THE THESIS: DEFINITION.

OBJECTIVES,
AND CRITERIA FOR ACCEPTABILITY

Definition and Objectives

The thesis is a major paper required of every student to earn the BS Computer Science,
Information Technology, Information Management degree. It is intended to give the student an
opportunity to demonstrate his ability to conduct independent research on a specific problem in
computer science or any field where a computer science model or solution may be employed.

By definition and Objectives, a thesis must have these elements:

1. It is a major paper concerning subject matters of interest to the student and is a

component of his major field of study.
2. It must be an action-oriented undertaking and not a purely theoretical paper. As such, the
thesis must be a product of field research rather than a purely library work.
3. It must be significant to society, or in line with the mission-vision of the University. This
means that the study would address present issues in the service of the University,
National or Church Issues.
4. It must be an original work. This means the thesis so chosen by the student should not
duplicate the content, form and conclusions of any previous study. Operationally, this
means. that thesis topics must have been checked by the student against the library.

Criteria for Acceptability

The thesis aims to validate the application of student learning into a competent and
professional work. To be acceptable, therefore, the thesis must show evidence of comprehensive
work, sound organization of material, clear thinking, and creativity.

1. Evidence of Comprehensive Work means that:

a. The thesis is related to and meets the purposes of the approved proposal.
b. Field work and research are sufficient to meet the data requirements.
c. Facts and computations are accurate.
d. Appropriate analytical tools and techniques of research and analysis are used.
e. Draft is well-typed and well-written as to correct grammar and textual coherence.
2. Evidence of Sound Organization of Material includes the following:
a. Findings are in the text and not buried in the exhibits.
b. There is a thorough coverage of subject matter.
c. Facts are distinguished from opinions.
d. Facts are documented.
e. Sources are reliable.
3. Clear Thinking means that:
a. The textual presentation is logical.
b. There is clearness of purpose, ideas, problems, alternatives and constraints.
c. The analyses and assumptions flow from facts and are reasonable.
d. Conclusions flow logically from analysis; recommendations from conclusions;
and action-decision-programs of action from recommendations.
e. The conditions under which the solutions are working must be identified.
4. Evidence of Creativity means that:
a. The thesis should indicate transfer of student learning from the classroom to a
professional piece of work.
b. Facts are interpreted, not merely repeated.
c. The work is useful, current, relevant, and meaningful to any.
d. The thesis highlights other related problems and explores further areas of
research.
e. In the orals, the student must demonstrate his mastery of subject matter as well
as articulate in his findings and conclusions.

Thesis Manual Page 1 of 23

 THE THESIS PROCESS: POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND FORMS

The thesis process takes the student through the following steps:
1. Selection of topic ideas
2. Selection and Assignment of Thesis Adviser
3. Design of the Thesis Proposal
4. Approval of Thesis Proposal by the Thesis Proposal Evaluation Panel
5. Implementation of Thesis Proposal and Writing of the Thesis
6. Thesis Adviser's Approval of Thesis and Written Recommendation for its Oral Defense.
7. Submission of-Thesis for Oral Defense (3 copies)
8. Completion of Pre-Oral Defense Clearance
9. Composition of Thesis Defense Panel and Schedule of Oral Defense
10. Thesis Oral Defense (and Re-orals, if required)
11. Submission of Final Draft of Thesis

Selection of Topic Ideas and Assignment of Thesis Adviser

The student initiates preliminary research on a selected number of subjects or area which
he believes will meet the elements of a good and manageable thesis. The student determines the
data requirements - the extent and sources of secondary information and the magnitude of
primary data that have to be generated.
The student submits the written draft of topic ideas/areas to his/her Adviser. This will
enable the professor involved to advise the student more meaningfully on the selection of an
appropriate topic. An adviser may also swap advisee with another professor who is comfortable
with the field of study.

Criteria for Selecting Thesis Adviser

1. Expertise in the specific problem area of the thesis.
2. Availability or has time to accommodate the student during the development and the final
writing of the thesis.
3. Can work harmoniously with the student.

Design of the Thesis Proposal

This manual should guide the student in the development of the design of the thesis
proposal and in the varying stages of the thesis process. It is recommended that the student
should consult different members of the faculty and outside practitioners and experts, aside from
the consultations with his thesis adviser.
The ICS Dept. requires the submission of a written copy of the thesis proposal draft/s, as
a basis for discussion and advise.

