Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Below-the-Hook
L i ft i n g Devices
AN A M E R I C A N NATIONAL STANDARD
"-. ...-
,.,_. HS ..,
-
-- .O.SME
,..,.,....,.-.,,..,,_ ............... - ..
.... OomOHS
8eld ..,
c ,,
,o INOOSTRlES. 01.,,.71&
C_ASME.,...,-..0
..._.
No,.,.
-... --
_............ _ ....... ,... -
&oldlo<:AIDH>US'lR<E. o!d<l>II
No< ... ..
... ,I01l1311 I 7:?'S2:U GM'T
Design of
B e l ow - th e - H o o k
l i ft i n g Devlces
c-............... ...-
P,_ "' >IS-.. _, ASME S...10.
'CA>D O'IOUSTRIES. D1H<>lH
The next edition of this Standard is scheduled for publication in 2014 Thls Standard will become
ASME lssues written replies to inquir\es concerning interpretations of technical aspects of ttus
Standard. Periodically certaln actions of the ASME BTH Committee may be published as Cases.
Cases and interpretations are publlshed on the ASME Web slte under the Committee Pages at
Errata to codes and standards may be posted on the ASME Web site under the Committee Pages to
provrde correcllons to incorrectly published items, orto corree! typographical or grammatkal errors
in coces and standards. Such errata shall be used on the date posted.
automatically recewe an e-mail nofification when errata are posted to a particular cede or standard.
Th. cenen can be found cr the aproprlate Commlltee Page after selectmg "Errata" ll thc "pubttcauon
ln!orn,atior," secttcn
Thls code or standard was developed under crocedurcs accredued as meeting the critena for American Nauonal
Standards. The St;:maards (omm,uec that approved the code 01 standard was balanced to assu-e that individuals hom
ccmnetem and concerned interests have hadan cpportururv to parnclpate the prooosed code or s1andard was made
avajlabte for pubhc rl'Yew and comment that provides an cppcnumtv for addlllonal publ,c input trcm lndustry, academm,
A5M[ <loes no! "approve." "rate." or "endo1se" ny uern. consrrucuon. proprietmy devke or actw11'.
ASME does nol takc any pos1Uon w1th resrect to the val1ditv of any petent rtghts asscrted ln econecuoo w1th env
items mentioned In ths decument, and doe, not underuk, to msure anyonc utllzlng a standard ;igamst liabilltv for
mfrlngement of any apoltcabre !etters patent. nor assume a ny such liabil\ty. users of rnuc or standard are Hpressly
i!dvsed that deterrmnaucn of the vahtl lyl of any such narent r,ghts, and !he rlsk of infrln1emen t o! such t
11:h s, rs
Copyright ID 2012 by
Printed n U.S.A.
I
,,__...o.s,.,En....-
....IO,C.0.IO OHD<ISl"RIEli. OIIIS07U
- .. ttS-oc-,_MIME
Ho!b Rcul<.lQll/311112:!12,l<Jlo!T
....... -- - OH!;
CONTENTS
Foreword
Committee Roster vi
l-1 Purpose l
l-2 Scope 1
1-5 Defrruncns 3
l-6 Symbols . 6
l-7 References 9
2-1 General 12
3-l General . . . . . . l4
4-1 General 4]
4-2 Sheaves 4l
4-5 Gearmg 44
4-6 Bearings . . 44
4-7 Shaftmg .. 46
4-8 Fasteners 48
s-i General 51
ih
,,,
.....,..-- .. -
c.,,,,,oM "8ME ..-
..,,. _ ASME
,-,
Sold<>'C-"D INOU:;IRIES, Ol01M
"OllwRculc,2013/JIII 22.52.lGMl
Figures
42
4-2 Sheavc Gap
Tables
4-1 Strength Fncrors for Calculnting Load Capnoty (A menean Standard Tooth
fotms) t
45
4-2 L10 Lift:
'"
e__ ...,._
SOld IO.
C,lill ll<IJUSTRIE 0, ..010
P,-.. .. vtS ---.0.St.<li
NolkwR ....,,>13111 Z2i2'1' C.
111'
........ --.,- ...- ..-- .... IH!l
FOREWORli>
There have becn man y formal requests for interpretation of the limited structura! design cruena
mdustry has for quite sorne time expressed a need for a comprehensive design standard for
below-the hook lifting devrces thnt would complement the sofeey reqmrements of ASME 630.20.
Ali editions of ASME 1330.20 included structurnl design criterm oricnted toward the industrial
mnnufachlring corrununity requirmg a minimum design foctorofthroe, based on thc yield strength
of the mnterml, recent editions alsc included design criteria for the fatigue failurc mode. However,
members of the constructron commurnty exprcssed the need for desrgn criteria more suitable to
their opcratmg condrtions, induding a lowcr design factor, and the necessrty to address other
failure modessuch as frncture,shearand buckling, and design tapies, such as impact and fasteners.
A Des.gn Task Group was created in 1997 lo begm work on a desrgn standard as a compamon
document to ASME 83020 Toe ASME BTH Standards Committec on the Design of Bclow-the
Hook Lifting Devices was lormed out of thc Design 'lask Group and held its organizatlonal
ASMF. BTH-l-2005, Design of Below-tht:-Hook Lifng Devices, contaned nve chapters Scope
and Definitions, Lrer Clflssificltions, Structural Design, Mechcmcal Des.gn. and Elcctrkal
Componerus. Thrs Standard, in!cnded for general industry and construction, sets forth two
design .categories for Jifters bascd on the mngtutude and variation of loading and operating
and environmenta! conditrons. The two des.gn caregones provide dicrent design factora or
dete.nnimngallowable static stress limits. Five Service Classes, based on load cycles, are provided
The Servrce Class establishes allowable stress rnnge values for hfter strucrural members and
to provide background for the Standard's provisions Users are encouraged to consult it
ASME BTH-1-2008 incorporated editorial revisrons and two new mechamcal design sections
far gnp ranoand vacuum-hftmg device design ASMEBTH-1-2008 was approved by theAmencan
Thrs editon of ASME BTHl-2011 mcorporates revsions throughout the Standard and the
addilton of new mechanical des.gn section for fluid power systcms. ASME BTH-1-2011 was
,,
cov,,AS>II"--
......,.. .,,,, .... ,, __ A_E
fk,I01<,,CI\IDNOUSTRIE$ 011111
(The Jollowln; Is the rostcr of the Commlttee et the ume of approval of thls Standard.)
D. Duerr. (ha,r
T. W. Schellens, Secrewry
J. D. Edmundson, Konecranes/P&H
J 1/
. Loschelder, Loschelder Engineering Co
Eng,neers
..-
"'-""'" SMf .._.,
General. ASME Srandards are developed and mamtnined wuh the mtent to represen! the
consensus ofconcemed interests. Assuch, users of this Standard may internctwith the Committee
Proposing Revisions. Rev.srons are made periodtcally to the Standard to incorpomte chnnges
that appearnecessry or desrruhle, as demonstrated by the cxpcrience ganed from the apphcanon
The Committee wetcomes proposals for rcvlsrcns to this Standard. Such proposals should be
a specific as possible, c1!ing the paragrnph number(s), the pmposed wording, and a detailed
Proposing a Case. Cases may be issued for the purpose of provrdng altcmanvc rules when
justified, to pcrmit early rmplamentanon of an approved revrsion when thc need is urgent, orto
provide rules not covered by existing provisrons Cases are cffective lmmedjately upon
ASME approval and shall be posted on the ASME Comrmtree Web p,ige.
Requests for Cases shall provide a Statement of Need and Background lntormauon. The request
should identify the Standnrd, the paragraph, figure or table number(s), and be wrltten as a
Question and Reply in the same formal as existing Cases Reguests for Casesshould also mdrcate
the apphcable edition(s) of the Standard to which the proposed Case applies.
jnterpratabons. Upon rcquest, the BTH Commrttee will render an interpretation of any reguire
ment of the Standard lnterpretations can only be rendered in response to a written request sent
o
t the Secretary o the 81H Standards Committee.
The request for interpretaticn should be clear nnd unambigucus. [t is further recommended
Subect Cite the apphcable parngraph number,) and the topic of the inquiry
Edmon- Cite the applicable edrtion of the Standard for which the interpretation is
being requested
suitable for general understanding and use, not as a request for an approval
of a propnetary desrgn or srtuatron The inqrnrer may also include any plans
or drawmgs that are necessary to explam the question, however, they shou/d
Requests that are notin th1sformatmay be.rewntten in the.ippropnate formal by the Committee
prior o
t bemg answered, which may inadvertently change the mtent of the original reqnest.
interpretation may appeal to the cognizant ASME Comm1ttee or SubcomniiHee. ASME does 1101
''npprove," "certify," "rate," or "endorse" any 1tem, construction, propnetary device, or act1v1ty.
Attending Committee Meetings. The BTH Standards Committee regularly holds meetings.
which are open to the public. Persons w1shing to attend any mcctmg should contact the Secretary
vil
- ... -.l:Clll311l1U2.lGM1
""'-"'""""'"'"'""11"""'"'"_ ........... .,tr.<
ASME B T H - 1 - 2 0 1 1
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Following approval by the ASME BTH Standards Commitlee, and after pubhc review, ASME
IITH-1-2011 was approved by the American National Srnndards lnstitute on September 23, 2011.
Revistons introduced wthin the20ll edition of ASME BTH-1 are idcntihed by a m11rgm note, (11)
,_,
Parngrnph 1-4.8 deleted
Reviscd
1-5.2 Revised
1-5.3 Revrsed
15.4 Revrsed
-------
.JD 3-2 . Revrsed
Editorinlly revised
Equntions (34.7) and (3-48) revised
- 25
,.kU,1-
'
4-5.4 References updated
4A
48 4-9 Revrsed
4-10.3 Revrsed
4-11 J\dded
51 5-1 3
s..1.8 Added
53
5-7.3 Revtsed
vur
"'
- ..,
"'"'""'- .. _
-..
._..,_/\SMf
) .
$00
0 o,.CN[)tlOOSTflU. '"''"'
lo,R ...1<)Qlll)jllil.SUG1,U
ASME BlH 1-2011
Chapter 1
l-l PURPOSE
Commentary: ASME BTH1 addresses only des1gn
This Standard sets forth design crtera for requirements. As such, lhis Standard should be used in
ASME 830.20, Below-the-Hook Liftmg Devices. This conjunction with ASME 630.20, which addresses salety
by interpretations of a 630 safety standard The effective date of this Standnrd shall be one year
of this Standard.
(ll) 1-2 SCOPE
When a hfter is being modifted, tts design shall be
This Standard provides mmimum structural and revrewed relative to this Standard, and the need to meet
mechanical design and electrical componen\ selection th1s Standard shall be evaluated by the manufacturer or
De vices
The provisrons in this Stnndnrd apply to the desrgn
Commentary: lt 1s not the intent of this Standard to
or modification ofbelow-lhe-hook lifting devces Com
requ,re retrohning o-f ex,sting lifting devices
p!iance wrth requirements and. critcna that may be
marking, construction, mstallation, mspectmn, testing, Lifting devices shnll be des1gned by, or under the
maintenance, and cperanco of below-the-hook lifting d1rect supervision of, a qunlified person.
devices.
The prov1s1ons defined in thJs Standard address the Commentary: Although always implied, this provi
most common and brondly apphcuble aspects of the sion now explicitly states that !he design of below-the
design of below-the-hook liiting devrces The quajled hook lft1ng devices is the responsibility of a qualified
person shall determine the appropriate methods to be person. This requirement has been estabhshed in recog
used to address design ssues that are not explidtly n i t i on of !he i m pac t tha1 the p e rf ormance of a l ift!ng
ccvered zn the standard so as to provide design facrors device has on workplace salety, the complexity of the
nnd/or performance consisrent with the mtent of thrs design process, and the level of knowledge and training
e-..- -,
- ,o
...
..,___ .,_ .. _...,.,..._.
