Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assignment Two
Rees Wilson
18563476
Table of Contents
Items:
Item 1: Pre Lesson ........................................................................................................................ 2
Information System Diagram .......................................................................................................... 5
Online Comparative Study............................................................................................................ 6
Item 3.1 - Post Lesson 1 ................................................................................................................ 9
Telephone Book Photo.................................................................................................................. 12
School Enrolment Part A ............................................................................................................... 13
Item 3.2 - Post Lesson 2 .............................................................................................................. 14
Data List ........................................................................................................................................ 17
ER Diagram .................................................................................................................................... 18
Item 4 Justification .................................................................................................................. 19
References ........................................................................................................................................ 22
Appendices:
Appendix A: Scope and Sequence ............................................................................................... 23
Appendix B: Concept Map .......................................................................................................... 24
Appendix C: Assessment Items ................................................................................................... 25
Appendix C.1: Assessment Handbook .............................................................................................. 25
Appendix C.2: Assessment Task ........................................................................................................ 26
Relational Database Project .......................................................................................................... 26
Marking Guidelines ....................................................................................................................... 27
Appendix D: Unit Outline ........................................................................................................... 28
Appendix E: Relational Table ...................................................................................................... 37
5 mins Students write down one thing Students: Reflect and share, hand
they learnt in this lesson. to teacher.
References:
Exit Ticket. (2016). The Teacher Toolkit. Retrieved 12 April 2017, from
http://www.theteachertoolkit.com/index.php/tool/exit-ticket
Lesson Resources:
Users: Environment
INFORMATION SYSTEM:
Purpose:
Information Processes:
20-25 mins Class debate (Planning) Teacher: Split groups, give topic S
out.
Class is split in to 2 groups, which
each need to make points for and Students: Come up with
against the topic: arguments for and against.
References:
None
Lesson Resources:
This is Part A of the Application to enrol in a NSW Government School Form as found at
http://www.schools.nsw.edu.au/gotoschool/enrolment/enrolment-form.php.
Discuss as a class.
Conclusion Point of Most Significance Teacher: Facilitate, collect answers S
5 mins
Students write down the piece of Students: Write answers
information which was most
important to them from this Resources: Paper, pens.
lesson.
References:
None
Lesson Resources:
- Data List
- ER Diagram
1. Andrew Fewchuk owns a blue Ford Laser with the number plate 111-2F4
2. Andrew Fewchuk also owns a green Mazda 3 with the number plate HF3-38S
3. Jacinda Cantlay owns a black Aston Martin MGB with the number plate 74H-d84
4. Tom Lingley owns an orange BMW M3 Sedan with the number plate 7H5-349
5. Tom Lingley also owns a pink Renault Scenic with the number plate 57G-84S
6. Tom Lingley also owns a red Bugatti Veyron with the number plate YR7-4U8
opportunities are presented to them. Following are the justifications for decisions made in the
designing of an online comparative study, as well as a lesson which prepares students for it and two
which follow and expand on the learning it provides. Decisions were made to ensure that the
incorporate collaborative learning. These, among other decisions, provide effective learning
Before the lessons and online study were created, the course content was organised in a Scope and
Sequence and Unit Outline. The Unit focused on provides students with their first experience of the
HSC IPT course, and as such it aims first to generate student interest in interacting with data by
examining a collection of case studies (Lee, Lee & Hwang, 2015). The lessons and online study were
taken from the content to be taught in the initial lessons of the HSC course. The SQL language is
introduced in the first unit, after student interest in the subject has been generated by the use of the
case studies, and this language is used heavily in the assessment and following units. SQL was
chosen as it is required that students know SQL commands for the HSC (BOSTES, 2009).
As todays world provides a school environment where students are technologically literate, and as
modern research suggests that the inclusion of technology in the classroom improves student
outcomes, an online comparative study was created to enhance student learning. There has long
been much discussion about the effectiveness of technology in the classroom, with some research
finding that technology can be implemented poorly and have little effect on student learning
(Cavanaugh, Dawson & Ritzhaupt, 2011), and other, more recent research finding that the use of
technology increases the achievement of students (Bai, Mo, Zhang, Boswell & Rozelle, 2016; Szeto &
Cheng, 2014). However, as most current research suggests that the use of technology improves
student test scores (Bai, et.al., 2016) and can have a positive effect on motivation and engagement
comparative study.