Approval of the Thesis Proposal By An Evaluation Panel

The thesis proposal approval process, includes the following:

1. Students are required to submit a preliminary draft of a thesis proposal to the Information
Computer Studies Dept. Preliminary discussions of the thesis proposal with the thesis
adviser are necessary to clarify specific details in the thesis proposal and get further
comments and suggestions which will improve the writing of the revised thesis proposal.
2. The Computer Division screens the thesis proposal according to the format given in the
following pages. Upon recommendation of the Computer Division, the student submits
one copy of the revised thesis proposal. It should be in 8-1/2" x 11" thesis paper
(available at the Computer Division), typewritten and double-spaced to-allow for insertion,
comments and notations.
3. In consultation with the student, the Computer Division will designate the three members
of the proposal evaluation panel. The thesis adviser is usually included as an additional
member of this panel.
4. The thesis proposal evaluation panel evaluates the thesis proposal for acceptability or
non-acceptability. It may make modifications in the scope, depth, direction and
methodology of the proposal; and determines the manageability of the thesis work within
the given time frame. (Note: To prove continuity, the members of the thesis proposal
evaluation panel will also constitute the membership of the thesis oral defense panel.)
The student is responsible for distributing the thesis proposal evaluation forms to the
three panel members. Likewise, he must get back all the completed forms and submit
these to the Computer Science Division.
5. If the thesis proposal is acceptable, the student can accelerate his thesis work. If it is not
acceptable, the students undertake the appropriate revisions to the thesis proposal.

Thesis Manual Page 2 of 23

Implementation of the Approved Thesis Proposal and Writing of the Thesis
The student reaches this stage only when the following conditions are met:
the thesis proposal is approved;
enrollment in Thesis Direction;
and a thesis adviser is assigned and consulted.
Experience has shown that the failure to meet these conditions generally results in drastic
revisions, re-writing, and in some cases, rejection. As a matter of-policy, thesis drafts submitted
without observing the cited process and conditions will be rejected and returned to the student.
To facilitate the writing of the thesis, it is expected that the student will be required by his
thesis adviser to:

1. Submit a substantially detailed outline, a time-table for each activity in the process, and a
schedule of consultations between student and adviser.
2. Submit the thesis drafts piecemeal, chapter by chapter.

The thesis is a student's creation; an evidence of his capacity for independent study.
Therefore, he should not expect his thesis adviser to co-write or collaborate on his study. The
thesis adviser will act as a guide but not his crutch. Creativity, motivation, and initiative must
come from the student.
A thesis is both content and style. Every thesis (or any report for that matter) has three
basic elements, namely:

1. The concept of the thesis- this is broken down further into the concepts embodied in
the report: as well as the breadth and depth of information and the analysis that ties
in this information into a coherent whole.
2. The clarity of the thesis which allows the reader to understand what is being said
easily and correctly.
3. The format and style of presentation. The student is expected to be guided by this
manual even during the writing of the draft. This simple precaution will avoid undue
delay in the approval of his thesis. In the matter of format, the student is required to
follow the “Format of the ICS Dept. Thesis” given in the following pages.

Submission of Thesis Oral Defense

Before submitting the clean thesis draft, the student must secure the thesis adviser's
approval of the thesis and written recommendation for oral defense. This is accomplished by the
signature of the Thesis Adviser on the Endorsement Sheet.
The student is required to submit 3 copies of the thesis to the ICS Dept. On each of the 3
copies is attached the Endorsement Sheet. The copies of the thesis draft are distributed to the
three panel members.

Composition of the Thesis-Defense Panel

There are three members of the panel, one of whom is the thesis adviser. The two regular
members are designated by the ICS Dept. and normally, will be constituted by the same
members who composed the thesis proposal evaluation panel.

Schedule of Oral Defense,

The oral defense is usually scheduled two weeks after the submission of the clean draft of the
thesis. The exact date is confirmed only after the student has checked the availability of all his
panel members and thesis adviser.

Refusal to Grant Oral Examination

Any Member of the thesis defense panel can refuse to grant an oral examination for any thesis
which does not meet the given standard, e.g. sloppy, badly 'written, unedited, disorganized,
lacking in substance, or a duplication of a previous thesis. The panel member must call the
attention of the thesis defense chairman and cite the reason why he refuses to grant oral
examination. If the chairman concurs, the oral defense is deferred and the student has to re-work
his thesis before requesting for an oral examination. If the chairman does not agree with the
panel members and thinks the student is ready for oral defense, the oral examination is carried
on as scheduled.
On the other hand, in cases where it is the chairman himself who refuses to grant the oral
examination based on the grounds cited above, he can call off the oral defense. On the thesis
defense chairman rests the veto power. The ICS Dept. then must immediately notify the student
and the other panel members of the decision.
The refusal to grant an oral examination must be done two working days prior to the scheduled
date of defense, at the latest.

