Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The translation was dated August 1928. The source document, Windmhlen in Lichte neuerer
Forschung, was published in Vol XV, No. 46 of Die Naturwissenschaften in November 1927.
Anyone working in wind energy knows A. Betz--or should. It was this and his previous treatises
on the subject where he concluded that the maximum energy a conventional wind turbine could
capture was 16/27 or 59.3% of the energy in the wind. He is the Betz of the Betz Limit.
Its just as well that I came across the English translation. The original German document is still
behind a $40 paywall at Springer Verlag after nearly 90 years!
http://www.wind-works.org/cms/index.php?id=81&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=4757&cHash=4d029b7594485d4ad32d885690a4febe 1/4
28/10/2017 WIND-WORKS: Betz: Everything You Need to Know about Wind Turbines Was Written in 1927
In my previous article I wrote that everything you need to know about wind energy was written in
1957 based on the work of French wind energy pioneer Louis Vadot. In the research for my new
book, Wind Energy for the Rest of Us, I concluded that our technical understanding of wind energy
and wind turbines was well known by the mid-1920s in part based on the work of Betz and Ludwig
Prandtl, his boss at Gttingen. However, I hedged my bets, noting that wind technology was
certainly well known by the mid-1950s.
After reading passages in Betzs legendary discourse it is clear now that we knew what we needed
to know about wind turbines and wind energy by 1927 in German and by 1928 in the English-
speaking world. Below are some topics from his paper that throw light on why modern wind
turbines look the way they do and why they are designed the way the are.
http://www.wind-works.org/cms/index.php?id=81&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=4757&cHash=4d029b7594485d4ad32d885690a4febe 2/4
28/10/2017 WIND-WORKS: Betz: Everything You Need to Know about Wind Turbines Was Written in 1927
So if you see a claim that an Internet wonder operates at wind speeds of say 2 mph youll know
that theyve never read Betz and, worse, probably have never heard of him.
Anyone can design a wind turbine to spin in low winds, but Who cares?
Lift Devices
However, with his warning that the efficiency of a drag device might be too low, Betz sets up his
second example that of a wind turbine where the blade moves transverse or perpendicular to the
wind, that is, a conventional wind turbine spinning about an horizontal axis. He then introduces a
number of concepts that ultimately lead to his calculation of the maximum efficiency of an
unducted rotor.
Keep in mind that Betz was writing at a time when there were great advances in the science of
what we now call aerodynamics, following the Great War. Importantly, he describes the lift and
drag forces acting on a blade as it moves across the wind and how these change relative to the
speed of the blade through the air. The latter, the ratio of the speed of the blade through the air
relative to the speed of the wind across the ground, is known as the tip-speed ratio.
Betz explains that the power available from a rotor blade with a tip-speed ratio of, say, three, is
six times greater than a flat plate of a drag device moving with the speed of the wind, that is,
with a tip-speed ratio of unity. He then notes, This great difference would justify the
unconditional choice of the second arrangement, namely, the utilization of the wing lift instead of
the drag, even though the construction of the wing should be somewhat more expensive than
that of a simple resisting body.
This is the reason wind turbines use wings or airfoils rather than flat plates, cups, buckets, or
similar wind catchers. Wind turbine blades literally fly through the air. Thats how they work and
why they are so much more efficient than drag devices.
Solidity
Betz then examines the design of the windmill or rotor itself. He explains as a rotor blade moves
through the air it affects the air around it. This then has an effect on any blades following it
through the air. This is true, he says in a footnote, even if the rotor only has one blade. Even in
the 1920s, engineers, such as Betz, knew that you only needed one blade to make a wind turbine
function.
The air must move over the blade then get out of the way of the air following it, Betz explains. If
there are many blades close together there is resistance to the air moving through the rotor disc.
He says, The more the air is retarded the less air flows through the windmill. A portion of the air
flows around the obstruction without giving up its energy.
In short, this explains why modern wind turbines use two or three slender blades rather than
filling the rotor disc with many thick blades. This isnt intuitive. Consequently, many untutored
inventors try to cram the rotor disc with as many blades as physically possible as this seems to
make sense intuitively.
Betz calls the solidity of the rotor, that is, how much area of the rotor disc is covered by the
blades, the vane density. Modern, high-speed wind turbines have low solidityor Betzs vane
densityrelative to a high-solidity, slow-speed wind turbine such as a farm windmill used for
pumping water.
According to Betz, Vane density is inversely proportional to the vane velocity. The choice, within
certain limits, of the lift coefficient renders it possible to adapt the vane width to the desired
structural conditions. With a constant lift coefficient, the vane width, for example, would have to
be greater toward the hub.
As Betz says, The faster a windmill is designed to rotate, the smaller must be its vane density.
As the tip of the blade moves faster through the air than that portion of the blade near the hub, it
must be more slender so the rotor has less vane density or solidity at the tip than near the hub.
This explains why todays wind turbine blades taper from the hub to the tip.
Thus, says Betz, its best to design a wind turbine with a high rotational speed for two reasons.
In the first place, a smaller vane area is required and the windmill is correspondingly simpler.
The second reason is that a high-speed turbine requires a smaller gearbox to step up the shaft
speed to that required by a generator relative to that of a low-speed turbine.
Betz on Testing
http://www.wind-works.org/cms/index.php?id=81&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=4757&cHash=4d029b7594485d4ad32d885690a4febe 3/4
28/10/2017 WIND-WORKS: Betz: Everything You Need to Know about Wind Turbines Was Written in 1927
Remarkably, Betz is prescient about the need for standardized testing of wind turbines. He could
have been writing about the introduction of new wind turbines in 2017 and not 1927.
He notes that, Since the manufacturers have an interest in making their windmills appear as
efficient as possible, they naturally use the best of the various test results in their advertising,
and it thus happens that much too high performances are announced in very many catalogs.Of
course in Betzs day they used catalogs to search for products and not Google. His lament,
unfortunately, could be applied to the dozens of Internet miracles that are circulated endlessly on
social media as various wind panaceas not like those other windmillsthe ones that work.
Betz then singles out for mention one of the worlds first wind turbine test sites, where Relatively
good results have recently been obtained in the Agricultural Institute of Oxford University. His
citation notes that Oxford published the results of their testing in 1926.
More than 80-years after Betzs paper--and after Oxford published the results from their test
field--the American Wind Energy Association instituted standardized testing of small wind
turbines. The trade group debated whether they should do so for nearly three decades.
Conclusion
While Betzs paper is most widely known for his conclusion that the best a conventional wind
turbine can hope to do is capture 16/27 of the energy in the wind, his discourse is chocked full of
the elemental design characteristics of modern wind turbines.
So much time, money, and talent have been squandered over the decades through ignorance of
this early work in wind energy.
We in the wind industry ignore Betzs wisdom from 1927 at our peril.
1 0 / 2 0 11 - 1 0 / 2 0 1 7 - A L L R I G H T S R E S E R V E D B Y W I N D - W O R K S . O R G - PA U L G I P E - W E B W O R K B Y W W W. B E E B O X . C O M
http://www.wind-works.org/cms/index.php?id=81&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=4757&cHash=4d029b7594485d4ad32d885690a4febe 4/4