.,.,us io.-,-MM
__ ,._OH& C,,.D -,OU<IRIU. O!!ISI....
Commentarv: The reciuirements of ttus Standard li n e ar finite element analysis will typically show peak
are presentad wherever possib!e in a munner that is stresses that ind1cate failure. w!iere tailure is defmed as
dimensionally independent, thus allowing application of the pomt al which the applied load reaches the loss of
these reourrements usmq either U.S. Customary umts function load (or l1mi1 stme) of the pan or device under
(USCUI or lnternational System of Units ;so. U.S. considerntion Th1s is panicularly true wheo evaluating
Customary units are the primarv units usad in this sta11c s treng th . While the use of such methods is not
sect10n 2-3) Resolution of loads into forces nnd stress l-4.5 Material
and the servce Class to better match the desipn of the written proprietary spedlication.
tjus Standard are based on the assumphon o analysis used in the mechanical c o mponents described in
although other analysls methods may be used The anal lndustry-wide specifica1ions are those from organiza
ysm techniques and models used by the qualified person tions such as ASTM lnternational (ASTM). the American
shall accnrately represent the loads, material properties, lron and Steel !nstitute {AISI), and the Society of
and cevrce geometry stress values resultmg from the Automotive Engineers (SAE). A propnetary specificat,on
analysis shall be of suneble form to permit correlaton is one developed by an individual manufacturer.
methods effecuvely compute average srresses acting on the reqtrements of ANSI/ AWS 014.1 The design
a structural or mechanical elemenL strength of welds shaU be as defined in para. 3-3.4. When
..........,,..,ASME ..om-.ol
conflicts exist between ANSI/ AWS 014.1 and this these temperatures, the mechanical propert1es of mos1
St au dar-d, the reguirements of this Standard shal) materials are greatly reduced over those at amb1ent lf
Commentarv: ANSI/AWS 0 1 4 . 1 rs cuec as the than the simple elevated temperature va l ue, must be
basls for weld design and welding procedures. Thls used in determimng the design rared load and life of the
established by ASME 830.20 The allowable stresses for Of importance when evaluaiing the etfects of temper
welds are modified in this Standard to provide the ature is the temperatura of the llfter component rather
higher design factors deemed necessary for llfting than the ambient temperatura. A J!fter may move bnefly
Jifter that handles very hot items may have soma com
1-4.7 Temperature
ponents that become heated due to contact.
The design provisons of tlus Smndard are consrdered
Commentary: The tem p e r a t u re hrruts stated are surrounding the lifng devi:e (para. 1-4..7).
quallty checks in current prectlce, the risk of sucf failure cyc/c, load. onc seguence of two load reversals that define
is reduced. Thus, the Committee selected the 25F a rnnge bctwecn max1mum and mimmum load
a summer desert env,ronrnent. Data from the ASME design faclor: the ratio of the limit stale stress(es) of an
Boler and Pressure Vessel Code material design tables element to the permissible mternal strcss(es) created by
mdicate that sorne carbon steels have already begun to the externa] forcc(s) that acts upan the element
decline in 'both yield stress and allowable tension stress (para 1-6.1).
at 150"F 166QC) fntigJJ.r lifc the number of load cycles of a speofic type
In sorne ind u stria l uses, lifting devices can be sub and magnitude that a member sustains before fa1lure
--- --,
.......
$1!;. .....,,,-
..
...,....
....,,,,-" ...... _..,,,
8oadto'"-"PllfOU,;J"RtfS. 01'"111
uos: a machinery u n i t that is used for liftmg and slinr an assembly to be used for lifting whcn ccnoecrect
Iowermg (para. 1-5.1). to n hoist or liftmg ccvrce ar the sling's upper end and
lugs, padeyes, trunnions, and similar appurtenances 1 lrength iinnt sl11/e: linnting condition affectlng thc safety)
/imil slate: a condition in which a structurc or componen! l. capaciry is reached (para 1-5.1). ./
become, unfit /or scrvcc, such as brittle fracture, plnstic $/TC5S conemmuoc: localized stress considerably higher
collapse, cxccssrve deformation, d urability, fatigue, than avernge (even in uniformly loaded cross secnons
instability, nnd is judged either to be no longer useful of uniform thickness) due toabrupt chunp;es in geomctry
far its intended fundan (sero1cenbility limif stnte) o r t o or tocatzed lo<1ding (para. 3-4.1).
(p;irn. 1-4.4).
loor/, rnied thcmaximum load for which thcliftm.; device
1!> dc1>1t,'llaled by the manufacturcr (pnra. 1-4.3) slrucluml mcmbcr. a componcnl or ng1d ac;semhly of com
ge;ir reducer, and adjustnble speec tr.msnussron b1itllc frncture: abrupl de.avage w1th littlc or no pnor
modificntion- any change, nddirion to, or reconsrrucncn compncl scc/ion: a structural member cross-section thal
of a \ifter componcnt (secnon 1-2). cnn develop a fully plastic stress distribution bc.fore the
mxed degrec m a n applicable field or cerncete of pro cffcctivc lc11gth the e q u i v l e n t length K/ used 111
<1 bility of a struct ure. to preserve 1llJ ma intamability, dura or other reductions of cross-secHonal area {para 3-2.1)
(
bility, or fun ction of machinery under normal usage
effectroe widlh the reduced width of a plate which, with
(para. 1-5.1).
an assumed unilorm stress distribution, produces !he
followed (section 1-2) the actual plate width w1th its nonuniform stress
adv isa bility of which depends on t he facts in e ach fnying surfnce; !he pl;me of contact between two plics of
---,,. .,,,-..,
..,_,,,.,11.-.-...-.-.s .. e ""' ;C,\ID 1NOU$11\!U, ...-, 91
io
gross area full cr oss-secnonat area of the membcr L10benr111g life the basic:: rlling or specihration !ifo of a
local bHcklmg: lhe buckling of 11 compression elemenl /ock-11p: l cond1t10n whereby fnction in tht: drive system
that may precpitate the failure of lhe whole member prevents back-dnving (para. 4-55).
axial force in the bolt (paro. 3-4 5) vacmm1 lifter- a below-the-hook liflmg dev1ce fot Jifting
between the faymg surtaces by the rlampmg arnon of vnc1111111 pad: a dev1ce th.it applics l holding force on the
uubmced length: thc dlstance bcrween braced pomts ) 1-5.4 Definitions for Ct-iapter 5 (11)
(11) 1-5.3 Deflnitions for Chapter 4 functions of an apparatus (parn 1-5 4).
bnck-dnvmg: a condition where the load rmparts motion con/rol panel. an assembly of romponents tha! governs
to the drivc system (para. 4-55) theflow ofpower to or from a motor or otherequipment
monon betwecn two boches by the normal force pressmg co11/rol syste,w c1r1 assembly 01 group of deviccs that
the bodies together (para. 4-9.1). g ov ern or r egu l a\, the o pNation of aJ) pp<irltus
(para 5-3.1).
drim: system: an assembly of components that govems
the starting, stopping, force, speed, and direction con/ro/ler. a dev1ce or group of dev1ces that govern, in
imparted to a moving apparatus (para. l-5.3). a predetermined manner, the power dehvered to the
J.
J of a pressunzed fluid, either liquid or gas. Toe term
duty cyclc:
'(' apphes o
t both hydrauhcs, which uses a pressurized
tune on
U iquid
ompressed
such as
arr
oil
or
or water,
other gases
and pneumatics,
(section 4-11)
whir:.h uses duty cydc =
1 1me on + !Jme o
ff x 100
grip ratio. the ratio of the sum of the horizontal forces and is expressed as .o percentage (para 521).
the load rs 100,000 lb end the lve load is 50,000 lb, the
gnp rallo s
i 2. For purposes of this calculation, the 3
3T2 ,. 100 = 60%
weight of the load does no! mclude the wcight of the
gripping force. the force thal the liftmg devrce excrts on suspended from a crane, that requ1res powcr from a
(
the load (para. 4-9.1). source externa] to the crane (para 5-6.3)
-,.- ......-
P,- .... 1,..:--...- ....E
,.,,..,....,- .. ,,.-- ..,.,...,,,.-"""' -s
SoldoCAIDll'ltllmRI
I< .....
ASME BTHi-2011
gr01111il (growtdet/J: electrically connected to earlh or to b, = ucrunt ne! width of a pm-connccted plate
sorne conductm; body that serves 111 place: of the cartl, betwecn the cdgc of the hcle and the edgo
rctif1cr: a device for convertin; alternating curren[ mto e, : bending coeffic1ent dependen! u pon
C
: stress category const.int for fatigue
swilclr a devicc for makmg, breakmg, or changing the
analys1s (paro. 3-4.5)
connections m an elecmc crcwt (para. 1-5.4)
fl
operation of contactors. relnys, or other rcmote!y
c. : coefficient applied to bending term in
operated dev.ces (parn. !>-3.1).
interlction equation for prismat1c.
NOTE; Sorne symbots m3y have d!fferem defmitions w11hm this e, : strength reduction factor for pin
No. 6 and CMAA #70, respecnvelv). Where notation d1d D, = plil diameter (parl. 3--3.3.1)
1
not exrst. urnqve symbols are defmed herem and have E = modulus of e!11sticity
been selected to be clear m meanmg to the user. = 29,000 ksi (200 000 MP11) for steel
(pura 3-2.2)
(Table 3-1)
!,, = cr1t1cal stres!., ksi (MPa) (para. 3-2.5)
divided by the design factor, ksi (MPa) cgmnst twJSt or lateral displncement of
f:/, Fey
'
= E ul e r stress abou! the x or y axis, as
braced agatnst rwrst or lateral displace
)
indicated, drvrded by the design factor, ment, maxrrnom span between supports
(para. 3-2.3.2)
F, = a ! l ow a bl c bee nng stress, ksi (MPa )
F, compress1ve residual stress in ksi bending member lor which the full
= lange,
subjected to combined tension and shear M = a!lowable maJOr axis momenr for tees and
{pnra. 3-3.2)
(para 3-4.5)
(para. 3-2.3.1)
strength, ksi {MPa) (para. 3-2.1)
Fv = allowable shear stress, ksr (MPa) M1 = smaller bending moment al the end of
ksi (MPa) (para 3-2.1) N = des1red des1gn fatgue life m cydes of the
web, ksi (MPa} (Table 3-1) cydes at stress range, SR,, (pMa 3-4 2)
h = clear depth of the plate parallel to the P,, = allowable single plane fracture strength
applied shear force at the section under beyond !he pinhole, kips (N)
(para. 3-3.3.1)
iovestigation For rolled shapes, this
va!ue may be taken as the clear distance P, = al\owable shear capaciry o a bolt in a
between flanges less the fillet ar comer slip-criticaJ connection, kips (N)
degree of fixity at each end of thc rnember R = d1stance from the center of the hole to
= the actual unbraced length of the the applied lond, in (mm) (para 3-3.3.1)
member, in. (mm) (para. 3-2.2) varinble used in thc cumulatJve fatigue
e_""' .....HS
,,,_.., ,
,..""'"'"
....
..,....
. ,.
'""' - ASl.l!l - 10 CI\I
O ..OIJS"l"IES Oll
No,.,.,_.,_...,,,., ...tt,...,_._..,.,..,.,,. ..s f'OI '' "u :!01"3/11 2::l "OMl
ASME BTHl-2011
nnalysis (para. 3-4.6), radius of edgc of F = rmmmum gripp1ng force on each side of
r = radius of gyrntion about the lXIS under F, = radia l cornponent of thc actual becrtng
radrus o curvature of the edge of the GR,.,,., = minimum gr1p ratio (para. 4-9.1)
(para 3-2.3.2)
[para. 4-7.6.3(a)]
[para 4-7.S(a)]
w = leg size of the remforcng Or rnntoming
!para 4-7.S(n)l
(para 3--2.3.1)
[para 4-7.S(c)]
connected plate, m. (mm) (Commentary
d
, = s h e ar plaue ! o c a ti n g angle for p in unnotchcd spec1men in reversed bending,
S
= computed fatigue stress, ksf (MPaJ
berween the pad and the material when the
!para. 4-7.6.3(d)J
endure one million revolutions, per bearing
Dr diametral prtch, in. -l (mm'") (para 4-5.3) strength, ksi (MPa) [para. 4-7.S(a)]
F. = axial component of the actual bearmg load, UPC calculated ultirnate vacuum pad capticity
e.a,,,.,,.,,.,...,..-
---""""
....lo"CA.ll>INOlJSTIUU Olfl,07'"
....... _ .. _...,9 __ ,_, __
- ....... - .... .....;:.Dllill!\ ?ZS1.1' GMT
ASME IITIH-2011
V = surface velodty of shaft, ft/mm (m/sec) ASME 017.1-1967 (R2008J, Keys and Keyseats
V, mlmmum vacuum leve] spedfied at thepad Publishe.r: The American Society of Mechanical
1
VPR = maxun um calculated pad rnting NY 10016-5990; Order Department: 22 Luw Dnve, P.O.
