Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(a) To obtain reasonable assurance about whether the F. S. as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, thereby enabling the
auditor to express an opinion on whether the F.S. are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with an applicable FRF.
(b) To report on the F.S. and communicate as required by the SAs, in accordance with the auditors findings.
Initial audit Engagement Recurring Audit Mngt. request for changes in terms
Limitations Imposed by mngt. No Limitations Imposed by Mngt. Determine its effect on Level of
Determine requirements w.r.t.:
Assurance & reasonable
(a) Revision of terms of Engagement; &
Do not accept unless required Ascertain existence of Justification
by law Preconditions* (b) Remind the entity of existing terms
Preconditions for an audit Exist Not Exist Required Not Required Auditor Satisfied Not Satisfied
1. Determine whether the FRF is
acceptable.
Accept Audit Discuss matter Send New No Further Duty Record New Do not
2. Obtain agreement of mngt that it Terms in
with mngt. Engagement Letter accept the
understands its responsibilities for: Engagement changes
(a) Preparation of F.S. Letter
(b) Exercising necessary Internal
Do not accept audit in case of: CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING REVISION IN TERMS Mngt. not
Controls to enable the
(a) Unacceptable FRF Indications that the entity misunderstands the objective and permit the
preparation of F.S. that are free
scope of the audit. auditor to
from material misstatements. or continue
Revised or special terms of engagement.
(c) To provide the auditor: (b) Mngt. does not agree with Recent change of senior management.
Access to all relevant info. responsibilities Significant change in ownership.
Additional info that auditor Withdraw &
Significant change in nature or size of the entitys business.
requests from mngt. Report to
Change in legal or regulatory requirements.
Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg appropriate
Unrestricted access to persons Change in FRF adopted in the preparation of the F.S.
authority
within the entity. A change in other reporting requirements.
Objective: Implement QC Policies that provide Reasonable Assurance that audit complies with professional standards and audit report issued is appropriate
General concepts Form, Content & Extent of Specific Documentation Retention Ownership
Documentation Period
Documentation is the
Meaning: Record of: Auditor shall prepare audit documentation
property of the Auditor.
Audit procedures performed that is sufficient to enable an experienced 7 Years from May at his discretion
Relevant audit evidence
auditor to understand: date of Audit make portions of or
obtained, &
(a) NTE of the audit procedures; Report extracts from
Conclusions reached Compiled by: CA.
(b) Results of audit procedures performed, documentation available
Pankaj Garg
Purpose: includes the following: & audit evidence obtained; to client.
Assist in Planning and
(c) Significant matters arising during the
performance of Audit.
audit and the conclusions reached Documentation of Documentation of Documentation of
Direction, supervision &
Review of work. thereon, significant professional Discussion Departure from a matters arising after the
To fix accountability. judgments made in the reaching those relevant requirement Date of Auditors Report
Record for future reference. conclusions.
Quality control review and Factors affecting form, content & extent Significant Reasons for the Circumstance
inspections Matters departure. encountered.
1. The size and complexity of the entity.
Conduct of external Discussed with Alternative New or additional
inspections. 2. The nature of the audit procedures to be
Mngt. And procedures procedures
performed. TCWG. performed. performed, audit
Nature documentation must 3. Identified RMM. When and with evidence obtained,
provide for: 4. Significance of audit evidence obtained. whom the conclusions reached,
Sufficient and appropriate 5. Nature & extent of exceptions identified. discussion took and their effect on the
record of the basis for place. auditors report.
6. Need to document a conclusion or the
auditors report. How the auditor When and by whom
basis for a conclusion not readily
Evidence that the audit was address the the changes to audit
determinable from the documentation of
planned and performed in inconsistency (if documentation were
the work performed or audit evidence any detected made and reviewed.
accordance with SAs & other
obtained. during
regulatory requirements.
7. The audit methodology and tools used. discussion)
Meaning: Intentional Act involving use of deception to Incentive or pressure to Commit Fraud: Primary responsibility To obtain reasonable assurance
obtain an unjust or illegal advantage. Arises when mngt is under pressure to for prevention & that F.S. as a whole are free from
achieve an unrealistic target. detection of fraud rests material Misstatements.
Auditor is concerned with Fraud that causes Perceived opportunity to do so: with Mngt and TCWG
Arises when an individual believes that Maintain an attitude of
Material Misstatement.
internal control can be overridden. To ensure prevention of Professional Skepticism
Misstatement may result from: Rationalization to do so: fraud Mngt. must have an
A Fraudulent Financial Reporting Arises when an individual possess an commitment to create an Circumstances indicate existence of
1. Recording fictitious journal entries to attitude or character that allows them material Misstatement
culture of honesty and
manipulate operating results. knowingly and intentionally to commit a
Ethical behavior.
2. Inappropriate assumptions. dishonest act.
3. Changing judgements to estimate account Consider whether such a
balances. Risk associated for non detection of material misstatements misstatement is an indication of
4. Omitting, advancing or delaying recognition of Fraud. If Fraud identified
Due to Inherent limitations there is always an unavoidable risk of material
events and transactions occurred during the misstatement in F.S. due to Fraud.
year. Risk of non detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is Communicate to Mngt.
5. Concealing facts that affect the amount higher than the risk of non detecting one resulting from error. &TCWG (also to Regulatory &
recorded in F.S.
