Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DEOMAN UPADHAYAYA
SESSION 2015-2020
MARCH, 2017
HYPOTHESIS
The researcher comes with hypothesis that section 27 of Indian evidence act violates the right
which is given under article 14 of Indian constitution.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The researcher will go for doctrinal method of research. The researcher will depend on existing
materials like Bare act, Evidence law books, case laws, journals.
SOURCES OF DATA
There are two sources of data mainly, primary and secondary.
Primary Source- Bare act
Secondary Source- Evidence law book, Websites, Article
TENTATIVE CHAPTERIZATION
1. INTRODUCTION
2. Confession under section 24
3. Confession under section 25
4. Confession under section 26
5. Confession under section 27
6. CASE LAWS
7. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESSTIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS
(i) Advocate Lal Batuk The Law of Evidence Act (Central Law Agency, Allahabad 2016,
17th Edition)
(ii) Dr. Saxena Poonam Pradhan Property Law (Lexis Nexis 2011, 2nd edition )
WEBSITES
(i) https://indiankanoon.org/doc/481284/
(ii) http://www.shareyouressays.com/119196/whether-section-27-under-indian-evidence-
act-is-constitutional
BARE ACT
Universals Transfer of Propety Act, 1882 (2016)