Professional Documents
Culture Documents
D. Gerard J. Louis
Help University College, Malaysia
Abstract
The study set out to develop an interest inventory, using the Holland typology as the
framework for the model. The purpose of the study was to determine if this inventory
would produce a good fit with Holland·s RIASEC typology, using data from a
Malaysian sample. The Structural Equations Modeling analysis was used to test the
goodness of fit of this scale with the RIASEC typology. Initial results showed that the
inventory has an adequate fit using the RIASEC typology. More investigation has to be
done on the instrument to determine if the inventory also follows the RIASEC
ordering for a Malaysian sample.
Ask any school going student who has identified a career of choice , the
reasons for making such a decision and invariably you will get an answer to this
effect: ´because I am interested in itµ. It does not really matter if the student
has very little idea over what is required of the job, the skills or abilities needed
to do the job well or even the suitability of the job to this individual. All that
matters is the perceived interest towards the job.
Over the years, the vocational interests of a person has become the most
important trait used in determining occupational selection because there is a
greater ability to predict more accurately from interests than from aptitude for
individuals with many abilities who have the option to choose from a many
different occupations (Sharf, 2006). In fact, vocational interests have been a
pillar of vocational psychology and career counseling since the early 1 900s
(Betsworth & Fouad, 1997).
Vocational interest inventories are used by counselors to identify the
dominant occupational interests of their clients. The scores from these
inventories help the counselor to determine groupings of educational and
vocational possibilities. They form the basis for further exploration until a
suitable career choice is made (Savickas & Taber, 2006).
Many popular vocational interests instruments for individuals (such as
the Stong Interest Inventory (SII; Strong, 1994), Kuder Career Seach With
Person Match (Zytowski & Kuder, 1999), The Unisex Edition of the ACT
Interest Inventory (UNIACT; Swaney, 1995) report scores based on some form
of the Holland typology and is used as the standard method linking persons and
occupational alternatives (Reardon, Bullock, & Meyer, 2007). Holland·s theory
has in fact produced over 500 studies and has been more researched than any
other career development theory (Sharf, 2006). His typology is also integrated
into the Occupational Information Network (O*NET), a comprehensive
database sponsored by the U.S Department of Labor·s Employment and
Training Administration. This database provides information on about 975
occupations, worker skills, and job training requirements and has become the
main source of U.S. occupational information (U.S. Department of Labor,
1998).
cccccc cc
c
c
c | c c
c c
The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment
April 2010, Vol. 4
c
The basic proposition of Holland·s theory of vocational choice is that
people must select occupations and occupational environments that are
consistent with their personality type in order to have some measure of
satisfaction with their jobs (Brown, 2007). This is because people express
themselves, their interests, and values through their work choices and
experience (Sharf, 2006). The theory posits six personality types: realistic (R),
investigative (I), artistic (A), social (S), enterprising (E), and conventional (C) that
matches six specific work environments. Both individuals and environments
consist of a combination of types. The relationship among these types can be
spatially depicted in the form of an equilateral hexagon: Additionally, interests
are best represented by the hexagon in the following order: R -I-A-S-E-C with the
adjacent types more closely related compared to those types opposite in the
hexagon (Holland, 1985 as cited by Hansen, Sarman, Collins, 1999; Betsworth,
and Fouad, 1997).
Numerous studies have supported Holland 's RIASEC ordering and
hexagonal spatial configuration as a fair representation of interest structure
within the White American population. (e.g., Hansen, Collins, Swanson, &
Fouad, 1993; Rounds, Davison, & Dawis, 1979; Fouad, Cudeck, & Hansen,
1984 as cited in Hansen, Sarman, & Collins, 1999). Additionally, Swanson,
Gore, Leuwerke, D'Achiardi, Edwards, and Edwards (2006) noted that an
added advantage of the Holland codes is that due to the easy recall of these
codes, clients and counselors can expedite the gathering of information.