Risk of Material Misstatements due to Management Fraud is higher than Enforcement authorities, if
6. Engaging in Complex Transactions that are
due to Employee Fraud. required by Law
structured to misrepresent the financial
position or financial performance.
Conditions or events which increases risk of fraud or error Auditor unable to complete the
7. Altering records relating to significant
1. Discrepancies in Accounting Records: arises due to improper recording, engagement.
transactions.
unauthorised transactions, last minute adjustments.
B Misappropriation of Assets
2. Conflicting or missing evidences: missing documents, altered Consider the Possibility of
1. Embezzling receipts. withdrawing.
documents, non availability of original documents, unexplained items etc.
2. Stealing physical assets.
3. Unusual relationship between auditor & mngt: undue time pressure,
3. Causing an entity to pay for goods and services
unusual delay in providing info, unwillingness to address weaknesses in IC. If withdraw:
not received.
4. Others: Mngt not allowing auditor to meet with TCWG, varied accounting Discuss with Mngt & TCWG, &
4. Using entity assets for personal use. Report to appropriate persons
policies, frequent changes in accounting estimates.
TCWG: Persons with Determine the Matters to be communicated Communication may be Size, operating structure,
responsibility for appropriate Oral /written control environment, & legal
overseeing the (a) Auditors responsibility in relate to F.S. Audit. Detail/Summarised structure of entity.
person to whom
(b) Planned scope & timing of audit Structured /Unstructured In the case of an audit of special
strategic directions & communication
(c) Significant findings from audit w.r.t. Should be in writing purpose F.S., whether the
obligations related to is to be made.
Accounting Policies auditor also audits the entitys
Accountability. when oral
Accounting Estimates general purpose F. S.
Management : Person communication is not
F. S. Disclosures Requirements of respective law
with executive adequate. specifying written
Significant difficulties encountered
responsibility for during the audit. Communication should communication with TCWG in a
conduct of entitys Examples of Significant difficulties be on timely basis prescribed form.
(a) Inability of I.C to prevent Identification of deficiencies in Communication of deficiencies in Internal Control
detect & correct misstatement ; Internal Control
or
Mode of communication Content of communication
(b) Absence of control necessary
Determine whether on the basis of
to prevent, detect & correct
work done any deficiency in In writing
misstatements internal control is identified
1. To devote appropriate attention to (a) Procedures required by SA -220 w.r.t. Establishment of Audit Strategy Development of
important areas. continuous of Client relationship. Audit Plan.
2. Identify and Resolve potential (b) Evaluate compliance with Ethical so as to set the scope, timing &
problems on timely basis. direction of the audit
Requirements (SA-220) NTE of RAP (SA-
3. Properly organized & managed Audit. Factors to be considered
(c) Understanding of terms of 315)
4. Assists selection of ET members with Characteristics of Engagement.
Engagement (SA-210) NTE of furthers
requisite capabilities and competence. Reporting Objectives.
5. Co-ordination of work done by Significant factors to direct ET Audit Procedures
auditors of components and experts. Planning A Continuous Process efforts. (SA-330)
6. Facilitating direction and supervision Result of Preliminary Other Planned
of Engagement team. Engagement Activities.
Audit Procedure.
NTE of Procedures to be
performed.
Planning is not a discrete phase of an audit but rather a continuous process. It begins shortly
CHANGES TO PLANNING DECISIONS
after completion of previous audit & continues until completion of current audit engagement.
Auditor shall update & change overall audit strategy and audit plan
It includes consideration of timing of certain activities & audit procedures that need to be
as necessary during the course of the audit.
completed prior to performance of further audit procedures. E.g., planning includes the need to Audit Strategy and Audit Plan may need to be modified as a result
consider, prior to the auditors identification and assessment of the RMM, such matters as: of unexpected events, changes in conditions, or the audit evidence
1. The analytical procedures to be applied as risk assessment procedures. obtained from the results of audit procedures.
Based on the revised consideration of assessed risks, auditor need
2. Obtaining a general understanding of the legal and regulatory framework.
to modify the NTE of further audit procedures. This may be the case
3. The determination of materiality.
Compiled by: when information comes to the auditors attention that differs
4. The involvement of experts. significantly from the information available when the auditor
CA. Pankaj Garg
5. The performance of other risk assessment procedures. planned the audit procedures.
Materiality is a subject of The amount set by auditor at (a) Upon establishing the overall audit strategy, the auditor shall
professional judgment and less than materiality for F.S as a whole determine the materiality for the F. S. as a whole.
discussion presented in FRF (b) Determine the materiality level for specific transactions for
to reduce to an appropriately low level
which misstatements of lower amount be expected to influence
provides a reference to the auditor in the probability that the aggregate of the
the economic decisions of users.
determining materiality. uncorrected & undetected misstatement (c) Determine the performance materiality for purpose of assessing
If FRF does not include a discussion, exceeds materiality for F. S. as a whole the RMM and determining the NTE of further audit procedures.
following can be referred:
(a) Misstatements including
omissions expected to influence Revision of Materiality Use of benchmark in determining Materiality
the surrounding circumstances. that would have caused auditor to have point in determining materiality for the F.S. as a whole.
