And the aggrieved party should not be provided compensation under Art.

21 and 32 of
the Constitution of Westeros.

In Francis Coralie v. Union Territory of Delhi,1 observed that:

The right to live includes the right to live with human dignity and all that goes along with it,
viz., the bare necessities of life such as adequate nutrition, clothing and shelter over the head
and facilities for reading writing and expressing oneself in diverse forms, freely moving
about and mixing and mingling with fellow human beings and must include the right to basic
necessities the basic necessities of life and also the right to carry on functions and activities
as constitute the bare minimum expression of human self.

Also, Art. 32 of the Indian Constitution is a remedial fundamental right that guarantees all
other fundamental rights of the constitution. Indian Constitution is the only constitution to
include as its fundamental right as a remedy to enforce its fundamental rights.2 The article has
been described by Dr. Ambedkar as the Heart and Soul of the constitution of India.3
if framers of the constitution have given these rights to the people of India, there must have
been some remedy to the injured persons in case of infringement of these rights. Art. 32 was
considered to be the remedy, right from the inception of the Constitution , for the vindication
and maintenance of the Fundamental Rights.4 The clause (2) has a wide interpretation and
extends to issuing of any directions or orders that may be appropriate for the enforcement of
any of the fundamental rights. In the exercise of that wide power the court has directed state
to pay compensation and exemplary costs for breach of fundamental right.5

Supreme Court in Khatri v. State of Bihar,6 in 1981. The remedy of compensation for
violation of fundamental rights by Supreme Court and High Court under Art. 32 and Art.
7
2268 is well established.

1
1981 AIR 746, 1981 SCR (2) 516
2
A.B.S.K. Sangh (Rely) v. Union of India AIR 1981 SC 298
3
Constituent Assembly Debates, Vol. VII, 953
4
Mr. Parmindra Dadhich, Compesation on Breach of Fundamental Rights, 1, BLR,113-116 (2016)
5
Mahendra Pal Singh, V. N. Shuklas Constitution of India, Pg 344
6
Khatri v. State of Bihar A.I.R. 1981 S.C. 928
7
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 2001 SC 3173
8
The Constitution of India, 1949
In the instant matter, Art. 19(1)(g) and Art 21 has been not violated by the State which is the
a fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of the country, thereby not violating the
principle of federalism and hence, Constitutional compensation should not be provided to the,
Tony Strak and Bruce Wayne in the current situation. Right to Life has not been violated by
the TN-SGST law as the State acted as per mandate.