Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Zachariah E. Bingham
Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) brought an end to our nations longest sustained military
operation. During this time 2 million service members deployed in support of OEF and OIF.
(Pickett, 2015) A large amount of these deployed service members were exposed and
experienced direct combat and sustained threats. (Wangelin, 2014) The tactics used by our
enemies included gorilla style combat, roadside bombs (IEDs), and rocket propelled attacks.
This style of combat can result in high mortalities, increased risks for traumatic brain injury, and
posttraumatic stress (PTSD). Attacks like these can occur on a routine basis, causing constant
and increasing stress on combat troops. These risk factors cause mental health problems, which
lead to acute attacks or suicide. Understanding how mental healthcare and support benefits at
risk combat operators, may reduce the occurrence of mental health cases, and minimize the
Mental health problems among military personnel and veterans are quickly becoming an
increased problem. OIF and OEF veterans account for 1.9 million new personnel eligible for
care from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Of this 1.9 million, 57.2% received at
least a provisional mental health diagnosis, with the most common conditions being PTSD,
depressive disorders, and anxiety disorders. (Pickett, 2015) Even more alarming is Army data
showing suicide rates in combat zones have increased; as of 2007 30% Army suicides and 17%
of Marine suicides occurred in deployed settings. (Bryan, 2010) Suicides in the combat zone
have been credited to untreated mental illness, insomnia, substance abuse and the availability of
means. In an area where nearly all have access to firearms, 93% of suicides in combat zones are
from firearms, compared this to 52% of death by firearms while not deployed, shows how
or are pre-existing in the member prior to deployment to a combat zone. Furthermore a Navy
Bureau of Medicine and Surgery study found deployed personnel who receive in-theater
treatment for mental health problems were at high risk for post deployment mental disorders.
(Conway, 2016). This begs the question of what kind of care are they service members
receiving while in the area of operation (AOR), and who is tracking their care while deployed
and once returned home? Deployed service members have limited access to mental health
facilities, medications and behavioral health specialists. In combat zones, specialized services
such as substance abuse treatment, inpatient psychiatric units, and family therapy simply do not
exist.(Bryan, 2010) Combat service members may not have the facilities to successfully fill
their needed medications, and in some cases the medications they need (sedatives) cannot be
taken due to the altered mental status the cause.(Bryan, 2010) Group therapy has show to be a
good option, as it targets a larger amount of at risk members. However group therapy models,
which benefit the patient after multiple sessions, can have limited effectiveness in the combat
zones due to the difficulty of getting off work. Trouble getting time off to seek and attend
therapeutic groups were cited by many deployed service members. (Bryan, 2010) Even if these
members are able to access therapeutic groups or medications, the member then returns to
combat and stressful situations, exposing them to higher risks of experiencing additional
traumatic events than if medically discharged (in a non combat setting). (Wangelin, 2014)
One positive service in its early stages of development is called Prolonged Exposure (PE)
therapy. Accessed via telehealth, PE is regarded as the most widely used and evaluated protocol
for military members with PTSD. (Wangelin, 2014) According to Dr. Bethany Wangelin, a staff
repeated and prolonged imaginable exposure involving vividly revisiting the traumatic event in
memory, and processing of exposure activities, in which memories and meaning of the event are
discussed with the therapist. Research shows the positive impact of PE on veterans seeking care
back home, and military health officials are confidant PE telehealth technology could become a
valuable mechanism for providing treatment for deployed military members. (Wangelin, 2014)
When compared to the services and requirements established by Healthy People 2020
(HP2020) the Department of Defenses (DOD) programs in combat theaters is lacking in some
areas. Mental Health and Mental Disorder (MHMD) 5 requires that of primary care facilities
that provide mental health treatment onsite. (MHMD, 2016) Currently there are only select
bases in the combat theater that have mental health facilities. In most cases members assessed
for being at risk for mental health problems or suicide are sent o Combat Support Hospitals
(CSH). These are not inpatient psychiatric units, rather a place where the member can be kept
safe awaiting his or her transport out of the AOR. These CSHs do not have the resources or
manning to meet adequate standards for inpatient psychiatric care. (Bryan, 2010)