(c) Common financial information determined a different amount initially, Factors affecting identification of appropriate benchmark
needs of the users as a group. auditor shall revise materiality for the F.S. as a 1. The elements of the financial statements;
whole & if required, for particular classes of 2. Items on which the attention of the users of the particular
transactions, account balances or disclosures. entitys financial statements tends to be focused;
Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg
If the auditor concludes that a lower 3. The nature of the entity, where the entity is at in its life
materiality than that initially determined is cycle, and the industry and economic environment in
Judgment of materiality provides a
appropriate, the auditor shall determine which the entity operates;
basis for:
whether it is necessary to revise performance 4. The entitys ownership structure and the way it is
(a) Determination of NTE of RAP
materiality, and whether the NTE of the financed; and
(b) Identifying and assessing RMM.
further audit procedures remain appropriate. 5. The relative volatility of the benchmark.
(c) NTE of further audit procedures.
Procedures designed to evaluate the operating effectiveness of controls in preventing, Procedures designed to detect material misstatements at assertion level.
detecting or correcting material misstatements at assertion level. It comprises of:
a) Test of details (of classes of transactions, Account Balances and
Obtain audit evidences w.r.t. (a) Application of controls (b) Consistency of application Disclosures); &
(c) By whom & by what means they applied Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg
b) Substantive Analytical Procedures
Special Considerations Factors warranting re-test of as 2. Ability or Willingness of intended confirming part to
Using Audit Evidence obtained in Interim Period: controls substantive respond.
Obtain audit Evidence for significant changes 1. Deficient control environment. procedures 3. Objectivity of Intending Party.
subsequent to Interim Period. 2. Deficient monitoring of
Closing Reconciling F.S. with underlying A/cing Records
controls.
Determine the additional Evidence to be obtain for Process
3. Significant manual element to Examine Material Journal Entries & other adjustments
remaning period.
relevant controls. made during the course of preparing the F.S.
Using Audit Evidence obtained during previous
4. Personnel changes that Significant Procedures that are specifically responsive to that risk
audits: Establish Continuing relevance of that evidence significantly affect the
by determining significant changes subsequent to Risks needs to be applied
application of control.
previous audit 5. Changing circumstances that
Changes occurs: Test the controls in current audit indicate the need for changes
No Change Occurs: Test the controls once in three in the control. Timing: When Substantive procedures are applied for interim period, the
audits 6. Deficient general IT-controls. auditor shall cover remaining period by appropriate procedures
Obtain an The user auditor shall obtain an User auditor shall evaluate the design and implementation of relevant controls of
understanding of understanding of how user entity uses the user entity that relate to the services provided by service organization.
nature & significance User auditor shall determine whether a sufficient understanding of nature and
services of a service organization in the user
of service provided by significance of services provided by service organization and their effect on the
entity operation, including:
the S.O. and their user entity internal control relevant to the audit has been obtained.
(a) Nature of service provided by the S.O. and If user auditor is unable to obtain a sufficient understanding from the user entity,
effect on the users
entity internal control significance of services to user entity. user auditor shall obtain that understanding from the following procedures:
relevant to the audit, (b) Nature and materiality of the transactions (a) Obtaining a Type 1 or Type 2 Report, if available.
(b) Contacting the service organization, through the user entity.
sufficient to identify processed or financial reporting processes
(c) Visiting the service organization.
and assess the RMM. affected by service organizations.
(d) Using another auditor to perform procedures that will provide the
To design and (c) Degree of interaction between activities of necessary information about the relevant controls at the S.O.
perform audit
S.O. and those of the user entity. If a S.O. uses subservice organisation, the service auditors report may either
procedures
(d) The nature of relationship between user include or exclude the subservice organisations relevant control objectives
responsive to those
& related controls in the service organisations description of its system & in
risks. entity and the service organization.
the scope of service auditors engagement. These two methods of reporting
are known as the inclusive method and the carve-out method, respectively.
User Auditor: An auditor who audits and Reports on the financial If Type 1 or Type 2 report excludes the controls at a subservice
statements of a user entity. organisation, and the services provided by the subservice organisation are
relevant to the audit of the user entitys financial statements, the user
User Entity: An Entity that uses a service organization and whose financial
auditor is required to apply the requirements of this SA in respect of the
statements are being audited. subservice organisation.
Type 1 Report: Report on the description and design of internal controls at Nature and extent of work to be performed by the user auditor regarding
a service organization for a specified date. the services provided by a subservice organisation depend on the nature
and significance of those services to the user entity and the relevance of
Type 2 Report: Report on the description, design and operating
those services to the audit.
effectiveness of controls at a service organsation for a specified period.
Difference between Accumulate the misstatements other than those that clearly trivial
Meaning and Nature of Auditors duties when an information to be used as audit evidence Audit Procedures & Methods
Audit Evidence (A.E.) for obtaining audit evidence
Meaning of A.E. Information prepared using Information Procedures to obtain A.E. Methods to obtain A.E.
Information used by auditor work of Management Expert Produced by entity (a) RAP 1. Inspection
(b) FAP (Responses): 2. Observation.
In arriving at the conclusion Tests of Control (ToC), 3. External Confirmations
1 Evaluate Competence, Capability and Obtain A.E. about the
Objectivity of the Expert Substantive 4. Recalculation
On which auditors opinion is Source of Information for evaluation: 1. Tests of Details (ToD) 5. Re-performance
Accuracy and
based. Personal Experience with previous work. 2. Substantive Analytical 6. Analytical procedures
Completeness of info.