Thesis Manual Page 3 of 23

Thesis Oral Defense and Voting Procedures
A student is allowed a maximum of three orals: the first oral defense and two re-orals. For
the student who received a passing grade, the thesis adviser and defense panel should sign
copies of the Thesis Approval Sheet
Only the three regular members of the panel have the authority to decide on the passing
or failing of the thesis oral defense, and to prescribe revisions and re-orals.
As soon the oral examination is completed, the student, observers and other guests are
requested to leave the room so that the deliberation and voting can take place. The deliberation
should cover two main areas: the written thesis and the oral defense itself. Once the deliberation
is finished, the chairman gives the two voting members each a copy of the Thesis Oral Evaluation
Sheet. On this form are written their respective votes and specific comments for inclusion in the
revision of the thesis. This is done individually without consulting each other. All the completed
forms are then compiled by the chairman and read aloud to the defense panel.
If not all voting members agree on the grade (Pass/Fail) to be given the student, the
majority rule is applied (two out of three). The majority vote and specific comments are then
written on the blank copy of Evaluation sheet by the chairman, which becomes the final grade
sheet. On this grade sheet, the signatures of the following must be accomplished: Thesis
adviser and the two regular defense panel members.

After completing this, the chairman calls the student back to the room and announces the
results of the Oral examination and other details required of him. The student is given a copy of
the final grade sheet and the specific comments after the defense.

Submission of the Final Draft of Thesis and Its Reproduction

After passing the oral defense, the student should work on the thesis final draft,
incorporating the revisions and rewriting required, and recommended by the thesis defense
panel. The student should consult with the thesis adviser. When the thesis adviser is satisfied that
the revisions have been incorporated and that the student has met the thesis defense panel’s
requirements/recommendation, the thesis adviser certifies his approval by signing of the Thesis
Adviser's Certification of Student's Completion of Thesis Revisions/Changes. The revised draft
should be completed and submitted as soon as possible; and normally, should not exceed 7 days
after the oral defense. No student will be permitted to participate in the graduation ceremonies
unless the revised draft has been approved by the thesis adviser and submitted to the Computer
Division.

Project Documentation
For thesis work that makes use of a tool, project, or implementation of a information
system, a separate project documentation will be submitted. Instead of placing the investigation,
design and implementation documentation in the Appendix of the Thesis, the group will submit a
separate document conforming to SAD documentation standards. (Final form will still be decided
upon by the ICS Dept)

Thesis Manual Page 4 of 23

GENERAL MATTERS

Role of the Thesis Adviser

The role of the thesis adviser is to give advise, to suggest, to counsel, and to encourage
and monitor the student. The thesis is the candidate's creation, not the adviser's.
On the other hand, the selection of a thesis adviser is primarily, based on his knowledge
of the problem area. He is chosen because he can positively guide the candidate in the
preparation and writing of the thesis. The candidate, though, must take the initiative in arranging
for conferences with him.
The thesis is both matter and style. The adviser does not only evaluate the contents but
must see to it that the paper conforms to the form and style of a thesis.
The adviser is responsible for reading the final copy of the accepted thesis taking into
consideration its content, format, style, and grammar. The adviser, as well as any member of the
thesis defense panel, can refuse to accept a study which contains excessive graphical and
grammatical errors or inaccurate thesis form and style.

Circulation of the Thesis

The thesis is an academic requirement. It has been and can be reproduced by a course
professor as a teaching device for the benefit of the future classes at UST - College of Science.
The thesis is a public document. Copies of each thesis are available for reading in the
ICS Library.
As the thesis is a public document, it cannot be kept confidential-For very important and
exceptional reasons, however, the thesis may be kept confidential for a period of one year or
more depending on the student's reasons. A student wishing confidentially for his thesis will first
have to make a written request to, and get the approval of the ICS Head.

Form Letter for Securing Information or Seeking Interviews from External

Sources

A standard form letter has been prepared to assist students in securing information or
seeking interviews from sources external to the UST College of Science.

As the letter indicates, 4 items must be supplied to fill it in:

1. The name and title of person addressed, and the company address
2. The title of the thesis
3. The specific information required and/or the name/s of the persons/s to be interviewed
and
4. the signatory of the letter(Normally, the thesis adviser and the ICS Dept head)

Please note that the letter leaves the decision of permitting access entirely up to the
person addressed.

Thesis Manual Page 5 of 23

 Some Final Notes of Advice

The following rather categorical statements are based on ICS Dept experience with the
thesis. The words of warning given below have made each year, and heeded in varying
degrees. The advice is free and seems obvious but failure to heed it has been detrimental
to the student.

