Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NATo-PCO-DATA BASE
The electronic index to the NATO ASI Series provides full bibliographical references
(with keywords and/or abstracts) to more than 30000 contributions from international
scientists published in all sections of the NATO ASI Series.
Access to the NATO-peO-DATA BASE is possible in two ways:
- via online FILE 128 (NATO-PCO-DATA BASE) hosted by ESRIN,
Via Galileo Galilei, 1-00044 Frascati, Italy.
- via CD-ROM "NATO-PCO-DATA BASE" with user-friendly retrieval software in
English, French and German ( WTV GmbH and DATAWARE Technologies Inc.
1989).
The CD-ROM can be ordered through any member of the Board of Publishers or
through NATO-PCO, Overijse, Belgium.
"
Iit.AI
ISBN 978-94-010-5414-0
CHAPTER 2
PHYSICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND ASSESSMENT OF ROCK
DURABILITY THROUGH INDEX PROPERTIES
J. DELGADO RODRIGUES
1. INTRODUCTION 7
2. BRIEF PRESENTATION OF MOST COMMON ROCK TYPES 8
2.1. significance of geological classifications 8
2.2. Rock materials in general classifications 9
CHAPTER 3
ROCKFILL MODELLING
A. K. PARKIN
1. INTRODUCTION 35
2. ROCKFILL IN PLACE 36
3. TRIAXIAL TESTING EQUIPMENT 36
4. MAXIMUM PARTICLE SIZE, TEST SAMPLES 36
5. MODEL GRADINGS 39
7. A CASE HISTORY 46
8. CONCLUSIONS 48
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 49
REFERENCES 49
CHAPTER 4
LABORATORY SHEAR STRENGTH TESTS AND THE STABILITY OF
ROCKFILL SLOPES
J. A. CHARLES
1. INTRODUCTION 53
2. LABORATORY TESTS 54
3. STRAIN CONDITIONS 54
4. INITIAL POROSITY 55
5. CONFINING PRESSURE 55
vii
6. DILATANCY 60
7. PARTICLE SIZE 60
8. SLOPE STABILITY 62
9. STABILITY CHARTS FOR ROCKFILL SLOPES 63
10. STABILITY OF SUBMERGED ROCKFILL SLOPES 64
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 70
REFERENCES 70
CHAPTER 5
LABORATORY COMPRESSION TESTS AND THE DEFORMATION OF
ROCKFILL STRUCTURES
J. A. CHARLES
1. INTRODUCTION 73
1.1. Changes in applied stress 73
1.2. Increase in moisture content 74
1.3. Vibrations associated with dynamic
loading 74
viii
3. FIELD PROPERTIES 80
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 92
APPENDIX A
CONSTANT EQUIVALENT CONSTRAINED MODULUS 93
APPENDIX B
STRESS PATHS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND RESER-
VOIR IMPOUNDING FOR UPSTREAM MEMBRANE DAMS 93
REFERENCES 94
CHAPTER 6
COLLAPSE: ITS IMPORTANCE, FUNDAMENTALS AND
MODELLING
J. L. JUSTO
1. INTRODUCTION 97
REFERENCES 141
APPENDIX 1: PARAMETERS OF CONGLOMERATE IN
YEGUAS DAM, ASSUMING OEDOMETRIC
CONDITIONS (FIG.25 AND 26) 143
APPENDIX 2: PARAMETERS OF ROCKFILL IN MARTIN
GONZALO DAM, ASSUMING OEDOMETRIC
CONDITIONS 146
CHAPTER 7
TEST FILLS AND IN SITU TESTS
J. L. JUSTO
CHAPTER 8
LABORATORY TESTING AND QUALITY CONTROL OF ROCKFILL
- GERMAN PRACTICE
J. BRAUNS AND K. KAST
1. INTRODUCTION 195
2. GENERAL ASPECTS 195
3. ASPECTS OF LABORATORY TESTING 204
3.1. Rock quality and gradation 204
3.2. "True" rockfill samples 204
3.3. Sample dimensions 207
3.4. Layout of devices for oedometer tests 207
3.5. Layout of devices for triaxial tests 209
3.6. Direct shear tests 212
4. ASPECTS OF QUALITY CONTROL 213
5. CONCLUDING REMARKS 218
REFERENCES 219
CHAPTER 9
CREEP OF ROCKFILL
A. K. PARKIN
1. INTRODUCTION 221
7. CONCLUSIONS 234
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 236
REFERENCES 236
xi
CHAPTER 10
FILTERS AND DRAINS
J. BRAUNS
1. INTRODUCTION 239
2. PRESENT PRACTICE OF FILTER DESIGN 241
2.1. Geometrical criteria 241
2.2. Scattering of gradations 242
2.3. Finest fraction in filter materials 246
2.4. Filters for cohesive soils 247
2.5. Hydraulic criteria 248
3. RECENT INVESTIGATIONS ON THE PROBLEM OF
FILTER STABILITY 252
4. DRAINS 261
5. CONCLUDING REMARKS 265
REFERENCES 266
CHAPTER 11
STRESS - STRAIN LAWS AND PARAMETER VALUES
D. J. NAYLOR
1. INTRODUCTION 269
CHAPTER 12
FINITE ELEMENT METHODS FOR FILLS AND EMBANKMENT
DAMS
D. J. NAYLOR
1. INTRODUCTION 291
2. NUMBER OF LAYERS - ACTUAL AND ANALYTICAL 292
3. DEFORMATION IN A RISING FILL 292
4. BASIC FINITE ELEMENT PROCEDURE 292
5. INTERPRETATION OF FINITE ELEMENT DIS-
PLACEMENTS - 1D CASE 294
6. NEW LAYER STIFFNESS REDUCTION 296
7. MODELLING COMPACTION 300
8. FINITE ELEMENT EFFECTIVE STRESS TECHNIQUES 302
8.1. Undrained effective stress analysis 302
8.2. Known pore pressure change analysis 305
9. FIRST FILLING AND OPERATION - GENERAL 306
CHAPTER 13
CONCRETE FACE ROCKFILL DAMS
NELSON L. DE S. PINTO
1. INTRODUCTION 341
2. CURRENT DESIGN PRACTICE 343
2.1. Evolution 343
2.2. Embankment 344
2.2.1. General comments 344
2.2.2. Zone 1. Impervious blanket 345
2.2.3. Zone 2. Processed small rock
transition 345
2.2.4. Zone 3. Main rockfill embankment 347
2.2.5. Fill cross section 348
2.3. Plinth 349
2.4. Concrete face 351
2.4.1. Slab thickness 351
2.4.2. Concrete 351
2.4.3. Reinforcing 351
2.4.4. Joints 351
2.4.5. Joint details 351
CHAPTER 14
STATIC BEHAVIOUR OF EARTH-ROCKFILL DAMS
E. MARANHA das NEVES
1. INTRODUCTION 375
2. GEOMETRICAL PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL DATA
OF A SERIES OF EARTH-ROCKFILL DAMS 377
3. STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR AND EXPERIENCE 386
3.1. Construction materials 388
3.2. Placement techniques 389
3.3. Structural conception 389
3.3.1. Core slenderness 389
3.3.2. Inclination of the dam slopes 390
3.3.3. Ponti on of the core 391
3.3.4. Deformability of the different
zones of the dam 394
3.3.5. Filters 395
3.3.6. Shape of the valley 409
3.3.7. Configuration in plan 414
3.4. Final remarks 415
4. MODELLING THE STRUCTURAL BEHAVIOUR 416
4.1. Dam with a vertical core 419
4.2. Dam with a sloping core 423
4.3. Influence of the dam height 424
4.4. Deformations 426
4.5. Final remarks 428
6. CONCLUSIONS 439
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 440
REFERENCES 441
CHAPTER 15
DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF ROCKFILL DAM
E. YANAGISAWA
1. INTRODUCTION 449
7. CONCLUSIONS 467
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 468
REFERENCES 468
XVI
CHAPTER 16
MONITORING AND SAFETY EVALUATION OF ROCKFILL DAMS
A. VEIGA PINTO
1. INTRODUCTION 471
2. TYPE OF MEASUREMENTS 473
3. MONITORING SCHEME DESIGN 475
3.1. Selection of monitoring equipment 475
3.2. Selection of instruments locations 477
3.3. Installation plans and procedures
subsequent to construction phase 479
3.4. Monitoring frequencies 479
3.5. Plan of first filling 479
4. MONITORING EQUIPMENT 481
4.1. Triangulation and trilateration
networks 482
4.2. Precision levelling 483
4.3. Inclinometer 483
4.4. Fluid level settlement gauge 487
4.5. Horizontal displacements device 488
4.6. Total pressure cells 490
4.7. Piezometer 492
4.8. Seepage monitoring 495
4.9. Earthquake effect monitoring 497
5. READINGS, PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS 497
5.1. Data collection 497
5.2. Data transmission 499
5.3. Data processing and information storage 499
5.4. Data presentation 500
5.5. Performance evaluation 500
CHAPTER 17
PRINCIPLES OF ROCKFILL HYDRAULICS
R. MARTINS
1. INTRODUCTION 523
1.1. Definition of rockfill hydraulics 523
1.2. Complements to the former definition 524
1.3. Scope of rockfill hydraulics 525
1.4. Subjects dealt with in this chapter 525
2. CHARACTERIZATION OF ROCKFILL 526
REFERENCES 558
ANNEX 1: EXAMPLES OF CALCULATING THE
CARACTERISTIC. DIMENSIONS OF
BLOCK SETS. 564
CHAPTER 18
THROUGH AND OVERFLOW ROCKFILL DAMS
A. K. PARKIN
1. INTRODUCTION 571
XIX
CHAPTER 19
SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTROL OF NATURAL ROCKFILLS
H. EVRARD
1. INTRODUCTION 593
7. CONCLUSION 608
BIBLIOGRAPHY 609
CHAPl'ER 20
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE FACE DAMS
J. L. JUSTO
l. INTRODUCTION 6ll
2. REVETMENT STRUCTURE 623
3. CONSTRUCTION 625
5. PLINTHS 633
REFERENCES 648
A. PARKIN
Senior LeclIIrer, Monash Universiry Clayton, Melbourne, \lic((Jria 3168, Australia.
A. VEIGA PINTO
Senior Research Officer, Lab. Nac. Eng. Civil, Av. do Brasil 101, 1799 Lisboa Codex,
Portl.g,i/.
D. NAYLOR
Senior Leclllrer, University College of Swansea, Depart. of Civil Engineering, Single-
ton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, U. K.
E. YANAGISAWA
Professor, To/wku University, Depart. of Civil Engilleering, FaCility of EnRineerillg,
Aoha, Sendai 980, Japan.
If. EVRARD
Head of the Rock Mechanics Group, Laboratoire Regional des Ponts et Chaussee,
CETE de Lyon ]()9, Avenue Salvador-Allende CSE No.1 - 69674 Broil Cedex, France.
J. BRAUNS
Head of Section of Soil and Rock Mechanics, Karlsruhe University, Post/llcll 6980
D - 7500 Karlsruhe, Germany.
xxi
xxii
J. CHARLES
Geotechnics Division, Building Research Establishment Garston Watford WD2 7JR,
U.K.
1. DELGADO RODRIGUES
Principal Research Officer, Lab. Nac. Eng. Civil, Av. do Brasil 101, 1799 Lisboa
Codex, Portugal.
1. JuSTO ALPANES
Senior Lecturer, E. T. S. Arquitecture, Av. Reina Mercedes sin, 41012 Seville, Spain.
N. SOUSA PINTO
Consulting Engineering, Av. Vicente Machado, 2340 , 80430 Curitiba - PR, Brasil.
R. MARTINS
Principal Research, Lab. Nac. Eng. Civil, Av. do Brasil 101, 1799 Lisboa Codex,
Portugal.
FOREWORD
E. Mf" lmha das Nt ...,s (td.). Ad,ym cts;" Rodflll Sm,clltrrs. 1-5.
Cl I991 KII, ....r ' Academic P"b/ishtrs.
2
1 - Introduction
structures and textures vary widely, and each group has some
very specific features of its own. Some of them may be easily
deduced by any experienced person from this very general clas-
sification.
However, common engineering applications of rock materials
require more precise characteristics, preferably having close
connections with any parameter used in design methods. This
objective leads to the use of geotechnical classifications and
index properties. These items will be dealt with in the fol-
lowing chapters.
3.1 GENERAL
4.1. GENERAL
- intrinsic properties
- index properties
- shape and size properties
- durability properties
W max ('II.)
6
/
5
3
/
/
2 /
1 ~
/
/
o
o 1 2 3 456
W 2h ('Yo)
'0
PO"<OSI r y ('/.)
Or = 25 PLS
19
Or = 13 PLS
were found in the course of a study of greywackes (Delgado Ro-
drigues and Jeremias, 1989). Difficulty in having fully repre-
sentative samples motivated by the occurrence of lithologic
anisotropy and fissure and weathering heterogeneities account
for this abnormal correlation factor. Water content influences
both r and
PLS and should,
therefore, be taken into account
when testlng rock materlals.
Basically, PLS and crushing strength depend on the same rock
property - its tensile strength - and eventual preferences for
one of them mainly rely on the merit of the specific testing
characteristics. Simplicity, portability and versatility are
good reasons to prefer the point load test.
Some very well known tests are addressed to the characteri-
zation of the properties of rock surfaces and they may be in-
cluded in the generic term of hardness tests.
Schmidt hammer value (rebound hardness) is obtained by a
very simple and quick procedure, but it is rather imprecise
and highly dependent on the surface finishing state. The re-
quired equipment is very light and portable, but values should
be taken as rather rough approximations. Sawn and polished
surfaces substantially increase the reliability of test re-
sults.
Los Angeles abrasion value (abrasion hardness) is the weight
loss of a rock sample in the Los Angeles abrasion machine in
specified test conditions. It is a fairly reliable value, but
it is sensitive to the size of tested pieces. A very wide ex-
perience of using this parameter exists and many users con-
tinue to accept this test in spite of the large dimensions of
the samples required. Because each sample consists on a large
number of rock lumps, its preparation may take into account
the diversity of existing rock varieties (grain size, weather-
ing stage, lithologic variations, etc.) so that it is an easy
way of averaging the results and reducing the range of possi-
ble values. Obviously, when this is the objective, sample pre-
paration has to be made judiciously and the fact must be
pointed out in the test report.
Slake durability test was primarily designed for predicting
rock performance, in particular low strength types (Franklin
and Chandra, 1972). However, its simplicity makes it attrac-
tive for laboratory testing even outside that initial domain
of application. Its application to stronger materials requires
an increase in the testing duration, but it may prove to be
very interesting as a controlling parameter for changes in
stone resistance (Delgado Rodrigues, 1976). A few other expe-
riments have also shown that it may come into use as an index
test, namely for study of rockfill materials (Delgado Rodri-
gues et al. 1982, Veiga Pinto et al. 1986).
20
70
Weathered schist and graywacke 10 (d",)
0(') (saturated)
0 1 6 Id",)
Sound graywacke .. (saturated)
60
6 Sound basak o (d",)
40
10 15 20
Pa (kN)
400
rn
tL
Weathered schist and greywacke 1
0 Id"ll
(saturated)
~ 61'''11
Sound graywacke 1 (saturated)
"0 300
'a"
lJ.J Scorlaceous basalt
Sound granite
200
Do Iaslane 1 .. (dry)
x (saturated)
100
o
10 15
Pa (kN)
70
0 Id~J
0(") Weatl1ered schist and greywacke / (saturated)
[J
6. (dry)
60 Sound graywacke / A (saturated)
50
... Sound graMs _ ~dry)
0 Dolostone II (dry)
40
30
00 05 10 15
4.5. DURABILITY
01
DAR
1 + w
where,
and,
where,
27
10
5 DI
II All BII
2.5 CI
AI BI
2.5 5 10 20
A B C o
Swelling strain ,010. 4
Porosity (%)
IV @
10~--+---+-------~--------------~
III
5r---r---+-------~
II
2.5~
2.5 5 10 20
A B c D
IRD
n + 2a
where,
30
Acknowledgements
Some of the presented results were obtained by collaborative
work with Maranha das Neves, veiga pinto, M. Quinta Ferreira
and F. Telmo Jeremias.
References
COLLIS, L. and FOX, R.A. (Editors), 1985 - Aggregates: sand
gravel and crushed rock aggregates for construction pur-
poses. Published by the Geological Society, London, 220p.
I. Introd uction
Whil st all these condilion s are logicliL nOI all are capable of being mel in ull C:lses,
nor has it been proven thilt this is necessary. In fact, it is clear that some measure of
latitude exists (Charles and Wail s. 1980).
In their consideration of modelling requi rements, Marachi et al. (1972) noted. on
the basis of Henzian theory (as d id Lowe. 1964). that the frict io nal strength and
compressibi lity of an assembly of particles should be quite independent of panicle
size. In respect of model gradings. they wen I on to note earl y applications of scalping
"
E. Maranlw das N~"t!$ /~d. ). Ad\'QI1("~s in RocJ:fil/ S,mC',ures. 35-51.
e 1991 KllOwr AC'u"~mic P"t>lis"~rs.
36
2. Rockfill in Place
In the era of dumped rockfills, there was no restriction on the size of spalls that could
be accepted, and indeed large material was most desirable. With the move into
compacted rockfills, material must be spread in layers of 1 m or less for effective
compaction, which limits the maximum spall size to something rather less than this
(e.g. 2/3; Penman and Mitchell, 1970), oversize material being removed by raking.
More often, however, rockfills will be smaller than this, with maximum particle sizes
of 150 mm or so, particularly if derived from tunnel spoil. In all cases, however, these
sizes are well above the capability of normal laboratory testing equipment, so that the
determination of strength and deformational parameters must come from either the
substitution of a model rockfill of reduced size, or the use of large test equipment, or,
as proves to be the only realistic course, a combination of both.
The first use of large scale triaxial equipment for testing rockfill appears to have been
by Hall for the Isabella Dam project (US Corps of Engineers, L.A.), as reported by
Leps (1970). This, and other test facilities operating in North America, are tabulated
by Leps, with sample diameters of 0.2 up to 1.13 m and stone sizes generally limited
to one quarter of thisl. To this list, some others can be added, as in Table 1.
From these lists, it might be concluded that the majority of rockfill testing is done with
300 to 500 mm samples, with equipment larger than this either becoming extremely
expensive, or being restricted to vacuum loading.
1. The 1.13m and 0.9m machines at CFE Mexico and UC Berkeley, California, are no longer used
for rockfill testing. Rocklill testing at CFE is now based on O.3m diameter samples.
2. Fumigalli et aI., (1970) advise a value of 10, although current ISMES practice uses a lower limit
of 5. Marachi et a!., (1972) use 6 for aggregates with C = 5.
ll
37
basis for such figures, although rarely discussed, probably lies in the work of Holtz and
Gibbs (1956) who were able to obtain a consistent Mohr envelope for Did ~ 6, but
obtained higher values of f for Did = 4.
Table 1
The only other laboratory study that has set out to study Did as it affects <1>' is that
of Lewis (1956), testing loose single-sized crushed granites in two shear boxes (60 and
300 mm). These results show <1>' deviating from a common trend at a value of Did =
40 (Fig. 1). Whilst conditions within the rigid confines of a shear box are undoubtedly
more severe than for a triaxial test, or even oedeometer compression, this figure is
clearly excessive for use in triaxial modelling. It is also clear that empirically-based
values of Did, as above, have been producing plausible results for some years.
The choice of Did is probably determined to a greater degree by the effect it has on
compaction for the production of a sample of representative density and void ratio.
Oversized material leads to restricted mobility within the sample and is likely to result
in large voids at the sample perimeter (if not elsewhere). This may lead to membrane
indentation errors, or even perforation, as wel1 as causing density to be low. Clearly,
the oversize will become less critical with more finer material to flow into these voids,
or in the case of soft rocks where the necessary fines may be created during
compaction. On such a basis, Marachi et aI., (1969), as quoted by Charles and Watts
(1980), justify their selection of Did = 6, provided that not more than 30% of the
particles are in the maximum size range, essential1y conforming to the earlier work of
Holtz and Gibbs (1956).
38
50
Triaxial tests (av.>
45
--
300 x 300 Shear box
0'
40
35
Limit for
large box
30
01 10 10 100
Particle Size- mm
Apart from the Did issue, there is also the question of the absolute effect of
maximum particle size on <1>'. This receives rather more attention in literature, but
remains inconclusive, probably due to the difficulty of isolating the relevant parameters
(Charles and Watts, 1980). On theoretical grounds, Marachi et aI., (1972) argue that
friction parameters should not be particle size dependent, but on the basis of nine
investigations reviewed, there is a clear trend for <p' to decrease with increasing d.
Their own results later confirmed this (Fig. 2).
o 55
OROVILLE DAM MATERIAL
&
.
~ r---
D/d=6
-...
c:
.2
--
u
I.J...
~ ~
------
o 45
...c: 2900
-
~
--
c:
..... 4490
a "...
.!!
g' 35
<l: 10 25 50 100 250
Maximum Particle Size
Fig. 2. Variation of <P' with d in triaxial testing (after Marachi et aI., 1972)
39
The only investigators who have found <1>' to increase with d are Lewis (1956), who
seemed surprised that it should be so (Fig. 1), and Charles and Watts (1980) who
recorded a small increase in <1>'. From the variations shown in Fig. 2, it might be
concluded that d should not be too much less than 100 mm in order to be within a
degree or so of the field value of <1>'.
5. Model Gradings
Once the maximum allowable particle size (d) has been determined, a test mix
grading can be established in either of two ways (Fig. 3):
100~----------,---------~~----~-----'
Field
grading
oL---~----~~----------~~-----------
1 10 100 1000
Particle Size (mm)
Alternatively, the model grading may be produced by scalping (eg. Zeller et aI.,
1957; Fagnoul, 1969), wherein all material coarser than d is discarded. The percentage
passing any size smaller than d is then scaled up by a constant factor. It is just as
necessary as before to ensure that this scalped sample is representative of the field
rockfill, and if this should be in doubt then the laboratory sample should be prepared
by crushing down large stones. It might also be necessary to scalp the lower end of
a scaled grading if problems are encountered with drainage (as above) .
. The scaling choices will depend on the type of rock and its field grading. For hard
rock and narrow gradings, such as the crushed basalts of Marachi et aI., (1969), parallel
scaling is appropriate. For broader gradings with more fines, scalping may be more
suitable to avoid the problem of excessive fines, whilst for soft rocks which degrade
during compaction the scaling method may become unimportant. Most rocks will in
fact degrade to some degree on compaction such that precise control of model grading
is not possible, but, as noted by Charles and Watts (1980), there is no evidence that
such variations significantly affect <1>'.
The reliability of such modelling procedures must be evaluated by comparison with
field performance. This could be done by back-figuring from a slope failure, but slope
failures in rockfill are almost unknown and backfiguring is not without complications.
However, a very useful evaluation is possible from the work of Valstad and Str~m
(1976), who compared their laboratory data with a series of in situ plate load tests, in
connection with Svartevann Dam investigations. These plate load tests (analysed by
the Brinch-Hansen formula) indicated a value of <1> (for heavily rolled granitic gneiss)
of around 53, which proved to be substantially in excess of laboratory triaxial results
of around 45. It may still be arguable which figure is more credible.
Because rockfill is a highly frictional material, substantial shear stresses will develop
on the wall of an oedeometer during a compression test, so that the applied platen load
is not transmitted equally to all parts of the sample. It is possible for as much as 50%
of the applied platen load to be lost into the wall in this way. One possible means of
overcoming this problem is by the use of a compressible ring vessel, built up from
alternating rings of steel and a compressible material (such as cork or rubber), as in the
ISMES consolidometers of Fumigalli (1969). These machines, 600 and 1300mm dia.
with HID = 2 (and another 500 dia. at LNEC), rely on an initial calibration in
compression, which may not necessarily remain valid with a compacted sample in
place. Nor is there a description in literature of the type of support used during sample
formation. Although evidently successful, this concept has not been adopted elsewhere.
41
2
0~
c:
.......
0 4
III
"0
....u... 6
~
8
10
3. Frassoni et al. (1982) state that it is ISMES practice to limit stone size to D/IO, and show from
comparative tests that D < 500mm may lead to some error.
42
Lysterfield Hornfels
-~ p=22 tlm3 H=610mm
E
E
2
-:~~ Floating ring test
c I
.Q
+--
0 4
E...
.....0Cll
0
6 Sand
capping
_L
I
where K" is the coefficient of earth pressure at rest and 11 the coefficient of friction
of rockfill on the oedometer ring, the product 11K" lying within a narrow range (0.06
to 0.2) for most situations4 For substitution in Eq. (1) average stresses are computed
as
(2)
(3)
where L is the applied axial load and S is obtained from the final ring jacking test
(evidently as 2S). Substituting also d = 2h for the BRE oedometer and assuming S/2
to be small with respect to L leads to
(4)
and this inserted into Eq. (2) gives a value of cry corrected for side friction:
a (
- L 1 - -IlKo) /-d
1t 2 (5)
" 2 4
On the basis of a final jacking test on a sandstone, Penman and Charles (1976) found
that ilK" = (l.ll). indicating a side friction correction of ).7%.
Whilst thi, figure is entirely plausible, it cannot be readily verified as laboratory
predictions rarely match field peIi'ormance with this precision. Several other issues
must also be u\dressed, among them the fact that the jacking test, presumably
perfoIllled \\ ith the sample uncler axial compression, cannot be associated with any
particular v.tiue of L. and will have a distribution of shear stress that is very different
from the flo.pi"b ring test. Furthermore, the value of K for a compacted sample is not
4. These figures arc evidently drawn principally from Kjaemsli and Sande (1963), who record wall
loads in fixed ring test at 12 to 40% (average 20%) of axial load.
44
constant, but decreases with load and only approaches Ko at high stress. Finally,
whereas K can be validly applied to average stresses, a friction coefficient cannot, as
indicated in the fact that Eq. (J) cannot apply near the sample centre, where 't~0.
The alternative procedure was developed by Parkin and Adikari (1981), based on
an oedometer de~igned to operate in both fixed and floating ring modes, with provision
for the measurement of total wall load (F) in the latter cases. For each mode, a
distrihution of shear stress was asslImed to reflect the probable shear displacements,
as in Fig. 6.
In terms of the measured value of F, the corrected value of crv at mid depth will be
where A is the sample area, and <X = 0.75 and 0.25 for the fixed and floating rings.
This, however, is not the average stress on the samples, and the computation of average
stress should use <X = 0.67 and 0.17 respectively. If these corrections are applied to
the nominal stress-strain curves for the fixed and floating ring tests, a reasonable co-
ordination should result. The effectiveness of this may be judged from Fig. 7, noting
that further improvements might come from other assumed distributions of wall shear
stress. 6
5. The N(d ocdomclcr is also designed 10 opera Ie in both fixed and floating ring modes, and on the
basis of all avcr;\ge side friclion of 20% in Ibe fixed mode, a correction of 10% has been applied
10 !ltC Il(lal illg rillg mode (Kjaemsli and Sande, 1963). At Karlsruhe (Table I), the load transmitted
to the toltol1l platcn is recorded and used to evaluate side friction.
6. In practice, platen displacements are invariably not equal in a floating ring test (base being half or
less top), suggesting that the "neutral axis" may not be at mid hcight and that a value of ex = 0.17
may be low. This may result from greater density towards the sample basco
45
15.-------------------------------~~.,
o Fixed ring
o Flooting ring
a..
~
<f)
-
<f)
~
Ul
'0 05
u
:;:
'-
Q)
>
o 02 OA 0'6 08 10
Vertical Strain %
2
~
Sugarloaf Mudstone
....
<I>
p= 21 tlm 3
:l
If)
If) Fixed ring test
....
<I>
-
a...
.c
....
0
w
......
0
....:
......
<I>
0
U
a 05 10 15
(Jv MPa
7. A Case History
Blue Rock Dam is a central core earth and rockfill structure on the Tanjil River in
south-east Victoria, Australia. At the damsite, the valley is incised into Lower
Devonian mudstones and sandstones, overlaid at higher levels by weathered Tertiary
basalt, both strata being utilised for rockfill production (Murley, 1981).
7. Whilst most laboratories use air hammer compaction, the Karlsruhe facility uses static compaction,
which results in some fairly massive lateral pressures. This clearly creates a different type of pore
structure, at comparable global void ratios, and the procedure that is most relevant to practice is
a matter of conjecture.
8. This is not a problem for ISMES consolidometeT. Here approximately one ring in seven is
straingauged, and the measured values of crh appear to be good insofar as they correlate well with
triaxial tests via the Jaky formula (Frassoni et a!. 1982).
47
Load (kPa)
50 100 200 500 1000 2000
-40
'38
Sample No.3
pd = 200tlm 3
(I) 36
0
+=
0
a: 34
'0
0 Sample No.4
> '32 pd - 210 t/m 3
'30
28
Fig. 9. Void ratio - pressure relationships for mudstone, Blue Rock Dam
During field rolling trials, it was judged that the mudstone was the superior material,
although subject to thermal breakdown. It was designated as select rockfill and placed
in the upstream shoulder (3A). The basalt, being of low grade, was designated as
random roekfill and placed in the downstream shoulder (3B). The rolling trials
indicated that a density of 2.2 tlm3 could be achieved from four passes of a lOt
vibrating roller.
For triaxial testing, both materials were supplied sieved out into component
fractions, which were re-combined to prescribed gradings that were in principle scaled,
but modified somewhat to reduce an anticipated problem with fines. For these test
mixes <\nax = 75 mm, giving DId = 5, but there remained some 30 to 40% finer than
4.7 mm, extending down to dust (Cu around 1(0). During mixing and placement, it
was found to be difficult to prevent segregation, the effects of which are evident in Fig.
lOa. However, by increasing the number of layers from 5 to 8, a much improved
sample resulted (Fig. lOb). It will be clear from such photographs why the laboratory
density of 2.1 tlm3 is likely to be less than that from field rolling, although the internal
structure may still be representative.
For the first of the samples tested (Fig 6a) drainage proved to be so bad that loading
had to be extended over a period of four weeks. Hence for subsequent samples of the
3A roekfill, all material passing 4.7 mm was eliminated (and that passing 1.2 mm for
3B roekfill), by means of which testing was possible within a day.
However, whereas a density of 2.1 tlm3 was achieved with reasonable effort in the
3A material, it was found to require extreme effort in the case of the 3B material.
48
Fig. lO. Rockfill triaxial specimens, Blue Rock Dam (Parkin, 1983)
8. Conclusions
Since serious testing of rockfill began around 1960, it has been necessary to reach a
compromise between available size of test equipment and the tolerable degree of
particle scaling. Whilst in theory any level of particle scaling should be of no effect,
this cannot be relied upon and most people prefer not to scale too far.
Model gradings will generally be derived on the basis of scalping or scaling, or
some other compromise which may be dictated by the special circumstances of a
particular rockfill. Whether this is representative of rockfill in place may depend more
on the compactive effort or density than on particular details of grading, particularly
as these will normally be altered during compaction. Maximum particle size is limited
by the chosen DId ratio (4 minimum, but preferably 6), which is determined by
practical requirements for the production of a uniform representative sample.
49
0
2
- - 3A Rockfill
- - 38 Rockfill
-------,'-
a.. "'-
:?:
If)
""- \
If)
\
....
Q)
en \
.... \
0
Q)
..c
(f)
0 2 3 4 5
Normal stress M Pa
Fig. 11. Mohr circles for triaxial tests, Blue Rock Dam.
In the oedometer compression test, modelling also involves the design of the
oedometer and its principal dimensions, and the provision made for minimising and/or
correcting side friction. It is also emphasised that care should be taken to avoid
introducing a soft end condition that could distort observed stress-strain curves, and
further noted that some aspects of behaviour will be affected by the initial stress state.
In summary, the evidence would seem to indicate that predictions of <1>' from large
triaxial tests are mostly believable, although in the absence of a slope failure (which
even then is not easily backfigured) there is no real check. By contrast, settlement
predictions from oedometer tests are easily and almost invariably checked against field
performance, and found in most cases to under-predict rockfill stiffness in situ, despite
the considerable efforts made to minimise side friction.
Acknowledgement
Data on rockfill testing for Blue Rock Dam is included with the permission of the
Rural Water Commission of Victoria (Australia), for which the Author expresses his
thanks. In addition, Figs 5 and 8 are drawn from student projects by H. K. Lim and
Y. C. Wong and by G. Hesketh.
References
Charles, lA. and Watts, K.S. (1980). Influence of confining pressure on shear strength
of compacted rockfill. Geotechnique 30:4 pp. 353-367.
Fagnoul, A. (1969). Shear strength. 7th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. and Found. Engg.
Mexico. Spec. Session No. 13, pp. 191-200.
50
Frassoni, A., Hegg, U. and Rossi, P.P. (1982). Large-scale laboratory tests for the
mechanical characterization of granular materials for embankment dams.
Proceedings, 14th Int. Congr. on Large Dams, Rio de Janeiro, 4 : 727-751.
Fumigalli, E. (1969). Tests on cohesionless materials for rockfill dams. Proceedings,
ASCE, v. 95 no. SM1, Paper 6353, pp. 313-330.
Fumigalli, E., Mosconi, B. and Rossi, P.P. (1970). Laboratory tests on material and
static models for rockfill dams. Proceedings 10th Int. Congr. on Large Dams,
Montreal, 1:531-551.
Holtz, W. G. and Gipps, H.J. (1956). Triaxial tests on pervious gravelly soils.
Proceedings, ASCE, v.82 no. SM1, Paper 867.
Kjaernsli, B. and Sande, A. (1963). Compressibility of some coarse-grained materials.
Proceedings, European Conf. Soil Mech. and Found. Engg. Wiesbaden, 1 : 245-251.
Leps, T.M. (1970). Review of shearing strength of rockfill. Proceedings, ASCE, v.96
no. SM4, Paper 7394, pp. 1159-1170.
Lewis, J .G. (1956). Shear strength of rockfill. Proceedings, 2nd Australia - New
Zealand Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Engg. pp. 50-52.
Lowe, J. (1964). Shear strength of coarse embankment dam materials. Proceedings,
8th Int. Congr. Large Dams, Edinburgh, pp. 745-761.
Marachi, N.D., Chan, CK., Seed, H.B. and Duncan, J.M. (1969). Strength and
deformation characteristics of rockfill materials. Report TE-69-5, Univ. of
California, Berkeley.
Marachi, N.D., Chan, CK. and Seed, H.B. (1972). Evaluation of properties of rockfill
materials. Proceedings, ASCE, v.98 no. SM1, Paper 8672, pp. 95-114.
Marachi, N.D., Seed, H.B. and Chan, CK. (1969). Strength characteristics of rockfill
materials. 7th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. and Found. Engg., Mexico, Spec. Session No.
13, pp. 217-224.
Marsal, R.J. (1973). Mechanical properties of rockfill. In: Embankment-Dam
Engineering, Casagrande Volume (R.C Hirschfeld and S. J. Poulos, Eds.), pp 109-
200.
Murley, K. (1981). Blue Rock Dam Project, Tanjil River, Victoria. AN COLD
Bulletin No. 58 (February), pp 55-61.
Parkin, A.K. and Adikari, G.S.N. (1981). Rockfill deformation from large-scale tests.
Proceedings, 10th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. and Found. Engg. Stockholm, 4:727-731.
Parkin, A.K. (1983). Strength and compressibility of rockfill. Blue Rock Dam Project,
Tanjil River. Report to State Rivers and Water Supply Commission of Victoria, No.
83/1, Dept. of Civil Eng., Monash University.
Penman, A.D.M. and Mitchell, P.B. (1970). Initial behaviour of Scammonden Dam.
Proceedings, 10th Int. Congo on Large Dams, Montreal, 1: 169-187.
Penman, A.D.M. (1971). RockfiIl. Building Research Station Current Paper 15nl
(April), lOpp.
Penman, A. and Charles, J.A. (1976). The quality and suitability of rockfill used in
dam construction. Proceedings, 12th Int. Congr. on Large Dams, Mexico City, 1 :
533-566.
51
1. INTRODUCTION
The laboratory measurement of the shear strength of recompacted samples
of rockfill is reviewed with emphasis on the influence of stress level
on shear strength and its significance for the stability of rockfill
slopes. Much of the chapter deals with laboratory and analytical work
carried out at the Building Research Establishment (BRE).
Rockfills are generally characterised by high shear strength,
particularly when heavily compacted into a dense state. Although shear
strength can be of significance in relation to earth pressure and load
carrying properties, it is the relationship between shear strength and
slope stability that is of major importance for rockfill embankments.
The shear strength of uncompacted fills can be of interest, but the
primary concern in this paper is with the strength of engineered
heavily compacted rockfills typically used in embankments for dams.
In-situ determination of strength is difficult and the emphasis is
on the laboratory measurement of the strength of recompacted samples.
The parameter of major interest is ~', the drained angle of shearing
resistance (sometimes referred to as the angle of internal friction).
It has been customary to express the result of a single drained test as
a value of ~' such that
(1)
2. LABORATORY TESTS
3. STRAIN CONDITIONS
for q,'ps > 32. It was suggested that if !)l'ax< 32, assume !)l'ax= q,'ps.
Rearranging equation (2)
!)l' ps = 1. 5 (q,' ax) - 16 (3)
55
4. INITIAL POROSITY
5. CONFINING PRESSURE
When triaxial tests are carried out to derive shear strength parameters
for a stability analysis, it is important that appropriate values of
cell pressure are used. The stresses in the triaxial test should
correspond to the range of stress which will be encountered on
potential critical failure surfaces in the embankment slopes.
The shear strength of a rockfill is a function of the stress level
and stress history. In fill materials the stress history is usually
very simple and often the fill is normally consolidated. Typically the
Mohr failure envelope is a curve passing through the origin. In a
dense state the failure envelope shows marked curvature, while in a
loose state the failure envelope may be almost linear.
In general $' measured in drained tests on coarse grained soils
56
(6)
1500.---------------------------------,
Fill type ID
SGD Sandy gravel 0.95
SRD Soft rockfill 0.95
SRM Soft rockfill 0.70
1000
7f
(kPa)
500
o 500
o' (kPa)
~' (9)
Expressions of this type have been proposed for rock fill by Barton and
Kjaernsli (1981) and by Bolton (1986) for sands. The difference
between ~' at a particular stress and some basic value of~' (~'B) is
expressed in terms of a logarithmic function of the effective stress.
Figure 2, which shows ~' plotted against log 0'3 for sandy gravel and a
S8
ID Cl C2 ~'cv
60
50
cJ>'
(degrees)
D~~
40
Fill type ID
[:, Sandy gravel 0.95
0 Soft rockfill 0.95
30
10 100 1000
CJ3 (kPa)
(10 )
where $'B is the basic angle of shearing resistance, ~$' is the maximum
contribution of dilatancy, PTX is the value of 0'3 at which $'= $'B+
~$' /2. When 0'3= 0, $'= $'B+~$' and when 0'3~~, $'= $'B.
Usually a programme of tests is not carried out over a
sufficiently wide range of stresses to examine the validity of equation
(10). However Billam (1971) tested several materials in drained
triaxial compression tests over a range of confining pressures from 3
kPa to 10 MPa and his results on crushed anthracite have been used by
Maksimovik to illustrate the applicability of the above relationship.
This is shown in Figure 3. While it is clear that Maksimovik's
relationship does give a good approximation to Billam's data, the
experimental points could also be represented by a linear relationship
on the semi-log plot for confining pressures between 10 and 1000 kPa
which covers virtually the whole range of stresses which are of
practical interest.
50 I I I I
_ </J'o = --
.-........
48.6 0
.~ eBiI"m (1911) .
45 - I
\.<UBHr(l.;~x)
0
'<t
</J'
~
(degrees)
II
40 - '0-
-
<l
35 -
P TX =64.3kPa .~ -
</J'B = 32.2 0
- - . - .
30 I I I I
1 10
a 3 (kPa)
Figure 3. Shear strength of crushed anthracite ($' v log 0'3).
60
6. DILATANCY
7. PARTICLE SIZE
With many coarse grained soils, particularly rockfills, it will not be
possible to test at full size. Some procedure is then required for
scaling down the material for testing. Sometimes a sample is tested
that has a grading parallel to that in the field. However this can
mean that the sample contains an excessive quantity of fine material.
The simplest approach is to remove the oversize material and test the
remainder. Clearly laboratory tests should be carried out at the
largest size possible to minimise the extent to which a sample has to
have its particle size distribution scaled down. In relating laboratory
results to field behaviour, the effect of particle size on the shear
strength should be considered.
The maximum particle size used in the BRE triaxial tests was 38 mm
whereas rock fill embankments may contain rock fragments with a
dimension of a metre or more. Charles and Watts (1980) reviewed the
data concerning the relationship between shear strength and maximum
particle size and concluded that it may often be a relatively minor
effect, providing that the scaled material is still behaving as a free
draining granular fill.
It should first be established that the ratio of the significant
dimension of the testing equipment (L) to the maximum particle size of
the rockfill (Dmax) is adequate. In triaxial testing it is usually
considered that L/Dmax should be a least 6 where the significant
dimension L is the diameter of the sample. A larger ratio might be
required when testing uniformly graded fills.
The ratio is likely to be much more critical in shear box tests.
In these tests the position of the failure plane is defined by the
61
70 r--------,--------,--------~--------_,--------._------_,
, /
60
/
(degrees)
50
40
D
r /'..
0
Fill type
Sandy gravel
Soft rockfill
ID
0.95
0.95
30
+0.5 0 -0.5 -1 1.5 -2 -2.5
( d Ev )
dE, I
8. SLOPE STABILITY
"Curiously, when dumped rockfill was used, steeper slopes were
automatic, and when compacted lifts began, accompanied by laboratory
based theorisation, there has been a flattening of slopes" (De Mello,
1977) .
Rockfill dams were built in California in the second half of the
nineteenth century with slopes as steep as 1 vertical in 0.5 horizontal
(Galloway, 1939). Embankments up to 30 metres in height were built of
rock fill dumped loosely in position. The construction of slopes
63
5~--------------~--------------~--------------~
r 3 b= 0.8
b = 1 .0
1L-----------------~--------------~-------------------
0.5 1.5 2
cot p
cot ~
x
H 0
x (X,Y)
\',- '-
-1
\
\
\
3
\f \
\
.--
Y
H
2
lL-______- L_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _L -_ _ _ _ _ _- L_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _L -_ _ _ _ _ _ ~
0.5
cot p =2
0~--~--~72----~--~
1.5 2
cot {3
determined.
When the shear strength parameters A and b have been determined and a
factor of safety has been selected, the stability number can be
calculated using equation (11), r = IiIBl(l-b)
A
With the value of r calculated, the slope cot ~ can be ascertained from
Figure 5 using the stability numbers from the Bishop analysis.
has made it possible to produce charts for the rapid assessment of the
stability of rockfill slopes.
13.5. The stability number also indicates how the factor of safety is
related to the height of the slope; for geometrically similar slopes in
the same uniform rockfill the factor of safety
F l/H(l-b)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The work described in this paper formed part of the research programme
of BRE and the paper is published by permission of the Chief Executive
BRE. Crown copyright 1990.
REFERENCES
1. INTRODUCTION
Ov (1)
Dsec (2)
Dtan (3)
av (kPa)
o 500 1000 1500
o
Sandy gravel
a
(%)
'-------------'------------~-- .. -~----------'
10
12
1o
(kPa)O.5
2000
1000
o
Yo
O/sandstone
O~ rockfill
-0---
o 0.5
'0
av(kPa)
ar
fd
Test ID
(kN/m 3 )
a 16.4 0.24
d'2. ar 19.7 0.84
> 10
""' b 17.5 0.46
c 19.3 0.78
15
20~--------------------------------------------______~
3. FIELD PROPERTIES
Location Structure pd w ps n AV
Mg/m 3 % Mg/m3 % %
The five dams had porosities in the range 15% to 27% and this
81
(4)
~
w /'
Smax
/'
(m)
05 /'
/'
Ma
/'
/.Me
0/
0 2 3
'Y H2 (m)
D*
o. 200
,"
400mm
Obm ocf 6 be
Me
02 0
'r'J/ 02
/
G
A
/
0
F
n max
(m)
Bi0 /
h max
(m)
6
e V
/
s7
0
01 0 01
/
/LP
l~~
D
0 / FA
B'bo/' 04
/
/
/6
/ Ma
0 2 4
~e
6
/
0
0
/ 0
0 05 0 05
smax (m) smax (m)
Backfilling of different parts of the site took place between 1961 and
1970 with restoration completed in 1973. The fill was composed of
mudstone and sandstone and had been placed using truck and shovel and
dragline without any systematic compaction. Some information on
average fill density is given in Table 2 but wide variations occurred.
Pumping had been continued after the completion of backfilling and
had kept the water table below the level of the fill. Pumping stopped
in 1974 and the water table rose 34 m reaching a new equilibrium level
in 1977. In the period when pumping continued, settlements were very
small. When pumping stopped large movements occurred, the largest
settlement recorded so far (between 1973 and 1986) is 0.75 m. As the
ground water table rose, vertical compressions locally were as large as
2% but the average settlement measured over the full depth of inundated
backfill was smaller than 1%. Figure 8 shows the settlement measured
at the deepest part of the site. Although most of the measured
settlement can be attributed to the rising water table, significant
compression has also occurred well above the equilibrium water level.
Part of the site had been temporarily pre-loaded with a 30 m high
surcharge of fill and this greatly reduced subsequent settlement due to
the rising ground water table at this location.
74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86
O~~-,----,---,----.---.----'---'----.---.----.---.----r---'
100
-O'\.\~I:]...'V'V_'V_v_v_'V_v_v_v__ v_v_,, __,,__ v_7_v---v--v---"
E o~;i'..:~__"__"__ "_" __"____ , _ ---,,----,,---,,----,,------,,---~ --,,----,,----,,------"
E 200 \OO:D~o.
c:
(I) '0 \.o,,6~<>_<>-o--o-o-o--o--o---o---o-o--o
o o~o, 9
.,t300 \ '0--0",'0_____ 10
Q; "0 0 - - - - 0 - - - 0 - ___ 0 _ _ _ _ 0 _____ 0 - - - - 0 - - _ 0 _ _ _ _ _ 0
Vl
"'0-0
400
~o
--""""0
500 -0-0_0__0_ 1 _1- 0 - - 0 _ 0 _ _ _ _ _ 0
O,,--.---.--,,--.---,--.-~:~~.---.--.---.--.---,--,
11
10
_0-0-0-0 .2... 0-0 90--0--0--0---0-0---0
........ 0- 0 -:-
B-; ~~o 8
-
ON~
d'~
:0 Backfill
0.-
(I)
'" 40 /
/0
Cl
00
60 oJ
Natural
ground
s = a H 109(t2/tl) (6)
a = 0.13 ov (7)
o~~---------------------------------------------------
100
E
E
....C
Ql
E
Ql
-.::;
....Ql
Ul
200
L -_ _ _ _-L-_ _
At Megget Dam (a sandy gravel fill), with 0 < Ov < 1.0 MPa
(l = 0.04 ov (9)
0.3 ~------------------------------------------------,
(a) 73m high embankment of heavily
compacted sandstone and mudstone rockfill
o
o
0.2
ex
(%)
0.1
U v (MPa)
0.15 m have been measured on the compacted backfill and 0.28 m on the
uncompacted backfill. a for the uncompacted fill is about 1%.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work described in this paper was carried out as part of the
research programme of BRE and this paper is published by permission of
the Chief Executive BRE. Field measurements have been made with the
permission of, and in cooperation with, dam owners and their consulting
engineers: Scammonden and Wins car Dams - Yorkshire Water, Llyn Brianne
Dam - Welsh Water, Marchlyn Dam - Central Electricity Generating Board,
Megget Dam - Lothian Regional Council. Measurements at Horsley and
Blindwells opencast mining sites have been made in cooperation with
British Coal Opencast Executive.
93
12. APPENDIX A
CONSTANT EQUIVALENT CONSTRAINED MODULUS
13. APPENDIX B
STRESS PATHS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND RESERVOIR IMPOUNDING FOR UPSTREAM
MEMBRANE DAMS
REFERENCES
Charles J A (1973). Correlation between laboratory behaviour of
rockfill and field performance with particular reference to
Scammonden Dam. PhD thesis, University of London.
Charles J A (1976). The use of one-dimensional compression tests
and elastic theory in predicting deformations of rock fill
embankments. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol 13, no 3, pp
189-200.
Charles J A (1987). Discussion contribution on Collapse
compression of fills. Proceedings of 9th European Conference on
Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Dublin, vol 3, pp
1079-1080.
Charles J A, Naismith W A and Burford D (1977). Settlement of
backfill at Horsley restored opencast coal mining site.
Proceedings of Conference on Large Ground Movements and
Structures, Cardiff, pp 229-251. Pentech Press, London.
Charles J A, Hughes D B and Burford D (1984). The effect of a
rise of water table on the settlement of backfill at Horsley
restored opencast coal mining site, 1973-1983. Proceedings of
3rd International Conference on Ground Movements and Structures,
Cardiff, pp 423-442. Pentech Press, London.
95
l. Introduction
The widespread construction of rockfill dams has its origin in the California gold
rush. Owing to the avai lability of rock and knowledge of blasting, the miners of the
California mounta ins used rockfiJI dams to store wa ter for dry season sluic ing of
place r deposits.
In many of t he eart ier American dams rock-filling was largely placed by cable-
ways and was sometimes rehandled by derricks. The rock was often dropped from a
considerable height, up to 9 m, with the object of breaking up the weaker rocks.
breaking off sharp poi nts and thin edges, and attaining, thus, better compaction . An
example of this is Strawberry Dam, 43 m high, and ended in 1916.
In some Algerian dams built in the 1930's, the whole of the rock fill was placed by
derricks or by hand, us ing specially selected rock near the upt ream face. T his
method has reduced porosity to 25-32%, and the success to avoid settlement will
be commented later.
T his technique gave place to that of "high lift" placing, in wich the embankmen t
was carried forward in successive end-tips. The rolli ng of the pieces of rock down
the end slopes was inte nted to have the same effect as the falling of rock as indi-
cated in the previous paragraph: The lift was from 7 to 66 m.
No special efforts were made to wet rockfill during placement.
Strawberry Dam was one of the higher rockfill dams at the time of its completion
(19 16). It was a concrete face dam (Gomez Navarro and Juan Aracil, 1958). The
wett ing du ring construct ion was scarce, but there was an important flood at this
period, that wetted the rockfill.
Dix Dam was, at the end of its constructi on (1925), a la nd-mark in rockfill em-
bankments. According to our records its height, 84 m, exceeded in more than 50%
the preceding heigh t reco rd. The rockfill was litlle slu iced with monitors during
placement, and a flood with a head of 18 m of water saturated the lower part of
97
E. Maranh., das Ne-.'es (<,d.). Advanct"s in Rockfill Slr"cl"re.f. 97-152.
C> 199 1 KI"""er Academic Publishers.
98
NUMBER OF DAYS
5 10 15 20 25 30
w
(!)
r- ...J
...J
z -
~ ~ 0.25
ero
lJJ
n..I B
if)
h:
W
0.50
0
~~
~
0.75
-------~----~~~
w CROSS - SECTION
...J
~ OFDAM
w 1.0 0 L - -_ _---'-_ _ _ _L - -_ _---""~_"__"_-'>..L-_ ___'__ ___LJ
if)
Figure 1. Settlement of Dix River dam during a flood period (v. Nobari and Dun-
can, 1972).
Althoug the safety of the dam has never been impaired, leakage was, no doubt,
too large (2.7 m3 /s). It was constructed with up to 37 m lifts.
Salt Springs concrete face rockfill dam, 100 m high, ended in 1931, was the foll-
owing landmark. Sluicing ranged from 1/4 the volume of rockfill in the lower half
of the dam to much more in the upper part, with an average between the volume of
water and volume of rockfill of 2. This sluicing was estimated insufficient by Steele
and Cooke (1960). Leakage was 570 lis.
The same technique was used at Paradela (1958), 110 m high, with lifts of 66 m
and a volume of water of 4 times the volume of rockfill. Leakage was 3 m3 /s.
The importance of sluicing was clearly revealed during the construction of S. Gabriel
nQ 2 (Cogswell dam), concrete face and 85 m high.
The rock was cubic gneiss, with a compressive strength of 45 MPa, with less than
3% dust. It was placed in lifts less than 7.5 m high, and non sluiced.
"The contractor chose the use of shotcrete (gunite) as an alternative to concrete
for the sub-slab and the laminated facing. Construction of the facing followed pla-
cing of the rockfill and the packed rock part thereof, with a minimum of necessary
lag and by December 1933 had been about 33% completed.
On December 31, a major storm swept in from the Pacific Ocean which by noon
Jan'Jary 1, 1934 had yielded 382.8 mm of rain at the dam. The application of this
natural lubrication to the dry rockfill caused the latter to settle, specially that part
99
In an oedometer water jets were prepared that allowed to inject water under pres-
sure at a given moment of the test. Both the injection of water under pressure and
under no pressure produced the same effect: an aditional settlement around 20%.
Even more: when water under pressure was injected to the saturated rockfill, no
additional settlement was produced.
Martin (1970) has carried out very interesting tests, wetting rockfill with water and
several organic liquids.
Table I shows several physico-chemical properties of the liquids and the settle-
ments of two rockfills when wetted by them.
It is interesting to notice that in water most of the settlement occurs in the first
day, but in the other liquids the settlement is very slow.
Cohesion is, finally, the result of chemical bindings, who are of electrical nature. If
a liquid introduces itself in a fissure, the dielectric constant or dipolar moment
must playa role in the loss of cohesion.
Of course other factors must intervene: surface tension can measure the pene-
trability of the liquid, viscosity governs the speed of penetration, etc.
It seems that the constant best related to collapse, for a high value of dielectric
constant, is the ratio between dielectric constant and dipolar moment.
This is an important research line, which has not been duly investigated.
According to Terzaghi the water needed is that necessary to saturate the rock. In
San Gabriel 2, the rainfall that produced a settlement of 4.5% was an 11% of the
rockfill volume. According to Terzaghi less than 20% is needed. Experiments quo-
ted by Veiga Pinto (1983) indicate that a 30% of water produces the same effect as
saturation.
