo (Todos os nmeros abaixo so nmeros Pontos Chaves do Projeto
Comentrios
acumulativos) TRY-OUT C. PILOTO SOP
Numero de Pessoas
Time Requerido Necessarias para Realizao #REF! 2
Realizar o Processo
M
E
M % do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Numero de Pessoas
Nvel de Habilidade Totalmente Realizao #REF! 2
Treinadas

Realizao de Numero de Testes
Testes Aprovados
Realizao #REF! 1

Nmeros de
Capacidade do
Processo
Caractersticas Realizao #REF! 4
Aprovadas
Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 80% 99% 99% .

% de Produtos OK
Produtos OK
(Sem Retrabalho)
Realizao #REF! 100%
M Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 90% 100% 100% .
A
T % do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 90% 100% 100%
% de Produtos OK
E
R
Proporo OK (Incluindo Realizao #REF! 100%
Retrabalho)
I % do objetivo planejado 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
A
L % do objetivo final 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 0 0 0 0
Numero de % do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

Aprovao de Subcomponentes
Subcomponentes totalmente
Realizao #REF! 0
P aprovados % do objetivo planejado 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
N
Como indicao do planejamento para atendimento dos requisitos do
T Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 2 2 2 APSECTO de APARENCIA das peas ser utilizado.(1 - No atendimento da
O aparencia de superficie no ponto chave do projeto e 2 - atendimento da
% do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% aparencia de superficie no ponto chave do projeto)
S
Aparencia das
Superficie das peas
peas produzidas
Realizao #REF! 2
C .
A % do objetivo final 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
V Como indicao do planejamento para atendimento dos requisitos para
E Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 0 0 0 GRAVAO DAS PEAS ser utilizado. (0 - Pea isenta de gravao, 1 - No
atendimento da gravao na pea no ponto chave do projeto e 2 -
S % do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% atendimento da gravao na pea no ponto chave do projeto)
Peas produzidas
Gravao nas peas
com gravao
Realizao #REF! 2
.

Numero de
Produo completa
de ferramentas
Ferramentas Realizao #REF! 1
completas

Numero de
Produo completa
M de dispositivos
dispositivos Realizao #REF! 1
A completos
Q
U % do objetivo final 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%
I Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 1 1 1 .
N
A Numero de % do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 100% 100% 100%
S Instalaes instalaes
Autorizadas autorizadas ou
Realizao #REF! 1
concluidas % do objetivo planejado 0% 0% #REF! 100% 0%

Tempo de ciclo
Realizao do
tempo de ciclo
realizado (em Realizao #REF! 5
segundos)

Quantidade de
Avaliao de
Embalagem
Embalagem Realizao #REF! 4
M Avaliada
E
T % do objetivo final 0% 0% #REF! 400% 0%
O Objetivo planejado para cada ponto chave 0 3 3 .
D
O % do objetivo planejado em relao ao objetivo final 0% 0% 0% 100% 100%
Numero de
Instrues de
Trabalho
Instrues de Realizao #REF! 3
Trabalho Concludas
Pontuao Mdia 0% 0% #REF! 113% 0%
PONTO CHAVE DO PROJETO: RETROALIMENTAO DO PROCESSO (FASE 5) DATA DA REVISO:

,
ENGENHARIA QUALIDADE VENDAS PRODUO PCP GERENCIA PLANTA
Nome 0 0 0 0 0 0
Assinatura
FQ 7.1-52 Rev. 01
FASE 5: Retroalimentao, Avaliao e Ao Corretiva
Cliente: 0
5.1 - VARIAO REDUZIDA SIM NO N/A
5.1.1 - Houve alguma quebra de qualidade identificada durante a inspeo 100%?
5.1.2 - Houve alguma ao corretiva implementada ao processo devido a quebra de qualidade
identificada durante a inspeo 100%?
5.2 - SATISFAO DO CLIENTE SIM NO N/A
5.2.1 - Houve alguma quebra de qualidade na manufatura do cliente?
5.2.2 - Houve alguma ao corretiva implementada ao processo devido a quebra de qualidade
relatada pelo cliente?
5.2.3 - Houve alguma ponto que necessitasse de adequao devido a sugesto do cliente?
5.3 - ENTREGA E ASSISTNCIA TCNICA SIM NO N/A
5.3.1 - Houve algum problema logstico durante o inicio das entregas?
5.3.2 - Quantidade de embalagens esto conforme fluxo logstico do cliente?
5.3.3 - Houve necessidade de utilizao de embalagens alternativas?
5.3.4 - Houve necessidade de utilizao de frete extra para entrega do item?
5.4 - LIES APRENDIDAS / MELHORES PRTICAS SIM NO N/A
5.4.1 - Foram analisadas as lies apreendidas durante o processo de desenvolvimento do item?
5.4.2 - Foi necessrio a incluso de alguma lio apreendida na planilha Master?
5.5 - PREPARAO E MONITORAMENTO DA PRODUO SIM NO N/A
5.5.1 - No Plano de Preparao e Monitoramento para a Produo foram atualizadas as informaes pertinentes
a esta fase?
5.5.2 - As metas estabelacidas no Plano de Preparao e Monitoramento para a Produo para esta fase do
projeto esto sendo atendidas?
ANLISE CRTICA - FASE 5
1 - PENDENCIAS/AES:
2 - COMENTRIOS:
3 - PARTICIPANTES:
1 - Existe alguma pendencia que impossibilite o fechamento da Fase ? Sim No Data:
2 - Produto pode ser liberado para vida serie? Sim No
ENGENHARIA QUALIDADE COMPRAS PCP / PRODUO GERENCIA PLANTA
FASE 5: Retroalimentao, Avaliao e Ao Corretiva
Cliente: 0
FQ-7.1-48 REV. 00

