Professional Documents
Culture Documents
for the
FOURTH CIRCUIT
*
*
* * * * * * * * *
1
Please see: Docket entry number 6.
Appeal: 17-1955 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/20/2017 Pg: 2 of 5
2. Petitioner has now waited more than a full month to obtain permission from this
distinguished federal judges, now retired Judge Richard A. Posner from the U.S.
3. Mr. Posner is a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of New York
4. This court has offered no explanation whatsoever over an almost 5-week period
5. This courts failure to facilitate or permit (with any necessary conditions set
for no apparent reason the underlying denials of due process that are the gravamen
6. Surely it is not the complexity of the motion for advisory counsel representation
2
Appeal: 17-1955 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/20/2017 Pg: 3 of 5
8. If there are reasons for denying the advisory counsel relief that the court
concludes cannot be resolved by attaching conditions, then petitioner asks that the
court order that Mr. Posner may be admitted to the Bar of the Fourth Circuit for the
9. To be very clear petitioner and Mr. Posner still agree that petitioner should be
allowed to remain pro se with Mr. Posners advisory counsel assistance. In short,
petitioner believes he has the due process right to win this case on his own efforts,
10. But, if the court will not allow their review of petitioners case to proceed with
advisory counsel, the court must allow Mr. Posner to now enter this case as
2
Please see: Exhibit no.:1, the Second Affidavit of Richard A. Posner.
3
Should the court take this course, it is only right and just that the court
order Mr. Posners future costs in this case to be offset and subsidized per Local
Rule 46(d), if not other Local Rules.
3
Appeal: 17-1955 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/20/2017 Pg: 4 of 5
11. Should the court fail to promptly act on this supplemented motion it is
12. In acting on the motion, the court should either expressly order or authorize the
13. Petitioner asks that the court act expeditiously on this supplemented motion in
14. Finally, petitioner asks that other than an order requiring that respondents
answer the petition for writ of mandamus, the court take no action in this
WHEREFORE, for the aforementioned reasons, petitioner prays that the court
4
Petitioner contacted opposing counsel under Local Rule 27(a) about the
4
Appeal: 17-1955 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/20/2017 Pg: 5 of 5
Respectfully submitted,
/s/
_________________________
WILLIAM C. BOND
Pro Se
P.O. Box 4823
Baltimore, Maryland 21211
(443) 970-2887
proselitigator@aol.com
/s/
_________________________
WILLIAM C. BOND
motions comprising this filing and was informed that the government does not
consent and will determine how to respond once the motions have been filed.
5