Discussion with that expert.
Nature of A.E. Procedures (SAP) 7. Inquiry (Oral/Written)
Discussion with others. Evaluate whether info
A.E. needs to be Knowledge of experts qualification, is
memberships, other forms of recognitions.
Published books or papers. Reliability of Audit Evidence
Sufficient Appropriate sufficiently precise
Auditors expert.
Measure of Measure of and detailed for
2 Obtain an understating of expert work
quantity quality auditors purposes.
Area of Specialty
Affected by Relevance & Applicable professional standards.
RMM & reliability in Legal & Regulatory Requirements. (a) External Evidences are considered more reliable than internal evidences.
Quality of providing Assumptions and Methods used.
(b) The reliability of internal evidence is increased when the related controls, imposed
Nature of Source Data used.
Audit support for by entity are effective.
3 Evaluate the appropriateness of Expert work
evidences conclusion. (c) Audit evidence obtained directly by the auditor is more reliable than audit
Finding & Conclusion Relevance,
Reasonableness & Consistency with other evidence obtained indirectly.
A.E. (d) Audit evidence in documentary form, is more reliable than evidence obtained
Compiled by: Assumptions and Methods Relevance
orally.
and Reasonableness.
CA. PANKAJ GARG (e) Audit evidence provided by original documents is more reliable than audit
Source Data Relevance, Completeness
and accuracy. evidence provided by photocopies.
Meaning & Type of E.C. External Confirmation Audit Procedures in Special Circumstances Limited use of ve
Procedures Request
Mngt. refuses to allow the auditor to send request
Audit Evidence obtained as a direct written As it provides less
Determining the information to
response to auditor from 3rd Party in Inquire the reasons persuasive evidence
be confirmed.
Paper/Electronic/Other form. Evaluate the implications on RMM than the positive
Selecting the Appropriate Third Perform Alternative Audit procedure. Confirmation request.
2 Types Party. Refusal appears to Communicate to
be unreasonable TCWG.
+ ve Request - ve request Designing the confirmation
Circumstances in
request. Unable to collect Determine its affect
Request that 3rd Party Request that 3rd Party
which negative
respond directly to respond directly to audit evidence on Opinion
Sending the request including request may be used
auditor auditor
follow up. Responses to E.C. request as sole substantive
indicating whether it only if it disagrees
agrees or disagrees Creates Doubt Obtain Further procedure:
With the info in request with the information in Factors to be considered while Evidences
Low RMM.
or the request designing E.C. request: Not Reliable Consider its affect on
providing requested Population consists
Assertions being addressed. NTE of other procedures
info. of large no. of small,
Specific identified RMM. No Response Perform Alternative
homogenous
Areas where External Confirmation may be obtained: Layout and presentation of procedure
(a) Bank balance & Other confirmation from account balances.
request.
Unable to collect Determine its affect on
bankers Expectation of low
Prior Experience of audit.
(b) Account Receivable/Account Payable Balances evidence Opinion
Method of Communication. exception rate.
(c) Stock Lying with Third Parties Exception occurs Investigate to determine
Management Authorization. Auditor not aware
(d) Property Title Deed held by third parties
misstatement of circumstances
(e) Investments Purchased but delivery not taken. Ability of confirming party to
(f) Loan from Lenders provide the requested that 3rd party
(g) Terms of agreement or Transaction with Third information Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg disregard request.
Parties
Read most recent F.S. and auditor Obtain SAAE Evaluate the Unable to Contain material Inconsistency Modification remains
report thereon. effect of obtain SAAE misstatements not exists relevant & material for
Obtain S.A. audit evidence w.r.t. modification properly or Current Period F.S.
existence of any material accounted / Changes not
Determining application of
appropriate accounting policies. w.r.t.
Modify Current Year
If any misstatement detected consistent
Qualified / Audit Report
perform additional procedures to application
Disclaimer Qualified / Adverse Report accordingly
determine their effect on current or
Period financial statements. Proper
If misstatement exists in Current accounting & in assessing Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg
Period F.S. communicate to Mngt & disclosure for RMM in Current
TCWG. changes. period F.S.
Evaluation of financial information 1 Determine the suitability of particular substantive analytical procedures (SAP)
Following factors requires consideration:
through analysis of relationships
1. SAPs more suitable to large volumes of transactions tending to be predictable over time.
2. But suitability of AP influenced by:
among both financial and non-financial data.
AND Nature of assertion.
also encompass such investigation as is necessary of Auditors assessment of APs effectiveness to identify material misstatement.
identified fluctuations or relationships that are 3. In some cases unsophisticated predictive models may be useful.
inconsistent with other relevant information or that 4. Different types of APs provide different levels of assurance.
differ from expected values by a significant amount. 5. Particular SAP may be considered suitable when ToD are performed on same assertion.
Analytical Procedures
2 Evaluate the reliability of data
Following factors affects the reliability:
Consideration of Consideration of
Source of the information available.
