Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The aim of this diploma paper is to discuss certain aspects of the language of book
reviews, which is seen by the author of this research as a type of specialized language. Since
this analysis concerns a particular language area a specialized, corpus has been compiled by
the researcher. The corpus is referred to as the Do-It-Yourself Book Review Corpus
(henceforth, the DIY BRC). The table below presents the structure of the DIY BRC.
Table 3.1 The structure of the DIY Book Review Corpus (DIY BRC)
Source Number of Number of Mean sample Proportion of
tokens samples size the corpus (%)
The Guardian 69 815 102 684 61
The Daily Telegraph 36 284 55 660 31
The New York Times 8839 9 982 8
Total 114 938 166 692 100
The DIY BRC totals 114 938 words (tokens) and consists of 166 written samples.
Each language sample constitutes a complete document (book review). The language
instances come from three different sources, so as to make the corpus possibly representative
and balanced. They have been downloaded from the websites of such British and American
quality newspapers as The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph and The New York Times. It should
be stressed that all language samples are in the form of electronic files and they have been
written by native speakers of British and American English.
The compiling of the corpus took place from 22 nd January to 26th May 2013. The
processing of the linguistic data has been facilitated by a professional lexical analysis
software package referred to as the WordSmith Tools 6.0, which has been specially purchased
for this project by the researcher. The corpus is not either lemmatized or tagged automatically.
There are cases of lemmatization in the further sections of the present chapter, however it has
been done manually by the researcher herself whenever necessary. More details concerning
the structure of the DIY BRC can be found in Table 3.1.
Table 3.2
Word or Frequency Word or Frequency Word or phrase Frequency
phrase phrase
It is worthy of mention that the list illustrated by Table 3.2 has been lemmatized
manually by the researcher. This means that, for instance, the two word-forms book and books
are seen basically as the same word, that is, as the word-forms which belong to one lemma
book. Conclusions drawn from the analysis of the frequency list of book review terms will be
discussed in the following section.
The noun reader is mainly used here to signify a person who reads, especially one
who reads a lot or in a particular way (Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary). There are
two instances constituting an exception, in which it means a special device called electricity
meter reader. Reader occurs more frequently in the singular than in the plural. This lexical
item is one of the most popular specialized terms (ranked 7th in Table 3.2) and can be
regarded as the most important one in the DIY BRC as far as the nouns referring to persons
mentioned in book reviews are concerned. Still books and book reviews are written for the
reader, not for writers or critics. The linguistic data gathered in the DIY BRC and
concordance lines presented below show how the lemma reader has been used by book
review writers.
afterwards, and this well-judged finish leaves the reader space to reconsider the mass of Charlie's
Hamid is too deft a craftsman simply to bully the reader Instead he seeks to create a more collusive
yet McDonalds story differs by grounding the reader in reality at the start by using a normal
he eviscerates countless books to furnish the reader with stimulating scientific hypotheses
by imprecision. It works to prevent the reader from engaging with the story. This
ever will be, she begins, addressing the reader of her diary. Together were making magic
unknown
and here's the opportunity for the privileged reader literacy in these circumstances is a privilege
swooning sex amid the lilacs, in which delighted readers sniffed the stench of corruption and
taking liberties / Isn't it, this business?" Readers of Woodward's novels, such as the wonderful
The lemma reader tends to be modified by some adjectives such as devoted, mildest,
ordinary, privileged, unknown, young, delighted or regular. It is also preceded by words
referring to readers nationality, name of a newspaper, name of an author, or other words like
many, every, his, etc. However, it should be emphasized, that review authors in majority of
cases (45 out of 111 instances) refer to this lexical item simply as the reader with no
additional words in between.
It has been observed that reader co-occurs with various verbs, such as persuade,
place, draw, invite, bully, ground, furnish, tell, prevent, play, urge, etc. It can be found in
different phrases (e.g. furnish the reader with [...]hypotheses, ground the reader in reality,
prevent the reader with engaging with the story, leave the reader space to reconsider, the
readers will rarely be bored, the reader is addressed throughout in the first person, give the
reader access to, keep the reader guessing until the very end, etc.). This lexical item also
tends to occur in such patterns as: the reader of [book title], the reader of [author`s name + the
word novel or book].