[para. 4--7.S(b)l
DIN 6885-1, Orive Type Fastenings W t t h ou t Taper
r.v = portian of the computed shear stress not
Aclion; Paraliel Keys, Keyways, Deep Pattern
d u e t o the fluct u a ti ng !oads, ksi (MPa)
Publisher: Deutsches lnstihll f-i.Jr Normung, e V. (DIN},
[para 4r7.6.3(d)J
Am DIN-Platz Burggrafenstrnl'.se 6, 10787 Berlm,
"
J = computed combmed fotigue shear stress,
Germany (www.din.de)
ksr (MPa) Jpara 4-7.6.3{b))
r
p_ = portian of the computed shear stress due !CS 2-2000 (R2UOSJ, lndustrrn.l Control ancl Systems:
[para. 4-7.6.3(d)J
600 Volts
r, = computed tors.cnal shear stress, ksi (MPa) ICS 6-1993 (R2001, R2DU6), l n du s t na l Control and
[para. 4-7.S(b)J
Systems: Enclosures
Tv = computed transverse shcar stress, ksi (MPn) MC 1-2006, Revision 1-2007, Motors and Generators
O = angle of vacuum pad interface surface mea Assodation (NEMA), 1300 North 17th Street, Rosslyn,
and C alculaon Methods for l!wolute Spur and s t a n d-al o ne standard to the greatest extent pract1caL
Helical Gear Teeth1 However. sorne areas are best su1ted to be covered by
EHifnn, D. S., Wme, G., Sputo, T.. and Samuel. S.. 1992,
lnsttrute (ANSI), 25 Wesl 43rd Srreet, New York, NY 10036 Journal, Vol. 29, No. 2
'
c_..,. ..E.,.,,_
..-. ... ,HS-....,...,.,AS,,.E Solf1<CAIOll'IOl!STRIU.Ot0Mlllg
"Engineering FAOs Section 4.4.2." (2003) Pub lis her American Petroleum lnstitute (API), 1220 L
Gurde for thc Anelvsrs of Guy ami Stiffleg Derricks, 1974 srreet. NW, W a s hi ngton , DC 20005-4070
Madsen, J , 1941, "Repon of Crane Grder Tests," /ron Welded Strucrures." Transactions, Vol. 74, Pan 3
(AIST), 186 Thorn H!l Aoad, Warrendale, PA 15086 Bjnrhovde. R., Galambos, T. V., and Ravindr e. M K.,
ANSI/ABMA 91990 (R2000), Load Aat1ng and Fatique Fisher, J. W., Galam b os, T V., Kulak, G. L., and
ANSI/ABMA 11-1990 (R1999), Load Rat1ng r1nd Fatigue Cr1tem1 for Connec1ors," Journal of the Srrucrural
Industrial and Mili Granes and Other Material Resistancc Factor Des1gn for Steel," Journal of the
1
Structural Divis,on, Vol. 104, No. ST9
Handling Eqwpment
Yura, J. A., Galambos, T. V., and Ravindra, M. K., 1978,
Publisher: American Weldtng Society (AWS). 550 NW
"The Bendmg Resistance of Steel Beams," Journal o(
Le Jeune Aoad, Miami, FL 33126 (www.aws.org)
rhe Structural Divis1on, Vol. 104, No. ST9
1
ANSIINFPA 70-2005, National Electrical Code
Publisher: Amencan Society of Civil Engmeers (ASCE),
ANSI/NFPA 79-2002. Electrical Standard lor Industrial
1801 Alexander Bell Dnve, Reston, VA 20191-4400
Machinery1
(www.asce.org)
Publisher: Notional Fire Protection Association (NFPA),
1 Battery march Park, Oumcy, MA 0 2169 Lyse, l.. and Godlrey, H. J., 1933, "Shearing Propertles
Proceedmgs
APl RP 2A-WSD, 2000, P lann ng , D es 1g ni ng , an d
Constructmg Fixed Dffshore Platforms - Workmg Pvbl1sher: American Society lor Testng and Matenals
!O
""""""...-1.....-
p,.- .. 1
11& ....
. .-..- ME
-,oC.IIU>llf[)lll<flllEl.01900111
.................. _. ,
.
""'-l>uolollN\\=1'GMI
ASME BTH-1-2011
Box G700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959 Avallone, E A., and Baumcrster, T., eds., 1987, Marks'
Runnlng & U n d e r Running Single Girder Electric Boresi, A. P., and Sidebottom. O.M., 1985, Advanced
Traveling Granes Utilizing Under Running Trolley Mechanics of Materiais, 4th edmo n, John Wiley &
Publisher: Deutsches Instnut fr Normung, e. V. {DJN) 2nd edincn, John Wiley & Sons, lnc., New York, NY
rercecccc Gantilevered Grane Booms Pllkev. W D.. 2008, Peterson's Stress Concentration
Publisher: Soctetv of Automot1ve Engineers (SAE Factors, 3rd e drnon, John Wiley & Sons. lnc., New
PA 15096-0001
Shrqlav, J . E., and Mischke, C R., 2001, Mechan,ca/
29 CFR 1910.179, Overhead and Gantry Granes Tolben. R. N., 1970, "A Photoelastic lnvestigation of Lug
Publlsher: Supenntendent of Documents, U.S. Stresses and Failures," Master's Thesrs, Vanderbilt
Publisher: Wire Rope Technical Board (WRTB), 801 N Young, W. C., and Sudynas, R. G., 2002, Roark's
Fairfax Street, Alexandna. VA 22314-1757 Formulas for Stress and Strem, 7th edition,
11
Ca"""""\ A!iME
.,
...,, 4 IH$
_ _.._,
"'""'-al
-
....... ... ....
, ,
s.lOH>.cMlR,u.o,no,u
Nol ... R..
. )[llll>fll2202..l<G"1
I\SME OTH-1-2011
Chapter 2
Lifter Classifications
consideration.
2-1.l Se\ection
component 1emperature of each part of the lifter must
cnteria) and Servrcc ass {fatigue life criterm described en v i r onm e n t cutstde the limits defined in para. 1-4.7.
-'m secnons 2-2 and 2-3 shol e ased en the opernting Thc effects of dust, moisture, and corrosive atmnsphenc
Dcscqn Category and Service Class speci he d far a 2-2 DESIGN CATEGORY
The Design Category and Serv.ce Class sha!! be a li1ng device to be used above its rated load under
marked on the t and appear on _9ll__<Jtati(gis, any c i r c um s t a n c e s other t han for load testing n
l
rawmgs. and documentation assodated wuh the lifter. accordance wi th ASME 830.20 or other aoplicable sa fetv
standards or re gulat1ons.
Class. Typ1cally, documents that require the indicated (a) Design Category A shou!d be des1gnated when
markmgs may mctuce top level drawings, quotauons. the m agn1tude a nd wmatmn of !oads a pphed to the t
lif er
A!l lifter components are assumed to operare withtn (e) The nomina! des1 fa ctor for Des g i n Category A
----- -- _
...,, '""'
the temperature range defmed in para. 1--4.7 and normal sha!I be in accord,:mce with para, 3 1 .3 .
moisture, and ccrrosive environments). Lifter Commentar y : The design fac tor s pe c ilie d in
ccmponenrs operating at temperntures outside the range Chapter 3 for De sign C at e g or y A lifte r s is b a se d on
12
supervisor and experienced crane ocerercr. This Design Table C21 Service Class Life
10 o o l
,
above. Practicaf constcerations of vertous work
o l l 2
,
environments indrcate that the high numbers of load
100 2 J J
commonly equate to usage cond1t1ons under whch tho
200 2 J
design factor ol Design Categor.v A is mapprcpriate. ,
300 J '
Thus, the use of Deerpn Categofy A IS resfr1cted to liing
750
, '
devrce appllcatlons wtth low numbars of load cycles , ' ' ' '
1.000 J
'
(Servlce Class O)
(a) Design Catcgory B s.hould be designated when However, the Design Category B design factor does not
defmed
(b) TI1e nominal design factor for Design Category B 23 SERVICE CLASS
presumpnons (compared to Design Category A) of a stress range v.ilues for structural members (section 3---4)
greater uncertainly in the werqht of the load being and des1gn parameters for mechnnical componentl'
wtuch will result in higher impact loads, and a Commentary: Des1gn lor fatigue involves an eco
maximum rmpact mulnpfier of 100%. These load nom1c dec1sion batween des1red lifc and cost. The rntent
condiuons are characmristic of use of the lifter in work is to provide the owner with the opportunity for more
environments where the weights of the loads being economical designs for the cases where duty serv1ce ts
handled may not be well known and the lifting less severe. A choice of five Service Classes is provided.
operations are conducted in a more rapid, production The load cycle ranges shown in Ta ble 2 1 are consisten!
orterued manner. Typicat charactertsrlcs of the with the requrements of ANSI/AWS 014.1.
appllcatlon for this Design Catagory rnclude rough Table C21 has been ncluded to assist in determinrng
usage and lihs In adverse, tess controlled conditions. the required Service C!ass based on load cycles per day
Design Category B wll generally be appropriate for and service life desired.
- 13
""""ll"'I\Sj,\t ..... -
"'-""IHS- --SMf
"'-'" .--...,,,_. ..... _..._,, ... I
H S
.&oldoo c11101ND1JSm1u.1""""
,..... r..r N, ....ll'lllVII 12 '"-" '"'T
ASME BlH-l-2011
Chapter 3
Structural Design
This chapter sets forth design entena for pnsrnafic (a) Desrgn factors for Design Carogory A liftmg
structurnl members and connecnons of l below-the devlces shall be not less than 2.00 far hmit states of
hook lifting dcvrce y1eldmg or buckling and 2.40 fer lirrut seates of fracture
analysis methad.
m e c han i cal components of a b e l ow- t h e -ho o k l i fti ng far different types o! s tr u ctural members and
device are to be desrqneu for the forces tmposed by the connect1ons have been determined in an extens1ve
lifted load (a value normally equal to the rated load), the research program sponsored by thc American lran and
weiqhts ol the device's oans, and any forces, sucn es Steel lnstitute (AISI) and pubhshed m a ser,es of p<1pers
grlpping or lateral forces, that result from the rvncuon in the September 1978 1ssue (Vol 104, No ST9) of the
of the de vic e . The mc lu smn of lateral forces in ths Journal of the Structural D,v,sion of the Ame r ican
pa r agrap h rs i n t e nde d to r ef e r to c a lc u l n ted lateral Society of Civil Engmeers. Maximum values of VR equal
forces that occur as a resull of the intended or expected to 0.151 for strength limits of yielding or buckling and
use of the Jlftor. This provision is not intended to require 0.180 for strength limits of fracture and for connection
the use of an arbitrary lateral load in lifter design. For design were taken lrom this research and used far
not required. Thrs rssue is discussed further in The term V5 rs the coefficient of variation of the
Commentanes for paras. 3-1.3 and 35.1. spectrum of loads to which the lifter may be subjected.
device shall be based on the allowable stresses dehned Des1gn Category A lihers are considered to be u sed at
m sectlons 3-2 and 3..J. The mimmum va!ues of the relatively high percentages of the1r rnted loads. Due to
nom in a l des.gn factor, N,, m the a! lo wab l e stress the !evel of planning generally associated with the use
equations shall be as fo!lows of these lifters, the llkelihood of liftng a load greater
= 3.0Q for Design Category B lifters loadmg s not )ikely to exceed 5%. The distribution of
14
-
c.a-,,...... SMs.....,_
80 40 50
75
'
50
90
100 ",. 8
'
10;
"
o 25 20
o
io .,
10 17
20 20 " o 25
30 7 " )O
2
ec "
'
50 50 "
60 '
6
70
'
80 3
lifted loads rerauve to rated load is considered to be as
90 2
shown in Table C31.