Answering the call to reduce suicide rates, in line with MHMD 1, the DOD has began to
look into the effects on insomnia, agitation and nightmares occurring in combat members. By
better understanding how to treat these symptoms, the DOD feels they can use and adapt
evidence-based interventions to reduce the suicide rates down range. One concept they have
adopted is the idea of belongingness. Instituting social responsibly paradigm that capitalizes
on taking care of one another, the DODs wingman or battle buddy concept creates a sense
of unity and reducing the feelings of decreased belongingness, which is associated with suicide
and returned to their respective units. This is a major change, in an effort to fight the stigma
associated with mental health in the military. Inline with MHMD 8 the military no longer sends
those at risk to treatment, followed by a medical discharge. The DOD now uses a Unit Watch
program to allow commanders and clinicians to use social support net works to manage
members during crisis and after recovery. (Bryan, 2010) There is no longer any punitive actions
or terminations as a result of a mental health illness. These strategies minimize stigmas, and
match the MHMD 8 that requires an increase the proportion of persons with serious mental
The World Health Orginzations (WHO) Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan
(CMHAP) provides the world with numerous mental health objectives for countries to use as
templates to design mental health plans for their respected countries. The DOD has many
programs and initiatives that meet and mirror those established by the WHO. Objective 3 of
the WHO CMHAP implements strategies for promotion and prevention in mental health. The
DOD has been successful in creating programs to allow for promotion and prevention of mental
health. Although the mental health programs in combat zones are not as efficient as the DOD
would like, home station programs can be effective when targeting members getting ready to
deploy. The Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery found pre-deployment mental health
screening may prevent the deployment of many individuals with the highest risk of ongoing
adjustment problems. (Conway, 2016) This data is what drives the DOD to implement
strategies to prevent these members from going into combat, allowing them to remain at their
mental health around the globe. WHO asks that evidence-based practice: Mental health
strategies and interventions for treatment, prevention and promotion need to be based on
scientific evidence and/or best practice, taking cultural considerations into account. Using
independent studies, and those conducted by the VA and DOD, initiatives and preventions have
been made to reduce mental health disparities and suicides. One such implementation is the use
of telehealth PE in the combat zone. Evidence based practice shows the impact PE has on
veterans suffering from PTSD at home station and within the VA. Offering services to combat
troops provides a source of recovery for all, with no regard to culture, beliefs or location in
theater.
One important WHO action plan that the DOD will have difficulty measuring up to is the
reduction of access to means of suicide. According to the WHO the major means are
pesticides, firearms, certain medications. (Suicide, 2016) The DOD understands this measure
to be extremely difficult to overcome. The Journal of Military Medicine states The difficulty
in limiting access to firearms and other potentially lethal method for suicide is arguably one of
the most significant barriers to suicide prevention in combat zones. (Bryan, 2010) Due to this
case, suicidal ideations and expressions are not taken lightly, and commanders are given
explicate rights to medically evacuate serves members from the combat zone to maintain safety.
Managing mental health and suicides in the combat zone allows combat operators to
focus on their mission and safety of their peers. Clinical adjustments must be made along with
more services for operators in recovery and those who may become risks. Without adjusting
our current policies, members will remain at risk for mental illnesses, and suicides will continue
to occur.
7
FIGHTING MAD: MENTAL HEALTH IN THE COMBAT ZONE
References
Bryan, C., Kanzler, K., Durham, T., West, C., Greene, E. (2010) Challenges and considerations
for managing suicide risk in combat zones. Military Medicine, 175(10), 713-718. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-09-00248
Conway, T., Schmisel, E., Larson, G., Galameau, M. (2016) Treatment of mental or physical
doi:10.1002/jts.22091
Mental Health and Mental Disorders. (2016, November 3). Retrieved November 12, 2016, from
https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/mental-health-and-mental-
disorders
Prickett, T., Rothman, D., Brancu, Crawford. (2015) Mental health among military personnel
10.18043/ncm.76.5.299
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs398/en/
Wangelin, B., Tuerk, P. (2014). PTSD in active combat soldiers: To treat or not to treat?
World Health Organization: Sixty-Fifth World Health Assembly [Resolutions and Decisions