Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SESC-07
1. Purpose
2. Requirements
3. Responsibilities
1
c. Coordinate the Design Specification with any Working
Groups for which coordination was required in the
Project Plan.
2
Annex: Design Specification Format and Content Requirements
4. Revision
a. This procedure shall be reviewed for changes or
reaffirmation in 2001.
3
standards
4.1 Style and presentation
4.2 Terminology
5 Structure of [name of standard]
6 Content of [name of standard]
4
2.1 Purpose
This paragraph describes the intended value of the proposed
standard for the customers described in previous sections.
2.2 Field of application
This paragraph describes "what" will be done, i.e., the
technical boundaries of the project. It may also state what is
being excluded. It shall describe the category of the
proposed standard (standard, recommended practice,
guideline).
3 Interaction with other standards
Section 3 describes terminology, placement, and interface
conventions needed to permit the IEEE software engineering
standards to be recognized as integral group of professional
standards. This section is arranged in the following
paragraphs.
3.1 Vocabulary standard
This paragraph describes the source(s) of key terminology to
be used in the proposed standard.
3.2 Road map standard
This paragraph provides the relationship of the proposed
standard with IEEE software engineering standards road
map. A road map provides an introduction to key software
engineering concepts and guidance on the application of
software engineering standards. The road map used by SESC
is described in Software Engineering Standards: A Users
Road Map, James W. Moore (1997), IEEE Computer Society
Press.
3.3 Quality system standards
This paragraph describes as appropriate the relationship of
the proposed standard with ISO 9000 series of standards.
See SESC Policy statements 1 and 4 for more information on
SESC commitment to the ISO 9000 series.
3.4 Software life cycle process standards
This paragraph describes the relationship (if any) of the
proposed standard with IEEE software life cycle process
standards. See SESC Policy statements # 2, 5 and 6 for more
information on SESC commitment to life cycle process
standards.
3.5 Supporting standards
5
This paragraph describes the relationship of the proposed
standard with other IEEE standards with which its use would
interact.
4 Consistency among the IEEE software engineering standards
Section 4 describes packaging conventions needed to permit
the IEEE software engineering standards have the
appearance of an organized collection. This section is
arranged in the following paragraphs.
4.1 Style and presentation
This paragraph provides the conventions to be followed to
achieve consistency of style and presentation among the
IEEE software engineering family of standards. Related
standards should use a similar structure. For example,
process standard that are one level of detail below an IEEE
software engineering life cycle process standard should
describe processes in a similar manner. Note: The style of
presentation should have a logical structure that relates to
normal business practice, be written in a style that can be
easily understood by all personnel in the user's organization,
have balanced content in each section, keep sentences
short while maintaining clarity and continuity avoid dual-
purpose words and idiomatic expressions.
4.2 Terminology
This paragraph provides the conventions to be followed to
achieve consistency of terminology among the IEEE software
engineering family of standards. Also provides is the
terminology that is fundamental to the proposed standard.
5 Structure of [name of standard]
Section 5 provides the table of contents (first level) of the
proposed standard.
6 Content of [name of standard]
Section 6 lists the topics to be incorporated in the proposed
standard. A list of potential diagrams and relationships with
the topics is provided. The topics may range from concepts
6
to specific processes, notations, products, criteria or
frameworks to be included. It also describes the method for
assessing or testing the proposed standard.