100
A similar drstributicn was developed lar dynamic
to the derrick was measured. Typical dynam,c loads or b uckllng and 2 40 fer IJmits of fracture and for
were on the arder of 20% of the lifted load and the cormecncn desi g nare calculated using eq. (C3-1).
upper bound dvnarmc load was about 50% of the lifted Prior to the first issuance of ASME 830 20 in 1986,
load. Tests on overhead cranes (Madsen, 19411 showed engineers in construcuon cornmonly designad lifting
somewhat less severe dvnarmc loading. GJVen these devices using AISC allowable stresses and perhaps an
published data and experience-based judgments, a load impact factor tvprcallv not greater than 25% of the litted
spectrum was e st a blish e d far dy n a rn ic loading load The AISC spuclhcarton provrdes nominal design
(Table C32). factors of 1.67 fer y,elding and buckl1ng and 2.00 far
A second d ynam ic load specr-um was d eve lop e d fracture and connectio n s. Thus, the prior design
for a s p e c i al case of Desrqn Cat e g o r y A. S o rn e method, wh1ch is generally recogn,zed as acceptable fer
ma nu fac tu r ers of heavy aqurprne nt s uc h as power lifters now classifted as Design Category A, provided
g e ne r ati o n ma chin e r y build lifters to be used for the design lactors wlth respect to the rated load of 1.67 to
han dl tng ol their equipment. As such, the li ft e r s are 2.08 far member design and 2.00 to 2.50 far connection
used at ornear 100% of rated load far every lift, but due design. The agreement of the computed BTH design
to the nature of those lifts, the dynarnic lo a din g can factors with the pnor practice was felt to validate the
normal Design Category A lifters. The distribution A similar process was co n ducted far D esign
developed ior this special case is shown in Table C3-2. Category 8. In this application, lifters are expected to
The range of total loads was developed by computing serve reliably under rnore severe cond1tmns, includmg
the total load (static plus dynamlc) for the combinatrcn abuse, and may be used to lift a broader range o1 loads.
of the spectra shown in Tables C3-1 and C3-2 'rhe Thus, the ran g e of both static and d y namtc loads is
app ro pr i at e s t a tis l i ca l analysis yie l ded load i ng greater fer Design Category B !han fer Des1gn Category
coefhcients of variation of O. 156 far the standard des1gn A. The BTH Committee developed a set of static and
snectrorn and O 131 for the spemal case. d y namic load spt1ctra based on the judgment and
The las! term ln eq (C 3- 1) to be established is the experience of the Commttee members. Table C3-3 is
re!iabillty mdex, /3. The Com rnl ttee notad t h at the the sratic load spec t ru m ; T able C3-4 is the. dynamic
basad on a value of f3 = 3. Thts value was adopted far A ga1 n , the total load spectrum was deve!oped and
Design Category A. Using the va!ues thus established, the statisttcal anal y sis performed. The coefficient of
design factors (rounded off) of 2.00 fer Jimits of yielding variation far !he loadmg was found to be 0.392
15
"""I\SME ..,,,,
_
Duc to the greater uncunamtv of the loading that are higher !han wou(d be compu1ed using thc
conditions associated wrth Design Category B, thr. conventional bending stress formulas. As with stra1gh1
Committee elected to use a higher vaue of the raliability beam bending theory, the derivatiori of the equations by
mdex. The value of 3 usad lar Design Category A was which the bending s1rasses of a curved beam may be
incraased by 10% far Deslgn Category B (/J = 3.3) computad are basad on the fundamental assumption
Using these values, eq (C3-1) rs used to compute that plane sectlons remain plane (Young and Budynas.
and buckllng anu 3.40 far limits of fracture and for This stress disuibution ex1sts in the elastic ranga only.
connection desrqn In arder to maintain the same Members that are ol such proportions and matenal
relationshio betwean member and connection de srqn properties that allow deve!opmant al a plastic moment
factors for both Design Carecortes. the connect!on will have tha same maximum bending strength (u::.,
des1gn factor is spacified as 3.00 x 1.20 = 3.60. plast1c moment) as a streight member (McWhonar et
Uhers usad in the industrial applications of !he typas al., 1971; Boresi and S,debottom, 1985). Thus, thc peak
for which Design Category B is appropnate have bending stresses due to the curvature must be
traditionally been proponioned using a design factor ol evaJuated lor members subject to cyclic loading and far
3, as has becn requirad by ASME 830.20 smce its which the fatigue lile mus! be assessed. but need no\
inception. As wnh the Dasign Category A design factor, be considerad for static. strength deslgn lor membert in
this agraement betwaen tne oeerco lactar calculated on which the plastic momant can be attalned.
C3-4 and the design factor that has baen successfully Formulas for Stress and Stroin (Young and Budynas,
and ccnnecucn design factors musr be provided. stipu!.itcd in para. 3-1.2 do not e.xceed the allow.ible
The design tactors specred in para. 3-1.3 are stated stresscs and stress ranges specifled in sections 3-2, 3-J,
to be mlnrmum verues. Sorne lifter aoollcencns may and 3-4. The al!owable stressesspecilied in these sectwns
result in graater dynamic loadlng that wilf necessuate do no! apply to peak stresses m regions of connections,
h i g h e r design factors. lt Is the respc nsibihtv of a provided the reguirements of section ,?,-4 are satisfied.
factors are requlred and to determine the approprata Commentary. The allowable stresses and stress
values )n such cases ranges deflned in sections 3-2, 33, and 3-4 are to be
exceed the values g1ven in sectrons 3-2 and 33 and the be less than the specified allowab!e stresses.
.The design of curved members that are subjected to terms compact section" and "noncompact section. A
bending in the p!anc of the curve shall account for the compact section is capable of developmg a fully plasuc
mcrease in maxrmum bending stress due to the stress distribution befare the onset of local buckling in
Toe stress increase due to member curvature need not noncompact saction is capable of developing the yield
be considerad for flexura! members that can develop stress in its compresslon elements befare local buckling
the full plastic moment when evaluatmg stat1c strength. occurs, but cannot res1st inelastic local buckling at the
Commentary: Curved members subject to bending width-thickness ratios al their compression elements.
exhibit stressas on the 1ns1de lconcave sida) of the curve The appropriate l1m11s for various compression
16
"5ME.,uo.-ol
._.._c,JOINOUSTU. Oll>SOI"'
...- .. MS..-0<0"'-1,Sr,r,;
No,.,....,_, "' ,.._..,, ....,..... _, ......
.
- IHS "''"' ..... )tl131ll'I >?l.><,....
ASME BTH-1-2011
elements common to smrcture! members are given in to 0.50Fy, as is commonly used in structural design
Table 3-1. Compression elements that are more slender specif1cations 10day (e.g., A!SC. 1974; AISTTechn 1ca)
man is permitted for noncornpact shapes may fml by Repon No. 6; CMAA #70; SAE J1078). The slenderness
local buckling at stress revats below the yleld stress ratio equal to Ce defines the bordar botween elastic and
and 3-2.6, last paragraph, for comments on slender As Is the practice In the a bo v e -c i te d standards, the
The allowable !ensile stress, F,, shall not exceed the very short compresston members rs justifled by the
value given by cq (3-1) on the gross area nor the value lnsensjtivrtv of such members to the hendmq that may
F" = specihed mnimum ultimate !ensile strength covernge of the tapie can be found in Galambos (1998).
Refer to para 3-3.3 for pinncd connecnon design 3-2.3 Flexura[ Members
requirements.
32.3.1 Strong Axis Bending ol Compact Sections.
32.2 Compression Members Thc allowable bendmg stress, Fb, for membcrs wrth
N f + 9(Kl/r) _ 3(Kl!rf]
1
"l. 40C, 40C}
fE 0.67E
(3-7)
1 76r, { f.- :!. F ti/A
\ ' I
(3-4)
0.13r.E r;.
1 (38)
.,
. = -----;'-.;/A
When Kl/r exceeds Ce, the allowable nxial compress1ve p
A = cross-sectmnal area
'E
f,=--- (3-5)
A = area of the compression flnnge
l.15NA (Kllrf
d = dcpth of t:he scction
1 = lorsional constan!
where
M, = plastk moment
E = modulus of elasticity
K = effecnve Jength factor based on the degree of = r Z, s 1.5 Fy s. for homogeneous sect1ons
1
the actual unbraced length of the member S, majar axlS sect1on modulus
r = radius of gyration about the axis under Z, = majar axis plastic modulus
conssderation
a ll owa ble axial compression stress are based on !he compact ft.nges and webs as defined by Table 3-1 nnd
assumpton of peak residual compress,ve etresses equal with thc flanges contmuously connected to the webs,
17
OIISME ...,.,.
p,_,..,...,i_ --1\S"'E "" IO.CAID o,cy,n..,Es. OlO!>OIN
........ ..,......... ,_..,..., ..,..... -...
.. ,,_1HE -''Ra.>0=1 22,>""CIM"!
J\SME BTHl-20l1
Thick
ness
o.sGJ[F.,
ments, o utstandln: lcgs of palrs of a ngles in M
p ure ccmpresstcn
Legs o ingle
s a ngte suuts. legs o! do uble a ngle
.. 0.7/fr.
Stems ol lees rJ/1
secnons of i
un tu,m thick ness subject lo benu-
1.12Jf/F, 1 AD,/Eff.
r ng o, co mpression: fla nge cose r ctetes ano b/<
or we ds l
Wcbs m flcxura l compresslon INote {4)) h/1., 3.76./lfy !Noto (S)] 5.70.jfff. /N ote (S)J
press,on
INotc (5))
1.12,A(2.33- N,')
2 lA9JEfr,
NOTES:
F
, ccmpressivc residual stres in flange
(2) I
(Ji} far hybrld beams, use !he yield stress of lhf f(ange f
v1-
18
-
C-A>Mfll<"__,..
-
SoldlO.<:IJOllfDVSTIIIES, 01111
..._ .. IHS..,._.....,,....,Asl,IIS
the allowable bending stress is given by eq. (3-6) for cmy rect,mgular 1n shape, and that hos an are.i not less than
length between pmnts of lateral bracmg. the tens1on fmge. For channels bent about thr. major
center, bent about either the ma1or or minar axis, and For any value. of 4/rT
eq. (3-9). For channcls bent about the strong axis, the
where
allcwable bending stress rs given by eq. (3-17).
w1dth of the compre.ssion f111ge
3 OONJ
(3-10)
= L,/ b
-5 1.00 for beams not braccd agmnst
19
AS .. <-
.._,_.O.SI-IE
-o,1f1s ...... "'" .. CAIOINUUtO<IES. OIOS01511
No\'' AUOl<.:ii> )1)11' :!2.',10 Ql,I
T
N,-"""' ..""'-"""'""-'"_.,......,.,..,IHs
ASMf BlH-1-2011
,.,s;
L./ b
+ 0.20 'f 1.00 fm beams no! braced L.,i 1.9[
-,-- {3-2..1)
1 fy
agninst twist or latera! displaccment of thl'
a riestqn factor of N,1 with respect to cuter ber y1e!ding. nnd squarc bars, and so!id rect,mgular sect1ons bent
l-shape members ancJ r.hannel!: bent ebcut the strong al.mut thc1r wcak nxs, tlw .11lowablc bcnding stress is
3-2.3.3 Strong Axis Bending of Solid Rectangular maximum loads defined m the load spectra upan which
Bars. Toe allowable bending stress for a rectangular the des1gn factors are based The Design Category A
section of depth, d, end thickness, 1, is g1ven as fotlows spectra defme a maximum static load eoual to 105% of
20
e_,.,...., ...,.,-.,
.s.lOIO c,,r,INl)UISTRIU. n11oa
,. 1
1
_ -.o.s ..