However, there are also studies that critique the Holland model noting
consistency in the proposed ordering of the R-I-A-S-E-C types in their data but
not the hexagonal configuration among African Americans (Swanson (1992);
Wakefield, Yom, Doughtie, Chang, and Alston (1975). Haverkamp et al. (1994)
also found significant departures in both ordering and configuration of the six
types in a sample of Asian American college students as did Hansen, Sarman,
and Collins (1999) with the Chicana(o) and Latina(o) segment of the U.S.
population. On the basis of many of these studies, doubts have been raised on
the universality of Holland·s proposed interest structure. Hansan, Saman, and
Collins (1999) citing the Rounds and Tracey (1996) study notes that non-U.S
samples and ethnic minority groups, including those from Australia and
Canada, did not typically exhibit Holland·s R -I-A-S-E-C configuration.
According to Sharf (2007), Holland himself acknowledges that his theory can be
affected by age, gender, social class, intelligence, and education.
cccccc cc
c
c
c | c c
c c
The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment
April 2010, Vol. 4
c
possible so that the person choosing statements for a job highly reflect the
environment. According to Brown (2007), one of the limitations of the Holland
classification is that work environments are rarely homogeneous. ´For example,
counselors are typically SAE (social, artistic, enterprising), but they operate in
many environments depending on their positions. Some counselors are
involved with massive amounts of paperwork, must use computers, and are
required to engage in extensive recordkeeping, all of which are more
compatible with conventional or investigative personality types than they are
with the preferences of SAEsµ (Brown, 2007, p.372). The researcher wanted to
limit this ambiguity in the respondents choices by choosing specific statements
from the job descriptions located in the various dictionaries of oc cupations such
as the O*NET and Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) which clearly
reflect a Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising or Conventional
type of person.
A 12 subscale model was also suggested as according to Brown (2007),
when the Holland classification system is used, it is sometimes difficult to help
clients identify all occupations that are related to their personality type. Meir,
Rubin, Temple, & Osipow (1997), in their examination of interest inventories
noted that Roe (1956) had actually separated Holland·s Social Careers into
person-to-person interactions which she labeled as ´Serviceµ and the
community or group interactions such as the educational and humanities
careers, which she labeled as ´General cultureµ. I believe this somewhat
addresses the difficulty in identifying occupations related to a personality type as
it gives the respondents a wider spread of occupations in more clearly
delineated categories. In the CASH-II, the Social Careers were also similarly
divided in two subscales, the ´Community and Service and Educationµ subscale
(which focuses on community level social interactions) and the ´Hospitality and
Tourismµ subscale (which focuses on the individual or personal service
interaction). Similarly, the Artistic Careers are divided into the ´Performing and
Fine Artsµ subscale and the ´Applied Written and Visual Artsµ subscale as they
help to further narrow down specific interests in the Artistic Careers, thereby
offering greater differentiation to respondents in identifying occupations related
to their personality type. (Further description of the CASH-II will be given in
the Method section).
Method
Participants
Data for the study was compiled from two sources. Both were
convenient samples. The first sources was data came from high school and
college students who attended a weekend live-in program at HELP University
College. A second sample source came from high school students who attended
the scholarship interviews conducted by the university at HELP itself and in
Seremban (a city outside of Kuala Lumpur). A total of 202 students between the
ages of 16-24 years took the test. For those who wished, they were given a quick
explanation of the test after the scoring was done.
cccccc cc
c
c
c | c c
c c
The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment
April 2010, Vol. 4
c
Materials
cccccc cc
c
c
c | c c
c c
The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment
April 2010, Vol. 4
c
subscales was guided by the Map-of-the-World (Counselor Version) developed
by Prediger et.al (1993) as cited in Brown (2007). The Map-of-the-World
shows the location of 26 families of jobs based on their relationships to four
primary work tasks: working with data, people, things, and ideas. These job
families are in turned also grouped according to six general areas of the world of
work, which are congruent with the Holland typology: administration and sales
(enterprising), business operations (conventional), technical (realistic), science
and technology (investigative), arts (artistic), and social service (social) (Brown,
2007). The decision to use the Map-of-the-World as an added guide to
determining the subscales was to ensure that there is was already an established
framework using these subscales which were related to the Holland typology.
