Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 February 2013
Miriams Journey
Miriams Kitchen serves as a narrative that traces the authors journey through
spiritual development, as well as the authors involvement in her familys religious and
behind the authors movement towards keeping a kosher kitchen, her decisions in the
process, and finally the meaning behind it all as according to her. The first question can
be answered through the concepts of tradition, history, culture, religion, and more
and separation come to mind. Finally, what does keeping a kosher kitchen even mean to
Elizabeth Ehrlich (the author)? To her, there existed a fine line between religion and
As soon as she gets old enough to understand the value and importance that
tradition holds, she begins to look back and trace her family roots (by now, she is a
mother raising her own children). She traces her roots back in time to the peak of the
Jewish diaspora (the dispersion of Jews beyond their homeland), a time when many of
her grandparents and great grandparents had immigrated to America in hardship. She
begins to think of their ways, and if she shall let these ways be passed down to her
own present lifestyle. So should she connect her ancestors traditional values among the
family, values that had been the product of difficult assimilation? The movement towards
the kosher kitchen was merely influenced by a wondermust I, a parenting mother,
impose the history of my family upon my children must I present towards them a
religion and culture to be passed down and appreciated? The author declares her
movement towards the keeping of a kosher kitchen as being caused by three separate
entitiesidentity (as tied to Jewish culture), spiritual purpose (connected to the Jewish
religion), and rhythm (better understood as consistency) (Ehrlich 53-54). And so she
begins her journey, deciding she might as well move towards a kosher kitchen (frequently
thinking why not? to herself). Through her husbands mother, along with a couple
other mentoring family members (such as Aunt Selina), yet most importantly her mother-
in-law Miriam, she embarks on a culinary voyage that takes her above and beyond. The
authors curiosity, enthusiasm, and cluelessness is portrayed as she jots down recipe notes
What decisions must she make in the process? First and foremost, there is
patience and organization. The author is overwhelmed with the implications behind an
idea so vast that it can make nearly anyone despair. What are these implications? The
and pans are necessary for everything that needs to be cooked (meat, dairy, and pareve).
She then has another issue to face, that of cooking itself, which, also through patience and
the avoidance of argument and altercation, she can possibly learn from Miriam (though
she rarely does get angry in the kitchen). On top of the sacrifices she has to take related to
organization, her next is the sacrifice she has to take in obeying the law, in feeling
obliged to observe. With that said, we ultimately have her final decision she is forced
to make; must she enter into this separate religious world, a traditional world accustomed
to and causally derived and decided from her heart? The authors possibility of moving
towards a kosher kitchen successfully is given to her (organization and cooking ability is
not the issue), but there still lies the feeling of entering into a separate world from the
secular one she normally exists in, the one she lives her everyday American life in. She
felt she needed to have assimilated into this everyday world in the first place, and to
throw away her old world and old past. This not being so dissimilar to the situation she
was in when she tried passionately not to regret the physical throwing away of the
notable suitcase and various other items which were for so long located in her basement
(Ehrlich 90-91).
So what does keeping a kosher kitchen mean to the author? This can be simply
answered through two means: the idea of religion and the idea of culture. The authors
intentions behind keeping a kosher kitchen involve the latter. There is a major difference
that is even expressed explicitly in the narrative, between that of the lesser-involved
religious means and the more involved cultural means. In the beginning, there was an
emphasis on the fine line between obligation and personal interest. A quote in the book
regards these claims: You dont keep kosher to honor emotion, or even for historys
sake. You do it to keep a commandment. You shouldnt romanticize. (Ehrlich 17). Thus,
the author, stuck between two familial extremes (the atheist ideological upbringing from
her own Marxist father vs. the polar opposite, strict orthodoxy of her religious mother-in-
law), is motivated towards the idea of a kosher kitchen mostly from personal interest,
Thus, our questions have been answered thoroughly and clearly. A tradition must
of mere consistencys sake. Choices are madepatience is required for the author, the
need of it deriving from the stresses of organization, obligation, and observance, while
the sacrifice of secular separation still remains. Lastly, the fine line between
commandment and desire is brought up, where the author is caught between the need of
maintaining a completely religious take towards the idea of kosher, and the contrasting
serves (pun intended) a well-balanced experience (meal) of sweet and sour memoirs,
included along with them more than enough recipes to secure your taste buds future.
Works Cited
Ehrlich, Elizabeth. Miriam's Kitchen: A Memoir. New York, N.Y., U.S.A: Viking, 1997.
Print.