There are other reasons for sluicing under pressure as it is to decrease segrega-
tion. This method increased the density of the compacted layers at Mont Cenis
Dam test fill.
3. Collapse modelling
Nobari and Duncan (1972) in an extensive work analyze the collapse of rockfill
when flooded. After wetting, the stress-strain curve of rockfill is the one corres-
ponding to the saturated material as indicated in figures 3, 4 and 5.
The apply their findings to the calculation of the stresses and strains of a dam with
a central earth core during filling of the reservoir.
101
~
2.0
0
, Satu roted
z 2.5 Ih.
'fO----<~-.:.. E1 Infiernillo Diorite
0
(J)
(J)
3.0 Max. Size 7.6 em
W
Q: (f= 1600 kPo
L. 3.5
:::!!
0
u 4.0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ELAPSED TIME - THOUSA NOS OF MINUTES
Table I. Collapse of marble fine gravel (2-5 mm) obtained by artificial grinding
when flooded with different liquids.
Collapse in 0.01 rrrn
Dielectric Dipolar Ratio Viscosity Surface
Liquid constant moment centi- tension Days
debies poises
E lJ E/lJ ruN/rn 1 2 6 25 50
Water added
~-\
~ 2
~
~
;
I
+
.-0
c
dry
'-
.- 3
<II
.-C
<t 4
)(
Initially dry
5 then water added
o ~ __________________________________________________ ~
Water added
~ 2
+-
II>
D ()-..,,......:a.-::-_ _+ _______~"_I_a= 0.53
o ....
)( 3 ............. o. Pc C
<! Measured ....
relax.ation ~............... Pc
4 ~---1~0-0----20~0--~3~0~0~~4~0~0--~50~0~~6~0~0~-=70~O~--8~O~0~--~
Ax.ial pressure ( k Po)
Figure 4. Axial stress relaxation for wetting without volume change for Pyramid
material (Nobari and Duncan, 1972).
< sieve No.8 (ASTM)
> sieve No. 16 (ASTM)
ID = 83%
1400
""
-- --
1100 /
0
a..
.:Jt:
1000 /
/ " -----
Water I ,. .... '
b'" Added I
I 900 I
./ ,. '" "", Wet
b-
- ~/ " "
""
CI)
800
I
"
CI)
lLJ
0: 700 '/
I- ~
CI)
600
0:
0
I-
c::{
500
>
lLJ 400
0
300
200
100
4 6
--
Z 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
::il-
~z 0
Cl)lLJ
t.)t.)
_0: 2 - __
-------- _-------- --h- Dry
O:lLJ
t;ja.. 4
Dry -Wet Wet
::!E I
~~~~~-~-~-~~
~
...JIJI
0
>
6
------ I
> 0 2 4 6 8 14 10 12 16 18 20 22 24
AXIAL STRAIN, a (%)
Figure 5. Comparison of stress-strain and volume change curves for dry, wet and
dry-wet specimens in triaxial compression for Pyramid material (Nobari and Dun-
can, 1972)
0'3 = 300 kPa < sieve No.8 (ASTM)
> sieve No. 16 (ASTM) ID = 90%
106
Collapse Due
to Wetting
Rigid to
Fixed
boundaries
Compression
ring
c: A Dry compression
_1
-- --
o
....en
'- cr--.....a--~
Relaxation at--
constant volu me
Axial pressure, p
But in the rheological model, the decrease of stresses in the compressed soil leads
to a lack of equilibrium in the top plate between the stress in the upper part of the
plate, PA, and the pressure in the rockfill, PB. This difference will act when we free
the plate, compressing the sample that now obeys a different stress-strain law (path
Be in figure 7). This second step is carried out in the FE method transforming the
difference between the initial stresses of the element (PAin figure 7) and the new
ones (PB) corresponding to the initial strain under its new stress-strain law in nodal
forces, which now will act on the dam body.
This method is valid for any constitutive law.
Justo and Saura have developped a three-dimensional FE method, linear-elastic
108
in principle, but considering the no-tension strength of rockfiII, and different mo-
duli according to the direction of stress-change. In our case collapse has been simu-
lated by a decrease in the modulus of elasticity of the material, with the following
steps:
1. Relaxation of stresses in submerged elements, assuming there is no change in
displacements, in a proportion a, that is an entry of the program, obtained from
collapse tests.
The resulting stresses in the elements are (I-a) uij' and the residual stresses a. Uij
2. The residual stresses a.u ij are transformed into nodal forces through the corres-
ponding B matrix at each element, and the set of nodal forces of all relaxed ele-
ments is introduced as a load external to the structure.
3. The modulus of elasticity of the submerged elements becomes (I-a) E, where E
is the modulus corresponding to the as compacted rockfiII, obtained from measu-
rements during the construction period.
Hooke's law before and after relaxation is indicated below:
Before relaxation:
1
Eii = ---[uii-v(Ujj- ukk)] (1)
E
1
IJ
Y ij = ----- (2)
G
i = x,y,z
j = x,y,z
k = x,y,z
iT j ~ k
After relaxation:
1
Eii = --------- [0 jj (l-a)- v [0jj (1-a)- 0 kk (1-a)] (3)
E(1-a)
1 ij(1-a)
Y ij = ----------- (4)
G(1-a)
tions. For 0'1 from 500 to 1600 kPa an acceptable average value of \! is 0.22.
4. The stresses obtained from the action of these nodal forces must be added to
those existing before filling of the reservoir. In the submerged elements the cons-
truction stresses have been corrected multiplying by a factor (i-a).
A similar approach, but ussing a variable, hyperbolic, E value during construc-
tion is used by Alberro et aI. (1976), and Veiga Pinto (1983).
Naylor et aI. (1989) present the application of the same general method to any
constitutive law, and find with the K-G method, for Beliche dam, rather different
results than Veiga Pinto (1983) with a hyperbolic method. It will be interesting to
compare both calculations with the measured displacements during reservoir filling
to find the applicability of different constitutive laws.
Tables II and III show the variation of a in different types of rock with compac-
tion and stress level. Of course if the stress-strain curves are linear, then a is a
constant. It is possible to introduce different a values in the elements depending
upon stress level. At least in some materials the election of an average a value is
not more inaccurate than to obtain a from laboratory tests.
There is often (although not always) an increase of a with stress level. The infl-
uence of compaction is not clear. The relaxation coefficient is larger in soft rock.
Our FE method has been applied to Infiernillo dam. Values of a ranging from 20
to 30% have been chosen based upon laboratory tests and average stress level
(Justo and Saura, 1983). This allowed us to study the influence of a in the results.
Figure 8 shows the layout of instrumentation. Figure 9 shows the FE discretiza
tion.
Buoyancy in submerged rockfill has been taken into account generating nodal
forces equivalent to the corresponding uplift, and water pressure on the core is
introduced as external nodal forces on the upstream face of the core (v. Justo et
aI., 1989).
For buoyancy and water pressure two hypotheses concerning the modulus of de-
formation of the upstream shell have been made:
a) Maintaining the same modulus (Eo) obtained during construction.
b) Introducing a modulus much higher (E= 4 Eo) to take into account that they
are processes of unloading.
Justo (1990) has measured moduli during unloading ranging from 2 to 11 times
the values for loading in low grade rockfilI. As Infiernillo rockfill is sound grano-
diorite, we thought, that 4 might be a good average.
Figure 10 collects the calculated deformations in the vertical axis of the dam when
it is subject, separately, to the following processes (for E/Eo = 4):
- collapse
- buoyancy
- buoyancy + water loading.
The graphs indicate the small influence of buoyancy in the deflections of the dam.
110
Table II. Relaxation coefficient, a, as a function of stress level from oedometer test.
Stress
Type of rock COIIl>action level a Reference
(kPa)
average 0.34
Serpentine n=39.5% 200 0.34'0.30
3000 0.28'0.31
average 0.31
~eathered schist 10=100% 400 0.57 Veiga Pinto, 1983
and graywacke 2000 0.53
average 0.55
III
Table III. Relaxation coefficient in crushed basalt > 0.59 mm (Donaghe & Cohen,
1978).
Upper Stress a
size n level
(11111) (kPa) (%)
5500 0.30
25.4 0.29 gOO 0
5500 0.17
5500 0.39
76.2 0.28 ~200 0
5500 0.35
50.8 0.30 ~200 0
5500 0.30
25.4 0.32 ~400 0
5500 0.32
12.7 0.36 200 0.49
5500 0.35
6.35 0.40 200 0.49
5500 0.39
Average 0.23
112
.. B
160
St. 0 + :3 50 ~~.~t:===::::::----------- 180 200
o 50 100 200
r---=t I I
PLAN VIEW
Graphic scale (m) LEG END
x
DUMPED TRANSITION
ROCKFILL
I
I
140
II I.
I 120
l\
:\
I'
\ 100
\
I .
\
I
I
80 I
\ I
\
I
I \
" 14<;/./
I
I
/ I
"."
,/
,-'
f
.,-'
-20 -10 0 10 20 em -20 -10 a 10 em
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM SETTLEMENT HEAVE
COLLAPSE
Figure 10. Displacements at the axis of the dam during filling of the reservoir up to
normal top water level (Justo et aI., 1989).
In June 1964, the dam was filled up to a height of 90 m, when a flood overflowed
the cofferdam.
This situation was simulated by us and the calculated results are included in figu-
res 11 to 13 together with the displacements measured at the inlinometers I-I, I-II
and I-V (v. fig. 8)
These figures indicate a substantial improvement in agreement between calcu-
lated and measured results when a larger stiffness is assumed for the upstream
rockfill in processes of unloading (E/Eo = 4).
The model reflects rather precisely the upstream tilting that showed the core
115
140 140
120 120
100 100
80 ,. 80
I
I
60
40
20 20 20
Figure 11. Displacements at inclinometer I-I for a water height of 90 m (Justo et aI.,
1989).
/
120
120
/ 120
E
100
/
/ I-
:I:
100 100
/
i
C>
/ w
:r:
I
80 80 80
/
60
0 2 4em -2 0 2em - 2 0 2 em
DOWNSTREAM SETTLEMENT HEAVE DAM CENTER ABUTMENT
, 140 140
r 120 120
r
100
\\, 100
I
80 80,
, "-
/
- 60 - 60
E
~
I
(!)
40 40
t 40
t
w
f 20
I
20
20
We have also studied the situation of the dam when the normal top water level
was reached. Figures 14 to 16 refer to this situation.
Figure 15 collects the displacements at the vertical of the inclinometer I-I where a
direct comparison between measured and calculated displacements can be made.
In this figure a substantial improvement in the agreement between measured and
calculated displacements is reached when E/Eo = 4; The transverse movements
calculated under the hypothesis E/Eo = 1 are nearly four times the measured va-
lues.
117
~ .'-...,. 140
120
"'" '" 120
lOa
"'- 100
t-
:r:
\
\
(!)
80
w
I
:r:
60
--. --.
""'-
20
"-
:::-- .
10 20 30 40 50 em -10 10 em
DOWNSTREAM SETTLEMENT HEAVE
Figure 14. Displacements at the axis of symmetry of the dam during filling of the
reservoir up to normal top water level (Justo et aI., 1989).
The vertical displacements calculated under both hypotheses are similar, specia-
lly in the lower third of the dam.
Figure 17 compares the measured downstream movements at Oroville's dam and
other displacements calculated by Nobari and Duncan using a plane-strain FE
method based upon the hyperbolic stress-strain relationships developed by Kond-
ner and Duncan.
We see that the measured movements are smaller than the calculated ones.
The difference between the stresses measured by different methods in this dam
reflected the difficulty of properly measuring these otresses, and the only agree-
ment with the calculated stresses was that they were both quite small.
118
140
120
100
80
50
40
20 20 20
Figure 15. Displacements at inclinometer I-I for normal top water level (Justo et
al., 1989).
Alberro et al. (1976) have also used a plane-strain hyperbolic FE method for the
study of the filling of Jose M~ Morelos rockfill dam with poor IO;!SUItS.
119
'-....
'-..
I
I
I \ ,
140 ' \ \ 140
I
'\
............
"
I
" 120
\\ 120
120
''\..'" \\
\'
) \
, \ ,
100
/
100
\\ 100
,
,-' -,-'-,-'
I
"
80 / 80 I 80
60 60
t-
:x:
(!)
w 40 40 40
:x:
20 20 20
Figure 16, Displacements at inclinometer I-V for normal top water level (Justo et
al., 1989),
120
Instrument
House T
5 4 3 2 Instrument
House U
EI. 165
Graphic scale (m)
4 3 2
I I
o 50 100 EI.IOB
E 15
0
-
c:
0
Co Icu lated
0 10
CI)
"-
CI)
-0
E 5
-
0
....
CI)
U)
c: 0
~
0 7 6 54 3 2
0 Location
Horizontal deflections at EI. 165
10
E
E~ ~ Calculatec
'M"'~
c
--
c:
Q.l
.2 5
.'
L-
U)
c:
0
CI)
~:;::::
-0-....
-0-
--0
o Q.l
0-0 0
7 6 5 4 3 2 U
Location
Horizontal deflections at EI. lOB
The collapse settlement of the layer affected by a rise of the water level, dz, will
be:
1 1
ds c = [o+y(H2-z)](---~--- - --d---) dz (5)
Eoed Eoed
The collapse settlement of level H, when water rises from level H1, below, to level
H 2, above, is:
1 1 JH
sc = (---5--- ----CC-) [o+J( H2-z )]dz (6)
Eoed Eoed HI
1 1
sc = (---~--- - ---ci---)[(o+(H2)(H-H l )- V2y(H2-H2 1)] (7)
Eoed Eoed
1 1
sc = ---d---)[( o-t'yH2)- V2y(H-Hl)](H-H 1)
(---~--- - (8)
Eoed Eoed
122
1 1
Sc = (---5-- - ---a---)[o+yzY (H 2-H 1 +H2-H)](H-H1) (9)
Eoed Eoed
HI
(a) ( b)
I
0-+6' (H2-z) (J'tt(H 2-Z)
o t t t> stress
construction
slope 1/ Eged
stress relaxation
c
-
c straining under residual stress
~
( /) s lop e 1/ E~ed
collapse
buoyancy
slope 1/ E~ed
(c )
If we call:
the stress at the middle of the layer form HI to H at the end of construction, then
equation 9 becomes:
1 1
Sc = (---~--- - ---;3"--) av(H-Hl) (10)
Eoed Eoed
The collapse settlement of a layer of thickness H-H I is equal to the difference bet-
ween the unit strains, produced by the compaction unit weight, at the middle of the
layer, for saturated and compaction conditions, multiplied by the thickness of the la-
yer.
If HI = 0, then:
1 1
Sc = (---5--- - ---ci---)( + Y H2 - VzYH)H (11)
Eoed Eoed
1 1
Sc = (------- - --d---)OavH (12)
E~ed Eoed
When all collapse has taken place in a layer, buoyancy is still infinitesimal.
When water reaches the level H2, buoyancy at level z produces a decrease in ef-
fective stress of value:
The extension produced by this decrease in stress in the layer of thickness dz is:
(y-y')(H2-z)
dSb = - ---------------- dz (14)
su
Eoed
(16)
The buoyant heave of a layer of thickness H is equal to the uplift strain at the centre
of the layer for unloading conditions, multiplied by H.
If there is an initial water level HI, to find the buoyant heave at H for a rise from
HI to H2' it is necessary to substract the heave corresponding to the rise up to Ht
y-y'
sb 1 = - ------- 1/2H 21 (17)
su
Eoed
f 1 1
E
Ec = -------- (19)
1+ f
0+ Y(H2-z)
dS cr = ----cr------- f dz (20)
Eoed
- - - - - - - z.+dz
_______ z
o+y(H2 -H 1) +y'(Hrz)
ds cr = ---------------------------------
s f dz (21)
Eoed
I HI I H
ser = f[---s---I[o+y(H2-H 1)+y'(Hl-Z )]dz+ ---Cf--I[o+y(H2-z)]dz]
Eoed 0 Eoed HI
126
f
scr = ---~-- ([CH'1 (H Z-H 1)+'1'H 1]H 1 - 1/2 '1 'HIZ)+
Eoed
f
+ ------- ([o+'1HZ][H-HI]- Vz '1 [HZ-HIZ])
~ed
f
scr = ------- [0+'1 (Hz-HI) + Yz'1'H I ]H 1 +
E5ed
f
+ -------- [ 0 + '1 (HZ-H) + Y2'1 (H-H 1)](H-H 1) (ZZ)
Eged
o'avl av2
s = f[------- HI + ------- (H-HI)] (23)
cr s d
Eoed Eoed
where:
(24)
The creep settlement is equal to the sum of the average strains, produced by gravity
forces, of the different layers, multiplied by the thicknesses of the layers and by the
creep coefficient f.
For a homogeneous embankment we substitute in equation 22:
0=0
H2 = H
HI = 0
H = z
127
and have:
fY 1
scr = ---a---
(H - ---- z)z (25)
Eoed 2
Collapse of upstream shell has produced longitudinal cracks, usually in the contact
between upstream shell and core, in many earth core dams constructed with dum-
ped rockfill, specially when the inclination of the core is small:
Bear Creek (65 m high), Cedar Cliff (50 m), Cherry Valley (100 m), etc.
Longitudinal cracks have also appeared in clay core dams with compacted rock-
fill:
Cougar (136 m high; v. fig. 20); Djatiluhur (100 m high), with cracks penetrating the
core; Gepatsch (130 m).
Some have also suffered transverse cracks in the core: Mattmark (120), Cougar,
and Infiernillo (148 m high).
Figure 20 shows the relationship between pool elevation, settlement and downs-
tream movement at Cougar dam. It is easy to see that there is an increase in the
rate of settlement when the water rises, and some elastic rebound in the downs-
tream deflection for water lowering, but much smaller than the primary downs-
tream deflection, showing that the loading modulus is many times larger than the
unloading and reloading ones. The upstream shoulder settles more and deflects less
towards downstream than the downstream one, due to collapse, and the appearan-
ce of three longitudinal cracks.
In Infiernillo (fig. 21) transverse cracking of the core, as a result of the sudden fi-
lling of 90 m of water, appeared when water was at level 120, and the measured
tension strains approached -0.1 % near the abutment.
At the end of construction, no tension stresses appear in the calculation, in the last
layer, which agrees with the absence of transverse cracks in the core at that stage.
With water at level 120 comulative values of longitudinal strain and stress of
-0.51% (extension) and -2.7 kPa (tension) have been obtained. The cracking of the
core coincides with the appearance of tension stresses, as indicated by other aut-
hors.
Figure 22 shows a cross-section of Canales rockfill dam, 158 m high, the highest
embankment dam in Spain.
Rockfill was compacted in 1.5 m layers.
First impounding produced a differential collapse settlement aroun 85 cm (fig. 23)
between the upstream shell and the core on one side and the downstream filter and
rockfill on the other side. A longitudinal crack was produced (fig. 24)
128
Overbuild
E
Diversion tunnel closed sept. 24, 1963 (pool elevation 396 m)
Q)
550
>
~
500
W+-W v ....,
0
0 ,.... V "-' rv~lllll.\
IV 'Pool Elevation ,..r--
i.-.r'
Il... 450
100
E Hubs 11 8. 12 set Dec.1963
~
+- 75 k pstream Shoulder
c f-'
Q)
50
E v-
V -
T St,une,
Q)
25
Do rnrela
+-
+- i--"
Q)
(/)
60 Downstream Shoul,oer
E c
g .!:!~ 40 ~
-t;tE20 f
c Q) U ./
3::;:- t- f - /
Upstream Shoulder
o Q)
0"0 1964 1965 1966
Crest Deformations and Reservoir Level
120 m of crack
90 m of crock 15 cm maximum vertical offset
30 cm max. vertical offset 76 m of crack
Hub 12 Hub "no vertical of fset
~;)==i=I'-r-
Figure 20. Crest movements and cracks in Cougar dam (Pope, 1967)
129
Right
abutment
Left
abutmet
~
Crest settle ments
~~~--------------------~~~O
",' . ,"
"'"
./
./
/
/:;;,
/
10
Upstream
30
20
10
, o
Left
abutment
.........
- ... _- ....--_.- ....../ o
Right
10
abutment 20
o 30
o o
Tranverse crest displacements
Downstream
during water rise
Compression
Right
abut ment 0.2
x
fine / -
/'\~- ..... - - ....... .........
Left era ck s I ~/~::::~t::3;?~~ O. 1
abu t men t---i I},-/_=--"'9'7"'~c-...{----"'----------'''''''''''=-''---=:------1r-i'-~i-=0
" ...., IX 0.1 '--~...rJ1
" I x
'.1
0.2
Longitudinal strains in '1 I
crest during water rise II 0.3
x
Ex te nsion
Figure 21. Displacements and strains in crest during water rise at Infiernillo dam.
130
13.00
+f- 965.50
!L..-
845.00
.'~ =-
.' .. :~o:.{) >'", " ~.~ "\q
: ..: , . t . -':".
10.00
925.00
1 st phose
Figure 23. Canales roekfill dam. Differential settlement, about 85 em, between core
(to the right) and downstream filter and roekfill (to the left).
132
Figure 24. Canales rockfill dam. Differential settlement between core (to the left)
and downstream filter and rockfill (to the right). Observe longitudinal crack in con-
tact.
Yeguas dam was ended at the beginning of December 1987. Figure 25 shows the
lines of equal settlement during construction.
The settlements in the upstream and downstream parts of the core are appro-
ximately equal.
______
-
Schist and
raywacke
&
rockfill
186.00
'"
--t-.JJ.'-----l-~~_t- -- . .-
small reservoir for
construction PlXPoses
SECTION 0+210
Figure 25. Yeguas dam. Lines of equal settlement (m) during construction (begi-
nning of December 1987).
On the other hand, the settlements in the upstream shell are larger than in the
downstream one, because, during construction, a small reservoir (fig. 25) was held
between the upstream cofferdam and the core for water needs during construction
(between levels 171 and 187).
Figure 25 shows the lines of equal postconstructive settlements when the reser-
voir rose to the level indicated in the figure at the end of June 1988.
In Appendix 1, with the settlements of cells 10 and 16 during construction and du-
ring water rise up to level 213.34, assuming oedometric conditions, the following
parameters of the conglomerate have been found:
Modulus of linear deformation of compacted material (loading):
Ed = 38 MPa
SECTION 0+210
Figure 26. Yeguas dam. Lines of equal postconstructive settlement (m) when the
reservoir reached the level indicated (end of June 1988).
Figure 27 shows the beautiful aspect of the dam in August 1988. No cracks have
appeared on it. Leakage ranges from 2 to 4l/s.
The conglomerate was compacted in 40 cm layers, with six passes of a vibrating
roller with a mass of 10 Mg.
135
Figure 27. Yeguas rockfill dam (Spain) in August 88. Designer Engineer A. Pas-
tor.
In Martin Gonzalo rockfill dam impounding started the 2nd of Ferbruary 1987.
Leakage ranged from 4.2 to 9.S lis till the 26th of November when the height of
water was 31.6 m (fig. 28).
The 27 th of November several ruptures in the membrane produced a sudden in-
crease of leakage up to 1000 lis (v. Justo, 1988).
The dam was emptied, and, after a provisional repair, the membrane was retired
and substituted by an asphaltic facing.
Figure 28 shows the height of water inside the dam during the accident.
A preliminary evaluation of the parameters of the dam, assuming one-dimensi-
onal conditions, has been made in Appendix 2, with the following results:
Modulus of linear deformation of compacted material (loading):
Ed = 11.7MPa
ES = 10.0 MPa
1.5
i= 1.25 %
. .. :"~-.- ..
:~; '.:.',,~
o 10 20 m
Figure 28. MartIn Gonzalo rockfill dam. Water level and piezometric head the 1st
of December 1987. (Justo, 1988).
v = 0.3
Relaxation coefficient:
a = 0.15
Creep coefficient:
f = 1.3
The creep rates included in figures Ap. 2.2 and Ap. 2.3 are much larger than mea-
sured in other dams (v. Parkin at Chapter 9 of this book).
We see in figure Ap. 2.4 that wetting of the lower part of the dam increases the
creep rate not only in the wetted part of rockfill, but mainly in the upper (non wet-
ted) part. This fact has also been observed in Yeguas dam (v. fig. 26).
137
6
San 2.
5
4
+M MUWNGUSHI (SCHIST) I
3 I i I I
E
(,)
I V
2 '7
I-
VIIe; ~i
Z
w M
::E +
w
-I
l-
I-
10 2
Sw 1/ I
W 8 /
C/l
/
I- lI.st
6
C/l
w /
ex:
u
5
4
80/
::E 'I S
::::> I I I
/
::E 3
F
x
::E 2
V 8'
10 2
10 2 3 4 5 6 8 10
HEIGHT OF DAM (m)
Figure 29. Regression of maximum crest settlement versus dam height. Upstream
face dams of dumped rockfill poorly sluiced (Justo, 1986).
138
Figure 30 shows the same graph for well sluiced dumped rockfill dams. We see
that there is no advantage for using a high amount of water, such as happened in
Paradela (Pa) compared with smaller quantities such as in Salt Springs (Salt), as
commented in section 1.
~Jji
I I
(~Qlt6
10 2
Coul
8
6 (Wi)"
E
u
5
r- 4
(L 0) II
z
w 3 II
:E
w
...J 2
(Wis) li ( Is)
r-
r-
w
~ II
(Vi)
CI)
I ) en
(L02)
I I
r- IO 1 - - ( B.il
CI) / (N z)
w 8
a:: I7:-{M
u
6
:E 5
J
:::>
:E 4 /
x
<:(
:E 3 /
J (C on)
IT')
2 )(
10 2 3 4 5 6 8 102 2
HEIGHT OF DAM (m)
Figure 30. Regression of maximum crest settlement versus dam height. Upstream
face dams of dumped rockfill well sluiced (Justo, 1986).
139
Figure 31 represents in the same graph the regression lines corresponding to four
ways of placing rockfill. The two non-sluiced types of rockfill dam (a and b) have
the higher settlement, and compaction reduces greatly the post-constructive settle-
ments.
<+
3
2
v
V
II
I
(b)
10 2 7
( c)
8 I
6 I
E
0
5 I
I- 4 I ~'
z
w 3 I 1I
::E
w
...J
l-
I-
2
[7
/ 17/
~!
/
W
C/)
kI/ II
---
/
I- I~ (d) ./
I
~ 10 7 7 7 \
a:
u 8 7
I
-, I
./
\/
::E 6 I V
::>
5 I I I-
::E
x 4
V
/ / v
<t
::E
3
.I II ;"
./
/7 / //
J./
2
.///
10 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 2 2 3
HEIGHT OF DAM (m)
Figure 31. Regression lines corresponding to upstream facing dam, and four ways
of placing rockfill:
a) Hand or derrick placed
b) Dumped, poorly sluiced
c) Dumped, well sluiced
d) Compacted, three-dimensional crystalline lattice.
140
7. Conclusions
Collapse is one of the main causes of damage to the impervious element of dams.
Collapse is very important in uncompacted materials, specially when non sluiced,
but may also be potentially damaging in high dams with compacted rockfill, spe-
cially when the abutments are irregular and abrupt.
Collapse can be modelled and calculated through the finite element method with
sufficient precision to see the prospects of producing damage in the impervious
element.
In rockfill dams more than 100 m high, rockfill should be compacted in layers not
thicker than 80 em, and in general with vibratory rollers.
141
References
Alberro, J., Leon, J. L. and Guzman, M.A, 1976. "Jose Marfa Morelos". 'Com-
portamiento de Presas Construidas en Mexico'. Comisi6n Federal de Electrici-
dad, Mexico, 127-166.
Baumann, P., 1960. "Cogswell and San Gabriel dams". Trans. ASCE, 125:2A:29-
57.
Bertacchi, P. and Bellotti, R., 1970. "Experimental research on materials for
rockfill dams". 10th World Conf. Large Dams, Montreal, 1:511-529.
Cooke, J.B., 1984. "Progress in rockfill dams". J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, 110:10:
1381-1414.
Donaghe, R.T. and Cohen, M.W., 1978. "Strength and deformation properties of
rockfill". U.S.Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Technical Report
5-78-1.
Elsden, O. and Keefe, H.G., 19. "Embankment dams-Detail design and construc-
tion". 'Hidroelectric Engineering Practice'. Chapter IX. 'Embankment dams', pp
406-479.
Fumagalli, E., 1969. "Tests on cohesionless materials for rockfill dams". J. Soil
Mech., ASCE, SM1:313-330.
Gomez Navarro, J.L. y Juan-Aracil, J., 1958. "Presas de Embalse". Publications
of the E.T.S. Ingenieros de Caminos, Madrid.
J. Martin Vinas, 1970. "Contribuci6n a la explicaci6n fisicoqufmica del fen6meno
de asiento en escolleras cuando los materiales se ponen en contacto con agua".
Unpublished report.
Justo, J.L., 1968. "Deformaci6n de las Presas de Escollera". Fundaci6n Juan
March, Madrid.
Justo, J.L. and Saura, J., 1983. "Three-dimensional analysis of lnfiernillo dam
during construction and filling of the reservoir". lnt. J. Numerical Methods in
Geomechanics, Wiley, 7:225-243.
Justo, J.L., 1986. "Auscultaci6n y comportamiento de pedraplenes y presas de
materiales sueltos", Simposio sobre Terraplenes y otros Rellenos, Soc. Esp.
Mec. Suelo, Madrid, 315-355.
Justo, J.L., 1988. 'The failure of the impervious facing of Martin Gonzalo sockfill
dam'. 16th Congo Large Dams, San Francisco, Vol. 5, 252-262.
Justo, J.L., Saura, J. and Segovia, F., 1989. "A three-dimensional finite ele-
ment method for the study of the behaviour of embankment dams with thin
earth core during construction and filling of the reservoir". De Mello's Volume,
217-224.
Justo, J.L., 1990. "In situ tests". 'Advances in Rockfill Structures'. NATO ASI,
Lisbon.
Marsal, R.J., Moreno, E., Arenas, A, Guzman, M.A and Saldana, F., 1976. 'La
142
slO = 0.601 m
s16 = 0.449 m
slO = 0.34 m
s16 = 0.078 m
Setlement cells 10 and 16 are aproximately symmetrical respect to the axis of the
dam.
The settlement of cell 16 (downstream) has been used to find a rough estimate/of
the oedometric modulus of conglomerate with the compaction water content (Eoed
= 47 MPa).
The settlement of cell 10 (upstream) with this oedometric modulus would be 0.463
m. The difference between the actual settlement (0.601 m) and the calculated sett-
lement (0.463 m) may me ascribed to collapse and buoyancy.
Collapse and buoyancy during construction:
Equations 16 and 12 may be used to find the oedometric modulus of the satura-
ted material.
From plate loading tests, the unloading modulus of the saturated material was:
Marsal et al. (1976) have found an average Poisson's ratio of 0.26 (from 0.21 to
0.30) in measurements in sand and gravel during filling of the reservoir.
The oedometric modulus during unloading will be:
1 - \) 1 - 0.26
E~~d = ----------- ESU = ------------------- x 98.9
1- v-2 \)2 1-0.26-2xO.262
144
22.7-13.7 1
sb = - ------------ x --- x 13.32 = -0.007 m
121.000 2
Equation 12 gives:
1 1 13.3
0.145 = (------- - --------)(687 + 22.7x21 + 22.7x-----)x13.3
s
Eoed 47000 2
Figure 25 shows the lines of equal postconstructive settlement when the reservoir
rose to the level indicated in the figure at the end of June 1988.
The settlement of cell 16 may be ascribed to creep and can be calculated with the
help of equation 23 making HI = 0:
f = 0.115
For estimating the creep settlement of cell 10, we assume a position of the water
level intermediate between the ones of figures 25 and 26:
Vz(187 + 213.34)=200
687 + Vzx22.7x8 687 + 22.7x8 + Vzx13.7x21.4
scr = 0.115(8x-------------------- + 21.4----------------------------------)
47.000 34.000
scr = 0.089 m
145
22.7-137
sb 12 = - ----------- (36.lx30.5 - V2 x 30.5 2 - Vz x 13.32 )
121.000
Sb12 = - 0.041 m
Not very different from the one corresponding to the lower layer.
The average Eged is 31 MPa.
a = 0.35
31
ES = ------- = 25 MPa
1.224
146
The set of settlement plates C is placed near the main section of the dam and near
the axis. Figure Ap. 2.1 shows the settlement as a function of log time. Figure Ap.
2.2 shows the log of the rate of settlement as a function of log time.
1100
800
...
c:
CI)
...
CI)
... 600
c= CI)
VI
CI)
a.
E water level 264.2 - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - 1 c
.! 500
...
CI)
o
u
(/) 400
end of construction 8. beginning of impounding
OL-________~____~____~___L_L!_LI~---L-----L--L-~JI~----L
10 2 4 6 8 10 2 2 4 6 8 103 2
Time ( days)
Figure Ap. 2.1 Settlement versus log time at settlement plates C, level 282.143 m
(Martin Gonzalo Dam).
When impounding starts the rate of settlement increases probably due to the co-
llapse produced in the lower drain by the described leakage.
Leakage increases strongly when the rupture in the membrane is produced. We
147
have shown in figure Ap. 2.1 our estimate of collapse settlement, and in figure Ap.
2.2 the time during which we estimate that collapse settlement has occurred. The
rest is creep settlement.
0> I/)
......
0
0 "C1>
C\I
lOC\I
a.
+-
'" <i- <tl'-
-
ll) +-
L..
0
::l C tD 0 C\IC\I
.....
L..
+- C\I 0
-u'" '"0
C '"
0> C1>
lI)
> >
Cl>
-"
> C1> C1> lI)
0 u
-
Ol
... ...
"0 lI)
--
C 0
0- :::J -'"
0 c L.. 0 CUCl>
0
-
u a. ~ Cl>
0 0
10 c 0 E 0
3: 3: 3:
C1>
8
6 I
4
>-
0
""- 2
E
E
...c
C1>
E 8
C1>
6
:::C1>
I/)
4 -
'0
~
0
a:: 2 -
-I
10
8
6
10 2 4 6 8 102 2 4 6 8 Id 2
Days
Figure Ap. 2.2. Log of rate of settlement as a function of log time at settlement pla-
tes C, level 282.143 m (Martin Gonzalo Dam).
Figure Ap. 2.3 shows the settlement at the settlement plates C as a function of the
height of the dam and time.
At the end of rockfill placement, the maximum settlement, a little above the cen-
tre of the fill, is 1,000 mrn.
148
286 SETTLEMENT
(mm)
000
o 000
r0 {\J
[[]
280
\
\
\
\
\
[]]
270 \
\
\
\
\
\
\
[I]
260 Middle of rockfill E-
o
E .0
o
o
0.
.,
~
I @]~ 10
(.!) o 1-:;;
<.J 1.0
W
I 10.
o I~
., 1~
250 ~ 1u
@J Plate number. I
I
[1] CD End of till placing. I
End of construction and I
\
[] beginning of impounding. I
I
@ Max. water level be fore rupture. I
240
[1] @) Lost readings before rupture I
I
Assumed end of collapse cree.
Latest reddings.
[IJ Rock 0 Theoretical parabolic settle-
::::;::0'" ........... 7'" ----:: ment at end of till placing.
230
500 1000 1500
SETTLEMENT (mm)
Figure Ap. 2.3. Martin Gonzalo Dam. Settlement versus height at different dates.
Set of plates C.
149
yH2
Eged = --------- CAp. 2.1)
4 smax
d 22.5 x 53.03 2
Eoed = ----------------- = 15,788 kPa-::::-15.8 MPa
4x1
The theoretical parabolic settlement along the height of rockfill is given by the
equation:
y (H-z)z
s = ----------- (Ap.2.2)
z d
Eoed
We may see in figure Ap. 2.3 that the agreement between measured and calcu-
lated settlements at the end of fill placement is fair.
From the end of fill placement till the beginning of impounding there is creep,
represented to the right of figure Ap. 2.3.
We have also represented there the theoretical parabolic creep according to equa-
tion 25.
Up to a little more than half the height of the dam, creep is better represented by
a straight line. This means that the vertical creep of a layer is a percentage of the
height of the layer, independent of the pressure at which the layer is subject. This
"creep settlement" is, in figure 31, a 0.28% .
In the upper half, the creep settlement has the parabolic shape corresponding to
equation 25. If we apply equation 24 to the upper half of the dam, we have:
fx22.5
0.163 = -------- x 14.12 x 20.52
15,800
f = 0040
We represent in figure Ap. 2.4 the settlement occurring between the 2nd of Fe-
150
bruary 1987 (beginning of impounding) and the 6th April 1988, when the sett-
lement rate decreases to the level existing before leakage.
Crest of dam
286r-------------------__
@
280
o
272 (wate level d urino year 90)
270
E
260 the dam
250 5
230L-~--------~----------~---
100 500 1000
Settlement (mm)
Fig. Ap. 2.4 Martin Gonzalo Dam. Creep and collapse settlement versus height. Set
of plates C.
151
As indicated in figure 28 the level reached by water leaking at the axis of the dam
was 240 m. We see that although the rate of settlement at plate 11 strongly increa-
sed during this period, "most of the settlement during the so-called collapse pe-
riod" occurred above the water level.
Considering only the settlement below level 240, equations 12 and 16 may be used
to evaluate collapse.
The average pressure at the centre of the layer suffering collapse is:
a av = 49.52 x 22.5 = 1114 kPa before water rise
22.5-12.0
sb = - ------------ X V2 x 7.03 2 = -0.001 m negligible
316,000
1 1
0.0086 = (------- - ---------) x 1114 x 7.03
E~ed 15,800
a = 0.146
fx22.5
0.887 - 0.255 = --------- x 15.18 x 22.64
15.800
f = 1.29
We have included also, in figure Ap. 2.4, creep according to equation 25. We see
that the agreement with measured creep is fair.
The influence of water loading, not evaluated here, seems to be quite small.
CHAPTER 7
TEST FILLS AND IN SITU TESTS
1. 1... JUSTO
In situ test is the best established method fo r compaction cont rol in any kind of soil.
Laboratory compaction tests cannot usually be carried out in rockfill , because the
large sizes of rock cannot be introduced in the laboratory moulds. Usually it is not
allowable to employ sizes larger than one fifth the smaller inner dimension of the
container (v. Salas and Justo, 1975).
The use of s maller sizes and correctio ns is commonly not a llowable when the
~coarse" particles (nol introduced in the mould) are more than about 30% of the
total weight of roeHiIl, because the "fines" do not compact well insid e the skel e-
ton of the coarse particles in the field.
Thi s means that common laboratory compaction moulds can never be used to
compact true rockfi ll.
For that reason, in rockfiJI , in situ te sts must be used not only as a compaction
control, but also as a compaction reference.
There are three fill properties relevant in civil engineering works: permeability,
shear strength and deformability. The last two have a direct type relat ionship with
density that is usually, although not always in rockfi ll, more easy to measure.
It is interesting to remember the opinion of Sherad et al. (1963) respect to field
tests:
~Because of the large size of the individual rock particles, it lias not been con.side
red practicable or necessary on. most jobs to carry out any testing f or comrol during
cOltstrnctioff. At a few dams large-scale field density tests have been made by exca-
vating a large hole in the fill and measuring the volume of the hole by surveying.
For the ex te nsive tests at Goschenenalp dam, it was found necessary to dig out
about 190 m3 of rock in o rder to assure that the density cou ld be measured with an
accurayof 1%. The porosity (or densi ty) can be roughly estimated and often is, alt-
hough the value obtai ned is of little be nefit to the engineer and would nOl be of
'"
E. MoronilO dol NtlYS (M.). Adl'Onn~.s in RIXk/i1l Strucmrn. 153--193.
C 1991 KI_v:r Acodt mic Ptthli.shtrs.
154
much additional help even ifit were and exact quantily, the estimate is made by mea-
suring (1) the quantity of rock used (either by weighing it in trucks as it is delivered to
the dam or by measuring the volume in the quarry) and (2) the volume of the rockfill
section.
The porosity generally varies between 18 and 35%. The numerical value depends
primarily on the gradation of the rock and the percentage of the fines and only se-
condarily on the degree of compactness of the fill. In general, the higher the con-
tent of fines, the higher the density of the embankment and the lower the porosity.
The most valuable field testing on rockfill sections is that which is carried out to
determine the relative influence of the various types of compaction equipment and
effort. Since measurements of the density are almost impossible to make, the re-
sults of tests of various types of compactors can most easily be measured by leve-
lling the surface of the layer.
A method that has proved practical is to paint the exposed points of a number of
rocks on the surface of the layer being studied and to measure their elevations be-
fore and after compaction. The average difference in elevation gives and indicati-
on of the change in the density. With such field tests it is possible to study the in-
fluence of the thickness of the layer, the type and number of roller passes, and of
sluicing of the fill. For a given roller and layer thickness, we can determine the
number of passes at which additional coverages no longer give any large increase in
the density. However, these tests still do not give any assistance in evaluating the
problem of determining the influence of the method of compaction on the com-
pressibility of the embankment".
Up to here the quotation from Sherard et al.
We shall review the different kinds of in situ tests, and comment on them. Due to
the limitation of laboratory tests, the reference for in situ tests is usually obtained
from test fills.
2. Test fills
Fig. 1 shows the layout of one of the two test fills formed before the construction of
Martin Gonzalo rockfill dam. The plan dimension is 20x30 m (slopes not include-
d). According to Bertram (1973) the minimum size of a rectangular test fill should
be 9x18 m.
As seen in the figure, the test fill is longitudinally divided in two halves of lOx30
cm. In each half a different type of rock was employed.
In each half there are 35 measuring points (Bertram recommends around 25),
allowing to draw five transverse and one longitudinal profiles.
155
11
I I
---, f -
12~3f45 - T-'
3.00 345
i2 _.L-._ - - T-3
~
2
3.00
~~~EfJ-3~~
[3D
~
3.00
-,
3.00
14 4
~
~
-f2l-~ts-~ ~-~~.- - T-5
30.00 3.00
--e-r-
i6 !6
~
3.00
~
~t~~ ~ T-7
_t_
3.00
-. 8
3.00
12~9 4-;- '- T-9
1
~
~
12 345
3.00
- ~
!IO 110
~I I(f)
o LOADING TEST.
ca PERMEABILITY TEST.
o DENSITY TEST.
Cl WETTING MEASUREMET.
Figure 1. Layout of test fill with blown rockfill (Martin Gonzalo rockfill dam).
Side slopes of 1 vertical on 1.5 horizontal (fig. 2) are recommended, with ramps at
each end having 1 on 5 slopes for convenient travel of the tractor and roller.
Six layers were provided in each fill with the following thicknesses:
- 2 layers of 40 cm
- 2 layers of 60 cm
- 2 layers of 80 cm
Water was sprinkled from tank trucks after the layer had been extended (fig. 3) up
to the moment when water flowed through the base of the fill. That happened when
the volume of the water added was around 10.7% of the volume of the fill.
A time was waited for air-drying of the material before compaction.
Compaction was carried out with a Dynapac vibratory roller(fig. 4), with a mass of
12 Mg.
156
Bertram, after examining the results of test fills at the U.S.A., recommends the
use of vibrating rollers from 8 to 10 Mg, and perhaps larger, and layers from 60 to
90 cm. The same conclusion was reached by other authors.
He indicates also that the vibratory roller is not effective to compact rockfill with
an excess of fines. The frequency of the vibratory roller is another aspect that des-
erves consideration. At Venemo rockfill dam it was found that with 1,000 or 1,800
r.p.m. the settlement was larger than with 1,250.
The following in sity tests were carried out at the Martin Gonzalo test fill:
1. Plate loading tests under compaction moisture conditions or under saturation.
2. In situ density
3. Permeability tests.
A good rockfill needs usually high shear strength, and it generally fulfills this condi-
tion.
159
When employed in a dam shell, at least as important as that is to have a high per-
meability, and this condition is, also, generally accomplished.
Finally when employed in a road or a dam it needs an acceptable deformation
modulus. This is the most critical property for rockfill, because the lack of it might
impair the safety or the economy of the dam, through the need for freeboard, or
might produce the cracking of the impervious element or pavement.
Several laboratory methods are employed to find this modulus, and for field tests,
plate loading test.> have also been used.
As far as we know, the first plate loading tests on rockfill were performed by
Guilhamon and Castelnau (v. Justo 1968) around 1954 to check the effect of diff-
erent types of compactors on the rockfill of Iril Emda Dam, in Algier. The grain
size curve of the rockfill is indicated in figure 12.
The results reached are shown in table I.
160
Table I. Plate loading tests at Iril-Emda dam (Guilhamon and Castelnau, 1954).
Compaction
No compaction 5
Many passes of 21 Mg truck 30-40
1 Mg hand compactor 25
200 kg vibratory roller 25
15 Mg smooth roller High for small loads
10-15 for larger loads
1600 kg vibratory sledge 35 to 80 according to
m.mber of passes
LONGITUDINAL PROFILE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
1
-----'-
..... ~ ..........
-
- .....................
2
"-
.... _-----
3
4
5
E
0 0
I-
Z
w 2
~ 3
w '-'",
4
..J ......
I-
I-
5 '- '-,
w 6
C/)
'-.
7 _ _ _ UNCOMPACTED MATERIAL.
8 - - _ 2 COVERAGES OF COM PACTO R.
9 -._.-4
10 ____ 6
II
" "
"
I t t I
11
Figure 6. Settlements produced by compaction. Slate test fill. Layer thickness 0.6 m
Plate loading tests and settlement measurements at dam show that the modulus of
deformation is very high (200 MPa at least) for pressures less than 400 kPa. When
the pressure increases from 400 to 700 kPa, the modulus of deformation decreases
up to 50 MPa. Finally, when the pressure increases from 700 to 2,000 kPa, the mo-
161
100
I
I
90
I
80
/
70
(!)
60
/ I
~.
z
(f)
k/
/ II
(f)
50
/1/
<t /
a... /
40
0~
30
// J:/ /
/ V/
.........-< ..-
II
20 '"
10
~
V V
1..-/
/~
W
o ~
~
---- .- .-
~
Figure 16 shows the pressure-settlement curve for a plate loading test. The rockfill
was saturated after the settlements were stabilized under a pressure of 500 kPa.
From that point on a decrease in the modulus of deformation is observed.
The load was applied with a hydraulic jack (fig. 13 to 15), using as a reaction a
loaded truck, and is mesured with a manometer (fig. 12 and 13).
Settlements are measured with three dial gauges (fig. 14 and 15) whose average is
used to find the pressure settlement curve. The dial gauges are joined to bars who-
se support is far away from the plate, and rest on it.
The plate is placed on a horizontal levelled surface, interposing a fine layer of
normalized sand. Once the plate is levelled, an "initial" presure of 20 kPa is applied
to assure a uniform support, that corresponds to the zero of settlements.
The load was applied in increments of 50 kPa up to 250 kPa, and then in incre-
ments of 100 kPa. Unloading was made with decrements of 500 kPa. A new
increment was applied when the settlement in the previous loading interval is less
than 0.05 mm in 2 minutes.
163
pipes stoppers
--+
150
-/ ~/
\
\~l11Jlankment surface
25 mm galvanized pipe, in 1 m
--'--_._-
--- --- ,---
"'(.
To
I
I
Galvanized steel plate
- r---( 6 mm t hi c k )
W
o_~ __
o A
I
Measures in mm
-+
-+-- ~QQ_--+
PLAN
!
VIEW
Valstad and Str.0'm (1976) have found a values of Poisson's ratio during oedo-
meter test in rockfill of 0.2, little dependent upon porosity.
A summary of the tests is presented in tables II and III.
There was a wide sacattering in the moduli obtained during loading, which ran-
ged from 11 to 84 MPa, with an average value of 24 MPa for the compaction water
content. The plate loading tests were also continued, for compactation control, du-
ring dam construction.
El corresponds to the "initial" pressure to 500 kPa. The pressure interval of E2 is
165
Table I I. Average values of modulus of linear deformation obtained from plate loading tests
in Martin Gonzalo rockfill dam. In brackets number of tests ( = 0.3)
,------ I I I
I I IFirst loadingl Reloading
I lIater INo. ofl Plate I
ILocation Rockfi III 1 I 1 E1 E2 E E4 Layer
3
1 1 content 1tests Idi ameter 1
1 I 1 MPa MPa MPa MPa
1 1 1
1 1 1
1Test fi II ripped 1compact i on 1 2 30 cm 27
1 1 1
ITest fi II ripped Isaturated 1 3 30 cm 19
1 1 1
ITest fi II blown Icompact i on 1 12 30 cm 22 30
1 1 1
Test fi II blown Isaturated 1 12 30 cm 22
I 1
Dam blown Icompactionl 10 30 cm 20 32 59* 275* 1st to 4th
I 1
Dam blown Isaturated I 30 cm 13 22 51* 235* 1st to 4th
1 I
Dam blown Icompact i on I 14 45 cm 33 84 5th to 9th
1 I
Dam blown Isaturated I 2 45 cm 55 80 6th
I I
Dam blown Icompact i on I 9 45 cm 81 127 6th to 9th
1 I
Dam blown Icompactionl 60 cm 116 (8) 11 (7) 12th to 24thl
1 1 1 1
Dam blown Icompactionl 6 60 cm 1 56 35 12th to 24thl
I 1 I 1
Dam blown Icompaction 1 40 cm 123( 13) 15(11) 87 (10) 49 (9)123rd to 27thl
I I square 1 I 1
I I 1 I I
1compact i on I 123(59) 124(54) I 60*(10)1 275*(10)1 I
IAverages I I I 1 1 I 1 I
I 1compact i on I I 1 1 75 (25)1 56 (24)1 I
I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I
I 1saturated 1 115 (8)1 22 (17)1 51*(5) 1235*(5) I I
I 1 I 1 1 I 55 (2) I 80 (2) I I
*Unloading
166
Table III. Summary of moduli of deformation of rockfill from plate loading tests in
fill test and dam.
Loading Reloading Unloading
Water
Rockfill E11 E21 E1r E2r E1u E2u
content
(MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (Mpa)
as compacted 28
Ripped
saturated 19
Figure 11. Test fill at New Melones Dam, excavated for inspection (Bertram, 1973).
4. In situ density
M
Md = ------- (2)
l+w
I ____/ /
100r--------------.--------------~------~------~
90r-------------~--------------~~~--~~
/------~
/ //
80~-------------r----------~~~-,~--------~
/ //
~ 70r---------------4----------;I~~--~/v~---------------'
~ 60r----------------~-------;I~------4_--------------~
~ 50~------------~----J7~~----/~/~------------~
~ 40~------------4--/~L-----/~/~~------------~
30r--------------4~~------1----+--------------~
/V /1
20r------- ~~L4------~---+----------~
----
_____ /1
10r---~~~----~----~~-------+--------------~
~-----
O~~~--------~---------------L--------------~
I Ix 10 Ixlo2 Ixl03
PARTICLE SIZE (mm)
3. The hole is carefully covered with a plastic sheet. The plastic is filled with water
up to the level of the ground to find the volume of the hole V.
4. The dry density will be:
Md
P d = ----- (3)
V
Density measurements were also carried out in connection with permeability tests
inside a tube, as described in next section.
In Martin Gonzalo test fill with ripped material the densities reached by nuclear
methods, sand method and tube method were compared (v. Justo and Manzanares,
1983). The largest density was reached by nuclear methods; the sand method gave a
density of 92% of the former, and the tube method around 91 % the density of the
sand method.
169
5. Permeability test
Q
k = --------- (4)
5.5ro H
where:
Q = discharge
ro = inner tube diameter
H = height of water inside the tube
172
--
11
10
.... l.----'"
~
- V
~
::;.-
/
9 ~
(.!) /
-Clz
/
E 7
E
0
I- 6 0
z ...J
/
w u..
v
~
w 5
...J
l-
I-
W 4
/
(/)
V
3
/
/
2 /
/
/
./
V
a 100 200 300 400 5 00 600 700 800 900 1000
PRESSURE (kPa)
The coefficient of permeability can better be obtained from a falling head per-
meability test, according to the formula (v. Schmid, 1966):
ro In hd h 2
k = ---- -------------------------------- (5)
4 3(hrh2)
t2[------------ + 1]1/3 - t1
4t,srnr o
where:
173
@v CD @
55 - 55 ~
50 -
E
E SO
t- 40 - ~ 40
:::c S2 " ... ... , ,
t!>
30 W 30 - \
W :::c
:::c .-l /
/
/
~ 20
/
.-l
20 u.. "
.-l
G: ::.:::
'"
... ,.?'
::.::: 10 E =13.2 Mpa (h<l1 m) ulO ~
u 0
0
E = 9.0 Mpa (h>ll m) 0:: @
0:: , vC5) I I
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Table IV. Oedometric moduli measured, during construction in dams made of pre-
sumably soft rockfill.
Pd qu Eoed
Dam Rock
3
(Kgjm ) (MPa) (MPa)
Weighing the material taken from inside the tube and dividing by the volume co-
rresponding to the average diameter of the tube, a density test was carried out.
According to Schmid (1966), equation 5 gives a lower bound of the permeability.
The results reached by application of equations 4 and 5 are compared in Appen-
dix 2.
175
Eoed n
Dam Pd Placement
(MPa) % ( kg/m3 )
c = compacted
h derrick or hand placed
d = dumped
176
In Canales rockfill dam there was an abrupt change in one abutment (fig. 25).
Finite element computations showed the existence of high tension strains in the
upper part of the clay core (fig. 25 and 26), above that position and in the neigh-
bourhood of a steep abutment.
A test fill (fig. 27) was constructed with core material above a flat jack placed
across the base. This jack is composed of three flexible tubes, 20 cm in diameter
when inflated by water pressure. The three tubes are protected inside PVC sheets
and covered by mild steel plates, 3 mm thick. These plates distribute the jack pres-
sure upwards to the compacted clay embankment fill, until the tensile stresses in-
duced in the surface produce the cracking in the fill (fig. 28).
The horizontal strains are measured between fixed points (fig. 28) by means of
pirex rods and dial gauges with 0.01 mm precision. The vertical deflections are
measured by means of two rows of levelling marks placed at the same reference
points (fig. 27 and 28), 50 cm apart in the central part and 75 cm in the outer zo-
ne.
177
100
90
80
70
(.!) 60
z
(f)
(f)
<t 50
a..