Concluding, it has been stated that the lemma reader is one of the most important and
central words in the DIY BRC, which is used mainly in one sense. It can be found in many
different expressions, especially with verbs, where it usually functions as the object rather
than the subject. Besides, it is more likely to encounter this lexical item as directly preceded
by the article the than by an adjective or any other modifier.
As has been pointed out in section 3.2. the noun book deserves the status of the central
and most important lexical item in the whole corpus. Hence, a more in-depth, concordance
analysis should be applied.
Book is used in the DIY BRC to signify a written work published in printed or
electronic form (Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary). It occurs definitely more often in
the singular (F 316) than in the plural (F 81). The fragment of concordance lines presented
below show how the book review writers have used the lemma book.
Table: Concordance lines for book
since Richard Buckles ground-breaking 1971 book and while new information has from time to
In this highly entertaining and absorbing book Henry Hitchings guides us through the story
this is a slight, anecdotal and badly edited book that rehashes stories from previous memoirs
ago, I strongly recommended this author's first book The Age of Wire and String, not despite but
spite this sombre foresight, the mood of Holmes's book is mostly joyous, and light-headed enough to
Geoff Dyer, in Zona (2012) his great looping book about another great looper, Andrei Tarkovsky
it a go. It would be easy to produce this kind of book and Plump doesnt take the easy way through
when Hitler had just become chancellor, this book reveals how Nazi Germany was seen through for
about the government, the authors write. This book articulates why any leaders, whether legitimate
like one anothers. This ought to make self-help books antithetical to ambitious works of fiction
The above concordances as well as the corpus material suggest that the lemma book
tends to be found in an extremely wide range of phrases and patterns, the most frequent of
which are as follows: his/her book, new book, first book, [authors name] + book, book
about, self-help book, or book by [authors name].
It has been observed that book is preceded by a variety of adjectives, such as
fascinating, successful, sympathetic, elegant, plain-looking, good-natured, interesting,
infuriating, impassioned, gripping, sprawling, epic, ground-breaking, recent, etc. (e.g.
fascinating and vividly written book, elegant and resonant book). There are only few instances
of adjectives being used after the noun book (e.g. invaluable, excellent, full, antithetical, or
funny).
The noun book tends to be accompanied by many different verbs. Write is the
commonest word of this type which precedes book. Other verbs, less popular, used after the
noun book are as follows: make, propose, read, edit, refer, finish, recommend, produce,
dismiss, adore, like, etc. (e.g. strongly recommend this book, refer to another book, etc.).
There are a lot of verbs which are used after book, for example reveal, articulate, examine,
remind, show, move, follow, provide, etc.
This lemma can be found in many more different phrases, especially those including
the preposition of, such as: the mood of book is joyous, this kind/sort of book, originality of
the book, book of oddities, etc.
To conclude, the noun book is the most frequent specialized term in the corpus. It
occurs in a wide range of contexts. This lexical item is characterized by a great number of
words with which it co-occurs. However, apart from the patterns enumerated in the third and
fifth paragraph of this subsection, most of the phrases have been encountered once or twice in
the DIY BRC.
The novel, being the second commonest specialized term, is used here to mean a
story long enough to fill a complete book, in which the characters and events are usually
imaginary (Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary). This lexical item occurs mainly in the
singular (F 203, compared to F 40 for the plural). Concordances below show some examples
of the use of novel.
The commonest patterns, apart from clusters like the novel, this novel, or a novel, in
which this noun can be found are debut novel, [year] + novel, first novel, new novel,
[authors name] + novel, his/her novel, novel about, or novel set in. Less frequent patterns
will be discussed in the further paragraphs.
As regards adjectives, the most typical ones used before the noun novel are
entertaining, ambitious, fine, latest, great, time-bending, memorable, bestselling, distinctive,
audacious, previous, touching, overpraised, or earlier. Only few instances of adjectives (e.g.
conventional or worst) occurring after the lemma analyzed have been encountered in the
whole corpus.