Comparisons of relationships among
Financial Information Comparability of the information available. Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg
with comparable Elements of financial Nature and relevance of the information available, and
information for prior information Controls over the preparation of the information
periods. or 3 Develop an expectation of recorded amounts or ratios and evaluate whether the expectation is
or Financial information sufficiently precise to identify material misstatement.
with anticipated results and relevant non-
4 Determine the amount of any difference of recorded amounts from expected values that is
of the entity financial information.
acceptable without further investigation.
or
Auditors expectations 5 Investigating Results of Analytical Procedures
or If auditor identified fluctuations or relationships that are inconsistent with other relevant information
Similar industry or differ from expected values by a significant amount, the auditor shall investigate such differences by:
information. (a) Inquiring of management; and
(b) Performing other audit procedures as necessary in the circumstances.
Application of audit procedures to < Risk that auditors conclusion based on a sample may be different from 1 Sample design, size and selection of items
100 % of items within a population. the conclusion if the entire population were subjected to same audit (i) While designing, consider the purpose of
procedure. the audit procedure and the
Types of Sampling
characteristics of the population.
(a) Statistical Sampling: An
(ii) Sample size should be sufficient to
approach to sampling that has the
reduce sampling risk to an acceptably
following characteristics: Test of Tests of details Compiled by: low level.
Random selection of the controls CA. Pankaj Garg (iii) Selection should be in such a way that
sample items; and each sampling unit in the population has
a chance of selection.
The use of probability
Controls are Material Affects audit 2 Perform audit procedures
theory to evaluate sample
more effective misstatements does effectiveness and is (i) Perform audit procedures, appropriate
results, including
to the purpose, on each item selected.
than they not exist when in more likely to lead to
measurement of sampling (ii) If the audit procedure is not applicable
actually are fact it does. an inappropriate
risk. to selected item, perform the procedure
audit opinion. on a replacement item.
(b) Non Statistical Sampling: A
sampling approach that does not (iii) If the auditor is unable to apply designed
audit procedures/alternative procedure
have characteristics of random Controls are Material Affects audit to a selected item, consider that item as
selection and use of probability
less effective misstatement exists efficiency as it would a deviation.
theory is considered non-
than they when in fact it does lead to additional 3 Evaluation of results of audit sampling
statistical sampling. To determine whether the use of audit
actually are not work to establish
that initial sampling has provided a reasonable basis
for conclusions about the population that
conclusions were
has been tested.
incorrect.
Objective of Auditor: To obtain SAAE whether (a) AE including Fair Value AE are reasonable; and (b) related disclosures in the F.S. are adequate.
Events occurring between the date of F.S. and the date of Auditors report Facts that become known to Auditor after date of Auditors report
(i) Perform procedures to obtain SAAE that all events which require adjustment / Before issue of F.S. After issue of F.S.
disclosure have been identified. 1. In general Auditor has no obligation. 1. In general Auditor has no obligation.
2. However, in case of significant 2. However, in case of significant
(ii) For the purpose of determining nature and timing of procedures, auditor may:
matter matter
(a) Obtain the understanding of procedures applied by mngt for identification of
Discuss with Management Discuss with Management
significant events. Determine need to amend F.S.
Determine need to amend F.S.
(b) Inquire the Management as to Occurrence of subsequent events which may Inquire how mngt intends to
Inquire how mngt intends to
affect the F.S. address the matter in F.S.
address the matter in F.S.
(c) Read the Minutes of Meetings that held after the B/S date. 3. If Mngt. amend the F.S. audior shall
3. If Mngt. amend the F.S. auditor shall
Carry out procedures on
(d) Study the Interim Financial Statements, if any. Extent procedures to date of new amended F.S.
(iii) If auditor identifies any event which require any adjustment/disclosure, he should report, and Review the steps taken by mngt
ensure its appropriate treatment in F.S. provide a new auditor report on to ensure that recipient of F.S.
(iv) Obtain a WR from the Mngt. that all known events have been appropriately amended F.S. are informed of the situation.
adjusted/disclosed, as the case may be. or provide a new auditor report on
Amend the audit report to amended F.S.
Specific Inquiries to be made from management include an additional date or
1. Whether new commitments, borrowings or guarantees have been entered into. restricted to that amendment Amend the audit report to
and include an EOM/OMP. include an additional date
2. Whether sales or acquisitions of assets have occurred or are planned.
4. If mngt refuses to amend the F.S. restricted to that amendment
3. Whether there have been increases in capital or issuance of debt instruments.
Modify the report if not yet and include an EOM/OMP.
4. Whether any assets have been appropriated by government or destroyed. 4. If mngt refuses to amend the F.S.
5. Whether there have been any developments regarding contingencies. provided to entity.
Notify to mngt and TCWG, that
6. Whether any unusual accounting adjustments have been made. If report already issued, notify to
the auditor will seek to prevent
7. Whether any events have occurred that will bring into question the appropriateness mngt and TCWG not to issue F.S. reliance on Auditors Report.
of accounting policies used in the F.S.. to third parties. If mngt/TCWG does not take
8. Whether any events have occurred that are relevant to the measurement of If mngt still issues F.S., take necessary steps, take appropriate
estimates or provisions made in the F.S. appropriate action to prevent action to prevent reliance on
9. Whether any events have occurred that are relevant to the recoverability of assets. reliance on auditors report. auditors report.