0~
40
30
20
10
0
100 10 0.1
PARTICLE SIZ E ( mm)
In order to avoid moisture content losses during the test, the clay is covered with
parafine oil.
Figure 29 shows the vertical displacement of the reference points for different
jack pressures.
In figure 30 the strains, either tensile or compressive, between each pair of mea-
suring points, are plotted against jack pressure.
The first crack appeared between points 5 and 6 for a jack pressure of 340 kPa. At
this moment the unit tensile strain between such points was 0.24%.
The measurements were analyzed by the finite element method, and the follo-
wing conclusions were reached:
1. Up to a tensile strain of 5 x 10- 4 the stress-strain behaviour was linear.
The modulus of deformation in the tension zone was in the range 24-38 MPa, and
for the compression zone 13-30 MPa.
2. When the first crack appeared the mean modulus was 12 MPa
3. The field cracking strain (0.24%) was inside the range of the laboratory test re-
178
Figure 20. In situ density test by the sand method in the top suface of rockfill.
Figure 21. In situ density test by the plastic method. (Torres Novas-Fatima rockfill
embankment, Portugal).
(6)
The second problem is the evaluation of Ny as a function of cp', because there are
several expressions (v. De Beer, 1970). The following expression is recommended
(v. Jimenez Salas & Justo, 1981; Brinch Hausen, 1970):
tan'" 2 1T ,
N y = 1.5 [e1T 'I' tan (--- + ---)-1] tan ' (8)
4 2
180
120
Eoed= 168 M Po
~ d= 1760 kg/~
110
100 11
90
c 80
a..
~
en 70
::::>
-.J
::::>
0 60
0
~
C,;)
50
a::
t-
w
::!:
0 40
0
w
30
20
10
0
0 o o o o o o
o(\J o o o o o
0
0 v CD eX)
o(\J (\J
(\J
c' = 32 - 80 kPa
182
' = 28.6
Figure 24. Tubes driven in ripped slate rockfill for permeability tests.
8. Conclusions
Owing to the large size of rockfill, in situ tests are invaluable tools to find the pa-
rameters for calculations and check the compaction.
Although both, laboratory and in situ tests have their place in rockfill testing, we
183
believe that there is a trend for an increasing use of the latter, and that this trend
will be reinforced in the future.
Figure 25. Longitudinal profile of Canales dam, showing zones of possible tensile
cracking (Bravo et al.,1988)
a & b tensile strain zones.
o 0 0 0
2t-
~
~ ~
If) If)
fl.
If)
~lllt.II.'
o 0 0 0000
~ ~~~~~~
If) If) II) II) II) II) II)
N r<i -i.ol!i1'-CO
. .
1\ I\, ~ 0:.TI
~\..v I
" 1--. .......
H
"017
CS'I
77
~
""'I"'-/V~ ~/\/~I v"v'\/V\;'\/\/'r17
~/
V
""'/
Vl
Figure 26. Isolines of tensile strain for a crest settlement of 1.5 m. For situation of a
& b see figure 25 (Bravo et al.,1988).
184
11. 5 m
1 1
,I I, ,
I I,
I I I
1 2 3 4' 5 7 8 9 10
ROW I _ _......H'He;'-.-~.-..
e
" , I 5m 8.5m
,I,
ROW II ........t-ff--ei--4. . .~........-e
TWO SUPERFICIAL I I ,
II I
EXTENSOMETERS ROWS I I
THREE FLEXIBLE
PLAN VIEW
MATERIAL TUBES
I.. 8m
1 2345678910
PRECISSION TOPOGRAPHIC
LEVELLING DEVICES 2.5m
STEEL PLATE
Figure 27. Test fill for tension test of core at Canales dam (Uriel and Perez, 1981).
For both types of test, more reserarch is needed to find the true relationship bet-
ween the parameters found in the tests and the ones that would be relevant for the
calculation of the dam. This should be obtained from more comparisons between
calculated and measured deflections (and perhaps stresses) in the dam.
185
Figure 28. Cracking in test fill for tension test of core material (in rockfill dam).
Observe strain meters and levelling marks (courtesy of M. Alonso Franco).
E 20
~
f-
Z
w 15
:::!'
w
U
<{
--'
0- 10
~
0
;i 5
u
f-
a:
w
> 0
Figure 29. Vertical displacements at reference points (Uriel and Perez, 1981).
186
0
4
I I
REFERENCE POINTS NUMBER
I 2 81 7
6-7
-
0~
3
I //1 ,_
FIRST CRACK OBS ERVED / / /5-6
N:
2
I
////(
a::
t- / / ,./4-5
(f)
2 [; ,//,t1 8-9-
w
=:! , / / I
(f)
2 I /
/ /
/ .
/ I/ I
W
I
/
t- / / / I
// .
I
I
I
/~/ ,/
//
.~
r:- /1'3-4
",/ ./~//
-.:;... ~~-::-~-:-;/ .... -
I
I
I
/
/
0
0
--==-
~~
0~
FLAT JACK
"---- ~
,-PRESSURE (k Po)
2
<t "'---
a:: "- \. I
1\9'-1~l2'3
10
t- f',
(f)
-1
w \\ I
>
(f)
~ -2 !
5.0
0
Cl.
:::E
0-
W
0::
:::> 2.5
en
(f)
w
0::
Cl. Plate
W diameter:
l;i B=500mm
...J
Cl.
10 15
RELATIVE SETTLEMENT, 5/8 (%)
Figure 31. Tipical pressure-settlement curve for a plate bearing test (Valstad and
Str m, 1976).
187
Pressure cells
00 OC!
000
Abutment
o
o
Rockfill
00
o
References
Bertram, G.E. (1973) 'Field tests for compacted rockfill' Embankment dam En-
gineering, Casagrande Volume, Wiley, N.Y, 1-19.
Bravo, G., Uriel, S. and Perez, J.R. (1988). 'Anti-cracking measures in the Cana-
les Dam', Our Work on Dam Construction, MOPU, Spain, 123-139.
Brinch Hansen, J. (1970) 'A revised and extended formula for bearing capacity'.
Danish Geotechnical Institute, Bull. No. 28,5-11.
Bureau of Redamation (1980) Manual de Tierras, Editorial Tecnica Bellisco,
Madrid.
Coba (1990) 'Rockfill embankments of the Torres Novas-Fatima section of the
northern motorway'.
De Beer, E.E. (1970) 'Experimental determination of the shape factors and the
bearing capacity factors of sand', Ge6thecnique, 20:4:387-441.
Del Campo, J. (1984) Pedraplen de ensayo. Presa de Martin Gonzalo, Unpu-
blished report.
Jain, S. and Gupta, RC. (1974) 'In situ shear test for rock fills', J. Geotech. Eng.,
ASCE,100:GT9:1031-1050.
Jimenez Salas, J.A and Justo, J. L. (1981) 'Geotecnia y Cimientos II'Rueda,
Madrid.
Justo, J.L. and Manzanares, J.L. (1983) 'Informe sobre las caracterfsticas de los
materiales utilizables en la presa de Martin Gonzalo y su repercusi6n en el dise-
no de la misma', Confederaci6n Hidrografica del Guadalquivir, C6rdoba (Espa-
na), Unpublished report.
Justo, J.L., Canete, P. and Del Campo, J. (1985) 'El empleo de rocas de baja
resistencia en los espaldones de presas de materiales sueltos', Revista de Obras
Publicas, Madrid, Mayo-Junio, 463-473.
Justo, J.L., Cafiete, P., Manzanares, J.L., del Campo, J., y de Porcellinis, P. (1988)
'The upstream facing of Martin Gonzalo rockfill dam', 17th Congo Large Dams,
San Francisco, 2:815-837.
Ranjan, G. and Prakash, S. (1975). Discussion to 'In situ shear test for rockfills',
J. Geotech. Eng., ASCE, 101:983-985.
Salas, J.AJ. and Justo, J.L. (1975) Geotecnia y Cimientos I, Rueda, Madrid.
Schmid, W.E. (1966) 'Field determination of permeability by the infiltration test'
Symposium on Permeability and Capillarity of Soils, ASTM, STP 417, 142-158.
Segovia, F. (1989) 'Estudio de presas de escollera con pantalla mediante un me-
todo de elementos finitos tridimensional' Ph. D. Thesis, Poly technical Universi-
ty of Madrid, Spain.
Sherard, J.L., Woodward, R.J., Gizienski, S.F. and Clevenger, W.A (1963) Earth
and Earth-Rock Dams, Wiley, N.Y.
189
x.
_ - - '_ _-'-_--L_..........:L-_---L_---.JL-_ _ _ _--.,I<.._-'::!.'Ia'=-'n~ot reference
dx.
(Ap.1.1)
Assuming the excavation is filled instanteneously, the solution of this equation is:
(Ap. 1.2)
dh dx
-n '" Sr ---- (Ap.1.3)
dt dt
Darcy's law:
Q dh h+x
v = ---- = - ---- = ki = k ------ (Ap.1.4)
S dt x
191
dx ho n i\ Srx + x
n /I, Sr ---- = k -----------------
dt x
k x
------- dt = -------------------- dx
n/l,Sr h o +x(l-n/l,Sr)
k(l-n/l, Sr) ho
-------------- dt = [1 - --------------------1dx
n/l,Sr h o +x(l-n/l,Sr)
k(l-n/l,Sr) ho h o +x(l-n/l,Sr)
--------------/I,t = x - ------------ In --------------------
n /I, Sr (1-n /I, Sr) ho
I-n/l, Sr
h o- h----------
k(l-n /l,Sr) /I, h ho n/l, Sr
--------------/I,t = - -------- - ------------ In -----------------
n /l,Sr n/l,Sr (l-n/l,Sr) ho
1 6h 1 hon6S r ho-h(l-n6Sr)
k = -( ---------- ---- + ---- -------------- In ------------------)
I-n 6 S r 6t /l,t (l-n/l,Sr)2 hon6S r
192
1 Lh 1 hon LS r hn L S[1"l1
k = -( ---------- ---- + ---- -------------- In------------)
I-n6S r 6t I'll (1-n6S r )2 hon6S r
Example:
Srw = 90%
I-n LS r = 1-0.2xO.8 = 0.84
ho = 25 cm
6h = - 2cm 6t = 180 s
1 -2 1 25xO.16 23xO.16 + 2
k = -( ----- x ---- + ----- x ---------- In--------------)
0.84 180 180 0.84 2 25xO.16
Lh = - 5 cm 6t = 360 s
5 1 25xO.16 2OXO.16 + 5
k = ------------ - ----- ---------- In --------------
0.84x360 360 0.84 2 25xO.16
11 1 14xO.16+ 11
k = ------------ - ----- x 5.67 In---------------
0.84x180 100 4
Now let's see the result reached with equation 5 (section 5), with tube tests:
ro = 10.25 em
hI = 40 em
h2 = 20 em
t1 = 0
t2 = 192 s
f',Srn = 0.16
10.25 In2
kl = -------- -------------------------------- = 5.2 x 10-3 emls
4 3x20
192[--------------- + 1] 1/3
4xO.16x20.5
Equation 4 gives:
6,601.27
k2 = ----------------------- = 20.3xlO-3 emls
192x5.5x 1O.25x30
CHAPTER 8
LABORATOR Y TESTING AN D QUA LIT Y CONTROL OF ROCK FILL - GERMA N
PRACTICE
J. BRA UNS and K . KAST
1. Introduction
'"
E. M arall/Itl das Nc\"cs (ed.) , Ad"onces in Rocl::[il/ Structllr /!s, L 9~219.
Cl ]99 1 KI""'er Acodemic Publishers.
196
2. General Aspects
Oz:: a,
FFkT~~'l
I,BREAKAGE
3,5
3
P
ct
2,5
2
~
1.5
1\I,-Jt49'fncrAL
0,8 8
1+L 80
Q7 35
MAX STRESS RATIO ...
'0>-----1
.~_,
40
50
60-
81%1
.-----
12r---------------,
/03.SMN/m2
8 / "..0.2
6
/ /rI'.__.---.3
-2 " --.--
\'
"
6 12 18
--~.-_
24
-1,5
~
-4
\'
\\ "'.
.,
-6 '\
,' ""
\
-8
\ " " "'-,
-10
"", , " , '.3
- 12 .,
'-,
_~~----------'.~5~
'>UlUMETRIC STRAIN tv 1%1
01 - 03 [kp/cm 2 ]
3o.---------------------T.~~lTTr.~~r.~~~C
SED
20
10
o Jlo;;;:=~.....::--+-----:7.t-5----i:l0----l~2.':"5---:115
'- :-------,...--
--- ----
E 1 ['1.]
-_ SED
5
G N7'-- _ _
10L-----------------------------~
EV ['/.] (COMPRESSION)
W >-~
I ~'Jj
- 80
~
I
FLUVIAL SEDIMENTS
0, ~ 6 bar ~
~
iJ
'"
iii 60 ,,/' {1 - ..
3:
>- r--r-' ./' "'-/
ro I
40 i
;;"
- ,.- .L l ~L_-'-_
- - -- .- -
20 "..- V /~ QUARRIED
GNEISS
.-- .--' :.-- .--"" 11 0, ~ 4.S bar
a .- ~ f- '-'"
006 0.1 02 0.4 0.6 10 2.0 4 6 10 20 40 60 100 200 400 600
GRAIN SIZE [mm I -- ...
l"/
I ,.
-1 12 E,[%]
-2
-3
-4
tv [%]
+---CRANE
HYDRAULIC
MOTOR FEED
~--- ~~~rSSION
i i r + - - - CYLINDER
r.~~~~~-.-~-~-~-~SAM~E
BASE
CONCRETE BLOCK
- ELASTIC SUf'PORT
/ 7 7 / ?
OISTAt+C1E TUBES
TO AO .... PT '0"
, r - - - J_ ~ --, I
I
.
~
I
I
I
r- [--
IST_L~~~;:-I'o~o
l-r-r-r..t"auo.~ .~
"
: __L
Figure 12. Oedometer cell with stiff cylinder and special
load measuring device.
209
r-,
O. 40 load periods [min 1
N
,
E 0.35 r 100 1 '20 (5,'50
60 90 135 120 180
"-
z
~ 0.30
11 r 1 r
~~
(T)
l:l
0.25
lfl
I 0.20 ;.
l:l
lfl
O. 15
lfl
lfl
W
O. 10 ~
I
a:
I-
lfl
O. 05
> 0.00
w
0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
SAND COBBLES
GRAVEL
BOULDERS
F
100 I
90
80 j:
70~
w
60s:
50>-
I,() m H+f.I+I-H-LH4l-I-i-H-IH+-
2.5 0
30
60
90
120
150
LANE 2, n=4
~--~~--~~~~~~~O
30
60
90
120
150
LANE 3, n =6
~--~~~~~~-r.~~-.O
30
60
90
120
1194 150
WIDTH OF FILL
(em]
(1-
PROBLEM: 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5
00
t
3EI
4
I 2r I 6
z
8
lEvi
10
E; 00 12
z/r 14
MOOULUS OF 16
DEFORMATION : 18
Ap 20
EV= a. rAS
5. Concluding remarks
References
I. Introduction
(I)
T his phase of the settlement process is known as creep, and is essentiall y similar to
secondary compression in clays (where the mechanism ma y, however, be very differem).
The analysis of rockfill creep will not nonnaUy be a major consideration in dam design.
Generally a load-defonnation graph (or e v. log p) prepared from 24 hour selliements in a siage
load test will give adequa te pred ictions of selliements in situ. To this. a designer may choose
to add a nominal margin (say 5%) to allo w for creep. in order 10 ensure that Ihe cres\. fo r
example. ha~ ~urficicnt camber to maintain the requ ired freeboard. However, Ihe analysis of
creep becorno:~; muc h more imponant fo r the diagnostic analysis of settlement records. or in
situations when:: it is necessary to make long-tenn predictions of creep selliement. The success
I. The nature ofC" has ocen studied by Mesri and Godlewski ( 1977) who showed. for cohesive wits.
Ihill C~ is strongly depemlem on effective stress and thm the ratio C,)C, fall~ witllin fairly narrow
limits. It is. ho,,eveT. yet to be established whether such results also relate to cohesiOllless
materials. bill il is of inlcrest thatlhcy note thaI C" can change wilh lime and speculate on foctors
that mlly emtse this.
22J
E. Maran/Iil lias Neves (ed.). Adwmcts in Rockfill SlrUClure~ . 221-237.
C 199t Klu ...tr Academic P"bli~hers.
222
of such analysis then depends on an understanding of the fundamental nature of creep, and not
merely the application of conventional soil mechanics procedures.
Time, mins.
01r---,----,r-rr..,...,mlTOO.::......._.-..,-..,-.,-r-rnlOOO;:r::::::................,
I I I I I II II I I I I I I I I I
250 kPa
~
E
10F~~-------- __- ______~500~~kP~a~_
c
CI>
E
~ f-
a;
VI
2Fr-~~~~ON~----------------~10~0~0~k~p~a
3A MUDSTONE __
BLUE ROCK DAM
~d - 21 t/m 3
Since the origin of consolidation theory in the 1920's, settlement analysis has almost invariably
focussed on the settlement-time relationship, whether plotted to natural scales or some
convenient mathematical scale, as in the traditional methods of evaluating coefficient of
consolidation, Cv ' Recent work, however, has shown that a velocity-time graph, produced by
differencing raw settlement observations, is not only fully sufficient for the evaluation of
cv , but yields a significantly more accurate value through the elimination of irrelevant inputs
(Parkin, 1978; Parkin 1981).
This work forms the basis of the Velocity Method, whereby Cv is determined from the direct
overlay of a theoretical U-T solution on an experimental velocity-time graph (Fig. 2). In this
procedure, no geometrical constructions ale required because the settlement rate is everywhere
quite independent of initial conditions, and, over the matched region, also independent of
secondary consolidation. By contrast, traditional procedures (tw, etc) require a consolidation
state to be established in relation to initial and final states, both of which arc irrelevant and
neither of which can be established without ambiguity.
In the post-primary region, the settlement rate curve for a clay usually becomes linear (rather
than following the continuously curved theoretical solution) at a slope Cp which varies with
load. As indicated in Fig. 3, the decay rate, Cp, passes through a minimum for a load
increment straddling the pre-consolidation pressure, Pc (corresponding with the increase in C"
reponed by Mesri and Godlewski, 1977). The reason for this variation is not clear, but it may
relate to variations in the time of origin of creep. However, for coarse permeable materials
223
10r-----------,----------,---,
01
c:
E
"- ....
E
~
.::>
E
'"
" "
'"
.
a:
c: a: 001
.12
~\
"
"E
"!1 '"
E
~ 01
2.-""T/.
.!!
c:
0
u
U~ Q;
(/)
0001
such as rock fill , a primary region will not be observed and the settlement rate curve then
consists of a straight line with C~ = 1, creep commencing effectively at the instant of loading.
This value of C~ = 1 occurs for transient creep in a wide variety of materials, and appears
to be best expiai",;d in terms of the stochastic theory of Pusch and Feltham (1980), as the
altemative r81e process theory is limited to the prediction of steady-state creep rates only
(Mitchell et .11.. 1968). Because C~ is mostly ncar unity, it follows that the integral
relationship, plaited as settlement against log time, will also be in general (but not always)
linear, although with varying slope Ca- This, the traditional basis of creep analysis (as used
in procedures ~;uch as Poulos et a1. 1976), would be the simpler one to use, except for the fact
that C a is not casily defincd from laboratory tests 3 , and often exhibits erratic variations, as in
one case of reponed crecp settlements of somc major foundations on a mudstone (Mcigh, 1976:
Fig. 4). Factors which can contribute to such behaviour will be discussed subscquently. It
may be noted, however, that whereas C a is a material propeny derived from testing and
dependent on effective stress, C~ is essentially independent of any material propeny, except
as it occurs following consolidation.
2. The initial point on this graph is high because it includes clastic compression, and the subsequent
departures are the typical consequence of a sticking dial gauge. Note, however, that such
interpretations are not possible on the usual settlement-time graph.
3. Sowers et a!. (1965) repon values of ea from laboratory tests on rockfill that are generally about
half the field value.
224
r I
LOADING (k Pa)
o 25 (seating)
50
.100
0200
m 400
6800
10 100 1000
Time (mins)
1.8
I
Johnson 5t. Bridge
BH.201
rl
I
1.6 t Sample 271 gil C V
~
1.'
~
-- t-H-
:
~~-~<
' I I
/
1.2
a: I
..... ~
I
1.0
I
~
C
0.8 ~ 1\ i
I !
0.6
10
I It 100 1000
Pressure (kPa)
Rocklill creep can be studied in the laboratory in an oedometer test, wherein the load
application is quick so that the time of origin of creep, to' is clearly defined (consolidation
being insignificant). Should to be not known, as is often the case for field records or for creep
developing after consolidation, then the slope of the creep line on a velocity plot may not be
physically meaningfuL In addition, laboratory observations will usually be more consistent
than field measurements because of greater control and less disturbance from various sources.
For any load stage, a velocity diagram can be prepared by differencing the raw settlement
readings. Typical is a result for a soft siltstone rockfill from Sugarloaf Dam, Victoria (Fig. 5),
which shows firstly a slope that is close to -1, as it invariably seems to be, and secondly a
sudden discontinuity. Whilst the occurrence of such discontinuities is not predictable, it is
notable that the slope of the creep line is invariably preserved across them. Clearly, should
225
o
S!
.
c
E
~
:::0
~ ~ f----+-+-+--"4r+--W-/~
Discontinuities of various forms (of which Fig. 5 is one example) prove to be an intrinsic
feature of creep almost wherever it occurs. Similar effects have been observed on clays,
rockfills and soft rocks and described as "limited instabilities" by Bishop (1974), based on the
work of Bishop and Lovenbury (1969) and Pigeon (1969). In particular, Bishop noted that it
was not possible to eliminate these random features, even with the most meticulous care. Their
origin would appear to lie in the stick-slip nature of creep which distinguishes it from the
fundamental continuity of the consolidation mechanism: inherently, as load is transmitted
through a material, local stress concentrations develop, followed by yield, in diminishing steps.
In the case of Fig. 5, the discontinuity represents a locking-up of the system, which may relate
to the development of normal or shear stresses on the oedometer wall.
If the vclocity method is to be applied to the analysis of field settlement records, there arc
generally two problems. The first is that the time of origin of creep to may not be readily
identifiable, and the second is that field observations may contain an appreciable component
of scatter.
226
.0 1
I I
Random Fill
.005 ~ Sample No.3--
"'- p=1.94t1m'
~
-
.5 .001
E "\.
~
1!"
.0005
.0002
""'" "
t
o .0001
"-
~
.00005
.00002
~
50 100 200 500 1000 2000 5000
Time (minute.)
Fig. 5 Creep rate from ocdometer test, Sugarloaf siltstone (Parkin, 1985)
One possible means of estimating to is to plot the reciprocal of creep rate liS against time,
whereupon, if a sufficiently good line results, to can be read as the time intercept (Fig. 6). This
example relates to Cedar Cliff Dam, a sloping core rockfiIl dam in North Carolina for which
a settlement record (S v log t) is given by Sowers et aI. (1965)4. The accuracy with which
such creep rates can be calculated is limited by the accuracy with which a settlement graph can
be read, and it is clearly preferable to have access to original records for this purpose.
However, this analysis would suggest that to is rather later than middle of construction (April,
1952) as plotted by Sowers et aI., probably because of a significant contribution to creep
coming from the subsequent water loading on the acutcly-inclined core (the dam having filled
soon afler c(Jmpletion in August, 1952). With this value of to' the velocity plot becomes
closely linear at a gradient of -1, as is generally found to be the case.
Where th(']'( is a measure of scatter in field data, (as, for example, Fig. 4), that scatter will
be considerably amplitled on a derived velocity-time graph. It is important then to understand
that the velocity graph contains no additional error whatsoever and that the original data can
be recovered precisely by integration. Furthermore, whilst the extrapolation of a velocity line
for the prediction of creep settlement may on occasions seem imprecise, it will never he any
less accurate than any other method.
4. A description of Cedar Cliff Darn is given by Growden (1958), but docs not include the settlement
records quoted by Sowers ct aI. (1965).
227
On some occasions, it may be found that the scatter of data is of such magnitude as to make
the velocity plot of little value. Such scatter will tend to be biased below the mean creep line
because of the logarithmic scale, and may even include negative settlement rates. In such
circumstances, it may be found that a useful trend emerges if settlement rates are computed
over a double, or even triple time increment, at the penalty of some loss of sensitivity.
The value of a creep rate plot then depends on whether or not it is possible to identify and
isolate discontinuities. Some possible types of discontinuity are examined by Parkin (1971),
such as Fig. 7, from which it can be seen that, in the presence of a discontinuity, a
conventional settlement-time graph consists of two quite unrelated segments. Whilst these
segments might be clearly visible as drawn in Fig. 7, such curves normally have to be drawn
through plotted data incorporating varying degrees of scatter. There is then no way of fitting
an accurate mathematical funetion to the data that is in any way reliable for the prediction of
creep scttlemcnt. Normal practice in this case would be to fit a single continuous curve, which
must clearly be too steep, leading to an over-prediction of settlement.
150
A
V
50
V
~
V t o- 4
y"'"
.c-d
200 400 600 600 1000
lIS months I percent
...
1"-"-
0.03
0.02
:; i'-
c:
o
E
f',~
r--
'E 0.01
.
"~
~
'"'"
c.
-m 0.005
"
'OJ
a: ~
.
'"
_ 0.003
.
c:
E
.!! 0002 ~
\1 "-
'" "r--
,
m
10 20 30 50 100
(t tol months
Fig. 6 Dete mination of to' Cedar Cliff Dam, Parkin (1977) from data from Sowers et a!.
( 196:;\
228
Because the slope of a creep rate line is not a material property, but is unique to the
mechanism of creep (and the value of to)' the slope cannot change across a discontinuity, as
seen in Fig. 5. This may be quite important, as a discontinuity can occur at any stage and may
not always have an adequatc span of data following it to define a slope. Furthermore, the
scatter in thcse points will increase because they are derived from increasingly small
movements. Whilst it is rare to observe more than one discontinuity in any creep record, that
possibility aiways exists. However, unless the structure is approaching collapse, any
subsequent discontinuity will be of diminished magnitude because the creeping system is
always moving towards an optimal distribution of stress.
It is often unfortunate that the evaluation of dam settlement records is limited on account of
settlement observations not being commenced soon enough. This occurs because the
installation of crest settlement monuments is often delayed until all operations likely to interfere
with them have been completed. Whilst this is indeed important in respect of total settlements,
it is altogether irrelevant to readings of settlement rate, where loss or damagc to a reference
point is only of transient significance to the creep rate record. The importance of providing
temporary reference marks at an early stage should therefore not be overlooked.
t --+ log t
s
1 ""-
"
Fig. 7 Creep discontinuity caused by stress change (after Parkin, 197 I)
The velocity method has been applied to a number of rockfill dams under the control of the
Hydro-Electric Commission of Tasmania (HEC), in order to examine settlement rate behaviour
and what, if anything, can be deduced from it. These results, made possible only through
having access to original survey data 5 , have been presented previously by Parkin (1985), and
are reproduced here.
5. As indicated earlier, settlement-time graphs cannot normally be read with sufficient accuracy to
allow a meaningful velocity analysis to be made, unless settlements are large, as in the early
dumped rockfills.
229
Of the many structures with available data, five were selected for analysis, as listed in Table
1. In other C(ises, the time base was found to be too short, movements too small, or the
behaviour irregular for some reason, such as the leakage history at Scotts Peak Dam (Cole and
Fane, 1979). For each of these dams, settlement rate diagrams were prepared from precise
levelling records on crest marks in the vicinity of the maximum section.
In addition to settlement readings, settlement rate studies are also dependent on the chosen
time of origin for plotting. Arguments can be advanced for taking this at the mid-point of
construction or at the end-of-construction (E.O.C.), but all construction programmes differ and
even such dates as these can be difficult to pinpoint, in contrast with the laboratory situation.
In all the following graphs, E.O.C. of the fill has been used as the estimated time of origin, but
because of these uncertainties, the gradient of the creep line may not conform to -I in all cases.
For a time origin based on E.O.C., it would appear that crest settlement rates satisfactorily
conform to a straight line relationship, at a slope that is normally close to -1. This is best seen
in the result for Serpentine Dam (Fig. 8), wherein the embankment consists of rolled weathered
quartzite and schist, over some 8 m of in-situ river gravels (H.E.C., 1975). E.O.C. has been
taken as September 1971, when the embankment was complete except for a final l.2 m of
rockfill added after completion of the concrete facing. The significant features of this graph
are, firstly, that the application of water load during reservoir filling (which occupied a
considerable period because of the very large capacity) appears to have no effect on vertical
settlement, a characteristic that applies generally to faced rockfills, and, secondly, that the
scatter of points increases with time as the movements to be measured become very small.
"E
E
~
0
0:: 0'5
0.
CI>
~
U
02
Chainage 234
01
Wilmot Dam, of interest in being the first faced rockfill to be built by the H.E.C. (Cole,
1971), is ostensibly similar to Serpentine with respect to its creep behaviour (Fig. 9). In this
case. the rocUilI is a hard greywacke, placement of which was completed in November 1968.
Wilmot, however, is unique amongst this group of case studies in showing a gradient rather
steeper than -1, which suggests that the E.O.C. date may be inappropriate for some reason. A
closer scrutiny of operations in the 16 month period up to the commencement of crest
settlement readings shows that face construction took a further 10 months, during which a
settlement of lOmm was recorded from hydrostatic settlement gauges. Negligible settlement
occurred in the succeeding four months up to the commencement of filling, indicating
behaviour that is not at all consistent with the line drawn on Fig. 9. The indications are
therefore that a new phase of settlement has commenced during filling, and a time of origin
taken at this point does indeed lead to a line of slope -1.
05
""co -J1~
E
......
E
Storage
filling
S 02
III
"
tl:
a.
III
01
III
U 0.05
Choinoge 320
As compared with faced rockfills, cored dams show notable differences in their settlement
rate behaviour. A typical example is found in Parangana Dam (Mitchell et aI., 1968), where
the central core, containing the crest marks, consists of weathered granodiorite, supported by
rockfill shoulders of quartzite and schist. Based on the embankment E,O,C. at June, 1968, the
creep rates define a 45 line over the greater part of the time spanned, except for some higher
rates in the initial stages (Fig. 10). These are evidently attributable, as indicated, to reservoir
filling, with settlement associated with the penetration of a wetting front, and, dl a later stage,
to either a 5 month period of reservoir drawdown or (more probably) to road paving operations
on the crest. Such variations appear to be superimposed on an otherwise global trend for the
main body of the dam.
..,-CreSf p<:IVino
~
"- '\.
8E "-
"-
E
5
"
"..
05
n:
a.
l'
u
0'2
01
Choinoge 400
0'05
In yet other cases, the interpretation of settlement rate behaviour is made difficult by an
excessive level of scatter, which, in itself, must exist for some reason. Such is the case of
Rowallan Dam, a cored dam with a central concrete spillway, wherein the core consists of a
well-graded weathered till of quartzitic and dolcritic origin, and the rockfill shoulders arc of
quartzite and schist (Mitchell, et aI., 1968). For E.O.C. at January, 1967, the creep rate
behaviour at maximum section is as depicted in Fig. II. This shows a clear global trend, at
a slope ncar - I, "lith a substantial superimposed scatter, the magnitude of which is too great
to be explained by rounding errors in the surveyed levels. Filling was gradual, with the final
third occurring during months 7 and 8, where the creep rates reflect the passage of the wetting
front. A low rOini around month 23 may be connected with a reservoir drawdown caused by
pi ping problems (Mitchell ct aI., 1979), but the fluctuations around month 40 arc for reasons
not ascertainablc; by the Author. A correlation of creep rate against rainfall has also been
attempted and gives some grounds for regarding the scatter as a seasonal shrink-swell
phenomenon in the sometimes rather plastic core.
232
5
....--.-..
Storage filling
:c
co
E
"-
E 2
.
1"
o
a::
c.
0>
~ 0-5
u
02
Choinoge 1400
01L----L------~---L----~----~----~--~
As with Rowallan, Cethana Dam also shows substantial scatter in its creep rate behaviour
(Fig. 12), but still with a global trend at a gradient close to -1. This structure is a well rolled
quartzite fill, placement of which was essentially complete by November 1969, except for a
further II.5m added in October 1970 (adopted E.O.C.) after construction of the concrete face
(Fitzpatrick et aI., 1973). In this case, however, the crest level marks are located in the parapct
wall, so that recordings thereon are influenced by the movement of the facing slab. This is
reflected dramatically in the high settlement rates on first filling, rising to a peak of 20
mm/month (off scale) in April 1971, as the lake rose 30 m. This is clearly concrete shrinkage
in contact with stored water at a temperature typically around 6C. Thereafter, high and low
creep rates mostly correspond to a rise or fall in reservoir level during the corresponding time
interval, confilming the temperature influence, while the underlying rockfill continues to creep
independently, dominated by the final lift, and such that only a resolved component (COS2~) is
recorded on the parapet wall.
Some additional case histories of creep can be drawn [rom an investigation into the behaviour
of bored pilcs sockcted into weak rock, carried out by Williams (1980). In this investigation,
a series of test IJiles were constructed in a highly to moderately weathered siltstone from
essentially the same sequence as the rockfill of Fig. 5. The sites were located in a motorway
cut of some oim depth (S) and a brick pit excavated some 25m into rock (M), both near
Monash UniV(T;ity. These locations allowed the tests to be taken to failure and excavated
afterwards for .:xamination.
233
2
.;:
c:
0
E
"-
E
E
0'5
.. ~
II> Storage filling
0
0::
a.
II> Water level rising
~ 02
u Water level falling f
01
BLOCK H
005 L -_ _---'-_ _ _ _ _ _. L -_ _--'-_ _ _ _-L-_ _ _ _---L_ _ _ _- ' -_ _- - - '
Some of these tests were designed to operate in side friction only (with a collapsible base)
and some to operate in end bearing only, as documented by Williams. Loading was applied
in stages, generally of one hour duration, and increased up to failure, with sufficient
information available for the construction of velocity-time plots in many cases.
Results from two end bearing pile tests are shown in Fig. 13, both as raw plotted data and
with an interpretation superimposed. In the case of test M5, the loading is well below failure
for this location (F = 2.8), and the creep is of a routine character, following a 45 line. In the
case of test S4 (on a softer rock), some more complex behaviour is apparent, but a coherent
picture emerges if a 45" set square is used to construct segments of 45 lines, as on the right
of the figure. It is then apparent that there is a development from a stable creep at a load of
3000kN into a rapidly deteriorating condition at 4350kN, evidently with the successive
formation of cracks. In fact, some tilting of this pile commenced at 2550 kN, increasing
significantly at 3500 kN, and increasing further to 1 in 27 at the maximum load, at which point
the pile was deemed to have failed (load increment 3900 kN not ploned). Being a failure
situation with a potential for collapse, these successive slips do not show any tendency towards
diminishing magnitude.
A typical result for a side friction pile is shown in Fig. 14, again presented as both raw data
and with an interpretation superimposed. Load was increased at approximately 500 kN per
stage up to 4900 kN as plotted, where creep settlements became substantial. The load was
subsequently taken briefly to 5100 kN, but settlements were too great and the pile was deemed
to have failed. In this case also, a 45 set square can be used to fit segments of 45" lines, in
which a confusing set of points is seen to define a series of small and diminishing slips. Final
excavation showed that shearing had occurred generally through the roots of the deliberately
formed helical a:,perities (= 12mm depth) in the socket wall, creating a shear zone up to
100mm thick.
234
1.0
+
TeST S4 -
0; 1.00m - : = j :~ ::i
0 0 L fD ; 0
-
.- - _ .
0
0 02
0 0 8
a = 4350 kN +
0
orF'b
c: a = 3500 kN 0 0
E a; 3000 kN 0.'
-=
.. +
~ 0,2
'";;;
Q) 0 0
c: 0. '
il +
. .
0.02 - - "'-",------1, .,
~-.; + +++
U)
0." 0.001 : I ---------~.
.. ..
~-----------~
'0 20 '00
Time (mins)
7. Conclusions
The senlement rate method has been proposed as a means of monitoring and interpreting creep
settlements, with examples drawn from crest settlement observations on a number of rockfill
dams. It is shown that, provided an adequate time origin can be identified, the creep rates
generally follow a line of slope -Ion a log-log plot, subject to transient deviations that can be
identified and related to events in the construction and loading history. The reason that
interpretations are possible is that, as for consolidation, the effects of these events can be
viewed in isolation from all that precedes or follows. This is not the case when data is
examined in the conventional format of a settlement-log time graph, wherein much potentially
useful information can pass unnoticed. Thus the velocity plot has an important diagnostic
function for creep, as anticipated by Push and Feltham (1980),
Rate analysis may not always yield significant new information, and the results herein cover
a spectrum. Interpretations are in some cases conjectural, and in others information may not
be available or the behaviour may be too complex for interpretation. The potential of the
analYSis is, however, enhanced if data can be obtained early in the life of a structure, from
temporary marks if necessary, but normally Authorities prefer to delay the establishment of
permanent marks until construction activity has ceased. The fact that E.O.C. for a dam seems
to provide an appropriate time of origin for creep might suggest that overall creep settlements
235
1.0
0
- ~-;t-=b: :1-:::. I .
TESTS3
0 = 1m.
0.4
UD = 2.5
C I-+-+--t - f--t--- t- , - - Q=4900 kN
~... 0.2 ._-- . .-- r '
~'0 0"
I- +-+--+--HI--- -- --- -----.
*
0.' .::> ---------
, It') ('I
0.0'
2 10 20 40 100 200 400
Time (mins)
1.0
-'f,,.-t--I--t-t-- -I- - - -. --l- - J:.:1--
1"\ _- - r -
"<
_ . -- TeST S3
i' _ ___ D =1m.
0.'
.:
~... 0.2
__ ____ :- ['s~I~ -- -;::-'"
~
III
~~~ 0.. .. .. -
* I--t---+-I--Ir-_f- -:==::: =: "1":1: It,
'0
0.' - 1 i -1----1- - ------ -- ---.' '::., .- .
a::
c:
Q)
E
.,
Q)
E 0.04 1--+-1-+-+-' --- - - - - ---. - - - iJ - ..
III I--I--I--t-I-~'- --
0_02 :- - t --t---II--H- ' - - -- --.--- --- -. -_._ -
Ti me (m;ns)
Al'know)edgement
The analysis of dam settlements herein has been made possible by the kindness of the Hydro-
Electric Commission of Tasmania, in providing access to their records. Permission to publish
is gratefully acknowledged, but interpretations thereon are those of the Writer. In addition,
acknowledgement is made to the Rural Water Commission of Victoria for permission to publish
Fig. I and to the Melbourne and Metropolitan Board of Works for permission to publish Figs.
3 and 5. Appreciation is also expressed to Dr. A F. Williams for access to data from his
doctoral investigations.
References
Bishop, A W. (1974). The strength of crustal materials. Engineering Geology (Special Issue),
8:139-153.
Bishop, AW. and Lovenbury, H.T. (1969). Creep characteristics of two undisturbed clays.
Proceedings, 7th lnt. Conf. Soil Mech. and Found. Engg. (Mexico), 1:29-37.
Cole, B.A. (1971). Wilmot rocUill dam - Concrete face deflections. ANCOLD Bulletin, No.
33, 19-26.
Cole, B.A and Fone, P.J.E. (1979). Repair of Scotts Peak Dam, Tasmania. 13th Congr. Int.
Comm. Large Dams (New Delhi), 2: 211-23l.
Fitzpatrick, M.D., Liggins, T.B., Lack, L.S. and Knoop, B.P. (1973). Instrumentation and
performance of Cethana Dam. 11th Congr. Int. Comm. Large Dams (Madrid), 3: 145-164.
Growdon, J.P. (1958). Rockfill dams with sloping clay cores. Proceedings, ASCE, v. 84, no.
P04, Papcr 1743. See also: Rockfill dams: Performance of seven sloping core dams, Papcr
1744.
Hydro-Electric Commission of Tasmania (1975). Gordon River Power Developmcnt (Part II).
ANCOLD Bulletin, No. 41, 22-26.
Meigh, A.C. (1976). The triassic rocks, with particular reference to predicted and observed
performance of somc major foundations. Sixteenth Rankine Lecture. Geotechnique, 26:3,
pp 391-452.
Mesri, G. and Godlewski, P.M. (1977). Time-and Stress-Compressibility Interrelationship.
Procccdings, ASCE, v. 103, no. GT5, pp. 417-430 (Paper 12910).
Mitchell, W.R., Fidler, J. and Fitzpatrick, M.D. (1968). Rowallan and Parangana rockfill dams.
J. 111st. Engrs. Australia, 40: 239-249.
Mitchell, J.K., Campanella, R.G. and Singh, A (1968). Soil creep as a rate process.
Proceedings, ASCE v. 94 no. SM1, 231-253, Paper 575l.
Mitchell, W.R. alJd Fitzpatrick, M.D. (1979). An incident at Rowallan Dam. 13th Congr lnt.
Comm. Large Dams (New Delhi) 2: 195-210.
Parkin, AK. (1971). Application of rate analysis to some settlement problems involving creep.
Proceedings. 1st Australia-New Zealand Conf. on Geomechanics (Melbourne), I: 138-143.
Parkin, A.K. (1977). The compression of rockfill. Australian Geomech. J., G7 pp 33-39.
Parkin, A.K. (1978). Coefficient of consolidation by the velocity method. Geotechnique 28:4:
472-474.
Parkin, AK. (1981). Consolidation analysis by the velocity method. Proceedings, lOth Inl.
COI1f. Soil Mcch. and Found. Engg. (Stockholm), 4 : 723-726.
237
Parkin, A.K. (1983). Strength and compressibility of rocklill. Blue Rock Dam Project, Tanjil
River. RepOlt to State Rivers and Water Supply Commission of Victoria, No. 83/1, Dept. of
Civil Eng., Monash University.
Parkin, A.K. (1985). Settlement rate behaviour of some fill dams in Australia. Proceedings,
11th Inl. Conf. Soil Mech. and Found. Engg. (San Francisco), 4 : 2007-2010.
Pigeon, Y. (1969). The compressibility of rocklill. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.
Poulos, H.G., de Ambrosis, L.P. and Davis, E.H. (1976). Method of calculating long-tenn
creep settlements. Proceedings, ASCE, v. 102, no. GT7 pp 787-804, Paper 12273.
Pusch, R. and Fe1tham, P. (1980). A stochastic model for the creep of soils. Geotechnique,
30:4, pp 497-506.
Sowers, G.F., Williams, R.C. and Wallace, T.S. (1965). Compressibility of broken rock and
the settlement of rockfills. Proceedings, 6th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. and Found. Engg., (Paris),
1:335-340.
Wahls, H.E. (1962). Analysis of primary and secondary consolidation. Proceedings, ASCE,
vol. 88 no. SM6, pp 207-231, Paper 3373.
Williams, A.F. (1980). The design and performance of piles socketed into weak rock. Ph.D.
Thesis, Monash University, Australia
See also: Williams, A.F. (1980). Proceedings, 3rd Australia - New Zealand Conf. on
Geomechanics (Wellington), 1:87-94.
See also: Williams, A.F., Johnston, LW. and Donald, LB. (1980). Proceedings, Int. Conf.
Struct. Foundations on Rock (Sydney), 1: 327-347.
CH APTE R 10
FILTERS AND DRAINS
j . BRAUNS
1. I n tro duc ti o n
~ ..::.
~77
DRAIN
?// 777
mass fracti Ie
05 15 50 85 100
TERZAGHI/PECK (1948)
2.4 (l(X)se)
SICHARDT (1952) 6.5 (dense)
KARPOFF (1955) 12 - 40
o " 5 - 10 (unif F)
'we1 grade:
(USBR) o - 12 - 58 I B, F
ZWECK/DAVIDENKOFF
4 .: 5 - 10 (unif B)
(1956)
ZWECK (1959)
FIL T E R . BASE
F~-- sIze f a c t o r - ,
SIL T SAND
medium coarse fine me<lium coor~
III
20 I
'"'"
"0
;,- 15
"'<'VAUGHAN and
SOARES
EROSIONS--
"0 ~
~, I
10 ... /,SHERARD etal
r-- --- - - - - ... ... ...
t---. -.
--
-.
-.
5 ~ FILTRATION
1 I
0,006 0.D2 0,06 0,2 0,6 2
d858lmml
OF BASE MATERIAL
m 60
C)
'" I I
-
EROSION C U' B=10), ~7/-'/
"0
50 /"/;;-- ,,""2
"-
C)
..-:;.--
..-:::::-<1;~7____
7
--(1
'"
y -::::::~ ___
"0
40 ZlEM5 / __ --
.J;.~ __
; / --
/ / .........
;//,;--::y"/
-------'//
30
;/
I
1:%
FILTRATIONI
20
yY" 7 THANIKACHALAM and 5AKTHIVAOIVEL.
// d50 F Id50 a =2,4'C U,F-8
1O
OL-~~--~--~--~--~~~~--~---
1 2 6 10 12 14 16 18 20
COEFF OF UNIFORMITY OF FILTER CU,F
SAND GRAVEL
~----,-----,-----~----'------r----~~OB
m c m c
1- 100
I
<.:>
w 85
3: 80
>-
m
0::
w 60
z
LL i
I I
";f.
1.0
20
15
85
'+--+l---t-1IR DISc
DasF
g,Lo,--~~----~~~~~---'I~,O----------~10
o em 10 20 30 40 50 60
tr--
~
0 f m c f m c
w 100 1
~ ~>"
>- 85 --+-- -
co 80 BAND OF - k~ ~ 1-- l- f--
cr
w
z
LL
OFBA'j I~f\~-
GRADATIONS~
60 SOIL v(")
I;j
11
::) :..- BORDER - LI NE
FOR
l
ALLOWABLE FILTER f--
;;e L\'" GRADATIONS I--
~
~O ~ t-- r'
~ }
I
-
V
20 -
15 -- I-
I
- /--< l- f- - -- . -'- --
1 II
----, '--
o ~
006 01 0.2
I 0.6 to I 2 6 10 20 60 100
RELEVANT d85 S d15 F
GRAIN SIZE d [mm]
~VB
dVF
10 1b 20 2b 30 3b
i- \\
I CRIT
:
I-
14
~ 1\ I
I
jII CRIT= 0, 66 +
I-
z
lJj 12 6
I d10 2 A50 2
0
<
\
\J
0:: 10 ---- --I
\
lC>
t
U
mSu
::; 6 ------1I
=>
<
0::--'
0<
I
I
g Su \ I,
>-- 6
i\
--
:r:ffi fS \ , , * ' O S = 0,02 mm
I-
--'< 4 1\
<::E -.....
u
-lJj Il~10s=O,~m~1Os =O,06mm I'-..
~~l~dlOs.:,E,6mm l-
~Ul I--
0::< 2 I
urn
0 I I j
0 4 [10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90 10 o
d10S=2mm A 50 = d 50 f
d SOB
iF erot dwF = 5 mm
0.6 r---;========;-------:T--,
Frc~t =0.65 =const.
l.e = 26.5 kN 1m 3
0.5 nF = O. 39
0.3
10
0.2 12.5
15
17.5
20
0.1 25
o~~~~=-~~~~
o 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
[mml d50s
Figure 12. Hydraulic criterion for flow along an unstable
base/filter interface (after Brauns 1985)
As can be seen in figure 12, very low hydraulic gradients
are critical, if the "filter" is coarse and the base
material is fine. This can easily be understood, if we
regard the high flow velocities in the pore system of coarse
materials on the one hand, and the low critical drag forces
required to move fine particles (base soil), on the other.
Please note, that in both figures, 11 and 12, critical
gradients are presented, which do not include any safety
factor as do the geometric filter criteria discussed
earlier.
At the end of this section concerning the present practice
of filter design, it should be emphasized that the diagrams
in figure 11 und 12 are only given here to draw the readers
attention to quantitative relations, which govern the risk
of erosion, if percolation of unstable soil combinations
cannot be prevented. These diagrams should not be understood
as design diagrams.
252
PROBABILITY OF PROBABILITY OF
FAILURE Pt = 100". FAILURE Pt= 0
o /1
- 60 -+---- ---,(''---
E,
a~ 40 + ___
I
----/-c--+_ _~--_-----j
I
2Df-----t---c,,?-;---+----+---
m
dID d30 d60 d90 d-
?6~.
~,~q ~'
.::1_
"0 ..
.. '
c;~~~;:: ::.~~,. ;~
:~.:?,:;, 'e S?
SCREEN WITH d 30 d 60 d 90 LOST MASS
MESH SIZE
EQUAL TO '.:.~.o.: OF BASE MAT'ERIAL
~. :... ~~ ?~j~): "_9,
DISTRIBUTION OF MAX
PORE CONSTRICTIONS
I N, ~ NUMBER OF CONSTRICTIONS
ALONG FLOW PATH I
A- ___ ~ __ ~ __ ,
1.0
0
85%
Ul
UJ 0.8
'"
;".
z
UJ
u 0.6
a:
UJ
"-
LL
0
0.4
::E
:::>
Ul
31. 5 63
40 6Ci 80 100
0.155 do dl00
DIAME TER d [mm I
BASE FILTER
ORIGINAL
INTERFACE
~~
ry
Goa
80r------------------------"
60 lesl s analysIs
.
l 0~~~~B~S====~gO====~9~5----~IOO
QB "' {d~ I I % I
r
1.... .~ ~~. B!!E .. :' . ":.". INm.
bQse moss losl
penelralian L . : .. : ... +-;-:;+-;-;:'" FACE
depth If
.. ..=....-.:
..-.~ ...
. ...-.-:-.. . ..
. .:.-.-.
1000,------------------------;.--,
anolysls
~I~ BOO Irsls
600
4 00
3 JO
200
. '.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. -
85 90 95 100
Ce,m {d~ J I'!,}
SUM OF PERCENTAGES Q
10~------------~----------~'--T--,
08
06
05
04
02
31 5 63
1 2 I 4 6 8 20 40 60 80 100
EFFECTIVE FILTER SIZE: dt:r;:n dk
DIAMETER d [mml
50 40
If) d 85:
z $.
0 IN =1281 !.I(dIS} =57.94"",
t= 40
30 t; (deS) = 9.37mm
~ V(d8S} = 16.2'.
Z
II:: W
l:ll 30 :::l
d 15
In
0 20 ~
II::
~ 20 U.
II::
W 10
~ 10
:::l
Z
0
0.5 2 4 8 16 315 63 100
d15,d85 [mml
100
~
>-
III
~ 50
-30
-10
5
o
0.06 0.2 0.6 2 6 20 60
GRAIN SIZE d [mm J
CU , F
( 3 3 , ~ 6 CU ,F 6
CU. f
100~~---+--~m~~--~r-~~--4-~~--h-~~
95
>-
i~
w
~
>-
tIl
50
-30
-10
5
O~ ____L-__ ~-L~~L- __ ~ ______L-__ ~
0.06 02 06 2 6 20 60
GRAIN SIZE d [mm J
4. Drains
In the introduction to this contribution, we have tried to
separate properly the filter function from the drainage
function of design elements in dams. Up to now we have dealt
with the filtration aspect. This closing chapter will deal a
little with drainage layers and their drainage capacity.
For obvious reasons drainage layers are normally made of
pervious material, sometimes of clean gravel or even crushed
sound rock. In rockfill dams, the rockfill itself acts as
the drainage zone.
HOMOGENEOUS DAM.
ZONED DAM.
KOZENY-CASAGRANDE DUPUIT
hor=V2~+(L)2
kOr /<Or
:0 V2 ~
kDr
~ NEGLIGI BLE
SAND GRAVEL
FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE MEDIUM COARSE
"" 0, 2'~
~; CRIT
(d [mm] I w
w
u
---' 10-1
::J
<t
0::
o
VALID NOT VALID
~~
>-
I
10- 3 ~
0,06 1 0,2 3 50,6 1 2 3 5 6 20 3 560
EFFECTIVE GRAIN DIAMETER dw[mm]
0.05
~3 d w 020. 52mm l
52
0.04 b 00014-
. cm 2
10 0 0.361
0.03
0.02 n =0,3B
x 0 0 0.36
+ 0 0 0.36
0.01
0 0 0.006 c~
0L--'~0.~5~-1~.0~-~1.~5--~2.~0-~2~.5~-"3.~0--~3.5
V [em Is 1
10(. I
10'
10 -) 1 ,l.--,L------!--"--!---;------!---!----;-,-:-,-;--'7,---;, d..., !m J
101. ":0' 10
01 10C 1000d w imm]
-
FACTOR OF REDUCTION K
1.0.
r--
K
I
ID.6mm
-- -
0.8
--
- k - 1+v'1+C'I-d w3 '1
AD
0.6 f
0.1.
,\~ r--
JD-
-.............
0.2 ~
...........
r--
-........: ::::- r 10.0 r8D r6.D
0. 7 8 9 10.
0. 2 3 I. 5 6
(C'xD.2 mm- 3 ) HYDRAULIC GRADIENT
Filters
Do not confuse filter and drainage functions in dams.
Keep the problem of autostability of base, filter and
drain materials in mind.
Apply filter rules to the safe border lines of gradation
bands.
Do not forget to provide enough filter thickness, this
with respect to the coarseness of the material in
question.
Collect data on the statistical scattering of gradations
of dam materials as a basis for further development of
statistical filter concepts and publish such data.
Try to apply statistical filter concepts and report on
experience.
Drains
Make a rational design of a drain with regard to its
capacity.
Do not forget restrictions regarding drain materials in
connection with their permeability.
References
1. Introduction
Siress-sirai n laws for soil appear to have been developed with restrictions on their
applicability. if any, relating to whether the soil is cohesive or no n-cohesive rather
than whether it is insitu o r a fill . The same models have been used for both, only
the parameters are different. T his is not completely true. For example, a dedicated
model is used for insitu London clay, and late r in this chapler it will be noted that a
difficulty in app lying the critica l state model to fills is that it was o ri ginally developed
(or laboratory re-consliluled clays (Le . depositied in wate r) , Nonetheless, the
formulation of the basic models is not affected by this d istinction. Consequently much
o f the content of th is c hapter applies to insitu soils as well as to fills.