.-.. .......
__ ,_, ..,,,>tS "'"" ,,.,.... ,00l/ll11 22"-':t"I IWT
ASME STH-1-2011
f
. !
1ct ,,,
(3-26)
+-F +rsl.O (3-30)
fy/Nn .. ..
!.. Jo, Ji,,"' l O
(3-31)
Sl.0 (3-27)
F.
+F
.
-+ F
.. :. '
(3-28) J
.
(3-33)
FyfNJ + Fb :s 1.0
where
f
J = clear depth of the p!ate parnllel to the applied
f_ -+ r;jf., < 1 O
(3-34)
F. F - .
shear force al the secncn under mvesngarion.
or comer radrus.
fo!Jowmg equauons. Equabon (3-35) apphes to al!
1 = uckness of the plate
members except cylindncal members. Equauon (3-36)
para 3-l.3
(3-36)
expression is based on CMAA 1170, which specifies the ln eqs. (;t--29) through (336),
allowable sbear stress as a tuncnon ol the shear vreld F. = al!owoble axial compn:ssive stress from
stress The shear yield stress is based on the Energy of para 3-2.2
Standard.
following requrremerus Lower values for C111, Cu,z, or C,"Y may be used 1f
(b) Whenf,/f05. 0.15, eq. (3-31) is perrrutted m lieu of Commentary: The deslgn of members subject to
eqs. (3-29) nnd (3-30). c ombi n ed axial c o m pressi o n and bc n dmg must
2J
from AISC {1989) with rnodicaticns as necessarv to sle n der compression elemeets. Therefore, provrstons
(1998).
The interaction formulas far cylindrical members rec 3-3 CONNECTION DESIGN
point. Equations (3-32). (3-33), and (3-34) are based on In connection design, bo!L sh11!l not be considered os
the assu m p t i on th at Cm, F,'. and F have rhe same sharmg .tress in rombmation w1lh wPlds. Whcn the
values far both axes. lf different values are applicable, v1ty axes of connectmg, axmlly stressecl mcmber1, dn
d if f e r e nt i n t e r ac t i on aquarions rnust be used (e.g., nol mtcrsecl a! onc' point, provision sha!J bt! made for
connectlon.
stress f., computed wlth eq (3-37) does not exceed the l.flFw
Tr:-- (3-38)
allownble stress F., delinee! in thr- equanon 1.20N,1
.
.
lenglh (N/mm) nn rollers is
wherc
(3-39)
t; = atlowablc crlhcal stress duet o combined shear
C omm e n tar y : Equatiun (3 - 37) is the E n e r g y of = 30.2 if d > 635 mm when usmb SI unit, (F., MPa)
d i vi d e d by tbe app l i c a bl e des ign factor, Nr1 For t he 13 when usmg U S. Customary un1ts (F, ksi)
f =
pUrpose of ttus reqwrnrnent, me cnrecnonc x and y are 9U when usm; SI umts (F. MJ>a)
=
mutually perpendicular orientatlons of normal stresses, lower yleld stress of th<' p11rts m cont.ict
F, =
not x-axis and y-axts bending stresses
Toe wldth-ttnckness ratios of compression elements primary changes are in the levels of allowable stresses
shall be tess than or equal to the val ues g1ven in Table3-1 that have been established to provide design factors of
compresslon elements shall provrde a design factor wilh The allowable baarlng stress defined by cq. (3-38) is
respect to the limit state of buck!ing not less than the based on AISC 1 1989) and AISC (2 000). A ower
l
thl c k ne ss ratios are defined for compact and no n (193 4). As u sed throughout this S t a ndard , the terms
comcect sections in Tabl e 3 - 1. The {rmus expressed mi!led surface, mi/led, an d milling are inte n ded to
therein are based on Table 85.1 of AJSC (2000). Dem mc lude surfaces that h av e been a ccurately sawed or
tions of the dlmensrons used in Table 3-1 lor the most finished to a true p a l ne by any su itable means
22
c-A&M.:...,.-
.......... ..,l'<S ...,..f
..., .. c,,,c,..ouST10u 01no1u
"" .
....... -.._..... ................. .._........... ........ ..... .l<J,31>'1'22:lo2.10"''
ASME BTH-1-2011
I ' + 1
'
' 1 'I
+'
1 '
t,
r
h,:
'
h - ------- b
'
h,
b
,____
I '
+ 1
t.
------- b
"
'
parts of the hfter and the itern being handled must be The actual shear stress,fv, shall be based on the gross
evaluatec by a qualified person taking into account the area of the bolt if the shear plane passcs through the
nature ol the item and its practica! sens1tivity 10 local bolt shank, or the roo! area if the shear plane passes
compressive stress through the threaded length of the bolt and the bolt
3-3:2 Botted Connections The allowable. bearing stress, F1,, of the connected p;irt
block shear.
stress aree of the bolt and the bolt tensmn due to the
The allowable !ensile stress, F,', for a bolt subected
applied loads as defined in para 3-1.2. to combined tension and shcar stresses is
The allowable shear stress, Fv, of th bol! is
0.62.f,
(3-41) F,' = jr - 2.60f (3-43)
r. = 1.20N
23
c_,.-.s..e ...... -1
-,a.CAIOINDIISTAIU O!flOJ
"' .. -.>l)ll/:l,tl
................. .-.. ...... ,..i-- ....
r,,..-.,..,JHS--"'"""t,11[
72.:tl< GM!
ASMf OTIH-2011
The allnwahle shcar capacny, P. of a bol! m n s!ip Fig. C3-2 Block Shear
7
>' D,,ec11on ol
(:1-41) co11nec1Jon
i load
whcrc
dctermincd by testin;.
durm; mstnllntion to provide an mltlal tcoson equal to oieces other than to require that the strength o thi:,
by
_ menns of dowels, keys, or othcr close-fit elements.
resistance, 1s dependen1 on !hll' installation tenston of
fastener is used is ccosrdereo a pinned connection ano holcs are more than 1/1& in (2 mrn) greater than the tiolts
Allowable stresses or aUowable 1oads in bolts are necessary, the test resutts reoorted in Kulak et al. !1987)
estabhshed as the ulumate tensile strength, the ul11mate can be used to determine the reduced capacity of the
appropriate design factor. The ultimate shear strongth is The slip resistance defined in this Standard i
s basad
taken as 62% of the uhimate tensile strength (Kulak et on faylng surfaces that are free of loose mili scale, paint,
al., 1987). TI1is value is reasonable for relatively compact and other coatings. The slip resistance of painted or
bohed conneclions. lf the length of e bolted connection coated surfaces vanes greatly, depending on the type
exceeds aboul 15 in. (380 mm), the allowable shear per and thickness of coating. lt is not practica! to define a
bolt should be reduced to account for the increaslng general acceptable slip resis1ance for such connections.
inefficiency of the connection [Kulak et al., 1987). Testing to determine !he slip resistance is required for
Equation (3-43) is derived from Kulak et al. (1987), slip-res1stant connections in which the faying surfaces
ec. (4-1). Actual stresees dueto applied loads are to be are painted or otherwise coated (Yura and Frank, 1985).
cornputed basad on tho bolt's gross area, root area, or Toe design provis1ons for slip-critical connections are
tensile stress area, as applicable. based on experimental resoarch (Kulak et al., 1987) on
The configuration of bolted connections in lifllng connections made with ASTM A325 and A490 bohs.
dcvices wlll likely vary greatly from the standard types In the absence of similar research results using other
of connections used in s1eet construction. This Standard types and grades of botts, para. 3-3.2 timits the types of
does not auompt to address the many variances wi!h bolts that mav be used in slip-critical connections to
respect 10 evaluating the strength of the connecled ASTM A325 and A490.
24
..._.,.e ,.._
c..o.,,ohl
---.,.un1,,u,.a..1
ASME BTH-1-2011
Commentary: A pinned connection is defmed for of thc plate in the drrectrcn of the apphed load
ccnnecncn in which two or more parts are )oined Toe allowable double plane shear strength beyond
together m such a manner as to a!low relativa rotanon thc pinhole P is
of a pm-connectcd plate in the regt0n of the pinhole A,, = total area of the two shcar planes beyond the
(3-52)
r.,
(J-45)
l', = C, 1.20N/lb,JJ
where
reton of the pmho)e in any al four modes. These are
b,0 = effecuve wrdth to each sde of the pinhole
tansion on the effective area on a p l a n e through the
D, = pin diame!er The strength equahons for the plates are emp1ncal,
b, = actual wrdth of a pin-connected plate between 1970) a nd a bout 70% far T-l steeJ {Bi bber et al., 1952).
the edge of the hale and the edge of the plate Toe u tl imate shear s\ rength is taken as 70% ol the ulti
The width lnnit al eq. (3--47) does nol apply to plates h a le that is pe r p endicula r to the l i n e oi action of the
that are stfened ar ctherwise prevented from buckhng ap pl1ed load N ote that the term in brackets 111 eq. (3-5 1)
out of plane. is the length o one she ar p lana. lf the edge ol the p late
The allowable. single plane fracture strcngth beyond is curved, a s illustrated in F ig. C3-3, the !o ss ol shear
P=
F._[
C,UON..ll.13
( J
R - T +
0.92b,
+b,/D,
} (3-49)
defined by the lme of actlon of the apphed oad,
l then
25
c-...-1n--..1
..,_,.._,s_._..,_...,.,.E 4""' I0-""'0 OIIOU!H>IIEI.. om10III
Fig. C3-3 Pin-Connected Plate Notation Fig. C34 Stiffened Plate Llfting Beam
Curved edge
Z'
r .'
'
. '
.
'
<
.
'
.
/
r
'
',
.
.
R
Stilleners pravent
o,. CL hole
out-ol-plane bucklmg
.,
3-3.3.3 Fatigue Loading. Thc flVerage tens!le stress
on the net area through the pinhole shall not exceed the
o,,
Jimits defined in p;mi. 3-4.3 for Stress Catcgory E.
Pin connected plates may be des.qned with doubler as ANSI/AWS 0 1 4 . 1 . but mcludes p1nned c:onnected
mcthods commonly used in precuce to determine the pinned connec:t1ons as Stress Categary E for fatigue
method, the strength of each plate is ccmputed and the Pinholes 1n liftmg dev1c:es used in construction
values summed to arrive at the total strength of 01e {Servic:e Class OJ are at times flame cut. Experierice
detail. In the second method, the toad is assumed to be shows that this is acceptable prac:tice for devices not
sharnd arnong the individual plates in proportion to subect to cydic: !oadmg. Connections in dev1ces
their rtucknesses (i.e., uniform bearing between the pin des1gned for Service Classes 1 through 4 shall be
and me plates ts assumed). The method to be used for machmed as required !U avoid the notches thal result
33.3.2 Combined Stresses. lf n pmhole is locatcd pin. shall not exceed the value given by eq. {3-53), where
al a point where signficant stresses are induced from Fy is the y1eld stress of the pm or plate, whichever is
membcr be.havior such as tensin or bending, local smaller. The bcaring stress between the p1n and the plate
stresses from the function as a pmned connedion shall in connectmns that will rotate under load for a !arge
be combined with the gross membcr stresses in accor number of cydes (Serv1ce Class 1 or higher) shall not
dance with paras. 3-2.4 and 3-2.5. exceed !he value given by eg. (3-54).
l.ZSFy
Commentary: lf a pinhole is located a t a point
F , : -;;- (3-53)
F1g. C3-4
Bending of the lifting beam produces tension at the Commentary: The bearing stress limitat1on serves
top of the plata. The vertical load in the pmhote to control deformation and wear of the plates. 11 1s nota
produces shear stresses above the ho!e. The critica! strength llmit. The allowable bearing stress given by
stress in this region is due re the combination of these eq (3-53) is based on the requ1rement o! CMAA lf70.
shear and tensite stresses. The allowable boaring stress for connections that will
26
...S,,,f .._
,.._ .... a_,,...,., __
$old<oC.,.,[IIIIOIJSTI\LE$ 0..00190
.......... .,.llll{ll;S..-. ,
1
"", ....-..-.... _...,_ ....... .... ""- - ..s
ASME BTH-1-2011
rotare under load fer a large nurnber of cvctes This is the bas1s for"the allowable stresses for welds
[eq. (3-54)) is 50% of the P.Q. (3-53) allowable bearing in AISC (2000) and ,ANSI/AWS 014.1, and for the
connec1ions wfth large pin-to-hale clearances is be equal lo the effective area of the weld multiplied by
Pmned connections that must accommodate large the base metnl shall not exceed the limits defmed m
angles of rotation under load or that will relate under ;,ection 3-2.
the assurnpnon of lo11ding 10 the pin shall be conststont effective throat thickness.' lnterm1ttent groove welds are
the main (center) plata and the doubler plates. The effedive throatthickness is thc mnimum distance
from the root of the groove to the face of the weld, less
The !oWer bound shear strength of depositad weld For Y-groovcs from 45 deg to 60 deg, the effective throat
metal is 60% al the tensile strength (Fisher et al .. 1978) thickness is !he dcpth of groove less \ in. (3 mm).