A written statement by Matters for which WR may be obtained Auditor Responses in different Situations
Management
Management responsibilities
or
In accordance with applicable management about competence and
to support other audit evidence. FRF. Re-evaluate the reliability integrity of mngt, determine
WR recognized as audit evidence (b) Information provided to and integrity of management. their effect in reliability of
as a response to inquiries. 1 Auditor: Determine possible effect on WR and other audit
WR do not provide SAAE as agreed in terms of the opinion. evidence in general.
WR should be in the form of a engagement Issue disclaimer of opinion. IF WR inconsistent with
representation letter addressed (c) Description of management other evidences, perform
to Auditor. Responsibilities: additional procedures.
WR shall be obtained for all In the manner as described in If conclude that WR is not
Compiled by:
financial statements and terms of engagement reliable, determine possible
period(s) referred in Auditors As required by other SA CA. Pankaj Garg
effect on audit opinion.
Report. Or In case of sufficient doubt
Others
1. Consider the professional competence of Other 1. Components whose FS are 1. Sufficient liaison/co- 1. Express a qualified /
Auditor, if Other Auditor is not a member of ICAI. audited by Other Auditor ordination between Principal disclaimer of opinion
2. Visit component and examine books of account, if and Other auditor. because of scope
and their significance to
limitation:
essential. the financial information
2. Principal auditor may require
If Principal Auditor
3. Obtain sufficient appropriate evidence, that work of Other Auditor to answer a
of the entity as a whole. concludes that he
Other Auditor is adequate for Principal Auditor's detailed questionnaire.
2. Names of the other cannot use the work of
purposes. 3. Other Auditor should
auditors. Other Auditor;
4. Discuss audit procedures applied by Other Auditor. coordinate with Principal
3. Any conclusions reached PA unable to perform
5. Review a written summary of Other Auditors Auditor:
sufficient additional
that individual Adhering to time-table.
procedures and findings through
procedures regarding
questionnaires/checklist. components are not Bringing to the attention of
FI of the component
6. Consider significant findings of Other Auditor: material. PA any significant finding.
audited by OA.
Discuss audit findings with OA and Mgt. of 4. Procedures performed Compliance with relevant
2. Report should state
component. regarding components. statutory requirements.
clearly division of
Perform supplemental tests if necessary. 5. Conclusions reached. Respond to detailed
responsibility
questionnaire.
7. In case Other Auditor is not a professionally qualified 6. Manner of dealing with between PA and OA.
auditor - for instance, where a component is situated in Modified Report of Other
foreign country: Auditor while finalising
Procedures mentioned above assume added Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg
Principal Auditors Report.
importance.
Meaning & scope of Relationship External Auditors Procedures w.r.t. Evaluation of Internal Audit Documentatio
Internal Audit Function between Internal
Audit Function & Conclusions regarding the
Meaning Determine evaluation & adequacy of
External Auditor
An appraisal activity. work.
independent of entity. of i nte rna l a udi t ors; Nature of specific technical training & proficiency.
External auditor has Prof essi ona l c a re w i th work performed by Work was properly supervised,
Scope of Internal Audit:
sole responsibility for w hi c h the i nte rna l Internal Auditor. reviewed & documented.
Monitoring of I. C.
audit opinion, and a udi tors w orks; a nd Assessed RMM. Adequate audit evidence obtained
Examination of financial
that responsibility not C ommuni c a ti on Degree of subjectivity by Internal auditor.
& operating information.
reduced by use of betw ee n i nte rna l in evaluation of audit Conclusions reached are
Review of operating
work of internal a udi tors & e xte rna l evidence by internal appropriate & reports prepared by
activities.
auditors. a udi tor. auditor. internal auditors are consistent
Review of compliance
with the results of work performed.
with laws & regulations.
Exceptions / unusual matters
Risk management. Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg disclosed by Internal Auditor are
Governance.
properly resolved.
Meaning of Auditors Expert Procedures to be followed while using the work of auditors expert
An individual or organisation 1 Determining need for an Auditors Expert 4 Agreement with Auditors Expert
possessing expertise in field An auditors expert may be needed to assist the auditor for the Need to be in writing and cover the followings:
followings: Nature, scope and Objectives of Auditors Expert
other than accounting/auditing,
Obtaining an understanding of entity & its environment, including IC. work.
whose work is used by the Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement. Respective Role and Responsibilities of Auditor
auditor Determining & implementing overall responses to assessed risks. and auditors Expert.
to assist the auditor in obtaining Designing and performing further audit procedures to respond to NTE of Communication including form of report.
SAAE. assessed risks. Confidentiality requirements to be observed by
Evaluating the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence
Auditors Expert.
obtained.
Areas where work of AE can be
2 Evaluate Competence, Capability and Objectivity of the Expert 5 Evaluate appropriateness of Expert work
used
Source of Information for evaluation: Finding & Conclusion Relevance,
Personal Experience with previous work.
Reasonableness & Consistency with other A.E.
Valuation of complex financial Discussion with that expert.
Discussion with other Auditors.