A stess-strain or consrirulille law can relate either the accumulated or the
inc remental stress to the corresponding strains. This can be ell pressed by:
(I )
'69
E. ManltlM diJs NtYes (td.). AdwltlUJ il1 Roclcfil/ Slruc/lU"eJ. 269-290.
C 1991 KIIlWf'TAcadtmicPublisMr$.
270
The simplest form of the 12. matrix is linear elastic isotropic. Two elastic
parameters (e.g. Young's modulus, E, and Poisson's ratio, v, or bulk modulus, K, and
shear modulus, G) fully define the matrix. The 'transversely isotropic' linear elastic
assumption is the next stage up in sophistication. This features a vertical stiffness
different from the horizontal. Five elastic parameters are required. These elastic
models are well known and are not considered further here. (See, however, Section
8.1 of Chapter 12 for a convenient form of the isotropic elastic plane strain 12.
matrix.) Suffice it to note that it is good practice to precede a non-linear finite
element analysis by a linear one to get an idea of the results to be expected.
A stress-strain law should ideally incorporate the following characteristics of fill
materials:
(1) The increase in bulk stiffness which occurs with increasing stress level (i.e.
the concave form of an isotropic compression or oedometer stress-strain
curve(i.
(2) The reduction in shear stiffness which occurs with increasing deviator stress
(Le. the convex form of the triaxial test deviator stress-strain curve).
(3) A Mohr-Coulomb or similar type of failure criterion. This implies that an
incremental shear modulus tends to zero as the failure stress state is
approached.
(4) A higher stiffness on unloading.
(5) A higher stiffness at low stress levels (the threshold effect) and on
reloading following unloading.
(6) The effects of dilatancy, Le. the tendency of a stiff soil such as a well
compacted granular fill to increase its volume on shearing, or of a soft
clay fill to reduce its volume on shearing. Such a clay would be
negatively dilatant.
(7) Collapse settlement, i.e. the reduction in volume of initially unsaturated
material when saturated. This particular applies to rockfills.
The last of these should be considered separate from the rest. As is explained in
Chapter 12, Section 12 it can be catered for by providing a separate set of
parameters for whatever model is being used.
The models to be described here divide into variable elastic (Sections 2 and 3
below) and elasto-plastic models of which only the critical state model is considered
here (in Section 4). The former can incorporate characteristics (1), (2) and (3) and
to some extent (5) but not (6). (4) can be incorporated only by a 'user decision' on
what constitutes unloading and the alteration of the stiffness parameters for the region
in which this occurs. Elasto-plastic models of the critical state type can in principle
incorporate all of characteristics (1) to (6). How well they do it is, however, another
question!
All the models are in incremental form so that D in Equation (1) indicates a
relatively small increment. The 12. matrix is then 'incremental' or 'tangential'.
Following the formulation of each constitutive law an indication is given of how its
parameters can be determined. Also examples are included which give some idea of
their magnitude. Finally comments are made on the validity of the models.
(i) This is not always concave with rockfills. It may be convex due to a crushing
of particle contacts at higher stress levels.
271
These two models are appropriately described together as they have both been used in
a single analysis. This was done in the predictive analysts of the Beliche dam in
south-east Portugal by LNEC(i) (Naylor et ai, 1986). Each model represents different
parts of the dam.
The hyperbolic model is the best known of the early non-linear stress-strain laws
used in finite element analyses. It is attributed to Kondner (1963) who proposed that
the deviator stress-axial strain curve from triaxial tests should be approximated by the
hyperbola
f 1
(2)
in which a and b are constants for a particular test but in general will vary with the
cell pressure IJ 3. Duncan and Chang (1970) developed it into a full constitutive law
the formulation of which is given below. The generalised model involves at least
eight material parameters (nine if unloading is included).
The Ec-Ko model was developed at LNEC specifically for use in the central parts
of fills where conditions are approximately laterally constrained, i.e. they approximate
the 'Ko' condition. 'Ec' is the name of the constrained modulus. The model
involves a minimum of four parameters (seven if unloading is included).
where
Rf (IJ 1 - IJ 3) (1 - sin 'P)
(3)
2IJ 3 sin 'P + 2c cos 'P
In this Pa is the atmospheric pressure, c and 'P are the Mohr-Coulomb strength
parameters, Rf is a reduction factor which reduces the f 1 = 00 asymptote of a- l-a- 3 to
the assumed deviatoric stress at failure, and K and n are constants to be determined
experimentally.
Poisson's ratio is defined by a separate hyperbolic relationship between the axial
and radial strain for the shear stage of the triaxial test of the form
E 3
E 1 (4)
F + DE3
Differentiation of this leads to the following expression for the tangential Poisson's
ratio
(5)
X is the same expression as in Equation (3), and G, F and D are further parameters
to be determined experimentally.
So far eight parameters have been defined to which values must be assigned: K, c,
'P, Rf, n, G, F and D. (This excludes Pa which will be assigned a nominal
atmospheric pressure in appropriate units, e.g. 100 kPa). If a stiffer response on
unloading is to be incorporated an increased value of K, namely KUf' must be
assigned.
A variation on the above formulation suited to fills with a curved Mohr-Coulomb
failure envelope is to set c=O and let 'P vary according to
0"
'P = 'Po - d'P Log ( ~ ) (6)
Explicit expressions for the vertical constrained tangential modulus Ec and the
horizontal-to-vertical stress ratio Ko for conditions of no lateral strain are defined.
These constitute elastic tangential moduli and can be used to define E t and Pt.
(Equations (to) and (11) below.) The formulation is due to Veiga Pinto (1983).
The following relation between vertical stress and strain in the one-dimensional test
is assumed
(7)
dO",
(8)
df,
Ko = Ao + B ~ (9)
o Pa
K t = ~ = Ao + 2Bo ~ (10)
o dO", Pa
273
The tangential Poisson's ratio and Young's modulus are obtained in terms of Ec
and Kot from elastic theory as
(11 )
1 + Ko t
(12)
The four parameters Ae, Be' Ao and Do cover loading. If there is unloading then
an additional three parameters are required. These comprise Co and Do to replace
Ao and Bo in (9) and (10) and thus define an unloading Ko ' and Ce to replace Ae
in 7 on the basis that Be = 1 for unloading. Thus Ec is replaced by the constant
CePa for unloading.
The hyperbolic model parameters are normally obtained from consolidated drained
triaxial tests. A set of these are required at different cell pressures as would be done
to define a failure envelope. The Ec-Ko model parameters are obtained from
no-Iateral-strain compression tests in which the lateral stress (J 3 is measured.
The parameters are obtained by fitting the appropriate equations to the
experimental stress-strain curves. Details of this for the hyperbolic model are given
by Duncan and Chang (1970). For the Ec-Ko model a (J 1 : f 1 plot will yield the
parameters Ae,B e of Equation (7). A Ko = (J /(J 1:a- 1 plot is required to obtain Ao
and Bo '
As an example of the parameter values appropriate for an embankment dam the
core and inner shell values for the Beliche dam analyses described by Naylor et al
(1986) are reproduced in Table 1. In these analyses the Ec-Ko model was used for
the core and foundation and the hyperbolic model for the rest of the dam.
Zone Ae Be Ao Bo
3. K -G Model
3.1 BACKGROUND
The idea behind this model is that it should incorporate as a first priority
characteristics (1) and (2) above. With an isotropic elastic formulation this implies
that the incremental, or tangential, bulk modulus, K, should increase with increasing
mean stress, and the shear modulus decrease with increasing deviator stress. It also
incorporates a yield criterion (characteristic (3)).
The model was conceived as an alternative to the hyperbolic model as it was felt
that in view of the limitations of variable elastic models it was inappropriate that as
many as eight or nine parameters should be required. Could not nearly as good
results be obtained with five parameters?
3.2 FORMULATION
The basic model may be defined in either of two ways. The first, referred to as the
(Tm,(Tq K-G model defines K and G in terms of the stress invariants (Tm and (Tq
where
(Tm (13 )
(14)
and the second, the (Ts,(Td K-G model, defines K and G in terms of the stress
invariants (Ts and (Td where
In these z is the out-of-plane direction. For plane strain applications (for which the
(Ts,(Td model is particularly appropriate) it is convenient to use K = K + 1/3G since
this defines the slope of the (Ts:volumetric strain curve for plane strain (as does K the
(Tm:volumetric strain in general). The definitions are as follows:
K Kl + O'KlTs (19)
In these the five parameters (K,m, ... ,I3G m or K" ... ,I3G) are material constants. I3G
is negative. The superposed m is used to distinguish the (f m.(f model from the
other. No tag is put on the (fs,(fd parameters as these are most ~requently referred
to in what follows.
For unloading higher values of these parameters are required. A simple assumption
is to increase all five parameters by a single factor (typically in the region of four
times). This implies that Poisson's ratio is the same in unloading as in loading.
The (fs,O"d version is particularly appropriate if it is assumed that the soil obeys a
Mohr--coulomb criterion. This criterion is incorporated in this version of the model
as will now be demonstrated. At yield the tangential shear modulus G becomes zero.
Setting G=O in Equation (20) and rearranging gives
(21)
(22)
K, m and Cl'J(m may be determined directly from an isotropic consolidation test. The
slope of the O"m: (v (v = volumetric strain) curve is K. and this may be plotted
against O"m. The best straight line fit will define K,m and Cl'J(m.
The shear modulus parameters may be found by noting that Equations (18) and
(20) define a plane in respectively a G,O"m'O"q space and a G.O"s.O"d space. The line
formed by the intersection of this plane and the G=O plane identifies a failure
condition, i.e. Mohr--coulomb for O"s,O"d version and a Drucker-Prager type for the
O"m,a q version. Parameters G,m, O'(}m, I3G m or G" aG, I3G may therefore be
determined by plotting the results of conventional triaxial tests as points in a G ,0" m,a q
or a G,as.ad space respectively and finding the plane which gives a best fit to these
points.
An example of this plane fitting procedure is illustrated in Figure 1. This is based
on three consolidated drained triaxial tests on a boulder clay which was used for the
core in an embankment dam. The spot values on the inclined lines are the G values
obtained by careful measurement of the slope of the stress strain curves (i). The best
fit surface is indicated by the G-O, 10 and 20 MPa contours. This surface has the
(i) These relate O"d to (d where (d = (,-1/3(v. The slope of this curve is 3G.
276
equation
whence G 1 = 500 kPa, 0'(} = 27, {3G = -27. Equations (23) and (24) show that
these values imply that <p = 30' and c = 21 kPa.
The K-G model stress strain curves corresponding to the three tests can then be
calculated using Equation (20). They are compared with the laboratory curves in
Figure 2. The (fd:fd curves agree remarkably well. A weakness of the model,
however, is revealed in the fV: Ed curves. It underestimates the compressive
volumetric strain. It cannot incorporate the negative dilatancy of this soil (i.e.
characteristic (6) above).
It is somewhat time consuming to carry out the plane fitting procedure. An
alternative is to decide on c and <p and then select the three parameters so that
Equations (23) and (24) are satisfied. This leaves one independent parameter which
can be selected to give the right shear stiffness, the strength requirements having first
been satisfied.
Oedometer tests may also be used to assist in determining the five K-G
parameters. This, however, is more difficult as it is not possible to write an explicit
equation relating (f 1 to E 1 for the no-lateral-strain case. This can only be obtained
by an incremental analysis. Also it involves all five parameters. However, if the
three shear modulus parameters have already been determined then by a trial and
error process oedometer test results can be used to select values of the two bulk
modulus parameters (K 1m, CXJ(m or 1<1' a).
The K-G parameters used for the core and inner shell in the Beliche dam
prediction analyses are given in Table 2. The 'prediction' (P) values correspond to
the hyperbolic-Ec-Ka model parameters of Table 1. The resulting settlement profiles
are compared in Figure 23 of Chapter 12. Two other sets of K-G model parameters
are included in Table 2. These were used in a subsequent back analysis of the
Beliche dam which attempted to reproduce the measured settlements of the dam.
Settlement profiles from these are reproduced in Figures 24 and 25 of Chapter 12.
The 'dry' parameters relate to the fill as constructed and the 'wet' to it after it had
become saturated during impounding. (This applied to the upstream shell only.)
These two sets were used to model collapse settlement. Triaxial and one-dimensional
stress-strain curves obtained from these parameters for the inner shell are compared
both with critical state model curves and experimental in Figure 7 below.
The large differences between the parameters of Table 2 for the inner shell
material are noted. This is due partly to the fact that the material did not fit the
model very well. A good fit to both triaxial data and one-dimensional tests could
not be obtained. There was, therefore, an element of subjectivity in selecting the
parameters. Another factor was the variability of the material. It was difficult to
know how representative were the tested samples. The prediction parameters
overestimated the stiffness, thus all the parameters (except K 1) have been considerably
reduced for the later analyses. Note, however, that the strength is little altered.
The changes to the core parameters (and also those for the outer shell which are not
presented here) were much less drastic.
277
...
E
z 500
.:x:
o L---~-----L~----~------~---------L--__ aS
o 500 1000
kN/m2
Contours are of best fit surface
Spot values are G in MN 1m2
Figure 1. K-G model fit to triaxial test shear modulus values (after Naylor et ai,
1983)
o
~
........::
0'] =
----
520 kPa
O'd #
kPa
Legend
500 500
Experimental----
K-G-model - - -
10
o O~~~L-L-L---_-----~I--~~
G (26)
4.1 BACKGROUND
This model originated from work done at Cambridge University, England, in the 1950s
and 60s under the leadership of Professor Roscoe. His objective was to develop a
theoretical framework which incorporated the essential characteristics of, at least, clay
soils. The model is more than just a stress:strain law. It has become a philosophy
providing a means of communicating ideas and of teaching soil mechanics. Atkinson
(1983) elevates it to the status of a paradigm(i).
The model unifies the previously unconnected concepts of shear strength and soil
deformation properties. It brings together the accepted concepts of critical state (or
critical voids ratio), voids ratio :Log. of stress relations for clay soils, irreversibility of
displacement on unloading, and the Mohr-Coulomb and Hvorslev strength criteria.
There is not space here to enlarge on this and the interested reader is referred to
the original text by Schofield and Wroth (1968) (unfortunately now out of print), the
texts by Atkinson and Bransby (1978) or Britto and Gunn (1987), or Chapter 7 of
Naylor et at (1983).
The model can be viewed as a form of strain hardening plasticity. In contrast to
metal plasticity where strain hardening (if any) is related to deviatoric plastic strains
(Le. irrecoverable distortion) the strain hardening in the critical state model is related
to volumetric plastic strain. The formulation given here is on the same lines as for
conventional elasto-plasticity with this principal difference.
The suitability of the critical state model for fills must be questioned. It
incorporates the properties of clay soils, in particular the one to one relationship
between voids ratio and effective stress of a clay soil as it is consolidated from a
slurry. A relationship of this sort will have some validity for a soft clay fill but little
for rock or sand-gravel fills. Nonetheless other characteristics incorporated in this
model are present in fills, and it does seem that it can provide a better
representation of at least some fills than the variable elastic models. This particularly
applies when effective stress unloading applies, as in the impounding behind both
central core and upstream membrane dams.
There are many possible variations on matters of relative detail in the formulation.
Some of these may be important in particular applications. Certain of these
variations will be considered after the basic model has been described.
The formulation given here features the following
(1) The yield function is described in terms of the 'plane strain' stress invariants ITs
and lTd. This means that the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion is a natural part of
the formulation. (The yield surface takes the angular form in principal stress
space shown in Figure 3.)
(2) Linear elasticity is assumed within the yield surface.
The original formulation differed on both these points. The yield function was
prescribed in terms of 'p and q' (ITm and IT , respectively in the present notation).
Also variable elasticity was prescribed. A furt%er, more detailed difference is the use
here of a parameter X to describe the plastic bulk compressibility. This represents a
simplification of the conventional formulation.
(i) This word is used in a different sense to that given in some dictionaries. It
implies something bigger than a theory - a framework of ideas within which
theories can be developed. It is essentially open ended.
280
The first part of this is quite general and applies to any form of strain hardening
plasticity. Let
F(![,h) =0 (27)
Q(Q:,h) =0 (28)
define a plastic potential. The gradient of Q defines the flow rule vector !!q, i.e.
aQ (29)
~q
Oil
Also define
=
aF (30)
~f
Oil
For associative plasticity Q=F (and !!f=~=!!). For generality it is assumed that Q
and F differ and then later for certain conditions they can be equated.
The flow rule is used to inter-relate the components of plastic strain increments(i)
according to
(31 )
(33)
Noting that d.fe ~ -ld![ where ~ is the elastic modulus matrix, and introducing
(31), gives
(34)
1
d>- = -
(3 -afTD dE
-e- (35)
in which (3 =H + !!(T~!!q
1
d![ = ~ed.f - ~ (~e~q)(~fT~e)d.f
Noting that ~fT~ = (~~f)T one obtains
with
1
~ep = ~e - .Qq.QfT (37)
~
in which !?q = ~!!q
and !?t = ~~f
282
Origin of
stress--~
axes
o
o "'-~:::-_-+--_ _ _---L_"O" s
I. 0"( .1
(b)
h
D~---~-~
o~--~--~------~~
LnO" s
(a)
Equations (36) and (37) define the constitutive law for elasto-plastic models in
general. There is one further step of general validity to take before it is necessary
to consider the special conditions of the critical state model. This is the formulation
of the consistency rule.
The consistency rule is obtained by differentiating Equation (27) and setting the
differential to zero, i.e.
dF(~,h) = ~.~ +
aF aF
Oil.ah = 0
aF
Hd)" + Oil dh = 0 (38)
Equation (38) is a mathematical statement that the stress point sticks to the current
yield surface during yielding noting that this yield surface is itself changing in size on
account of the variation of h.
It is appropriate now to introduce some of the jargon of critical state soil
mechanics. The terms 'state boundary surface' (s.b.s) is used to define the set of
yield surfaces of Equation (27). This is illustrated in Figure 5 as a surface in a
i'Ts,i'Td,h space. Its intersection by a h = constant plane defines the yield surface (a
line in this representation) for that particular h. This is referred to as an 'elastic
wall'. Conventionally the s. b.s. is represented in a space with the axis h replaced by
the voids ratio, e. (The relation between hand e need not concern us here. It is
not one to one since e contains elastic as well as plastic components.)
h is defined as the volumetric plastic strain, i.e. h = fxP + fyP + f zP. Using
Equation (31)
(39a)
dh = d>- aQ (39b)
00s
Substituting (39) into (38) and dividing through by d).. gives, generally
H
aF (40a)
-Oil
(40b)
The shape of the yield surface, and more generally the shape of the state boundary
surface as this includes the specification of how F varies with h, must now be
prescribed. So also must a plastic potential Q. This will first be formulated for the
(i) This is for the Mohr Coulomb formulation, but will not generally be the case.
284
plane strain case so that use will be made of Equation (40b) rather than (40a).
Figure 5 shows the general shape of the s.b.s. Its shape is based on experimental
findings(i). All the yield surfaces are similar in shape and their size can be
prescribed by the position of C, i.e. by CJc in Figure 5. The soil is at the critical
state when its state is represented by point C. Its characteristic then is that there
must be no volumetric strain change. The soil at this point will deform at constant
stress. This has implications for the flow rule which must prescribe zero plastic
volumetric strain at C. This means that for plane strain the flow rule arrow if
represented in a CJd,CJs space must be parallel to the CJdaxis.
The change of CJ c with h is assumed to be exponential, i.e. the 'critical state line'
which is the locus of the point C is a straight line in the semi-log plot of Figure
5(c). The slope of this line is the material parameter X. It is defined as follows (as
can be seen from Figure 5b).
dh = L
CJ dCJ ( 41)
e C
A-K (42)
X l+e
Equation (41) is the hardening law. As F will be expressed in terms of CJc rather
than h it will be convenient to use (41) to make the substitution
(43)
o.c. region
(44)
in which S :: S/Scs and Sand Scs are respectively the slope of the yield line and
critical state line, as shown in Figure 5(b).
(i) In the original Cam clay model developed at Cambridge the shape was derived
from theoretical consideration rather than as a direct fit to test data.
285
QOC ud + Ro (U C S )2 = 0 (45)
= 2U-U
c
(46)
which is the same as the form used with the K-G model. i.e. equation (22) above.
n.c. region
(47)
It is easily verified that at the critical state (when Us = U c) F nc = F oc and also that
Onc prescribes zero plastic volume change. i.e. '" = O.
Determination of the components of !2ep. i.e. (:1. ~. l!.f involves first differentiating
F and 0 with respect to Uc and the stress invariants us.ud. Then the partial
derivatives of Us and ud with respect to the plane strain components of stress are
required. Details are given in Chapter 7 of Naylor et al (1983).
A general form of the model suitable for three dimensional applications can most
easily be obtained by proceeding exactly as above but using Equation (40a) instead of
(40b) and um.uq in lieu of us.ud. This formulation has the disadvantage that the
o.c. part of the model does not incorporate a Mohr-Coulomb criterion. Just as for
the um.uq K-G model it incorporates a Drucker Prager type of yield surface. If
depicted on Figure 3 it would be circular in the 'Pi' plane and would enclose the
Mohr-Coulomb surface coinciding with it along the lines A.
A formulation suitable for 3D use incorporating the Mohr-Coulomb, or indeed any
other preferred yield criterion, may be obtained by defining F and 0 in terms of urn'
U and e. where e is the Lode angle which measures the orientation in the Pi plane.
T'l.is involves some algebraic complexity but does not introduce any new concepts.
The writer has made a number of modifications to the basic model described above to
make it better for practical applications using the finite element method. There are
two main changes. as follows.
Firstly. the o.c. yield surface has been changed from the Mohr-Coulomb straight
line to an ellipse. Initially this was a continuation of the n.c. ellipse but this has
been changed to a 'flattened' ellipse. A 'flattening parameter'. p. can be assigned so
that if p.=O the M.C. line is retained. or if p.=1 the n.c. ellipse continues into the
o.c. region (Figure 6). Associative plasticity is assumed throughout. This has certain
computational advantages. p.=~ is probably suitable for most situations. In addition.
provision has been made to shift the yield surface and the critical state line to the
286
~ 1.4.
1- - - - ' - - - 1
. .
4.4 C.S.PARAMETERS
The following 7 parameters are required for the basic model described in Section 4.2:
Elastic moduli - E and v (or K and G)
Plastic compressibility - X
Slope of critical state line - Scs (or 'Pcs since Scs = 2 sin 'Pcs)
Slope of critical O.c. yield line - S (or 'P since S = 2 sin 'P
Dilatancy at zero stress - Ra (or fo since Ra = 2 sin fo)
Initial size of yield surface - (Jco
The model modified as described in 4.3 above dispenses with the parameters Sand
Ra (or 'P and ifo) but adds (Jt (or ccs = crt Tan 'Pcs) , I'- and a power index n needed
for the c.p.c.s.m. formulation. I'- and n, however, can be c1asssified as parameters
which determine the version of the model rather than material properties. They may
be fixed without reference to the particular situation under study. (Jt provides a
means of refining the model for low stress conditions and will often be zero.
There are therefore five essential parameters: E, J', X, Scs (or 'PcS> and (Jco' The
last three of these are normally the most critical. X may be found from oedometer
or other consolidation tests which measure the loading and unloading Compression
287
indeces(i). These, plus the voids ratio, e, can be substituted into Equation (42) to
give X although this tends to overestimate it. <Pcs may be found as the slope of the
post-peak strength envelope from drained triaxial or shear box tests. (Tco is not so
easily evaluated for fills. For insitu clays it is related to the pre-consolidation
pressure, and this can be estimated from oedometer tests. For fills one would expect
it to be related to the compactive effort, but it is not yet established how this should
be done.
Table 3 presents preliminary values for the Beliche dam core and inner shell.
Figure 7 shows stress strain curves for a triaxial and one-dimensional test on the
inner shell material obtained from these parameters. These curves are compared with
the experimental results and the curves obtained from the K -G model using the
parameters identified by (D) and (W) in the last two rows in Table 2.
(i) i.e. C c or Cs in conventional soil mechanics notation. These are related to ),.
and K by C c = 2.3),. and Cs = 2.3K.
288
1500,.-----r---,-----,----r-----,
Iii 1000
a..
..lr::
,.,
---
b
I
b
500
- - Laboratory
- -[,5, model
- - - K-G model
2 4 6 8 10
e: (%)
1000
800
a.. 600
IV /' 1 Dry
::: //
b
400 / / End of .;}
200
... :::::.- ,..,
~ experiment ,.;.;
..::::-
Wet
0
0 2 3 4 5
e:'(%)
One dimensional test (e: 3=0)
Figure 7. Comparison of laboratory test, K-G and C.s.m. stress-strain curves for
Beliche dam soft rockfill
289
5. Conclusions
Variable elastic stress-strain laws are attractive in that they retain the simplicity of
linear elasticity and yet offer significant improvements on it by being able to
incorporate reasonably well the first three requirements listed in the Introduction.
Against this they cannot incorporate dilatancy (requirement 6), and they can only
incorporate unloading stiffness in a crude way.
A more subtle disadvantage of variable elastic laws compared with plasticity based
laws concerns the pattern of deformation during yielding. Measurement of strains in
soils (principally sandy soils) suggests that they do deform in the manner predicted by
elasto-plastic models. Basically this means that the deformation pattern (i.e. the
direction of the strain increment vector in strain space) depends on the accumulated
stress (Le. the point in stress space) and not the stress increment as assumed in
variable elastic models. This difference is not revealed when there is no rotation of
pincipal stresses as in a triaxial test. It becomes significant, however, when there is
significant rotation as in the development of a shear failure surface in an embankment
dam.
The results of variable elastic analyses should be interpreted in the light of the
above. The advantage of the hyperbolic model is that the procedures for determining
its 8 or 9 parameters are well established. But against this there are too many of
them. The K-G model is relatively simple with only 5 parameters but fixing their
values is somewhat 'messy'.
A difficulty encountered in the selection of parameters for the Beliche dam rockfill
is worth mentioning here as it may be representative of at least low quality rockfills.
It was the impossibility of finding parameters which matched both isotropic
compression tests (on triaxial samples) and one dimensional compression tests. The
former tended to be concave, i.e. of low stiffness at low stress, and the latter convex
exhibiting a relatively high stiffness at low stress. Parameters matching the isotropic
test would grossly under-estimate the one-dimensional and vice versa. The problem
applied to all the models described here. A possible explanation is that the dilatancy
featured in these soils at low stress levels gives them a high stiffness when they are
constrained laterally. This needs to be investigated further.
A considerable amount of experience has now accumulated of the use of the three
variable elastic models described here in the back analysis of the construction of
embankment dams, plus a little experience of the post construction stages. For this
reason alone they have some future in predictive analyses, at least for the construction
stage.
Elasto-plastic models of the critical state type have the greatest potential. In
addition to their theoretical advantages their parameters are for the most part readily
obtained from standard strength and compression tests. Little experience has as yet
been accumulated in applying them to fills. A particular matter which requires
investigation here is how to select the stress history parameter (Tco'
290
References
1. Introduction
This chapter covers a ll types of fills which are built up in layers. This includes road
embankments as well as e mba nkment dams. Concern will be principally with the
latter as it is for the more complex fill s such as these that finite element analysis
becomes necessary.
There are two ma in types of embankment dam: that containing a relatively
im pervious internal core supported by rockfill shoulders, and the upstream membrane
dam. Usually rockfill and clayey fill are involved in the former and just rockfill in
the latter. The upslream membrane is usually e ither concrete or ashphalt.
An important purpose of finite element analysis of e mbankment dams is to
dete rmi ne internal st ress distributions . This is necessary to find out if there is a
danger of tensile effecti ve stresses (i.e. total stresses less than the pore pressure)
developing which could cause cracks. The analyses are also used to ca lculate
displacements. Although disp lace me nts are , at least in the case of clay core dams,
ultimately of less interest than the stresses they a re important because they ca n
relatively easily be measured . This makes it possible to calibrate a n analysis against
measurements laken al an early stage, or on a tr ia l fill, so that the accuracy of the
assumed soil stiffness can be improved . This in turn will lead to a more accurate
stress calculation.
The construction stage, covered in Sections 2 10 7, is the first and most
straightforward part of the overall process, and there is considerable experience of the
fin ite eleme nt mode lling of it . This started with work done principally in the U.S. A.
in the 196Os. Some of the ke y papers covering this and later work are given in the
Bibliography. The subsequent impound ing and operation stages, dea lt wi th in Section
9 el seq., are much more in the developme nt stage . A correctl y pe rformcd
construction analysis is a necessary prelude to the later analyses as they will carryon
from it.
Where pore pressures a rc involved the re is usually a choice between carrying out
analyses in terms of tota l or effective stress. In the case of dry rockfill the two
methods become the same. For clay materials, however , there is a distinctio n. This
has little bearing on the construction techniques described in Sections 2 to 7 but has
on the und rained construction of clay fl11s and on the post-constr uction ana lyses.
Effective stress techniques are t herefore described before the latter, i.e . in Section 8.
291
E. Marallha das Nel't's led. }. Alimllces ill k ()c~fi/l SI",,.mres. 291-340.
1991 Klmwr Acudrmic P,,/'/ishus.
292
It is shown that they have certain advantages due to their flexibility and the ease
whereby measured pore pressures can be incorporated in the analysis.
The techniques for modelling construction are only to a small extent affected by
the material law used to describe the soil. Material laws are covered in Chapter 11.
The Chapter ends with case studies which illustrate the modelling of construction
and the subsequent operation of three embankment dams.
Fills for road or rail embankments or for embankment dams are invariably built up in
compacted layers. These range in thickness from about 150mm for clay fills to about
1m for rock fills.
The thickness of the physical layer will, therefore, generally be small compared
with the height of the completed fill. In a typical embankment dam, say 50m high,
there will be of the order of 100 layers. It will not be practical to make the finite
element layers of similar thickness to the actual ones. There would be far too many
finite elements. Instead thick finite element layers (perhaps 10m thick) will be used
so that there may be as few as five.
The following four sections show how the finite element analyses can be carried out
and the results interpreted so that these thick analytical layers can correctly represent
the real situation. There are two issues here:
(1) the correct interpretation of computed displacements,
(2) the appropriate stiffness of a finite element layer as it is placed.
Before proceeding further deformation in a rising fill must be defined.
When dams are built markers to measure settlement, lateral movement, or both are
installed within the dam. These are installed as the fill is being raised so that they
are embedded just below the current surface. The datum for movement is then
established, i.e. the deformation is zero when the instrument is installed. (Ideally it
should be on the fill surface but in order to prevent damage to the marker from the
compaction equipment it will usually be 1 to 1m below the surface.)
Deformation is therefore defined as the movement of a marker installed on the
surface of the rising fill. With this definition computer deformations can be directly
compared with the measurements.
as they are needed involves less computing at the expense of added complication.
The first stage in the analysis is to make the necessary geometric idealisation, Le.
whether the analysis is to be two- or three-dimensional, whether or not the
foundation is to be included in the mesh, and what type of elements should be used.
A factor to be considered here is the construction sequence. Is the fill to be raised
evenly so that layer boundaries can be assumed horizontal? Or is part of the fill
(such as an upstream cofferdam) to be constructed ahead of the rest? The layer
boundaries should be chosen to accommodate this, i.e. they should roughly correspond
to the actual fill surface as the fill is raised. A finite element layer, although it
cannot be less than one element thick, can (and often does) contain more than one
layer of finite elements.
Then the material properties must be chosen. This involves the selection of a
material model and the major decision of selecting parameter values. Provision must
also be made for the stiffness adjustment of the new layers. See Section 6 below.
In general initial stresses must be prescribed. These must be self equilibrating, and
if the foundation is included in the finite element model insitu stresses should be
assigned to it(i). If the ground surface is level these can be prescribed directly as )'h
vertical and Ko)'h horizontal (Ko generally having to be assumed). Otherwise a
preliminary excavation analysis from a level ground surface may be required to
calculate a self equilibrating stress field.
The initial stresses in the embankment itself will usually be set to zero - at least
in terms of total stress. This is consistent with the concept of a new layer being
initially weightless. The applied gravity imposes the stresses. This does not, however
11} 1
'Ghost' elements New layer at least
//~-,-", one element thick
L ~
Old I,ye"
I'~-I~
~=s..:ct",1 I,ym
{"'-Elements in foundation If compressible-------./'
(i) These may be omitted if the ground is modelled as linear elastic as its stiffness
is not affected by the stress level. The stresses, if needed, can then be
determined later by adding an initial stress field.
294
take into account any stresses locked into the material by the compaction plant. This
will be considered in Section 7 where it is shown that for clay soils analysed in terms
of effective stress an initial negative pore pressure (suction) balanced by an equal
compressive effective stress (thus making the initial total stress zero) is required.
o
:r
= 0 Y(H-Y) (1)
,
- - (orrect profile
layer 3 6I~ o Layer boundary
values Icorrect)
x Mid layer values
4 0 lincorrect)
t
layer
t
2
: <) - - - -Incorrect profile
t
layer 1 l _x/
t O~'_'_
o 10 5 mm
The above illustration is based on the assumption of a linear material. Fill is not, of
course, linear elastic and will in general have a stiffness which increases with
confining stress and therefore with depth below the surface. The procedure for
interpreting the finite element displacements is not affected by non-linearity.
Furthermore the settlement profile remains approximately parabolic (and also
symmetric) for quite significant non-linearity. To verify this consider a fill with a
296
D = Do + all (2)
where Do and 0' are material constants. By carrying out a double integration the
following expression for the settlement 0 of a marker located Y above the base of
the fill and Z below its surface (H=Y+Z) is obtained:
"(Do
0 0'2
(DHLnDH - DyLnDy - DZLnDZ) (3)
Table 2 compares the profile obtained from Equation (3) with that of the linear
elastic example (Equation (1 )). The symmetry of 0 about Y=Z=H/2 and the small
difference between the two profiles may be noted.
It remains to show that for the one-dimensional case the stiffness of the new finite
element layer is of no consequence. This stiffness has no effect on the vertical stress
in the underlying material which is only affected by the weight of the new layer.
The new layer stiffness, of course, affects the displacement within the new layer. As
these are to be ignored (as has been shown above) it can be concluded that the new
layer stiffness had no effect on the settlement profile nor on the stress distribution.
(There is just one qualification here. The Poisson's ratio, or its equivalent for
non-linear models, must be the same in the new and underlying layers otherwise
there will be some effect on the horizontal stress.)
Although in one-dimensional fills the stiffness of the new finite element layer is of no
consequence this is not necessarily the case in general due to bending of the new
layers as gravity is applied to them. If a new finite element layer is given its
in-place stiffness value from the start then it will offer a greater resistance to bending
297
than in the real situation. This is because in reality bending occurs progressively as
the layer is built up. It would appear that some stiffness between zero and the
in-place stiffness would make the finite element layer equivalent to the real situation.
A stiffness reduction factor, f, is therefore introduced. It is defined as follows:
(4)
Q is the in-place modulus matrix(i) and Q r its reduced value for the new layer.
1 <f<oo.
The need for stiffness reduction was recognised by the early workers in this field.
Thus Kulhawy et al (1969) found that similar accuracy could be obtained using 7
layers and a large f in the 'standard dam' of Clough and Woodward (1967) as in a
14 layer analysis with f=l.
The question arises: is there an optimum value of f which can be applied
generally? It appears that there is, at least for fills modelled as linear elastic. The
value is f=4. This is obtained by making the flexural rigidity, EI, of the new finite
element layer the same as the equivalent EI of the same thickness of fill built up in
many layers. The derivation is quite subtle and is given in the Appendix.
The precise choice of f is not critical becoming less so as the number of layers is
increased, or as there is less bending in the fill (Le. as it tends to the
one-dimensional case). No optimum value has been determined for non-linear
material laws. For lack of a better criterion it is suggested that f=4 should be used
for all cases in the realisation that quite big variations from this value would have
little effect on the results.
In order to assess the sensitivity of settlement profiles to variations in both f and
the number of layers Naylor and Mattar (1988) made a study of a hypothetical clay
core dam with the clay core contained between rigid shoulders. The geometry was
inspired by the Beliche dam in Portugal(ii). See Figure 3. Rigid shoulders served to
exaggerate the bending effect in the layers and thereby produce a test situation more
severe than would normally occur in practice.
Figures 4 and 5 show respectively the effect of different layer thicknesses using a
near optimum f value, and the effect of different f values for a given number of
layers. Figure 6 shows the effect of different layer thicknesses on analyses of the
actual Beliche dam using a near optimum f value and the K-G model (iii).
Discounting the first 10m, which was excavation to bed rock over the core contact
area, the analyses comprised two, three and six layers.
(i) Q can represent either a linear or a non-linear matrix. In the latter case
it will typically relate small increments of stress to strain. It will be 3x3,
4x4 or 6x6 according to whether the analysis is plane strain, axi-symmetric
or 3-dimensional.
(ii) There is a paradox here as if ever there was a case of a dam that did
not have rigid shoulders it is the Beliche dam!
(iii) f values ranging from 3 to 5 were used for the K-G analyses. Some of
these were carried out before the optimum figure of 4 had been
determined.
298
dam
u/s t
I
,
I
\
,,
\
A_.p_-t-=t-f'
typical elem!nt
, smooth,f_+-+-l-
B-I;>-+-+-L
1
If-+-+-+ _ fixed boundaries
12m
Figure 3. Rigid shoulders finite element mesh (after Naylor and Mattar. 1988)
20 20
.
~
I
~
I
.
10 10
Figure 4. Rigid shoulders study - effect of number of layers (after Naylor and
Mattar. 1988)
299
Legend o f = 1000
o f = 3 !lin ell.4IK-GI
.,.... o f =1
~~
30 0,:::,... 30
""~ ~
0" \
20
\ 20
I
Figure 5. Rigid shoulders study - effect of 'f' (after Naylor and Mattar, 1988)
50~
40 ~
\ of
30
El
\
!
m
20
10
/
200 400 mm
7. Modelling Compaction
Compaction causes a temporary increase in vertical total stress as the roller passes.
There will be an associated increase in horizontal total stress some of which will be
retained.
Ingold (1979) studied the compaction of fills behind retaining walls. He showed
how the horizontal stresses are modified by compaction and how they vary with
depth. He proposed an idealised horizontal stress distribution in which a passive
lateral pressure applies from the surface to a depth depending on the effective weight
of the roller (a vibratory roller is typically double the effective weight of a
non-vibratory one). It is then constant with depth until the active pressure equals
this value. Below this the horizontal stress is assumed equal to the active pressure.
Ingold's work is useful in that it gives an indication of the depth to which
compaction affects the lateral stress and below which it is 'overtaken' by the self
weight induced stresses. This depth lies in the approximate range 3 to 5m for
compaction equipment in common use. For a large dam this would be less than the
thickness of a finite element layer.
Consequently, and because it would be very difficult to incorporate it properly,
compaction is not usually explicitly modelled in a finite element analysis, i.e. the
initial total stresses are assumed to be zero. Gravity is, therefore, the sole
mechanism for building up the stress. The effects of compaction are incorporated in
the material parameters. A stiffer and stronger material would represent a more
heavily compacted fill. (In the case of critical state-type elasto-plastic models the
initial size of the yield surface should reflect the amount of compaction (see Chapter
11 ).
In clay fills, such as in the central cores of embankment dams, compaction will
lock in suctions (negative pore pressures). Consequently the fill after compaction will
be in a state of compressive effective stress balanced by negative pore pressure. The
total stress, being (according to Terzaghi's principle of effective stress) the sum of the
two, will be near zero. In the case of the Carsington dam in England initial suctions
of about 130 kPa were estimated in the medium-stiff clay core.
This phenomena can be readily incorporated in a finite element analysis if the
analysis is carried out in terms of effective stress. In fact it is highly desirable that
it should be so that meaningful pore pressures and effective stresses are calculated for
the end of construction (or at stages during construction).
To do this an appropriate initial negative pore pressure (u o ) and equal compressive
direct effective stresses (o-xo '=0- 0 '=0- zo '=-u o ) are assigned to the fill elements. Uo
needs to be selected so that t6e calculated effective stresses and pore pressures are
approximately correct at the end of construction or of a construction stage. This will
mean that the shear strength of the clay will be correctly reproduced, an important
factor for non-linear material models incorporating an effective stress strength
criterion. It will not matter if the pore pressure and effective stress is not so
accurate just below the surface of the rising fill. Due to the changing saturation of
the soil in this region the real situation is complicated and a simplification has to be
made. This means that the initial suction (-u o ) must usually be set higher than its
actual value, as will now be explained.
Clay fills will invariably be partly saturated immediately after compaction. As the
fill level is raised the degree of saturation will increase as, due to the increasing
pressure, the air in the voids is adsorbed into the pore water. For fills placed wet
of optimum (as is now common practice) the clay will become essentially saturated
when the fill depth is considerably less than the final fill height. It is not
301
unreasonable, therefore, in this case to idealise the final clay fill as fully saturated.
Refer now to Figure 7. This represents a point in the core of a central clay core
dam where the clay has been placed wet of optimum. AC represents the effective
stress path followed during construction, which is assumed to be sufficiently rapid that
little consolidation occurs, i.e. it is undrained. C represents yielding of the clay and
it is likely that this will be reached some time before the dam has reached its full
height. The material will then be in a critical state (in the sense used in critical
state soil mechanics) so that the stress stays at point C as further deformation occurs.
OD is the corresponding total stress path. OA represents the initial suction locked in
by the compaction. CD represents the final (positive) pore pressure and the crossing
of AC and OD marks the change of pore pressure from negative to positive.
In the finite element analysis the clay is treated as saturated from the start and is
assumed to be undrained. To get the correct final effective stresses (i.e. point C in
Figure 8) it is necessary to specify an initial suction OB somewhat greater than the
actual suction OA. The effective stress path BC will then be followed in the
analysis. OB can be estimated given a knowledge of the undrained shear strength,
c u ' the effective stress failure envelope and the shape of the line BC. For linear
elastic soils and some non-linear models (including the K-G) BC will be vertical, i.e.
parallel to the ordinate. For critical state models it will be curved as shown and can
be approximately quantified.
This is the first place in this chapter where it has been necessary to distinguish
between total and effective stress methods. It is now, therefore, appropriate to
explain the finite element effective stress technique. This is done in the next section.
/
/ - '- Effstress yield line
--~---
c/
.--~-
o
/
1'
/ \ --- cr path (fe & actual)
/1. \
7 \
1-- Actual cr' \ - - Le. cr' path
U(actuall A B
- 0 t--
-u (le.1
o
The concept of undrained loading implies that deformation occurs with negligible
movement of pore fluid relative to the soil skeleton. This can be understood by
imagining the soil to be made up of two components which share the same physical
space - a soil skeleton component and a pore fluid component. These are visualised
as continuous materials, both occupying all the space. This is consistent with the
continuum model used to describe the soil. Its real particulate nature is only implied.
If loading is undrained then the two components deform together, they undergo the
same strains. If there is drainage the two components move past each other like a
ghost passing through a wall.
Terzaghi's principle of effective stress for general stress states
Q: = Q:' + mu (5)
where ~ indicates 'change in', for the moment not necessarily small.
For total stress analysis the material law must relate changes in total stress to
strain. A modulus matrix Q must be defined such that
(7)
303
(8)
(9)
To get Equation (9) in matrix form corresponding to (7) and (8) pre-multiply by
ill to give
(10)
This is the key to effective stress finite element analysis of undrained problems. It
allows a total stress stiffness matrix to be obtained simply by adding the stiffness
contributions from the soil skeleton and pore fluid components.
The equivalent pore fluid bulk modulus Kf is related to the actual bulk moduli of
the pore fluid Kw and the soil particles Kp (not to be confused with the skeleton
modulus K') and the porosity, n, according to
n I-n
+ (12)
K p ' being the modulus of the rock minerals of which the particles are composed, will
generally be very large so that the second term on the right side of (12) will
probably be negligible.
If the soil is saturated with water then Kw is approximately 20Pa, and Kf will be
of this order. Since this is some two orders of magnitudes higher than the bulk
stiffness of the soil skeleton, K', the results of the analysis will be very insensitive to
its precise value. For this reason Kf == 2 OPa is generally a suitable value for the
undrained analysis of saturated soil.
The same formulation can also be used for drained conditions simply by setting
Kf==O. This is a nice feature of the effective stress method as it alIows the boundary
assumptions of Undrained and Drained to be investigated using the same soil skeleton
parameters D'. Only Kf is changed.
Kf values intermediate between zero and the large value suitable for a saturated soil
304
may be used to represent (1) a partly saturated soil under undrained loading, or (2) a
partly drained condition. Both are unsatisfactory. It is difficult to choose an
appropriate value for (1) due to the problem of changing saturation as air goes into
or comes out of solution. (2) is even worse. For partly drained conditions one
should either carry o.ut a formal coupled consolidation analysis, which is complex and
costly, or guestimate(l) where the result lies between the undrained and drained extremes.
The implementation of the above theory into a finite element code is
straightforward. It involves the following:
(1) Alter the data input to read separately the components of Q' (e.g. just E' and
v' if linear elastic) and Kf.
(2) Apply Equation (11) in the stiffness formulation to obtain Q so that the stiffness
matrix is identical to that in a total stress analysis.
(3) Make no changes to the stiffness assembly and equation solving parts of the
program. This means that nodal displacements and strains (Ll.) are precisely as
in a total stress program.
(4) At the stress calculation stage arrange for the separate calculation of LlQ:' by
Equation (8) and Llu by (9).
There are no restrictions on Q other than those which apply in any case to a
displacement finite element formulation. (In .. particular that it should not be singular.
This implies that Kf should not be too large(II).)
It is, in principle, possible to analyse an undrained problem either in terms of
effective stress or total stress and obtain the same results. The difference will only
be that the former decomposes the stress into its effective and pore pressure
components. Equation (11) must be satisfied. This presents a problem in non-linear
problems where the stiffness is stress dependent so that Q = QJ) and Q' = D'J').
Then there would be practical difficulties in satisfying Equations (\\ ) for varying
stress. This difficulty does not arise with linear elasticity, which will now be used to
illustrate this point.
Plane strain conditions and isotropic elasticity are assumed. Equation (\\) then
takes the form
}
G ~ G'
and K= K' + Kf (14 )
also K ~ K'+ Kf
(ii) Particular care should be taken in layered analyses where ghost elements
are used with a very small stiffness together with elements containing a
large Kf. Numerical ill conditioning then becomes a real danger.
305
Example:
Suppose a saturated soil has stiffness defined in terms of effective stress by E' = 30
MPa and v' = 0.25 and an undrained analysis is to be carried out. What are the
parameters for equivalent effective and total stress analyses?
The effective stress parameters are E' and v' as above plus a suitable value of Kf.
2GPa (= 2000 MPa) is assumed. Using the standard relations between elastic
parameters
E' 30
G G' 12 MPa
2(1+v') 2xl.25
E' 30
and K' = 20 MPa
3(1-2v' ) 3xO.5
By Equation (13)
E and v (in terms of total stress) are now obtained from further standard relations as
9KG 9x2020x12
E 35.9 MPa
3K+G 3x2020 + 12
These, therefore, are the total stress parameters which correspond to E', v' and Kf.
Note that if Kf were made very large v would tend to 0.5 and Q. would become
singular.
The basis of this technique is that the increase in pore pressure (L1u) in effect applies
a body force of intensity Q to the soil skeleton according to:
Q = -'i7(L1u) (15)
Here Q is simply Archimedean uplift on the newly flooded sand, i.e. 10 kN/m 30).
The net uplift would actually be less than this due to the added weight of the water
filling the voids of the 3m sand layer. It would probably be 7 or 8 kN/m 3
. ,
y
~I
In,tiol p =-~ lJu
Y ay
o
I.. 30
"'1 KPo 10 KN/m 3
Pore pressure Body force
Figure 8. Known pore pressure change technique applied to rising water table (after
Naylor, el ai, 1983)
What follows mainly applies to embankment dams, particularly those with internal
cores. Some of it, however, is also relevant to fills which are not dams where for
some reason a water tables rises. The sections dealing with the water loading and
collapse settlement apply here. A much simpler one-dimensional approach which
need not involve finite element analysis may, however, be sufficient for such fills.
The stages of interest following the construction of an embankment dam are first
the end of impounding, then the 'steady seepage' condition which will be attained in
pervious core dams some time after the reservoir has been filled, and, finally, rapid
drawdown.
Compared with the modelling of construction relatively little has been done in
applying the finite element method to these subsequent stages. Here attention is
focussed on the impounding. Brief treatment is also given of the steady seepage
condition but as will be seen this can be analysed as a small variation on the case of
slow impounding. Finite element techniques for modelling drawdown are not covered.
Little work has been done on this.
The post construction performance of dams containing a zoned internal core are
complicated. This is illustrated in Figure 9 which shows in a qualitative way how the
pore pressure at the point X could be expected to vary during construction and
reservoir filling. Prediction of the pore pressure is diffult because of the simultaneous
actions of the dissipation of excess pore pressures caused by physical movements of
(i) The unit weight of water is taken here, as elsewhere, as 10 rather than 9.81
kN/m 3
307
the dam (due to the weight of the dam and the reservoir) and the pore pressures due
to the penetration of the reservoir water into the core.
Pore
pressure
at X
Seepage
Excess pore pressure due to Imposed loads on core
A rigorous modelling which would take into account this 'coupled flow' problem
requires the use of a coupled consolidation analysis incorporating the Biot theory.
This is difficult both from the point of view of the analysis itself and because of the
difficulty in assuming meaningful permeabilities. Naylor, Knight and Ding (1988) did
manage to apply the Biot theory in the back analysis of the Monasavu dam and
obtain pore pressures in reasonable agreement with the piezometer measurements.
However, as this was a back analysis, it was possible to adjust the permeabilities to
obtain the agreement. This cannot be done in a predictive analysis. This method is
not covered in this chapter and the interested reader is referred to the above paper
where the theory is also given.
For dams where the internal core pore pressures are important the approach taken
here as an alternative to a coupled consolidation analysis involves either bounding
assumptions as to whether conditions in the core can be assumed to be 'drained' or
'undrained', or the assumption of pore pressure 'scenarios' . This is the
known-pore-pressure-change technique of the previous chapter. The pore pressures
need to be estimated separately from the finite element analysis.
A most important factor affecting internal core dams is that of col/apse settlement.
This is the phenomena whereby the saturation of rockfills causes them to settle (i). It
is most marked in poor quality rockfills particularly if they are not heavily compacted.
(i) The writer has also called this 'saturation shrinkage' as being descriptive without
the connotation of collapse in the sense of a complete failure of the dam.
'Collapse settlement' has, however, wide usage; but the title should be used in
full, as to talk of 'collapse' implies failure!
308
The Beliche dam in south-east Portugal exhibited significant collapse settlement. This
was an intended design feature. It is described in the case studies section at the end
of this chapter. The EI Infiernillo dam in Mexico (Marsal and Ramirez 1967)
provides a classic example. This 148m high dam has a narrow central clay core.
During reservoir filling the core first deformed downstream (as would be
expected) but by the time the reservoir had reached its full height collapse settlement
in the upstream shoulder had pulled the top of the core back until it was
approximately where it was at the start of impounding. This effect forms an
important part of the finite element analyses of impounding.
The water loading on and within the dam and foundation (assuming this is
compressible and/or pervious) is considered next. Then in Section 11 the finite
element procedures for modelling the impounding and the development of steady
seepage are covered. Although needed for the analyses of Section 11 the techniques
for modelling collapse settlement are dealt with after it in Section 12.
This is the simplest case. A hydrostatic pressure due to the water load acts on the
upstream face (Figure 10).
If the foundation is compressible and is included in the finite element mesh then
different idealisations of the loading are appropriate according to the physical
situations. The following will cover most cases:
(1) Impervious foundation (Figure 10a)
(2) Pervious foundation initially dry with an impervious vertical grout curtain
below the toe of the membrane (Figure lOb)
(3) Pervious foundation with initial water table at the ground surface and a
vertical grout curtain as for (2) (Figure 10c).
The loadings illustrated in Figure 10 correspond to what is here referred to as the
external load method. This will certainly be appropriate for the loading on the
upstream membrane. However, for foundation loadings the alternative internal loading
method described below may be more convenient.
This type of dam is not very common nowadays, but as the loading is similar yet
simpler than the general case of a pervious zoned dam of fill it serves here to
introduce the external and internal load methods. They are alternatives. Both
represent the same physical situation.
The loading differs from that of the upstream membrane dam only in that an
Archimedean uplift acts upstream of the membrane. This is shown by the upward
pointing arrows in Figure 11.
Such a loading would cause the upstream part to rise up. This does not happen
in practice as the Archimedean uplift is more than compensated by collapse
settlement.
309
~Foundahon elements
(If required) -------
t t___
(\'"
-I Assumed ImpervIous grout (urtam
t t t-~
(b) Pervious foundation initially dry
grout (urtain
..
Assumed ImpervIous
For al ternahve foundahon
I__ grout curtain
loadings see Figure 2 I
Figure 11. Reservoir loading on internal membrane dam - external load method
(i) Precisely the same for dry materials, but for free draining material below the
water table the pore pressure will be included in an effective stress analysis as a
'passenger', i.e. it will have no effect on the displacements nor on the stress
changes.
311
U o = Inherited or assumed 1 uf = Uo
u f = '6 . . h'" (If no seepage) L Impervious grout curtain
Figure 12. Reservoir loading on internal membrane dam - internal load method
Uf assumed
Inherited
uo=lnherlted* Uf
u f ='6 . . h .... I varies I
Figure l3. Reservoir loading on central core dam - internal load method - slow
filling
312
This type of dam contains a more or less central zone of relatively impervious
material flanked by shoulders of, typically, rockfill. The central zone or core is
usually clay but can be non-plastic comprising silt/sand mixtures. The shoulders are
usually relatively permeable. Their purpose is to support the core.
The difference between this type of dam and the central membrane dam considered
in 10.2 is that the time taken for the development of seepage through the core needs
to be taken into account. This is complicated as illustrated in Figure 9. Two
extreme conditions may be considered:
(1) Filling sufficiently rapid that negligible penetration of water into the core
occurs during impounding.
(2) Very slow filling so that steady seepage is established in the core by the
time the reservoir is full.