27
c.-, - ..
..._ """' -"'....,, uo'" c""o IHIJUS!IIIEI<. o,m,11
No_ .-,.......,......,_., ... -... ..,....., ._ltlS "" .. "'ol,.7111lllfll 22"Ua< <1''1
ASME BTH-1-2011
Table 3-2 Mnimum Effective Throat Thickness of Table 3-3 Minimum Slzes of Fillet Welds
Ovl.'r '!
. (6) to 1/ (13) }, (5)
te Y
, (61 Y
a C3l 1
;. (16)
1
Over 6 (150)
complete-oinl-penetrntion welds
3-J.,I.) Fillet Welds. Pillet weld size is speced by (3B mm) 1.ntermittent we!d. shall be made on both sides
leg width, but stress is detennmed by effective thrmlt of the jomt far at least 25% of Jts length. The maximum
the shnrtest distance from thc root to the fnce of the wcld.
ln lap joints, thc mrn1mum amount of l11p sholl be five
In general, ths e.ffective throat uuckness ts considcred to
t1m the thickness of the thmner part omed, bul not
be on a 45-deg angle from the leg and have a dlmension
less than 1 in. (25 mm). Where lap jomts occur lI1 plntr;:s
equal te, 0.707 tmes the Jeg wrdth. The effecnve wcld
or bars tha\ are subect to 11x1al stress, both lapped parts
areo of a fillet weld is defmed as the effecttve le11gth of
sh11ll be welded along thc1r ends
we!d mulnpbed by the effective throat tluckness.
Fillet welds shaH nol be used in skewed T-omts that
The eecnve !ength of a fillet weld shall be the overa!!
have an induded angle of less than 60 dcg or more
length of the full-s,ze fil!et induding end retums. When
than 135 deg. The edge of the abutting member shal!
ever possible, a fillet weld shall be termmated with end
be beveled, when necessary, to Jimit the root opening
retums. The mnimum length o end returns shall be
to Y in (3 mm) milumum
two times the weld size. These retums shall be in the
Fillet welds in holes or slots may be used to transmit
same planeas the rest o the weld.
she.ir in lap oints or to prevent the buckhng or
The mmimum effective length of a filie! weld shall
separation of lappcd parts and to JOin components of
be four times the specified weld size, et the weld size
bui\t-up members. Fillet welds in ho!es or slots are no!
'shall be consrdered not to exceed nne-Iourth of the
to be considered plug or slot we!ds.
0
effective weld arca shall .not exceed the cross-sectional buckling of lapped parts and to JOi.n componen\ parts
The mmimum fillet weld size shall not be less than and slot welds shall be considered as the nominal cross
the s12e requ1red to transmil calculated forces nor the sect1onal are.a of the hale or slot in the plan e of the faymg
size givcn lI1 Table 3--3. These tabu!ated sizes do not surfoce.
28
"'"' ,i.
, ..
. :201S(Jll l 1l'.S:'.,. G.M'i
"'"'-""""'_...., ..,-- ............ ..,,,>JS
ASME BTli-1-2011
Servrce Class
Stress Clegory
E' H, (ll O
) 9 (60) 6 (40) 3 (20)
'
NOTE:
(!) Flexura! stress range of 12 ksr (80 MPa) permllted al thc toe of stJnener welds on flanges.
The diameter of the hole for a plug weld shall not be 3.1.2 Ufter Ctasslfications
than the thrckness of !he part containing il, cxcept for where
those ends that extend to the edge of the part. The N = equivalent number of constant amplltude
nummum spacmg o !ines of slot we!ds in il dircctlon cycles at stress rnnge SRrr_
transverse to their length shall be four nmes the width 111 = number of cycles for the 11h port"ion of a van
of the s!ot The mnimum center-te-cenrer spacmg in a able amplitude Joading spectrnm
longitud mal drec!in on any lme shall be two times the 511, = stress range for the th portien of a variable
When applying the fatigue design provisions defined which service stresses for the maximum loading (stat1c
in U,1s secnon, calculated stresses shall be based upon plus 1mpact) were comparad to !he allowable ranges in
elastic analysis and stresses shall not be amplified by Ta ble 3-4 would be excessively cservative.
stress c o nc entration factors for geometrical A nalyses have been performed as part of the
Commentary: The fatigue design requirements in computed for the load spectrn drscusssd in
this section are d erived from AISC (2000) and Commentary for para 37.3 using eq. {356). The rcsu!ts
AIST Technical Report No. 6 and are appropnate for the showed that the calculated lile durations due to these
types of stee uoon which the provismns of Chapter 3 spectra are s!!ghtly greater than the resultsthat are
are based The use of other ma t erials may r equrre a obtained by cornparmg service stresses d u e t o rated
different means of evaluannq the fatigue lile of the lifler. load static loads to the allowable stress ranges given !n
29
o.o_,
r_ .\SMt
ffl-
"'-
--ASME s... "'c"'o lt"OJS111lU 010110
Tablo 34 Thus, assessmen! of the fatigue life of a lifler o therr muumum tensilc strcngth, then all tension sha!I
may normally be performcd using only stauc stresses be assumed to be carried exclusrvely by thc tasteucrs
The fatigue lile of a Hhmg oevice that wiU be used in Commentary; The provisions of pera. 3-ll.5 are
a manner such tha! the standard load spectra are not taken from Appendix K3.4 of A!SC 12000). The valtJes for
representative of the expected load1ng can be evaluated use in eq. (357) are also shown in loble 3-5
Report No. 6.
3-4,6 Cumulative Fatigue Analysis
Parameters is taken from A!SC (2000). The jomt ceteus (e) for Stress C;itegory C" wtlen stresses are lI1 ksi,
to lifting devicc inspectors. (d) for Stress Category C" when stresses are m MPa,
O.JO+ 1.24()
34.5 Tensile Fatigue in lhreaded Fasteners
R = f?.,ll'I 'E l O
,
.
subjected to tensile fatigue loading shal\ be designed so Use the requiremcnts for Stress Category C if R = 1.0,
due to the combmed applied load and prymg forces 21l = length of the nonwelded root face in the
do not exceed the design stress range computed using dJtection of the thickness of the tension
eq. (3-57). The factor, C, shall be taken as 3.9 x 108. The loc1ded pinte
threshold stress. FrH, shall be taken as 7 ksr (48 MPa). C = constan t from Table 3-5 for the Stress
analysis of the relative stiffness of the connected parts C" when stresses are in MPa
and fasteners shall be penmtted to determine the tensile er =- 0.167 for Stress Category F
stress range m the fasteners due to the cyclic loads : 0.333 for ali Stress Categories except F
Allemately, the stress range in the fasteners shall be F" allowable stress range for the detail under
assumed to be egual 10 the stress on the net tensile area consideration. Stress range is the algebra1c
due to 20% of the absolute value o the desrgn !ensile difference between the m;;iximum stress and
load. If the fasteners are not pretensioned to at leas! 70% the mmimum stress.
30
.... .,..- .. --
eo,,,,,,,,,11.l<ME.,_
p_.,.,..,.,.._-.-AllME
... -........ ...,. ........""'""""'Rrl!'.'"'""
N.... l<......,.l!/:111' 2'[;0l140Ml
ASME BTHl-'2011
F711 threshold value for F., as g1ven in 1able 3-5 specrra in whrch peak rmpact loads are egua! tn 50% of
N = desired desrgn fatigue hfe in cydes of the the maximum lifted load for Design Category A lifters.
detail bemg evaluated N i s the expected and 100% of the maximum lifted load for Design
number of constan! amplitude stress range Category B lifters. ln the event that lifter 15 expected
cycles and b to be provided by the owner. lf to be subccted to 1mpact Jodmg gre11ter than these
no desired fatigue life is specifled, a qualifted values, quJified person shall mdude an additional
person should use the threshold values, Frn, impactfactor to account for such loads.
cumulative damage annlysis of n vnrymg Commentary: The design req uirements defmed in
amptude load spectrum, an equivalen! this 'chap ter are based, in pan, on upper bound vani cal
number of constan! amphtude cydes can be im p a ct fac tors of 50% of the liftod l oad for D e s i gn
calcu!ated using eg. (3-56). Cacegory A a nd 100% for D esign Cacegory B. (Th e loads
q 1.0 when stresses are m ksi u sad for the de v e lo p m ent of this S t a ndard are
Class are selected from a table such as Table 3-4 that Stress concentrat1ons due to ha les, c:ha nges m sechon,
treats the stress range as a step tuncnon. These values or s im i l a r d e t a i ls s h a ll be <1ccountcd for when
are based on the maximum number of cycles for eacn determming peak stresses m load-carrying elements
Ser vice Class and consrder every cycJe to be of lhe subect t o cyclic loading, tmless stated otherwse in this
sama m a g n il ude , as di scuss ed m C o m m e nt ary lor chapter. The. need to use peak stresses, rather than
3-5.3 D eflection
3-5.1 lmpact Factors
The design of below-the-hook liftmg dev.ces does not lt is the responsib1lny of a quaiified person to
nonnally require the use of un rmpact factor. The des.gn determtne when deflection hmits should be applied and
tactors estabhshed in this chapter are based on load to establish the magmtudes of those Jim;tsfor the desgn
31
devices
uncfer load.
32
.,_"31o'E1...,.
"-iOodhlHS--o-.o.SMt
:$l 1<(l'IT
ASME BTttI-Wll
- r,
jJ
/ ;
! -!.
'-"'
t
]
:.
J
t t
i
x
... e
- ' o
N
. '.
; ;; :;; <
u
33
ASME BTH-1-2011
o.
'
3
I
)
>
'
\JL___
l t
t:
;
, ._ I f
_,_ __ _,
'
.e
'
o '
N
-
-
o o
-
s
o
34
c--,.11Sr,,r--..,
... .,....._ .. ..
l'<-d ... lHS ....... ktiloo-,.,;,,E
..,.,5 .... ' ,;o,,.ousm,u, o,0!>07N
MOO "" Fl<.so10.2Q1J/ll11 Z2:2. 1
Gl<T
ASME IITHl-2011
3 L
-e
)'.,,
'
,
o
e
a
'
e:
.,, "
o
-
"'X
X
-
"
w w
o
o
s
o
35
...
.-.SMC BTHl-2011
o
:;;
o
B
:;;
E
e
o E
':'. iD
E s;
o
o
,
' u
" o " "'
'
; '
,
'
a
;
i
'
e,
,
u
e
o
o
r
e
a r '
sf---+--+-+--l
o
;a N
. . o
s e !
e E a
... e
.
,
' '
o . a
o
o
' ,
.
' =
e-
o "
!
o
-s
"e ,-
o
-
e-
o E
.E
'
E
-s 2
o i
>
"' -a
;s
' '5 ! -s E a
. , o ' .
s a E o o o
-
' < o
o
-
o
" ' o
" - o
o
o
a
o o
o a -
s o o
g o
o e '"
e
;
'
- o
E e s >
" '-
o
'
E
s t " s E
;,
e
o
e-
X
e
e-
u u u
o
- -
2
-a-a
o ' '
' e
"
5
"
> >
0 0
ss
o
2 .':Z.