1. Begin immediately. Do not waste time.

2. Spend time on selecting a topic. Once committed, do not allow yourself to be

distracted by other seemingly more promising subjects. Changing in midstream
can be disastrous.

3. Allow for delays. These delays may waste some valuable time but you are not in
complete control of the situation. Interviews will be cancelled, field trips will
have negative results, data will not arrive on time, off-campus panel member will
be out of the country, etc.

4. Always have an outline/a structure/a conception or analytical framework in mind

when researching to avoid unnecessary data, and when writing, to prevent
inclusion of irrelevant information.

5. Keep the panel in mind when writing. The panel members will have a different
viewpoint and they cannot read your mind. What may be obvious and clear to you
may have to be explained to them. Do not assume you will pass without revision
on the first oral.

6. Keep your perspective. The thesis is part of a whole curriculum. You must
maintain equilibrium between the thesis and your other courses.

7. Do not depend on others. The thesis is exclusively your work. Even your adviser
can help only when you have provided firm data' and completed a thorough
analysis. His real help comes after the submission of the first draft.

8. Have your oral examination as soon as possible. Get the entire thesis over with as
quickly as possible.

9. Assume that your work will be far better than anyone else's thesis this year and
assume that the faculty and the panel will assume this. Do not judge your thesis in
relation to other theses, particularly tho6e of the preceding years

10. Make as much use of your adviser as he will allow you to. That way, you will
greatly increase your chances of sailing smoothly through your orals. Most of
those who failed in their thesis never consulted their advisers.

Thesis Manual Page 6 of 23

 THESIS ORAL DEFENSE PROCEDURE

Areas of Considerations
The student may be allowed the first 20 to 30 minutes for a brief and succinct presentation of his
thesis covering the main points and highlights of the following:

1. Problems and Objectives

2. Significance
3. Research Design and Methodology
4. Main findings
5. Conclusions
6. Recommendations

It should be emphasized that the presentation should be brief and concise and should not exceed
30 minutes. However, since it is assumed that the panel has read the whole texts, the panel may
choose to forego the presentation and immediately proceed with the interrogation. This also
implies that a defense can only take place if the panel has received the documents at least 14
days before the scheduled defense.

Time Period of the Defense

As much as possible, the defense shall be limited to one half to two hours. The interrogation by
the panel should normally not exceed one hour Questions should be addressed first to main
issues/areas of the thesis and later on the minor points. Misprints, style and other corrections
may be indicated in the copy, which will be given back to the student afterwards.

Format of the Defense

The Chairman of the thesis panel presides over the defense. Given the above, other aspects of
the format to be followed are left to the discretion of the Chairman.

Observers
Unless specifically prohibited (e-g., the thesis subject matter is classified or highly confidential)
students and other interested parties are allowed to observe the oral defense. Observers should
maintain proper decorum and may be allowed to ask questions at the discretion of the Chairman

Deliberation
The deliberation should cover two main areas:

1. the written thesis

2. the oral defense itself

These two areas should be evaluated based on the Criteria for Evaluation, of Thesis Proposals
and of Submitted Theses and on the parameters given below:

• Is it acceptable by UST-CS standards?.Why or why not?

• Are there major revisions to make the thesis acceptable?
• Are there minor revisions to make it a better thesis?
• Any other observations?

The adviser acts as the advocate of the thesis defendant. He should carefully take note of the
recommendations, revisions, changes, and comments of the thesis panel and have them signed
at the end of the defense. In many instances, the review of thesis revisions and changes are
charged by the panel to the sole responsibility of the thesis adviser.

The student’s submission of the revised thesis should be attached with the Thesis Adviser's
Certification of Student's Completion of Thesis Revisions/Changes Required by Thesis Oral
Defense Panel

Thesis Manual Page 7 of 23

 OUTLINE OF THE THESIS PROPOSAL
A. INTRODUCTION
1. Background of the Study
2. Statement of the Problem
3. Objectives of the Study
4. Significance of the Study
5. Scope and Delimitations of the Study
B. RESUME OF RELATED LITERATURE
C. RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODOLOGY
1. Definition of Terms, Hypotheses, and Basic Assumptions
2. Research Design And Methodology
a) Specification of Research Design
b) Sources of Data
c) Description of Research Method/s or Technique/s
Used
3. Detailed Outline of the Study
4. Time Table (Gantt Chart)