The noun novel tends to be preceded by such verbs as produce, write, admire, start,
publish, open, or construct (e.g. produce a novel, open the novel with a note, etc.). It turns out
that far more verbs are used after novel, for instance, tell, describe, live, sound, displays,
explore, excel, end, start (e.g. the novel displays the mastery, the novel ends abruptly, etc.).
There are also here instances of verbs, such as write, narrate, or set, being used in the passive
voice like in the expressions the novel is set in, the novel is narrated by, etc.
Other expressions in which novel can be found are among others those including the
preposition of, for example, a series/collection/sequence of novels, much of the novel, novel of
middle life, and the like.
All things considered, it has been shown in this subsection that the lemma novel, as
one of the most frequent lexical items in the corpus, occurs in a variety of contexts. However,
it must be stressed that despite so many occurrences of this noun, only around 10 patterns are
frequent enough to stand out as being far more common and typical than others. This means
that the selection of modifying words for example is so huge that predicting what vocabulary
a particular review writer will use may be extremely difficult.
Plot, which is defined as the series of events that form the story of a novel, play,
film (Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary) has a surprisingly low number of occurrences
in my corpus (F 21 for the singular and F 1 for the plural). Consequently, concordance
analysis conducted here will not show too many instances of the use of this noun.
As the above concordances and the corpus material show, the lemma plot can be
modified by such adjectives as melodramatic, pacy, clunky, sensational or predictable. It is
also followed by such verbs as involve, emerge, take or hurtle.
Plot can be found in the corpus in some phrases like a story without a plot, plot is set
in, to become tangled in a melodramatic plot, plot of war, plot convolutions, plot elements,
plot strands, plot twists, or plot-driven fiction.
Concluding, since the noun plot has been rarely used by the authors of the reviews
collected in the DIY BRC, the above analysis gives merely a partial answer to the question of
how this noun is used in real language instances. On the other hand, this fact may suggest that
there are alternative, perhaps better, ways of referring to plot without using this word.
The noun character, unlike other lexical items analyzed by means of concordances in
this chapter, occurs more frequently in the plural (F 51) than in the singular (F 43). Moreover,
it turns out that this noun in the singular is used in the DIY BRC to signify not only a person,
or an animal in a book, play or film/movie (Oxford Advanced Learner Dictionary), but also
all the qualities and features that make a person, groups of people, and places different from
others (Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary). The latter sense refers to nearly 40 per cent
of cases. Since this research focuses on book review vocabulary, the instances used in the
second sense will not be taken into account. Linguistic data gathered in the corpus, as well as
concordances presented below, show how the lemma character has been used.
The commonest patterns in which the noun character has been used in the corpus are
as follows: [authors name] + character, his/her characters, or character + [characters
name]. Less frequent phrases are specified in the further paragraphs of this subsection.
Character is preceded by a variety of adjectives, such as central, entertaining, strong,
interesting, knowable, main, same, secondary, ugliest, anarchic, bombastic, extreme, greatest,
minor, powerful, quirky, etc. There are only few cases of adjectives being used after this
lemma, for example, diverse, compelling, sympathetic, vivid, or likeable.
As has been observed, character has been used in a wide range of phrases including
the preposition of, for example, small/broad cast of characters, portraits of characters,
transformations of characters, lives of characters, strength of characters, etc. Other phrases
in which this lemma has been encountered include: fully drawn character, title character,
connection between reader and character, characters chiseled with, characters separated by
time and space, etc.
Concluding, the noun character differs from other lexical items analyzed in this
chapter, because its plural forms, are more frequent than singular ones. In addition, the
singular forms have two completely different meanings. Moreover, the lemma can be
characterized by the three patterns which are far more frequent than others.
The noun story, being the third commonest specialized term in the DIY BRC, is
mainly used here to signify a description of events and people that the writer or speaker has
invented in order to entertain people (Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary). The lemma
story is more common in the singular (F 159) than in the plural (F 65). The corpus material as
well as the concordance lines below show some instances of the use of this noun.