Data Analysis
cccccc cc
c
c
c | c c
c c
The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment
April 2010, Vol. 4
c
variance accounted for by the model and GFI values ranging from 0 (poor fit) to
1 (perfect fit) (Darcy and Tracey, 2007).
Results
cccccc cc
c
c
c | c c
c c
h I t r ti J ur E u ti Ps h i ss ss t
ri
c
F
1
1
n 12
s
=
s , I = Inv s
v , =
s , =
, = n sn , =
nv n
n
j/j1
j
,
.
j j1
/j ,
j
/j j
j ,/
j !
j
j
,0
j/ /j2
"
/j//
j j
,
/j2 #
j /
j jj ,1
j 2 $
j00
j1
% 1j
&!
,
j
/j0 '(
j2 2j
j
,
j
j2 j/
&
) ,2
j
/j0 * "
% j2
% ,
+ j/
/j2
,
* 1j1
j2
,
-
,
s n n ns
w
n s
s 9 n 10, 7 n 3 n 7
n 8w
ns
w n
s
s9 n 6w sn s n
n
s
k ns
n
s
s n v n
s v s
q
n
n
n
s v s
n , nI n
sw
n s n
n
, = 0 74, > 001
s n s
s
s
n
,
nn
s n Inv s
v s
s n
n
s n n sn
s
F 2 s ws
s 2
s s
s w
c
c
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
j/0
j ,
. j
j ,
j
j
c
j01
j
j2
,/
j1
j/
j
"
,0
j
j1 j0
j1/
j0
#
,
j $
j
j0 j1 j00
j 0 ^ ,1
j2 j02
j1
j1 '( , j1
j1
j j2
j
j 1 ,
j
&
j0
j j * "
%
,2
%
j
jj2
* j01 ,
,
-
c
c
c
c * ,
)
c 10c s
ssc c s n n c sc c c nc I c sc c c + -
)
c c w c n,c s c c c nsc c sc c c 60c vc
. . ) ) ) /
n c
vc n ncccc n s c v
scn cccs c 50 cc
. )
cv ncccn ncn cv
sc
. 0 .
1 1 )
c
c1cn c
c2cs wccscccn nn cn cs nc
.
sc c n scc
ccsc
c
c
c
c
c
Table1 4
Table 2 4
Correlatios
RASEC types (R, A, AS, SE, EC, a CR) are greater tha the correlatios
3
amog pairs of alterate types (RA, S, AE, SC, ER, C). O the other ha , 3
cccccc cc
c
c
c | c c
c c
h I t r ti J ur E u ti Ps h i ss ss t
ri
c
6 8 9 9
p c p nsc nc sc c s pc psc ( ,c I ,c n c )c c n c 7
p nsc nc sc c pnpc psc c pc p nc p c p nsc
6 8 9 9
nc sccs pcpsc( ,cI ,cn c)cF c3cs wscp cn ·sc
7
c
&
(
3&4 j1 34
c
c3c 6
snccp nsccnpc sc( I,cI,c,c",c",c)cnc
6
pnpc sc( ,cI ,c",c,c",cI)ccI"cscw p cp cspc
7
IIcc
c
Ic c Ic c c c "c c "c c c c
I c
7 c I c
7 c I c7 c I c
7 c I c
7 c I c
7
c c c c c c c c c c c
Table 4 <
Compariso of Correlatios of Adjace Pairs (R, , AS, SE, EC, CR) a
> < >
;
@ A
=
B
R RS RS AS RS SE RS EC RS CR RS
C C C C C C
AC AC AC AC AC AC
Note. Eclosed cells FiDEcate a reverse stregth i relatioship betee the pairs. E.g. the I
Opposite pairs of RS, , aD AC have a bigger correlatio compared E GH the Adjace G Pair
istead of the reverse.