OUTLINE OF THE THESIS

I. THE PRELIMINARIES
a. Title Page
b. Approval Sheet
c. Table of Contents
d. List of Figures, Illustrations, etc- (if any)
II. THE TEXT OF THE THESIS
a. Introduction
1. Background of the Study
2. Statement of the Problem
3. Objectives of the Study
4. Significance of the Study
5. Scope and Delimitations of the Study
b. Resume of Related Literature
c. Research Design and Methodology
1. Definition of Terms, Hypotheses, and Basic Assumptions
2. Research Design and Methodology
i. Specification of Research Design
ii. Sources of Data
iii. Description of Research Method/s or Technique/s Used
d. Presentation and Interpretation of Data - This is the meat of the thesis,
consisting of well defined chapters reporting the results of the student's
research
e. Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations
1. Summary
2. Conclusions
3. Recommendations
4. Problems for Further Study
III. THE REFERENCE MATTER
a. Appendix
b. Bibliography

Thesis Manual Page 8 of 23

 GUIDE NOTES FOR THESIS WRITERS

In comparing the formats of the thesis proposal and the thesis, the student will note that the
introductory chapter of the thesis contains the essential parts that make up the thesis proposal. In
the thesis proposal, however, the student will have to add a detailed outline of his study and a
timetable from the time of his-fieldwork to the completion of the final draft.

The Title
The title should express very concisely and clearly the topic or subject for investigation, that is,
the what, where, who, why, and how of the proposed area of research. The maximum length may
be from 5 to 20 words and the title can also be formulated as a question-

Preface or Foreword and/or Acknowledgment

The student may have given extra extraordinary assistance of non-routine character by several
persons and an acknowledgment is a gesture of gratitude. However, the help rendered by
the thesis adviser, thesis committee, or administrative officers of the school is part of their work
and does not require written acknowledgement. Dedications are ordinarily in questionable taste
and are inappropriate for thesis work.

Statement of the Problem

The student should explore or develop a research problem in a field that relates to his interests
and the undertaking will no doubt give him valuable knowledge and experience in his area of
specialization. However, the choice of topic must be characterized by originality, uniqueness,
social relevance, and of a size proportional to the size of the team. The topic must be delimited
enough to permit an exhaustive treatment and significant enough to merit investigation.
The main problem in the study is expanded reiteration of the thesis title itself. Thus there is a
need to identify the main problem in precise terms and to break it down into sub-problems. Sub-
problems, when tested, investigated or synthesized, provide answers to the main problem.
In presenting the exact dimension of the problem, the student should discuss not only the facts
and explanations that contribute to the problem but also the background of the study, the theories
upon which it is based, and the assumptions underlying the statement of the problem.
One criterion that can be added is the preference that the thesis be development-oriented, that is,
it should help bring about a solution even in a small measure, to a problem related to national
goals and directly affecting the national interest.

Objectives of the Study

The objectives state exactly what type of information the research is to develop, and how this
information will assist the reader of the thesis. Objectives should be succintly presented and the
student may, if possible, dovetail the sub-problems into the objectives of the study. The objective
may also be stated in the form of questions.

Significance and Importance of the Study

First, You must establish a logical need for the study, that it does not duplicate any previous
investigation; or if it does, you must establish that roast studies are inadequate. Significance can
also be emphasized by providing answers to identified gaps in knowledge or controversial in the
area, or by illustrating the importance of the study in terms of content and methodology. Give a
straightforward statement of the value of the investigation to practitioners and professionals in the
field of the study, or to other particular persons or entities, which could benefit from the study.

Score and Delimitations of the Study

The scope composes the total area of the study by establishing the parameters and indicating the
cut-offs of the project. The delimitation, however, narrows down the scope into a reasonable area
of study, which is manageable but wide enough to permit careful treatment. In identifying the
nature of the study, it is best to consider the area and time coverage, area of sampling, and the
scope of treatment. These will provide the information concerning the who, what, when, where,
and how of the study.
The limitation of the study should also include a frank admission of any weakness or shortcoming,
be this in the lack of representativeness of the sampling or the cost and time constraints in the
investigation.

Resume of Related Research and Professional Literature

A thorough review of the literature is a requirement. This means that previous studies, articles in
scholarly journals, books and the like should riot be merely indicated in the footnotes' but the
concepts and findings relevant to the present study as found in these materials should be briefly

Thesis Manual Page 9 of 23

discussed and critically abstracted to provide' the foundation for the proposed research- The
background of earlier studies relating to the problem at hand should be developed to show that
the existing evidence does not solve the problem adequately; hence, the need to provide new
insights and more relevant information, methods, and solutions. The review of related literature
not only must include both foreign and local materials and authors but also must be directed to
the most recent, both in content and method.

