Professional Documents
Culture Documents
improvement by:
i) Using various types of data to support pedagogical decision making
ii) Analysing and interpreting students performances data in order to identify the
known as Jelutong Secondary School with the motto Adopt and Adapt. One could say that
the school really started from scratch to become what it is today. The privilege of getting
brilliant students into our school was beyond our wildest dream. But with what we received,
our school was proudly achieved several milestones with its dedicated and committed
teachers through its successes and achievements of its students over its 55 years history.
The school started off with a humble beginning in January 1962 with 398 students (boys
and girls) in 11 classes. From then on, Jelutong Secondary School became a co-educational
English Medium school. The first principal was the late Mr. Keong Siew Tat. The students
are drawn from the various primary schools in Penang. It consisted of one block of double-
1
storey building and later in 1964, another double-storey building was built. In 1966, Jelutong
Secondary School flourished with another 2 blocks consisted of one lab and 12 classrooms.
Later in 1973, it is known as Sekolah Menengah Jelutong with the motto Berdikari dan
Berbakti.
The initial aim of the school was to serve as a secondary school for students who lived in
the neighbourhood. Those who were not admitted into Penang Free School or Georgetown
Secondary School were instead sent to Jelutong Secondary School. The students obtained
Jelutong Secondary School has come a long way from its humble beginning since its
establishment in 1962. Students and teachers come and go each year, but definitely SMK
Jelutong will always be there to provide education for our future generations.
Now, SMK Jelutong is a pioneer school for the transformation project known as Ground
focuses on under-performing school where the majority of the students are from poor
families and communities from poor social demographic and students who do not have the
opportunity to access or engage with the outside world. Teachers will be trained in
conducting 21st century learning for the students and at the same time implement the
Almost 100% of the English teachers in the school are optionists. Most of them are
experienced and qualified teachers who are eager to scaffold the students from zero to hero.
English teachers in our school are very enthusiastic to improve the outcome of learning for
students.
2
The School Support Plan was administered for 16 students from 5VK1 and the students
are from low to average level of proficiency. These students were chosen based on the
implementation of Pre-Test, on continuous writing. Basically, the students do not place much
asked to write a narrative essay and it was supposed to end with . I wish I had spent more
time with him. It is too late now. I marked the students scripts using the SPM marking
NAME PRE-TEST
MUHAMMAD ANAS B SAGUL HAMID 18
MUHAMMAD FAZARI B NAZRI 30
MUHAMMAD HAKIMI B MOHAMMAD
NAZARUDDIN 21
MUHAMMAD IZZUL HAFIZ B NOOR
HASHIM 17
NASHIM ALI BIN ABD RAHIM 20
ONG HWANG SOON 16
TAN SOON AIK TH
WAN MUHAMMAD AFIQ B AZMIN TH
CHEAH CHAI NEE 13
HEMADHARSHINI A/P SAGAYABRITTO 17
KOED CI YEN 20
LEE SOOK FEN TH
NOR LYDIAWATI BT ISHAK 39
NURUL FATIHAH BT MOHD ROSDI 24
SITI ROSDEYANA BT MOHD RODEY 21
YUKADARSINI A/P MAHENDRAKUMAR 19
modals, sentence structure, adjective of feelings and generating ideas. The gaps that I chose
to treat were adjective of feelings, vocabularies and generating ideas as they were more basic
4
The School Support Plan was carried out for six weeks starting in May. The duration of
time for each section is 80 minutes every week. The most common gaps identified in
students written data were adjective of feelings, vocabularies and generating ideas. Some
changes were made on the intervention plan compared to the initial plan after discussion with
For week 1, the teacher focused on introducing the adjective of feelings. The activities
that teacher had designed to address the problem on adjective of feelings for week 1 is Silent
Debate. Teacher started the session with charade. For starter, the students came to the front
and pick a paper that contains adjective of feelings. Then, the particular student acted out the
facial expression and the rest have to guess the expression. The teacher wrote out adjectives
on the board. For Silent Debate activity, in pairs the students were given a piece of paper
where they have to take turn to write out the adjective of feelings (debate). The students who
wrote the most adjectives is announced as the winner. After that, the students were given 6
minutes to do gallery walk to observe their friends ideas. For the follow-up activity, students
filled in the crosswords with adjective of feelings and find pair of synonyms for the
On week 2, the intervention lesson was started with an activity called Odd One Out.
This activity is a recap of the previous lesson on adjectives. The students were given 3
adjectives and students choose the one that is out. For the main activity, teacher showed four
short video clips on feelings. Each group have to fill in the combo map given with the
5
adjectives based on the short video clips. For the follow-up activity, the students filled in the
gaps with the adjectives from the box and then the students choose five adjectives and
WEEK 3 - VOCABULARIES
The awareness raising strategies for week 3 that has been applied was vocabularies.