;;
;;
,,
0 0
o o
' N
.....
.. ..._
,.,
36
C_ASME ......-..
-.. .. ... s ASl,O[
!WdloCM>WDIJ5TM'S "'""') ..
:;:
:;
a
E
I o
t
'a
E
s
a
t t
i
o
o
8
'
- E
11-l
Ji1-i
j
x
::: e- u
ID V O W
' u
o;
, o
2 .:!
:S!
o
! ' '
E E
i2
o
'
37.
...
--..-
,,_ ..
,.. , __ -10:c,\ll)MlUST"'6.tH1!,0I ..
- -----
...
--R-.ll>IJnll11:2:t;1 0Gt,!'I
'5M t lllt-H-2011
's
1 .
1 1
E
e,
/ t
,
u
e
"
o
.. e
,,
a
e=
3
1
.
e
x "' '
N
"" u e w e w
'
38
ASME BTfl-1-2011
;;:
:e
:s
1
"
t t o
:,:
<>
>
G\
" ,,
.
:,:
" '
1"'
o \..
- ti. z
t
.!i
E
E
E "
e
::. t- _
a t
o
,, <
;;
;;
"
a
.,
"
;,
lf.
=
" e
."
e.
e
.e
'
"
"
.,, .,, . .
c e
.c -
e
' X
' ' ' X
X
'
., "
"
"
..; "
v e w c w
c w
e
E
a
E 'e
EE
"
E E
E E
e c e
c e
e. e
e.e
39
.._.,.,,.,....
._.,....,
__ _ -C""'IHDUSflllU,DIM01N
..... -.1!U>IJlll,12CltUGMr
No---- ...----"'"
ASMJ:. Bntl-2011
"
]
s
;
a
a
'
E
o
-
'
o
40
ASME BlH-1-2011
Chapter 4
Mehanical Design
of machine elements and thoseparts of a Hftlnq-devrce Sheaves shall be Iabncated of material specified by
not covered by Chapter 3. Chapter 3 is froquently usad the liftmg devrce manufacturer or qualified person
srrength requiromcnts of the framework that jcms the Commentary: This section applies to sneaves that
machine elements together. Mechanical drive systems. are conminad in the envelope of me below-the-hook
machine elements and components, and other uxiharv lilting devrce. Sheaves tb at are part of a separate
equipmem are covered n ttus chapter. bottom block or crane system are not covered by ths
desig:n.
4-1.2 Relation to Chapter 3
Mechanirol components of the lifting devce Ihat are Commentary: The pitch diameter of a sheave has a
Commentary: When failure of a mechantcal the overhead crane's sheave package, spacing, and fleet
component cou!d directly result m the unintended angle between the two p ara ll e l systems ne e d to be
need to be followed when designing a cornponent. using 6 x 37 d<1ss wire rope. or 15 times the w1Te rape
Along wnh the forces produced by normal operation, diame:ter w.hen usmg 6 x 19 dass w1re ropc
irregularities that are common in mechanical systems, Sheave assemb!ies should be des1gned based on a
'-..,;w.,,,.,...,..
.._o<wlH..-...., .. -ASME _,"' CNO l'fl>USrRJU. OIOSOI ..
Out81do ninmeter
Note O) j
Note(11__/
NOTE.
Aope raorus
(1) 'Ai 111 (3 mm) ora distance or % times the mpe dlamet<?r,
wh1ch<?ver 1 smaer.
NOTE.
4-2.5 Lubrication
the wire rope frorn jumping frorn the sheave The guard
Commentary: Lubrication systems. grease llnes,
needs to be placed close to the runn1ng sheave to
self-lubricating bearings, or oil-impregnated bearmgs
ensure that !he wire rope r:annot get jammed or lodged
are ali methods that wi!I ensure !he lubricaton of thc
between the sheave and the guard.
bearings. Particular cate should be taken when
Sheave grooves shall be smooth and free from surface applicaltons tha\ are a whotly attached or 1ntflgral
irregularities that could cause wire rope damage. The component o l a below-the-hook lihing dev1ce.
form a clase-fitting saddle for the size of the wire. rope Wire rope reeved through the liftmg device and the
used, and the sides of the grooves should be tapered hoist shall conform to the rcqu1rements of the hoist.
groove. Flange comers should be rounded, and rims Cornmentary: This sect1on addresses wire rope
should run true around the axis of rotahon requ!fements for the rare application when the ho1st
tapered to allow the wire rope to easily shp into and Wire rope shall be o a rccommended construct1on for
sea! in the shaave ropa groove The Wire Rope Users liftmg servicc The qualif1ed pcrson shall consider other
Manual, 3rd edition, Table 12, previdas 1nformation on foctors (1.e., type of end connection, D/d ratio. sheave
42
::.,,.,v,o11,.,.,_
........... ,.. ._ .._ .-.si,,
,w,j IO C.,,,,O""DIJS!>UE. o,oJU
,.. ........ - .. - -k .....
. ,
_ ..
. Nei '' lltu1 101lllll 1 22.52 " GMT
ASME BTH-1-2011
bearing lrictJon, !'te.) that eect the wrre rope strength Loase chains or belts will experience accelerated wear
to ensure the 5:1 safety factor is maintained. and result 111 prematura failure of the system
the envuooment in whic.h u t<; to be used. Commercial components used in the drive system of
Commental)': Tha Cornmittae left open the use of mtmg speced by the manufacturer is not exceeded
synthe1ic or other nonmetalllc rape for scecet under worst case loadings.
Thewire rope fleet angle lorsheavesshould be limited used in the dcsign of the structural components,
para 4-1.2
4-3.6 Rope Clips
cast jron clips shall not be used For spacing, number of Means for lubncatmg and inspecting drive systems
clips, and torque values, rccr to U1e clip manufacturer"s shall be provided
and live rope restmg in the dip saddle. Chps shall be All motion hazards associated with the operation of
tighlened evenly to the recommended torque After the mechanicnl power trnnsm1ss1on components shall be
initlal load 1 applied to the wae rope, the clip nuts shall eliminated by des1gn of the eqmpment or protection by a
be retightened to the recommended torque to guard, device, s.ife distance, or safe location. All mot1on
compensate far any decrease in wrre rope diarneter hazard guards shall
causcd by the load. (11) preven! entry of hands, fingers, or other parts of
through 4-8 provide specific requirements for other than authoriz.ed persons
mechanical components of a drlve system. (d) not cause any additional hazards, if openings are
flexible transrmssmn devices should heve provisions for person without pemmne.nt deformation, if used as a step
adushnent
Commentary: An adjusrment mechanism. such as sider the ASME 830.20 requ1rement that the operator
a cham or be!t ughtener, is recommended to maintam perform inspections prior to eech use. The guards and
the dastpn tension in flexible nansrmsston devices protective devices need to allow the operator 10 perform
43
c--
..._... OHS
- .-...sw. - .. CAID!IT"1ES, atgJ ..
these maoecncns and not creare edduro ne! hazards method to size g e e r ln g . Based on a review o r a large
when the mspecnons are heing perlormed. ANSI 815.l numbor of gear designs, thc Lewis Equation couptad
provides the basis of these requirements. with the desrqn factm, N., provrces conservative results.
1
Although guards and personnel protective equpment As an atternanve, the qualifie d person can use
are salcty equlpmem, they were mcorporetad into this A N SI /AGM A 2 001 - C95 to p r o v, d e a mo re refmed
design standard. Tne Committee believes these tssues analytical approach where the design parameters of the
need to be addressed in the design phase to ensure thet lilter are more constralned.
The requirement tor rne 200lb (91-kgf person comes Bevel and worm geanng shall be rated by the gcnr
lock-up.
4-5.1 Gear Design
shall specfy the typcs o gcaring. Sphl ge.irs slrnll nol bl' uscd.
The nllowabk- tooth load m bending, Le;, of spur and is us ed, the qualified person needs to provide
(4-1)
45.8 Operator Protection
a cc o rn modat e m ater ial vreld stress and the BTH-1 4-6.1 Bearing Design
A s an altemative to the Lewrs formula tn eq. (4-1), L1u bcaring life for ro!ling element beanngs shall equal
spur and helical ge.irs may be based upon or exceed the values given in Table 4-2 for the lit'ting
Commentary: The Committee declded to provide companies. Toe resulting table was cross referenced to
the Lewis formula to the quallfied person as a simpler CMAA #70 to verily that it does not s,gniflcantly deviate.
20 deg 20 deg
"
16 0.242 0.295 0.361
"
,o 0.283 O 320 0.393
"
30 0.320 0.)58 0.4)7
"
38 0.336 0.383 0 /156
"
50 0.352 O 408 0.471,
GENERAi NOTE. The strength racrcrs above are used 111 tcrmutas wntainmg dtametral pltch. Thes factor5
O 2,SOO
1 10,000
2 20,000
3 J0,000
4 40,000
ft!S---
"- ASM"E ,,,.,. .......
P,-,"' >.SME
'"'' CAll>!JUS1111Es, OIH<llN
Not .. 11Ho1,.20l>lllll :1Z:51,.GMT
............ - ...... _...... ......
. ..,................ _IH$
ASME BTH-1-2011
4-6.S Lubrication
The basir dynamic kmd rntmg C, for a bearmg with Means shall be provided tolubncatebeartngs. 13caring
L bcilrins lifc from Tablc42 is dctcrmined by eqs. (4-3) cnclosures should be desrgned to cxcludc dlrt nnd
10
manuforturcr, lh (N)
lb (N)
S h n ft i n g sha l l be fnbricated ol m a t e na l ha vmg
manufacturar
4-7.2 Shatt Alignment
y dynamic ax1;1I lon d factor per benrmg
Alignment o the shafting to gcarboxes. couplin;s,
manuf-ilcturer
ncnnngs, und otner dnve companents shall mee! or
Commentary: The equatlon for bearing lile l:!xceed th( component manufocturer'!. specif,cnt,ons
4 7 .4 Shaft Details
Sleeve ar journal beanngs shall nol exceed pressure
and velocity ratings as defmed by eqs (4-5) through Shafting, keys, hales, press fits, and lilkts shall bt:
(4-7). The manufacturers' values uf P, V. and PV shall dcs1giied for the forces encountered in actual operatian
followmg values:
46
c.,..,....,,,.SM!;_o_
s..... C,,,,
0 INOUl'f<lES. otMOlll
..._ ..... ..- ...... -.u'l!s
...,,,....,,,..20,w11n-1 cr.rr
........... ...., ..... _.... ...-..-"" ....-JI<"
ASMEBTHl-2011
Table 4-Ja Key Size Versus Shaft Diameter Table 4-4 Fatigue Stress Amplification Factors
(ASME 81 7 .1)
Fatigue Stress
1.030
. '!, :Y,6
1,250
'!, l '/
, '/.
l 't. 1% %,
1Y, 11;, %
11/, 2'/, Y
,
(e) Shaft elements subect to combined ax1J/bendmg
2'!. 2);. '
!.
2\ and shear stresses shall be proportioned such that the
3'!. %
3'/, 31/.i '!, combined stress does not exceed the following volue:
)}', 4'h l
s'h 1 1;.
'h
11, (4-10)
5 'l
i 6'/,
where
Nommal 5haft Dlame1er, mm requirements anrl comes d1recUy from ASME 817.1 and
Nominal K!y
DIN 6885-1.
Over To Sue, mm
8 1 0
3 " ' Only the nomenclature has been modiied to more
ro 4 X '
" 5 X 5
closely follow Chapter 3 of this Standard.
"
ll " 6 , 6
"
JO 8 X 7
"
JO 36 10 X 8
47.6 Shaft Fatigue
38 12 X 8
Shafting subjected to fluctuating stresses such us
"
50 14 X 9
bendmg in rotation or torsion m reversing drives shall
"
50 58 16 X 10
be checkcd for fatigue. This ched: s in addition to the
58 65 18 X ll
20 X 12
statrc checks in pMa 4-75 and need only be performcd
15
"
15 8S 22 X 1A a pmnts of geometrrc discontirunty where stress
ksi (MPa)
axial/bcnding stress,
by W. O Pilkey.
s.
