Unsatisfactory Emergent
Ideas are completely Some ideas are realistic
unrealistic, cost and
Practicality
logistic factors have not
been considered.
Ideas are not based on
research. No sources are
Quality used.
Research
of
ideas
There is no apparent
reason for proposed
Reasoning ideas, no supporting
evidence to back up
arguments.
Ideas are presented in a
way that does not make
sense. Presentation
shows little to no effort.
Presentation of Technology, if any, is only
ideas used to make the project
look flashy, with no real
benefit.
The group was not able to
work together, one or a
few group members did
Teamwork &
most of the work, group
collaboration
members did not listen to
each other.
Good Outstanding
Most ideas are realistic, with All ideas are very realistic,
while many are not. some consideration of cost with excellent consideration
Cost and logistic factors and logistics. of cost and logistics
are barely considered. involved.
There is some evidence Ideas are fairly well Ideas are very well
of research behind researched, shows a good researched and shows a
ideas, but there are general understanding of deep understanding of
gaps in understanding. relevant knowledge. Most relevant knowledge.
Some sources are used, sources are credible, but there Sources used are credible
but cited improperly. are some mistakes in citing. and properly cited.
Ideas proposed mostly Ideas proposed show good Ideas proposed are very
show reasoning, but reasoning, and are backed up logical, and backed up
evidence is sometimes with some evidence. using lots of evidence.
unclear.
Some ideas are Ideas are mostly presented Ideas are presented in a
presented clearly, but clearly and concisely. very clear, concise, and
some are unclear or Presentation shows good easy to follow way.
hard to follow. effort. Technology, if any, is Presentation shows high
Presentation shows used to improve the project. level of care and
some effort. consideration. Technology,
Technology, if any, is if any, is used to take the
not always used project to another level.
effectively to improve
the project.
The group worked The group generally worked The group worked together
together with some well together, group members extremely well, used each
disputes. Not all group all contributed to the project, others strengths to benefit
members contributed to and most listened to each the project, and listened to
the project, some group other. each others input.
members listened to
each other.