The truth, of course, will lie between these extremes. The second may be a
reasonable approximation of the situation some time (Le. some years) after filling if
the reservoir has been kept more or less full.
Condition (1) is idealised by pretending that an impervious membrane exists on the
upstream face of the core. The loading then is the same as that for an internal
membrane dam (Section 10.2, Figures 11 and 12). The external or internal load
methods may be used. The core would be idealised as undrained.
For Condition (2) an assessment of the final pore pressure field in the core is
required. This may be determined independently of the finite element analysis, e.g.
by a steady state seepage analysis. Alternatively a pore pressure 'scenario' may be
assumed. (The assumption of a number of different scenarios to represent extreme
possibilities is in the writer's opinion a very good way of using the finite element
method.) If the analysis is a back analYSis the final pore pressure field can be based
on piezometer measurements. (Not precisely because there are always vagaries in
such measurements.) The internal load method must then be used, i.e. the analysis
becomes a known-pore-pressure-change analysis in which the initial and final pore
pressure fields over the whole mesh are provided as data (Figure 13).
The reservoir filling analysis will normally be preceded by a construction analysis
which will provide the end of construction stresses, and pore pressures if it is an
effective stress analysis, as initial values for the reservoir filling. There will usually
be initial excess pore pressures in the clay core, and possibly in the foundation as
well. These may have resulted from an undrained construction analysis, or from a
construction analysis involving the known-pore-pressure-change technique to make the
end of construction pore pressures agree with measurements. In any case,
complicated pore pressure distributions in the core can be expected thus underlining
the need for the internal load method of analysis in this case. In the shoulders the
situation will be simpler. In both there will usually be no pore pressures at the end
of construction, and then on impounding there will be a hydrostatic distribution in the
upstream shoulder and probably still zero pore pressure in the downstream shoulder.
This can involve just a single finite element analysis in which initial stresses and pore
pressures are inherited from a preceding construction analysis and the loadings are as
313
given in the preceding section. (Displacements and strains can, if desired, also be
inherited.) If collapse settlement is a factor, as it will be in most dams except the
upstream membrane type, then obviously the finite element program must incorporate
the theory described in Section 12 below.
For major dams it will be desirable to carry out a staged analysis. This will not
make much difference if there is little or no collapse settlement (and none at all if
the material is modelled as linear). Where significant collapse settlement occurs then
the number of stages should be similar to the number of layers used for construction,
perhaps in the range 3 to 6.
The procedure for a staged filling analysis is quite straightforward and free of the
subtleties of displacement interpretation and new layer stiffness reduction which occur
in construction analysis. Figure 14 illustrates the loading required using the internal
load method for the central core dam case. Note that the pressure distributions for
each stage are not the total-to-the-end-of-that-stage but are incremental, i.e. a
linear pressure increase over the height of the current stage and constant below that.
rI p;r:::r.::I~~_"':U~O":':=':'O:':'U:!.f":':=l\~wh,
uo=l\.,,(h,-H,)
(a) Stage 1
Uf=l\w h,
Uo=l\w h,
Uf=l\whZ
Here the detail of how the loads of Section 2 can be applied is considered. This
concerns the input provisions in the finite element code.
The loadings involve the application of
(1) Surface tractions acting normal to element sides (faces in 3D) and varying
in intensity across the side.
(2) Body forces.
These loadings must at some stage be converted to nodal forces to form the finite
element load vector. This can either be done by the analyst or done within the
program. The latter is virtually essential and all finite element codes intended for
geotechnical use should have this facility. The theory for deriving the nodal forces
corresponding to surface tractions and body forces is not given here. It is based on
the virtual work method and the reader is referred to standard finite element texts.
It is covered in Chapters 2 and 3 of Naylor et al (1983).
Not all codes, however, provide for variation of surface pressures and body forces
across elements. If this is not possible then a stepped distribution of pressure would
be required with consequent error. One way of inputting a smooth variation of
tractions along element sides is to assign sets of tractions (in this case the pressure
normal to the element surface) to element nodes. The element side has also to be
identified. Thus in Figure 4 if there were five layers of elements over the depth HU)
six surface pressure sets ranging from zero at the surface to 'YJiw at the bottom
would be input.
A similar facility may also be used for prescribing varying body forces. This,
however, is not normally necessary as a single value can usually be applied to a
complete element. (It is noted in passing that this procedure for assigning values by
sets to nodes and allowing the program to calculate their distribution over the
elements can also be used for material properties, initial stresses, etc. This is highly
desirable in geotechnical applications where significant variations across elements
commonly occur.)
0.80
0
0.75
+=
IV
0:
'C
0
>
0.70
0.65
0.1 10 10 30
AppLied Load-tons per sq ft
Figure 15. Effect of saturation in oedometer tests on silt (after Burland, 1965)
316
15
s
\
\
10 I
\ (3)
S \ ---
- -.. . . , V ....
\ _ - - - - - (1)
........
o
o 5 10 15
- -_ _ _ _ _ 5
(d)
O"d
0"3=P O"d
(5)
S/,-0"3=P
.A'
/1
/ I
/
0
Ea 0 / Ea
A B
0 Ea 0 Ea
b \B b
", ........
Ey
a D E y\
a 6'-
(a) Conventional presentation
Figure 17. Nobari and Duncan's method for clamped saturation stress change
318
Stress space
0
(bl
D,S
~n
These figures illustrate the
nonlinear case. For linear
elastic materials all the lines
space
00 and as are straight a
(cl
o = Stress,strain origin
Figure 18. General method for clamped saturation stress change (after Naylor et ai,
1989)
Figure 17(a) illustrates the procedure. First a test on the dry soil is carried out at
a selected cell pressure p(d). It is required to find the saturated deviator stress (T d(s)
which corresponds to the dry deviator stress (Td(d) indicated by the point D, and also
the saturated cell pressure (or minor principal stress) pes). In the left hand diagram
OA represents the consolidation stage and AD the drained shear stage. The point D
on the axial strain:volumetric strain plot is then identified. It is given the coordinates
a and b. The crux of the method is to carry out a test on the saturated soil which
will produce these same strains, i.e. with an fa: fV plot which passes through the
point D.
The detail of this is not given here, and the reader is referred to both the original
paper and Maranha has Neves and Veiga Pinto (1988) for a fuller explanation.
Suffice it to note that triaxial tests on the saturated material are carried out so as to
obtain the stress-strain plots in the right hand diagram of Figure 9(a). OB represents
the consolidation stage to a cell pressure pes). Point S on the (Td:fa curve then
defines the required saturation stress, (TiS).
The required clamped stress change is therefore from (Td(d),p(d) to (Td(s),P(s). This
provides the basis for part (b) of Stage 1, i.e. the determination of nodal forces to
effect the release of the imaginary clamps. The detail of this is very much tied to
the formulation of the hyperbolic model of Duncan and Chang. (See again Maranha
das Neves and Veiga Pinto, 1988.)
Figure 17(b) provides an alternative presentation of the Nobari-Duncan procedure
which allows it to be compared more easily with the method described in the next
section. (Tm is the mean stress which for the triaxial test is (P+(Td/3), and fd is a
deviatoric stress measure = (fa-fyf3). Other symbols are the same as in Figure
17(a).
319
The procedure for determining the 'clamped' stress change of Stage 1 (a) is first given.
This is the only part which differs from the Nobari-Duncan method. Next, Stage
l(b) is outlined and this applies to both methods. Stage 2, the application of the
water load, is not described here as this has already been covered in Section 10
above.
No reference is made here to the soil tests required to obtain the dry and
saturated material properties. They do not affect the theory. It is supposed that
suitable tests - triaxial, oedometer, or whatever - are carried out to define a dry
modulus matrix Q(d) and a saturated modulus matrix Q(s). These matrices will
correspond to the particular material law in use and will, in general, be stress
dependent and perhaps strain dependent as well.
To calculate the stress change for a newly saturated point in the fill it is supposed
that the dry soil is loaded from a state of zero effective stress to its pre-saturation
(calculated) stress state Q:(d). A straight stress path (OD in Figure 18) is assumed.
The strain path corresponding to the stress path, OD, is calculated. Note that in
general it is not sufficient just to calculate the strain, .s, corresponding to OD as the
path in strain space will not necessarily be straight. The saturated soil is then
supposed to be loaded up this strain path until the strain, .s, is reached. The
resulting stress Q:(s) is the required clamped post-saturation stress state.
This may be expressed as follows. Let the path OD be divided into n increments,
Ll(Ti(d). n will be chosen to suit the non-linearity of the stress-strain law. n can ::
1 if the material is linear elastic. Let Llf indicate the corresponding strain increment.
Then for an increment i
(16)
(17)
Here 12.(d) and 12.(s) are respectively the dry and saturated modulus matrices in terms
of effective stress. The clamped saturation stress is then
n
(T.(s)
-1
2 LlQ:i (s) (18)
i=l
In the program the path 00 will first be followed and the Ll.si stored in an array.
The strain path will then be followed and Q:/s) accumulated. This is done for each
'integrating point -(i).
This completes Stage 1 (a). The corrective nodal forces Q required to restore
equilibrium are then calculated from
(19)
(i) For numerically integrated finite elements. These will usually be Gauss points.
320
Here !! is the standard geometric matrix used in finite elements to relate strains to
element nodal displacements, Qe is a vector of element nodal forces and the
integration is taken over the element volume.
The Qe are assembled for each node (i.e. the contributions from elemp-nts sharing
the node added) to give the global nodal force vector Q. The solving of the finite
element equations for this load vector comprises Stage l(b).
Note that the stress path OD in Stage 1 (a) and the corresponding strain path are
not actually followed by the soil. They are simply a theory to enable (J(s) to be
calculated. The experimental findings (Figures 15 and 16) do suggest that this is a
reasonable theory. The selection of a straight line for OD is quite arbitrary,
however, and work needs to be done to determine the effect of different assumed
shapes for OD. The shape of this line identifies a difference between this and the
original Nobari-Duncan method. The line OD for the latter is kinked, i.e. it is the
line OAD in Figure 17(b).
For isotropic linear elasticity an explicit expression relating the clamped saturated
stress components to the dry stress can be obtained. This is readily derived by
introducing the components of the elastic Q matrices into Equations (16) and 17).
For plane strain, and using the 'K,G' form of the D matrix of Equation (13), one
obtains:
Q:( s)
[
(Jx
(Jy
T
(, [ rK+rC,
Symmetric
rK-rC,
rK+rC.
0
0
2rC
1[
(Jx
(Jy
T
(' (20)
K(s) C(s)
in which rK= --=-( d) , (K=K+C/3) , and rC - c(d)
K
The procedure used by Professor Justo and described in Chapter 6 fits into this
formulation as a special case. He assumes that Poisson's ratio is unchanged by
saturation so that rK=rG=(I-a) where 'a' is determined from tests. Substituting this
in (20) results in
Note that Equation (21) is only valid for the elastic case in which the dry and
saturated Poisson's ratios are the same.
f =
Now <red) = "Y.(H-y) = 18(6-y) kPa in which y is the height above the base.
Substituting D(d) = 9000 kPa:
18(6-y)
E = 9000
Y
(12 - Y)Y
c5y( 1)
J fydy =
2000
m (23)
0
Stage 1 is now complete. Figure 19 shows the stress :strain path for Stages 1 (a)
and 1(b) followed by a point at mid-height. The settlement profile corresponding to
Equation (23) is shown as the line (1).
Stage 2 comprises the upward application of an Archimedean body force of 10
kN/m 3. If the soil stiffness remained equal to D(s) this would add -10 by(l )/q to
the Stage 1 settlement. In this example, however, the soil is four times stiffer on
unloading so that the movement would be a factor of 4 less, i.e. <ry(2) = -2.5
(Ty(1 )/q with q = 6 MPa. Adding this to Equation (23) gives
7(12 - Y)Y
m (8)
24000
322
This is shown as line (2) in Figure 19. The associated stress:strain line is labelled 2.
Stage 2 is now complete.
By(mm)
0 10 20
6 60
0
Y(m)
4
2
kPa
C1
40
20
1/ /'
Oldl~
.
/,"
/1a
1(/
. IS
I
2
J
1
I,.Olsl
~ ~Olll
/1 I
0
o
Fictitous 0.5 Actual
Strams ( % ) -
By at end of
stages (1) & (2) Effective stress path at Y = 3m
Note the stiffness assumptions made in this example. The post-saturation stiffness
is assumed for Stages l(b) and 2. Also note that the soil is considered to be subject
to loading in Stage 1 b but to unloading in Stage 2.
323
13. Applications
Three dams on which finite element back analyses have been carried out are
described here. They comprise the Carsington dam in the U.K., the Beliche dam in
Portugal, and the Monasavu dam in Fiji. All three illustrate the procedures for
modelling construction, and the last two impounding as well. All three involve
known-pore-pressure-change analyses. Beliche is of particular interest for its collapse
settlement modelling. It is the only one of the three in which this was modelled.
Carsington is of interest because the dam collapsed at the end of construction. The
description given here of these three case studies is a slight modification of that given
by Naylor (1990).
This unusual dam was constructed entirely of clay between 1982 and 1984 and
collapsed as construction was nearing completion in early June 1984.
The finite element work carried out by the writer and described here comprised a
back analysis of the dam. Its objective was to determine the mechanism of failure.
The emphasis was on a realistic modelling of the stages of construction to determine
the development of stresses, pore pressures and deformations. Parallel finite element
work was carried out at Imperial College, London and is reported Dounias et al
(1988), and Potts et al (1990). The failure itself is described by Skempton and
Coates (1985) and then in detail in Coxon's (1986) report on it. Figure 20 shows a
cross-section on the valley centre. Here the failure slip surface passed through the
core, its 'boot' and then close to the base of the dam (in places passing into the
foundation) to emerge near the upstream toe.
The analyses were carried out in terms of effective stress using the K-G model
described in Chapter 11.
The summer construction seasons were idealised as undrained in the core but with
full drainage assumed over the bulk of the shells. (An intermediate assumption was
made for a transition zone around the core.) This idealisation allowed a non time
dependent effective stress analysis to be carried out.
The use of a high value of the equivalent pore fluid bulk modulus, Kf, in the core
idealised this material as a saturated clay. It was given the necessary shear strength
(c u in the region of 50 to 60 kPa) by the assigning of an initial suction of 130 kPa.
This simulated the effect of compaction as has been explained in Section 7 above.
Kf was set to zero in the shells (except in the transition zone where an intermediate
value was chosen).
During the winter period between the end of one construction season and the start
of the next the pore pressures adjusted as consolidation took place. The dam was
well supplied with piezometers (14 in the core at the mid-valley section) and these
provided a good record of the pore pressures. Advantage was taken of this to carry
out known-pore-pressure-change analyses to model the winter shut down period. An
approximation of the winter-end pore pressure field was input as the final pore
pressures. The initial pore pressures were inherited from the preceding undrained
construction analyses. These would not necessarily be in agreement with the measured
end of construction season values. (The extent to which they differe~ is or
considerable significance as will shortly be explained.)
In all six sequential analyses were used to model construction: OD, 1 U, ID, 2U,
2D, 3U. The number indicates the construction seasons, i.e. 1 :1982, 2 :1983, 3 :1984.
o is a preliminary analysis to model the foundation excavation. U and D indicate
324
Undrained and Drained respectively. Undrained being the construction stage and
Drained the known-pore-pressure-change stage. Figure 20 shows the main zones and
the levels reached at the end of each season.
Figure 21 compares measured and calculated pore pressures at the end of the 1983
construction season (when the bulk of the fill was placed) and indicates by shading
regions where the difference between measured and calculated is significant (> 50
kPa).
These differences illustrate the role of the finite element method as an arbiter
against which to compare measurements. Something unusual is happening in the
shaded regions, suggesting a need for further investigation. At Carsington the cause
of the unusually high pore pressures still awaits a full explanation. It was clearly an
important factor in the failure.
Another area of interest in the Carsington work was the modelling of the failure
mechanism. The analyses showed the development of a sheared zone which started
inside the dam (in the toe of the boot-shaped core) and spread outwards following
approximately the recorded slip plane. This aspect of the work, namely the use of
the finite element method to predict a shear failure, is outside the present scope. It
is discussed briefly by Naylor (1990)
Figure 20. Carsington dam valley centre section (after Naylor, 1990)
325
Figure 21. Carsington - comparison of end of 1983 construction pore pressures with
measured values (after Naylor, 1990)
This SSm high dam constructed between 1982 and 1985 has been the subject of
collaborative research between the Department of Civil Engineering in Swansea and
LNEC(i) in Lisbon, Portugal for a number of years. This started with separate
predictive analyses of the construction of the dam which were carried out before the
dam was built. The predictions are described by Naylor et al (1986). Subsequent
work has concentrated on the modelling of the reservoir filling and the performance
since then. The main points from both the predictions and the subsequent work are
outlined here.
The predictive analyses of the construction stage are of interest firstly in that they
compare predictions carried out independently using both different material models and
different finite elements, and secondly because they provide results for comparison
with the actual performance.
Figure 22 shows the meshes used for the LNEC and Swansea analyses and Figure
23 the settlement profiles on three vertical sections for the end of construction
predictions. It can be seen that the maximum settlement is near the middle of the
dam and is about 40cm. There is not a great difference between the results from
the two institutions.
~ CENTRAL CORE
_"'LTEII
c::J INNER SHEll
~ OuTlER SHELl
~ ALLUVIAL FOUNOArlON
11 13 IS - Inclinometer locations
Figure 22. Beliche dam - finite element meshes (after Naylor et at, 1986)
Back analyses based on the post- -construction settlement records show that the
original predictive analysis underestimated the stiffness slightly. Had premature
impounding not occurred, i.e. if constuction had been as assumed in the analyses, the
maximum settlement would have been about 60cm, i.e. some 50% higher than
predicted. The error is probably mainly accounted for by differences between the
pre-construction test samples from which the material parameters were obtained and
the actual fill material. Other factors are the numerical models themselves and
327
possibly some scale effect although this factor was minimised by the use of large scale
tests. The error due to the finite element discretisation would be minimal.
The analyses carried out after impounding when the deformation measurements were
available took into account the collapse settlement using the technique described in
Section 12.2 above. The analyses were quite complicated as they had to take into
account the collapse settlement in the upstream shell which occurred before the dam
had been built to its full height. The computed and measured settlements are
compared along settlement markers 11 and I3 in Figures 24 and 25 respectively. The
big step between the broken lines 3 and 4 in Figure 24 shows the contribution of the
collapse settlement to the total. No fill was added between these stages. It can be
seen that by taking collapse settlement into account quite good agreement with
the-end-of-impounding settlements could be obtained. This, however, does not take
into account the settlements since then which are due presumably to further
rheological effects. This is shown by the movements between MarchI April 1985 and
9th January, 1989.
- + - L.N.H
-0-- Swansea
-10 10 20 em 10 20 30 em 10 20 30 40 em
Horizontal Vertical Vertical
11 13
55,----,-----,----,-----,-----~--~
45 -"
40
"'\ \31 '85
st Jan.
\-<D
\
E
25
20
15
10
- Measured
- - - K-G model
5
(S)-- Analysis stage
O~--~----~-----L----------------~
o 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Settlement (mm)
55
50
45
40
35
5. 30
+-
.c.
CTI
iii 25
I
20
15
10
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Settlment (mm)
This 85m high rockfill dam comprises a soft clay central core between hard rockfill
shells. It was constructed between 1979 and 1982. It is unusual for such a high
dam to have so soft a core as placed (c u after placement averaging 17 kPa). This is
discussed by Knight el al (1982). It is comprehensively instrumented and has been
back analysed by the finite element method. These analyses are described by Knight
et al (1985) and Naylor et al (1988). The former of these provides an example of
probably the first published use of the known-pore-pressure-change technique. It also
models the fill as linear elastic. Highlights from the latter paper are presented here.
The 1988 paper differs from the 1985 one in two respects: a coupled consolidation
formulation incorporating the Biot theory was used thus making the calculation of pore
pressures deterministic, and an elasto-plastic soil model for the soft clay core was
introduced for comparison with the elastic. The elasto-plastic model was the
'continuous plasticity critical state model' (c.p.c.s.m.) described by Naylor (1985).
The analyses covered construction, impounding and one year of operation.
Comprehensive deformation, pore pressure and stress (horizontal and vertical)
measurements were available in the core at three elevations throughout this period.
The analyses were not therefore predictive except in so far as they extended the
measured data to other parts of the dam. The parameters (which included the
permeability of the core) were adjusted to give as good a fit as possible to the
measurements.
The finite element mesh is shown in Figure 26. Figure 27 compares the elastic
and c.p.c.s.m. computed settlements and piezometric elevations with the measurements.
Figures 28 and 29 compare the computed and measured vertical total stress and pore
pressures on a horizontal section near the base of the dam at, respectively, the end
of construction and about one year after reservoir filling.
These last two figures show the extent of internal load transfer. There is a large
transfer of stress from the soft clay core to the relatively stiff rockfill shells. In this
dam the rockfill was a very hard monzonite. The movements in it were much less
than those in the core. The chain-dotted lines indicating the overburden pressure are
based on the actual unit weights which for the core are some 75% of those for the
shells.
The vertical stress distribution across the core is of crucial interest. Safety against
hydraulic fracture will be assured if the effective stress components normal to a
potential fracture plane are compressive. The reservoir full condition is the critical
case. The results for it are given in Figure 29. The c.p.c.s.m. prediction is
reassuring in that it shows compressive effective stress across the full section whereas
the elastic analysis indicates near zero effective stress at the upstream edge of the
core. The core is, in fact, plastic so these results serve to illustrate the limitations
of elastic modelling which would appear to be misleading in this respect.
It can be seen from Figure 27 that the computed pore pressures agreed well with
the measured pore pressures until about the middle of impounding after which they
were underpredicted. The C.p.c.s.m. prediction is a little better than the elastic. A
reason for this is thought to be the ability of the c.p.c.s. model to simulate negative
dilatancy, i.e. shear induced excess pore pressure associated with a positive value of
the pore pressure parameter A. Elastic modelling cannot do this. Some of the pore
pressure rise in the latter stages of reservoir filling may be due to this factor. (One
cannot be certain because there are other factors which could cause the rise.)
331
~= El in metres
y I~------__~I 50
________ ~
100
________ ~
150
________ ~
200
________- L________- L______
250 300
~~.
metres
Figure 26. Monasavu dam - finite element mesh (after Naylor et al. 1988)
332
0
5. -0.5
04-
c::
E -10
~ -15
.....
Q.J
(/)
-2.0
4
Construction
~4 Impounding
.. 14 Operation
..
Computed a - EI 730 Measured El 730 Elas tic
b - EI 705 6 El 705 epes .m
c - EI 680 o El. 680
..
~-----
Construction Impounding
-------~~------------~~1~4r-~--------~
Operation
..
750
E 740
c::
.....ro 730
0
> 720
Q.J
W
710
700
Q.J
CL
Computed a - El 730
b - El 705
Measured
El 730 _ _ Elastic
!J El 705 - - - cpcs.m
c - El 680 o El 680
Figure 27. Monasavu dam - measured and back-analysed time v. settlement and
piezometric elevation
333
2000
Overburden (1ih)
V1
V1
eu
./
.......
.~
.....
L
V1
nJ 1000 "
.....u
L
stress
eu
>
o
100 150 200 m
Figure 28. Monasavu dam - end of construction total stress and pore pressure on
horizontal section at el. 680 (after Naylor, 1990)
334
2000
Overburden (1!h)
./,
ro
~
.J<:
VI
VI
QJ
.....VI'-
1000
ro
.....~
'-
QJ
>
Effective stress
o
100 150 200 m
Figure 29. Monasavu dam - after impounding total stress and pore pressure on
horizontal section at el. 680 (after Naylor, 1990)
335
References
Consider the placing of depth H Q of fill where H Q is the depth compnsIng a single
layer in the analyses but in reality is constructed in a large number, n, of sub-layers.
Let b represent the displacement of a typical point on the layer base. Referring to
Figure AI, let w = ')'HQ be the gravity loading intensity due to the weight of the
new layer, q be the pressure transmitted from the new layer to the underlying
material, and p = w-q. If the new layer has no bending resistance then q = wand
p = O. In general, p will not be zero, but its integral over the full area of the
layer base must be zero to satisfy equilibrium. p will esentially depend on the
flexural rigidity (EI) of the new layer. (The shear rigidity of the layer may also
make some contribution but, as in simple bending theory, this contribution will be
neglected. )
Restricting attention to linear elastic material, the object is to find an equivalent
flexural rigidity EI (with corresponding equivalent Young's modulus) for the analytical
new layer which will give the same displacement, 5, and pressure, q, on the layer
base (and therefore the same p) as would be produced in the actual case in which
the fill is built up in n sub-layers.
To do this consider an arbitary length along the layer, e.g. over the central part of
the embankment, as shown in Figure A2. Let the forces equal to the pressures
integrated over this length be denoted by capital letters, i.e. P. Q and W. and let p
be a measure of the average settlement. Let So be the vertical stiffness of the
underlying fill, and define a stiffness S by
S = Pip (AI)
S can be interpreted as the vertical stiffness of the chosen arbitrary length of layer
due to its flexural rigidity. It is assumed that S is proportional to the flexural
rigidity, EI, of the new layer. Denoting the value of S for the completed layer with
its stiffness unreduced by S' the stiffness when m out of n equal sub-layers have
been placed is then
'l~
I I~
I I
I
I
__ : I
"\J
vertical pressure distribution underlYing fill
Figure AI. Loading on new layer Figure A2. Forces on arbitrary length
33R
CA2)
This assumes equal layers with lin times the total load W applied to each of them.
During the placing of layer m let P increase by .1P m and p by .1Pm' Therefore
n
P = L Sm.1Pm CA3)
m=1
At this stage it is necessary to make an assumption about the rate of accumulation
of settlement as the new layer is built up. If the effect of the layer flexural rigidity
is relatively small, i.e. S < < So then P will be small so that the displacement is
almost entirely due to the weight of the new layer transferred directly on to the
underlying fill. Therefore
P = !!.
n
Introducing (A2)
pSI
n
P
f14 2: m3
m=1
On summing the series(i)
(AS)
f 5'/5 = 4 (A6)
n
4n
4
(i) 2: m3 (1+n)2
m=1
339
If the contribution of the flexural rigidity of the new layer is so large that it is
unreasonable to assume S < < So (or P < < W) then the rate of settlement will
vary as the layer is built up. When the first few sub-layers are placed the effect of
the flexural rigidity will be very small since EI is proportional to the cube of the
layer thickness (c.f. Equation A2). The effect will increase rapidly as the layer
approaches completion. In regions of the fill where sagging bending moment is
induced in the new layer (as in the centre of the fill of Figure AI) the increasing
flexural stiffness as the fill is built up will tend to inhibit fill settlement. Q will
become less than W, P will be positive. The initial displacement increments will then
be greater than the subsequent as illustrated by the curves S l ' S 2 of Figure A3.
Conversely if the bending moment is hogging P will be negative and the effect of the
flexural rigidity will be to increase the settlement. Curves such as HI' H 2 in Figure
A3 will then be followed.
To assess the effect of this the reduction factor is calculated making the assumption
that the settlement of the new layer case varies quadratically with the increasing fill
height in the new layer. This is achieved by expressing the settlement due to
sub-layer m as
A+ B m (A7)
n
A and B are constants for a particular curve. A family of curves of this type are
defined by setting
ap
A
n
and
2(I-a)p
B
l+n
"a" defines the particular curve, and has the values 0, L I, 3/2, 2 for the respective
curves H 2' HI' L, S l ' S 2' (nLn is the linear relation for which the reduction factor
of 4 has been derived.) it is readily shown that the summation of .1Pm for n
sub-layers is p for all "a" values.
Introducing Equation (A7) into (A3) now leads to
n
. 2(l-a)m
p
2 (~)3 5'
n n [a + l+n
m~1
n n
p5'a 2p5' (I-a)
fi4 2 m3 +
n 4 (I+n) 2 m4
m~1 m~1
n
(i ) n
2 m4 30
(l+n)(1+2n)(3n 2 +3n-l)
m~1
340
Pal (I-a) 1 3 1
pS' =4 (1 + n)2 + -1-5--- (2 + n)(3 + n - ~) (A8)
5'
f = S (A9)
Values of the reduction factor, f, corresponding to the five curves are marked on
Figure A3. Note that f = 4 is reproduced with a = 1. There is an upper limit on
"a" of 8/3 when the factor becomes infinite.
In conclusion it has been shown that reduction of the final (in situ) stiffness of
each analytical new layer by a factor centred on the value four will give a bending
stiffness for a single step application of gravity equivalent to that of a continuously
place fill. Linear elasticity has been assumed.
1D
hogging
fraction of
new layer
placed (minI
0.5
0.5 10
fraction of settlement, p
Figure A3. Effect of new layer bending made on development of displacement and
optimum load factor
CHAPT ER 13
CONCRETE FACE ROCKFILL DAMS
NELSON L. de S. PINTO
I. INTRODUCTION
'"
E. Maran~ daJ N~l'tJ (~d.J. Ad\'(J~tJ in Rodfrll Slr"CI ..r~J. 341-373.
CI 1991 KlllWtr Academic Publishers.
342
Sec t I on
~~
Longitudinal Section
<:#
(Trench) ~ A!>pholt
I 3A-m reQwoocl ELEVATION OF FACE /,
fdler and ~ CompreSSible
..)9 UCopper Jo,~' I,'ler
... Z wal.mop 13+(Nalurol)
@ ~I r-::. -.-i
,,' 1:5
I
...
~d:: 4
SECTION OF DAM
~.~/
- ... - -.--.,-~
li""'~"" (osdeterm"1edb~c~trcclor)
v",,,,, 1""--- ~mnwl'GHTAX"
@Hor,zontolconstrucllonja,nl - I I : !
: I ! :
[}owe,: I ~ f~:~~~ CD ~ 20r- ,I 0
Groutlone~ G:l -
As."" Concretl foce
rom",,.,
ELEVATION OF FACE Asphalt_pOInted
"IdIOio'
~(7,~< ~I@ ~
"" Woterslop,
HOrlZol'1lal ~"".,".tlberOrVInYI
cOl"l51ructlon Compocted or dumped \::::.J
jOint rock fill -<!I Verl,eol
""..../)<1 JOint
"I 40"
I--Dowel~
..... Grou! I,ne SECTION OF OA M
2.1. Evolution
~~~~+~-'T-~~- 5800
o ~O 100FT ,V / ~~~~~~-5650
A B
2.2. Embankment
slabs of the face, for the joints to be able to absorb the rockfill
settlement without undue leakage.
The deformation of the dam depends on its height and on the
modulus of deformation of the rockfill. The load is the result of the
dam weight and of the water pressure against the face. The resulting
settlement is essentially due to the rupture of the rock blocks at
their points of contact and rearrangement of the rock particles. Its
intensity is relatively high immediately following the application of
the load and reduces gradually with time. Total settlements can be
assumed proportional to the square of the dam height and inversely
proportional to the modulus of deformation. The modulus is higher, the
sounder and better graded the rock and smaller the resulting void ratio
of the compacted fill.
Deformations due to the weight of the rockfill occur mostly during
construction and have pratically no influence on the behavior of the
face. Ideally the concrete slabs are placed after completion of the
embankment and will be essentially influenced by the settlement due to
the water load. In high dams it may be practical to raise the concrete
face to an intermediate level prior to the completion of the fill. It
has been proven in several cases, that deformations of the embankment
due to the added weight of the upper reaches produce no harm to the
lower concrete face, basically because no hydraulic pressure acts on
the slabs which simply follow the movements of the fill.
The settlement due to water load depends mainly on the deformation
properties of the upstream portion of the dam. The downstream shell
complements the dam section but its influence on the movement of the
face is irrelevant. The zoning of the dam and respective compaction
requirements are consequently more rigid for the upstream third or half
of the dam section, (finer layers, better compaction). For the
downstream shell thicker layers and/or dumped rockfill are accepted.
The rockfill zoning of Foz do Areia dam is compared to the zone
designations for CFRD suggested by Barry Cooke and Sherard [6] in
Figure 3 and used as a reference to further comments on the role
and basic aspects of the different zones of the embankment.
calls for a finer (minus 7.5 cm) better graded material with sufficient
amount of sandsized particles to act as a filter to control eventual
leakage paths through cracks or joints, mostly near the abutments, and
to effectively act as a semi pervious upstream zone in case of
occasional floods during construction, prior to placing of the concrete
face,as illustrated by the material II-BB specified for the region of
the perimetric joint in Segredo dam under construction.
TABLE OF MATERIALS
MATERIAL ZONE METHOD OF PlACEMENT
IA IMPERVIOUS SOIL 38 qUAR,,?'( RUN AOCKFlll,
DUMPED ABOUT I m LAYERS
18 RAN DOM
3C QUARRY RUN ROCK FILL,
2 PROCESSED SMALL ROCK ABOUT 15 TO 20m LAYERS
1--_---+'-"-1"::::""::::"::::"::::"::::"::::'::::"::::"::::"::::"::::".l------
~T~~~~::~A I D COMPACTED1NOaOmLAYERS SELECTED SMALL ROCK
PLACED IN SAME LAYER
(s.:;~~~~~~~S:;:m'nl I E PL"'CEDF!OCK(~'Ixe) THICKNESS AS ZONE 2
WELL GFlAOED_MAX_SIZE 6" LIlYEAS _4 PASSES OF VIB ROlLUI
II B COMPACTED IN LMERS 040 m FACE -5 PASSESVIB ROLL(R(WWVe)
'"
1110 IN 030m L.o.Y(RS CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
A 8
200 40 10 4 6"
100 --' o
II II /1/ /
80
/ / / II I 20
II / I II
r / / _(2) /
l v 40 ~
1l2J-1'- e-.. II / 1/
'" 60
~
t>Z
c a
II o
u
~
o 40 / N / ~ I------ V cf!.
7 II
60
0.02
v-
0.06 0.1
---
0.2
I----- ~
0.6
-f--
2
Diameter of particle in mm
v
6 10 20 60 100
100
200
/ /
80 --,I / / 20
G: i / /
[7
60 /-- ~ ;---.... / 40 ~
l.
J I------ J
~
'" I2
\,~
/ o
o
cf2
/ /
60
/
V
-
l--' /
./
,-- .-I- 1-'--
20 80
.- ~ 1-1--- \---V V
V
-
f--
!- ,-f---
o
0.06 0.1 0.2 0.6 2 6 10 ----
20 60 100 200 600
100
1000
Diameter of particle in mm
2.2.5. Fill cross section - For the dumped CFRDs, face slopes at the
natural angle of repose of rockfill were accepted with no questioning
of their stability. There is no reason to change that practice in
compacted dams. An average slope of 1.3H:1V is generally used for most
dams, while a 1.4H:IV slope is justified for dam heights above 120 m.
A 1.3H:IV slope corresponds to a safety factor greater than 1.5 for a
o = 50 0 rockfill based on the infinite slope method. The flatter slope
for very high dams recognizes the lowering of the friction angle as
normal pressures increase, as pointed out by Leps [8]. Somewhat flatter
slopes (1.5:1 to 1.6:1) result for gravel fills. Berms or roads in the
349
2.3. Plinth
The plinth or toe slab is at a time a grout cap for the grout curtain
of the dam and a watertight articulated connection of the face to the
foundation.
Classical design is a thin reinforced concrete slab, dowelled to
the rock as illustrated in Figure 6. The plinth is adapted to the
topography of the site in straight continuous stretches without joints
but for construction joints with reinforcement passing through, spaced
at the convenience of the contractor. For good non erodible foundations,
the cross section length is generally made to be from 1/10 to at least
1/20 of the hydraulic load. Thickness may be the same or less than for
the face slab and reinforcement is minimum temperature steel. On steep
abutments, it can be designed as nearly vertical walls anchored against
the rock to minimize excavation. At Foz do Areia and Segredo dams, the
plinth foundation was designed as a road, sometimes deeply excavated in
the more steeper abutments, with horizontal generatrix normal to the
perimetric joint. The resulting larger excavation is compensated by
advantages of a better control over rockfill thickness under the
perimetric joint, a more straighforward concreting scheme, and greater
facility for moving the crawler mounted drilling equipment and for
drilling the grout holes. Somewhat high plinth sections may result from
abrupt changes in the slope of the abutment. In those cases the
structure has to be checked for stability taking in account the
unfavorable conditions of high horizontal and uplift pressures.
TRANSVERSE JOINT
PERIMETR1C JOINT
A - A
FOUNDED ON COMPETENT ROCK
(Foundation type I)
~~~>;='i==n~M--=:\ I _(~
"~:N~ii
ZONE 2/ I
Grouting is carried out along the plinth, outside the rockfill body,
and in no way interferes with the construction of the dam. It can be
performed meticulously without affecting the overall schedule which is
a very important feature. A high hydraulic gradient resulting from the
short width of the plinth and the lack of dam weight directly above the
grout curtain recommend a careful grouting program.
The toe slab functions as a very effective grout cap dowelled tothe
rock. Upstage packer method is usually employed. Two rows for shallow
treatment upstream and downstream of the curtain line and a deep central
curtain grout make up a common and adequate scheme. The consolidation
shallower treatment should be regarded as an important item, as it
checks the fissures in the more critical high hydraulic gradient
foundation area.
351
2.4.4. Joints - Vertical joints normal to the axis of the dam are cold
joints, spaced at 12.0 to 18.0 m, in general. The spacing of the
joints is related to the dimensions of the formworks for the generally
slipformed face construction. Wider slabs result is less joints but in
heavier and more cumbersome formworks. A joint spacing of 16.0 m as
adopted in Foz do Areia was a good compromise and proved quite practical.
Vertical joints are made to end normal to the perimetric joint,
particularly in steep abutments, to avoid sharp angles at the end of
the slabs.
Horizontal joints have been totally eliminated. Construction joints
when needed are treated as such, with reinforcement passing through
and no waterstops.
Cethana H=110 M
E=1l2 to 185 MPa 11 7
A 8
A B
well constitute the main water barrier in this most critical region.
Certainly, a soil type material, preferably a silty-sand material as
illustrated by sand (3) in Figure 4, will have an effective sealing
effect on possible cracks and openings, if well backed up by a proper
filter underneath the slab. Such is the idea behind the proposed
perimetric joint concept [11], illustrated in Figure 12.
-6.00 ,
B.OO
EL.749.DO:Min.) r EL.1IS2.00 t t
I F==t===i1
EL.IISI.SO
CREST DETAIL
A B
3. CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
3. 1. Embankment
The rock from the quarry or from required excavation is brought to the
embankment by end dump off-road trucks, spreaded by dozers, and compacted
by smooth drum vibratory rollers. For sound rock, the material is
dumped on the layer being compacted and spreaded, to advance over the
previous layer, as illustrated in Figure 14. A degree of segregation
is typical of this process and is accepted as a normal feature of the
rockfill. The lower more permeable layer is formed by larger blocks,
and the denser better graded top zone smoothed by the vibratory roller
results in a favorable surface for the traffic of the construction
equipment.
For weak rocks, the dumping can be made directly over the
preceding layer, reSUlting in less segregation and better overall
density.
Water at a ratio of 0.15 to 0.25 of the rock volume should reduce
the resistance of the rock to breakage and result in a higher degree of
compaction. It is generally required for the 3B zone. Water ulay not
be specified for the downstream, 3C shell, as no major concern exists
over the resulting deformability of the embankment. High pressure
monitors are not needed as the aim is simply wetting the material and
not moving the rock fragments.
Compaction by four passes of a 10 ton smooth drum vibratory roller
is standard. Particular conditions may recommend a larger roller or
additional number of passes.
Construction joints within the embankment are a frequent feature
of CFRDs and one of their great assets as far as construction logistics
is concerned. Both longitudinal or transversal joints at a natural
1.3H:IV slope are acceptable anywhere in the body of the dam, except for
357
the first 20.0 to 30.0 m downstream from the face, where specifications
should require construction in horizontal layers well placed and
compacted. Construction roads and ramps within the rockfill, with
slopes up to 18%, as well as a permanent road along the downstream face
of the dam are frequently used for hauling of the rock, Figures 15 and
16.
figure lb. Segredo Dam - Construction joints and roads in the rockfill
359
Construction of the toe slab precedes any concrete work and its early
execution accomplishes two basic objectives: it disciplines the rockfill
construction by clearly defining its upstream limits, and it liberates
the grouting works which can proceed in parallel to the embankment
construction, Figure 18.
360
Figure 18. Plinth at the deeper section - Segredo Dam, transition zone
and rockfill under construction.
HIDRAULIC JACKS
3400
1600
DIMENSIONS
IN mm
CONCRETE '..----RAIL
SUR FACE
16000
""
CONCRETE PAD CONCRETE SLAB CONCRETE PAD
LATERAL WOOD FORM FINISHED SLAB
The slab volume was about 12.5% larger than the theoretical design
volume, representin~ an average increment of 7 cm in the thickness of
the entire face. Such a small overthickness was due to the special care
taken in the surface finishing of the transition material, and to the
technique of using the forms according to the actual rockfill profile,
instead of the 1.4:1 theoretical slope.
Figure 24. Xingo first phase dam construction encroaches in the river
channel. Flow conditions tested in a 1:100 hydraulic model, CEHPAR
laboratory, Curitiba, Brazil.
In Xingo dam, where closure of the river will involve dealing with
daily peaks of 2,000 to 4,000 m3 /s, and total head differences of 10 to
12 m, three simultaneously built end-dumped dikes are being planned. A
central dike, along the axis of the dam,will greatly facilitate the
closure operation,remaining as part of the permanent dam. By concen-
trating the head difference in the central dike, the closure along the
downstream cofferdam will face a lower head difference avoiding the use
of very large blocks and/or the dragging of the rockfill material,
facilitating the subsequent sealing of the cofferdam.
366
Figure 25. Foz do Areia Dam - Equal settlement curves before reservoir
filling (cm).
DEFLECTION (em)
CR 05/80 06/80 07/80 08/80 11/80 10/82 03/84-85
.. .. .. ... ... ..
1-21 2 1.8 27.7 44.0 47.4 50.1 52.5 52.5
7-27 22.8 30.9 55.8 6 1.4 64.8 68. I 70.0
13-33 12.6 2 0.7 5 O. 4 6 1.2 69.2 72.8 77.5
18-38 - i 8. 7 35.6 47.0 56.6 62. I 68.9
\v.L. 702.50 714 .00 73 5.80 739.50 739.00 742 .00 743.60
where confining stresses due to the weight are relatively low. Research
and field measurements are certainly needed for a better understanding
of the deformation pattern, but their results should not change the
practical conclusion that to minimize joint movements and leakage
problems, special care in compaction works is particularly required in
the upstream third of the dam section.
The response to water load in Areia was fast and creep along the
years nominal. The maximum slab deformation reached 70 cm six months
after reservoir filling and increased to about 78 cm after four years,
to become stable thereafter. The behavior of other dams, particularly
in narrower valleys like Cethana in Australia, have shown a lower rate
of deformation immediately after reservoir filling, while creeping,
which seems related to the release of the arch action in the valley
walls, is felt for a longer time. Deformation was 11.8 em seven months
after the reservoir had filled and increased gradually to 14.0 cm after
nine years [17].
Maximum deformations of the face can be nominal in gravel dams like
the 145 m high Salvajina dam (12 cm), or in well graded sound rockfill
such as in Cethana dam (14 cm) or of the order of 80 cm as in Foz do
Areia, without any harmful effect to the slab, basically because the
concrete structure rests freely on the rockfill, the deformation is
gradual, and the ratio deformation to slab-length is always very small.
The resulting joint movements, particularly along the perimetric joint,
are the main concern, because leakage may occur if the waterstop barrier
is damaged.
Vertical joints tend to open near the abutments. In Foz do Areia,
six vertical joints at each side, of a total of 50 vertical joints, have
opened a maximum of 3.0 cm. Total opening for all joints added up to
14.0 em, 1.2 cm in average. In the perimetric joint settlement normally
prevails over the two other components of the joint movement. Maximum
settlement values of 55 mm and 23 mm were measured in Foz do Areia and
Salvajina dams respectively, while openings reached 23 rom and 10 mm, and
tangential movements were 25 rom and 16 rom respectively. The perimetric
joint details were similar, and behaved adequately. Leakage in Foz do
Areia peaked at 240 lis diminishing to a stable flow of about 50 lis
after four years. Salvajina dam reported a maximum nominal leakage of
60 lis with a clear tendency to decrease also.
As the membrane follows the rockfil1 movement, it is dragged
towards the center of the dam and placed under compression, except for
the upper zone and along the plinth, as shown in Figure 27.
Slab strains have been measured at mid height of the slab and have
not indicated torsion or flexion stresses possible to occur at the
proximity of steep valley walls. In Segredo dam, strain-gages are being
installed at both sides of the central reinforcing mesh in an attempt
to detect such anomalies in the strain distribution picture.
B
Figure 27. Equal strain curves (x 10- 6 ) at the concrete face - Foz do
Areia Dam [14].
A - In the slope direction B - In the horizontal direction
5.0
(1524)
L I, 943 E~RTHQlJA~E J. I I 971 ' EARTHciuAKE 1965 bRTHQUAKE
I
I 965 EARTHQUAKE
<f)
ffi 4.0
f- (1219 )
W
-- -
~
:::;
~ 3.0 ~
r-
(914 )
f-
W
W
I"'V ~ .....
..... ---
u.. .....
!,'; 2.0
..... .--
(610) ,/
I-
Z ,/
w
~
J"
~
1.0
(305)
~
f
<f)
o
'"0>
OJ OJ OJ
'"0> OJ
'"
0>
<Xl
0>
YEARS
D = 7 (M - 4.5)1.5
the product
where PGA is the peak ground acceleration, was defined as the earthquake
severity index, to which earthquake induced deformations in rockfill
dams were correlated as shown in Figure 29.
The observed values in Figure 29 refer either to a dumped CFRD as
Cogoti or to earth core rockfill dams, such as La Villita and Infernillo
dams, more deformable than compacted CFRDs. Although such correlation
curve as pointed out by its author should not be used for predicting
settlements for new or existing dams, they support Sherard and Barry
Cooke's conclusion that "for the great majority of sites which may be
very strongly shaken such as near the epicenter of a Magnitude 7.5
quake, or at sites with calculated Earthquake Severity Index in the
general range of 10-15, the same CFRD design can be used as in non-
seismic areas. For these sites, all present experience with dam
behavior and the overall results of current dynamic calculations give
confidence that the worst earthquake-induced crest settlement will be
substantially less than 1% of the dam height. A sudden crest
settlement of 1% of the dam height will not treaten the safety of a
modern CFRD" [6].
371
Observed /
Computed
~ La Villito Dam
\l El lnfiernillo Dom
ESTIMATED
oIO.O-~----~A~V~EA~G~E~RE~L~A~T~IO~N~SH~I~P~~--~----t
Q'!.
I-
Z
W
:::>
w
--'
I-
hi
<f)
<i I.O--lf-------+--_=_
u
i=
a::
I~I
w OBSERVED
> AVERAGE RELATIONSHIP
w
>
~
--'
w
a::
O.I-+-----e..---,,,L--+------+------t
ROCKFI LL DAMS
l<EFERENCES
I. Introduction
Fill dams (or embankment dams) were the first dams built by
man, they are the most nllmerous and the most frequently chosen
when it is a question of constructing a new dam. According to
Penman (1986), in 1985 statistics showed that over 80% of the
large dams (higher than 15 m) constructed in the world were
earth dams. Nowadays that figure is certainly higher. And it
must be added that the highest uams in the world are also fill
dams.
A type of fill dam that has become very c ommon is t h e
rockfill dam with a central core. This ,;olLltj.on is due to a
desire for optimization in th~ us e of available natural
materials by placing them in the best zones of the dam body.
I n the forties, there began to be c0nstruc ted works of this
type , a n d their conception has owed a lot to the great
progress made in soil mechanics, whi c h has been concerned
mainly with shear strength and filter s . In the last 20 years,
and as result of problems arising as regards cracking i n
cores, especially hydraulic fracturing, important studies have
been carried out on the conception of these works, and in them
have been incorporated some of the more important advances in
soil mechanics, namely regarding stress-strain - strength rela-
tions, seepage in foundation ground and in fills as well as
filtering and drainage phenomena .
Nowadays earth - rockfill dams, both with central core and
with sloping core, have reached un precedent heights (300 m in
the Nurek Dam and 335 in the Rogun Dam, both in the USSR), and
constitute one of the most frequent solutions in the domain of
fill dams. It seems that stabili ty problems do not arise and
capacity for mastering the questions connected with defor-
mability has been substantially improved si n ce the sixties ,
with introduction of the tec hnology of compacting rockfill by
using vibratory rollers.
'"
E. Moronho dos N~I'~S (~d.J, Ad,'onus in Rod.fil/ SlruClltr~s. 375-447.
e 1991 Kluwf'r Acodf'mic Publishers.
376
r" 1 iNFtERNiLLO
DAM CCXJNTRY
MEXICO
COMPLETED
I'
1963
L/H
1m)
344/148=2.3
CORE
POSITION
VERT I CAL
SLENDERNESS
INDEX
(B/Hw)
0.26
LONG J TUD] NAL
AX IS
STRAIGHT
',2 CARACOl MEX ICO 1985 360/126"2.9 VERT! CAL 0.56 STRAIGHT
Table 1 (Cont.)
ROCKFllL CORl
NO DA" SEISMIC
MATERIAL COMPACT ION MATERIAL WATER FOUNDATION ACT IONS
TECHNIQUE CONH.NT
3 SCAMMONDEN SANDSTONE VIBRATORY ROLLER CLAY \.j! TH +rt, TO +20% SANDSTONE SHALE
SHALES NO
" BELICHE SCHIST; GREYIJACKE VIBRATORY ROLLER CLAY - 1% TO +2% ALLUVIA; SCHIST;
GRFYWACKE YES
-l2~_O.OO
0 SOm
t===t
8 -IMPERVIOUS CORE (i)-DUMPED ROCKFILl
o -FILTERS 0- RIPRAP
SOm
I
" ~6'i50
--"'---
"
- 1,
- CLAY CORE
- ROCKFILL
. 5~2 0.9
_ _ ---=t::::.
-~~ -
2B
3C
o
=
SOm
@- TRANSITIONS @- RIPRAP
o
=
100m
(~) -CLAYE"Y SOIL "
i I. i-OUMPED
~
ROCKFILL
90350
o SOm
L===:t:===---t
,G~ - CLAY MATERIAL I WET SIDE) 8- UNIFORM ROCKFILL 115'" d n ..: 25 em) 0- COFFERDAM
529_00
~-
o 'SOm
t==t==t
0- FILTERS
'"
"
50 m
3. 3A ,-2
Sam
I
(0 - CLAY CORE 0-
ROCKF1LL
o 50 m
t====
0-FILTER (i)-ALLUVIUM
=
o 30 m
'561,00
5B 5C
\
~,~"c_~-_~_c __ e,~_-,-c,-,~--~
50 m
1:====11
.~
'~) - CLAY CORE - SMALL ROCK FILTER ZONE -ROCKFllL (LARGER SIZES)
,8, - FINE FILTER ZONE - ROCKFlll (SMALLER SIZES) ~) - ALLUVIUM (SAND,GRAVEl,AND BOULDERS)
G COARSE FILTER ZONE -ROCKF1LL (INTERMEDIATE SIZES) 0-0UMPED ROCKFILl ID m1n 12m)
z!!\i
Him}
f
.
Hw
280
7 }
~B-;
- vertical core
0- sloping core
200
8 4
CD CD
5
6 CD
12
CD -10
120
9
3 CD
40
CD
11
.
O~------~------~------r-----~
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
SI Hw
-- ---,
, 1.6
--2
1.4
,
- - SCAMMONDEN
,r:;2
/
N~ OF
DAMS
90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 50 45
a (DEGREES)
50m
i==I===Io1
o 50 m
I I
As may be seen from Fig. 19, there are no zones with concen-
tration of stresses, which are distributed gradually and
homogeneously throughout the dam body. The considerations
refer to a transverse cross section of the dam and assume a
plane strain situation. But they are also applicable to a
longitudinal cross section of the dam or to its tridimensional
behaviour.
But the reality is that not only permeability, but also
deformability and strength are not, in the natural compacted
particulate media used to construct dams, independent proper-
ties. This means that in order to ensure a sufficiently
impermeable core, it is impossible to make it resemble the
stabilizing shells (or the filters), from a deformability
point of view. As regards strength, on the other hand, it is
well known that, to put it in a very simplified way, it varies
in the same sense as deformabili ty , i. e. a material with
greater rigidity generally has a correspondingly greater
strength.
Fig. 20 shows the distribution of vertical stresses in the
above mentioned dam, this time in the hypothesis of the
properties of the materials in the varlOUS zones being
different as regards deformability and shear strength. The
respective values are presented in Table 3 in section 4. It
will be noted that there is a concentration of vertical
stresses in the rockfill shells that is due to a transfer
originating in the core (more deformable than the shells).
The filters or transition zones of granular materials are
also frequently zones of concentration of stresses. Recently
it has, in fact, been recommended that the compactness to be
required for them must not be very high (relative density of
397
not over about 70%), since this has little influence on the
respective filtering and draining characteristics but may
decrease rigidity in order to improve substantially structural
behaviour. strength diminishes, but in fact this is not very
important. One drawback that is sometimes pointed out is that,
in the hypothesis of seismic action, medianly compacted
filters may generate positive pore pressures owing to negative
dilatancy. Except in very special cases, this does not seem to
be a matter with practical repercussions.
Fig. 20 also shows the concentration of stresses in the
fil ters.
It is obvious that since the examples presented are based on
calculations, their value depends on the reliability of the
calculation model and on the values attributed to the princi-
pal parameters of that model. As an example, it may be
mentioned that in the calculation, no displacements are
allowed between the different zones of the fill, but if they
were, the results might be different, as is the case of the
Niikappu Dam in Japan (Mikuni, 198Gb). Fig. 21 shows the
distribution of the safety factors (relationship between
available strength and mobilized strength) after the filling
of the reservoir, in the hypothesis of there being no dis-
placements (Fig. 21a) and in the case of displacements being
permitted in the interfaces of the various zones (Fig. 21b).
