Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lightning Protection
9th-13th November, 2009 Curitiba, Brazil
Abstract A new field instrument, the Zed-Meter, has been the geometric resistance, and for transmission tower
developed to test the low-current lightning impulse footings the geometric resistance is dominant.
impedance Z of transmission tower footings and ground
electrodes. Surge impedance of test leads provided effective In order to understand the response of the transmission
reaction electrodes for the measurements, even when
tower to lightning surges, a new test method [5][6] was
ungrounded on frozen soil. Cross-calibration studies were
carried out using a variety of low-frequency measurements proposed and developed. This test method used a
of footing resistance Rf to establish the ratio Z : Rf for compact current impulse source and distributed leads as
compact and distributed electrodes. reaction antennas to measure the transient impedance Z of
transmission tower ground electrodes in-situ.
1 INTRODUCTION
This paper describes refinements of the test method [6] to
It has been traditional to measure low-frequency improve repeatability and then reports the results obtained
resistance Rf of transmission tower structures using low from Zed-Meter tests on 70 different transmission
currents and to use this resistance in estimates of structures, ranging in low frequency resistance from
transmission lightning performance. The measured 0.1 to 200 .
values of Rf can be adjusted for ionization and impulse
effects [1] to give: 2 PREVIOUS STUDIES
Low-current transient impedance Z;
High-current transient impedance ZI . Many researchers have carried out studies of the impulse
response of ground electrodes. Generally, experiments
Theoretically [2][3] and experimentally, a number of have been carried out on isolated electrodes. Analysis has
factors affect the ratios Z : Rf and ZI : Rf, including: considered either compact or distributed electrodes.
The contribution of ground plane surge response
and series inductance of distributed electrodes, 2.1 Impedance versus time for rods
which tend to increase the ratio Z : Rf ;
Reductions in the soil resistivity with increasing Bellaschi [7] applied lightning impulses in the range of
frequency, and the effect of displacement current 0.6 to 9 kA to driven rods. A high-voltage impulse
in the soil dielectric, which both tend to reduce generator, with a plan view in Fig. 1, was used.
the ratio Z : Rf ;
Ionization when local electric field gradients The typical voltages and currents were measured with a
exceed 150-300 kV/m in soil, increasing the voltage divider (VD) and cathode ray oscilloscope
apparent size of small electrodes and reducing (CRO). Some typical results for driven rods are shown in
the ratio ZI : Rf as current increases. Fig. 2. For currents in the range 1.5 to 6.5 kA in
waveforms AF, AX and BJ, the voltage and current
Recent work [4] has suggested that, while ionization can waveforms were similar, suggesting that an instantaneous
play an important role in the response of small electrodes ratio ZI(t)=v(t)/i(t) was constant for the 6x13 s or
such as a single driven rod, for the typical 5 to 50 m 12x50s test waves used in this work. The ground
dimensions of transmission tower foundations and ground around the test rod exploded in waveform BT, giving a
electrodes the role of ionization is limited. A recent sharp reduction in the ZI (t) ratio after 15 s.
analysis suggests that, for extensive electrodes, the
ionization effect reduces the contact resistance but not
329
in close agreement. Later at 10-25 s, there is a broad
minimum of ZI (t)=27 s for 60 kA and 22 at 120 kA.
Simplified [1] and detailed [8] modelling also suggest that
surge currents of more than 100 kA are needed to cause
ionization effects in large foundations.
330
The electrode under test provides the ground reference for The Zed-Meter test methods were co-developed with a
the oscilloscope, and potential to remote earth is series of numerical simulations [6] using the NEC-4
measured on a lead oriented at 90. A typical result for computer program [14] for frequency-domain analysis of
an 18-m buried wire is shown in Fig. 6. antennas in soil of finite conductivity. Numerical
simulations were carried out of a steel lattice transmission
tower with four footings, equipped with a single overhead
groundwire. A Fourier transform provided the frequency
spectrum of the time-domain pulse input. The NEC-4
computer program was used to compute the potential rise
from tower base to remote potential lead at each
frequency, considering the influence of the currents in the
reaction lead, tower and OHGW. An inverse Fourier
transform then gave the time-domain voltage and current
waveforms.
3 ZED-METER METHOD
331
be higher than the surge impedance of the reaction leads
(444 ). The initial surge impedance is measured with a
2% relative standard deviation. After the slow reflections
from the terminations, the instrument eventually reaches a
second stable reading.
4 ZED-METER RESULTS
332
In this case, an L/Rf time constant of 0.3 s corresponds
to an equivalent series inductance of 8 H for the four
buried wires in parallel.