Definition of Terms, Assumptions, and Hypotheses

Important words, specialized terms or technical expressions should be given their authoritative or
operational definition in the context of the study.
The use of the hypothesis varies with the type of research undertaken. As Goode and Scates
define it, a hypothesis is a shrewd guess or inference that is formulated and previously adopted to
explain observed facts or conditions to guide in further 'investigation.
From the hypothesis, the student must deduce its consequences, develop tests to determine
through experiment or observation whether these consequences occur, and carry out these tests
to confirm or reject that hypothesis.
Research hypotheses not subject to experimental testing are usually stated in positive,
declarative sentences- Hypotheses subject to experimental studies and statistical tests are stated
in the negative and hence are called null hypotheses. The testing of null hypothesis will determine
whether the hypothesis is accepted or rejected-
A working hypothesis must come from clearly identified assumptions. Assumptions -- accepted as
general truths or statements of facts are, in substance, the extension of previous findings' and.
studies to the new situation.

Research Design and Methodology

The research design should be identified in terms of the research method used, the-respondents,
the sources of data, and the instruments used in gathering the data. In other words, the design
should be explained in such a specific way that anyone wishing to replicate, the study can be
guided by the methodology used in the study.
The methodology should show the relationship of each sub-problem to the hypothesis, the kind of
data and their sources (including the criteria for the selection of secondary sources if they are to
be used), and the conceptual analytical framework or methods of organizing, evaluating and
interpreting the data.
The student should adopt a presentation suited to the purpose of the study i.e., if the study is a
sample survey, elaborate on the sampling section.

Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations

This concluding chapter of the thesis must present an overview of the entire study, which covers
a brief statement of the problem and purpose of the report, including the formulation of
hypotheses. It must include a presentation of data as the testing ground of the problem and
hypotheses, and the main findings, conclusions and recommendations' should be the logical
outflow of the sub-problems cited in the first chapter.
In other words, the summary of findings should be stated in the order the sub-problems were
presented, and care should be taken that the materials presented as part of the findings are all
relevant to the study and they provide the answers to each of the sub-problems.
Findings are often listed by number with each major finding summarized in one or two sentences.
That is, each hypothesis may be listed and followed immediately by a very brief summary of the
findings related to the hypothesis.

The conclusions must be drawn directly from the findings and should recapitulate the answers to
the questions of the* investigation. Conclusions, must be objective, logical, valid and precise. The
recommendations should, if- possible, be based also on the findings and conclusions.
It is often desirable as part of this chapter to add a paragraph or section on implications, so, that
the investigator can present interpretations, speculations, and ideas that would not be out of
place in the conclusions. The student may also discuss possible applications of the findings to
pertinent systems or situations and recommend for further study other side problems uncovered
during the course of the thesis research.

Thesis Manual Page 10 of 23

 Appendix A: Thesis Proposal Review and Evaluation

ICS Dept., College of Science

UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

Thesis Proposal Title :

Date Submitted :

Proponents :
1. Name1
2. Name2
3. Name3

REVIEW AND EVALUATION PANEL

5. _______________________________________________
____________
6. _______________________________________________
____________
7. _______________________________________________
____________

Evaluation Comments, & Recommendation

Thesis Manual Page 11 of 23

 Signature : ______________________
Thesis Adviser
Date: ______________________

Thesis Manual Page 12 of 23

 Appendix B: ORAL EXAMS ENDORSEMENT SHEET

ICS Dept., College of Science

UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

Thesis Title :

Proponents :
1. Name1
2. Name2
3. Name3

In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in

_________________________________________________________________

the thesis mentioned above, has been adequately prepared and submitted by the
proponents and is hereby endorsed by the undersigned for oral examinations.

Signature : ______________________
Thesis Adviser
Date: ______________________

Thesis Manual Page 13 of 23

 Appendix C: ORAL EXAMS APPROVAL SHEET

ICS Dept., College of Science

UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

Thesis Title :

Proponents :
1. Name1
2. Name2
3. Name3

In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in

_________________________________________________________________
the thesis mentioned above, has been adequately prepared and submitted by the
proponents and is hereby endorsed by the undersigned for oral examinations.