It will be seen that when deformations are allowed along
the interfaces, there is a favourable change in the safety
factors. Deviatoric strains occur in the vicinity of the
separation between zones, and such deformations increase the
stability of the body of the dam.
,0
aI
bl
,
construct Ion
INFIERNILlO
" " >1 <1 after 10 years
AKOSOMBO ~1 >1
'0 L04 ~, ~,
511 50
-~--
o50rn
~
~ ,
-LOW QUALITY ROCKFILL {COMPACTED WITH D8) t 6 - SOUND ROCKFIlL (COHPACTED BY VIBRATION)
ROCK
place between June 1986 and May 1989, when the water level in
the reservoir rose from half height to maximum height (LNEC,
1989) .
An interesting aspect from the point of view of conception
is the use of a clay blanket prolonged downstream, at the base
of the inclined core (v. de Mello, 1983) and exemplified in
404
following:
For a soil that can induce high pore water pressures during
construction, it is normal for Ko to assume very high values
(close to unity), so that 0h would not differ greatly from 0v.
In the quantification of r u' 0v is taken to be practically
equal to the overburden pressure, which means that there is no
transfer of stresses to the rockfill masses. This hypothesis
may not occur for cores of soils with moderate to high shear
strength, so that the consequent diminution of 0v implies also
a diminution of ru. This means that the reductions in pore
pressures so often observed during construction may be mainly
due to a transfer of stresses to the stabilizing shells and
not to a hydrodynamic consolidation. The shear strength of the
core material must therefore not be very high in order to
ensure a very deformable core, likely to develop at the
interfaces with the foundation (including abutments), with the
stabilizing shells and on any plane that intercepts it, total
stresses always higher than the pressure in the water due to
the reservoir. In this situation, the horizontal stresses
applied by the core on the upstream (and downstream) stabiliz-
ing shells must be higher than those of the water in the
reservoir on the core. Accordingly, the pressure of the core
on the downstream shell does not undergo any appreciable
alteration and, during filling of the reservoir, there are no
displacements of the core downstream.
According to Penman and Charles (1973), this was the
behaviour observed at Scamrnonden Dam.
From what has been said, it may be concluded that a good
structural solution is that which results from the combination
of a very deformable core, low shear strength and developing
high pore pressures during construction (which ensures
watertightness of the body of the dam and prevents hydraulic
cracking problems) with very steep compacted rockfill masses
(which will ensure stability as regards failure by sliding in
the body of the dam). It will be a safe and economical
solution as regards the overall cost of the materials to be
placed (Fig. 26).
This solution has, however, certain drawbacks, one of which
is due to the effect of time (Sherard, 1985). During the life
of the structure, the initial water content may be modified.
If the operation system includes situations of filling after
fairly prolonged periods with the reservoir at a very low
storage level, during that filling hydraulic cracking may
occur.
Sherard (op. cit.) even points the case of Messaure Dam,
already referred to, in which, after the first filling, there
were considerable concentrated seepage through the core
causing its erosion. It was concluded that the unsatisfactory
behaviour was due to arch effects that were generated in the
core, that is to say, even a compacted glacial alluvia (till)
with high water content may transfer stresses.
40X
1.5
1
LB RB
w
150.00
o 50 100 m
-=-; I I I
oj
~wm
.~Z2/'z;Z;Z;VZl
..z>2J22WaU2J
~
mm z
I-J ~
100 a..
~ 8~6.50' 877.3~
<J) ,
0 ./
- -=~.J,;~r500
I. I_COMPRESSIVE STRAINS
a 100 m
~
In some cases, the soil of the core has been placed with
high water content in those zones where tensile stresses are
expected develop, as is the case with Sklope Dam, built in
1967 in Yugoslavia, reported by Sherard (1973) and repre-
sented in Fig. 30. A reinforcement consisting of a geomesh of
polymer material can be used, as is the case with Canales Dam,
built in 1986 in Spain (Guillen Bravo et al., 1988).
About 20 years ago some interesting investigations were
carried out in order to establish a correlation between the
type of soil and the potential of dams for transverse cracking
412
o 20m
~
Crest. 596
Transverse crack
o 15 m
I I
out into the surrounding dam core (to increase the seepage
path) must be given up. The surfaces must be smooth and sloped
slightly off vertical (slopes about IH:IOV) so that the earth
can be compacted directly against the concrete by a rubber-
tired vehicle running parallel with the concrete face, which
needs not to be sandblasted, chipped, painted or treated in
any way.
By similar reasons seepage collars of concrete on conduits
passing under the core (also a standard practice) are of no
use.
Nevertheless a special care is recommended on the above
mentioned situations: all potential leakage water travelling
along the concrete-core interface must exit through a filter.
Thus any internal erosion will be controlled.
The reasons for all these changes is that observed behaviour
shown that the inconvenients of bad compaction inherent to the
complicated geometry of the interfaces are higher than the
disadvantages of having lower seepage paths.
What has been stated above gives some account of the develop-
ments in the conception of earth-rockfill dams, and thus tries
to make current recommendations on the conception of this kind
of work clearer and better founded.
Given below are the most significant aspects of conception,
related with geometry, deformability and seepage, with the aim
of good static structural behaviour of earth-rockfill dams.
'.
y c H I PER B 0 L I C PARAMETERS
,
Y sat
MATER] Al
k~/m3 kN/m 3 kN/m Z degrees k n Rf G f d kur
,. CLAY 21.7 77 20.1 180 0.65 0.90 0.40 0.10 2.1 1080
2- SAND AND 17.9 , 47.0 1500 0.15 0.87 0.35 0.41 10.6 9000 12.5
GRAVEL
280
H 7
D
1m)
240
9
80 3;
@)
11
0
40
EV (%)
120.00
~
o 50 m
I (
o 50 m
I I
1000
o 50 m
I I
1000
o 50 m
t=====i
a) b)
750
1250
1000
c) d)
a 50 m
I I
Fig. 40 shows the cross section of the Belimo II dam which has
a sloping core. Materials are the same as those used in Belimo
I dam.
! 2000
-~-
o 50 m
I I
1000
50 m
1
1250~ _ _-
250
50m
1===1==1
All the studies described above were carried out on dams 120
m high. For an ideal frictional material these results could
be used for dams of different height because the distribution
of stresses and strains would be the same only on a different
scale. Concerning stress levels (a measure of the degree of
mobilization of the shear strength, i.e., the ratio between
the installed and the maximum available shear strengths) the
results would be equal independently of the dam height.
Since real materials are very different from these ideal
soils, dam height has an important role in the stress-strain
425
0) H .30m
0.2
15m
i==t==:=il
b) H 60 m
0.4
0.4
o 60 m
~
Fig. 44 shows the stress levels in the dam with 120 m height
after impounding. When compared with Fig. 4 3c, shows the
interesting change of stress levels in the dam body mainly in
the upstream part where collapse played certainly an important
role.
These results emphasise the difference in the behaviour of
dams of different heights. This analysis deserves more
attention because the occurrence of failure zones by no means
implies less safety regarding ultimate limit states such as
failure due to piping in the core for instance. And it is well
known in the profession that small dams have specific problems
and specific solutions for dealing with such problems.
0.8 0.95
50 m
i=====tl
4.4. DEFORMATIONS
o 50 m
I I
SCm
t:==t==1 - .1.00 m
1.8
Q2
10 14
Mv x 101. IkNfm2)
LOA 0
Safety
margin
Allowable deformation
DEFORMATION
O+-~--~----~I--~--~--~I--~----
10-2 10-4 10-6
PROBABILITY OF FAILURE
a)
'>
z
factor = 1.5
'" Safoty
03
~ 10 tests
ex
~
0'
u.
0
iw
01
u
u.
u.
w
0
u 0
10~2 1cr 6
PRO BABILITY OF FAI LURE
b)
it is necessary to consider:
,--------- - ----------,
R
---'
C
5.5.1. Linear Elastic Model. The dam has only two zones
(shells and core) and the elastic constants used will be the
Young modulus (E) and the Poisson coefficient (V). The values
adopted for E and V are:
800 800
a) b)
1-----..\ 6 00
c) d)
50 m
t:::===='
Figure 51. Linear elastic materials. Minimum principal
stresses ( 3 ), at the end of construction
a) "1M 1.0 b) y,~ 1.2 (E, and E 2 )
d) Y~I
437
1/
[ I
Y", --
ELASTIC EL NONLINEAR
t!
I
l
E V K Kur
~=+~
1 1
~- 1,4
1
1
1.4 - - ./
~~~~ I /
-
- - 1 I 1
I -
I - 1.4 1 1,4 ,/'
./ /
// .'
/> /
......
,.'
~.=-
.,'
~
.
....... ;b--
~/ ..
....,...,..-- --
y // //
/' . /
.... ~. ~ -+
v y
~~
50 100
Him)
K =
43S
600 600
800 800 800
1000 1000 1000
a) b) c)
0 50 m
I I
0.8 08
0) b) c)
o 50m
L=====t
6. Conclusions
Acknowledgements
P..EFERENCES
1. Introduction
It is usually well recognized that earth and rockfill dams can be constructed on even softer
foundation compared with concrete dams. In the earthquake regions there have been
reponed many examples of disastrous raptures of earth dams on soft foundat ion
conditions. Most failures were caused by slope failure induced by seismic ground motion.
The loss of freeboard due to com paction of dam materials and consolidation of the
foundation were also major causes of the overtopping of dams. The possible ways in
which an earthquake may cause the fai lure of an e anh dam proposed by RB .Seed are as
listed in Table l.
Tecton ic ground movement and fault movement are of course problems of prim ary
importance for dam e ngineering. Piping failures and o vertopping due to seiches in
reservoir are al so of great importance in evaluating the safety of earth and rockfill dam s.
However in design practices we usually focus our attention on the problems of the stability
of slopes during severe vibrations. In this text we wDuld like to limit our problems to those
which concern the effec ts of vibration on a dam body, and we will not go further into the
problems of seism ic source mechanism and input earthquake waves.
The response of fil l dams to incident seism ic waves will be affected by the shape of
valley, the stiffness of foundation and mechanical characteristics of embankment materials.
Although there are a lot of examples of failure of earlh dams during eanhq uakes,
.,
fo rtunatel y very few cases of seve re damage to roe kfill dams have been
reported so far, and therefore it is already well recognized that rockfiII dam is
more resistant to earthquake than earth dam. However there are a lot of arguments
concerning the safety of rockfill dams against earthquakes, since the failure of a high dam
is undoubtedly a catastrophe to downstream inhabitants. In order to improve the
construction technique of earthquake resistant structures and to enhance earthquake
resistant design methods, it is necessary to determine the mechanical properties of fill
materials and investigate the seismic response behavior of rockfill dams.
In the seismic regions there were a lot of serious cases of failure of soil structures and
natural slopes due to strong shakings. Most soil structures such as levees, reclamation
dikes, and highway embankments often suffered severe damage because of strong
earthquakes. Slides in slopes and cracks in the crest are often found in embankments which
have been built on relatively weak foundations. Concerning to earth and rockfill dams
there have been reported a large number of small earth dams damaged during strong
shakings. During The Oga Earthquake of 1939, more than 50 small irrigation dams were
reported to have been damaged by the earthquake and 12 cases among them were complete
dam failures (Akiba, 1939). Most of the failures occurred a few hours or up to one day
after the earthquake. During The Tokachioki Earthquake of 1968, 29 small earth dams
among 94 dams for irrigation purposes were damaged in Aomori Prefecture and 7 among
them were destroyed by the shaking. the damaged dams are concentrated in a region where
strong rainfall had been observed prior to the earthquake (Shibata et aI, 1971). This rainfall
apparently amplified the damage to soil structures.
There are some examples of earthquake damage to well constructed rolled fill dams in
Japan. Ainono Dam, a uniform type earth dam with a height of 40.8m, was shaken by a
local earthquake with a magnitude of 5.8 in 1973. Longitudinal cracks with a width of 8 to
25cm were found on the crest, the backfill of a stone wall on the crest subsided by 25cm
and a lighting pole was inclined by the subsidence. The Makio Rockfill Dam, a center core
type dam of 104.5m in height and 260.0m in length, suffered damage in the Naganokenn-
Seibu Earthquake of a magnitude 6.8, September 14, 1984. Longitudinal cracks were seen
on the crest up to the depth of 1.5m and also on the down stream slope cracks and a
settlement of 30 to 40cm were seen. Strong motion seismometers were installed in the
dam, but unfortunately due to stoppage of electric power seismic records could not be
obtained.
In Table 2 the maximum acceleration values ever observed at fill dams are listed. The
Morgan Hill Earthquake shook Coyote Dam in 1984. The maximum acceleration recorded
on the crest was 1.29g in transverse direction, 0.9g in longitudinal direction and O.4g in
updown direction. Despite the large acceleration only slight damage was found in the dam
body. According to the investigation made after the earthquake, three major cracks were
found in the upstream slope, along the crest and near the concrete spillway section. The
crest subsided by 6.7cm and was displaced horizontally by 3.7cm in the downstream
direction. These cracks seemed to have been formed by the displacement of the surface
rockfill mass of the slope. After a careful investigation it was concluded that the cracks do
not have any significant effect on the safety of the dam.
During the Mexico Earthquake of 1985, two major rockfill dams were reported to have
been damaged. La Villita Dam, a center core type rockfill dam, with a height of 59.7m and
a length of 420m was shaken so much that it cracked on the crest. The maximum
451
acceleration observed at the crest of the dam was 0.45g in transverse direction. The dam
crest subsided by Ilcm at the middle point of the dam axis and horizontal displacement
was also found to be l5.4cm in the upstream direction. Two major continuous cracks were
seen intermittently on the both sides of the crest. The upsream side crack has a length of
80m and width of 0.5 to Scm, whereas the downstream crack was 130m long and 5 to
l5cm wide. The cracks are located on the extension of the core slope lines. El Infiemillo
Dam is a 148m high rockfill dam, which has steep slopes with a ratio of 1:1.75. There was
found approximately IOem of subsidence in the middle point of the crest and also two lines
of long cracks were seen on both sides of the crest, which may affect the safety of the core
and stability of the dam.
037 TR (racks
Nagar a 035 LU
off~Chlba
HOrl? Disp 2 Orr
Earth 29km
II o 52m 1987 SubSidence 3 Om
033 LJD
Naganurr; a [acth
o I ~ TR Local
lI o Sm Test rill
o 13 LN 20km No Damage
023 UD 1988
Cracks,
[iinfiernilio 034 TR MeXICO
W2~ 150mm
Rock[ III 62kC"
H= 146m (Middle of Slope) 1985
SubSidence 11.3cm
La V 1IIIta Cracks,W5-150mm
Mexico
Rockflll 0,45 TR - Subsidence 20cm,
H=60m 1985
Parapet Wa II
0,45 TR Cracks,
0,34 LN Lorna Prieta Horlz, DISP 7,4cm
Lex Inton Earth 6km
0,20 UD 1969 Subsidence 27cm
Recent cases of damage to earth and rockfill dams due to an earthquake took place
during the Lorna Prieta Earthquake of 1989. Eight earth dams and a rockfill dam were
reported to have suffered cracks and subsidence in the embankment bodies. These dams
are located within 30km from the epicenter and fairly large accelerations were observed at
the foundation and on the crest of two dams among them. Rockfill dams seem to be
resistant to considerably high acceleration, while earth dams are not always as durable as
rockfill dams.
2.2 SOIL LIQUEFACTION
Soil liquefaction is one of the major items which will cause the serious damage to the
foundation of the dam and the dam body itself. When very loose sandy soil is in a
452
submerged or fully saturated state and strong shaking or a vigorous shock is applied, the
soil will lose shear resistance and the soil mass will behave as a heavy viscous liquid. The
loss of shear resistance is caused by an increase in pore water pressure generated by
repeated loading during an earthquake. The excess pore water pressure reaches to the
overburden pressure when the soil is completely liquefied by the shaking. Liquefaction of
sandy sediments during earthquakes is often recognized by the phenomena of sand blow
or mud blow where small sand volcanoes are observed on the ground surface. Unequal
subsidence and lateral displacement often accompanied by wide cracks or opening in the
ground are seen when the sandy ground is liquefied. Soil structures and slopes subside and
spread laterally by a large amount of displacement which is induced by the increase in pore
water pressure.
The most famous slope failure of a dam due to liquefaction is the case of the Lower San
Fernando Dam during the San Fernando Earthquake of 1976. A major slide occur in the
upstream shell of the dam and only 4 to 5 ft of badly cracked material remained above the
reservoir water level. Eighty thousand people living downstream of the dam were
immediately ordered to evacuate and steps were taken to lower the water level as rapidly as
possible. The factor of safety obtained by the pseudo-static approach was found to be 1.3
using a seismic coefficient of 0.15. A dynamic response analysis was made using a time
history of acceleration which was determined from the seismoscope record recovered from
the slide debris (Seed et aI, 1975). The result of the analysis indicates that a larger part of
the zone of hydraulic fill sand was liquefied during the earthquake and the factor of safety
was reduced to 0.8 a short time after the earthquake. The process of the failure was clearly
described by this marvelous study.
It is necessary to evaluate elastic moduli and damping properties of soils and rocks in order
to analyze the earthquake response of earth and rockfill dams. In the field of geotechnical
earthquake engineering it is already well established that the responses are usually
calculated in the case of shear wave incidence. By introducing the complex shear modulus,
material damping can be automatically taken into account when the equation of motion is
solved either analytically or numerically. In this case damping may be frequency dependent
when viscous damping is considered and it may be frequency independent when usual soil
material is considered. Shear moduli and damping factors are the most important
parameters for the evaluation of dynamic responses of soils. Deformation characteristics of
soils show substantial non linearity in the stress strain relationship. Therefore the secant
modulus of the stress strain curve will gradually decrease as strain increases. Energy
dissipation during one cycle of loading will increase as the strain amplitude increases. Then
the damping factor must be also strain dependent. These dynamic properties of soils can be
determined by in situ tests or by laboratory tests. Through in situ measurement of shear
wave velocity by elastic wave velocity logging or field array observation the shear modulus
of soils can be estimated. In laboratory tests, dynamic triaxial tests, dynamic simple shear
test and resonant column test are used to determine the shear modulus of soils.
The resonant column method was first employed by !ida (1938) to study wave
propagation in vertical columns. Since that time many papers have been published
concerning the laboratory measurement of shear wave velocity. Hardin and Black (1968)
453
have indicated the various quantities which exert an influence on the shear modulus of
soils.
G = f(a o', e, H, S, 'to' C, A, f, t, h, T) (1)
where CJo': effective octahedral normal stress, e: void ratio, H: ambient stress history
S : degree of saturation, 'to: octahedral shear stress, C: grain characteristics, A: amplitude
of strain, f: frequency of vibration, t: time, h: soil structure and T: temperature including
freezing.
In the resonant column test a hollow cylindrical specimen was used to make stress
distribution as uniform as possible. It was found that a solid cylindrical specimen can be
also used since differences of both test results are negligible. Strain amplitude which is
available in the resonant column test ranges from ten to -6 to -3. In cases of strong
earthquakes strains in the ground exceeds this range of strain amplitude. For larger strain
amplitude dynamic triaxial tests shall be applied, in which strain amplitude ranging from
ten to -4 to -1 can be easily attained. The simple shear test is sometimes used to determine
the shear modulus of larger grain sizes. Using these equipments the dynamic shear
modulus and the damping ratio can be determined in terms of shear strain amplitude.
(1963) o 1+ e m
Rockfill Materials
,
Baba (1980 ) G ~ 440 (2.97 - e) a ma "
a 1+ e
(2.17 - e)'
Sasaki (1989 ) G ~ 1100 a m D4
o 1+ e
Core Materials
(2.97 _ e)'
Baba et al (1980 ) 395 a."
G
a
~
I+e
a.
It is obvious that the shear modulus decreases and the damping ratio increases as strain
amplitude increases. This fact is well known as the strain dependency of the material
454
It is said that Collin has first found that shear strength increases when a soil sample is
sheared very rapidly by using double shear apparatus. After some decades A. Casagrande
opened a new horizon in studying the dynamic shear strength of soils. He studied the effect
of loading rate on the shear strength of soils and found that the shear strength of
Cambridge Clay and Manchester Sand exhibit distinct increases when the loading rate is
increased. D.W.Taylor and R.V.Whitman studied simultaneously the effect of the strain
rate. According to the test results of R.V.Whitman shear strength was increased by 1.1 to
1.2 for sand and 1.3 to 2.0 for cohesive soils. B.B.Shimming performed strain controlled
shear tests using a special direct shear apparatus by which a soil specimen can be sheared
in up to 10 to 30 mili seconds. From the test results he concluded that in the case of dry
sand there is no strain effect at all neither in a loose state and a dense state. For cohesive
soils, his experimental results also showed that the strain rate effect depends on normal
stress and the maximum value of strain rate effect will be 2 for clay. These results are listed
in Table 4. It may be concluded from the table that for cohesive soils we can expect strain a
rate effect from 1.2 to 2.0 and for sandy soils 1.0 to 1.2.
The situation is completely different when cyclic loading is applied to saturated soils.
H.B.Seed performed cyclic loading tests on cohesive soils and simulated seismic loading
conditions by adding pulsating load to dead load (Seed et aI, 1966). He drew some lines
of the number of cycles by which the sample fails because of the pulsating load. The
dynamic strength is designated by a ratio of the pulsating load to the static strength, and
therefore the cyclic strength which failed in one cycle is larger than one hundred percent
because of the strain rate effect. It might be easily understood that cyclic strength is usually
larger for clayey soils. However sandy soils fails sometimes under smaller cyclic load than
static. This phenomenon is recognized as liquefaction. The liquefaction strength of sandy
soils can be obtained by cyclic simple shear tests or cyclic triaxial tests. If the stress ratio
between dynamic shear stress and normal stress or the ratio of deviatoric stress and
confining stress are taken as the ordinate and the number of cycles which is needed to
liquefy are taken as the abscissa in a logarithmic scale then the liquefaction strength curve
can be drawn. Cyclic stress, strain and pore pressure are measured during the test to be
able to draw an effective stress path on p-q plane or <J-'t plane. These undrained shear
behaviors must be simulated by constitutive models in numerical analyses.
Liquefaction strength is often referred to as the relative density of sand. For the loose
state of clean sand the linear relation between Dr and 't/<J can be seen. Dense sand has
larger strength compared with loose sand. The pore pressure buildup can be seen also in a
dense sand during small shear strain. However as soon as the shear strain exceeds a certain
value, the soil becomes dilative causing a decrease in the pore water pressure. As a result,
the condition of zero effective stress occurs only momentarily, and the soil retains
considerable shear strength even after the liquefaction. Well compacted rockfill materials
exhibit considerably greater shear resistance than dense sands under cyclic loading
conditions (Matsumoto et aI, 1987). High permeability of the materials will prevent a full
455
development of pore pressure and reduce the duration of fully liquefied condition during
the period of earthquake shaking (Wong et al, 1975). The possibility of liquefaction of
rockfills is likely to be extremely rare even in highly seismic areas.
Triaxial 4 min
1944 Taylor Undrained 1.15
-8 day
Unconfined 0.02 s
A.Casagrande 3-6
1948
& Shannon Undrained
Tr iaxi a 1
kgf Icm 2 -1000 5
1.4-2.6 Prismatic
A.Casagrande 0.01 5
1948 Unconfined -240 s 2.4
& Shannon
Liquefaction of fine containing sand is now the subject of many current studies which
are done for the purpose of analyzing the stability of hydraulic fill or tailing dams. Recent
studies are directed at the effect of fine content, three dimensional effect and the rotation of
the principal stress axis.
456
~i(~)UO
Qj(z) = 21 2 {Djcos(Pt)+ Ejsin(pt)} (5)
D j +Ej
in which Pi=ziV 3/H; Ili=the participation factor of i-th order; Jo = Bessel function of zero
order; zi= the i-th root of Jo; V3 = the shear wave velocity of the embankment material.
Embankment
~-.---- ---I
03 V3 G3
Surface Layer
h
P2 V 2 G2
By equating displacement and shear stress at each boundary of the layers, amplitude and
phase difference at any point of the system can be solved in term of sinusoidal input wave
amplitude AI. The ratio of response amplitude Ac at the crest of the embankment to input
wave amplitude Al gives the magnification factor of the system and the ratio can be written
in the form
Ac 2 j(1+ L,CjD/ + (L,CjE/
(6)
AI ~
where B is a function describing the effect of the foundation vibration on the embankment
vibration and
457
(7)
where K J and K2 are parameters expressing the effect of the embankment on the
vibrational characteristics of the ground. In the Eq.(7),
ri=cos(phiNi), si=sin(phiNi), ~=Pi+JVi+/PiVi lli=2/zjJ 1(zj),
Di=1-(p/Pi)2, Ei=TlP/G, Ci=(P/Pi)2/(Di2 +Ei2),
and Kl=~LqEi(p/Pi)Jl(zi) (8)
K2=u2LCi(Di+Ei2)(p/Pi) J1(zi) (9)
in which r and V represent the density and the shear wave velocity, respectively, and
subscripts 1, 2 and 3 designate the materials of the bedrock, the surface layer and the
embankment, respectively. The response of the embankment can be described by a
function of height, rigidity and viscous damping of the embankment, and thickness and
rigidity of the surface layer.
In order to investigate the effect of ground conditions on the vibrational characteristics
of an embankment, the simple case of a two layered foundation was studied. The response
at the crest of the embankment to incident S-waves was calculated for various constants
and dimension of the foundation layer. In this case viscous damping was considered only
in the embankment to be 5%. Figure 2 indicates response curves of the embankment on
layered foundation. The broken line indicates the response curve of the triangular
embankment body, whose amplification ratio was calculated by dividing the response
amplitude at the crest by the input wave amplitude at the bottom of the embankment. The
dotted line in the figure indicates the response curve of the layered foundation without any
20 -- __ Embankment
........... Ground
I-.
0 - - Embankment Ground
+J
U
ru
~
c
0 10
.,-<
+J
ru
u
.,-<
4-<
.,-<
M
Q,
------- ---,..
E
<l;
0~--------~5~---------1~O~--------~15
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 2. Interaction between embankment and foundation
effect of the embankment. It can be seen from these response curves, that the natural
frequency of the embankment body is calculated to be 8.5Hz and that of the layered
foundation is 7.8Hz. The natural frequency of the whole system designated by the solid
line is 4.8Hz as shown in the same figure. It should be noted from these results that the
resonant frequency of a dam will be affected by foundation condition and eigen values can
not obtained from mere superposition of the individual vibration system.
458
20
c
o
~10
u
~
O~------~5------~10~----~15
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 3. Energy dissipation through the foundation
It is well known in the case of layered foundation that the response of the embankment
is apparently decreased by wave dissipation and we can regard the energy dissipation as
radiation damping in addition to the viscous damping of the system. Figure 3 indicates the
response of the embankment in respect to a different impedance ratio ul, It can be seen in
this figure that the response curves can be regarded as if the damping ratio was increased
when the impedance ratio was increased. This is clear evidence of radiation damping which
can be assumed during two dimensional analyses of fill dam section. For dynamic
nonlinear response analyses, radiation damping can be often taken from 5% to 10%
according to the foundation conditions. It is also pointed out that to simulate the observed
behaviors of actual dams during earthquakes a larger value of damping ratio must be
assumed in addition to the material damping.
The simplest ways of dynamic response analysis might be linear elastic assumption.
Linear elastic finite element analysis can be made by dividing a region of continuous
materials into numbers of triangular or square elements. By defining displacement vectors
{V} on nodal points, the equatiol). of motion can be written as follows.
[M](V} + [C]{V} + [K]{V} = (Pd (10)
The damping of the system can be evaluated by material damping and radiation damping.
Material damping depends on the soil characteristics, stress state and strain state. Material
damping is usually recognized as being frequency dependent and the empirical relations
obtained from experiments are often used to evaluate the values of the damping ratio.
Damping is usually regarded as viscous damping and so called Rayleigh Damping [C) =
arM] + b[K], for example, can be used for the analysis. In this case damping ratio plays a
significant roll in the evaluation of maximum response acceleration. As we have discussed
in the previous section, damping of the system can be evaluated by material damping and
radiation damping. Radiation damping depends on the foundation conditions. The
magnitude of radiation damping sometimes can be decided to be 5 to 10% by engineer's
judgement.
Equivalent linear analysis is a practical calculating technique in which the non-linearity
of materials can be taken into account. The procedure is primarily based on linear elastic
analysis however the elastic modulus of each element is changed in the next calculation in
proportion to the maximum strain which can be given from the time history of the element
in the previous calculation. Then new stiffness matrix is formulated using the new elastic
modulus and the elastic response will be again calculated. For the evaluation of the elastic
modulus, strain dependency of the shear modulus and the damping ratio is taken into
459
~ Elm
70,
i
50'
I
3O! s
10i
~41'
2nd~sec
:\', ~4sec
--~ ""~-' .- -~
Response analyses of rockfill dams are often made by two dimensional finite element
models of the maximum cross section of the dam in plane strain condition. This is valid
only for the long dams in the axial direction. However this assumption can not be applied
to the dams which are constructed on a narrow valley because they will show effects of
constraint by the side abutment. Accordingly for the case of The Tarumizu Rockfill Dam, a
three dimensional finite element model was considered. The model consist of 104 nodal
points, 321 tetrahedral elements and 66 frustum elements. Young's modulus of core
material and rockfill was so decided that the natural frequency of the first order coincide
460
with the observed value of 3.8Hz. Namely Young's modulus of the core material was
assumed as 50,OOOtf/m3 and that of rockfill materials as 90,OOOtf/m3. Figure 6 indicates
some vibrational modes obtained by this analysis. The first mode is a horizontal
symmetrical mode in x-direction (transverse direction) with the natural frequency of 3.8Hz.
The second mode is also a horizontal symmetrical one in y-direction (longitudinal
direction). The third is horizontal anti-symmetrical and the fourth is the vertical vibmtion
mode of the natural frequency of 5.1 Hz. The natural frequencies obtained by the
calculation coincide well with the observed values.
In order to simulate the response of the dam, a preliminary investigation was made, in
which the acceleration records observed at the base of the dam were used as the input
waves to the model. In this case the damping factor was assumed to be 0.15 to get a good
approximation of the response. This value of damping is fairly large in comparison with
the estimated value of damping from the amplification curves. By using these material
constants, nonlinear response analysis was made for the input wave, which was observed
in the gallery of the dam during the Miyagikenoki Earthquake of 1978. The maximum
acceleration of the input wave in the transverse direction was 180.6gal and 234.9 in the
longitudinal direction. Figure 6 indicate the calculation results of linear and nonlinear
analysis. the maximum acceleration of the nonlinear response was 354.0gal and this is
smaller than that of the linear analysis by 7.4%. The magnification factor is 1.96 for the
nonlinear analysis.
400 Linear
Nonlinear
r-< 300
'"
lJ'
200
c
o
:;:1 100
...'"
~ O~~~~~~~~~
QJ
lJ
~-100
-200
-300
In this study, only horizontal movement of the foundation is considered. For three
dimensional analysis, it should be analyzed by three dimensional input waves. The result
will change when the phase difference between left and right abutment is considered. To
simulate the actual behavior of the dam more precise investigation of the seismic response
of the existing dams will be needed.
In the above discussion total stress was considered to describe the stress strain relation of
any soil materials. It is well recognized, however, for the soils submerged by reservoir
water or saturated by seepage flow, pore pressure plays a significant roll in the stress strain
relationship of the material. For example the shear modulus will decrease if pore pressure
is increased by strong shaking. Fortunately we have already enough knowledge to evaluate
the pore pressure generated by dynamic loading, we can easily estimate effective stress in
an element. The way of obtaining the effective stress is related to the theory of plasticity.
Constitutive equations based on plastic potential are often used to obtain plastic shear strain
as well as plastic volumetric strain. Assuming an undrained condition, induced pore
461
pressure can be calculated from the volumetric strain in incremental form, which will take
place when drainage of pore water from the element is allowed.
5. Liquefaction Analysis
5.1 THE CONSTITUTIVE EQUATION FOR UNDRAINED SHEAR BEHAVIOR OF
SANDS
There has been a large number of papers published on the undrained behaviors of sand
under cyclic loading conditions, and great deal of effort has been devoted to constitutive
formulation of the behavior. In these studies constitutive models based on the elasto-plastic
theory are often used to simulate the cyclic undrained behavior of sands. The liquefaction
of sands is a well known behavior resulting from the loss of effective strength of soils due
to generation of pore pressure during cyclic loading. A sudden increase of deformation will
appear when pore pressure reaches confining pressure or overburden pressure. This causes
unequal subsidence, large deformation and loss of bearing capacity, which will result in
damage to structures and foundations. The anisotropic hardening model would be one of
the typical models applicable to evaluate the accumulation of pore pressure under seismic
loading conditioned. Ghaboussi and Momen(l982), Mroz and Norris(1982) and
Poorooshasb and Pietruszczak(l986) would be typical examples of the anisotropic
hardening model. A simple anisotropic hardening model proposed here is based on the two
surface model proposed by Dafalias and Popov (1976). Special attention was paid to
volumetric strain behavior during unloading and reloading.
We define an isotropic hardening surface in stress space;
F(CJij'A,) = 0 (11)
The flow rule for the virgin loading is given by the following equation;
e/= ~(aa:ij)~ and kkP=n(AI)~1 (12)
where eij denotes the strain deviator and 0' denotes the deviatoric part of the enclosed
quantity. neAt) is dilatation factor which defines the relation of the dilatancy rate with
respect to equivalent shear strain rate At. For the isotropic loading surface we use
F = g - R(S)k(A1)p' =0 (3)
where 1'2 denotes the second invariant of the stress deviator; namely 1'2 and Sij ::CJij-
0/3)CJkk<:\j' R(S) denotes the effect of the intermediate principal stress on the shape of
the isotropic loading surface, and p' denotes the effective mean stress. For the function
form of k(At) we employ the following hyperbolic relation:
A
k(~)- (14)
a + bA
1
11.1 -
1
For the cyclic behavior of sands within the isotropic hardening surface, we use the
following loading function
f = j31~ - R(8)k(A )p' = 0
1 (15)
and Qij denotes the back stress tensor indicating the position of the center of the loading
surface and GoO"s) is the isoropic hardening parameter indicating the degree of isotropic
hardening during the cyclic deformation of sands. The schematic representation of the
loading surface in principal stress space is shown in Figure 7. GoO"s) was assumed to have
a functional form
Go(A s)=b(1- exp(aoAs)) (16)
The following flow rule is assumed to derive the plastic strain deviator;
Phase TransformatIon
Bounding
02
ILoading
Events
I Phase Transformation
I
Bounding
"t
I
l
I
Figure 7. Loading surfaces on I
I
I
the deviatoric plane : As ... ~
/ I
I ... '~ ,~1/~' I
It would be necessary to describe the t I" ,,, I I"
Loading Events
difference between the role of the
parameters of At and As. Figure 8 shows Figure 8. Explanation of hardening parameters
the schematic representation of the
parameters At and As under typical loading events. The parameter At is a monotonic
increasing function which operates for virgin loading only. On the other hand As operates
in both virgin loading and cyclic loading within the equivalent plastic modulus surface. As
will be set equal to zero when stress reversal occurs in the stress state beyond the phase
transformation lines, which implies the shrinkage of the loading surface to a point. Thus
the parameter At has the role of memory regarding the previous maximum shear in terms
of the stress ratio, and the parameter A.s plays the role of defining the gradual increase of
shear resistance when sand is subjected to repeated low shear stress and the drastic change
of volumetric deformation behavior during the stress reversal beyond the phase
transformation line.
463
After rewriting the constitutive equations into convenient stress and strain quantities for the
triaxial and plane strain conditions, a computer program was developed in order to simulate
the cyclic undrained behavior of sand. Figure 9 shows an illustrative example of results for
the cyclic triaxial test calculated by the model. The stress ratio in this figure is a quantity
divided by R(S) in Eq.(l5). A gradual increase in pore water pressure can be seen not
only in loading and reloading conditions but also during the unloading process. when the
stress level reaches the phase transformation lines, the effective stress path goes up along
the failure lines, which is one of the typical features of liquefied sands.
0.6~-------------------------,
- U
Q.
~ 0.4
.E:: 0.2
0'
o o.o~--~~~~++H+~~u-----~
....
~ -0.2
0::
Ul -0.4
Ul
(j)
t -0.6 0
100 200 300 400
til
Effective Confining Pressure (kPa)
Figure 9. Effective stress path of an element
The equations governing the interaction of porous solid and liquid were first established
by Biot in 1941 and then the equations were extended to dynamic problems. Zienkiewicz
and Shiomi (1984) applied these equations to nonlinear finite element analyses. The
---
E
U
Hl
>,
+-' 0
-rl
U
a
~ -5 ~, I I
> 0 5 10 15 20
Time (sec)
Figure 10. Velocity response
2
P1 (5. 7m)
~
~
0
-Observed
-1
-Calculated
~ -2
~
2
Q)
P2 (13. 2m)
1
>-0
:l
UJ 0
~
UJ -Observed
~ -1 - Calculated
p.
(lJ
-2
2
"
0
p.
0
-Observed
-1 -Calculated
-2
0 5 10 15 20
Time (sec)
Figure 11. Pore pressure responses
By applying the above equations into a two dimensional FEM model, nonlinear
effective stress response analysis can be made for a cross section of a darn. The two
dimensional analysis was made in the case of a centrifuge shaking test model. Figure 12
465
indicates calculation results of the residual deformation due to plastic deformation after 18
seconds from the initiation of vibration. Figure 13 shows also the calculated pore pressure
response in the embankment model. The residual deformations are crucial to the damage
potential and stability of the dam since it may results in the loss of freeboard. However, the
efficiency and the accuracy of the analysis depend on the ways of modelling and
constitutive relations used in the analysis. Therefore some kinds of calibration will be
needed to evaluate these calculation results by use of field observation results or centrifuge
test data. It is necessary to accumulate the case histories of large permanent deformation in
dams which is caused by actual earthquakes.
~mm)
o 160
~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 . ~5
30
o
cc
~ -30
Elm.45
~=;o IS=:J~
Elm.4S Elm.71
Figure 13. Pore pressure response in a dam model
466
The safety of rockfill dams to seismic forces is usually examined by conventional static
slip circle method. In this method seismic forces are considered as static body forces
which act on the dam body in horizontal and vertical direction respectively. These seismic
body forces are expressed by a ratio the gravity force which defines two seismic
coefficients of the dam, namely the horizontal seismic coefficient kh and the vertical one
kv. Although the seismic coefficient is sometimes related to the maximum acceleration of
the earthquake, there are few well established relations which can explain the destructive
effects of the seismic forces on the structures. In the design criteria established by the
Japanese National Committee on Large Dams, the values are classified by types of dams
and zones in which the dams are to be constructed. The design seismic coefficient
applicable to the dam depends on the dam type as listed in Figure 14.
Stability analysis is made by the pseudo-static method in which the factor of safety is
calculated based on conventional circular slip surface method. The stability of slopes must
be checked for five cases in which reservoir water is; I) at high water level, 2) between
high and low water level, 3) at surcharge level, 4) in rapid draw down and 5) reservoir
empty. One half of seismic coefficient may be taken when the reservoir is empty and then
the water is at surcharge level. The safety factor is calculated from effective stress on the
slip surface, therefore consolidated undrained test results were used for the decision of the
design strength parameters of embankment materials.
fZ:LJ Zone I
o Zone II
CJ Zone III
Zone' Zone" Zone "'
Uniform
Type 0.15 0.15 0.12
Zone
0.15 0.12 0.10
Type
0/
Figure 14. Zonation of seismic coefficient
The safety of a dam shall be confirmed by means of dynamic analyses. For the input waves
used in the response analyses, the strongest earthquake predicted as shaking the dam is
taken. The maximum acceleration and predominant period of the earthquake are estimated
from the magnitudes and epicentral distances of historical earthquakes and foundation
conditions. Empirical equations for the maximum acceleration observed at rock foundation
are often used to evaluate those of input waves. An empirical equation proposed by
Okamoto is frequently used in Japan.
am (.1 + 40) 2
log I a 6 40 = 1 0 0 ( - 7 . 6 0 4 + 1. 7 244M - O. 1 03 6M )
467
where urn is the maximum acceleration, 11 is epicentral distance and M is the magnitude of
the earthquake source. Two or three waves having characteristics similar to the earthquakes
observed at the dam site are chosen and modified to fit the maximum value.
An artificial earthquake wave may also be used for a input wave. Dynamic analysis is
usually made for a two dimensional finite element model of the maximum cross section of
the dam. Non linear analysis or equivalent linear analysis shall be executed to predict stress
state in embankment due to earthquake loading. After adding the dynamic stress to static
one, local safety factor FSL will be calculate for each element. The local safety factor is
defined by the equation
2C cos <)l + (cr , + cr 3 - 2 U) sin <)l
F~ = - - - - -cr,-cr
- - 3- - - - -
o
Figure 15. Definition of local safety factor
which is derived from the stress state shown in Figure 15. If there appears many
elements, whose safety factor is less than unity, as a block distributed in a region, and
continued for a while, slip line going through the mobilized plane of the elements must be
checked. If any continuous potential slip surface might be drawn by connecting the lines of
potential slip lines of mobilized plane of each element, then the factor of safety along this
slip surface will calculated.
7. Conclusions
It could be said from the experience of major earthquakes that well designed rockfill dams
are obviously stable even if they are strongly shaken by earthquakes, and engineers can be
encouraged by the good performance of well constructed rolled fill dams. On the other
hand there are a lot of cases of failures of dams, the causes of which can not be
investigated by any means. In order to ensure the seismic stability of rockfill dams, the
following studies must be executed:
1. To investigate the dynamic behavior of embankment, observation of earthquakes on the
existing dams should be strongly recommended in the seismic regions.
2. Three dimensional response analysis will be necessary to estimate the deformation in the
transverse direction, longitudinal direction and up-down direction as well.
3. For the purpose of 3-dimensional analysis comprehensive constitutive relation should be
used, by which 3-dimensional shear behaviors as well as time dependent behaviors can
be taken into account.
4. Dynamic behaviors as well as static deformation characteristics of fill materials should
be exactly investigated by means of large scale laboratory testing apparatus.
468
Ad;nowledgement
References
Akiba M. and Senba H. (1960) : The earthquake and its influence on reservoirs
in Akita prefecture, J. Agric. Engg. Soc. Japan, Vo1.13 No.3 pp.31-59 (1941)
Ambraseys N.N. (1987) : On the seismic Behavior of Earth Dams, Proc. of 2nd
WCEE,VoLl pp.331-358
Arulanandan K., Yogachandran c., Muraleetharan K.K., Kutter B.L. and Chang
G.S. : Seismic Induced Row Slide on Centrifuge, Proc. ASCE, Vol.114 No.12,
pp.1442-1449
Baba, K. and Watanabe, H. (1979) : On A consideratio for An Earthquake-resistant Design
Method for Rockfill Dams, Proc. of 13th Congo on Large Dams, New Delhi, Q51 R15
pp.l049-1074
Casagrande,A. and Shanon : Strength of soil under Dynamic Loads, PrOC. of
A.S.C.E. Journ. of S.M.F.E., Vol.74 No.4, pp591-609 (1948)
Chopra A.K.(1967) : Earthquake Response of Earth Dams, Proc. of ASCE, Vol.93
No.SM2, pp.65-81
Clough and A.K. Chopra (1963): Earthquake Stress Analysis in Earth Dams,
Proc. of ASCE Vol.2 No.EM2 pp.197-211
Dafalias,Y.F. and Popov, E.P.(1976) : Plastic internal Variables Formalism of Cyclic
Plasticity, J. of Applied Mechanics, pp.645-651
De Alba P.A., Seed H.B., Retamal E. and Seed R.B. (1988) : Analysis of Dam
Failures in 1985 Chilean Earthquake, Proc. ASCE, Vo1.114 No.12, pp.1414-1435
Finn W.D.L. (1989) : Permanent Deformations in Ground and Earth Structures
During Earthquakes, Proc. 9th WCEE, Vol.8 pp.201-212
Finn W.D.L., M. Yogendrakmar, R.C. Lo and N. Yoshida (1989) : Direct
Computation of Permanent Seismic Deformation, Proc. 9th WCEE, Vol.8
pp.219-224
Gazetas G. (1987) 'Seismic response of earth dams: some recent developments',
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.6 No.1, pp. 2-37.
Ghaboussi,J. and Momen H. (1982) : Modelling and Analysis of Cyclic Behavior of
Sands, Soil Mechanics - Transient and Cyclic Loads, pp.313-342
Gillon M.D. and Newton C.J. (1989) : Earthquake Effects at the Matahina Dam,
New Zealand, Proc. of Discussion Session on Influence of Local Soil
Conditions on Seismic Response, 12th ISSMFE, pp.37-46
469
Seed R.B., Dickenson S.E., Riemer M.F., Bray J.D.,Sitar N., Mitchel J. K., Idriss
LM., Kayen R.E., Kropp A., Harder L.F. and Power M.S., (1990) ;'Preliminary
Report on The Principal Geotechnical Aspects of The October 17, 1989 Lorna
Prieta Earthquake', EERC Report No.UCB!/EERC-90!/05
Shibata T.,Kawakami F. ,Yanagisawa E. and Katayama T. (1971) : Damage to Soil
Structures, General Report on the Tokachi-Oki Earthquake of 1968, pp.675-720
Shimming B.B., Heas H.J. and Saxe H.C. (1966) : Study of Dynamic and Static
Failure Envelopes. Proc. of A.S.C.E., Vo1.92 No.SM2, pp.105-123
Tatsuoka, f., Iwasaki, T and Takagi, Y (1978) : Hysteretic Damping of Sands and Its
Relation to Shear Modulus, Soils and Foundations, Vol.95 No.2, pp.25-40
Taylor, D.W. and R.V. Whitman (1947) : The Behavior of Soils under Dynamic
Loading, M.LT. Report to Chief of Engg. U.S. Army
Troncoso J.H. (1989) : The Chilean Earthquake of March 3, 1985: Effect on Soil
Structures, Proc. of Discussion Session on Influence of Local Soil Conditions
on Seismic Response, 12th ISSMFE, pp.l-lO
Wong,R.T., SeedH.B. and Chan C.K. (1975): Cyclic Loading Liquefaction of Gravelly
Soils, Proc. of ASCE.,J. GTD. VoUOI No.GT6,
Whitman R.V. (1966) : The Behavior of Soils under Transient Loading, Proc. of
4th Int. Conf. on S.M.F.E., VoU pp.207-212
Woods R.D. (1963) : Preliminary Dosion of Dynamic Static Shear Apparatus
for Soils, Technical Documentary Report, No.RID IDR 63-305
Yanagisawa E. (1982) : Effect of Ground Condition on Vibrational
Characteristics of Earth Structures, Proc. Of JSCE No.324, pp.101-110 (in
Japanese)
Yanagisawa E. and Fukui T. (1980) : Performance of the Tarumizu Rockfill Dam
during Earthquakes, Proc. of 7th WCEE, VolA pp.133-140
Yanagisawa E., Lee W.S. and Ohmura Y. (1984) : Seismic Stability Analysis of
an Embankment, Proc. of 8th WCEE Vol.3 ppA13-420
Yanagisawa E., Ohmiya H. and Shimizu T. (1987) : Seismic Response of Pore
Water Pressure In surface Sand Layer, Soil Dynamics and Liquefaction,
Elsevier, pp.221-229
Yanagisawa E. and Sugano T. (1989) : Measurement of Seismic Induced Pore
Pressure, Proc. of 12th Int. Conf. on SMFE, Vol.3 pp.2023-2026
Yziquel A., Lino M., Post G. and Tardieu B. (1981) : Seismic Analysis as a Tool in
the Design of Two Earth Dams, Proc. of Int. Conf. on Geotech. Earthquake Engg. and
Soil Dynamics, VoU pp.395-400
Zelikson A., Devaure B. and Badel D. (1981) : Scale Modelling of Soil Structure
Interaction during Earthquakes Using a Programmed Series of Explosions
during Centrifugation, Proc. of Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotech.
Earthquake Engg. and Soil Dynamics, Vol. 1 pp.361-366
CH APTER 16
MONITORING AND SAFETY EVALUATION OF ROCK FILL DAMS
A. VEIGA PINTO
I. Introduction
'"
E.. Mor(m/,o dOl N~\'rl (cd.). AdwlrIcrs ;f! RaclJill Strlfe/II'ts. 471-522.
e 1991 KIIII''f',A cod~mic PllblishuJ.
472
EXPERIENCE
BASED ON SIMILAR
SUCCESSFUL OR
UNSUCCESSFUL
DAMS PERFORMANCE
PLANNING SYSTEMS
THEORETICAL ANALYSIS
(FEM)
2. Type of Measurements
Human/economic potential
External, or environmental Dam condi tionjRel iabi 1 i ty (factor F)
COnd~tiOnS ~=:_ E} _______ _+__ hazard (factor R)
.----
. Danger of Danger of I Reserv. func. I Aggressive I
F d t' I Flood outlet Malntenance Reservoir
t
I Downstream
P~~~~~l Seismici ty b:~~e::~~~:s hf~~~:Sthan (;~~:, O!a~~~~J a~~~!~~n7~~~_1 pr~~~~~1~~~~g oun a lons
I
equipment condi tions vo~u~~af:J) installations
(0:,) design floods ment) : mate, water) I
f------ (1) (2 ) (3 ) (4 )
. 1:;-; ---. -1---i0----t-0;-i7~) 19) (l0)
Low Isolated
< v < 8
ems-') Low . _ _ ___ +~~_~_ - I
Small towns,
Middle Very low I . ' 7 agr ieul ture,
I probability Weekly
r------
Middlefcceptable Acceptable
'"~ :i~W' -:=;::;,.'"
Satlsfac-! 10" - 10
I
I craftsmen's
< v < 16, I, I 1fill damS): storage tory I acthi ties
--- ems
-) I, !--' ~-- I
st I Middle
rong I Daily Strong , 10 7 - 10 9 I sized towns,
< v < 32 . storage I I small
_ ~I I ___ I ~~~~ries
~ms 1) t
f____ ___
Very , , B i g towns,
strong Pumped i Very Poor I > 10 9 industries, I I
Iv > )2 storage 1 strong I I nuclear
ems') _ _ _ + 1____ _________ _ __________ I installations
6
la)
Danger of
blg sl.tdes
High
probability
I Poor or
bad
Insufficient. Unsatisfae-
Not operatio-
nal
tory
t
(a) Abnorma 1 conditions; technically unavoidable intervations
5
E = I
5 i=1
",
",
11
R = L 0-, Global index: o-g - E.F.R
2 i=10
475
t
Displacements Water pressure
Dam height 1----,-------1 Total II Seepage I -____-,--___ ~ Meteorology Seismology
em) I stress d.lscharge I open electric
.
Surface 1 Internal I piezometer piezometer
-- :-- -T---- -- - ---
J
---
1
< 15 if 0: 9 >15 : Tota~ dl.SC~arge if 0: >10 if Cl: g > 9
or R > 3 i ~r ~g?> 3 or R9? 3
t-----+---- -- t-- ------
and~~
15 to ]0 if 0:
:d :
*>10 if; >20 I! Total discharge if (11=-5
(+-I
or 3 9
I
I !
1------- ---
!
> 100
i Partial discharge
. i i
* Installation must be present
(*) Installation is optional
t Inclinometers
o 30m
~I=!;=;;;;;l=~1
598.00
~
585.00
.~
576.00
-~
o 10 m
1====*
~ _Inclinometers
Se.epl!!t.qa
DlsplaeOlPont.. Water preSBu.["e Visual inspections
H'oi.9bt Lite ~-----r----~I Total ~__d_l._e, h_. _r9_'__4-________~______-4______-r______r-______~ Rosorvolr
:$t.aqe stresses level Met e orOl09Y
(.)
Surface I Intern'lll open electriC Noraal I Spoeial ! Xcepcioni!t.l
Tot,a l IPorthll pis:i!oac.tor
IplezollLOter
< IS
< I-- d_ -
.j I-
15 to :10 _~-~ I :-R- ~ 4 I d
u
10 to SO
I I : i=d d
50 to 100
.t --+- f----+-
8 I -W
. I- w --+ ~ ~ --+- j - - -I- ~ --
::> laO Q w w I K d
< 15 5 or Q 5 or Q , or Q
g' ~ d
~ 0
<> A- 6 or 0
--- '- --1
15 to 10 :::: -g or 60r MI60rM 60rH 60rQ 60rM 60r" d
~
I-- . /---II~- ------ I-- ------+-
30 to 50 ~" " 6 or A 6 or K 6 or Q 6 or M ~or A d d
~o: -- -r- --
50 to 100 !: ~ 6 or hllJ. 6 or 1'1 6 or!1IIo 15 or _SA r --+--.__ d
.. ~
0'
:). 100 60rw 60rH 60rw 60r'O
< " B SA SA SA B d d
1l - ---/-- - -- ~-
4. Monitoring Equipment
4.3. INCLINOMETER
Modern inclinometers or slope indicators have been used
4~4
"-Survey station
"-Target
PJ 0 PJE
GRADU_ATED
TOTAL DISPLACEMENT (L L sin oe)
----I
E L EC T R IC A L
CAB LE
ACTUAL ALIGNMENT
OF GUIDE CASING
DISPLACEMENT
ILslnoe
I
1,
1
BOREHOLE
- ~
PROBE: "
CONTAINING i ;-, GUI DE
GRAVITY-
i ',' CASING
-SENSING
:1 ~+-,C___A,,-.SI NG GROVE S
,~
i.[. .,.~"
'I
-'\l ' ~. "'0 .'
'"'1'/
r ",' '.,
0'"
~ RETURN LINE
y 1 1 1 -.r I
OIL/ i I i i I CUSHION
avoid fill arching over the pit which will prevent the true
total pressure to reach the cell. Instead, it is preferable to
install the group of cells in a hollow near the surface of the
fill. The cells should be about two diameters apart and the
surface of the fill smoothed to form flat surfaces for the
cells placed horizontally on planes 45 to the horizontal.
Vertical cells can be placed in shallow slots wide enough to
allow excavation material to be backfilled and compacted by
manual hammers to the density of the adjoining fill. When the
cells have been covered, manual pneumatic hammers may be used
to consolidate the fill, but at least three diameters height
of fill should be put over the cells before normal fill
placing continues above them.