To ensure that the online comparative study has a positive effect on student learning, a series of
decisions were made to improve its educational potential. The first of these decisions was to use
real-world forms as the stimulus throughout the study. This draws on the benefit to engagement
gained when learning is related to experiences found outside of the classroom (Lee, et.al, 2015).
Furthermore, it was decided that Microsoft Excel should be used in the study as it is a software
which is widely used across a range of disciplines (Gordon, 2016) and therefore relevant outside of
this subject, as well as the need for student teachers to include technology other than simply the
Internet (Smarkola, 2008). Another step taken to ensure that the online study would be beneficial to
students was to focus on creating a clear, modern layout. As the effectiveness of e-learning is most
greatly impacted by students initial perception of the site (Sun, Tsai, Finger, Chen & Yeh, 2008), the
website where the comparative study takes place has minimal text on each page, and splits the
content into manageable and clear sections. Diagrams are also used to improve the layout of the
pages. Finally, an online discussion board was used in the study to benefit from the increased
potential that technology gives to encourage student collaboration (Bose, 2010; Lim & Chai, 2008)
The online comparative study has been carefully situated between lessons which prepare students
for it and enable them to further expand the learning gained through it. Firstly, the Pre-Lesson has
students begin to think about the different elements involved in Information Systems. This allows
their exploration of the data itself to be situated in the big picture of their learning. Furthermore, the
two lessons which follow the online study provide students with an opportunity to further expand
the understanding of the relationship between paper forms and computer-based tables. In the first
Post Lesson, students are introduced to a Flat-File Database Representation (BOSETES, 2009)
through the lens of one of the paper forms they examined in the online study. The second Post
Lesson then builds on the understanding of a Flat-File Database and introduces Relational
learning after.
Furthermore, the lessons which surround the online study were designed specifically to maximise
student learning through a range of elements. Firstly, each lesson makes the use of formative
assessment. This allows the teacher to gain an understanding of where students are at to be able to
effectively adjust the learning activities performed in the lesson (Keeley & Tobey, 2011).
Furthermore, each lesson clearly models and scaffolds the designing of tables and graphs, with class
instruction, followed by group and individual activities. This is done to improve student performance
(Frank, Simper & Kaupp, 2017). As with the online study, the content for the lessons attempts to
relate to students experiences outside of school, using photos of the White Pages (Lee, et.al., 2015).
Also, the use of a class debate in one of the lessons, as well as groupwork in each of the others
attempts to draw on the benefits gained in the use of Social Learning Theory (Jacobi, Toledo &
Grandisoli, 2016) in the classroom. It should also be noted that an Interactive Whiteboard was not
used in the lessons. This was done as research has found that Interactive Whiteboards have limited
impact on student learning when they are not implemented correctly, by using applications
specifically designed for the content (Armstrong, Barnes, Sutherland, Curran, Mills & Thomspon,
2005). This decision was made in this instance, but if suitable applications had existed, the use of an
Interactive Whiteboard would be another option for improving student engagement (Kennewell &
As such, the lessons presented here, as well as the online comparative study, all provide students
with the opportunity to not only develop an understanding of the required knowledge, but also
provide opportunities to develop an interest in the subject. This is done through the use of
collaboration, activities which are relevant to life outside of school and many other decisions made
Bai, Y., Mo, D., Zhang, L., Boswell, M., & Rozelle, S. (2016). The impact of integrating ICT with
teaching: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in rural schools in China. Computers &
Education, 96, 1-14.
Bose, S. (2010). Learning Collaboratively with Web 2.0 Technologies: Putting into Action Social
Constructivism. Online Submission.
Cavanaugh, C., Dawson, K., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2011). An evaluation of the conditions, processes, and
consequences of laptop computing in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing
Research, 45(3), 359-378.
Frank, B., Simper, N., & Kaupp, J. (2017). Formative feedback and scaffolding for developing complex
problem solving and modelling outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1-17.
Gordon, S. P. (2016). Functioning in Excel. Mathematics and Computer Education, 50(2), 86.
Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive
whiteboards. Learning, Media and technology, 32(3), 213-225.
Jacobi, P. R., Toledo, R. F., & Grandisoli, E. (2016). Education, sustainability and social
learning. Brazilian Journal of Science and Technology, 3(1), 3.