______________________
Thesis Adviser

Defended in an oral examination before a duly constituted tribunal with a

grade of

__________________________________________
Panel Chairman

___________________________________ __________________________________
Member Member

Accepted in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degreee of Bachelor of Science

in ________________________________________________

_____________________________
_

Thesis Manual Page 14 of 23

 Prof. Perla Cosme
Dept. Head,
Information Computer Studies Dept.
College of Science, UST

Thesis Manual Page 15 of 23

 Appendix D: Memorandum to Thesis Oral Defense Panel

ICS Dept., College of Science

UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

Date:

TO: __________________
__________________
__________________

This is a reminder of the oral defense of the thesis

Thesis Title :

by the Proponents :
1. Name1
2. Name2
3. Name3

On DATE: ________________ TIME : __________________

Attached is a copy of :

[ ] The thesis (Please bring this with you during the oral defense)
[ ] Criteria for Evaluation of Submitted Thesis
[ ] Excerpts for Thesis Oral Defense Panel Members
[ ] Excerpts for Thesis Adviser

Should there be other information you may need, please do not hesitate to get in touch
with us.

Sincerely yours,

Thesis Coordinator

Thesis Manual Page 16 of 23

 Appendix E: Form Letter

ICS Dept., College of Science

UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS
Date:

__________________
__________________
__________________

Dear ___________,

This letter will introduce (students’ name), senior students of the College
of Science, UST. They are at present completing a research report entitled
____________________________________________________________ for
their Bachelor’s thesis as part of the requirements of their BS Degree.

(Students’ name) are requesting (purpose) all information supplied will be

incorporated into the student’s report for the oral defense and for the ICS dept
library files.

Any assistance your office can render would be appreciated.

Very Truly yours,

Adviser’s Signature

Thesis Manual Page 17 of 23

 Appendix E: THESIS Oral Defense Evaluation Sheet

ICS Dept., College of Science

UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS

Proponents : ____________________ Signature :_________________

____________________ _________________
____________________ _________________

Thesis Title :
Thesis Adviser : Signature:
Oral Defense Date: Time:
Thesis Oral Defense Panel:

Chairman Signature:
Panel 1. Signature:
Panel 2. Signature:

Panel’s Evaluation of Thesis Oral Defense

A. GRADE

1. _______ Pass ______ Conditional Pass _____ Fail

2. _______ No re-oral ______ Possible re-Oral _____ re-Oral

B. Required revisions and Changes

1. ______ No Revisions ______ Minor Revision ______ Major Revision

2. Revisions/Changes Submission Date (Specific) _________________
3. Revisions/Changes to be Reviewed by

______________ Thesis Oral Defense Panel and Thesis Adviser

______________ Thesis Adviser Only

C. Specific Comments on Revisions, Changes and Recommendations

Thesis Manual Page 18 of 23

Appendix I: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF THESIS PROPOSALS AND OF
SUBMITTED THESES

ICS Dept., College of Science

UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS
The Problem
1. The subject or problem is not significant, or of sufficient importance.
2. The subject or problem is not sufficiently delineated.
3. The proposed research is- unlikely to produce any new or useful information.
4. The problem is not specific.
5. The problem is not clearly stated.
6. The proposed research is based on a hypothesis that rests on insufficient evidence, is
doubtful, or is unsound.
7. The problem is more complex than the investigator appears to realize.
8. The problem has only local significance.
9. The problem is premature and warrants, at Most, only a pilot study.
10. The description of the nature of the research and of its significance leaves the proposal
nebulous and diffuse and without clear research aim.
11. The research as proposed is overly involved, with too many elements under
simultaneous investigation.

The Approach
1. The proposed tests, or methods, or scientific procedures are unsuited to the stated
objective.
2. The description of the approach is too nebulous, diffuse, and lacking in clarity to permit
adequate evaluation.
3. The over-all design of the study has not been carefully thought out.
4. The statistical aspects of the approach have not been given sufficient considerations.
5. The approach lacks scientific imagination.
6. Controls are either inadequately conceived or inadequately described.

The Data
1. The material the investigator proposes to use is not relevant to the objectives of the study
or is difficult to obtain.
2. The number of cases or observations is to few or unsuitable.
3. The data or documents are inadequate, invalid, unreliable, or inappropriate.
4. The data is not analyzed carefully nor presented clearly.

Findings
1. The findings and conclusions do not have sufficient base in the data.
2. The findings and conclusions are not justified by the analysis of the data.

The Recommendations
1. The recommendations do not -follow logically from the thesis writer's findings and
conclusions.
2. The thesis writers do not have adequate experience or training, or both, for this research.
3. The thesis writers appear to be unfamiliar with the recent pertinent literature or methods,
or both.