As proposed by Dibiagio et al. (1982) in Norway, remote
reading inclinometers attached to total pressure cells may be
used to ensure that compaction does not move the cells too far
from their intended attitude.
It should also be borne in mind that the presence of a cell
affects the stresses in the ground. Taking into account this
fact attempts have been made at LNEC not only to use hydraulic
calibration but also to discover the response of the cells
buried in soil in test chambers as shown in Fig. 13. It was
found that the influence of the soil on cell measurements may
be very important in some cases.
4.7. PIEZOMETER
Piezometers for embankments are used to measure the static
water pressure or head at various elevations in the foundation
and embankment soils. Four basic types are in cornmon use: open
standpipe, closed hydraulic, pneumatic diaphragm and electri-
cal (vibrating wire) diaphragm.
All piezometers consist of tree parts:
1 t
"0" Ring seal
~-4r-_"--"O_"-"R I n 9 sea I
o
0,
N
_---".j'---'C~o"'a r S e 5 Q nd
__ ~tvonlzed adapter
+-~~~~ ____O.15 m ~_ _ _ -+
" D:".
PERSPEX TUBE
6
, D
~
,," 0
I :1
B_R!<SS PLATE
SCALE
..
11
~: 0 ."
'"
".
.
C>
i!:=====:!J
CHECKING
If---~IMEASUREMENTS If---~I RECORDS 1------,
DATA
PROCESSINGI~--~ITRANSMISSIONI~-~
COMPUTER
SECOND CORRECTION
MEASUREMENT WITHOUT NEW
MEASUREMENT
GRAPHICAL AND
ICURRENT MANAGEMENT 1 NUMERICAL OUTPUTS
IGRAPHICAL ELEMENTS 1
INUMERICAL ELEMENTS I
VISUAL INSPECTION
REPORT
6. Visual Inspection
7.1. INTRODUCTION
The safety of a dam, i.e., the level of risk, is considered as
the probability of occurrence of deterioration and it depends
on care taken and knowledge duly applied in design and cons-
truction. For instance, in the design stage the engineer deli-
neates the concept of the structure. This corresponds to
defining the value of the defect, that is the possibility of
a deterioration with a low probability of occurrence. A
deterioration corresponds to abnormal behaviour of the dam,
the reservoir banks or the downstream zone. Usually, the
engineer prepares the project by using deterministic methods,
i. e., he considers that the probability of failure of the dam
is to be zero since failure of such a structure has results
that are often catastrophic. Nevertheless, numerous failures
have occurred throughout the history of dam construction,
which has prompted a reflection on the mistakes behind them,
and has thus contributed to improving the techniques and
methods of dam design and construction.
The analysis of deterioration resulting from abnormal
behaviour of dams shows that such behaviour is usually
produced by a complex of causes and mechanisms calling for
great care in interpretation. However, it seems that one of
the most realistic ways to learn from our mistakes is to carry
out statistical analyses with structures of this kind that
have suffered deterioration. In this way, it is possible to
get an idea about the mechanisms leading to abnormal
behaviour.
Next sections present an approach to the analysis of the
safety of rockfill dams through a statistical treatment of
cases of deterioration reported in the literature. As will be
proved, the deformations are the most important quantity
related to deterioration in dams. Having this in mind, some
tables and graphs with compilation of measured strains in
rockfill dams will be presented in order to provide an
auxiliary tool for estimating predictable strains in dams and
helping the calibration of values obtained from other means
(models, etc.)_ For the sake of clarity these elements are
presented for the construction phase, the operation period and
an earthquake event.
TABLE 4
TABLE 5
TABLE 6
TABLE 7
TABLE 8
PORTUGAL
S PAl N
..
I nd ia, USA,Mex i co, J a pan, Switzerland, B raz i I,
50
Canada, Italy, France, Yugoslavia,Sweden)
<f) <f)
:l: :l: p
i.0 ..-
0 0
/// I
r .
...J LL.
...J 0
-
/
LL. ...J
os:: /
u f-
0 0 30 /
a: >-
/ /
/ /
20 , /
/
/
j1
.
/
10 /
TABLE 9
ZONE N2 OF CASES
Repair of upstream facing
(joints and slabs) 9
No repair 3
Bank
Reservoir Treatment to ensure watertightness 1
Rockfill placement 1
The first filling is the most critical phase from the point
of view of dam behaviour and the risk involved. Therefore the
Regulations lay down that a plan must be prepared sufficiently
in advance of the beginning of that phase.
For existing dams, adaption to the Regulations must be made
within a period of five years.
9.1. INTRODUCTION
Monitoring of fill dams is mainly concerned with the analysis
of safety and deformation behaviour. This has the underlying
assumption that there may be some mechanisms that may endanger
the operation of the dam and produce deterioration. One of the
most straightforward ways to foresee what mechanisms may lead
to abnormal behaviour in such structures is to carry out
statistical analysis of the cases where deterioration has been
observed either during construction or in the operation
period.
statistical analysis of deterioration in rockfill dams shows
that most of them occurred in dams with upstream facing
(though more in dams built before 1960), mainly as result of
excessive strains in the rockfill beneath the waterproofing
membrane. This proves the importance of the new construction
techniques as well as of the new methodologies for predicting
the behaviour of embankments constructed with those materials.
Likewise, piping in zoned dams is related to the deformability
of the core, since the fissuration of the clayey material and
hydraulic fracturing phenomena are often caused by the
core-shell interaction.
These facts show that in ~his type of fill dam monitoring of
displacements may be of the utmost importance for analysis of
the mechanisms that may endanger the safety of these
structures. It can also be concluded that the ordinary
criteria used in the analysis of fill dams stability (limit
equilibrium methods) are not very meaningful when applied to
the design of rockfill dams, so that mathematical models
should be increasingly used to determine the order of
magnitude of deformations in these structures.
511
H
1m)
280
THERI CHICOASEN
(INDIA)'" -(MEXICO)
IN FERNILLO TALBINGO
160
(MEXICO) LA ANCOSTURA (AUSTRALIA)
(M EXICD)
MAL PA SO .SVARTEVANN
(MEXICO) (NORWAY)
120
LLYN BRIANNE
KEDDARAA
ARGELlA (UNIT~D KINGDOM~ DALECISE (CHECHOSLOVAKIA)
.
MIRA. TERAUCHI
80 SCAMMONDEN (PORTUGAL) (J APAN)
(UNITED KINGDOM)-
.MAUTHAUS KISENYAMA(JAPAN)
LE SU (WEST GERMANY)
(RUMANIA) MON TE DA ROCHA
40 ALVITO BELICHE (PORTUGAL)
(PORTUGAL) (PORTUGAL)
.. CALCULATED VALUES
t (MONTHS)
--
o 2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500
-;.
~~ r-.-- t--....
LB MFD (CR)
........ I"'"
I
\ "\f'-..
LB_SCD
I- ~~ LB_CCD
"
::I: 0.25
l!)
\ UB_MFD (CR)
1\ "'''
UJ
"- ~
"\ ""-
::I:
z-
I-
~
" '\
"
~
0.50
\ "LB_M~D
~
(DR)
a: ~
'" r\
UJ
c..
0.75 \ ~
\
I-
z
UJ
~ ~
\
UJ
...J '\
l\.
l-
I-
1.00
\ \
UJ
III
~
\U~_MFDI(DR) \ UB-lcD I\UB_~CD
1.25
t (MONTHS)
. I\~ T-'
-I-+---\\r+--~~"'---f----+--~"'"""""",,~-~,- - - - + - - - l - - UB_ MFD (C R) -
>--
::r:
1............1 'r-...
-'-'
lJJ
0.25
::r:
>--
Z
1\
::J 0.50
0:
~
:\ , 1"'1
lJJ I
a..
z ~ i
J+.---+----+-----1
0 0.75 ! 1 t----~-+------t-I-~1---1
+-- __
>--
u I \ ' _
lJJ
..J I I !\ I i . U B_S C 0 i
\----+-,---~-- --+-----l---+----i--
1
L
1.00 +---+-+---+---t-
1L
\1
i ---\-
lJJ
0
I I I j __ I
1\
i
1. 25
I
i
I I UB_MFD (DR) i I I
10.0
.....
z
UJ
~
UJ
~ 1.0
.....
UJ
III
..J
u
.....
Q:
UJ
> 0.1
UJ
> Observed average
.....
relationship
..J
UJ
Q:
0.01
O.OO1+------+-------t-------t--
0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0
I>1ALPASSO
PERU 0.5 1938 6 - 0.10 7.6
1936 0.3 - 5.1
78
COGOTI
CHILE 1.6 1943 8 16 0.20 28.1
1939 1.8 0.38 -
84
MIBORO I
JAPAN 2.5 I 1961 7 16 0.20 3.0
1960 1.8 I I ! - I
! 5.0
131
OROVILLE
USA 2.8 1975 6 6.9 0.10 0.9
1968 2.0 0.12
235
EL INFERNILLO
MEXICO 1.8 1979 8 110 0.12 13 .0
1964 1.8 0.35 4.5
148
LA VILLITA
NEXICO 2.5 1979 8 110 4.5
1967 2.5 0.36 3.0
60
LEROY ANDERSON I
USA ! 2.0 1984 6 16 0.41 1.5
1960 ! 2.0 0.63 0.9
72
i
H - Height
H/V - Horizontal/Vertical
M - Magnitude
R - Epicentral distance
PGA - Peak ground acceleration
PCA - Peak crest acceleration
51~
10. Conclusions
This paper was concerned with the issue of monitoring and
safety analysis of rockfill dams. The main conclusions drawn
up are as follows:
VEIGA PINTO, A.; MATIAS RAMOS, C.; MARANHA das NEVFS, E. and
OLIVEIRA LEMOS, F. (1988) "Beliche Dam. structural
behaviour and safety in December 1988" (in Portuguese).
LNEC, Internal Report, 1-42.
1. INTRODUCTION
characterization of rockfill
general principles
analysis of the different rockfill structures that
involve rockfill hydraulics
special matters.
protective filters
protection of the upstream slope of earth dams
hydraulics of natural porous media with high permeabil-
ity, for instance highly fractured rock masses
gabions
hydraulic physical modelling of rockfill.
characterization of rockfill
friction head losses in open channels
stability of rockfill under flow
seepage flow.
2. CHARACTERIZATION OF ROCKFILL
undeformability of blocks
in a given set of blocks the position of each block in
relation to the others is constant
the material that forms the blocks is impervious
the roughness of this material (surface roughness) is
not relevant when compared with shape roughness.
were known.
2.2. Size
2.3. Shape
2.4. Disposition
very compacted), void ratios do not vary very much and are
rather high.In
1.0
.....
>-
cr.>
=
=
=
CL..
OL-------------~----~----------
AVERAGING VOLUME SIZE
1.0
=
=
""" 350 V
I - - - +- \,\\\~~~
./
./
.
~
t\ --
~ \~
~\\\'6\
J.
./
l.oo"
-- --
J..--
~
~
- ...
I"'" \'l.~./
V %\\~;;
~
-
L.,...oo""
~~\
30
0
..... I,..;'"
25"
1 10 100 1000
Stone diameter [mm)
3.1.Preliminary remarks
k' (3)
f=
D
1 d
f (4 )
4 h
I
f
f
I
I
Art88~CC'
U = Ks R2/3 i 1/2 (7 )
1.0
f VI
/
I ~V
V
8
ri.==lIDIi. + II~
~
~" 4,
S
~~
,
*0111 - 0.8, J luoll
""~'~<,#'I!,
I
~
~\\
1 /
~
0.01 9 -----., . i
'--high relatIVe roughness
0.05 0.1 0.1
- comsponGing to vt- = Z log +
O-GOROIIKO, 61
*-Similar In RYABOY, 14 results
I "",dIBD I. lKOMPSOI and CAMPBElli
20
1/6 (8 )
d
3.5. Conclusions
(11)
0.71
0.68 log hid + 0.71 ( 13)
0.056 (15 )
(s - 1) Y d
2.5
~ = 0.16 ( ~ ) (17)
(18 )
tan (
0.01 0.03 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.11 o .l3 0.15
<!>
CS = cos S 1 -
tan
2
e
2
tan <I>
(23)
2
tan
2
(25)
tan
co = cos S (26)
a) Lining thickness
b) Gradation
tan 8
1/4 1/3 1/2 1/1. 5
<I>
400 1. 08 1. 15 1. 3 9 1. 98
Eq.23
75 0 1. 03 1. 06 1.13 1. 22
40 0 1.13 1. 25 1. 73 3.26
Eq. 25
75 0 1. 03 1. 06 1. 14 1. 24
Eq. 26 1.03 1. 05 1. 12 1. 20
d) Specific gravity
4.8. Conclusions
00
04 -
o.
oL--~---"--~-~--~-~-~~
o o. 10 14
1. cKr:=m''--::=____--'U:.c{:cm'c0::'--'- - - - - - - - ,
00
04
01
oL-~~~~L-~~-L~_L_~-L~_~
o 1 a: 3 4 5 eTa 0 10 11 12 13 '"
d(m) U (m/a)
1.0
o.e ---~---
0.2 - - - - -
oL-~~_L~_~~-L~_L_~~~_~
01234581891011121314
ct{rn} U (m/a)
oL-~~-L~_L_~-L~_~~~~_~
012348 o 7 0 "011121314
U (m/a)
cKnII
1.1 =0.05
1.0 -----
0.8 -
0.0
0.4 ----
0.1
oL-~~_L~L-~
o 23-4887891011121314
U {mI.'
-~
K I I
IH-K) I !
~--
~~
-....;;;:
~ f=:::::::: Ilge~:;~u 10
I--
4
r-- lCCeld;n, Ie
OllVIR
I
1 I
o 10 0.10 0.30
5.SEEPAGE FLOW
U 0
Re (27 )
1)
O.071-------t~?t=.........-+_-------------------~O.05
uv = V (31 )
n
4U v m
Re (32)
U
1
i = fs (33)
4m
Uv = ~ 4
f sc 1
Y2 g e di (34)
(35)
U v = C f (C u) Y2 g e di
1
0.26
(36 )
Cu
Vd
Re (37 )
u
556
r Darcy law
5
4
..
'" .. -
c mm
o 2.3
o 6.0 mm
c
3
e
I II
c 011 mm
~
~
2 !\. :
...
COo Cl 00
v ~
o ... 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 l(
ci
Xo
X = e d i 1/3 (39)
5.5. Conclusions
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
George Dykes.
REFERENCES
Jain, S.C., Holly, F.M. and Lee, T.H. Head loss through
porous dikes - University of Iowa - Iowa City, 1988
559
NOTATION
ANNEX I
sample a)
0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
1.10
sample b)
5 blocks:
ANNEX II
HYDRAULIC GRADIENT
energy line
hydraulic orade line and tree surface
Rldraur
Ie grade
line }H
,l L ~
ANNEX III
i K Uv
or i Uv (U v in mm/s)
test output
1 1 1
1.82 2 1.82
ANNEX IV
Uv
measured
[m Is)
1.00
!
0.80
0;,
0
~o
0.60 :"
~
"0
..........
,,:n..
II'
.:t~
0.40 MO~4
_ cl!'ii
angular materials
_,s.""o
.:..~~"
i$f
o rounded materials
f.~;' non-uniform materials
0.10
ANNEX V
Uv = 1.18 Y2 g m i 0.54
Uv 0.56Y2gedi
Uv = 1. 61 h g m i 0.5
Uv = 0.54 Y2 g e d i 0.58
I. I NTRODUCTION
The o ri gin~ of through and overflow rockfill dams can be traced, in Australia at least, 10 the
Cascade Dam (Fig. I). built 10 supply sluicing water to the Bri seis alluvial tin mine at Derby
in north-cast Tasmania (Anon, 1989). It was to enter the annals of history as the only large
dam in Australia to fail causing loss of life. However, despite this disastrous beginning, the
ensuing sixty years have seen the techniques of mesh protection develop 10 the siage where
flood flows can now be passed over rockfil1s with confidence. and where such provision is
almost a normal feature in the construction of rockfill dams. These techniques now permit
substantia! economics \0 be made in the scale of river diversion works, and even the total
elimination of such works in some cases.
Cascade Dam was, in principle, a concrete-faced rockliU (eFR) dam, constructed to
dimensions as in Fig. 2, but with a 70 m central gap in the 0.5 m high parapet wall to serve
as a spillway. This discharged directly onto thc downstream face, with an estimated capacity
of 200 cumecs, 1 generated from a catchment of some 30 km 2 In order to accept these
overflows, the main body of the dam was constructed of granitic rocklill, containing boulders
up to 2 or 3 m1 in sizc, placed to a void ratio of about 0.46. Evidently this was largely hand-
placed in order to achieve the steep side slopes.
On 4th April 1929, the dam was overtopped and failed during an extreme rainfall event,
causing the loss of 14 lives, at which time the spillway flow was estimated to be 6I.X.l eumces l .
Apart from the inadequatel y estimatcd design flood. the steep unprotected downstream slope
ensured that the structure would have a bleak future. Subsequently in 1934 the dam was
reconstructed. with the downstream face flattened to 1.75 : I and additional spillway capacity
(McKeown. 1938). It continues to function, and is again notewonhy in being one of the few
failed dams of such size ever to be rebuilt.
I. At the design flow, il was evidemly imended that the parapet wall would be totally
submerged by 0.5 m or so. The estimated peale flood flow may n01 be reliable, or may
have been a lfaTIsiem surge as discusscd by Bamen (1989).
51'
E. Mur{milu das Ne'es (rd.l. Ad,"UI/(."u ill Rndjill SI""( llIre~. 571-592.
CI 199] K"mer Acadr",j, Publishers.
572
Experiencc gained in the 1930's with wire gabions in river training works inspired the first
reported use of bar-reinforced rockfills during the construction of three embankment dams in
Mexic0 2 , as rcported by Wciss (1951). Of these, San Ildefonso Dam (1939), a CFR dam
protectcd by a rather open grid of 19mm bars, was overtopped at a height of 11 m by a flow
of some 200 cumecs with insignificant effect, but after the bars were recovered for use in the
facing a further flood washed out 7000 m 3 of rock. EI Azucar Dam (1941) was also
overtopped, suffering some damage due to an inadequate height of protection, while Palmi to
Dam (1941) withstood a massive 1400 cumec flood.
A fourth dam (Valsequillo, 1943) falls into a rather different category, being a central core
rockfill in an exceptionally narrow canyon, where a perforated concrete slab was judged to be
the best means of protection against the concentrated flow and flood debris. Of three
overtoppings, the last was the most severe because of the bank then standing at 39m. Internal
pore-pressure lifted and cracked the slab, but caused no failure because of its anchorage into
the canyon walls. This form of protection, however, has not been used again and is unlikely
to be appropriate elsewhere.
Thcse successes in the passage of flood flows over rockfill during construction aroused
immediate interest in the USA where such techniques had been beyond contemplation since
the Johnstown (Pa) disaster of 1889 (Mattes, 1951). However, it would appear that mesh
2. A recent report indicates that the first usc of reinforced rockfill was on two darns in South Africa
incorporating wire gabions (Prins River 1918, and Bellair 1920), both of which were overtopped
several times (ICOLD, 1986).
573
reinforcement still did not find its way into US practice until after the failure of Hell Hole Dam
(California) in 1964, in which overtopping during a 1050 eumee event caused the loss of over
500000 m3 of rockfill (Johnson, 1971; Lcps, 1973)3.
24m
Granite 1: 1
Rockfill
. ().
o o~.o~o
0.' 0 QO
. 0
Granite
From the observation that even unreinforced rockfills4 have a useful, if modest, capacity to
pass water, the concept of a self-spillway dam was developed by Wilkins (1956)
for application to a small (l2m high) structure in central Tasmania, for which the design flood
was around 30 eumecs (Fig. 3). As compared with the unfortunate Cascade Dam, this strueture
had an internal spillway, buried under some 2.5m of rockfill and located so as to ensure that
the phreatic surface would not daylight on the downstream slope. In addition to a flatter slope
at the natural angle of repose, a stabilising berm of large rocks was placed at the point of exit,
and the structure continues to function satisfactorily since completion in 1957.
The main rockfill consists of tipped dolerite, which, although uncompacted, is relatively rigid
(settling - Imm/year after 7 years). This is not unusual for structures of this size (Wilkins,
1989), but the use of an inclined clay core clearly offers advantages over concrete in the event
of deformations occurring. The clay core is capped with a concrete sill to form a spillway over
a central section of some 55m, from which water falls freely into the supporting rockfill (which
it does continuously, as this structure has no outlet works beyond an emergency valve).
3. It would appear that the Pit 7 Afterbay Dam (1965) is still the only recorded use of reinforced
rockfill in USA (I COLD, 1986), together with a similar structure for the Yuba River Project
(Sarkaria and Dworsky, 19(8).
Fig. 3. Laughing Jack Marsh Dam (Hydro-Electric Commission, Tasmania) (Wilkins, 1956)
On the assumption of a mean panicle size - 300mm and a void ratio of 0.85, critical depth
over a buried weir at the design flow was determined to be
wherein q = discharge/unit width and n = porosity), for which the corresponding void velocity
was 2.2 m/sec. A drawdown profile was then calculated, based on a non-linear head-loss
equation from permeameter tests, to reconcile Yc with the assumed reservoir level (F.S.L. +
I.5m) from flood routing studies, with adjustments to geometry and stone size being made as
necessary. However, the applicability of the critical depth criterion in a frictional environment
is open to question, as discussed later.
While the self-spillway concept generally has a restricted application to small flow situations,
it has been incorporated into a proposed tailings dam for the Faro Abandonment Scheme
(Yukon, Canada), which, if built, would be by far the world's largest strueture of this type.
This structure, 50m high, would be required to pass some 530 cumecs over an internal erest
under arctic conditions, where it is required to be maintenance free indefinitely (J.K. Wilkins,
priv. comm.).
4. Laboratory Studies
The functioning of a self-spillway dam has been further examined in a series of model studies,
which served, in the first instance, to define internal regions of flow as in Fig. 4 (Lawson,
Trollope and Parkin, 1962). Energy dissipation occurs through the crest, freefall and
downstream regions, allowing a benign flow to exit from the toe, thus eliminating the need for
energy dissipation works. The design problems include the prediction of water surface profiles
(which determine flood capacity and the distribution ofpore-prcssure and vclocity), the stability
of the downstream toe against erosion, and stability against internal slip failure.
575
Approach
In -built
spillway
Impervious wall
The Darcy Equation of seepage flow ceases to apply for particles larger than a few mm (as
demonstrated in an earl y paper by Bakhmeteff and Feodorov, 1937), so that a turbulent regime
persists from prototype scale right down to model scale, where aggregates of 10 to 20mm have
been used. In a series of permeameter tests on crushed dolerite in the range 19 to 40mm,
Wilkins (1956) established the head loss equation (m. sec units).
where Vv (= v/n) = velocity through voids5, m = hydraulic mean radius (taken to be d/1O in
this case) and i = hydraulic gradient (for which the exponent was constant).
Although there have been suggestions that Reynolds Number scale effects persist through this
size range6 , Henderson (1956) argues that surface drag is insignificant and that, as a
consequence, it is inappropriate to define m in terms of surface area per unit volume
(suggesting it should reflect only void size). It also follows that Equation (2) is unlikely to
vary with temperature. Energy loss has also been expressed in terms of the Missbach Equation
(e.g. Lawson, Trollope and Parkin), which is essentially an inversion of Equation (2)
i - av G (3)
wherein a = 1.85 and the coefficient a is a function of m and the porosity n; and in terms of
the Forchheimer Equation
5. Some (e.g. Bakhmeteff and Feodorov) suggest this factor should be in n2i3 , but despite the
theoretical arguments, Stephenson (1979) claims that vln still gives the most realistic estimate
of void velocity.
6. Sandie (1961) reponed transitional flow in a IOrnm aggregate (as compared with 19mm
aggregate). However. Stephenson (1979) claims that transitional flow persists up to Reynolds
Numbers of around 10". at which point the exponent of i in Eq. (2) becomes 0.5.
576
i - av + bv 2 (4)
Thc latter has attractions in its rational format, wherein the first term can be associated with
viscous losses and the second term with form drag, which becomes dominant in the turbulent
range. However, the simplicity of a onc-term expression can have computational benefits.
The geometry of flow through a self-spillway dam will, in most cases, be fixed by two
independent hydraulic control points, at the crest and at thc downstream exit (Fig. 4).
Separating them is a freefall zone at atmospheric pressure, wherein i = 1 and whercin latcral
dispcrsion and aeration takes place. At high rates of discharge, the frccfall zone may be
eliminated, at which stage the control points are no longer independent. Howevcr, the
structure is thcn likely to bc in a precarious state with rcspcct LO stability, so that this is not
normally a design consideration.
In the crest region, Wilkins (1956) estimated the crest depth he by means of the
critical depth formula, as normally applied to frictionless flow over weirs, modified
only to allow for the volume of stones (Equation 1). However, this approach was
considered to be inappropriate in a frictional environment, such that the computed
crest velocity was likely to be otpimistie (Henderson, 1956).
Subsequent model studies (Sandie, 1961) have indicated that crest flow is
characterised by the attainment of a terminal velocity, associated with a particular
value of hydraulic gradient in the frictional environment. This gradient can be
taken to be 0.8 (rather less than the maximum of 1 in free-surface flow), in which
case the associated value of he (assuming m = d/10) can be compared with Ye from
Equation 1 in an analysis following Lawson, Trollope and Parkin
3 2 (5)
Ye - he . d/6
It follows that thc crest velocity will be less than that from a critical depth analysis for all
depths of flow greater than d/6. It also follows that discharge will vary linearly with head over
the crest, rather than head to the power 1.5, as confirmed experimentally by Sandie. 7
At the point of exit from the downstream LOe, the exit depth he has also been found, from
experiment, to be proponional LO discharge, provided that it exceeds the depth at tailwater. It
not, then tailwater level will provide the downstream control.
In the event that he > htw (tailwater depth), the phreatic line will exit tangentially LO the
downstream ~;!ope (inclination [), whereupon the hydraulic gradient at exit may be taken to be
(6)
7. It was claimed by Henderson (1956), and accepted by Wilkins, that Laughing Jack Dam would
not have the spillway capacity detennined from Eq. 1. However, the critical depth approach is
still pursued by Stephpnson (1979) who considers observed departures to be due to air
entrainment.
577
Assuming that the velocity in the toe region can be taken to be uniform, and introducing a
factor to allow for the deviation from horizontal,
(7)
wherein V. is computed from Equations (2) and (6). This gives predictions in close agreement
with laboratory results by Sandie using modcls of 19mm aggregate and ~ values up to 90.
Elsewhere within the approach and downstream regions, surface profiles may be computed
by applying the equations of channel flow, which for flow through rockfill take the form
(Parkin et aI., 1966).
(8)
where y = fl( .v depth, ib is channel slope and v is the mean velocity. Eq (8) can, if required,
be integrated with appropriaie substitutions.
The analysis of seepage flow is normally directed at the production of a flow net, consisting
of an orthogonal set of stream and equipotential lines. In a turbulent flow situation, these
cannot have the same meaning as in laminar flow, but if a streamline is taken
to be a mean or most probable fluid path then equations such as (3) can be applied to Ule
production of a turbulent flow net.
- - Nonlinear FE solution
- . - - Exper free surface
---- Darcy free surface
Fig. 5. Comparison of flow solutions in rockfill dams, with and williout core
(after Volker, 1969).
578
If a finite difference solution is proposed, equation (3) can be combined with the continuity
equation to form the field equation of Lawson, Trollope and Parkin:
where is a scalar potential function with derivatives <\>, (jl, in the canesian directions and N
<\>
= I/o.. This equation can be solved after the manner of Cunis and Lawson (1967).
In general, however, it will be more convenient to usc finite clement methods which can
more efficiently handle irregular boundaries (such as free surface). In this case field equations
can be developed in a variety of ways from equations (3) and (4) or alternatively solutions can
be derived from the methods of variational calculus, which effectively minimise
energy loss. A series of equations for each of these situations is given by Volker
(1969), together with some comparative results as in Fig. 5.
In their development of the variational principle for application to turbulent flow, it was
shown by Fenton (1968) and Parkin (1971) that the total rate of energy dissipation will be
given by
(10)
(where qj = mean seepage velocity, and dv is an clement of volume), and that the flow field
will be detennined by the condition of E extreme, subject to the energy loss equation being
satisfied everywhere:
(11)
whence by substitution in eq. (10) the flow field can be solved from
(13)
where r = (1 + N)/2. The Euler equation, satisfied at the extremum, is the condition of
continuity.
(14)
In solving Eq. (13) by the finite element method, it was noted by both Volker and Fenton
that a streamline boundary is of "natural" fonn, such that conditions are automatically satisfied
in the variational solution, without requiring specification. Typical solutions from Parkin
(1971) are given in Fig. 6 for flow through a homogeneous bank, from which it may be noted
that the elements of a turbulent flow net change geometry with increasing velocity,8 whilst
8. Wilkins (1963) describes a sketching procedure for flow net construction which incorporates
this change of geometry.
579
otherwise remaining orthogonal. Otherwise, the laminar and turbulent flownets do not differ
greatly, except in that the phreatic surface is somewhat higher in turbulent flow.
4.4 Stability
(15)
where in is the hydraulic gradient normal at exit and ic = i/yw' Equation (16) will
generally predict a factor of safety of around 112 F o ' which means that a stable
slope under exiting seepage will be of the order of half the angle of repose for dry
loose rock.
Self spillway rockfill dams are, however, significantly different from an infinite
slope, and laboratory studies have shown that traditional circular slips do indeed
occur in models constructed of uncompacted screenings. These slips generally
follow closely the concave shape of the phreatic surface, and the application of
stability analysis then predicts two critical failure surfaces (the other being for
shallow surface slides). By plotting experimental slips on a classification diagram,
it would appear that the best defensive procedure is to avoid any operating
condition falling within a critical region so defined (Fig. 7). On this diagram, note
that the seepage line represents daylighting of the phreatic line in the crest region,
and that the barrage region is one where the core cut-off is having a negligible
effect on flow. Superimposed on this diagram is a line derived by Johnson (1971)
9. From stability charts ba5ed on a curved Mohr failure envelope, Charles and Soares (1984) found
that F for a compacted rockftll slope decreases modestly with increasing height, and increases by
some 20% with total submergence.
10. Putting cos [3 (normally - D.8) = I, and assuming i,. < about 0.3.
580
from the progressive overtopping and failure of Hell Hole Dam, California, during
a flood in December 1964. The region above this line could therefore be taken to
give a better bound to the region of danger.
If, in a field situation, a structure is to be formed of compacted quarry-run rock
(as opposed to uncompacted screenings), the relevance Fig. 7 may be doubtful as
there are yet no records of slip failure for such materials in overtopping situations.
However, compacted rock is unlikely to be used in those regions of a self-spillway
dam where good permeability is required.
Slip circle analyses have been performed on overtopped trapezoidal banks of
rockfill, using Bishop's method and incorporating pore-pressures from a turbulent
flow net. These studies by Wilkins (1963) and Fenton (1968), for slopes ranging
from 33 to 45, can be used to define the extent of the zone needing stabilising
reinforcement by drawing an envelope to slip circles having F = 1 (factor of safety).
It has been shown that this envelope can be reasonably drawn as a line parallel
to the downstream slope and in a horizontal distance of 2/3 H (bank height). In
the event that a tail water pond is present, the safety factor on any given circle
increases, but other circles become critical instead, so that there is no net benefit.
However, in the absence ofa stabilising surface mesh, the primary mode offailure
will in all cases be by the erosion of surface stones, in which case slip failures will
not occur.
5. Overflow Rockfills
The design of non-reinforced rockfills for submerged flow conditions can embrace
a range of situations from the construction of cofferdams by dumping rock in
flowing water to rip-rap protection of overflow chutes.
581
i'OO . . . - : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
Over topping, H = he + He
Seepage line
075 he
H/He~1+116-
He
I
"uO'50
I .E I~
1-8
025
LLa;
l:
It
Danger of slip
Stone: 9819 mm
---
Hell Hole Dam failure
o 05 10 15
The former of these was studied initially by Isbash (1936), who identified four
stages in the development of the emerging rockfill bank up to stream closure. This
work was later pursued by Olivier (1967), Stephenson (1979), and others, but will
not be taken up here.
Of more importance is the matter of rip-rap design for application to stream bed
stabilisation and overflow chutes, for which the design curves of Olivier (1967)
have been widely used (Fig. 8). From model studies of shallow layers of aggregates
on an impervious base, Olivier identified threshold flow as the point at which local
movements and realignments of stones occurred, but short of total collapse. This
threshold flow (q,) was shown to be substantially affected by the geometeric
arrangement of the surface stones such that the natural packing factor Pc of
randomly placed stones could be varied:t 33% according to whether the stones
were selectively placed flat (unstable) or on edge (stable).
As there were found to be practical difficulties (e.g. determining whether stones
were at or below the surface) in evaluating the areal packing factor, an alternative
procedure was proposed (without any clear support) whereby it could be derived
as the 2/3 power of the volumetric packing factor, which proves to be (1 + e) for
spherical particles (e = void ratio). Threshold flow is then calculated from the
equation l l
11. Olivier considers this to apply equally to the case of an impervious base and to the loe of a
rockfil1 dam where there is emerging seepage flow.
582
(18 )
Model tests confirmed that ql varies with d/ fl , and equation (18) was then used to prepare
design curves as in Fig. 8 taking Pc = 1.2 (essentially a random tight packing, with no
preferential alignment). Full details of the computation of packing factors are given by Linford
and Saunders (1967).
The application of this procedure to a low rockfill spillway designed to carry some 200
cumecs, on the Broken River, Victoria, is described by Collett (1975). This consists of a 1m
layer of rockfill armouring over a two stage crushed rock filter, and it is of interest to note that
the slope increases from 1: 12 in the upper section to 1:3 at the bottom, where scour is not so
critical because of the build-up of tailwater under high flow conditions.
In designing an armoured rockfill chute, such as the one illustrated in Fig. 9, it is clearly
desirable for the rockfill to be worked over with a backhoe to ensure that the largest stones are
teased up to the surface, and, if possible, also tilted on edge to achieve a low packing factor.
This will normally require some skill.
S 50 OJ
... c:
c:
Cl>
Qj
E
E VI
VI
0
is 20 0
~
OJ
c: OJ
.Q c:
10
I/) E
I/)
C
OJ 05 OJ
"0
>
0
s 0-2 E
0-
a-I x
W 2
0-05 a.
For Pen = 1'2
0{)2 a.
<[
(Packing Factor)
o 10 20
Threshold Flow (eumecs/m)
6. Mesh-Protected Rockfills
The first use of mesh-protected rockfill in Australia (apart from the two structures
described by Ash, 1978) was for the Meadowbank cofferdam, Tasmania (1962)12,
with development thereafter taking the course detailed by ICOLD (1986). In each
case, the elements of the reinforcing system consist of a facing mesh to retain
surface stones, which is in turn tied back into the body of the rockfill by a system
of tension anchors.
It has been most usual for the surface element to consist of weldmesh or a grid
of reinforcing bars, in which case the maximum opening for compacted rock is
considered to be about that of the maximum stone size (Wilkins, 1963). In some
cases, a finer mesh has been used, ranging down to 50mm chain wire, but
experience has shown this to be vulnerable to tumbling rocks and logs, which was
evidently the cause of a partial failure in Cethana Dam (HEC, 1969) during
overtopping (and similarly Paloona cofferdam). For this reason, some later
structures included an overlay of heavy bars to protect the primary mesh (PWD
of WA, 1971; Fitzgerald, 1977).
12. An earlier proposal for the use of mesh protection on Wayatinah B Dam (Wilkins, 1956) did not
proceed in the final construction (ICOLD 1986).
584
Fig. 10. Gabion Reinforcement. as used on H.E.C. Pieman River Dams (Cole. 1983)
(Photos by courtesy of the Hydro-Electric Commission of Tasmania)
(a) Upstream cofferdam. Reece Dam
(b) Main rockfill (with anchors). Mackintosh Dam
.'iX.'i
In recent years, the Hydro-Electric Commission of Tasmania has used almost exclusively
stone-fiIled cylindrical gabions, formed of weld mesh and measuring O.9m diameter by 2.4 m
long. These are considerably less sensitive to surface damage. For cofferdams, where tension
anchors are not normally provided, the gabions are stacked with their axes aligned in the stream
direction, which provides greater stability. However, for main embankments such as Reece (or
Lower Pieman) Dam (Cole, 1983) the gabions are aligned across the face cf the dam, for
economy and better appearance but incorporating, in this case, a system of internal anchors
(Fig. 10).
-~----~
Ww
,
Hw-,J---K1
-l--
~~QQ~~~~~
I __ L
~ u R2
The design of an anchor system is normally based on a sliding wedge stability analysis, such
as that of Wilkins (1963), which assumes the force system shown in Fig. II a. Because <' for
many compacted rockfills is close to 45, the reactions R j and R2 are assumed to be co-linear,
so that
F ~ (W - U) tancl>' (19)
H w -h w
where F is the factor of safety of unreinforced rock fill. It is then nccessary to provide
sufficient steel (reducing the denominator) to bring F to an acceptable value (eg, F= 1 on
normal working stress). The same calculation wiIl also determine the extent of the region
requiring reinforcement, from the analysis of a series of trial wedges.
Minor modifications to this procedure were introduced by Guidici (1967), based on the model
in Fig. 11 b, which provides for di fferent depths of overtopping and different water profiles
down thc slopc. It was found from the model tests of Wilkins that the pore water forces Ul ,
and U2 fitted an equation of the form
u ~ a L" y w (20)
586
with n '" 1.6, and curves were produced for different degrees of overtopping, specified by t =
o and 3m. Active pressure was calculated from Rankine theory, and for the evaluation of F,
pore pressures were factored up by 1.2 and tan $' factored down by 0.9. The volume of
rockfill to be reinforced is then given by the length L to give F > 1, which is generally in the
region of 2/3H in conformity with previous slip circle analysis. Other refinements to this
procedure are possible, such as to determine p. from a Coulomb wedge analysis, as described
by ICOLD (1986).
r
1.3
~1 Surface grid of
20 mm bars
Anchors at 1.2 m hor. SpaCing; 1.2 x 0.3 m
IE
I CJ)
I .
'0
~i_~ _ _ _ ~_
BORUMBA DAM
1.3
ROWALLAN DAM
1.75
~1
TOONUMBAR DAM
I ~~
I
I~I--I----------~~~~:~~~~~~~_~_~~-~~~~_J-r~
1.3
Fig. 12. Tic bar arrangements for reinforced rockfills (As referenced in ICOLD (1986),
except Toonumbar Dam for which see WC & IC of NSW (1970
587
Whilst cofferdams will nonnally be provided with full face reinforcement, on a main
embankment it will be possible for the reinforcement to be tenninated at some appropriate
level. This is known as the mesh protection level, which must be established from hydrological
and constructional considerations to give the desired degree of protection (ICOLD, 1986).
Vertical bar spacing will nonnally be selected so as to ensure that surface bulging of the mesh
is kept to a minimum, but may also be influenced by other factors such as rock size and
construction methods (notably Meadowbank). Wilkins (1963) considers this spacing should
not exceed half the bar length, with a further 1.5m allowance on length (with hook) for bond
development. From the examples reported by Fitzpatrick (1977), it would appear that bar
spacings are generally I to l.5m, and that the only instance of unsatisfactory perfonnance from
a too large bar spacing (4.5m) was thc Meadowbank cofferdam. Bar configuration has also
received some attention, with the objective of ensuring that the uppennost level of crest
reinforcement will be adequately anchored back into rockfill at all times, to guard against
progressive degradation of the crest in a sudden overtopping. This has led to the sequence of
developments detailed in Fig. 12, involving the use of cranked and inclined anchors, and the
use of grouted dowel anchors.
6.2 Perfornlance
The failure of Cethana Dam (referred above) occurred when the main bank had reached a
height of 15 m and was required to pass a flow of 170 cumecs. Because the uppennost layer
of rock could not be protected in advance, (which is one of the advantages of gabions), this
was progressively eroded over some five hours, until a sudden breach opened on the left side,
apparently due to perforation and loss of the surface mesh. The resulting scour was 9m deep,
representing the loss of 15000 m3 of rockfill, but elsewhere the dam showed no evidence of
any distress. In the case of Leichhardt Dam (NW Queensland), overtopping in an 850 curnec
flood caused some failure and loss of rock (Davey, 1960), but elsewhere in Australia
overtopping flows have been carried with complete success (eg. Robson, 1965; Fitzgerald,
1977), as in the illustration of Googong Dam carrying a 2.5m overtopping flow. These include
some quite substantial flows, as at Ord River Dam (northern Western Australia), overtopped
continuously for six months at depths of over 10 m and estimated flows up to 5700 cumecs.
In anticipation of surface velocities up to 8.5 m/sec, the part-built embankment was annoured
over thc top and downstrcam faces with a 1.8 m laycr of 0.9 m rocks, covcred with light mesh
and an overlay of heavy bars (PWD of WA, 1971), but suffered no distress beyond local
settlements of rockfill under the mesh of up to 0.3 m.
threatened (Johnson, 1977). For the purpose of a temporary repair, fill was placed with hand
wackers to re-shape the eroded gully, and covered with filter cloth and a mat of 2 x 1 x 114m
rock-filled gabions. These were wired together and onto 20mm horizontal bars, and 20mm
stakes were driven through the mat into the fill and foundation to provide some measure of tie-
down. The lower end of the mat was left free to deflect in response to erosion downstream.
The arrangement was tested soon after in a 10 year storm, which produced a flow of 125
cumecs (approx. 6 cumecs/m width) and a velocity up to 10 m/sec. Despite appreciable
shifting and compaction of stone in the gabions, exposing the filter cloth, no damage to the
underlying formation occurred.
As all the abovementioned cases required only temporary flood protection, corrosion of the
mild steel armouring was not an issue. In some cases, However, it may be required to function
over a longer term. In the case of Moochalabra Dam, supplying water to the town of
Wyndham, Western Australia, stage construction was proposed, with the stage I structure being
required to pass floods by overtopping (Wark et a!., 1982) (Fig. 14). It was therefore necessary
for the entire mesh and anchor system to be galvanised, in which state it has functioned
satisfactorily since completion in 1972, being overtopped for 3 to 5 months each year by water
depths up to 1.25 m (around 300 cumecs or 2.5 cumecs/m). This structure can thus be
regarded as a development of the original self-spillway dam (Laughing Jack), in which the
flood capacity has been increased around ten-fold. Possible alternatives to galvanising might
inelude a corrosion allowance on mild steel (3 to 6mm) or the use of aluminium, factoring up
the cost by about 2 and 5 respectively (Wilkins, 1963).
589
Horizontal
HEIGHT
15m
12
Steelx 150
~r--:~~~~~~,,-'50 fabric under
x 76mm
9
3A surface bars
IJ
o
! ,
5
!
10
TOE ANCHOR
! !
AT 1-8m ClC
METRES
Apart from Moochalabra, the only use of permanently reinforced rockfill has been on two
estuarine barrages in Northern New South Wales, Australia, in service since 1960 (Ash, 1978),
and on the Pit 7 Afterbay Dam, California, built in 1965 to regulate power station discharges
into the Pit River (Schackleford et al., 1970). The latter is 11 m high, and carries normal flows
up to 180 cumecs and extreme flows up to 2400 cumecs.
7. Conclusion
From unfortunate beginnings, the technology of passing floodwater through and over rockfill
has advanced to the point where such flows can now be accepted confidently on either a
temporary or permanent basis.
The se1f-spilway dam, as conceived by Wilkins and culminating in the construction of
Laughing Jack Dam, was originally based on unrein forced rock fill and restricted to rather low
flows, of the order of 0.5 cumec/m. Subsequent experience on Moochalabra Dam has shown
that such capacity can be substantially increased (to about 5 times) by the use of a reinforcing
mesh, and that this can be made to function reliably over a long term. If the structure is to be
unreinforced, then it must be established that the phreatic surface under the design flow can
be safely accommodated. For this purpose, it has been shown that the head-discharge law is
linear, that the phreatic surface in turbulent flow is higher than for Darcy flow (for similar head
differential) and that the turbulent flow net has clements of varying dimensions (LIB ratios).
The more widespread application is to temporary protection of cofferdams and rockfills
during construction, based on the use of mesh and anchor systems. In present times, this
almost invariably involves compacted rockfills, wherein slip failures are, at this point,
unknown: failure, if it occurs is by unravelling or erosion. Of the various protection systems
reported, the use of anchored chain mesh as at Cethana Dam, could be regarded as not
satisfactory in that it cannot be secured quickly enough in an emergency and is too much at
risk to perforation. In contrast, wire gabions have been shown to produce a very robust
590
structurc, albeit at a price. With appropriate protection, however, it has been shown from many
case histories that rockfills can be rendered stable under even quite massive flows at a cost far
below what would otherwise be required in alternative diversion arrangements.
Acknowledgrrnrnt
Compilation of this report has been much assisted by reference to material assembled by my
colleague, Professor Jack Lawson (Lawson, 1987), and by contacts over many years with Mr.
John Wilkins (formerly H.E.C.). These contributions are gratefully acknowledged.
References
Anon. (1989). The Briseis (Cascade) Dam Failure. Australian Geomechanics No. 17 (June),
p.19.
Ash, R.R. (1978). Discussion on M.D. Fitzpatrick, ANCOLD Bulletin 50 (April) p.23,
(Australian National Committee on Large Dams).
Bakhmeteff, B.A. and Feodorov, N.V. (1937). Flow through granular media. Trans. ASME
(Series E), Journal of Appl. Mechs., V.A. pp. 97-104.
Barnett, R.H.W. (1990). Discussion of Cascade Dam failure. Australian Geomechanics, No.
18 (January), p.ll.
Charles, J.A. and Soares, M.M. (1984). Stability of compacted rockfill slopes. Geotechnique
34:1, pp. 61-70.
Cole, B.A. (1983). Concrete faced rockfill dams in the Pieman River Power Development.
Inst. Engrs. Australia, Civil Engineering Transactions, CE 25:3, pp. 162-169. See also:
Knoop, B.P. and Lack, L.J. (1985). 15th Congr. Int. Comm. on Large Dams, Zurich, 1:1103-
1120.
Collett, K.O. (1975). Unusual surfaces for large spillways. ANCOLD Bulletin 42 (July), pp
3-10.
Curtis, R.P. and Lawson, J.D. (1967). Flow over and through rockfill banks. Proceedings,
ASCE, v. 93 No. HY5, pp. 1-21.
Davey, GJ. (1960). Rock fill dams at Mary Kathleen and Mount Isa. Journal, Inst. Engrs.
Australia 32: 12 (Dec.) pp. 291-300.
Fenton, J.D. (1968). Hydraulic and stability analyses of rockfill dams. Report DR 15, Dept.
of Civil Eng. University of Melbourne, Australia (July).
Fitzgerald, B.J. (1977). Rood forecasting during construction of the Googong Dam.
ANCOLD Bulletin 47 (April), pp. 13-15. See also: ANCOLD Bulletin 49 (October), pp.27-
40.
Fitzpatrick, M.D. (1977). Reinforced rockfilJ in Hydro-Electric Commission dams. ANCOLD
Bulletin 49 (October) pp. 20-26.
Giudici, S. (1967). Discussion of Parkin et al. (1966). Proceedings, ASCE, vol. 93 no. SM5,
pp. 329-336.
Henderson, F.M. (1956). Discussion of Wilkins (1956), Proceedings, 2nd. Australia - New
Zealand Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Canterbury, N.Z., P.
148.
591
Scott, c.R. (1980). An introduction to soil mechanics and foundations (3rd Ed.), Appl. Sc.
Publ. pp. 406.
Shackleford, B.W., Leps, T.M. and Schumann, J.E. (1970). The design, construction and
performance of Pit 7 Afterbay Dam. Transactions, 10th Int. Congress on Large Dams,
Montreal, Vol. 1, pp. 389-404 (see also: Leps, 1973).
Stephenson, D.A. (1979). Roekfill in hydraulic engineering. Developments in Geotechnical
Engineering, No. 27 (Elsevier), 215 pp.
Volker, R.E. (t 969). Nonlinear flow in porous media by finite elements. Proceedings, ASCE,
V. 95 No. HY6 pp. 2093-2113.
Wark, R.J. and Szymakowski, 1. (1982). Moochalabra Dam - 10 years' experience with an
overtopped rockfill. ANCOLD Bulletin 63 December), pp. 40-43.
Water Conservation and Irrigation Commission of NSW (1970). Two dams in northern New
South Wales. ANCOLD Bulletin 30, pp 52-54.
Weiss, A. (1951). Construction technique of passing floods over earth dams. Transactions
ASCE V.116 pp. 1158-1173, Paper No. 2461. See also: Author's closure, pp. 1177-8.
Wilkins, J.K. (1956). Flow of water through rockfill and its application to the design of dams.
Proceedings, 2nd Australia - New Zealand Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation
Engineering, Canterbury, N.Z. pp. 141-149.
Wilkins, 1.K. (1963). The stability of overtopped rockfill dams. Proceedings, 4th Australia -
New Zealand Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Eng., Adelaide, Australia, pp. 1-7.
Wilkins, J.K. (1989). Rockfill - a brief history. Australian Geomechanics No. 17 (June), pp.
7-8.
CH APTER 19
SPECIFICAT IONS AND CONTROL OF NATURAL ROCKFILLS
H. EVRARD
1 - I NTRODUCTION
For both tec hnic al and e conomic reasons. "natural" rockfi ll s obtained
from large r ock quarries have bee n u sed for centuries to fi ght coast-
line erosion , to prote ct river ba nk s and in building earth dams.
Natural rockfills are often supplied from g r avel or dressed stone quar-
ries wher e the rocks conce rned are con sidered unworkable as they cannot
be c ru shed or are too irregular in shape. In these conditions , ex-
quarry prices can be relatively low. The preparation of concre t e blocks
implies sourcing gravel and cement whi ch in some countries are not al-
ways available. The higher density o[ "natural rockfill obta i ned from
heavy rocks vs. con crete a l so means that significantly less tonna ge can
be used to meet no r mal scal ing standards in whi c h hardness is a major
fractor. Economic studies s hould not therefore only consider pr i ces per
ton.
'"
E. Moronho dos N,,u (<,d.J. Adl'tJIIUS III R{)("lifill S'n/("II/r<,s. 593-609.
C 199 1 KJ" ...."r An,demk Publishers.
594
- a shield wall which bears the brunt of the assaults and can be made
up of one or several layers of rockfill.
The scaling of every part of the structure starts with calculating the
mass (or diameter) of the unit blocks of the materials to be used in
the construction. The most commonly used formulae are empirical and ge-
nerally based on experimental studies carried out on small-scale mo-
dels. All formulae include hydraulic requirements.
Figures 2 & 3 below give some of the formulae, in general use for cal-
culating mass
595
Roci<fill o:;~
top soil Rhine rtver embankment
Fabnc filter
TO -soil 020
Random
IDam built In severd. s Ktions I
----~
- -..=.--
596
Fig. 2
Common formulae and notations used by
hydraulic engineers (maritime applications)
w~ 114" It I
II : .vu.~. IU.I
Ie
H I taaku !'It:gl'1t tal
... Hil Buutr up~ 1 :ud.
~r dtpth of the bioCIl HI. tera, of depth of the .... at.r (_I
3 29
3.5 74
4 164
4.5 331
5 625
5.5 1107
6 1870
1J - V6
25
-r
Pa
(~:
where Pa is the true density of the material in t/m~
Pw is the density of the water (1.026 t/m 3 in maritime
environments)
The Table in Figure 4 below shows the fundamental role of the density
when scaling rockfill blocks
Pa Pa
( t/m3)
(~: -1) 3
3 0.42
2.7 0.S2
2.6 0.72
2.5 0.84
598
This quite naturally leads engineers to design projects with the hi-
ghest theoretical Pa possible, almost always above 2.6. This can lead
to absurd situations if local or regional rockfill resources are incom-
patible with this hypothesis. Design offices calculations must inte-
grate the properties of locally available rockfill. Coefficient kd is
also a highly significant factor as it varies, for example from 2.1 for
rounded rocks to 3.5 for pointed rocks and 7.5 for concrete cubes.
1) rockfill is crackfree
3 - 1 - ROCKFILL DENSITY
Metamorph ic
I Schists, micas I Micas quartz + feldspars 1.65 to 2.85
m1caceous rocks Schists, hornfels, gne i ss
-~
Damaged or cracked rocks can have high densities (i.e. over 2.6 t/m 3 )
and thus density is not a sufficient selection criterion for rockfill.
Density does not characterize absolute quality but scaling and Contrac-
tors should modulate density to suit local resources and block position
in the structure. We suggest specifications based on quality proper-
ties.
600
3 - 2 - ROCKFILL PROPERTIES
1m
Porous environmMts
/
environments
20
Porosily
I/) 50
Porosity n ~o
Fro51 cracking flsks
Ai > 80 < 20 ~
- 5 16)
Additional properties
For a facies defined using the approach outlined above, the specifica-
tions are as shown in the table below (Fig. 9).
1 to ~
E 2E
Example : it would be recommended by a rockfill shape
o ;::;GRGA T~S
o
[] i<:OCKf ILL
Fig. 11
Usua 1 b lock shape: cubic r=l
tabu lar c::J
roundee c:::J Quarrying data sheet
L.:....
1E
SUPPl'i CHARACTERISTIC
- vusa 1 appra lsa 1 of loIhO Ie 0
- rockf j 11 stored 1n 10ne d~rMaed 0
nan), ddlMQed 0
yes
crak ina
0 0
- continuity lnde)l On ~hole rockfl11 C*)
- general rodfn1 class
(*) tests attaChed
"0 BfO orO
ROCKFILl ST()(AGE AREA
- Storage area (opacity L.LJ...J arres
- Quant He In stock. on LU 19 LLJ LJ....L..1....l tons
- ~as a pre-sort imple.ented 1 0,,, 0 eo
- Sorting methOd used?