Table 5
Compariso of Correlatios of Alterate Pair (RA, , AE, SC, ER, C a
> < > @ A
? =
J
RA RS RS AE RS SC RS ER RS C RS
C C C C C C
AC AC AC AC AC AC
Note. Eclosed pairs iDEcate a reverse stregth relatioship betee the pairs. E.g. the
F
Alterate Pairs of RS, , aD AC have a bigger correlatio compared E GH the Opposite Pair of
RA istead of the reverse.
Discussio
@ A
This study set out to examie the goodess of fit of the CASH-
< > @
;
origial 120 item, 12 subscale ive ry as i ally a poor fit usig the
@
;K ;
Holla ·s circular model. Follo g through from this, items ere re -examied
=
@ A
L
i the Commu Service a Educatio a Marketig a Sales subscales
;K ; = = =
@
L
respectively. These ely merged subscales ere reamed as Commu a ; =
also yielded a 96 item istrume from the origial 120 items. Hoever, due to
;
time costrai s i producig this paper, the adjusted scale could be te sted
;
@ @
K;
o to a e sample. Hoever, usig data from the i al sample, the statistical A@
;
aalysis as able to produce a model ch as a good fit to the Holla ·s @
=
cccccc cc
c
c
c | c c
c c
The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment
April 2010, Vol. 4
c
comparison of the correlations of ordered pairs between the adjacent, alternate,
and opposite pairs on the hexagonal model showed that the adjusted 10 scale
instrument was able to generate up to 47 pairs from the possible 72 predicted
outcomes. Further statistical analysis on this is required to assess if this outcome
is statistically significant.
While the adjusted model presented positive goodness of fit data, it
does not indicate clearly what type of structural model it actually follows. In a
review of the circumplex structure of Holland·s RIASEC, Darcey and Tracey
(2007) citing Guttman (1954) labeled that term circumplex to refer to a general
pattern of relations. In reference to Holland·s model, it could be structured as
circulant model (where all the RIASEC types are equally spaced around a
circle) or a structure which has a less exact circular ordering of variables (Darcy
and Tracy, 2007). Determination of the ordering of the structure can be done
using various analytical methods such as the randomization test of hypothes ized
order relations (Hubert and Arabie, 1987) and multidimensional scaling (MDS).
The weak attempt to manually assess the number of ordered correlated pairs
still required a test of significance (which was out of the scope of the course that
we took in Advance Statistics). Additionally, as there was a revision of the
instrument without testing the new subscales with a different sample, MDS
could not be done to observe the spatial ordering of the RIASEC using the
adjusted CASH-II.
On the other hand, Gati (1978) was able to create a hierarchy model
based on the results of a cluster analysis of Holland·s model which partitions the
RIASEC type into a three group single partition [RI]-[AS]-[EC]. Could it also be
possible therefore that the poor fit of the original 12 subscale model maybe due
to the fact that it follows a different kind of structuring than the hypothesized
circular model as there are many different ways to structure the typology. Long
and Tracey (2005) noted in a structural meta-analysis to evaluate the fit of four
different representations of the relations among RIASEC types from Chinese
participants. Their results indicated that Holland·s circular model was the worst
of the 4 models tested in this population, rega rdless of RIASEC measure,
gender, region or age. An analysis of the respondents who took the CASH-II
indicated that 84% of the respondents in the sample were made up of Malaysian
Chinese. Could this have contributed to the lack of fit hypothesizing a circular
model for the original CASH-II.
Finally, a poor fit of the original 12 subscale model could also have been
due to the lack of participants in the sample. The Structural Equations
Modeling method of analysis typically requires a large sample using as a rule of
thumb, at least 20 respondents for every variable in the model. Given this, we
would have required at least 240 respondents for the analysis (we obtained only
202 respondents). Scaling down the variables to 10 in the adjusted CASH-II
helped in producing a better fit of the mode l as it then met with the sample size
requirement.
