TEORIA COMUNICARII, SEMINAR

Asist.univ.dr. Georgiana Udrea, georgiana.udrea@comunicare.ro

SEMINAR 1 (11, 13/ 18, 20 oct. 2016), Seminar introductiv

- prezentarea planului seminarului, a bibliografiei i a modalitii de evaluare;
- detalierea problematicii privind proiectele de echip (expunerea tematicii aferente
proiectelor, stabilirea echipelor de lucru i a termenelor-limit pentru predarea
lucrrilor etc.);
- clarificarea procesului i a etapelor parcurse n scopul elaborrii unei lucrri
tiinifice.

SEMINAR 2 (25, 27 oct/ 01, 03 nov. 2016), Comunicarea interpersonal: aplicaii.

Ritualuri de interaciune social

Bibliografie obligatorie
1. Olariu, F.T. (2007). Interaciunea verbal ntre ritual i strategie. Philologica
Jassyensia, An III, Nr. 2, pp. 105-136.
2. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New-
York: Pantheon Books, Random House, Inc. Fragmente disponible online:
http://hplinguistics.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/38289359/Goffman,%20Erving
%20'On%20Face-work'.pdf
3. Goffman, E. (2007). Viaa cotidian ca spectacol. Bucureti: Comunicare.ro (trad.
de Simona Drgan i Laura Albulescu) sau, n varianta original, The presentation
of self in everyday life (Introduction + Chapter I) University of Edinburg. Social
Science Research Centre. Available online:
http://monoskop.org/images/1/19/Goffman_Erving_The_Presentation_of_Self_in
_Everyday_Life.pdf
4. Gavreliuc, A. (2007). De la relaiile interpersonale la comunicarea social:
psihologia social i stadiile progresive ale articulrii sinelui (Capitolele:
Prezena celuilalt, pp. 23-31; Interaciunea cu cellalt, pp. 33-52;
Dramaturgia social, pp. 159-170). Iai: Polirom.

Bibliografie opional
1. Adler, R.B. & Rodman, B. (1988). Understanding Human Communication
(Chapter 6: Understanding Interpersonal relationships, pp. 132-159). New-York:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
2. Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2003). Face and politeness: new (insights) for old
(concepts). Journal of Pragmatics, 35(10-11), pp. 14531469.
3. Karsberg, H. (2012). Politeness strategies a theoretical framework. Unpublished
manuscript. Available online: http://hig.diva-
portal.org/smash/get/diva2:565250/FULLTEXT01.pdf

PROIECT 1: n grupuri de 4-5 studeni, realizai un studiu de teren bazat pe observaie

participativ prin care s identificai, s descriei i s analizai ritualurile de comunicare

1
ale unui grup clar delimitat: ritualuri de politee, ritualuri de conversaie, roluri i statute
n cadrul grupului (colegi de facultate, colegi de serviciu, anagajaii unei companii etc.)

SEMINAR 3 (08, 10/ 15, 17 nov. 2016)

Retoric public: aplicaii. Nararea identitii de sine n mediul online

Bibliografie obligatorie
1. Schau, H.J. & Gilly, M.C. (2003). We Are What We Post? SelfPresentation in
Personal Web Space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), pp. 385-404.
2. Gunn, S.E & Thumim, N. (2012). Socializing and Self-Representation Online:
Exploring Facebook, Observatorio Journal, 6(1), pp. 087-105.
3. Goffman, E. (2007). Viaa cotidian ca spectacol. Bucureti: Comunicare.ro
(trad. de Simona Drgan i Laura Albulescu) sau, n varianta original, The
presentation of self in everyday life (Chapter VI) University of Edinburg.
Social Science Research Centre. Available online:
http://monoskop.org/images/1/19/Goffman_Erving_The_Presentation_of_Self
_in_Everyday_Life.pdf
4. Gavreliuc, A. (2007). De la relaiile interpersonale la comunicarea social:
psihologia social i stadiile progresive ale articulrii sinelui (Cap.
Identitatea social, pp. 207-220). Iai: Polirom.