I 1
2) for truO loading 10,'" DO
bucket scoop
1grab DO
scoop
DO
dragl1ne
DO
EQUIPMENT
o o
~EIGHIHG yes '0
- scoop with weigher
o o
'ilr~b
- welghbrldge
I - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA:
QUARRY NAME
ADRESS
OPERATOR NAME
TEl [PHONE/TEL EX
IDENTIFICATION
INTRINSIC CHARACTERISTICS
ADDITIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
PETROGRAPHY
Dens It} ....'ave propagat ion
- Deval
ReSistance to
Speed V 3 axes m/s
Wet poros; ty frost
MINERAL
- t/m3
606
Operator
Type of supply:
1 Intrlns1c characteristics
Vlsua 1 aspect of materia 1 In conformity with spec 1f teat Ions yes no
1f NO, " of material presumed to be wrong:
Charactertstics of these materials : Pe : o o
lew:
Oh :
n% :
frostcraklng :
Cd leu late theoret lca 1 propagat 10n rate :
1 AA'
BB'
(CC' stratl)
Miscellaneous conrnents
ThiS sheet Is completed every day by the site manager responsible for rockfnl reception. If
any delivery is judged not to be in conformity with the speCifications, the geologist an the
approved laboratory are asked to carry out measurements, analyse the causes and advise the
Contractor an the appropriate measures to take.
607
- granularity control
The quarry operator or the transporter are responsible for the supply
and must respect the specifications. To facilitate controls and elimi-
nate errors, "front axis" scales exist which weigh every loaded block.
Material that is not in conformity with specifications must be refused
and withdrawn from stock.
Normally, supplies emanate from approved quarries only and thus should
be problem-free. Lodes do present anomalies, however, and it is sen-
sible to carry out controls when starting a site as well as batch sam-
pling and whenever so requested by the Contractor.
6 - PREPARATION CONTROL
7 - CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Introduction
Asphaltic concrete face rockfill dams are those in which this material is used as the
impervious element.
When asphaltic concrete is applied on the upstream face of an earth dam, it is not
clear if the object is imperviousness. as it might be slope protection.
According to our records, the first dam constructed with an asphaltic concrete
face was Mulungushi Dam (v. table I), made in Zambia in 1923.
The dam, 46 m high, was built with dumped friable micaschist. The attempt was a
failure: the dam settled 1.40 m and, as-a result, the facing broke along a line
parallel to the slope. The leakage was 7.1 m3 /s in 1925, and th e water was
emerging at the downstream face of the rockfill at heights of as much as 18 m. This
shows, also, that the rockfill was not free-draining.
The asphaltic facing was 100 mm thick at the crest, increasing 10 150 mrn below
level 1086 ID. It was formed by a mixture of gravel and a propietary brand of
asphalt. According to Legge (1970), perhaps it became embrittled by the high am-
bient and sun temperatures prevalent in that area before the rairu begin, and was tllttS
not capable of flexing under water load while subject to settlements, and failed.
Remedial measures consisted mainly in dumping impervious material into the
water and over the upstream face (fig. 1). The operation took four years (up to
1929), at the end of which some 115,000 m3 of material had been dumped and the
leaks staunched.
The water level had, by then, dropped sufficie ntly to expose the top of the clay
blanket. A reinforced concrete facing was constructed on it, which extended some
meter below the blanket.
After repair the dam has functioned satisfactorily without any signs of significant
leakage, for at least 40 years.
Table I. Performance of rockfill dams with asphaltic concrete facing (alphabetic order).
I I I I
I Rockfill construction IPostcons-1 I
Name, I Up. I Itructive I I
Country I Islopel I I I I I I cS IRevetment I I
& I I l:H I Rock IPlacement I I n I Eoedlsmaxl maxi structure I I Performance I I
year of I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Icompl et i on I H I type I method I I % I(MPa) (cm)l(cm)1 (em) I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IAlesani 65 I 1.6 I I I I I 0.8 11O(b)+ I 3 INo cracks 110 1
I(France) I I I I I I 12x6( i) I ISome leakage I I
11969 I I I I I I I I lat joint I I
I I I I I I I I I lof gallery I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
IAnchal 25 I 2 I I I I I 110(i) I 1.71 I 81
I(France) I I I I I I I I I I I
11986 I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I
I I I I I I I I I I
IAlmendra 30 I 1.751 gr. IVibrated I 1.71 I I 14( i )+6(d)+ I 0 I I 11
III y III I 29 I I I No I I I I 17( i) I I I I
I(Spain) I I I Isluicing I I I I I I I I I
11968 I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IBigge 56 I 1.6 IShale I c. : I I I 46 I I 14(l)+6(i)+1.005ISome blistersll01
I(Germany) I I and 13Mg platel 0.81 I I 6.3110.3111(d)+ 116 1
11964 I Iclayeyl5Mg vib. I I I I I 12x6(i)+ I I
I I Igray I ra. I 1.21 I I I 10.5(s) I I
I I Iwacke I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I
IBou 55 10.81 ISound I Hand I 126.51 9.5 1>6.31 11220(pc)+13(1)lpr.c. outer ll OI
IHanifia Is. & I & I I I I I 12x6(i)+ I revetment hasl121
I(Algeria) Icongl~1 derrick I I I I I I (p. r.c.) I suffered I I
11937 Imerate I I I I I I I progressive I I
I I I I I I I I I cracking & I I
I I I I I I I I Isl iding froml I
I I I I I 1 I I I 1938 ti II I I
I I I I I I I I 11970 (35 cm I I
I I I I I I I I 1 sl iding) I 1
I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I
Icoo LowerlD30 1 2 IPhyl i-I I I I 11.5(i)+ I 1101
I(Belgium) IU21 1 1 tic 1 I 1 1 16(d)+6(i) I 1 1
11969 I I Ishale I I I I I I I I
I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
IDorlay I 44 I 1.7 I I I 1 I 112(b)+ 15-6 IExcellent 110 1
I(FranCe) I I I 1 1 I I 12x6(i) I I 1 I
11972 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
613
Table I. Performance of rockfill dams with asphaltic concrete facing (alphabetic order)(continued).
, ! I I I
I Rockfill construction IPostcons1 I I
Name, I Up. I Itructive I I I
Country I IslopeI-I-----,-,---r-,-.,.----,-,--+I--r,--IIRevetment I I I
& I I 1:H I Rock IPlacementl n I EOedlsmaxlOmaxlstructure I I Performance I I
yea r of I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Icompletionl I H I type I method I % I(MPa)l(cm)l(cm)1 (em) I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
IOungonnelll 17 I 1,7 I I I I I 17.5( i)+ I o I Some sea l 110 I
I(U.K.) I I I I I I I 112.5(d)+ Icoat ripples I I
11970 I I I I I I I 12x5 ( i ) I 10 11111 deep I I
I I I I I I I I 1 lafter prolan I I
I I I I I I I I I Iged drought I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IEggberg 131.51 1.75lSlightl Rubber I 0.41 75 I 9 I 13(b)+4+ INa damage I 61
I(Germany) I I l l y ce1 tired I I I I 16(i) I 110 I
11964 I I Imented I r. I I I I I I 1121
I I I lsi l i cel I I I I I I I I
I I I lous s1 I I I I I I I
I I I I& whe~1 I I I I I I I
I I I Ithered I I I I I I I I
I I I I gn. I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
IEl Siberia I 82 I 1.6 ISound I Vib. I 2 I I 5.41 15 IPl inth displ'!.l I
I (Spain) I I I trachyl r. I I I I Iced 6cm down. I I
11978 I I Isyeni1 I I I I 1& broken. Twol I
I I I I te I I I I I Icracks conti1 I
I I I I I I I I I Inued 1.8 mini I
I I I I I I I I I lasphalt. I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
IGenkel I 43 I 2.251 Slate I c. : 10.45 1 I 1I 16(l)+ I 0.3lCracks near 1101
I (Germany) I I 1(2.5- 12.5Mg I I I I 12x3(i)+ I berm 1121
11952 I I 138 cm)lvib.ra. &1 I I I 112(d)+2(b)1 1301
I I I I I steel r1 I I I 1+3x3(i) I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IGhrib I 65 0.71 ISound IHand & I 125.51 73 I 35 I 18(pc)+ I 25 I 1953:some r. 1101
I(Algeria) I l. I derrick I I I I 17 I 12x6(i)+ 10.1 Ie. plates I I
11935 I I I I in I 110(prc) I Isl ided down: I I
I I I I Ifou~ I I I( i) in good I I
I I I I Ida-I I I Icondi t i on. I I
I I I I I tionl I I 11963: Separa-I I
I I I I I I I I It i on of a. c. I I
I I I I I I I I Iplates; de I I
I I I I I I I I Isign for reo I I
I I I I I I I I Ibuilding I I
I I I [ I I I 1 I I I
614
Table I. Performance of rockfill dams with asphaltic concrete facing (alphabetic order)(continued).
I I I I I
I I I Rockfill construction Ipostcons-I
Name, I I Up. I Itruct ive I
Country I Islopel I I I I I IRevetment I
& I I l:H I Rock IPlacement I n I Eoedl smax I <5maxi structure I I Performance I
year of I I I I I I I I I I I I
ICDq)letionl I H I type I method I X I (MPa) I(cm) I (em) I (em) I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IGrossee I 57 I 1.5 I gn. I I I I I 18(b)+8( i) I IFailure & de-I
I(Austria) I I I I I I I I I I Ipressions. Del
11980 I I I I I I I I I I Ifects in con=-I
I I I I I I I I I I I Itact wi th cut I
I I I I I I I I I I I-off. C"",,le-I
I I I I I I I I I I Ite repair of I
I I I I I I I I I I I lower portionl
I I I I I I I I I I Inecessa ry 63% I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
IGuajaraz 48 I 1. 75 1 gr. 110Mg vib10.3- Y =1 I I 15(l)+3(b)+1 0.51 Good I
I(Spain) I I r. I 1 19.61 I I IZx6(i) I I I
11972 I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IHenne 58 I 2.251sound Ic.: 10.8 I 180 I 2.41 4.516(1)+ 10- 21 Excellent 110 1
I(Germany) Il. & 13Mg platel I I I 12x3.5(i)+ I Slight pea- 1121
11955 Igray- I & I I I I 11O(d)+ Iling of mas- I I
I I Iwacke 110Mg vi - I I I I 13x3(i)+ I tic I I
I I I I brator I I I I 12xO.5(s) I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
IHochwurtenl 55 I 1.65lGravell I I I I 18(b)+8( i) IContact with 1291
I(Austri a) I I lmorraij I I I I I I cut-off I I
11980 I I lne &-1 I I I I I Itrench dama- I I
I I I I rock I I I I I I Iged, depres- I I
I I I I I I I I I I I sions & I I
I I I I I I I I I I Icracks. New I I
I I I I I I I I I I I impervious f~1 I
I I I I I I I I I I Icing in 75%. I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IHuesna I 71 I 1.6 ISilic~1 Vib. r. I 0.91 Y d=1 35 I 1 I 16(b)+8(i) 0.3lExcellent 1291
I(Spain) I I I ous I 10 Mg I 120 .61 I I I I I I
\1990 I I Islate 18 passes I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
\I rit Emda I 75 I 1.61 l. Ie. with 10 25 1 I 49- I 6.41 1O.8j12(pc)+ 5 ISatisfactory I 81
I(Algeria) I I I Ir. & vibl-l I I 196 I I 12x6(i)+ IProblems 110 1
11954 I I I Isledge 1-1 I I I I le15(rc) Iaccording tol121
I I I I 1-2 passes I I I I I I I (1) 125 1
I I I I I sluiced I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
615
Table I. Performance of rockfill dams with asphaltic concrete facing (alphabetic order)(continued).
I I I I
I Rockf ill construction IPostcons1 I
Name, I Up. I Itructille I I
Country I Islopel I I I I I IRevetment I I
& I I l:H I Rock IPlacementl n I EOedlsmaxlOmaxlstructure I I Performance I I
year of I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Icompletionl I H I type I method I % I(MPa)l(cm)l(cm)1 (cm) I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IKonoyama 33 I 1.8 I I I I I I 18(m)+8(1)+1 o 10penings at 1101
I(Japan) I I I I I I I 15(b)+ I I joints. Good I I
11971 I I I I I I I 11O' 15(i) I Icondition af1 I
I I I I I I I I I I Iter repairingl I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
ILicheyu 57 I 1.75IAnde IOirectio1 36 I I 130.81 lOry mason' I yeslCracks at 1321
I (China) I I site Inal blas1 I I I I Iry 100 I Ijoints with I I
11977 I I I ting I I I I I 12x5(b)+ I Icutoff in I I
I I I I I I I I I 12x5(i) I 136.6 m. Lar' I I
I I I I I I I I I I I Igest relatillel I
I I I I I I I I I I I Ideflect i on I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I 15 cm I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IMartin I 55 I 1.5 ISlate IVib. r. I 0.81 Yd=1 I 8.51 12x6(l)+ I INo damage I I
IGonzalo I I I & 114 Mg I 120.11 I I 16(b)+8( i ) I I I I
I(Spain) I I Igray' I 6 passes I I I I I I I I
11989 I I Iwacke I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IMiyama 175 .5 1 1. 9 IRhyolil I I 10 I 13.5 (1)+ I 3.6l Good 91
I(Japan) I I Ite & I I I I 16(i)+6(d)+1 I I
11973 I I landesj...l I I I 12x6(i) I I I
I I I Itic I I I I I I I I
I I I Ituff I I I I I I I I
I I I Ibrec- I I I I I I I
I I I I cia I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
IMontgomeryl34.51 1.7 ISound d. I 10 I I 9I 12.5- 7.5(1) I o ISome joints 1221
I(USA) I I I gr. slui ced Imax. I I I 1+10+9+ I lopened near I I
11957 I I I I I I I 17.5(i) I Ithe crest I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IMulungush i I 46 2 IFria- d. I I 301 1421 110-15(i) 171001ln 1925 appeal171
I(Zambia) I I ble I I 10 I I I I Ired a crack I I
11923 I Imica- I I I I I I Iparalled to I I
I I Ichist I I I I I I Islope, wider I I
I I I I I I I I I lat crest I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
INegratin I 75 1.6 I IC. by 4 I 0.91 I 32.81 241 15 (l )+6( i )+ I o INo damage I 11
I(Spain) I I Ipasses ofl I I I I 19(d)+ I I I 41
11985 I I Illib. r. I I I I I 12x5(i) I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
616
Table I. Performance of rockfill dams with asphaltic concrete facing (alphabetic order)(continued).
I I I I I
I I Rockfill construction IPostcons'l I
Name, I Up. I Itructive 1 1
Country I Islopel I I I I I IRevetment 1 1
& I I 1:H 1 Rock IPlacement I n I EoedlsmaxlOmaxlstructure 1 I Performance I I
year of 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I
Icoq:>letionl 1 H 1 type 1 method I X I(MPa)l(cm)l(cm)1 (cm) I I I I
I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I
IOgliastro 122.2122.4IRippedl C. 6 1 0.81 Y= 1 1 2I 18(d)+6( i) I 7.31 1121
I(ltaly) I I Iporous 1 passes I 118.61 Ifounl I I 2.51 I I
11970 I I Icalca1 vib.r. I I I Ida, I I I I I
I I I Irenitel I I I Itionl I I I 1 I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1
IOtsumata 1 52 1 1.7 1 1 I I I I I 17(l)+5(i)+1 I Good condi' 1101
1(Japan) 1 I 18(d)+ I I tion
11968
I 1 I I I
I , I
I I
12x5(i) , I I
, I I
I , 1
I
1
1 I I I
I
,I
I I I
I
I
I I
I I
IPerlenbachl 18 I 1.751 gray I I I I I I 16(l)+ I IRenewal of s I I
I(Germany) I I I wacke I I I I I I 12.5(b)+ I land joints inl I
11954 I I I I I I I I I 12x3(i) I I 1985 1 I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IPrims I 62 I 1.75ISlate,1 C. by I I y= I 20 I 50 I I I 10 I No damage 13 11
I(Germany) I I I some I rubber I 121.51 I I I I 0.11 I I
11978 I I Iquart'ltired r1 I I I I I I I I I
, I I I zite I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IRadoina I 42 I 0.8 I I d. well 10'1 11.851 115(pc)+ I 2'31 No damage 110 1
I(Yugosla' I I I I slui ced 15 I I I 12x4.5(i)+ I I 1121
IVia) 1959 I I I I I I I 112(c) I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I
IRiveris I 45 2 I I I I I 16(l)+4(i)+1 I Good concJi 110 I
I (Germany) , , I 18(d)+6(b)+1 I tion
1 1955 , I I I
12x4( i) , 1 I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I 1
1 I
, I I I I
I I I
1 I
ISabigawa 190.5 2.0 ISili- 1 IYd= I 1 1 14(m)+4(l )+1 I 1111
I(Japan) I Iceous I I 19 I I I 16( i )"8(d)" I I I I
I I I tuff I I I I I 13x5( i) I I I
I I porphyl I I 1 I I I I I
I I rite-I I I I I I I I I
I
ISainte
I
42 1.7
I
I
I I
1
I
I 6.3
I I
,10(b)+ , Very good 1I 81I
I
ICeci le , I I 12x6( i) I behaviour 11 01
Id'Andorge I I I I I Saggings in I I
I (France) I I I I I seal coat I I
11967 I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
ISalagou 63 I 1.5 I I 180 I 11 I o I No damage I 81
I(France) I I I I I I I I
11971 I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I
617
Table I. Performance of rockfill dams with asphaltic concrete facing (alphabetic order)(continued).
I I I I
I Rockfill construction IPos tcons-I I
Name, I Up. Itructive I I
Country I Islopel I I I I I IRevetment I I
& I I l:H I Rock IPlacement I n I EOedlsmaxlOmaxlstructure I I Performance I I
year of I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Icomplet i on I I H I type I method I % I(MPa)l(em)l(em)1 (em) I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
ISantillanal 40 I 1.751Sound ISMg vib_ 10 . 5-1 I I I 14.5(m)+ 1<1.91 Elephant's I 11
I II I I I gr_ I r. 4-5 1.3 I I I I 13.5(b)+ I x I skin. Some I I
I(Spain) I I I I passes I I I I 16(i)+9(d)+ll0- 21 flow. Exce- 1 I
11969 I I I I sluiced I I I I 110(i) I Illent result I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IScotts I 46 I 1.7 I Soft I C. 4 0.91 Y= I 34 138.81 I Below a I 125 ISubhorizontalI 71
IPeak I I I argi-I passes 120.61 I I I depth of I (6)lerack at con-I I
I(Austra- I I III ite 110Mg vib. I I I I I 30 m: I Itaet of gra- I I
Ilia) 1972 I I I r. I I I I I 3 layers I Ivel toe and I I
I I I I I I I I I 18.5 cm I Irock fill, and I I
I I I I I I I I I Above: I Ihole 1 mlongl I
I I I I I I I I I 2 layers I 10.5 mwide. I I
I I I I I I I I I 14 cm I IInternal ero-I I
I I I I I I I I I I Ision of gra- I I
I I I I I I I I I I I vel toe. I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IShibianyu I 85 I 1.8 I gn. IOirectio-157.31 I 138.41 lOry mason-I yesl bl i sters, I I
I(China) I I I I nal I I I I I Iry 150-200 1 I caves & I I
11978 I I I Iblasting I I I I I 112(b)+ I I eraks I I
I I I I I I I I 12x5(i) up I I I I
I I I I I I I I 112(b)+ I I I I
I I I I I I I I 13x7( i )down I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
ISteinbach I 40 I 1.75IWeath~1 Rubber- I I 36 I 31 I 15(l)+4(i)+1 I No damage 1121
I(Germany) I I I red I tired I I I I 17(d)+ I I I I
11963 I I Ischistl r. I I I I 12x4(i) I I I I
I I I I with I I I I I I I I I I
I I I IgraveL! I I I I I I I I I
I I I I size I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
ITataragi 164 . 51 1.8 I gr. I IY = I 53.61 9.61 18(l)+5(i)+1 o I Good I 31
I(Italy) I I I I 119 .61 I I 18(d)+ I I I I
11973 I I I I I I I I 12x6(i) I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IVallon Doll 45 I 2 I l_ I I I I I 110(d)+ I 1.5lLocal flow ofl 81
I(France) I I I I I I I I 12x6(i) I (O.2~6 cm downslo-ll01
11973 I I I I I I I I I I lpe of a.c. I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
618
Table I. Performance of rockfill dams with asphaltic concrete facing (alphabetic order)(continued).
I I
I Rockfill construction IPostcons-1 I I
Name, I Up. I Itructive I I I
Country Islopel I I I I I IRevetment I I
& I I:H Rock IPlacement I n I Eoedl smaxlOmaxl structure I P..:rformance I
year of I I I I I I I I
Ic~letionl I type I method I % I(MPa) I(cm) I (em) I (cm) I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
IVenema I 51 I 1.7 gn. IDown. d. I :5201 I 29.4 11.21 12 110( l)+ I 4.51 No damage 11 0 1
I(Norway) I I Up. BMg I 1.51 23-1 I 13x6( i) I I 1121
11963 I I vib. r. I I 35 I I I I I I I
I I I (10-15 I I I I I I I I I
I I I passes) I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
IlIahnbach 145.61 1.6 C. by 1<1. 51 I 1-21 16(l)+4(i)+1 INo repairs orl121
I(Germany) I I rammer & I I I I I l1(d)+9( i) I I maintenance 125 1
11957 I I 10 Mg I I I I I I I I I
I I I vibratorl I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
Illinscar I 53 I 1.7 s. Vib. r. I 1.71 22 I 20 12 119 . 5 1 2 layers I 37 I Cracks at 120 1
I(U.K.) I I 13.5 Mg I I I I I I I union of I I
11974 I I 14 passes I I I I I I I facing with I I
I I I I I I I I I I I culvert I I
a.c. = asphaltic concrete (m) = macadam
(b) = binding layer (p.c.) = porous concrete
c. = compacted (p.r.c.) = porous reinforced concrete
d = dumped r. = roller
(d) = drainage layer ra = ranmer
down. = downstream (r.c.) = reinforced concrete
found. = foundation s. = sandstone
gn_ = gnei ss (s) = sealing coat
gr. = granite smax = maximum crest settlement
(i) = impervious layer up. = upstream
l. = limestone vib. = vibratory
(l) = levelling layer 0max = maximum displacement normal to facing
Y and Yd in KN/m3
619
1108
v
Borehole
The second important attempt is formed by a series of high dams (Ghrib, Bou
Hanifia, Radoina), with rather steep upstream facing (mainly 1:0.7 to 1:0.8). The
first of them, Ghrib dam, 65 m high and constructed in 1935, is a landmark in the
history of dam construction. The impervious facing consisted in a layer of asphaltic
concrete 9 to 12 cm thick, supported by a layer of porous concrete 12 to 20 cm thick
and covered by reinforced porous concrete slabs as a defense against sun rays and
rock fall.
In most of these dams the concrete slabs have progressively slided down and have
finally been taken off.
Ghrib and Bou Hanifia were made with derrick and hand placed rockfill, and
Radoina with well sluiced dumped rock.
Iril Emda, 75 m high, was constructed in 1954 with similar facing, but with
compacted rockfill, a slope less steep (1: 1.6) and non-porous reinforced concrete
protection.
According to our records, the last facing of this type corresponds to an earth dam:
Kruth Wildenstein, 37 m high, constructed in 1964. From the first partial impoun-
ding the facing suffered local ruptures, and the leakage was 65 lis. The reinforced
concrete slabs were substituted in 1974 by two layers of asphaltic concrete.
According to the French Comunittee on Large Dams, it is necessary to forbid the
association asphaltic concrete-reinforced concrete owing to the lack of adherence on
the slope and to the different thermal behaviour of both materials.
620
They add that no example of good behaviour in the long lUn of this association exists
(Ghrib 1936, Bou Hanifia, 1938, lril-Emda, 1954).
Notwithstanding these asserts, which are true as far as the reinforced porous
concrete cover is concerned, the leakage of all these dams has been quite small (v.
table J) and the behaviour of the asphaltic concrete quite good.
The next step is given by the Federal Republic of Germany, which starts, in 1952,
with Genkel rockfill dam, 43 m high, a series of dams of well compacted rockfill
with an asphaltic concrete face (type A) formed by a sandwich stlUcture (fig. 2)
consisting of a bituminous concrete drainage layer included between two dense
bituminous concrete layers (the external one generally placed in at least two
courses), all that placed on a bituminous levelling and binding layer. The reason for
this particular structure is seepage collection and measurement in a toe drainage
gallery (fig. 3).
Drainage gallery
(see detai I)
Rock line ( 0)
Figure 2. Genkel dam. Typical cross-section with details of facing (Sherard et al.,
1963).
The structure of the facing is similar in all of them (fig. 2): tackcoat, 4-7 cm
binding-levelling layer, 4-7 em secondary impervious layer, 6-12 em drainage layer,
0-6 em binder course, 7-12 cm primary impervious layer and seal coat.
,L ,L
1. 50
(b)
Dimensions in meters
Figure 3. Details of drainage gallery at upstream toe of Genkel dam (Sherard et a1.,
1963).
The upstream slopes range from 1:1.75 (Perlenbach, Eggberg, Wehra) to 1:2
(Kessenhamm, and Langenprozelten). The heights range from 18 m (Perlenbach
and Kessenhamm) to 40 m (Wehra).
The structure of the facing is similar in all of them: tackcoat, levelling course 0-6
em, binder course 0-8 em, impervious course 5-10.5 em, and seal coat. There is no
tackcoat in Kessenhamm, Ulmbach, Weilerbad and Langenprozelten.
We only know exactly the behaviour of Eggberg dam, which has suffered no
damage. At Perlenbach renewal of mastic and regeneration of joints was made 31
years after the end of construction (v. Strabag).
The fact is that, after 1967, type B seems to have superseded type A in the Federal
Republic of Germany (v. !Cold, 1982).
Montgomery dam, 34.5 m high, constructed in 1957 in the U.S.A., is the first
successful dam made of dumped rockfill. This dam is, according to our records, the
first dam to incorporate a slab type plinth (fig. 4). In this type of plinth the
displacement gradients of the face are quite small. It has a type B structure, but
with a very thick impervious layer (three courses with a whole thickness of 26.5
em).
ROCK SURFACE
:'-.'-... ~.
J
OF DAM_-+- 0.30 OPEN DRAIN
REINF. ST EEL ARIABLE
L...,lj:::~t--6cm GROUT PIPES EMBEDDED IN CUT-OFF
POUR AGAINST UNDISTURBED :' AT APROX. 20 em
FACE OF EXCAVATION .45
II
O.91IMIN.
GROUT HO L E S -~--~.~ I
-->-L
DIMENSIONS IN METERS
In 1977 and 1978 asphaltic concrete facings are applied on two Chinese rockfill
dams whose lower 65% height is constructed by directional blasting (v. table I).
Shibianyu dam is 85 m high. Post-constructive settlement was important 38.4 cm,
and both dams suffered important damage and leakage that seems to have been
repaired successfully.
The height record for asphaltic concrete face rockfill dams corresponds, according
to our records, to Sabigawa dam, 90. 5 m high, constructed in Japan around 1988.
There is, at present, a trend towards the use of steeper upstream slopes, up to
1:1.5. Examples of that are, in Spain, Martin Gonzalo dam (1990), 55 m high, in
Austria Grossee (1980), 57 m high, and in France Salagou (1971), 63 m high.
Blisters have appeared in many asphaltic facings (v. table I). It seems that they are
produced by drops of water trapped between two impervious courses. In order to
avoid these blisters, construction methods have been developped to place linings
with sufficient thickness (up to 10-12 cm) in only one layer (v. Haas et aI., 1988).
This is the trend in many of the lattest asphaltic concrete facings (v. Icold, 1982). In
the F. R. of Germany, Austria and Switzerland, the dams built after 1971 follow
this trend.
2. Revetment structure
As indicated in the Introduction there are two types of facings used today, that we
have called types A and B. We shall describe them starting from the layer in
contact with the facing: in modern dams stones of small size (transition layer).
The sandwich type structure (type A) has been applied, according to our records,
in at least 23 rockfill dams and reservoirs, and consists, in the most complete case,
of the following layers (fig. 2):
1. A priming treatment with bituminous binder or cement of the subgrade to ensure
adhesion of the facing to the transition layer of the dam, and to provide a working
surface suitable to support the equipment for placing and compacting the next
layer. It is called tackcoat or stabilization.
2. A levelling layer made of coated chippings or bituminous mix, 3 to 8 cm thick. It
has also the function of binding between the subgrade and next layer.
3. A secondary impervious layer of dense asphaltic concrete, 4 to 7 cm thick.
4. A drainage layer, generally of open graded bistuminous mix, 6 to 12 cm thick, or
more if it is non-bituminous (Futaba rockfill dam in Japan, 22 cm).
5. A binding layer of bituminous concrete or coated chippings. When existing it has
from 2 to 6 cm.
6. A primary impervious layer of dense bituminous concrete, 6 to 12 cm thick.
7. A hot-applied mastic seal coat (2 to 4 mm), used for sealing the surface pores.
Such a seal coat prevents changes in the properties of bitumen by air oxidation
624
Sea I coot
------1
Impervious layer
---Bind~
Bituminous emulsion i
I
Dimensions in m
Indications about grading, bitumen properties and content of the different layers
are given by ICOLD (1982).
Bitumen content of the impervious layer usually ranges from 7.5 to 8.5%, and its
density ranges from 2140 to 2550 k~/m3. Maximum k value should be 10-7 cm/s,
the usual range being 10- 8 to 10- cm/s. According to Haas et al. (1988), the
maximum permissible porosity should be 3%. Kjaernsli et aI. (1966) arrive to the
same conclusion, as a means of assuring a k::: 10- 8 cm/ s. Another reason to
maintain porosity below 3% is to avoid oxidation (v. Sch6nian, 1989). Tschernutter
(1988) recommends less than 2%. Permeability usually decreases with time, which
625
3. Construction
Most of the asphaltic concrete facings have been made once the embankment was
ended.
Notwithstanding, in case of long slopes (above 100 m) or when summer construc-
tion periods in cold zones are short, asphalt concrete linnigs can without much
difficulty, be built in stages. The technique of jointing the linings at these stages is
easitly mastered by experienced cons tractors (fig. 6).
Figure 6. Martin Gonzalo rockfill dam repair. Work at contact between 1st and 2nd
phases of face construction (courtesy of Strabag).
626
Facing construction in two phases is also carried out when the capacity of the
bottom outlet is small and safety agains floods is sought, or, when the runoff is
small and it is important to advance impounding.
All this may apply specially to repairs (fig. 6).
The placing system by bands paraUed to the crest is receiving increasing attention,
specially when the length of the crest is greater than the height. In reservoirs this
technique greatly diminishes the time needed to reset the placing and finishing
machine on the completion of each band.
Notwithstanding the common method of placement is by bands along the slope
(figures 7 and 8).
WINCH POR,AL
//~/// TRVC~ I
FO R TK ANSPCRT
VIBRATORY OF ASPHALT MIX
IN INSUlA1EO
ROLLER BUCKErs
2,1 m l
V I BRATQRY ROLLERS
~ J 2 To .
0----- -- ------ ------- -------------
AUXILIARY
WINCH
TRUCK
Figure 8. Binder placement during 1st phase of Martin Gonzalo asphalt face
construction (courtesy of Strabag).
For reference compare with figure 6.
The winches are all mounted on a self-propelled winch portal, moving on tracks at
the crest. When the paver has finished a lane, it moves into a portal-like opening,
and the complete set of machinery moves into position for the next lane.
Two or three vibratory rollers are used for compaction.
On the freshly laid material acts first a light vibratory roller, of 1 to 1.5 Mg, towed
by a winch mounted on the rear end of the paver, or towed by a winch mounted on
the winch portal and operating on the previously laid lane.
A 4 to 5 Mg vibratory roller does the final compaction and smoothening of the
surface. This roller and its auxiliary winch truck operate independently of the main
unit, two or three lanes behind the paver.
The joints between the lanes are in general water-tight if the fresh material is laid
and compacted adjacent to the previous lane, while this one is still hot. However it
is advisable to give a special treatment to all the joints of the top impervious dense
asphaltic concrete. The asphaltic concrete in the joint area is reheated by quite long
joint heaters, which are slowly pulled from toe to top, followed by or combined with
hammering the reheated material with a tampering device, which welds the two
lanes.
Finally, by means of a squeegee on wheels towed by a winch, the hot mastic
629
asphalt surface protection is spread on the slope in lanes from toe to top.
4. The deform ability of asphaltic concrete related to the strains suffered by the
facing
A summary of this subject has been presented by Justo (1968 and 1973).
Asphaltic concrete is a visco-elastic material whose mechanical properties are
largely depended upon strain rate and temperature.
Figure 10 shows the dependence of tensile failure strain upon method of loading
and temperature.
10
8
~
~
c: 7
.....
0
If) 6
0'1
c:
.:>
0
5
0
L
0
L 4
0
...
C1l
::;J 3
0
LL 2
o ~ __ __
~ -L~ _ _ _ _ _ _- L_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
-10 o 5 20 40
Temperature (Oe)
For temperatures larger than 5C the strain at failure is larger than 3%.
We have also indicated in that figure the upper and lower limits for crack
occurrence. Asphaltic concrete even fissured remains impervious up to failure.
Figure 11 shows the dependence of bending tensile strain upon strain rate and
temi,erature. Strain rates in the field are much smaller than 10-5 Is (10- 10 Is to
10- Is) and so tensile strains will be, for temperatures::: 5C, much larger tan 5%.
16 ~-----'----Tr-r------.------.
14
C1) 6
en
c
C1)
r- 4
Figure 11. Relationship between bending yield tensile strain, temperature and
strain rate (Ishii and Kamijo, 1988).
During permeability tests, discs of asphaltic concrete have been subject to bending
tensile strains of 25% at 20C and 22% at 5C without any leakage. These strains
are from two to four times the yield strains of figure 6, which are, so, safe.
Other authors (v. Justo, 1968) quote strains of 1 to 2.1 % before fissuring, and 1.35
to 6.3% for failure, with temperatures from 0 to 30, and strain rates larger than
5xlO- 4 /min. On the other han, for temperatures as low as -79C, the failure strain
might range from 1 to 0.2%.
Up to now, no dam has suffered damage due to excessive compression. The
reason may lie in the high failure strains of asphaltic concrete in compression.
Probably the higher tensile strains in a facing will appear at the junction of this
facing with the abutments.
631
Figure 12 shows the displacements and tensile strains of the asphaltic concrete
facing calculated, at the maximum section of Tataragi Dam, by the FE method. It
may be seen that the maximum tensile strain appears near the junction with the
foot gallery, and is near 1.1 %. Similar maxima tensile strains have been found by
Justo (1968 & 1973). In any case, they might be larger in the upper part of the
abutments or with more compressible rockfills. One proof of that is the cracking of
--I
the concrete membrane at Mulungushi dam (v. table I).
EL.185
180+_ __
E
c
o
i\
~ \
o
> 175
Q.)
170
@
o 1020 em
~
Figure 12. Displacements and strains of asphaltic concrete facing, along the maxi-
mum slope line, and in the vicinity of the inspection gallery of Tataragi Dam (Dai-
cho, 1988).
1. Displacements. a) Scale of displacements.
2. Tensile strain.
3. Tensile + bending strain.
In any case, the actual rate of increase of reservoir water pressure was, in Tataragi
dam, 10xlO- 4 kPa/min., 10-4 times smaller than at the laboratory (v. caption of
figure 5), and so the corresponding failure or cracking strains would be much
larger.
632
Figure 13 shows similar results for Sabigawa dam. We see that, anew, the largest
strains appear near the plinth: 1.1 % tensile strain, 3% compressive strain and 4.1 %
shear strain.
Figure 13. Strain distribution of facing in Sabigawa dam (Ishii and Karnijo, 1988).
1. Tensile strain.
2. Compressive strain.
3. Shear strain.
Shear strain perpendicular to the facing may be important when its support is not
homogeneous.
Thin plates, whatever flexible they are, will fissure if its support gets appreciably
fissured, specially if hoth lips of the crack do not remain in the same plane. On the
633
other hand, in a thick layer, the fissure started with the support may, thanks to the
plasticity of the material, dampen in its thickness without reaching the outer wall.
In this way the membrane will remain impervious.
The contact with the plinth, specially if the abutment is steep, and hydraulic
concrete structures should be specially treated (v. Delgado, 1988; Justo, 1973).
So as to ensure homogeneity, a layer of well compacted, small dimension material
should be placed under the facing.
A very favourable quality of asphaltic concrete is self-heating of initial fissures.
Wide temperature changes, intense frost, light, wind and waves may contribute to
the appearance of hair cracks in asphaltic concrete.
5. Plinths
The plinth is the element that connects the facing with the foundation.
As indicated in figures 8 and 9, the largest strains of the facing appear near the
plinth, due to the difference of rigidity of the foundation and embankment mate-
rial.
It is necessary to provide a connection at which the displacements gradients are
small.
The plinth of Montgomery dam provides quite small displacement gradients (fig.
4).
Notwithstanding, specially with sandwich type revetment, often a drainage gallery
is provided (fig. 3) to collect leakage through the facing and control it. This gallery
allows also regrouting of the cut-off without emptying the reservoir. Usually this
drainage gallery emerges largelly above the foundation to decrease excavation in
rock. The problem is enlarged when the plinth is used as a cofferdam in the river
bed.
If the foundation of the plinth requires deeper excavation than expected in design,
the plinth should be recalculated and, in any case, the excess concrete at the base
should be joined by reinforcement to the body ofthe plinth. Otherwise water
pressure could produce a rupture at the plinth (fig. 14).
The drainage gallery also produces large displacement gradients at the joint. At
least a curvature should be given at the connection with the facing (fig. 3) to
decrease these gradients and, consequently, strains at the facing.
The design of figure 15 provides very small displacement gradients and strains.
634
o 20 40 60 80 100 m
F- - I
@0.30
0.20 ~L 2.50 Ll L 0.70
II 1l'
-t-
1.50
1.00
,I, .... ,
CD\ 2.00
. 'i
. .. 1 3 .00
=-n"""~=rT6.TT!00::P"m="J"'t1 l~o~ f-
Figure 14. Failure of EI Siberio plinth (Alonso Franco and Soriano, 1988).
A. Schematic view of plinth. j) crack construction joint.
B. Failure at area "b". s) = detachment of plinth from
C. Failure at area "c". foundation.
D. Failure at area "d". t) rupture at oblique angle.
Sandwic h tipe
aspha Itic fa cing
\
We II graded crushed
I_~o_ne (1 - 7 c~ __ _
3.001
t--- 6.0_0__________~~~
4 1
I +- 2. 8 6'----~"-i
020/0.25
.. I~-t 90
iO.
-.r--
o .,. 0 "" 0
Connection with,
water-s top 0' o
o. o . : 0' 0" o
0... 0'.' ..
. \l
o,.c o ( ) '
o C u, o 0:
Specia I mastic'
""6 em binder layer (0-16m m)
"'"Scm binder layer(5 -22mm )
"~.~inder layer (IS -32 ~~
" ~ionic eiTlulsion primJ..n~~~_ kg/m2)
Geotex tile HoteJit type 30/13
Copper water - stop 0.2 mm x 2 m
asphal t face
Figure 17. Conne ction of Martin Gonza lo plinth (coffer dam) with
(courtesy of Confederaci6n Hidrografica del Guadalquivir, Spain).
This dam had been previously constructed with a thin plastic membrane.
Chapte r 7,
Owing to the large compressibility of rockfill (9.8 MPa) as indicated in
ons) in the semiper-
to a problem of internal erosion (lack of self-filtering conditi
there was a
vious materi al, and to some in situ permea bility of the membr ane,
rupture in it, and it was decided to replace it by an asphaltic face.
it was four
The membr ane was really a landm ark for a dam of this height, and
before taking the decisio n of
times cheape r than the asphal t face. It was stated,
have produc ed a
employing this membrane, that if it had to be substituted it would
settlem ents.
prestressing effect in the rockfill, and the new facing would suffer less
ent it was decide d to take precau tions in the
Notwithstanding, due to the preced
17. A double line of defenc e against
union with the plinth as indicat ed in figure
imperv ious asphalt ic concrete.
leakage was prepared: a copper water-stop and the
with the plinth. A
The imperv ious layer was strong ly thicke ned in the union
geotextiles was placed inside the binder layer to reinforce it.
637
Figure 18 shows the Hatelit geotextile placed, the paving machine placing the
upper binding layer, and the copper water-stops to the right.
Figure 18. Martin Gonzalo repair. Contact with plinth (courtesy of Strabag).
638
According to our records the first FE calculation of an asphaltic concrete face dam
was performed by Saura (1979).
The three-dimensional FE method is described by the authors and was applied to
Venemo's Dam (v. table I).
The facing was assumed linear elastic.
Several authors attributed to asphaltic concrete moduli of linear deformation
from 10 to 100 MPa (v. Hasegawa and Kikusawa, 1988; Ishii and Kamijo, 1988) and
Poisson's ratio of 0.45.
According to the tests carried out by Kjaernsli et al. (1966), the modulus of linear
639
E = 30MPa
\! = 0.25
This combination gives Eoed = 36 MPa, only slightly larger than the average
value measured during construction (v. table I).
With the parameters indicated, the agreement between measured and calculated
displacements of the facing is excellent:
Maximum calculated displacement normal to the face 11 cm.
Measured displacement: 12 cm.
Three calculations of the facing have been made according to the parameters of it
indicated in table II.
Table II. Asphaltic concrete parameters
I E I
Case I I \!
I(MPa)1
I I
1 175 10.15
I I
2 I 75 I 0.25
I I
3 I 7.5 I 0.25
The results are shown in figures 20 to 22. The following comments can be made.
1. When Poisson's ratio decreases, tensile stresses increase (compare cases 1 and
2).
2. When E decreases from 75 to 7.5 MPa, tensile stresses nearly disappear (compa-
re cases 2 and 3), except at the upper part of facing where they are quite small
640
(2 kPa maximum).
E"75MPa
-;" 0.25
: TENSION
; COMPRESSION
Figure 20. Principal stresses (kPa) in the plane of the facing for full reservoir.
Venema's Dam. Case 1, table II. Justo and Saura (1981).
t
.6
~8 t '7
~3 ~I +-l-!4 .-1!6 .fo
~
4!~ ~~4
....-
,.-7 ... 0
--r-20
'9 , 6 ~7 ~ 7 .7 .. 10 ~ ~ 13
'" 10 3,;:'2
r
~-3
v
~17 ~12. -~r6 -~3 -~2 ... 7 ~3
.. 32.
742. ~ ~ 41 37 --34 -fz9
~
~ 4
.. 2.6
~
--r21
13 ~
-~9
26
-*
, 65
19~
-'f-67 -~ 63
-3
57 46 .'
~6 /' '.,23 53,~6
'66
B~3
r-76 - ~
.. 62 .'4 21 .- 183";..(7
-+67 t 7 r41 - ..\, 22 4 1-
.. 66
-""-"0 --r-79
.56
" 30
~
25
_~21
"4~
_,.54!
1~~37 ~
..
1--.52
33 --1rs86 15 /"'..
"'"32J 3 6
/Y
rnA 47
~'O - ..... 9
E=75 MPa
145%'7i~
-<
.. 24 I: 8 65
.
-"'-,22 MAXIMUM TENSILE i = 0.15
.30 STRAIN 0.39 % t..
113~6'
~
TENSION
~77 ,
tl'7,~ COMPRESSION
----48
*
I
.. ~z
Figure 21. Principal stresses (kPa) in the plane of the facing for full reservoir.
Venema's Dam. Case 2, table II. Justo and Saura (1981),
641
E=15 MPa
y = 0.25
STRAIN 0.41 % t TENSION
~ COMPRESSION
Figure 22. Principal stresses (kPa) in the plane of the facing for full reservoir.
Venemo's Dam. Case 3, tabla II. Justo and Saura (1981).
This reflects the fact that in cases 1 and 2 the facing is more rigid than the rockfill,
and in case 3 it is more flexible.
The distribution of tensile stresses near the abutments and the crest of the dam
correspond to zones at which the joints of concrete faces usually open (Dix,
CogsweeJ, Salt Springs, Lower Bear No.1, Wishon, Paradela, Ishibuchi, Nozori).
The maximum extension strain always occurs at the same place, and has nearly the
same value (around 0.4%), as it is mainly defined by the compressibility of rockfill,
although in the case of figure 22 could not produce a crack because it is associated
with compressive stresses.
In test carried out at the laboratory of duration 3 months (the reservoir was filled
in 4 months) the cracking strain was 1.3%. This explains the good behaviour of the
dam.
The maximum compressive strain was around 0.14%, and was, so, clearly
allowable (v. Kjaernsli et al., 1966).
The following statements can be made:
1. A three-dimensional calculation is necessary to find the stresses and strains in
the plane of the facing.
2. The contac of the facing with the abutment is the most critical zone as far as ten-
sion stresses are concerned. The slope of the abutment will be, so, very important.
3. The relative stiffness facing-rockfill defines the appearance of tensile stresses at
the contact of the facing with the abutment. When the facing becomes more
642
7. Upstream slope
Most of the asphalt face rockfill dams have upstream slopes ranging from 1: 1.6 to
1:2.0 (80% in table I).
Three dams in table I have slopes around 1:2.25 (7.5%)
As indicated already in the Introduction the former asphalt face rockfill dams had
rather steep slopes, from 0.7: 1 to 1: 1. So as to be able to endure the shear stresses
applied by such steep slopes, the bitumen penetration was rather low (20-30 in
Ghrib and Bou Hanifia; 50-75 in Radoina).
For slopes from 1:1.3 to 1:1.5 penetrations 60-70 have been used in Taum-Sank
and Salagou, and 40-50 in Legadadi.
Most of the penetrations range from 40-60 to 80-100 (v. Icold, 1982).
Icold (1982) indicates the following:
It could be said that the maximum slope limit compatible with the construction of
this type of facing is 1:1.5, which is the limit for the stability of the hot mix on the
inclined plane, before and after compaction, and for a safe foothold for workers
without provision of special devices.
Figures 6, 8, 9, 18 and 19 show the work on a 1:1.5 slope.
Table I collects many outstanding asphaltic face rockfill dams, on most of which its
performance is known.
There are only two failures.
The first is Mulungushi Dam, in which probably the main cause is the large
compressibility of the dumped rockfill, and the resulting large post-constructive
settlement (1.40 m). The extremely high leakage (7.1 m3 /s), rupture of the facing
and important repair (v. fig. 1) deserve the denomination of failure.
The second failure is Scotts Peak Dam (fig. 23). A crack, more than 50 mm wide
at some places, appeared mainly at the contact between the rather stiff gravel toe
and the more compressible argillite rockfill.
Cracks were filled with gravel and sand, and butyl rubber patches applied on
them. Finally a gravel blanket with 15% below No. 200 sieve was placed on the
643
H ~
I 1-7
zonel3A
117
Zone 3A
Cracks have also appeared at the union of facing with culverts (Wins car dam) or
galleries (Alesani).
We have also described in the Introduction the sliding of the porous reinforced
concrete slabs and the problem of blisters (Bigge, Shibianyu).
Some problems have arised at the contact with the plinth (Grosse, Licheyu,
Hochwurten).
Notwithstanding that, the general performance is excellent. With the exception of
644
the two indicated failures, and the problem of Winscar, in no case has leakage due
to the facing exceeded 7 lis.
The leakage of EI Siberia (15 I/s) was due to a rupture of the plinth (fig. 9) with
no relationship at all with the facing.
At Ghrib Dam self-healing reduced leakage from 25 to 0.1 1/ s.
Long term behaviour of asphaltic concrete is good (v. Weinhold and Haugh,
1988).
Some dams included in table I have suffered important post-constructive
deformations (Ghrib, Prims, Steinbach), and notwithstanding that the performance
was excellent.
Figures 25, 26 and 27 show the aspect of two asphalt face dams, whose performan-
ce is, up to now, excellent.
Figure 25. Martfn Gonzalo asphalt face dam during impounding (courtesy of
Strabag).
Figure 26. Huesna Dam at the end of construction. Designer: Engineer B. Bayan.
'J>
'"+-
646
Figure 27. Huesna Dam. Aspect of facing after first drawdown (courtesy of Stra-
bag).
Asphaltic concrete facing is an excellent impervious element for dams, due to its
flexibility, speed of construction, self-healing properties and easiness of repair (v.
Ditter and Haug, 1989).
Notwithstanding its future is much related to the price of oil.
In the 1950's an asphaltic concrete facing was much cheaper than a reinforced
concrete one (v. Scheidenhelm and Snethlage, 1960). In the 1980's the cost of an
asphaltic concrete facing in Spain was double the price of a reinforced concrete
deck.
In 1988, in Italy bituminous materials were in the first position among the various
types of upstream impervious elements.
At the moment of writing this Chapter (September 1990) the Gulf crisis throws a
shade of incertitude about the price of asphaltic concrete.
Asphaltic concrete linings are fully compatible with drinking water (v. SchOnian,
1989).
647
The election between asphaltic concrete and reinforced concrete will depend
mainly upon the importance of losses of water and deform ability of rockfill. When
water losses are important and only low grade rockfill is at hand, asphaltic concrete
will probably be a better election owing to its water-tightness and flexibility.
648
References
15. Kjaernsli, B., Mourn, J. and Torblaa, I., 1966. "Laboratory tests on as-
phaltic concrete for an impervious membrane on the Venemo rock-fill
dam". N.G.I:, 69:17-26.
16. Koenig, H.W. and Idel, 1967. "Deformation and loading of a rockfill dam
with bituminous surface membrane". 9th Congo Large Dams, 3:701-712.
17. Legge, G.H.H., 1970. "Mulungushi and Mila Hills dams operation and
maintenance". 16th Congo Large Dams, Montreal, 3:71-90.
18. Matsumoto, N., Yasuda, N., Ogawa, M. and Iwata, M., 1985. "Investiga-
tions of cracks in an asphalt concrete facing and comparison between
observed cracking and predicted behaviour by earthquake analysis". 15th
Congo Large Dams, Lausanne, Vol. 1:559-578.
19. Penman, AD.M. and Charles, J.A, 1985. "Behaviour of rockfill dam with
asphaltic membrane". 11th Congo ICSMFE, San Francisco, 4:2011-2014.
20. Routh, C.D., 1988. "The investigation, identification and repair of the
asphaltic concrete facing of Winscar dam". 16th Congo Large Dams, 2:
655-677.
21. Saura, J., 1979. "Estudio tridimensional de tensiones y deformaciones en
pres as de materiales sueltos". Ph. D. Thesis. Poly technical University of
Madrid.
22. Scheidenhelm, F.W., Snethlage, J.B. and Vanderlip, AN., 1960. "Mont-
gomery dam with asphaltic concrete deck". Trans. ASCE, 125:2B:431-464.
23. Schewe, L. and Geiseler, D., 1985. "Application of asphalt concrete in
sealing of embankment dams". Geotechnik, Special Issue 1985,68-72.
24. SchOnian, E., 1989. "Waterproofing of dams and reservoirs by asphaltic
concrete, its practical performance and compatibility with drinking
water". Asphalt-Wasserbau 11/1. Teil A Strabag, p. 25-36.
25. Sherard, J.L., Woodward, R.J., Gizienski, S.F. and Clevenger, W.A,
1963. "Earth and Earth-Rock Dams". Wiley, N.Y.
26. Smith, L.D., Macpherson, H.H. and Oechsel, R.G., 1988. "Long term
performance. Asphalt lineal upper reservoir Seneca pumped storage
station". 16th Congo Large Dams, San Francisco, 2:501-523.
27. Steffen, H., 1976. "The experience with impervious asphaltic elements
and the conclusions for their design". 12th Congo Large Dams, Mexico,
1:395-405.
28. Strabag. "Asphaltic concrete sealings of hydraulic structures".
29. Tschernutter, P., 1988. "Experience gained with asphaltic concrete fa-
cings on high-level emb ankment dams of the Fragant group of power
schemes". 16th Congo Large Dams, San Francisco, 2: 1105-113l.
30. Van Asbeck, W.F., 1964. "Bitumen in Hydraulic Engineering". Vol. 2
Elsevier, Amsterdam.
650
31. Weinhold, R. and Haug, W., 1988. "The influence of large deformations
on asphaltic cores and membranes -examples of the rockfill dams of
Breitenbach and Prims-reservoir, FRG". 16th Congo Large Dams, 2:399-
414.
32. Yang, Q, Sun, Z. and Ding, P., 1988. "Asphalt concrete facing for rockfill
dams built by directional blasting". 16th Congo Large Dams, San Francis-
co, Vol. 2,1091-1103.
CLOSING SESSION
F. FREDERICO
be easily recalled.
The first one regards the concept of limit state design and
the use of partial safety factors. In his lecture, Prof.
Maranha das Neves pointed out, among many different arguments,
such as the different phases of dam life, the role of filters,
the importance of parametric study of the dam behaviour, that
analytical procedures for practical and current applications
to limit state of rockfill structures are lacking.
The second example concerns the phenomenon of collapse of
rockfill, which was analyzed from different points of view by
Professors Justo, Charles, Parkin, Veiga Pinto.
For both examples the speakers recalled that further
research efforts are still needed. To this purpose, it is
worth mentioning, as Prof. Veiga Pinto and Prof. Maranha das
Neves did in their panel discussion on "Rockfill Future", that
the mechanical behaviour of rockf i 11 may also be analyzed
taking into account the peculiarity of this material: i.e. its
granular nature. According to this line of thought, the
analysis should be carried out based on the principles of the
Mechanics of Particulate Materials, taking in due account the
main geometrical (average diameter, shape) and mechanical
(modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio) properties of the
single grains as well as the fabric of the medium.
At the end of this very important and interesting course we
are convinced that the existing knowledge is more firmly
founded on Soil Mechanics principles and new paths have been
discovered; as a consequence, new lines of researchs can
positively be followed.
Many thanks again.
J. ANDREW CHARLES
I will not bore you with a long speech but it is with great
pleasure and gratification that I am addressing some words to
you.
Concerning the Course itself I think that the summing-up
was so well done by Dr. Andrew Charles and Dr. Francesco
Federico that the only thing to be said is to thank their
kind and generous appreciations.
Nevertheless I must also thank to all those who assisted us
in organizing this Course:
Lecturers
Student Participants
4000 PORTO
PORTUGAL
663