A more in depth analysis of the both the 12 and 10 subscale model
should be done in the future to explore their fit in other types of models such as
the quasi-circumplex and hierarchical models to determine if there is greater
consistency with these structures. Additionally, a test of significance using the
randomization test of hypothesized order relations would offer a better picture
of the CASH-II in relation to its fit with the circular model of Holland.
cccccc cc
c
c
c | c c
c c
The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment
April 2010, Vol. 4
c
References
Betsworth, D.G., & Fouad, N.A. (1997). Vocational interests: A look at the past
70 years and a glance at the future. The Career Deelopment
Quarterly, 46(4), 352-360.
Brown, D. (2007). Career nformation, Career Counseling, and Career
Deelopment (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternatie ways of assessing model fit.
n K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation
models (pp. 136²162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Darcy, U.A., & Tracey, J.G. (2007). Circumplex Structure of Holland·s
RASEC nterests Across Gender and Time. Journal of Counseling
Psychology, 54(1), 17²31.
Gati, . (1979). A hierarchical model for the structure of ocational interests.
Journal of Vocational Behaior, 15, 90-106.
Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radix. n P. F.
Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp.258²
348). Glencoe, L: Free Press.
Hansen, J.C., Sarman, Z.M., & Collins, R.C. (1999). An ealuation of Holland·s
model of ocational interests for Chicana(o) and Latina(o) college
students. The Journal of Measurement and Ealuation in
Counseling and Deelopment, 32(1), 2-14.
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1987). Ealuating order hypotheses within proximity
matrices. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 172²178.
Long, L., & Tracey, J.G. (2006). Structure of RASEC scores in China: A
structural meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behaior, 68, 39²51.
Meir, E.., Rubin, A., Temple, R., & Osipow, S.H. (1997). Examination of
interest inentories based on Roe·s classification. The Career
Deelopment Quarterly. 46(1), 48-62.
Prediger, D. J., & Swaney, K. B. (1995). Using UNACT in a comprehensie
approach to assessment for career planning. Journal of Career
Assessment, 3, 429-451.
Reardon, R.C., Bullock, E.E., & Meyer, K.E. (2007). A Holland Perspectie on
the U.S. Workforce from 1960 to 2000. The Career Deelopment
Quarterly, 55(3), 262-275.
Saickas, M.L., & Taber, B.J. (2006). ndiidual Differences in RASEC Profile
Similarity Across Fie nterest nentories. Journal of Measurement and
Ealuation in Counseling and Deelopment, 38(4), 203-211.
Sharf, R.S. (2006). Applying career deelopment theory to counseling (4th ed.).
Thomson-Brooks/Cole, Belmont. CA.
Swanson, J. L. (1992). The structure of ocational interests for African
American college students. Journal of Vocational Behaior, 40, 144-157.
Swanson, J.L., Gore, P.A., Leuwerke, W. D·Archiadi , C. et.al. (2006). Accuracy
in recalling interest inentory information at three time interals. The
Journal of Measurement and Ealuation in Counseling and
Deelopment, 38(4), 236-246.
Tracey, T.J., & Rounds, J. (1996). Cross-Cultural Structural Equialence of
RASEC Models and Measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
43(3), 310-329.
cccccc cc
c
c
c | c c
c c
The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment
April 2010, Vol. 4
c M
U.S. Department of Labor. (1998). O* NET 98 eer user's guide for ersion
LO. Wakefield,
J. A., Jr., Yom, B. L., Doughtie, E. B., Chang, W. C., & Alston, H. L. (1975).
The geometric relationship beteen Holland's personality typology and
the Vocational Preference Inentory for Blacks. Journal of Counseling
Psychology, 22, 58-60.
c
Gerard as a former school Principal and has been inoled in the field of
counseling, training and education for oer 20 years. He is a registered and
M
member of the Ad sory Counseling Panel to the Minister of Women, Family
and Community Deelopment. Gerard as also in charge of setting up and
seeing to the full accreditation of the Masters in Counse ling at HELP Uniersity
M
cccccc cc
c
c
c | c c