One of the most important findings concerning the lemma story is the fact that nine
patterns in which this lemma occurs are far more frequent than the other patterns and phrases.
So, the commonest patterns where story is used are the following: His/her story, love story,
short story, life story, tell a/the story, collection of stories, story of, story about, and
[storytellers name] + story. Less common phrases are discussed below.
The noun story can be characterized by a great number of adjectives which co-occur
with it. Story is modified by such adjectives as human, moving, touching, different,
compelling, gripping, great, full, fascinating, wonderful, universal, personal, predictable,
national, heartbreaking, poignant, or individual. The number of adjectives following the
lemma story in the corpus material is rather low. By this is meant that only such words have
been encountered as lively, funny, interesting.
It has been observed that story can be preceded by verbs like whisper, identify, follow,
understand, relate, end, address, come up with, develop, dramatize, unfold, act out, produce,
or revisit. As far as the verbs which may be used after the lemma story are concerned, they
are as follows: end, unfold, rely on, suggest, involve, appear, assemble, tell, write, or set. It
should be mentioned here that the last four verbs have occurred in the passive voice.
To conclude, story as one of the most frequent specialized terms in the corpus, occurs
in a wide range of contexts. What distinguishes this noun from other lexical items analyzed in
this chapter is a higher number of verbs with which it co-occurs.
This subsection is aimed at discussing the use of two synonymous lemmas: writer and
author. As has been observed, the two nouns are mainly used in my corpus to signify a
person whose job is writing books, stories, articles, etc. (Oxford Advanced Learners
Dictionary). The lemma writer has more occurrences than the other one. These nouns occur
more frequently in the singular than in the plural writer (singular: F 62, plural: F 46),
whereas author (singular: F 46, plural: 23). On the basis of the linguistic data gathered in the
DIY BRC one may observe some contextual similarities and differences between these lexical
items.
First of all, both lemmas are accompanied by various adjectives. Writer tends to be
preceded by young, aspiring, comic, compelling, contemporary, creative, gifted, lesser,
successful, influential, talented, great, leftish, roguish, prominent, hapless, fellow, etc.(e.g.
aspiring writer, gifted writer), whereas the noun author is used after such adjectives as
decent, young, best, dead, essential, favourite, foreign, postmodernist, etc.) As the above
examples suggest, the number of adjectives with which writer co-occurs is considerably
greater. Interestingly enough, the noun author is more often preceded by adjectives in the
plural than in the singular. It is commonplace in my corpus that the article the comes directly
before author (31 times, compared to merely 12 instances for the noun writer), there is not
any modifier in between. In addition, the lemma writer occurs a lot more frequently (F 10)
than the other one (F 1) in the pattern with adjectives referring to nationality, for example:
American writer or American author. As far as adjectives used after the two lemmas are
concerned, it has been noticed that writer is followed by a greater number of such words (e.g.
exact, lyrical, playful, sulky, aloof, etc.) than author (e.g. great, insightful).
It is characteristic of both lexical items to be accompanied by a wide variety of verbs
in different expressions. For instance, writer tends to be followed by break, see, recall, point
out, call, feel, etc. Author is used before even more verbs or verbal phrases like illuminate,
obsess about sth, show, become tangled, succeed in portraying sth, argue, unfold, sound
assured, etc.
The lemmas analyzed also occur in patterns including the preposition of. Writer may
be preceded by such phrases as a generation of, in the hands of, in the presence of, the sense
of, kind of, etc.(e.g. in the hands of the writer), and followed by: of the century, of that caliber,
of his generation (e.g. writers of that caliber). The lemma author, in turn, tends to be used
after phrases: intellectual development of, the name of its, etc. (e.g. the name of its author). It
has been observed that the pattern of + [book title] is exclusively used with the lemma author,
for instance author of The Best Exotic Marigold Hotel.
Concluding, writer and author are synonyms which can be found in many different
contexts. The lemma writer, as a more frequent word, occurs in a wider range of patterns.
Besides, as the analysis of the linguistic data in my corpus has shown, there are more
contextual differences than similarities between these two lemmas.