Apqp Inglês

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Apqp Inglês

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

REGISTRATION DATA FOR DEVELOPMENT

Customer: Name: Wheight of part (Kg):

Part Number: Internal Code: Date Registration

Date of draw: Date of draw review: Start Date:

Feedstock: Feedstock Code:

Feedstock: Feedstock Code:

Component: Component Code:

Component: Thermal Treatment

surface finish: Surface Finish Code:

Flow Chart Process Operations

Index Comennts Value Means of Mensurement

Check Frequency: Reaction Plan

Scketching: how to process sheet

C6: NOME DO CLIENTE

C8: NMERO DA PEA

C10: DATA DO DESENHO

C12: DESCRIO MATRIA PRIMA

C14: DESCRIO MATRIA PRIMA

C16: DESCRIO MATRIA PRIMA

C18: DESCRIO MATRIA PRIMA

C20: Descrio do acabamento superficial.

C53: FREQUENCIA DAS MEDIES NO PROCESSO:

D54: INDICAR O PROCEDIMENTO

E10: Date of Last Modification and level of draw:

E24: DESCRIO DAS OPERAES:

F6: NOME DA PEA

F8: CODIGO POLISTAMPO

F10: DATA DE REVISO DO DESENHO

F67: INSERIR CROQUI

H49: DESCREVER O INSTRUMENTO A

J6: PESO DA PEA

J8: DATA REVISO DO OCUMENTO

J10: DATA DE INICIO DESENVOLVIMENTO

J12: Cd. Interno do compnente

J14: Cd. Interno do compnente

J16: Cd. Interno do compnente

J18: Cd. Interno do compnente

Product Name: Date of draw review:: Customer:

LEGEND X FORESEEN ON GOING STARTED BEHIND SCHEDULE REPLANED

1.1 INPUS OF CUSTOMER:

1.1.1 MACKET RESEARCH

1.1.2 HISTORY OF QUALITY ASSURANCE

1.1.3 EXPERIENCE TEAM OF DEVELOPMENT

1.2 BUSINES PLAN / ESTRATGY OF MARKETING

1.3 DATE BENCHMARK OF PRODUCT AND PROCESS

1.4 PREMISSAS OF PRODUCT AND PROCESS

1.5 STUDIES OF THE PRODUCT REBIALITY

1.6 INPUTS OF CUSTOMER (RQ) (RP) (RC)

1.7 PROJETCTS OBJECTIVES

1.8 GOALS OF RELIABILITY AND QUALITY (RQ)

1.9 FEEDSTOCK PRELIMINARY LIST

1.10 FLOW CHART PRELIMINARY PROCESS

1.11 PRELIMINARY LIST OF FEATURES EPECIAL PRODUCT AND PROCESS (RC)

1.12 PRODUCT WARRANT PLAN

Product Name: Date of draw review:: Customer:

LEGEND X FORESEEN ON GOING STARTED BEHIND SCHEDULE REPLANED

1.13 CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF APQP PHASE OF CLOSING

STAGE 2 - PROJECT AND DEVELOPMENT PRODUCT

2.1 ANALYSIS OF METHOD AND DESIGN OF FAILURE OF PROJECT

2.2 PROJECT TO MANUFACTURABILITY AND ASSEMBLER

2.3 PROJECT CHECK

2.4 PROJECT CRITICAL ANALISYS

2.5 PROTOTYPE MANUFACTURING

2.6 ENGENEERINGS DRAW (INCLUDE MODEL 3D) (RP)