Keeley, P., & Tobey, C. R. (2011). Mathematics Formative Assessment, Volume 1: 75 Practical
Strategies for Linking Assessment, Instruction, and Learning. Corwin Press.
Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence
on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 227-241.
Lee, Y., Lee, J., & Hwang, Y. (2015). Relating motivation to information and communication
technology acceptance: Self-determination theory perspective. Computers In Human
Behavior, 51, 418-428.
Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of
computermediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807-
828.
Smarkola, C. (2008). Efficacy of a planned behavior model: Beliefs that contribute to computer usage
intentions of student teachers and experienced teachers. Computers in Human
Behavior, 24(3), 1196-1215.
Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An
empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers &
education, 50(4), 1183-1202.
Szeto, E., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2014). Exploring the usage of ICT and YouTube for teaching: A study of
pre-service teachers in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(1), 53-59.
Task Description
In this task you will create an SQL Database and write a series of SQL queries which retrieve
important information. There are two choices of database with different requirements each. For
each option, you must submit both a schematic diagram of your database, as well as the database
itself.
To get full marks, your database must store more than the bare minimum of information. Your
queries should be included in your database as functions, named something like querie_1 (x).
You must also write a collection of queries which return the following information. These queries
must not be hard coded to return the expected answer (eg, return 1) but must actually interact
with your database to return the answer:
1. The names of all stations in alphabetical order
2. The total number of trains that pass a station of your choice daily
3. A command to return the id of the next train which will arrive at station s after time t.
4. An alphabetical list of stations passed in a day by train t.
5. The total amount of passengers which can board a train t.
You will need to write a collection of queries which return the following information. Again, these
must not be hard coded.
1. A list of all books available to be loaned.
2. A list of all borrowers who are currently loaning more than 2 books, in alphabetical order.
3. The number of books written by author a.
4. A list of all books with String s making part of the title or authors name.
5. A list of genres, ordered by numbers of books.
Marking Guidelines
Guideline Mark
- Creates a schematic diagram which correctly caters to all requirements and
includes additional, relevant information. (H2.1)
- Implements a database which mirrors the design depicted in the schematic 14-15
diagram (H2.2)
- All queries work exactly as expected. (H6.1)
- Develops a schematic diagram which includes all required information. (H2.1)
- Implements a database which mirrors the schematic diagram almost completely
10-13
(H2.2)
- Writes queries which almost all work as expected (H6.1)
- Creates a schematic diagram which includes most of the required information
(H2.1)
8-10
- Database reflects elements of the schematic diagram. (H2.2)
- At least 3 queries work as expected (H6.1)
- Schematic diagram has some relevant information on it (H2.1)
- Database poorly follows schematic diagram (H2.2) 5-7
- At least 2 queries work as expected (H6.1)
- Schematic diagram contains incorrect information (H2.1)
- Database does not follow schematic diagram (H2.2) 0-5
- No queries exist or return the expected information (H6.1)
18 other information processes for database information design and create screens for interacting with
systems selected parts of a database and justify their
displaying appropriateness
constructing different views of a database for different design and generate reports from a database
purposes
19 issues related to information systems and databases identify and apply issues of ownership, accuracy,
acknowledgment of data sources data quality, security and privacy of information,
the Freedom of Information Act data matching
privacy principles discuss issues of access to and control of
information
20 issues related to information systems and databases identify and apply issues of ownership, accuracy,
quality of data data quality, security and privacy of information,
accuracy of data and the reliability of data sources data matching
access to data, ownership and control of data discuss issues of access to and control of
information
22 issues related to information systems and databases discuss issues of access to and control of
current and emerging trends in the organisation, information
processing, storage and retrieval of data, such as:
data warehousing and data mining
Online Analytical Processing (OLAP) and Online
Transaction Processing (OLTP)
23 storage and retrieval output sorted data from a database Students work on
tools for database storage and retrieval, including: generate reports from a database Assignment
extracting relevant information through searching and construct an SQL query to select data from a given
sorting a database database, matching given criteria
selecting data from a relational database using Query calculate the storage requirements for a given
24 by Example (QBE) and Structured Query Languages number of records (given a data dictionary for a Assignment Due at end
(SQL) commands, including: database) of Lesson
- select
- from
- where
- order by