Assumptions and Methods Relevance and
instruments, L & B, P & M, jewelry,
Knowledge of experts qualification, memberships, other forms of Reasonableness.
works of art, antiques, intangible
recognitions. Source Data Relevance, Completeness and
assets, assets acquired and Published books or papers.
accuracy.
liabilities assumed in business Auditors firm Q. C. Policies and Procedures.
combinations and assets that may 3 Obtain an understating of expert work 6 Expert work not adequate for audit purposes
have been impaired. To enable the auditor to determine the nature, scope and If Auditor concludes that work of auditors expert is
objectives of that experts work for auditors purposes. not adequate for the auditors purposes and
Actuarial calculation of liabilities
Evaluate the adequacy of that work for the auditors auditor cannot resolve the matter through the
associated with insurance contracts
additional audit procedures,
or employee benefit plans. purposes.
it may be necessary to express a modified opinion.
Estimation of oil and gas reserves.
Valuation of environmental
liabilities, and site clean-up costs. Reference to the Auditors Expert in the Auditors Report
Interpretation of contracts, laws Compiled by: No reference required in case of unmodified Audit Report unless required by L & R.
and regulations. In case of modified reports, it may be appropriate to refer to the auditors expert, to
Analysis of complex or unusual tax CA. PANKAJ GARG
explain the nature of the modification. In such case, auditor may need the permission of
compliance issues.
the auditors expert before making such a reference..
Scope of SA 800: SA 800 deals with Special considerations in application of SAs in audit of F.S. (Complete set) prepared in accordance with SPF.
Objective of Auditor: to address appropriately special considerations w.r.t. (a) Engagement Acceptance (b) Planning & performance (c) Opinion & Reporting.
Engagement Acceptance Planning & Performing an Audit Engagement Forming an Opinion & Reporting
Meaning of Element Acceptance
Element means an element,
Application of SA (a) Adapt all SAs as necessary in the audit of SFS: Apply SA 700, as necessary.
account or item of a F.S.
SA 200 requires compliance with all SAs relevant (b) Careful consideration of relevance of each SA is If also engaged to report on full FS,
Single financial statement necessary. SAs such as SA 240, SA 550 and SA 570 are, issue separate reports.
to audit.
(for example, a CFS) or a in principle, relevant. This is because the element could If audited SFS published with audited
This applies to audit of Single F.S. even if the
specific element of a F.S. (for auditor also audits the complete F.S. be misstated as a result of fraud, the effect of related full FS, presentation of SFS should be
example, cash and bank differentiated from full FS.
If auditor not also engaged to audit the complete party transactions, or the incorrect application of the
Do not issue audit report on SFS
balances) includes the FS, consider the practicability of audit of Single going concern assumption under the applicable FRF.
until satisfied with differentiation.
related notes. F.S./Specific Element in accordance with SAs. (c) SAs are written in the context of an audit of F.S.; they
Acceptability of FRF are to be adapted as necessary in the circumstances Modified Opinion/EMP/OMP Para
Examples of Elements
when applied to the audit of a single F.S. or a specific on Full FS
1. Determine the acceptability of the FRF applied in
Accounts receivable, (a) Determine effect on Single F.S.
the preparation of Single F.S. element. For example, WR from mngt. about the
Allowance for doubtful (b) If appropriate, modify opinion on
2. Determine whether application of FRF will result complete set of F.S. would be replaced by WR about
accounts receivable, SFS/include EMP, OMP.
in presentation that provides adequate single F.S. or element in accordance with the applicable
Inventory, (c) If necessary to issue adverse/
disclosures to enable users to understand FRF.
disclaimer opinion on full FS,
Schedule of externally information conveyed in Single FS or element. (d) When auditing Single F.S. in conjunction with Full F.S.,
unmodified opinion on SFS cannot
managed assets Form of Opinion audit evidence obtained as part of audit of full F.S. may
be expressed.
Schedule of net tangible Expected form of opinion depends upon be useful but auditor needs to plan & perform audit of
(d) However for separate audit of
assets applicable FRF & applicable L&R. Single F.S. to obtain SAAE.
specific element, an unmodified
SA 210 requires that agreed terms of engagement (e) Some items from Complete FS may be interrelated with
Schedule of disbursement opinion can be expressed if:
include the expected form of report to be issued. element of F.S., auditor need to perform procedures on
in relation to a lease Not prohibited by L& R;
Consider whether expected form of opinion is interrelated items.
property, AR on element is not published
appropriate in the circumstances. (f) Materialities determined for a Single F.S. or for a
Schedule of profit together with AR on full FS; &
Auditors decision as to the expected form of specific element may be lower that materiality for full
Element does not constitute a
participation or employee opinion is a matter of professional judgment. F.S., this will affects NTE of audit procedures and the
major portion of full F.S.
bonuses. evaluation of uncorrected misstatements.
(a) Accept engagement only when also 1 EVALUATE Unmodified opinion shall be expressed on Summary F.S. if
engaged to audit, those F.S., from which SFS (a) Whether SFS adequately disclose
have been derived. their summarised nature & identify SFS are consistent, in all material respects, with audited FS, in accordance
(b) Before accepting Engagement, auditor audited FS. with applied criteria.
shall: (b) If SFS are not accompanied by
1. Determine acceptability of applied Special Considerations
audited FS, whether they clearly
criteria. Qualified 1. State that audit report on FS contains qualified
describe from whom or where
2. Obtain agreement of mngt that Opinion/EO opinion/EOM/OM para AND
audited FS are available;
acknowledges & understands its M/OM Para 2. Describe:
(c) Whether SFS adequately disclose
responsibilities: in Report on Basis for qualified opinion on audited FS, and that
the applied criteria.