Bibliografie opional
1. Dalsgaard, S. (2008). Facework on Facebook. The presentation of self in virtual
life and its role in US elections, Anthropology today, 24(6), pp. 8-12.
2. Gonzales, A. & Hancock, J. (2010). Mirror, Mirror on my Facebook Wall: Effects
of Exposure to Facebook on Self-Esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social
Networking, 00(0), pp. 1-5.
3. De Fina, Anna (2006). Group identity, narrative and self-representations. In De
Fina, A., Schiffrin, D., Bamberg, M. (eds.), Discourse and identity, New York:
Cambridge Press, p. 351-375.

PROIECT 2: n grupuri de 4-5 studeni, realizai un studiu bazat pe analiz de coninut,

n care s identificai, descriei i analizai strategiile (imagini, discurs, naraiuni) prin
care se construiete imaginea de sine a unei personaliti publice pe Facebook.

SEMINAR 4 (22, 24/ nov., 29 nov/ 1 dec. 2016)

Prezentare proiecte tema 1

SEMINAR 5 (06, 08/ 13, 15 dec. 2016)

Prezentare proiecte tema 2

SEMINAR 6 (20, 22 dec. 2016/ 10, 12 ian 2017)

Seminar recapitulativ: prezentarea punctajului obinut la seminar de ctre fiecare
student n parte; recapitulare i rezolvarea unor grile n vederea pregtirii examenului
final.

2
EVALUARE:
Nota de seminar este alctuit dup cum urmeaz:
- punctajul aferent prezenei (5p fiecare prezen); 5p x 6 = 30p
- punctajul aferent activitii de seminar (5p pentru interveniile din cadrul fiecrui
seminar); 5p x 4 = 20p
- punctajul obinut n cadrul proiectului de echip (max. 50p)
Pentru nota 10 la seminar sunt necesare 95p!
NB: prezena este obligatorie n proporie de minimum 50% pentru a fi luat n
considerare nota de la seminar (4 prezene obligatorii)!

Alte referine bibliografice:

1. Adler, R.B. & Rodman, G. (1988). Understanding Human Communication (3rd

Ed.). New-York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
2. Abdul-Majeed, R.K. (2009). The Realization of Positive Politeness Strategies in
Language: The Politness Theory of Brown and Levinson. Journal of College of
Education for Women, 20(2), pp. 509-527.
3. Babbie, E. (2010). Practica cercetrii sociale. Iai: Polirom (trad. de Sergiu
Gherghina, George Jiglau, Monica Andriescu).
4. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Chelcea, S. (2001). Metodologia cercetrii sociologice. Metode cantitative
i calitative. Bucureti: Editura Economic.
6. Chelcea, S. (2000). Cum s redactm n domeniul tiinelor socioumane.
Bucureti: Editura SNSPA.
7. Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1993). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings
(Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics), Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
8. Fisher, Walter R. (1987). Human Communication as Narration: Toward a
Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Columbia: University of South Carolina
Press, p. 57-105.
9. Fitzgerald, H. (2002). How Different are We? Spoken Discourse in Intercultural
Communication. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
10. Joinson, A. (2008). Looking at, Looking up or Keeping up with People.
Motives and Uses of Facebook. CHI 2008 Proceedings (April 5-10, 2008,
Florence, Italy), pp. 1027-1036.
11. Langellier, K.M., & Peterson, E.E. (2004). Storytelling in daily life: Performing
narrative. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
12. Mehdizadeh, S. (2010). Self-Presentation 2.0: Narcissism and Self-Esteem on
Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(4), pp. 357-
364. Available online: http://www.fyiliving.com/wp-
content/uploads/2010/08/facebooknarcissist.pdf.
13. Mitchell, W. J. T. (2005). What do pictures want. The lives and loves of images,
Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.