333
Fig. 15 shows that impedances read out at 500 ns and resistivity and type of electrode. Generally, Z<Rf for the
1000 ns were highly correlated, but significantly lower, tested towers with compact electrodes and high soil
than the Rf measurements taken at the same time in test resistivity, and Z>Rf for distributed electrodes in
campaigns. Towers with compact (local foundation) agreement with previous findings and modelling.
electrodes in Fig. 15 had Z<Rf with good correlation for
all but the lowest values of Rf<3 and Z<7. 6 REFERENCES
In contrast, Fig. 16 shows that all ten distributed [1] W. A. Chisholm and W. Janischewskyj, "Lightning surge
electrodes with buried wire length greater than 40 m had response of ground electrodes", IEEE Transactions on
Power Delivery, vol. 4, n. 2, pp. 1329-1337, Jan. 1989.
Z>Rf at 500 ns, and only two of these ten had Z<Rf at
[2] S. Visacro. A comprehensive approach to the grounding
800 ns. The four towers treated with four, 38-m radial response to lightning currents. IEEE Transactions on
wires tended to behave more like compact electrodes, Power Delivery, vol. 22, n. 1, pp. 381-386, Jan. 2007.
with Z<Rf at 800 ns. [3] S.S. Devgan and E.R. Whitehead, Analytical Models for
Distributed Grounding Systems, IEEE Transactions on
Power Apparatus and Systems vol. PAS-92, n. 5, pp. 1763-
1770, Sept. 1973.
[4] CIGRE Working Group C4.406, Performance of trans-
mission line grounding electrodes for lightning currents.
Electra, in press
[5] W. A. Chisholm, J. Williamson, S. Burnett and G. Hodges,
"Recent Progress in Design and Test Methods for
Transmission Line Ground Electrodes", VII International
Symposium on Lightning Protection, Curitiba, Nov. 2003.
[6] E. Petrache, W.A. Chisholm and A. Phillips, "Evaluating the
transient impedance of transmission line towers", IX
International Symposium on Lightning Protection, Foz do
Iguau, Brazil, Nov. 2007.
[7] P.L. Bellaschi, Impulse and 60-Cycle Characteristics of
Fig. 16 Comparison of Zed-Meter results at 500 and 1000 ns Driven Grounds, Transactions of the American Institute of
with Rf for distributed electrodes [16] Electrical Engineers, vol. 60, n. 3, pp. 123-128, Mar. 1941.
[8] A.C. Liew and M. Darveniza, Dynamic model of impulse
The results in Fig. 16 suggest that distributed electrodes characteristics of concentrated earths, Proceedings of the
IEE, vol. 121, n. 2, pp. 123135, 1974.
have high initial impulse impedance, as has been reported
[9] A. Phillips and J.G. Anderson, High Current Impulse
in many previous studies. Testing of Full-Scale Ground Electrodes, Technical Report
1006866, EPRI, Palo Alto, California. 2002.
5 CONCLUSION [10] Y. Yasuda, S. Kondo, T. Hara, J. Ikeda, Y. Sonoi and
Y. Furoka, Measurement of Soil-Ionization Characteristics
With an optimum placement of surge source, it is possible of Grounding and its Analysis using Dynamic Grounding
to inject fast-rising surge currents into the base of Model, IEEJ Transactions on Power and Energy, vol.
transmission tower foundations and ground electrodes 123B, n. 6, pp. 718-724, Jun 2003.
using the surge impedance of a wire on the surface of the [11] L.V. Bewley, Theory and Tests of the Counterpoise,
Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical
earth for the return path, rather than the resistance of an
Engineers, vol. 53, n. 8, pp. 1163-1172, Aug. 1934.
auxiliary remote electrode. In some cases, tests with no [12] S. Visacro and G. Rosado, Response of Grounding
auxiliary electrodes at all over frozen soil gave Electrodes to Impulsive Currents: An Experimental
satisfactory results as long as reaction wire length was Evaluation, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic
sufficiently long. Compatibility, vol. 51, n. 1, pp. 161-164, Feb. 2009.
[13] CIGRE Working Group C4.2.02, Methods for measuring the
For many tested transmission tower foundation earth resistance of transmission towers equipped with earth
electrodes, the settling time to a constant ratio of voltage wires, CIGRE Brochure 275, Jun. 2005.
to current was on the order of 300 ns. Settling time was [14] G.J. Burke, Numerical Electromagnetics Code NEC-4
Method of Moments, Lawrence Livermore National
increased for guyed structures and for lines with insulated
Laboratory UCRL-MA-109338, 1992.
overhead groundwires. Close agreement between current [15] W.A. Chisholm, Zed-Meter Trials at Manitoba Hydro,
into reaction lead and current into the tower was a good Proving the Concept and Equipment in Frozen Soil, EPRI,
indicator that oscillations had decayed to acceptable Palo Alto, CA and Manitoba Hydro: 2008.
levels. [16] W. A. Chisholm, Summary of Zed-Meter Field Tests:
Transient Imedance of Transmission Line Grounds, EPRI,
The ratio of measured transient impedance Z to low- Palo Alto, CA: 2006. Product ID 1012314.
frequency resistance Rf varied, depending on soil
334