For preparation of SFS in accordance Audited FS qualified opinion; or EOM/OM para; and
(d) Whether SFS are prepared in
with applied criteria; Effect thereof on SFS, if any.
accordance with applied criteria.
To make audited FS available to Adverse Report on SFS is required to include the following:
(e) Whether SFS contain necessary
intended users of SFS without undue Opinion/ 1. Statement that audit report contains
info & are appropriately
difficulty; and Disclaimer of adverse/disclaimer of opinion;
aggregated.
To include auditors report on SFS in Opinion on 2. Description of basis of such opinion; and
(f) Whether audited F.S. are available
any document that contains SFS and Audited FS 3. Statement that as a result of adverse/disclaimer of
to intended users without undue
that indicates that auditor has opinion it is inappropriate to express an opinion on
difficulty.
reported on them.
2 COMPARE SFS.
(c) Agree with the management the form of
SFS with related information in Modified Express adverse opinion
opinion to be expressed on the SFS.
audited F.S. to determine whether SFS Opinion on
(d) Do not accept engagement if:
agree with or can be re-calculated SFS if SFS are not consistent in all material respects with or
Criteria are not acceptable; or
from related information in audited are not a fair summary of audited FS in accordance with
unable to obtain management
F.S. applied criteria.
agreement.
CARO 2016 apply to all companies including foreign Para Reporting Area Reporting Requirements
companies except the following No.
3(i) Fixed Assets Whether proper records maintained.
(a) Banking Company Whether physical verification has been conducted at reasonable intervals by mngt.
(b) Insurance Company Whether material discrepancies noticed and if so, whether dealt properly in books.
(c) Company licensed to operate u/s 8 Title deeds of immovable properties are held in name of Co., if not provide details.
3(ii) Inventories Whether physical verification has been conducted at reasonable intervals by mngt.
(d) One Person Company
Whether material discrepancies noticed and if so, whether dealt properly in books.
(e) Small Company
3(iii) Loans and Advances Whether loans have been granted to companies, firms, LLP covered u/s 189. If so,
(f) Private limited Company (not being a subsidiary or (a) T & C are not prejudicial to the companys interest;
holding of public co) (b) Schedule of repayment of principal & payment of interest has been stipulated;
Paid up capital + Reserves & Surplus < 1Cr. (c) State the total amount overdue for > 90 days.
(as on Balance Sheet Date) 3(iv) Compliance of Provisions In respect of loans, investments, guarantees, and security
+ of Sec. 185 & 186 If not, provide the details thereof.
Total borrowings from Bank & F.I. < 1Cr. 3(v) Public Deposits Directives by RBI and Sec. 73 to 76 complied with. If not - nature of contravention.
(at any point of time during the FY) Order passed by CLB/RBI/Court/TribunalWhether complied with or not.
+ 3(vi) Cost Records Whether Specified u/s 148(1); whether accounts and records made and maintained.
Total revenue as disclosed in Schedule III < 10 Cr. 3(vii) Statutory Dues Whether undisputed PF, ESI, IT, ST, ST, Custom, Excise, VAT, cess & Other paid
(for the FY) regularly. If Not outstanding >6 months as on Balance Sheet Date.
W.r.t. disputed IT, ST, ST, Custom, Excise, VAT State Amount involved & forum
Important Notes 3(viii) Repayment of Dues Whether co. default in repayment of dues F.I., Bank, Govt., Debenture holders.
1. CARO not apply over audit report on Consolidated If Yes Nature and Amount of Default.
F.S. 3(ix) Money raised by public Whether money Raised by IPO/FPO/term Loans applied for stated purpose.
2. Provisions of CARO are equally applicable in case issue & term loans If Not details along with delay and subsequent ratification be reported.
of branches. 3(x) Fraud Whether any fraud by company or on company by its officers/employeesnoticed or reported.
3. Paid up capital includes equity as well as If Yes Nature and amount to be stated.
Preference. 3(xi) Managerial remuneration Whether managerial remuneration has been paid with requisite approvals u/s 197.
4. Reserves include all types of reserves & P & L If Not, amount involved and steps taken for securing refund to be reported.
Balance. 3(xii) Nidhi Companies Whether the net owned funds to deposits ratio 1:20.
5. All Loans (secured/unsecured, long term/short Whether 10% unencumbered term deposits maintained..
term, etc.) are to be considered and in aggregate. 3(xiii) Transaction with Whether transactions with related parties are in compliance with Sec. 177 & 188.
6. F.I. includes NBFC. Related Parties Whether details disclosed in F.S. as required by applicable AS.
7. Total Revenue comprises of Revenue from 3(xiv) Preferential Allotment Whether any preferential allotment of shares/FCD/PCD has been made.
Operations and Other Income. If so, whether Sec. 42 complied with and amount raised used for stated purpose.
If Not provide details of amount involved and nature of non compliance.
3(xv) Non cash transactions Whether co. has entered into non cash transactions with directors.
with Directors If so. Whether Sec. 192 has been complied with.
Compiled by: CA. Pankaj Garg
3(xvi) Registration with RBI Whether regn. required u/s 45IA of RBI Act, 1934. If So- whether regn. obtained.