Source: AGSB Manual

Thesis Manual Page 19 of 23

 THESIS Recommended Schedule
June 16 General Orientation.
Schedule of Thesis and deadlines
Methods of Research
Guidelines for topics
June 23 Presentation of Model Thesis
Methods of Research (continued)
June 30 Discuss expectations for Chapters 1 to 3,
writing format and Bibliographic notes.
July 7 • Advisers approve/reject topic and
communicates results to ICS Dept.
• Advisers call in the groups for
questioning if necessary
July 14 Discuss Writing Guidelines for Chapter 3
(Review of Related Literature)
July 21& 28 Checking of the development of Chapters 1 to
3.
Aug 4 Check with Red ink 1st Draft and Date stamp
received. Record comments and
recommendations and date returned.
All Drafts should be returned before 8/15
Aug 11 *** PRELIMS WEEK ***
Aug 18 Checking Thesis Proposal for Form, Style and
Substance.
Check for the Group’s Thesis Project Plan
(schedule, assignments of each member,
weekly monitoring scheme to be used)
Aug 25 Thesis Proposal Defense
Sept 1 Redefense if necessary
Sept 8-22 Advisers will check weekly accomplishment
reports of the teams and signs them.
Sept 29 Last day for Changes and adjustment in
Thesis Proposal.
Nov 3 - 10 Checking of System Design and
Documentation.
Document feedback and comments (docs
must be presented by team during final
defense)
Advisers makes initial check before being
presented to the Panel.
Nov - Dec Advisers check Weekly Accomplishment
against thesis project plan
Dec 15 Deadline for Submission of Complete
Thesis Document and System or Project
Documentation.
January 10 Deadline for Running Program and Project.
Submit to the Panel for personal Review
and scrutiny including a DEMO Script.
Thesis Manual
Submit Groupings
Review Topic with adviser
Review Abstract & finalize
proposal.
Submit Topic Proposals with
abstract and List of
References. (3 topics in one
field of study)
Narrow and deepen the
research and collection of
materials
Writing of the initial chapters
and use of prototyping for
review.
Submit 1st Draft of Thesis
Proposal (first 3 chapters) to
Adviser
Submission of Thesis
Proposal (Chap1-3), Final
Form to Adviser and Panel
plus schedule.
** PRELIM GRADE **
Presentation of Proposal
Continue Research
Continue Research and build
Prototype testing Key
elements of the Thesis and
verify its feasibility.
Document proposed changes,
rationale and supporting
evidence.
Presentation of
System/Program
(Beta Version) – All
components must be complete
and can be demonstrated.
Continue work of the thesis
paper and project
No changes allowed in code,
thesis & project documentation
till after defense. Teams work
Page 20 of 23
 Scheduling of Defense.
Jan 19-30 Schedule of Thesis Presentation & Defense.
Comments are documented.
Feb 2-13
Advisers should check the final form and
guarantee that all comments and
suggestions were made. Prepare a
position paper for suggestions,
comments that cannot be done.
Groups for Redefense submit documents and
project for evaluation.
Feb 16-20 Redefense. (Grade is only Pass or Fail)
Feb 25 DEADLINE FOR ALL DOCUMENTS
(SIGNED)
Thesis, Project, User’s Manual.
on the User’s Manual.
Make revisions after the
defense.
Advisers sign the Revised
thesis. Submit to Panel
members for signing.
Submit to Thesis Coordinator
for clearance.
(Late documents can only be
submitted after Feb 20. Grade
will be reduced to 3.)

All documents and proceedings of submission and revision must be filed

and recorded by the Team. This will be regularly checked by the
Adviser and should be present during the defense with the Panel

Standard Department Documents:

1. Template for Approval Sheet.
2. Format for every Chapter.
3. Format of Project Documentation.
4. Thesis Document Review. – Comments written on actual Document. A
comment summary page must be placed in front.
5. Project Document Review Sheet. – Review on the Documentation and
the actual Program or project.
6. Set of Model Thesis that can be used as REFERENCE by the 4th
years.

Thesis Manual Page 21 of 23

 THESIS DOCUMENT COMMENTS SUMMARY

Title Date
Group Adviser
Reviewer
(signed)

CHAPTER Pages with List of comments (brief)

comments
Cover Pages

Chap 1

Chap 2

Chap 3

Chap 4

Chap 5

Bibliography

Appendix

Tables

Figures

Thesis Manual Page 22 of 23

 PROJECT DOCUMENT Review Sheet
Title Date
Group Adviser
Reviewer
(signed)

CHAPTER Pages with List of comments (brief)

comments
Company/
Project
Introduction
Requirements
Analysis

Recommended
Software &
Development
Platform
(justification)
System Design
(DFD, Module
and Database)
Screen & User
Interface
Designs

External
(non-human)
Interface
Designs

Testing
Methodologies
Test Sheets

Maintenance
Requirements

User Training
Requirements

References

Thesis Manual Page 23 of 23