- computed axal stress, kst (MPa)
Commentary: Stress concentration factors need to
s.
- computed bending stress, ksi (MPa)
be conservatively determinad to account far the
S,
- specred
ksi {MPa)
mnimum ultimate tensile strcngth,
Huctuahng stresses resulting from the stopping and
on CMAA #70. .
where
-r =. computed combincd snear stress, ksr (MPa) 47,6.1 Fatigue Stress Amplification Factor. The
,,-
T = computed torslonal shear stress, ksr (MPa) fatigue stress amplification factor, K,.,, based on Service
TV computed transverse shear stress, ksr (MP11) Class shall be setccted from Table 4-4.
c_,.,.....,..
"
,.,_,,.. ..s_...,,.._"""E Sold lo.CAIOINDliS1RIE.S-, 0'910)11
H,u,. Rn ...,1'11llY1t 2i Ol 1
4 <lt,I
T
of componcnts
whcre
ksi (MPa)
48.1 fastener Markings
S = corrected tangue {endurance) lirru! of shaft in
revcrsed bending, ks (MP,1) Al! bolts, nuts, and cap screws shall hnve requrred
clement sha!l nol exceed the fcllowmg values: 4-8.2 Fastener Selection
Kr,1 stress ampllbcaticn fac tor for bcndmg flntt stress s hatl not exceed thc allowablr-stress values
Kn, stress amplificntion fo ctor for direct tcri'>HUl !'!tobli.hcd by ni:-.- (.'--4{1) through (:t-4'.ll and parir. )--4 5
K51, = stress amphhcntmn fac ot r lor tormonnl shear 4-8.5 fastener lnstallation
'T
/ = comp ut ed cum bined fa tigue shear stress.
Fastencrs shall be msta!led by .in <1ccepted mc thod
ksi (MP.i.)
.is detcrmi.ned ly the liftmg drvicc mnufodurer r
o 11
(4-J4)
fastener is 1rnp ortan1 Acceptatile in statlation m ethods
include, but re
a no\ limitad to, turn-ol-the-nut meth od,
(d) Combined tensile and shear fatigue stresses where to rque wrenches, and l
e ectr omc sensors.
S"'
(
s."s,
' " + KrSR ) ' 3( .,-'
.. s,
.+ Ksr-r,.
) 's'K
11 (4-15) Fastenerli for covers, p ane ls , brackets, or othcr
uctuang loads, ksi (MPa) Tlus section sets forth requ1rements for the grip ratm
specrfied mmimum yreld strength, (MPa) for pressure-gnppmg lifters (friction-type) Factors
s, =
ksr
to fluctuatmg
the computed
loads, ksi
shear stress
(MPa)
not due
' - portian
fluctuat.ng
of the computed
"
--
,,,_ .. ...,s ,.,,,.
"I .. R
Ol!IOOIN
bar tongs and vertical axis coil grnbs hove other specal N v = 2 + 2 s i n 0
load hnndling conditions (e.g., opening force) th at O = anglc of vncuurn pad interface surface
JSf
= coefflcrent of startc frcnon
at the rated load. Constderation should be given to con
4-10 VACUUM UFTING DEVICE DESIGN operator durmg use .ind sha11 continue to funct1on
detennined bJ eq (4-18)
to be lifted
(11) The liftlng device m anu f ac ture r or q u n lif 1e d
Vr =. muumum vacuum spccried at the pad
\ifting device wdl be used. power systems shouJd be designed so that loss of the
VPR = UPCIN-. (419) selected based on U,e manufacturer's rating and the
49
rnaximum pressur npphed to that componcnt of thc n.:qurrements, wluch sh11JJ mclude the rnnxtrnum sum
syatern. provrdcd that the ratmg is bcsec on il design of all fluid powcr componcnts possibh.: to actuntc at onc
factor equnl to or greatcr than 1.67 N,,. time, slrntl be dctailecl in thc spoofcatlons.
manulacturcrs rating divtded by O.SO Nd Altemntely, If a change in fluid prcssure could result in
pneumatic fluid power componcnts my be selected m uncontro\!ed movement of thc lood, an mdicator should
accordance wrth pnra. 4-11.Z(b) be provided to allow the lifter opcrntor to verlfy that
(d) Componcnts whose failure will not rcsu!t in the Iluid pressure rs sufficient during all sreges of hfter
uncontrolled movement of thc load may be selected use. Addrnonal mdicators mny be necessnry to allnw
based on the manufacturer's rating. monitonng of va nous systems The fluid presurr
Where the liftcr uses an externa) fluid power sourcc resultlng from co!hsion wnh otherobjects and wrlippng
th;i! is nnt part o thc below-the-hook lifter, thc supply in thc cvcnt of tatlure.
50
C-A!IME--
Chapter 5
Electrical Components
This chepter sets forth selechon criterin for electncal geometry of the speed torque curve of the motor
hoists, end other liftlng emnomeru. Therefore, electncal Motors shall be sized so the rated motor torque is not
equipment used on these lihers is governed by
exceeded within !he specified workmg rnnge and/or
ANSI/NF:PA 70. Sometimes a lifter could be a
rated load uf the hfting device.
componen\ part of a machine too! system and could be
motor r
s properly s1zed or the ma x imum effort
{11) 5-1.3 Power Requirements enclosure used Un!ess otherw1se spec1hed, the hfhng
based on the opcratmg condittons that will crente the The mimmum insulahon rnting of motors and brakes
Commentary: Dueto the varietv and cumplexrtv of problem not obvious to everyone and is stated to
below-the-hook l1fting devrces. the method df horse emphaslze its importance. The 150% v.ilue equals the
power c.alc.ulation vares with the type of lilter and Is no! requirement for hoist brakes as defined In CMAA #70
specified in thrs soctlon The horsepower selection shall and AIST Technical Report No. 6.
51
.._...,,...s ......... -
,,,_ .. ,"s---MOlf SolOIO CNDINPll"S!R,S. 01..al" ..
....... ...... ,,,,>111,, 2:';.,. 0..
1
... ,. ... - ....-............ --., ...... s
I\SME lflll-l-1011
Motor t111d b rakc namcptatc voltugc sha!J be in Cnb opcnned master swnrhus slmll be spring return
accordancc w1th NEMA Standard MG 1 for thc specificd to neutrnl (off) pos1tion type, cxcepl that thosi for eler
powcr supply. Thc inStlllcr/uscr sho!l cnsurt thc tromilgnet or vacuum c(Jntrol shall be m,1\ntamed type
functional electricnlly powered lifting devicu. Thc lifting req uir ements found n the
i electrical sections of other
-device speclcadons sh all s tate tht locltlnn nf thc es tabl1shed era ne and hotst sp e c d 1 c a t io n s , such as
operntor interface choscn by a quahed pcrsnn from uu CMAA #70 and CMAA 1174. a nd 11re li sted in !h1s
(a) Use two push buttons m series spaced such that CMAA #70 and CMAA #74, and are l iste d in this
they require two-handed opemtion in order to open, Standard to m ai ntain compatibility between the crane
open, drop, or release motlon while the load is lifted. L1mtt switches, sensors, and other control dev1ces, 1!
(e) Use a mechaniral guard or cover over the actual ion used, shall be located, gu11rded, and protected to inhibit
dcvice that requires two specihc operntions to acnvnte inadvrrtent operiltion and damage resulting from
52
Coo-...SME,,,_
P, .......... 1HS AIIMe'
....,.._CMO...UUSlIU" 0!9,o'JU
... ,.,,._,_,.,_'*'11 __ ......... ,, ... K, _,.,_<J:11l/3/H7l,S> """'1
ASME BTH1-2011
lndication or stgnal lights shou!d be provrded to Control systems utilizing stetc or inverter assemblies
mdrcate power is "en" or "off" lf used, the lghts shall shall be sized wrth due ccnsrdcratlcn of motor, rating,
be located so that they are visible to the lifter operator. drve reguirements, service class, duty cycle, and
Multiple bulbs may be used to avold confusion due to apphcatmn m the control. If rnegnetic contactors are
a bumed-oul bulb. included within thc static assembly, they shall be rated
Controls rnounted on the lifti.ng devrce shall be (b) Provisions shall be made for mamtaining the
locnted, guarded,nnd designed for the envimnmcnt and control switch in posHion pcr section 5-3.2 to protect it
A qualified person desrgnated by the manufacturer selemum ar si!icon type, slzed to w1thstand the stalled
and/or owner, purchaser, or user of <1 motor dnvcn current of the motor. Silicon type rectifierssha!l employ
device shall determine the type and sue of control to transient suppressors to protect the rectifier from voltage
be used with the lifter for proper and safe opcratJon spikes.
have sufficreru stze and quanhty far starting, 5-4.B Electrical Endosures
the application does not exceed the contactar Commentary: These provis1ons parallel rcquire-
manufacturer's pubhshed rati.ng. Reversing conractors ments found in the electrical sections of estab!ished
shall be intedocked. crane and hoist specifications, such as CMAA #70 and
Comme111ary: These orovrsrons parallel compatibility between the crane and lifter.
Standard to maintam compatibility between the era ne Control systems for motor powcred l!fters shall
-
c....,,...,- ... -
Sald lo cNOIHOOSllOES. OIO>VlN
- .. ----'lll
.... _..,_.,_ _l;<I; _,..R-o.11>1l1>111 n.sn,om
/\SME BTHl-2011
specifled m ANSI/NFPA 70, These oev.ce, may be part 56.3 Disconnecl for Magnel (11)
Electrn::ally opcrnted liftmg devtces shnll be grounded connected on the line srde (power supply side) of the
5-7 BATIERIES
Control systems lor motor powered lifters shall
5-7.2 Enclosures
Horstmg equipmenl usmg an externnlly powercd shall be vented to prevent accumulation of gases.
flaggmg, or taggwg m the open (off) posiuo The Battery backup systems shall h.ive nn audib!t or
vacuum lifter disccnnect switch shall be connected on visibh.' sigrial to warn the Jifter opern\or when the
the line srde (power supply srd e] of the ho.sttng primary power is being supplied by the bnckup
54
E--..
_..,1>1s- ...... -,.SME 50IOIO.cAICl :>Ul!Tl!e. '""''11"
,... .. A .2>1l/J11, 1252;14
"""''"'._' ._""'9"""' .. ,.., .....,_,_,HS ""'l
ASME Services
ASME ls commltted to developmg and delivering technlcal inlormation. A! ASME' lnlormatlon Central, we makc every elfon 10 answer vour
questtons and excedte your orders Our representatlves are ready lo asstst vou m the fo(lowing a1eas
There are tour ccuons for makini: iriquiris or placing crcers. Sirnply mail, phone, tai, or E-mall us andan lnformatlcn Central reoresenreuve
07007-2900 (95-8008li32763)
Universal: 973-882-1167
1nformatlon Central staff are oo! pe1mitted to answer Inquines abcut the techmcal conteo of !his rnde or standard rntcrmanon as to
whether pr not techmcal inquines are tssued to tms code e- standard rs shown on the wpyr1ght page. AII tecbnkal inquines must bt
subrmnad m wnting 10 che stalf secretary Addltional urocedures for mquines way be llsted wlthin
_..
C-111't1AS ..Ei,,,,._._
..
..... ,
,..,._
..,._,,, ..
""'
"1&
...., coCAlrllf'ICIU5T"'9.
N
"'"
O, ... ......lC:llllli 1 :; '11' GM'!
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
..:;ME ...,,,_
.,
'
-M"E"'"""'
P,-OWH$_0<_,_.._ SOW ,o CAIOIJ<OOSTRoES. '"""'"'
No,,,,-.- .. -............ ....,..... ..,.. ,.,.IHS >lo< .... R, ..., 2<'11131" 2>S> " GMT
1SBH 978-0-791B-337-2
1
1111 111111 111111111111111 !111111
J17511
C-.<SME-1