Teacher exposed the students with various words to describe feelings. For the set induction,
the teacher carried out Just a Minute activity. The students are divided into 2 groups and a
word (describing feeling) is given. As a team, they have to think of other vocabularies to say
the word given and a volunteer from each team will list them out. As an evaluation of
understanding, students were given a worksheet on feelings. Then, they read and cross-check
with their shoulder partner. Teacher walked around and read it. Students were alert on their
friends mistakes.(Appendix 3)
WEEK 4 - VOCABULARIES
The activity that was designed for week 4 was on vocabularies. Each group role-played a
scene that was given to them. In group students listed down on a mini white board the feeling
that the characters showed during the role play. Later, students shared the vocabularies that
they listed with their friends. To further assess their understanding the teacher distributed a
worksheet. Students were able to identify the correct answer for each question. Teacher
rewarded students with a sticker for all their correct answers. Students had fun during this
lesson especially during the role play and took part actively. (Appendix 4)
6
On week 5, students were given a model of OREO. This model will help students to
brainstorm their points accordingly and organizing. O stands for opinion, R for reason, E for
examples and O for restate opinion. This will help the students to write a complete paragraph.
Students were able to write a short paragraph using adjective of feelings and vocabularies
pertaining to it. This model is extremely helpful for the students to write.
they have to brainstorm for ideas according to the description given in the template. Once
they finished, they have to present their product to their friends. They used five different
colours of pens to fill in the template. (opening-blue, build up-black, dilemma-red, resolution-
green, ending-purple). Unfortunately, they were not able to fulfil the task as the teacher
expected. Many students struggle to brainstorm for ideas to fill in the template accordingly. (A
ppendix 6)
The activities designed for week 7 is a simplified version from the previous task. The
teacher started the lesson by distributing short stories to each group whereby the students need
to come out with their own beginning or ending. Students share their story. Next, the teacher
conducted story chain with the students. Students were given a topic and in groups they have
to take turn to produce a complete story. The students were confident and able to generate
ideas.
During the activities, I assessed students informally when they were giving me the verbal
feedback to the questions asked and this was followed by formal assessment whereby they
7
had to do written work in the worksheets or exercise books. The implementation of this
activities encouraged my students to gain knowledge and improve on their writing skills.
The post test was administered on 31st July 2017. As for the post test, a similar question
was given to the students. The reason I chose a slightly similar question is to check the
8
students ability to write more detail and correctly. I marked the students scripts using the
SPM marking scheme. I review each student essay and identify the gaps. Based on my analysis,
its reveal that some of the students tend to make the same errors as in Pre-Test and some new
Difference
NAME PRE-TEST POST-TEST (+/-)
MUHAMMAD ANAS B SAGUL HAMID 18 20 2
MUHAMMAD FAZARI B NAZRI 14 16 2
MUHAMMAD HAKIMI B MOHAMMAD 24 3
NAZARUDDIN 21
MUHAMMAD IZZUL HAFIZ B NOOR
HASHIM 17 16 -1
NASHIM ALI BIN ABD RAHIM 20 21 1
ONG HWANG SOON 16 19 3
TAN SOON AIK 11 13 2
WAN MUHAMMAD AFIQ B AZMIN 17 21 4
CHEAH CHAI NEE 13 12 -1
HEMADHARSHINI A/P SAGAYABRITTO 17 22 5
KOED CI YEN 20 24 4
LEE SOOK FEN 17 16 -1
NOR LYDIAWATI BT ISHAK 38 39 2
NURUL FATIHAH BT MOHD ROSDI 22 24 2
SITI ROSDEYANA BT MOHD RODEY 21 22 1
YUKADARSINI A/P MAHENDRAKUMAR 19 24 5
9
The chart above shows the difference between pre-test and post-test. Based on the
result, 13 students were able to score more compare to the pre-test. However, there were 3
students who score lower than pre-test. This happen due to the students attitude who
From the analysis, students gaps in adjective of feelings shows improvement. In pre-test
only two students were able to use adjective of feelings, however it is increased after the
post-test. Ten students were able to use the adjective of feelings correctly after the
intervention activity.
10
No. of students that use right
word choice
Based on the analysis, students were able to add new vocabularies in their essay. In pre-
test, students used wrong word choices to write essay. However, 13 students were able to use
correct vocabularies. This shows that the intervention is extremely benefit the students in
11
Based on the analysis, students show a slight improvement in generating ideas. In pre-
test, students were not able to elaborate the points but in the post-test they were able to write 7 to
8 paragraph.
Overall, there is improvement in students writing. This reflects that the intervention
activities were very useful for the students to score marks in their writing. Although it was a
basic skill intervention, but there is a progress in students writing. The word count increased and
6.0 CONCLUSION
In the post-test, which was carried out on 31 st July 2017, new gaps were identified such
as tenses (present tense and past tense), spelling errors and punctuation. These need to be
more specific treatments can be carried out to address their weaknesses. As a result, I am sure
the students will be able to gain more confidence and also improve on their writing skills.
12
13
APPENDIC
ES
14